Transcript Highlights:

• We will now take up a late-filed amendment.
• Is there objection to taking up the late-filed amendment?
• We will now take up, we have a late filed amendment.
• Is there objection to taking up the late filed amendment?
• And that’s why I filed this amendment. Are there questions on the amendment?

Bills: S0194 , S1246

Committee: Senate Education Postsecondary

Keywords: Charlie Kirk, remembrance, free speech, civic engagement, youth leadership, nursing shortage, health care, education funding, workforce development, LINE Fund, monetary contributions, nonmonetary contributions

Summary: The Committee on Education Postsecondary met with a quorum and first considered SB 1246, which would expand Florida’s Line Fund for health service workforce shortages. Senator Davis explained that the bill would broaden eligibility beyond nursing to include health science education programs and students, allow matching funds from private contributions, and permit use of funds for scholarships, faculty recruitment, equipment, simulation centers, and facility renovations. Senator Harrell asked for more specificity about which professions would qualify, and Davis said the bill was intended to add flexibility but could be made more concrete. Several witnesses supported the bill, and the committee reported SB 1246 favorably without additional funding being requested. The committee then took up SB 194, which would designate October 14 as Charlie Kirk Day of Remembrance. Senator Martin said the bill would recognize Kirk’s influence on civic engagement, youth leadership, and constitutional education without creating a state holiday. The bill drew both support and opposition from public speakers, with supporters emphasizing Kirk’s advocacy for free speech and unborn children, and opponents arguing that his public statements on race, civil rights, and Black leaders made him an inappropriate figure for state honor. Members also debated whether statute was the right vehicle for such recognition and whether the bill could encourage future requests for similar commemorations. A late-filed amendment by Senator Jones would have added George Floyd to the remembrance language, framing the issue as selective remembrance and pointing to Floyd’s death as another national reckoning. Senator Martin opposed the amendment as unfriendly, and it failed on a roll call vote. The committee then debated SB 194 at length, with supporters describing Kirk as a defender of open debate and opponents saying the bill would legitimize divisive rhetoric. The committee ultimately reported SB 194 favorably, with Senators Berman, Harrell, and Jones voting no, Senator Rodriguez and Chair Simon voting yes, and Chair Calatayud casting the deciding favorable vote. The committee then adjourned after a motion to record Tab 2 in the affirmative was adopted.

Transcript Highlights:

• Several amendments have been filed, which will be considered at this time.
• And I also want to thank the gentleman from Gloucester for filing this amendment and highlighting an
• It was filed by the gentleman from the Cape and the Islands. It's a local...
• So we are trying to amend... ...is not reflected in a bill that has been filed.
• Several amendments have been filed, which will be considered at this time.

Keywords: 1212, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Because of the moving target, New Mexico made a strategic decision, and we filed a case in our state
• We are currently in several different litigations that we have filed.
• The manufacturers filed a motion to compel that case to arbitration.
• The manufacturers filed a motion to compel that to arbitration. We appealed that.
• Promptly after the state court finding against them, the Supreme Court, they chose to file in.

Committee: House Tobacco Settlement Revenue Oversight Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• It would clarify that a controlling person of a state bank is exempt from filing a new application to
• The person in charge of these requests joked with me and said, 'Well, she can file a complaint with the
• The committee substitute differs from the bill as filed in that it would recognize only a court order
• It would strike subsection E to avoid lawsuits filed against court orders. Thank you, Dean.
• The committee substitute differs from the bill as filed in that it would recognize only a court order

Bills: HB431 , HB1522 , HB1922 , HB2467 , HB2468 , HB3228 , HB3229 , HB3306 , HB3803 , HB3804 , HB3805 , HB3806 , HB4219 , HB4238 , HB4344 , HB4386 , HB4739

Committee: Senate Business & Commerce

Keywords: HB 431, Texas Property Code, Property Code Chapter 202, solar roof tiles, solar shingles, solar energy device, homeowners association, HOA, property owners' association, POA, renewable energy, residential solar, distributed solar, roof-mounted solar, homeowner rights, architectural control, open meetings, public notice, transparency, government efficiency

