Video & Transcript : 'deed ownership' :
Page 41 of 288
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Banking and Finance Committee May 5th, 2025
Banking and Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- Under current law, a mortgage or deed of trust can only serve as a fixture filing if the debtor's name
- It allows a mortgage or deed of trust to serve as a fixture filing. without requiring an exact ID name
- So, as was just explained, in 44 states, the mortgage or deed of trust itself can serve as a fixture
- In 44 states, the mortgage or deed of trust is a done deal; you don't have to do the separate fixture
- Also, as a practical matter, a mortgage or deed of trust can be effective for 60 years, while a fixture
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House DFL Press Conference 3/10/25
Transcript Highlights:
- We have no indications, and we've been in constant communication with DEED.
- We had DEED come to testify in our Workforce Committee specifically to those points.
- We heard this from DEED. That's all true.
- Turns out, when DEED came in, we had lots of questions and verified that, yes, it is ready to go.
- that's all true that hearing from deed that's all true that hearing actually<00:14:19.480><c> came</
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
House Standing Committee on Licensing, Occupations, and Administrative Regulations.(3-18-26)
Licensing, Occupations, & Administrative Regulations
Transcript Highlights:
- Representative Deeds. >> Here. Representative Donworth. >> Here. Representative Fister.
- Representative Deeds. Yes. Representative Donworth. Yes. Representative Fister. Yes.
- Representative Deeds. Yes. Representative Donworth. Yes. Representative Fister. Yes.
- Representative<00:13:59.160><c> Deeds.</c> Representative Deeds. Representative Deeds.
- Representative<00:16:30.360><c> Deeds.</c> Representative Deeds. Representative Deeds.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Conference Committee on S.F. 1832 - Jobs and Labor Omnibus - 05/13/25
Transcript Highlights:
- I'll just begin with DEED.
- So on line 188 in this division of deed.
- </c><00:15:49.839><c> Uh</c> training programs under deed. Uh training programs under deed.
- </c><00:26:13.840><c> On</c> training programs division of deed.
- On training programs division of deed.
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships May 5th, 2025
S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships
Transcript Highlights:
- deed or TODD.
- Transfer on death deeds are a simple way for homeowners to transfer their property upon their death,
- The deeds offer important flexibility.
- homebuyers with information on transfer on death deeds, how they interact with wills, and the impact
- As we heard, it costs about $15,000 to get that deed uncloudy, if you will.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Jobs and Economic Development - Part 2 - 04/02/25
Jobs and Economic Development
Transcript Highlights:
- Senator Pratt asked whether Senator Latz had talked to DEED and whether DEED had said anything about
- He said he had talked with DEED, and DEED felt the amendment was not necessary because, in practice,
- </c> request was maybe we could talk to deed request was maybe we could talk to deed about<00:10:20.560
- </c> rehabilitation services program at deed rehabilitation services program at deed this<01:26:32.320
- </c><01:29:30.119><c> that</c> 3032 vs is a program under deed that 3032 vs is a program under deed that
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Fiscal Policy Apr 22nd, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Those who commit these depraved acts deserve a very severe punishment deed.
- in or out of network to the same time when they refer their patients to facility that they have ownership
- be facility most likely where >> they have a financial interest mean they would have a degree of ownership
- But that's if they if they had 100% ownership, for example, that's just one example.
- getting hit with things like facility charges or additional charges that they're not expecting that ownership
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
2026 Legislative Session - Day Thirty One - Tuesday, March 3 - Morning Session
Missouri House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- This would apply to all old deeds as well as new deeds.
- This would apply to all old deeds as well as new deeds.
- It says to remove restrictions on deeds. Okay, great.
- It eliminates deed restrictions.
- It is not just a deed restriction bill.
Summary:
The House first approved the previous day’s journal by roll call vote, 116-0, and then spent a long portion of the morning recognizing visiting students, homeschool groups, professional associations, veterans, and other guests in the gallery. A moment of silence was held in honor of Conrad Ashcraft after a member introduced his grandmother, who was present to testify on a bill related to his death. The chamber also recognized a birthday page, a 90th birthday for a House staff member, and Chiropractic Physicians Day.
The main floor debate centered on House Committee Substitute for House Bill 2710, which would create an A-through-F school grading system for public schools and charter schools. Supporters said the bill would give parents a simple, transparent way to understand school performance, while also preserving more detailed underlying data and adding a climate scorecard amendment covering suspension, restraint, and satisfaction measures. The bill sponsor and supporters emphasized that the measure was revised from earlier versions, that the A grade would be based on the top decile rather than a moving target, that literacy and growth measures were important, and that any teacher incentive funding would be handled through appropriations and the teacher retention and recruitment fund rather than direct bonuses.
