Transcript Highlights:

• They're requesting an extension to submit the executed consolidation agreement.
• . ...of availability of local match funds and to finalize the consolidation agreement.
• Their agreement on it? How recently did that happen?
• That was 2021, and that hasn't changed, their agreement on it? No, Mr.
• Yes, I think we're all in agreement. We want to get those dollars expended and appreciate that.

Summary: The Water Sector Commission met with a quorum and first approved the minutes from the prior meeting. Chairmen reminded members that no funding had yet been appropriated for future Water Sector awards, so any discussion of upcoming projects remained speculative until the legislature acts. The committee then moved through a series of deadline extension requests for phase two state-funded projects, including Delcambre, Faraday, Meyer Branch Water Corporation, and Waterworks District No. 1 of Pointe Coupee Parish. Each extension was approved after brief discussion, including testimony explaining local match timing, consolidation agreements, and project delays. The committee next considered several phase one ARPA-funded requests. St. Tammany Parish Project 845 received approval for a scope change to relocate an unmarked fiber optic line discovered during construction. Tallulah’s mayor gave an extended update on the city’s water rehabilitation project, explaining that the original project had been bid twice, that the state had already completed some emergency work, and that the city wanted to isolate the purchase of four permanent media filters and related electrical work from the original rehab plan. Members questioned whether the request was a scope change or a partial implementation of the original project, but ultimately approved it. The committee also approved additional funding for the City of Kaplan’s sewer project and for Ponchatoula’s sewer project, with Ponchatoula explaining that the increase covered emergency levee repair, miscellaneous equipment and safety items, and a force main reroute around unmarked fiber and other obstacles. St. Martin Parish Water Project 1001 was approved for additional funding after engineers explained that the final well site and related work cost more than originally estimated, though the project remained within the original consolidation plan. West Allen Water Works also received approval for additional funding after its new groundwater well encountered unexpected geologic problems; the contractor and engineers agreed to reduce their fees to preserve the project’s match structure, and members asked that the in-kind match be clearly documented for JLCB. By contrast, Tensaw Water Distribution Association’s large request for additional funding to complete a consolidation with Newelton drew significant concern over cost growth and timing. After discussion of the project’s scope, the need to serve Newelton, and the possibility of future reapplication or further value engineering, the committee voted to defer the Tensaw item to the next meeting for more review. At the end of the meeting, staff reported that 42.11% of ARPA funds remained and reviewed a list of high-risk projects, noting that the committee was trying to ensure ARPA dollars are drawn first and reconciled properly before deadlines. Members discussed the need to ground-truth self-reported project status and potentially adjust procedures to better track construction progress and final draws. The meeting concluded with no subfund or termination items and adjourned after a motion by Senator Bass.

Transcript Highlights:

• of the commitment letter that we send to each borrower and also a standard condition of the loan agreement
• :11.280><c> loan</c> also a standard condition of the loan also a standard condition of the loan agreement
• </c> agreement itself. self. agreement itself. self.
• 19:15.520><c> depreciation</c> We require our borrowers to submit to us, after they sign the loan agreement
• us after they sign the loan agreement updated<00:19:33.120><c> financial</c><00:19:33.679><c> statements