Summary: The committee first took up pending business and favorably reported several House bills without opposition, including HB 11, HB 132, HB 1041, HB 1606, HB 2286, and HB 5061. Each was moved out of committee with a recommendation that it do pass and be printed, and several were also recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then heard HB 3306, which would extend existing construction-contract indemnity exceptions to electric infrastructure construction, maintenance, and vegetation management work for electric utilities and transmission and distribution utilities. The sponsor said the bill would reduce litigation and insurance costs for ratepayers, while construction industry witnesses argued it would shift liability onto subcontractors and create broad-form indemnity in a way Texas law has generally prohibited since 2011. HB 3306 was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4739, a Comptroller-requested cleanup bill to repeal an outdated Finance Code provision requiring remittance of a portion of certain delinquency charges to the state, and HB 3803, HB 3804, and HB 3806, all Department of Banking-requested cleanup bills dealing with confidentiality and supervision rules for perpetual care funds, state banks, and trust companies. Those bills were briefly explained and left pending without testimony. HB 4219, aimed at improving Public Information Act compliance by requiring timely notice when records do not exist or are being withheld, allowing complaints to the Attorney General, and imposing training and fee consequences for noncompliance, drew support from a journalist and a policy analyst and was also left pending. The committee then heard HB 4238 on coerced debt and identity theft. The sponsor explained that the committee substitute narrows the bill to court-ordered findings of identity theft/coerced debt, gives collectors seven business days to stop collection activity, and removes a section to avoid litigation over court orders. A law professor and a family violence advocate testified in strong support, describing coerced debt as a barrier for domestic violence and elder abuse survivors trying to rebuild credit and access housing, jobs, and utilities. The bill was left pending. HB 1522, which would require local governments to post meeting notices three business days in advance and make budget materials more accessible online and in physical form, also drew support, though a school business officials representative raised concerns about the timing language, proposed-budget wording, and taxpayer impact statements for school districts; the bill was left pending after discussion. Later, the committee heard additional pending bills, including a PUC background-check bill that would expand the commission’s authority to check current employees and contractors and obtain FBI criminal history information, HB 3805 updating money services business regulation, HB 431 extending HOA solar-panel protections to solar tiles, and HB 3228 and HB 3229 on wind and solar recycling financial assurance and recycler solvency. HB 3228 received support from a Sierra Club witness who said recycling and disposal plans are needed for end-of-life renewable energy equipment, and HB 3229 was described as requiring recyclers to show financial resources at 125 percent through a letter of credit or bond. These bills were heard and left pending.

Transcript Highlights:

• And once that initial filing happens, and there is testimony that's getting filed, and there's rebuttal
• Test year letter would say, hey, we're going to file a rate case. That puts everybody on alert.
• And then about three months later, they then start to file basically their backup.
• They file basically their backup. This is why we're at, this is what we're asking.
• a question, and I think, if I'm not mistaken, I think President Gates may have had legislation or filed

Summary: The Committee on Ethics and Elections met with a quorum present and Senator Polsky excused. The committee first heard Senate Bill 1416 by Senator DeSigley, which would move municipal elections to coincide with the general election and extend incumbent terms until the new election schedule takes effect. Members asked about runoff elections, with the sponsor saying runoffs would likely shift to the August primary and that he was open to further discussion, including possibly eliminating runoffs. The bill drew support from a senator citing potential taxpayer savings, while the Florida League of Cities and Florida Association of Counties were noted as opposed. SB 1416 was reported favorably. The committee then considered Senate Bill 766 by Senator Burgess, as amended by a strike-all that refocused the bill on agents of “countries of concern” and narrowed disclosure requirements. The sponsor said the measure was intended to increase transparency around foreign-backed political activity and align with federal Foreign Agents Registration Act concepts. The amendment was adopted, and the bill as amended was reported favorably. Members next heard the reappointment of Mike LaRosa to the Public Service Commission. LaRosa described the PSC’s role regulating investor-owned utilities and emphasized transparency, consumer protection, workforce development, and adapting to new energy technologies such as small modular reactors. Senators questioned him closely about recent Florida Supreme Court criticism of PSC orders as insufficiently reasoned and overly reliant on utility assertions. LaRosa acknowledged the criticism, said PSC procedures and orders had become more detailed, and committed to continued improvement. Despite concerns, his nomination was advanced favorably to the full Senate. The committee then approved a block of nominations in tabs 4 through 27 without objection and without separate hearings. At the end of the meeting, Senator Grall asked to be recorded as voting in the affirmative on SB 1416 and SB 766, and the committee rose.

