Video & Transcript Research : 'pay scale'
Page 41 of 500
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
Committee on Energy, Utilities, Environment and Climate - 03/26/25
Energy, Utilities, Environment, and Climate
Transcript Highlights:
- pay for other energy sources.
- Customers that would sign off on agreements would not pay more than they would otherwise pay for other
- We need a yes-and approach at all different scales.
- <00:56:50.240>
We approach at all different scales. We approach at all different scales. - It is scaling today.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- would also be eager to kind of disprove a claim that these investments in sustainability, which will pay
- Many of these under-resourced families are paying as much as a third of their income for housing, which
- To scale up, we're exploring network geothermal and other neighborhood electrification projects.
- So what I'm worried about, Senator, is that as we scale these options, we're not going to be talking
- Math is an equity content area, and we all need to pay attention to the numbers in our lives.
Summary:
The hearing focused on several climate and utility-related bills, especially H. 3449/S. 2292 to expand the municipal fossil fuel-free building demonstration program from 10 to 20 communities and related home rule petitions for Somerville and other municipalities. Witnesses from Somerville, Salem, Worcester, Cambridge, Newton, Arlington, Wellesley, Watertown, and the Massachusetts Municipal Association argued that local governments should be allowed to opt into fossil fuel-free or net-zero building standards, citing climate goals, environmental justice concerns, housing production, and data showing all-electric construction can cost about the same as or less than mixed-fuel construction. Committee members repeatedly pressed witnesses for cost data and asked for written follow-up, while also discussing whether strong environmental standards affect housing supply; witnesses responded that the main housing constraints are financing and that they would provide more data from local projects and state studies.
A second major topic was H. 3564, which would require gas companies to provide municipalities with detailed multi-year pipe replacement plans, allow local review and objections, and limit reimbursement for projects not previously disclosed except in emergencies. Municipal leaders and advocates said the bill would improve coordination of street work, reduce disruption and costs, and help cities plan for electrification, network geothermal, and non-pipeline alternatives. Testimony from Wellesley, Cambridge, Arlington, Newton, and others emphasized repeated problems with last-minute gas main work, the need for advance notice, and the value of municipal participation in planning gas system retirement and alternatives.
The committee also heard testimony on the “tactical transition” bills, S. 2249/H. 3539, aimed at managing the gas-to-clean-energy transition. Supporters from Gas Transition Allies, Rewiring America, and 350 Mass said the bills would require joint gas-electric planning, create an advisory council, eliminate subsidies for new gas hookups, shift investment toward repairs and clean alternatives, protect workers through retraining, and make utility plans more transparent. They argued these changes would reduce ratepayer costs, avoid stranded gas assets, and support orderly decarbonization. In addition, HEET testified on H. 3541, which would update greenhouse gas accounting to better reflect methane’s short-term climate impact, and H. 3543, which would establish a framework for managing shared thermal resources and thermal energy networks; committee members asked several questions about the meaning, ownership, and consumer-cost implications of the proposed “thermal commons.” No votes were taken during the hearing.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Delivery of Government Efficiency Mar 12th, 2025
Delivery of Government Efficiency
Transcript Highlights:
- On top of that, we pay $400 per vehicle.
- That are paying vendor fees? Yeah.
- The cities and counties. school districts pay no vendor fees on the Viaport. What fees do they pay?
- So the school districts pay dues to TASA, the school districts pay dues to TASB.
- a $400 fee that the vendor would be paying the $400.
Keywords:
regulatory reform, government efficiency, administrative law, rulemaking, agency deference, judicial review, de novo review, Texas Government Code, Administrative Procedure Act, state agencies, plain language, regulatory burden, regulatory reduction, cost-benefit analysis, fiscal note, public benefits and costs, contested case, rule challenge, Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office, advisory panel
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
AGR Public Hearing - Fri Feb 7, 2025 @ 9:30 AM HST
Agriculture & Food Systems
Transcript Highlights:
- Again, we want to give some flexibility as the department scales up, and the presumption is it might
- Farmers have the ability to scale up so that we aren't importing so much flowers, especially for lei,
- We all have to pay for transportation costs whether we like it or not.