Keywords: November 20, 2025 00:12 Call to Order and Roll Call 00:58 Information Items 06:50 Finance and Administration Cabinet 09:10 KY Infrastructure Authority 21:20 Office of Financial Management 29:14 Meeting Recessed 44:58 Reconvened 45:07 Approval of Minutes 46:35 Next Meeting Date 47:05 Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The committee met without a quorum for much of the meeting, so several agenda items were initially heard only for information. Early updates included six informational reports, such as an Auditor of Public Accounts compliance examination with no findings, university equipment and allocation reports, school district bond issuances, Western Kentucky University’s planned public-private partnership housing redevelopment, and quarterly Kentucky Communications Network Authority reports. Members then questioned WKU officials about the P3 housing project, including the number of RFQ responses, property tax responsibility, ownership of the student life foundation, and the status of repairs to residence halls. WKU said the foundation has owned the property since 2000, one hall would be razed or demolished at the end of the academic year, and repairs to the other two were expected to be completed by fall 2027. The committee also heard a Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources acquisition project for Mount River Farms in Wayne County and a Department of Corrections roof replacement project at Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, but no votes were taken until a quorum was later established. The Kentucky Infrastructure Authority then presented six loans and four grant reallocations, including loan increases for Adair County Water District and the City of Harlan, new loans for Litchfield, Louisa, Southeastern Water Association, and Flatwoods, and grant reallocations under the Cleaner Water Program. Members asked about Harlan’s 30-year term and special condition requiring a revenue increase; KIA explained the longer term is reserved for disadvantaged communities and that the condition was meant to reinforce standard debt coverage requirements, while depreciation is reviewed but not included in cash-flow calculations. After a recess, Senator Thomas arrived and a quorum was reached. The committee approved the prior minutes and then took a consolidated vote on the action items, which passed. The final items included a Kentucky Economic Development Authority revenue bond refunding for CommonSpirit Health, several Kentucky Housing Corporation conduit and single-family bond issuances, a Western Kentucky University bond issuance, and SFCC debt issues. Members discussed the housing transactions, noting they are developer-financed and not subject to a traditional bidding process, and expressed concern about whether the process could produce more units for the same amount of money. The meeting adjourned after all information items were approved and the next meeting date was announced.

Transcript Highlights:

• Whereby an item could be repatriated back to, say, Pueblo, and then enter into a loan agreement where
• that allocates funding to your department for the holdings, or Do you establish separate agreements,
• Each of the those agreements outline the collection fee, which goes to support staffing, heating, cooling
• What's not included currently in those agreements is any help and assistance they want with repatriation
• I had to sign that I was in agreement with what was about to occur.

Committee: House House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• And the reason for that is because I think we've all come to the agreement that there are therapeutic
• I think we've come to that agreement.
• I am so much in agreement with you on keeping kids safe.
• I'm in agreement with getting this stuff out of gas stations. I'm in so much in agreement.
• And I would love to see how we can get to an agreement where we can build a bridge to these folks.

Bills: SB5 , SB11 , SB12 , SB9 , SB42 , SB15 , SB5 , SB11 , SB12 , SCR1

Keywords: hemp regulation, consumable products, cannabinoids, occupational licenses, criminal offenses, SB 11, Texas attorney general, election crimes, election law enforcement, criminal prosecution, Election Code, Government Code Chapter 402, local prosecutors, county attorney, district attorney, grand jury, probable cause reports, state election offenses, voter fraud, election integrity

Transcript Highlights:

• be structured so we have within the bill some of the elements that would be required within the agreement
• The agreement must include this is line 126 the agreement must include provisions related to student
• When we go into these agreements, do we also spell out, you know, for example—and I'm sure President
• and I go there, all of that will be within contract and negotiated in advance before any facility agreement
• Osgood had some excellent questions as it relates to indemnifying the school district on these agreements

Committee: Senate Appropriations Committee on Pre-K - 12 Education

Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Pre-K-12 Education met with a quorum and took up several education bills. SB 1150, by Senator Calatayud, was presented as a measure to help school districts retain school social workers by removing an exam requirement unrelated to the profession. With no questions or debate, the committee voted the bill favorably. The committee then moved to SB 1514, by Senator Smith, on anaphylaxis response in public schools. After adopting a delete-all amendment and a late-filed amendment clarifying FDA-approved epinephrine devices and weight-based dosing, the committee heard support from Orange County Public Schools and reported the bill favorably. The most extensive discussion centered on SB 1708, also by Senator Calatayud, which would expand Schools of Hope by broadening the definition of low-performing schools from those in the bottom 10% in both math and reading to those in the bottom 10% in either subject, and would authorize co-location of Schools of Hope in underused public school facilities. Senators questioned how co-location would work, who could enroll, how liability and contracts would be handled, and whether the bill would help the specific students most in need. Many public speakers opposed the bill, arguing it would strain already underfunded public schools, reduce space and resources, and unfairly favor charter operators. The sponsor said the bill would not reduce classroom space in use, would require contracts to address safety and liability, and would provide a net positive to districts through a $600-per-student facility payment plus associated funding. After debate from both supporters and skeptics, the committee reported the bill favorably. The committee also considered CS for SB 822, by Senator Rodriguez, which would give charter schools more autonomy over governance and operations, including deadlines, enrollment caps, student conduct policies, and data sharing. The Florida Charter School Alliance supported the bill, arguing it would create parity and reduce burdens on charter schools, while committee members pressed the witness on claims of district “harassment” and the basis for those concerns. The bill was reported favorably after a roll call vote. At the end of the meeting, members recorded votes on prior tabs, thanked staff, and adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Finally, it funds all the collective bargaining agreements that are before us across government and higher
• Finally, it funds all the collective bargaining agreements that are before us across government and higher
• Finally, it funds all the collective bargaining agreements that are before us across government and higher
• Lucia and the Bahamas were able to sign the partnership agreement. St.
• Lucia and the Bahamas were able to sign the partnership agreement in tourism, education, and health care