Opponents argued that letter grades would stigmatize schools, destabilize staffing, and oversimplify complex school conditions, especially in districts with high poverty, mobility, or special education populations. Several members questioned the fairness of comparing schools with different funding levels, demographics, and student turnover, and others argued that the bill would not solve concerns about the MAP test or broader school funding. One member objected that the bill applied only to public and charter schools while state dollars are also now going to private-school tuition support. Despite those concerns, the House adopted the amendment offered by the St. Louis member, then adopted the committee substitute and ordered House Bill 2710 perfected and printed.
Afterward, the House took up House Committee Substitute for House Bills 2404 and 2172, a measure to remove deed restrictions on unused public school property and create a right of first refusal for public entities, including charter schools. Supporters said the bill would allow vacant school buildings to be reused for education rather than sit unused or be demolished, and could generate revenue for school districts. The bill was advanced after discussion, with members citing examples from St. Louis and other areas where unused buildings could have been repurposed for charter or other educational use.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Deed fraud and title theft, sometimes called real property theft or property fraud, are growing crimes
- Deed fraud and title theft, sometimes called real property theft or property fraud, are growing crimes
- statutes are not designed to prosecute deed fraud or title theft because of the complex nature of the
- We combine the civil deed fraud work with the criminal deed fraud work in order to get it done in this
- The remainder of the bill addresses criminal aspects of deed fraud and title theft, and with a couple
Summary:
The Senate convened with an invocation and then handled several procedural matters, including a failed motion to excuse Senator Johnson’s absence after a roll-call vote. The chamber also postponed the reading and referral of bills until later in the calendar and adopted motions allowing the Education K-16 Committee to meet while the Senate was in session. The Senate then recessed until 4:00 p.m. Wednesday, August 6.
The main floor action centered on Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 9, which lowers the voter-approval tax rate for certain cities and counties from 3.5% to 2.5% for maintenance and operations. Senator Bettencourt argued the bill would slow local property tax growth and align city and county limits more closely with school district limits, while Senators Hinojosa and Menendez raised concerns about reduced local revenue, public safety funding, and the short time for cities to assess the impact. The Senate suspended the regular order, passed the bill to engrossment, suspended the constitutional three-day rule, and finally passed SB 9, with a clarification later entered that the final passage vote was 18-3.
The Senate also took up Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 7, the Texas Women’s Privacy Act, which sets state policy for the use of certain spaces and facilities according to biological sex and creates enforcement mechanisms for state agencies and political subdivisions. Supporters said the bill was needed to protect women and children in restrooms, locker rooms, shelters, prisons, and schools, while opponents questioned the scope, enforcement, civil penalties, and possible conflicts with federal law and local control. After extensive questioning, the chamber adopted a clarifying amendment, suspended the three-day rule, and finally passed SB 7 by a vote of 19-2.
Finally, the Senate passed Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 15, which addresses deed fraud and real property theft by tightening recording requirements for certain property documents and creating new criminal offenses for real property theft and fraud. Senator Hinojosa explained that the bill combined civil and criminal provisions, added photo ID requirements for in-person filings, and included restitution and enhanced penalties for certain victims and properties; a floor amendment made cleanup changes, removed a training mandate, and clarified that electronic and mail filings were not affected. The Senate adopted the amendment, suspended the three-day rule, and passed SB 15 unanimously, 21-0.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- So Vail again purchased deed restrictions in some condos that were put up for rent.
- So Vail again purchased deed restrictions in some condos that were put up for rent.
- So Vail again purchased deed restrictions in some condos that were put up for rent.
- So Vail again purchased deed restrictions in some condos that were put up for rent.
- The, um, the price of deed-restricted homes in Vail versus non-deed-restricted homes. >> Uh, I don't
Bills:
HB1977, HB1764, HB1934, HB2533, HB1790, HB2181, HB1870, HB2140, HB2468, HB2358, HB1588, HB1688, HB1986, HB2030, HB2195, HB1949, HB1695, HB1950, HB2094, HB2115, HB2297, HB2336, HB2416, HB2049
Keywords:
maternal health, infant health, mobile application, Medicaid, healthcare access, state programs, music education, public concerts, Hawaii State Library, cultural collaboration, music accessibility, libraries, education, reading programs, early childhood, nonprofit, community engagement, teacher retention, Hawaiian language education, special needs schools
VA
Transcript Highlights:
- exchange for that, what we did in the House, we also asked them to exempt from taxation certain quitclaim deeds
- for no consideration and deeds to correct fraudulent deeds, and that's what the conference report does
- for that, what we did in the House, we also asked them to exempt from taxation certain quick claim deeds
- for no consideration and deeds to correct fraudulent deeds, and that's what the conference report does
- . deeds for no consideration and deeds to correct fraudulent deeds and that's what the conference report
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 5/6/25
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Of this amount, there was a cut of $52,746,000 for DEED. That's on line three.