Transcript Highlights:

• I don't think there is any on file.
• I don't think there's any on file.
• It's just filing bankruptcy.
• The assistant called the roll on file item 11.
• Do we have a motion on file? Grove. AB 2163, do we have a motion on file? Grove.

Summary: The committee heard several energy-related bills. AB 710 would require investor-owned utilities to share critical circuit and grid information with local and tribal governments and community choice aggregators to help plan microgrids for resilience during PSPS events and wildfires. Supporters from counties and cities said better data sharing is needed to develop microgrids for critical facilities; PG&E and SDG&E opposed the bill as drafted, citing privacy and grid-security concerns, though SDG&E said amendments may address some issues. Members generally supported the bill’s goal, and the author accepted committee amendments. AB 2182 would restructure the CPUC’s industrial energy efficiency program so industrial customers’ funds are used for industrial projects, with less review and more focus on projects that reduce transmission and distribution needs. Support came from large energy users, with members praising the bill’s ratepayer protections and asking about caps, agriculture, and carbon capture; the author said agriculture could participate and carbon capture was removed from the bill. AB 2589 would require utility federal tax savings to be returned to ratepayers, building on prior legislation; it drew little debate and no opposition on the record. The committee also heard AB 2163, which would create strategic clean energy and critical mineral development zones, especially to support geothermal and lithium development in places like Imperial County and the Salton Sea. Supporters emphasized jobs, domestic supply chains, and state competitiveness, while some members raised questions about whether other zero-carbon resources should be included; the author said the bill could be receptive to those ideas. AB 2505 would allow hydrogen refueling stations to use dedicated utility meters and service lines, with supporters from the hydrogen industry and labor. AB 1577 would require data centers to report energy and water-use information to the Energy Commission and local planners; supporters said it would protect ratepayers and communities, while industry groups opposed the bill as too broad and duplicative, though they welcomed amendments narrowing the scope and adding trade-secret protections. AB 2065 would impose penalties on utilities that seek to recover prohibited or double-counted costs from ratepayers, and AB 2516 would create a California Grid Manufacturing Initiative to reduce equipment costs and expand in-state manufacturing; both drew strong support and some concerns about overreach and implementation. Finally, AB 2647 would direct the Energy Commission to study advanced nuclear’s role in meeting California’s electricity needs, with testimony in support from nuclear advocates and academics; the hearing ended before any final votes were taken, with several motions pending quorum.

Transcript Highlights:

• Provide both </font> <font color="aaaaaa">documentation filed with the </font> <font color="aaaaaa">SEC
• There is </font> <font color="aaaaaa">excellent late filed amendment </font> <font color="aaaaaa">>>
• There is </font> <font color="aaaaaa">excellent late filed amendment </font> <font color="aaaaaa">bar
• code 6, 8, 5, 6, 9, 4, Is </font> <font color="aaaaaa">excellent late filed amendment </font> <font
• </font> <font color="aaaaaa">There's a late filed Amendment </font> <font color="aaaaaa">bar code 7,

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Next on the list, we have Senate File 737.
• Senator Farnsworth moves Senate File 737 to be in front of the committee.
• Next on the list, we have Senate File 737.
• Senator Farnsworth moves Senate File 737 to be in front of the committee.
• Senator Farnsworth moves Senate File 737 to be in front of the committee.