Keywords: 1212, all

Transcript Highlights:

• For brief background, under state law governing vehicle manufacturer and dealer franchise agreements,
• Under state law governing vehicle manufacturer and dealer franchise agreements, various practices are
• It reflects an agreement between our auto dealers and two companies that are already selling vehicles
• So I think it's, on balance, a good agreement and a good compromise.
• On balance, it's a good agreement and a good compromise, and I look forward to the public testimony.

Summary: The Senate Transportation Committee held public hearings on three bills: SB 6225, a proposed substitute bond bill authorizing transportation funding bonds; SB 6005, the proposed substitute supplemental transportation budget; and SB 6354, a bill to expand access to electric vehicles through limited direct sales by qualifying EV-only manufacturers and changes to the documentary service fee. Staff explained that SB 6225 would authorize $1.1 billion in general obligation bonds, an additional $400 million for selected Move Ahead Washington highway projects, a $500 million increase in SR 520 bond authority, and the expiration of some older unused bond authorizations. For SB 6005, staff described a $17.5 billion supplemental budget with $1.5 billion in new funding, including reappropriations, preservation and maintenance spending, ferry investments, Climate Commitment Act-related adjustments, and a six-year balanced plan through 2031. For SB 6354, staff outlined the direct-sales framework for qualifying EV manufacturers, dealer licensing requirements, penalties for violations, and a fee increase that would direct revenue to EV rebates and multimodal transportation. Testimony on the budget and bond bills was broadly supportive from transit, local government, labor, construction, ports, and climate advocates, who praised preservation funding, ferry investments, safety programs, EV charging, rail electrification, and flood-response or local project funding. Several witnesses asked for specific project or account changes, including support for Skagit Transit, Day Road and Poplar Way bridge-related funding, Spokane TMC operating support, Kent corridor funding, and additional rail capital projects. Some speakers also urged more Climate Commitment Act funding for EV rebates, charging, and rail electrification, while others warned against deeper cuts to local programs and stressed the need for long-term preservation and bonding to stabilize the system. Testimony on SB 6354 was sharply divided. Rivian, Lucid, and several Washington auto dealers supported the bill as a compromise that would allow limited direct sales for EV-only manufacturers while preserving franchise protections and generating revenue for EV rebates. Climate advocates supported the bill as a way to accelerate EV adoption and asked that more of the fee revenue go to instant rebates for low-income buyers. In opposition, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation and Honda argued the bill creates unequal rules, weakens the franchise system, and was not the product of a true compromise. The committee announced that SB 6225 and SB 6005 would be in executive session Thursday at 8 a.m., with amendments due by noon the prior day, while SB 6354 would be scheduled for executive action later.

Transcript Highlights:

• In order to be able to go into one of those facilities, you have to sign an admissions agreement.
• And if you are experiencing dementia, you don't have the capacity to sign that admissions agreement.
• In order to be able to go into one of those facilities, you have to sign an admissions agreement.
• And if you you have to sign an admissions agreement.
• Then they can get the order to be able to sign that admissions agreement.