- Article three, this is the deed items.
- Article three, this is the deed policy<00:18:51.000><c> section.
- </c> the governor's recommendations for deed. the governor's recommendations for deed.
- </c> funding at deed proposed in this bill. funding at deed proposed in this bill.
Keywords:
workers' compensation, insurance programs, employee protection, Minnesota statutes, safety regulations, prevailing wage, certified payroll, payroll reporting, construction contracts, public works, project registration, labor standards, contractor compliance, subcontractor reporting, state government, Department of Administration, Commissioner of Labor and Industry, Metropolitan Council, highway construction, public construction
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Workforce, labor and economic development panel hears HF1965 3/27/25
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- programs, and through a competitive process, nonprofit economic development organizations contract with DEED
- so we can track the impact these deed so we can track the impact these dollars<00:03:36.720><c> have
- We gave the money to DEED.
- We gave the money to DEED.
- We gave the money to DEED.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- President, is transfer-on-death deeds.
- A transfer-on-death deed is a deed that transfers real property to a named beneficiary when the owner
- President, is transfer-on-death deeds.
- A transfer-on-death deed is a deed that transfers real property to a named beneficiary when the owner
- President, made it easier to fix mistakes for recorded deeds.
WV
West Virginia 2026 Regular Session
WV Senate Judiciary Committee in Session Mar 10th, 2026 at 03:04 pm
Judiciary
Transcript Highlights:
- Senator Deeds? Aye. Senator Deeds? Senator Fuller? No. Senator Fuller? Senator Garcia? Yeah.
- The purpose of this section was to get at the deeds that counties have in their record room.
- So it shouldn't affect the physical deeds.
- For digital copies of those deeds, perhaps that may be a consideration.
- . ...or other documents associated with that deed.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Meeting: Senate Committee and House Committee on Capital Investment - 05/17/26
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, 154 million for DEED, which is mostly local projects.
- And DEED needs more money in that program.
- And DEED needs more money in that program.
- And DEED needs more money in that program.
- > money</c><00:31:30.440><c> in</c><00:31:30.520><c> that</c> uh DEED needs more money in that uh DEED
Summary:
The committee took up a large bonding bill and reviewed the final spreadsheet of capital investments. Chairs and members repeatedly thanked staff, House and Senate negotiators, and the Governor’s team for a collaborative process. The bill was described as a statewide package rather than a partisan one, with major funding for higher education asset preservation, DNR projects, public safety, transportation, the Met Council, veterans facilities, corrections, DEED/local projects, and a large water infrastructure section.
House Fiscal staff and Senate fiscal staff walked through the bill line by line. Highlights included University of Minnesota and Minnesota State asset preservation, education and language immersion school funding, DNR trail and flood mitigation projects, public safety facilities, local road and bridge grants, Met Council parks and I/I grants, veterans home and armory funding, corrections projects including the Faribault vocational expansion, and many local economic development and public facility projects across Greater Minnesota and the metro. The bill also included Public Facilities Authority water and wastewater grants, housing rehabilitation funding, historical society grants, a Minnesota Zoo operating transfer, airport appropriations, and several cancellations of prior appropriations to help finance the package.
Members generally praised the bill and the bipartisan work behind it. Some Republicans emphasized the one-time license fee reduction and affordability, while also saying DEED’s business development infrastructure funding was too low. Senator Nelson highlighted long-awaited transportation projects such as Highway 14 and township roads. Senator Dibble supported the transportation investments but criticized the bill for having no transit funding, calling that a major omission. No vote was recorded in the excerpt, but the discussion centered on final review and support for moving the bonding bill forward.
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
2026 Legislative Session - Day Thirty One - Tuesday, March 3 - Morning Session
Missouri House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- This would apply to all old deeds as well as new deeds.
- This would apply to all old deeds, as well as new deeds.
- It says to remove restrictions on deeds.” “Okay, great.
- It eliminates deed restrictions. The bill says on line, your first page. Yes.