- Thank you, Vice Chair. to pay for transportation costs whether to pay for transportation costs whether
- one there was a focus on large scale one there was a focus on large scale agriculture<01:53:07.480
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- No more equal pay for equal work. Instead, personalized wages to pay you less.
- No more equal pay for equal work. take. No more equal pay for equal work.
- to understand its scale today. to understand its scale today.
- their rent, to pay their house, to pay medical debt.
- house, to pay medical rent, to pay their house, to pay medical debt.<01:24:22.240>
It <01:24:22.520
Keywords:
airport workers, wage standards, labor rights, minimum wage, economic equity, surveillance, price discrimination, wage discrimination, consumer rights, automated decision systems, Minnesota Statutes, suitable seating, employee seating, workplace seating, occupational safety, workplace safety, labor standards, employer requirements, chair, stool
ND
North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Legacy and Budget Stabilization Fund Advisory Board Mar 31st, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm doing that because we had to scale the program up.
- The net benefit is almost $9 million after paying those? That's correct.
- Representative Kempinick: At what point on scaling this up do the efficiencies disappear?
- There are certain strategies, potentially, if we had to scale.
- I believe our current scale kind of runs out at around 30%.
Summary:
The committee met to approve prior minutes and receive updates on the Legacy Fund transparency website and fund performance. Staff reported the website procurement was in contract negotiations, with a planned go-live around November 1, and that the site would provide downloadable, more transparent information on fund holdings, allocations, history, and legislative appropriations while protecting confidential data. The investment office then reviewed performance through January 2026, describing strong returns relative to benchmarks, noting real estate and fixed income as weaker areas, and explaining that the fund’s diversification and internal management had helped offset market volatility, including recent geopolitical impacts.
Members also discussed the in-state investment program, especially the Bank of North Dakota’s CD-match allocation. Several members questioned whether the program had been static for years and whether the uncommitted balance should remain parked there if it was not being used. The committee voted to pause further transfers into the program until the Bank provides a report and the committee can consider possible statutory changes; the motion also requested a cost-benefit analysis from RVK, and it passed by roll call vote.
In the afternoon, RVK presented its review of the investment policy statement as it relates to the in-state investment program. The consultant said it found no major policy impediments, and that implementers and stakeholders generally felt the program was proceeding as intended. RVK emphasized best practices such as third-party due diligence, competitive risk-adjusted returns, diversification, pacing, and exit strategies, while cautioning that required lower-return investments or spending commitments can create pressure on the fund’s long-term real value. The consultant also raised ancillary concerns about state-level concentration risk, the need to distinguish between public and commercial infrastructure, and the lack of a central repository for all state funding commitments to the same projects.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
Hearings to examine improving the Federal environmental review and permitting processes. Feb 19th, 2025 at 09:15 am
Environment and Public Works Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- drive-up in costs, these delays, not just for the projects but for the American families who are paying
- Because it's American workers that pay the price.
- You kind of outlined it in your statement, saying you can't pay the worker if you can't move forward.
- jobs, but our permitting process led them to delay or scale back. the planned investments.
- If we're going to deploy any small modular reactors and advanced reactors, the scale of rising demand
Keywords:
environmental review, permitting process, infrastructure, bipartisan legislation, economic growth, Nucor, West Virginia
Summary:
The meeting focused on critical discussions surrounding the need for modernizing the federal environmental review and permitting processes. Witnesses from various sectors, including Nucor, provided testimony on the delays and costs associated with current regulations, emphasizing the impact on infrastructure and economic growth. Major projects in West Virginia, such as the Corridor H and Coalfield Expressways, were highlighted as examples of initiatives stalled by excessive permitting hurdles, prompting calls for bipartisan legislation to streamline these processes while maintaining environmental protections. The committee expressed a commitment to address these issues immediately, highlighting the urgency to enhance efficiency in permitting to facilitate economic development.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- The new academic building is also being imagined to feature a large-scale gathering space.
- The new academic building is also being imagined to feature a large-scale gathering space.
- The new academic building is also being imagined to feature a large-scale gathering space.
- imagined to feature a large-scale imagined to feature a large-scale gathering<00:58:26.280>
space - How can we get more Minnesotans into high-paying jobs?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- In terms of the bill, the reason why it is important to us is the scale.