Committee: Senate Judiciary and Rules

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This program is really months away from entering into that cooperative agreement.
• This was essential for us to sign the agreements. We're very proud that they are in Texas.
• And we submit it for our final approval process, and then we can sign the agreement.
• There's a lot of things that I'm not in agreement with, and one of them being and I'll just be honest
• I was hoping I would be sitting here today saying that we've signed the cooperative agreement, but the

Committee: House House Appropriations & Finance

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The special session agreement here goes back to the base budget that was being carried in the governor's
• And I’m so glad that we were able to get these provisions added into the agreement at the end.
• And I’m so glad that we were able to get these provisions added into the agreement at the end.
• added<00:20:50.880><c> into</c><00:20:52.159><c> um</c><00:20:52.240><c> the</c><00:20:52.720><c> agreement
• </c> added into um the agreement at the end. added into um the agreement at the end.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Additionally, the House is now in agreement with the Senate, uh, for dual training grants for legal cannabis
• Um, the House is now in agreement with the Senate offer on that item.
• </c><00:04:05.040><c> with</c><00:04:05.120><c> the</c> the House is now in agreement with the the House
• is now in agreement with the Senate<00:04:05.599><c> offer</c><00:04:06.080><c> on</c><00:04:06.319>
• are there anyone from the audience that would like to testify about any portion of the bill or the agreement

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The meeting focused on a House counteroffer to a higher education budget and policy agreement, with Ken Savory walking members through spreadsheet changes and Mr. Hopkins reviewing policy items. On the budget side, the House adjusted several appropriations and savings targets, including state grants, child care grants, student teacher and shortage area grants, student parent support, spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury research grants, dual training grants for legal cannabis employers, and University of Minnesota cannabis research. The House also noted no change to Minnesota State, alignment with the Senate on the summer academic enrichment program, and that remaining state grant parameters would continue to be negotiated. On policy, the House said some items were agreed to and grayed out, including campus sexual misconduct policy and treatment of appropriations. The House kept its original position on the NN Mayo Clinic Partnership and did not include K-12 direct admissions or the College Financing Literacy Act. It also proposed adjusting OHEI appropriations for competitively and legislatively named grant programs so administrative cost reserves would conform to 10% and 5% parameters when current law is below those levels. The committee then heard testimony in support of continuing the spinal cord injury/traumatic brain injury grant program at its current level. Joey Carlson described his spinal cord injury, his career path, and how the program helped advance research and industry connections, while Matthew Broadick argued the program has produced clinical trials, FDA approval-related progress, jobs, and strong return on investment. He also said the program belongs at the Office of Higher Education rather than the Department of Health because its mission better fits research and innovation. Members asked about the program’s long-term home, and the witnesses defended OHE’s role. No votes were taken; the chair thanked the House for the offer, said it would be reviewed, and recessed the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• And most of the time, a business's operating agreement can override this legislation. Thank you.
• And most of the time, a business's operating agreement can override this legislation. Thank you.
• The town law enforcement there is also in agreement with this because they would go to one house, not
• The town law enforcement there is also in agreement with this. law enforcement there is also in agreement

Bills: HB344

Committee: Senate Elections & Government Affairs

Keywords: campaign finance, elections, transparency, political committees, reporting requirements, enforcement

Summary: The Senate Elections and Government Affairs Committee heard several election- and campaign-related bills. House Substitute 2 for House Bill 155 would make Public Integrity Commission reports publicly available on the commission’s website, add a specific travel-expense reporting category, and remove the FOIA requirement for accessing reports; Senator Richardson said he supported the transparency measure and asked to be added as a co-sponsor. The committee also took up House Bill 444, the Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which would create state protections against voter suppression and vote dilution, expand language access, prohibit intimidation and deception, and allow court remedies for violations. The bill drew strong support from advocacy groups including YWCA Delaware, the League of Women Voters, the ACLU, and the Legal Defense Fund, and several senators voiced support and interest in moving it quickly. House Bill 430, a constitutional amendment proposal, would make explicit that only natural persons may vote in Delaware elections, including municipal elections, in response to concerns about corporate or other artificial-entity voting in some towns. The discussion focused heavily on Fenwick Island, where the mayor testified that the town’s charter has long allowed certain artificial entities to vote in local elections and said the system is limited and has worked for years; other speakers argued the bill was needed to prevent corporate dilution of residents’ votes. Senator Richardson expressed concern about restricting entities with a local stake, while Senator Hoffner and others emphasized the principle of one person, one vote. Senator Townsend presented House Bill 344, which would tighten campaign finance rules by requiring Delaware bank accounts for candidates and committees, recurring training, better documentation of candidate loans, longer record retention, automatic filing extensions, and inactive status for noncompliant committees; one public commenter opposed the bill on cost grounds. He also presented House Bill 448, which would allow campaign funds to be used for reasonable security expenses for candidates and elected officials, with guardrails, and a commenter suggested allowing electronic security systems without a cap. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 472, a local de-annexation measure for Noble’s Pond in Cheswold to remove scattered residential lots from town boundaries and resolve uneven tax treatment; Senator Hoffner noted local law enforcement supported the change. The committee adjourned after hearing no further public comment on HB 472, and the vote to adjourn was unanimous.