Committee: Senate Transportation

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, this today to carry House File 852.
• For the for hearing house file 852.
• </c> Thank you so much for hearing House File Thank you so much for hearing House File 852.<00:18:01.360
• </c> House File House File 959,<00:40:34.720><c> which</c><00:40:34.960><c> would</c><00:40:35.200><c
• So, House File 366 crushed rock?

Bills: HF1569 , HF460 , HF850 , HF707 , HF798 , HF852 , HF366 , HF365 , HF836 , HF866 , HF885 , HF959 , HF1196 , HF1788 , HF1349 , HF2272 , HF2652 , HF1251 , HF607

Committee: House Capital Investment

Keywords: transportation, bond issuance, capital investment, infrastructure, road improvements, HF460, Sibley County, Highway 21, County State-Aid Highway, bonding bill, state bonds, bond proceeds fund, transportation grant, infrastructure improvements, sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, stormwater, public works, local infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:

• And then on your brackets, so was there a rhyme or reason to how you did the single, married filing jointly
• , and married filing separately as far as how you picked the numbers?
• Because if you look at the married filing separately, it's $4,050 on that bracket, you know, a change
• So that's where the married filing separately still stings. Right. Okay.
• That's where the married filing separately still stings. Right. Representative of Dr.

Committee: House Finance and Taxation

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The committee first reconsidered its action on Senate Bill 2093, then took up an amendment offered by Representative Hagert. The amendment would use $20 million for broad-based income tax relief by expanding the bottom income tax bracket, with the stated goal of providing relief beyond law enforcement-related spending. Members discussed how the Tax Department calculated the bracket changes, the continuing marriage penalty issue, and the broader goal of reducing income taxes over time. The amendment was adopted, and the committee then approved a due pass recommendation on the amended bill and re-referred it to Appropriations on a 12-1-1 vote. The committee then reconsidered Senate Bill 2323 so Representative Anderson could have his vote recorded. During discussion, Representative Dockter raised a possible amendment about moving a funding bucket, but after questions from members and the chair’s reminder that reconsideration was intended only to allow a recorded vote, Dockter withdrew the idea. Representative Foss noted information that the SIF fund had been reduced and said the bill’s impact on the prairie dog bucket would not change. The committee then voted to recommend due pass on amended Senate Bill 2323 and re-refer it to Appropriations; the motion carried on a roll call vote. The meeting ended with adjournment. No other formal actions were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• The amendment, the structure of the amendment mirrors the structure of the bill as filed.
• The amendment, the structure of the amendment mirrors the structure of the bill as filed.
• And to my knowledge the bill as filed.
• </c><01:49:55.360><c> And</c><01:49:55.640><c> so</c> um effort to to file this bill.
• And so um effort to to file this bill.

Committee: House Municipal and County Government

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:27:38.000><c> option</c> provides is a domestic filing option provides is a domestic filing option
• We tried to find a new way. that particularly for certain filings of that particularly for certain filings
• </c> Senate File 22 with no amendments. Senate File 22 with no amendments.
• </c> Senator, are you ready for Senate File Senator, are you ready for Senate File 20?
• </c><00:43:13.440><c> privacy</c> So, Senate File 20, data privacy So, Senate File 20, data privacy government