- Simply put, scale allows for more energy-efficient infrastructure to be put in place, and we're here
- They're paying a mortgage, they're paying property taxes, they're working in the schools.
- to police officer pay.
- pay of a pilot or the pay of a surgeon, and that might seem ridiculous, but those are some of the comparables
Bills:
HB386, HB1449, HB1701, HB2142, HB2675, HB2857, HB3063, HB3171, HB3641, HB3732, HB4045, HB4370, HB4491, HB4505, HB4626, HB5267, HB5356
Keywords:
construction contracts, change orders, local government, budget limits, Texas legislation, HB 1449, mobile food vendors, food trucks, mobile food service establishments, permits, county health permit, municipal permitting, Health and Safety Code Chapter 437A, Chapter 437, inspection agreements, permit reciprocity, fee cap, preemption, large counties, population over one million
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- To give you all an example, most of my residents pay 3 policies flood, property, and windstorm.
- In the aftermath of Hurricane Ike in 2008, TWA premiums from 2010, 2011 and 2012 were used to pay off
- a sense of, of how much that debt costs and what it does in terms of paying, paying losses for Tua.
- We pay that even although we're also paying our own losses, uh, in the private sector after a storm.
- A surcharges to pay it back.
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Appropriations Committee on Higher Education Feb 5th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- EDUCATION AND SPEND SOME OF THE TIME LOOKING AT THE FUNDING TOOLS WE HAVE AVAILABLE THAT HAVE HELPED US SCALE
- REALLY THE FLORIDA SYSTEMS HAVE THE ABILITY TO WORK WITH INDUSTRY TO SET UP THE CTE AND ADVANCE AND SCALE
- THE NEXT PROGRAM I WANT TO TALK ABOUT HAS REALLY BEEN AN INSTRUMENTAL PROGRAM IN HOW WE HAVE SCALED CTE
- ANOTHER PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE FUNDING OPTION WE HAVE HAS BEEN OUR PAY PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE FUND.
- HOW DO WE PAY FOR THE TEACHERS? THAT'S WHERE WE USE WORKFORCE FUNDING THAT YOU HAVE.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on Transportation. (7-1-26)
Transcript Highlights:
- Don't have to do that no more, but sales tax we pay, property tax we pay.
- Don't have to do that no more, but sales tax we pay, property tax we pay.
- Uh, and you property tax we pay.
- <00:29:37.200>
And <00:29:37.360>scaling really in the scale, right? - And scaling really in the scale, right?
Summary:
The Budget Review Subcommittee on Transportation met with a quorum, approved the June 3, 2026 minutes, and then heard a presentation from Mike Proctor of Evolve Kentucky on electric vehicles and charging infrastructure. Proctor described Evolve Kentucky as a nonprofit formed in 2016 to promote EV adoption and charger deployment, said the group has helped place more than 135 chargers at 65 locations, and reported that Kentucky EV registrations have grown rapidly but still represent about 1% of the state’s roughly 3 million vehicles. He also outlined the group’s view that EV drivers and charger operators already contribute to state revenue through annual vehicle fees, charger taxes, utility taxes, and related business taxes, and cited figures showing rising revenue collections as EV adoption increases.
A major theme of the presentation was that EV owners are paying their “fair share” rather than being overcharged. Proctor said the current $126 annual EV fee is roughly comparable to the fuel tax a typical gasoline vehicle would pay, and noted that public charging can add additional tax burdens for drivers who cannot charge at home, such as those living in apartments or condos. He also argued that EVs provide broader benefits, including lower noise and air pollution, grid-stabilizing nighttime charging, tourism spending at destination chargers, and reduced road wear for passenger EVs compared with much heavier vehicles.
Members questioned Proctor about whether EV owners are paying more than their fair share, how the fee compares with gasoline taxes, and whether apartment and condo residents are disproportionately affected because they rely on public chargers. Proctor responded that the fee was intended to bring EV owners into parity with gas vehicles, not to overcharge them, and said some public chargers are free while others are used by drivers who cannot charge at home. No additional votes or formal actions were taken beyond the minutes approval.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government
Transcript Highlights:
- If that gets eroded easily, in my case my tenant stopped paying, so I had to pay that mortgage and pay
- Okay, so they escrow everything so that they can pay your taxes, so that they can pay your insurance.