Transcript Highlights:

• Local governments are authorized to enter into interlocal agreements under the Interlocal Cooperation
• shelter can also be located within a jurisdiction with which the local government has an interlocal agreement
• A restriction like that silences the voices of the people who may be opposed or may be in agreement with
• Chair, and we're generally in agreement with this. Thank you. Great.
• You know, the city that I came from actually had an interlocal agreement between Bellevue, Redmond, and

Summary: The Housing Committee considered two bills in executive session. House Bill 2266, the “step housing” bill, was presented with a proposed substitute that set different siting rules for transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, emergency shelters, and emergency housing; allowed some local standards and certifications; required local code updates within two years or the next comprehensive plan update; and grandfathered existing facilities. Members debated several amendments, adopting amendments to allow form-based codes, clarify timing and definitions, and preempt conflicting local requirements, while rejecting amendments that would have added school/daycare setbacks, expanded operational requirements, or changed local program conditions. The committee then approved the substitute bill on a 10-7 vote and reported it out with a do pass recommendation. House Bill 2489 would bar local governments from adopting or enforcing laws that criminalize or penalize life-sustaining activities on public property unless adequate alternative shelter space is available. The proposed substitute narrowed and clarified the bill, including exceptions for imminent harm, emergency access, disability access, and certain criminal laws; it also allowed regional shelter agreements and broadened the definition of adequate alternative shelter space. Members adopted an amendment allowing portable mats, beds, or other sleeping spaces in drop-in overnight shelters, including those in religious buildings, while rejecting or withdrawing other amendments, including one on park facilities and one on weapons. After debate over public safety, shelter availability, and local control, the committee passed the substitute bill on a 9-8 vote and reported it out with a do pass recommendation. The chair then announced the committee would not meet the following day.

Transcript Highlights:

• All in agreement say aye. Aye. Any nays? All right.
• All right, all in agreement say aye. Aye. Any nays? Nope. Ayes have it.
• All in agreement say aye. Any nays? Nope. Ayes have it.
• All in agreement, say aye. Any nays. Ayes have it. Docket 18-04-14-2501 is approved.
• All right, all in agreement say aye. Aye. Any opposed?

Summary: Senate Commerce first took up three gubernatorial appointments and sent all three to the Senate floor with recommendations for confirmation: Salvador Cruz as director of the Department of Finance, Nora Carpenter to the Idaho Health Insurance Exchange Board, and Gregory Donica to the same board. Each motion passed without opposition. The committee then received an annual update from Pat Kelly, executive director of Your Health Idaho. He reported record enrollment activity, including more than 139,000 selections in open enrollment 2025 and over 144,000 in open enrollment 2026, with most enrollees receiving tax credits and many working with agents or brokers. Kelly said the exchange remains financially self-sustaining, has low operating costs, and achieved strong customer satisfaction scores. Members asked about rising premiums, the shift toward bronze plans, and enrollment timing; Kelly and later Insurance Director Dean Cameron said Idaho premiums remain among the lowest nationally, helped by the 1332 reinsurance waiver, though affordability concerns are increasing. The committee also reviewed and approved one Department of Commerce pending rule docket and several Department of Insurance rule dockets under zero-based regulation. The Commerce rulemaking was described as a non-substantive cleanup that removed obsolete language, aligned definitions, and adjusted some grant limits, including the Idaho GEM grant program. Insurance rule changes similarly focused on simplifying, clarifying, and removing duplicative statutory language across self-funded plans, long-term care insurance, small employer and individual health insurance, coordination of benefits, short-term health insurance, and managing general agents. The most notable policy-related change was the short-term health insurance docket, which was approved with an effective date upon adjournment to avoid a gap after a temporary rule expires; all dockets were approved unanimously.

Transcript Highlights:

• All in agreement say aye. Aye. Any nays?
• All right, all in agreement say aye. Aye. Any nays? Nope, ayes have it.
• All in agreement say aye. Any nays? Nope. Ayes have it.
• All in agreement, say aye. Any nays. Ayes have it. Docket 18-04-14-2501 is approved.
• All right, all in agreement say aye. Aye. Any opposed?