Bills: HB0075 , HB0128

Committee: House Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Keywords: virtual currency, kiosk, financial institutions, regulation, Wyoming Money Transmitters Act, penalties, severance tax, oil production, tax exemption, energy sector, economic impact, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Residents have the right to file. a state court.
• Residents have the right to file complaints without provider retaliation.
• Residents have the right to file complaints without provider retaliation.
• Nonprofit CCSEs are required to file the annual...
• Nonprofit CCSEs are required to file the annual PC report with the AG's Public Charities.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The commission’s fifth meeting focused on consumer protections and resident rights in continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), with a presentation by Yvonne Choyah of UC Law San Francisco. She described California’s CCRC framework, including entrance fee structures, monthly fee increases, contract types (A, B, and C), disclosure requirements, and regulatory oversight. A major theme was that residents often do not understand the contracts they sign, while providers retain broad discretion over fees, transfers, terminations, and changes to the physical plant. She also emphasized that California’s regulator is understaffed and not well suited to oversee the complex financial and insurance-like aspects of CCRCs, and that resident complaints and litigation can be slow and difficult. Choyah and commission members discussed several consumer-protection issues, including refundable versus repayable-on-resale entrance fees, rising monthly care fees, the decline of life care contracts, and the need for clearer disclosures and better comparative data for prospective residents. She noted that California requires annual disclosure statements, resident bill of rights materials, and some fee-related reporting, but that enforcement and accessibility remain weak. Members raised questions about resident board representation, accreditation, refund requirements, and whether state agencies or resident associations could help explain contracts to consumers before admission. Choyah suggested stronger oversight, more financial expertise in regulation, and better transparency about ownership and fee-setting. The meeting ended with discussion of the commission’s next steps toward its August report. Staff said a draft report would be prepared from the commission’s discussions and circulated for comment before final revisions. The chair also announced staff transitions: Jennifer would be leaving the State House role, and Juliana Fernandez and Vicky Halal would be the main contacts going forward. The commission adjourned after thanking Choyah for her presentation and answering member questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• Amendment number 87, filed by the Senator from Middlesex, Senator Lewis, the clerk will read.
• I rise in support of this amendment, filed by my METCO Caucus champion co-chair, Senator Jason Lewis,
• Senate Amendment Number 338, filed by the Senator from Essex. The clerk will read.
• Returning to amendment, Senator from Essex and Middlesex filed an amendment. The clerk.
• First, I want to thank my good friend from Everett for filing this amendment.

Keywords: 1212, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Next, Representative Franssen moves House File 4566 to be laid over for possible inclusion.
• Let's move on to House File 4566. Thank you again for this bill.
• House File 4566 is in response to the recent OLA report that came out March 17th.
• see that on your laptop, you can just click on that and refer to that, and also you might want to file
• Is there anyone else who wishes to testify on House File 4566?

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• It specifies that only an authorized third-party representative may file a civil action on the employee's
• And most of those, I believe 93% of those are already filed online.
• And most of those, I believe 93% of those are already filed online.
• A hearing may involve lengthy testimony and multi-page exhibit files.
• The judge may ask everyone at the hearing to turn to a certain page of the exhibit file.

Summary: The Labor and Workplace Standards Committee met on January 28, 2026, first hearing staff briefings and then taking executive action on House Bills 1571, 2144, 2191, and 2372. HB 1571 would make heart conditions a presumptive occupational disease for certain firefighters and law enforcement officers; members spoke in support of the bill as a response to the stresses and exposures of those jobs, and it was reported out 8-1 with a do-pass recommendation. HB 2144 would require notice to employees when employers use electronic monitoring for performance evaluations. The committee considered several amendments to a proposed substitute, adopting an amendment clarifying private communications protections but rejecting amendments to broaden emergency exceptions and remove the private right of action. The bill, as amended, passed 6-3. HB 2191 concerns wages in the construction industry and employer/contractor liability for unpaid wages. The committee considered a proposed substitute and several amendments. Members rejected amendments to include public entities as owners and to extend the right to cure to subcontractors, but adopted amendments removing Attorney General enforcement authority and making additional clarifying changes. Supporters emphasized accountability for unpaid wages and protecting vulnerable workers; opponents raised concerns about the scope of liability. The amended bill was reported out 6-3. HB 2372 would require workers’ compensation time loss benefits to include the full employer health care premium contribution rather than a partial percentage. An amendment to add L&I invoice and notice requirements and bar attorney fees on the health-care-premium portion was rejected, and the bill was then reported out 6-3. The committee also held public hearings on HB 2563 and HB 2188. HB 2563 would allow the Office of Administrative Hearings to automatically serve unemployment-case notices electronically during a pilot period ending July 30, 2029. OAH testified that the change would reduce mailing costs and improve service, while the Unemployment Law Project warned it would harm claimants with limited digital access and create procedural barriers; no action was taken during the hearing. HB 2188 would require L&I to publish actuarial indicated workers’ compensation rates and explain when rate caps shift costs to other classes. Business groups supported the transparency measure, and L&I testified it could provide the information and that the bill would have no fiscal impact; the hearing was closed without action.