- Okay, so they escrow everything so that they can pay your taxes, so that they can pay your insurance.
- Then I could pay a car rent, a record for RAF. So I can't pay that rent.
- Those are clients that don't pay rent. Those housing units are clients that don't pay rent.
Summary:
The Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government held a long public hearing focused mainly on two sets of issues: proposals to amend or repeal the MBTA Communities Act, and bills to allow local rent stabilization. Committee chairs opened by explaining the hearing would be tightly managed because of the very large number of speakers, with testimony limited to two minutes per person and written testimony still accepted by email. Members and witnesses were called in a mix of in-person and virtual order throughout the hearing.
On the MBTA Communities Act, several legislators and local officials argued the law is too rigid and should be revised to account for local conditions. Speakers from small, rural, or infrastructure-limited communities such as Hanson, Halifax, Marshfield, Winthrop, Dracut, Carver, Rehoboth, and others said the law’s one-size-fits-all approach does not fit towns with limited water, sewer, transit access, or buildable land. Some filed bills would repeal the law, exempt certain communities, or create appeals processes based on infrastructure, environmental, or historical constraints. Supporters of the law’s changes emphasized local control and the need to avoid forcing development where communities believe it is impractical or inconsistent with town character.
A large portion of the hearing was devoted to rent stabilization legislation, especially S. 1447 and related House bills. Supporters included legislators, city councilors, tenant advocates, labor leaders, housing nonprofits, public health organizations, and residents who described sharp rent increases, displacement, homelessness risk, and the strain on working families, seniors, students, and people with disabilities. They argued local-option rent stabilization would let municipalities cap excessive increases and prevent no-fault evictions while preserving flexibility for local conditions. Opponents, including small landlords and property owners, said rent control would discourage investment, worsen housing quality, burden responsible owners, and drive small landlords out of the market. Some witnesses also supported a Cape Cod/Island transfer fee bill and a suburban infrastructure fund, arguing those would provide local revenue for housing or roads. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the hearing.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Legislative Finance Aug 19th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- I think when we add infrastructure, we get economies of scale.
- So that's how they do cost recovery and pay for that.
- If not, you have to pay for it.
- They don't want us to rip them off, and they're willing to pay that bill.
- I think it's going to be a matter of scale and pace.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- And I was like, oh, are you going to pay cash for it? Oh, uh, are you going to pay cash for it?
- Pay cash? Like, total poor person fumble. You would never pay cash when you could get a mortgage.
- <01:10:25.320>
scale <01:10:25.480>do <01:10:25.600>you <01:10:25.719>pay - <01:10:25.840>
a <01:10:25.960>greater income scale scale do you pay a greater income - scale scale do you pay a greater percentage<01:10:27.480>
of <01:10:27.760>of <01:10:27.920
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- the taxes on it and they're going to have to pay the royalties on it.
- Operators having to pay money? Yes, sir, to offload their gas.
- We've got growth in production, and we've got scale and speed to scale, which is making a...
- We've got growth in production, and we've got scale and speed to scale, which is making a big difference
- They actually go to other agencies that pay better within the state.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Education Finance Apr 29th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- And as you can see on page four of your agenda, it has two different rates that it pays based on the
- We need to scale and accelerate the right public ones.
- Unlike larger CSU campuses, smaller campuses do not benefit from this economy of scale.
- CSU campuses, smaller campuses do not benefit from this economy of scale.
- And these cuts, we believe, do not take into consideration economies of scale.
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on three education budget items: the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP), differentiated assistance/statewide system of support, and universal school meals plus kitchen infrastructure grants. For ELOP, the Department of Finance described the Governor’s proposal to provide $4.7 billion ongoing Proposition 98 funding and $62.4 million to set a minimum Tier 2 rate of $1,800 per pupil. The LAO recommended instead fixing the Tier 2 rate at $1,579, and committee members questioned how the rate was determined, how much funding is actually spent, and whether overlapping funding from ELOP, ACEs, and 21st Century programs is being tracked. CDE said ELOP is showing positive attendance and math outcomes, but some requested data will not be available until mid-2027; members also raised concerns about double-funding, transparency, and whether middle and high school students are being equitably served.