Committee: Senate Commerce and Human Resources

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm pleased to announce that we were able to reach agreement on 30 of the 35 articles.
• I think that we reached agreement on this article in our last bargaining session.
• I am pleased to announce that we reached agreement on the majority of the articles.
• We believe that even with this issue, we could come to an agreement with the state.
• Even with this issue, we believe that we could come to an agreement with the state and will be willing

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Summary: The Joint Select Committee on Collective Bargaining met to hear informational presentations on several state employee bargaining units at impasse. The Department of Management Services outlined the status of negotiations for FDLE special agents, correctional/security services, sworn law enforcement officers, Florida Highway Patrol troopers, and Florida State Fire Service employees. In each case, most contract articles had been resolved, but key disputes remained over wages and several non-economic provisions such as hours of work, grievance language, safety, grooming, seniority, equipment, travel, and on-call pay. DMS emphasized that the state had offered competitive pay increases, special pay, recruitment/retention funds in some units, and that insurance costs would remain unchanged for employees. Representatives for the Florida State Fire Service Association argued that the state was requiring firefighters to perform work far outside their job descriptions, including major construction and renovation, and that wildland firefighters were being undercompensated for long hours, on-call duty, and callback work. They also pressed for higher wages, an incentive-based pay plan, additional compensation for firefighter-EMTs, more protective clothing, and stronger decontamination and cancer-prevention measures. The Police Benevolent Association’s Florida Highway Patrol unit sought a larger career development plan, veteran stipends, broader grooming/tattoo allowances, improved vehicle safety, and more pay, while the law enforcement unit raised concerns about vehicle safety, performance evaluation quotas, and a $7,000 across-the-board raise. The security services unit representing correctional officers, probation officers, and ISS officers focused on a substantial wage increase, retention pay, special pay for death row and close management assignments, and overtime treatment for lieutenants and captains. Committee members asked only a few clarifying questions, including whether correctional officers receive overtime, which DMS confirmed they do. No votes were taken and no formal action was scheduled; the meeting was expressly for information only. The committee thanked the presenters, noted that the materials and testimony would be taken under advisement, and adjourned without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, and a power-sharing agreement. Uh, and the election of Donald Trump.
• Um and a power sharing agreement.<00:00:50.719><c> Uh</c><00:00:51.039><c> and</c><00:00:51.280><c> the
• </c><00:00:51.600><c> election</c><00:00:52.000><c> of</c><00:00:52.239><c> Donald</c> agreement.
• Uh and the election of Donald agreement.
• I think what helped us foster a better relationship this session was the early outreach and agreement

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That loss forced us into a power-sharing agreement that really forged what is now a much better working
• That loss forced us into a power-sharing agreement that really forged what is now a much better working
• That loss forced us into a power-sharing agreement that really forged what is now a much better working
• That loss forced us into a power-sharing agreement that really forged what is now a much better working
• That loss forced us into a power-sharing agreement that really forged what is now a much better working

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, actually first we'll go ahead and adopt the amendment that then reflects the agreement that the
• the author of the bill, move the adoption of the A25-000081 amendment as it reflects the council's agreement
• reflects the A25-000081 amendment as it reflects the council's<00:02:14.239><c> um</c><00:02:14.640><c> agreement
• and</c><00:02:15.840><c> puts</c><00:02:16.080><c> the</c><00:02:16.239><c> bill</c> council's um agreement
• and puts the bill council's um agreement and puts the bill in<00:02:16.560><c> the</c><00:02:16.720>

Committee: Senate Labor

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, we are in agreement on this one, I believe, and we can vote this out.
• So, we we we are<00:04:28.960><c> in</c><00:04:29.280><c> agreement</c><00:04:29.759><c> on</c><00:04
• > this</c><00:04:30.240><c> one,</c><00:04:30.479><c> I</c><00:04:30.720><c> believe,</c> are in agreement
• on this one, I believe, are in agreement on this one, I believe, and<00:04:31.840><c> we</c><00:04:32.000
• We are then in agreement with SB 15, House Draft 2, and we are ready to vote if it's okay with the House

Keywords: 912, senate, all