- It is not just a deed restriction bill.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
- prior to would need to be on the deed prior to would need to be on the deed prior to the death is that
- but if uh if the husband was the deed but if uh if the husband was the deed but if uh if the husband
- they need to be on the deed they need to be on the deed then okay so they could actually go on then
- times uh people will deed and and often times uh people will deed and and often times uh people will
- they just may wife they are on the deed they just may wife they are on the deed they just may not be
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
HWN-EIG, HWN, HWN-HOU, HOU DEFER Public Hearings 02-04-2025
Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- belong to a lot of and original Deeds belong to a lot of you<00:14:25.040><c> guys</c><00:14:25.320>
- the property owner to be a negotiated amount up to the appraised value, to allow second position for deed
- conditions, covenants, and restrictions are in the first position, and to clarify that 201-C for the deed
- the property owner to be a negotiated amount up to the appraised value, to allow second position for deed
- restriction applies to both the primary residents and the ... ... and to clarify that 201-C for the deed
Summary:
The joint hearing focused primarily on Senate Bill 1409, which would cap county user fees charged to Department of Hawaiian Home Lands beneficiaries. Department of Hawaiian Home Lands supported the measure, arguing it would reduce monthly housing-related costs for lower-income beneficiaries and help make homesteading more affordable. Several testifiers, including the Tax Foundation of Hawaii and some individuals, also submitted comments or support. County and city water and sewer agencies, including the County of Kauai Department of Water, the City and County of Honolulu Department of Facility Maintenance, the Honolulu Board of Water Supply, and the City and County Department of Environmental Services, strongly opposed the bill, saying it would shift substantial costs to other ratepayers, create lost revenue, and could force fee increases for everyone else. They also raised concerns about the bill’s cap structure and potential misuse, while noting their systems are funded by user fees rather than taxes.
During committee discussion, Honolulu Board of Water Supply officials estimated about 4,500 DHHL customers on Oʻahu and projected lost revenue of roughly $30 million to $36 million over five years, with larger cumulative impacts over time; they said any waiver would be absorbed by other customers. The County of Hawaiʻi representative estimated nearly 2,000 DHHL customers on the Big Island and about $2.4 million in annual lost revenue. DHHL responded that it is pursuing revenue-generating projects on unused lands, but members questioned whether the department should do more to generate its own revenue and suggested looking at other affordability mechanisms, including market rent on commercial properties or a similar cap on other beneficiary fees. After hearing the testimony and discussion, the committee chair announced the recommendation to defer SB 1409 indefinitely, and the Committee on Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs agreed with that decision.
The hearing then moved to Senate Bill 1408, a housekeeping measure. DHHL testified in support, saying the bill was part of an effort to lower housing costs through a modular manufacturing approach. DHHL described plans to use an unused hangar at Kalaeloa for a potential modular housing manufacturing plant, including discussions with the University of Hawaiʻi and a Denver-based company, and said it was also exploring a pilot project with Habitat for Humanity on Maui. No vote or final action on SB 1408 was taken in the portion of the transcript provided.
WV
West Virginia 2026 Regular Session
WV Senate Judiciary Committee in Session Mar 10th, 2026 at 03:04 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- Are we suggesting that they're going to go into a deed book... ...other places?
- So it shouldn't affect the physical deeds.
- So it shouldn't affect the physical deeds.
- For digital copies of those deeds, perhaps that may be a consideration.
- with that deed.
Summary:
The committee first took up House Bill 4198, which would require employers to use E-Verify to confirm new hires’ work authorization and impose escalating penalties for violations, including warnings, debarment from state contracts, loss of business licenses, and other sanctions. Counsel and senators raised extensive drafting concerns, including circular language, conflicts with existing record-retention provisions, unclear references to “seeks to employ,” possible application to babysitters, lawn care, and other casual or household arrangements, and uncertainty about how the bill would work for employers who never actually complete a hire. The bill sponsor defended the measure as a way to strengthen compliance with existing law, protect employers who use E-Verify in good faith, and deter illegal hiring. After debate, a motion to table the bill failed on a roll call vote, 6 in favor and 10 opposed, and the chair then announced the bill would be sent to a subcommittee to be cleaned up, with instructions to resolve the drafting conflicts and other ambiguities.
The committee then turned to House Bill 4710, with an amendment, which would require a person to be registered with a political party or as an independent 210 days before filing a certificate of candidacy. Counsel explained that the change would lengthen the current 60-day requirement and would affect both party-switching and independent candidacies, making it harder for candidates to change affiliation shortly before an election. Senators asked about how the 210-day period would work relative to the primary and general election filing deadlines, and counsel clarified that it would be measured backward from the relevant filing dates. The discussion focused on the practical effect of the bill as a “sore loser” measure and on the timing rules for candidacy filings.