On differentiated assistance, CCEE outlined the statewide system of support and the various tiers of universal, targeted, supplemental, and intensive assistance. Finance explained the Governor’s proposal to replace the current DA structure with a more stable universal and targeted assistance model, funded at $131.9 million ongoing, with a three-year support cycle aligned to LCAP and ESSA timelines and broader State Board authority to revise eligibility criteria. The LAO objected to considering the proposal before the State Board finalizes the new performance criteria, and committee members expressed concern that moving to a three-year cycle could delay support for LEAs that newly fall into need mid-cycle. There was also discussion about whether the proposal would weaken subgroup-based equity guardrails or give the State Board too much discretion over who qualifies for support.
For school meals and kitchen infrastructure, Finance proposed $1.8 billion ongoing for universal meals and an additional $100 million ongoing plus $100 million one-time for a fourth round of kitchen infrastructure and training grants. The LAO recommended rejecting the new kitchen grant round because prior rounds are still being spent and the unmet need is not yet clear. CDE said prior investments have improved meal participation, efficiency, and menu variety, but many schools still lack the facilities for scratch cooking and face construction, electrical, and procurement barriers. Members asked for more data on how prior grants were used, which schools are benefiting, and whether funds could also support lower-cost food access strategies such as pantries, while noting federal restrictions on some meal-service innovations.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- pay if we go pay who really going to pay if we go after<00:37:55.720>
these <00:37:55.920>rich - pay pay us<00:38:03.119>
I <00:38:03.280>this <00:38:03.440>do <00:38:03.880> - paying the tax.
- through entity is paying the the pass through entity is paying the tax<00:50:21.880>
and <00:50 - the federal level you still have to pay the federal level you still have to pay it<00:50:50.960>
Summary:
The committee took up House Bill 422, relating to school impact fees. The Education Committee recommended passage with amendments, and Ways and Means concurred. The amendments would repeal the construction fee component of the school impact fee while retaining the land impact fee and in-lieu fee requirements, remove related statutory language, exempt certain developments from school impact fees, raise the unit threshold for satisfying the land component to 100 units, require the School Facilities Authority to adopt rules and policies, and require a report to the Legislature on the effect of repealing the construction portion of the fee. The measure was also given a sunset date of June 30, 2029, with the committee report to note that the changes are intended to test the efficiency and efficacy of the fee structure and could be made permanent if the report supports that outcome. The committees adopted the recommendation, with one senator initially voting no and then changing to yes after the amendments were explained.
The meeting also included a separate hearing on House Bill 1155, concerning procurement for Department of Transportation projects and construction manager/general contractor procurement. DOT testified that it supported the concept but wanted to narrow the bill, saying the current language was too broad and that the goal was to allow more innovative procurement while preserving selection safeguards. The State Procurement Office said it supported the bill’s language but was willing to work with DOT on alternative wording. Several construction-related organizations, including subcontractors, iron workers, elevator constructors, and building trades representatives, opposed the bill, arguing that exemptions from the procurement code would weaken protections such as retainage, equality, and prompt payment and could invite favoritism or corruption. In response to those concerns, the chair proposed amendments limiting the exemption to DOT, narrowing the qualifying contracts, adding a two-year sunset, requiring a report after the first year, and clarifying that project management could not be procured under the section. The amended recommendation passed, though several members voted with reservations.
A separate item, House Bill 476, was briefly called up at the end of the agenda, with a recommendation to pass with amendments to increase a rate from 7.25% to 8%, but discussion was not completed in the portion of the transcript provided.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- mean, if you have a pay-as-you-go mean, if you have a pay-as-you-go philosophy,<00:42:58.240>
- We are in the one large-scale facility.
- It was just a smaller scale project we were able to get funded.
- And we think, you know, regionalization works best due to economies of scale.
- And we think, you know, regionalization works best due to economies of scale.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Science, Technology and Energy (03/04/2025)
Science, Technology and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- whereas consumer utility costs are increasingly burdensome and warrant detailed scrutiny of large-scale
- <00:07:43.960>
Utility <00:07:44.440>Systems of large-scale Utility Systems of large-scale - <00:37:18.400>
for because the rate payers are paying for because the rate payers are paying - It does put the finger on the scale, and I am still very hesitant about that.
- <03:47:21.960>
uh come and build uh that small scale uh come and build uh that small scale