Transcript Highlights:

• Mueller from Senate Fiscal, as it is a Senate file, if you're okay with that, Dan. Yes, I am.
• all included in Senator France's 14 were all included in Senator France's Senate<00:10:49.519><c> file
• </c> Senate file Senate file 2393<00:10:51.519><c> and</c><00:10:51.760><c> makes</c><00:10:52.240><c
• This article contains language from Senator Jean’s Senate File 999.
• Uh, this establishes a Senate File 999.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The difference between the committee substitute and the bill as filed is that it would provide additional
• Chair recognized Senator West on the committee substitute to the bill as filed. Thank you, Mr.
• The difference between the committee substitute and the bill as filed is that the committee substitute
• The difference between the committee substitute and the bill as filed is that the committee substitute
• Senate Bill 2608 will be left pending, subject to call of the chair, and one of the last bills filed

Bills: SB208 , SB628 , SB777 , SB1042 , SB2354 , SB2477 , SB2521 , SB2523 , SB2608 , SB2703 , SB2778 , SB2835 , SB2965 , SB2367 , SB3044

Committee: Senate Local Government

Keywords: workforce housing, capital investment fund, affordable housing, housing development, Texas housing laws, loan programs, community development, Texas housing, zero-interest loans, low-income housing, nonprofit organizations, construction, economic stability, housing affordability, capital investment, Texas housing policy, county fire code, fire marshal, local government code, interlocal agreement

Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met with a quorum at the start, adopted a two-minute limit for public testimony, and heard a series of housing, local government, fire code, and district-governance bills. Several measures were laid out with committee substitutes, including SB 628 on county fire code administration through interlocal agreements with emergency service districts; SB 208 creating a Workforce Housing Capital Investment Fund for zero-interest loans to nonprofit builders; SB 2835 allowing cities to opt into single-stair apartment buildings; and SB 2477 easing office-to-residential conversions in certain cities. Other bills addressed ESD spending thresholds (SB 2778), hospital district updates (SB 1042), subdivision/platting issues (SB 1708), public housing tax credit eligibility (SB 2608), groundwater district representation for Marfa and Presidio (SB 3044), park board authority in Waller County (SB 2367), ETJ removal procedures (SB 2523), and reporting death certificates to appraisal districts to help address squatting and homestead issues (SB 2521). Testimony was largely supportive on the housing bills. Supporters of SB 208, including Habitat for Humanity affiliates, a Brownsville nonprofit developer, Texans for Housing, and an educator, said the revolving fund would help nonprofit builders finance land, infrastructure, and development costs for affordable homes, especially for families earning 30% to 80% of area median income. SB 2835 drew support from architects, planners, and housing advocates who argued that single-stair buildings can be safe, more efficient, and better suited to missing-middle housing, though the Texas APA registered qualified opposition, saying the proposal bypasses the usual code-development process and may not be sufficiently studied. SB 2477 also received broad support from housing groups and policy organizations, who said office conversions could help address vacancy and housing shortages, though Corpus Christi raised a concern about fee recovery and local cost reimbursement. The committee also heard support for SB 628 from a county fire marshal and an ESD representative, who said the bill would reduce duplicate fire-code enforcement and costs. SB 2778 was backed by a Bexar County ESD fire chief, who said the current $2,000 expenditure approval threshold is outdated and slows emergency purchases and repairs. SB 2608 was supported by the El Paso housing authority, which said adding certain Section 8 projects to the at-risk LIHTC set-aside would help renovate aging subsidized housing. SB 3044 was presented as a way to give Marfa and Presidio representation on the groundwater district board while preserving permitting authority. Each bill heard public testimony was left pending subject to the call of the chair, and the committee recessed to reconvene after the Senate adjourns.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, next we have a bill, House File 601, remarks before we go on to uh the vote. remarks before we go
• </c><00:10:53.120><c> 601,</c> Uh, next we have a bill, House File 601.
• So I will move House File 601 before the committee and move that it be placed on the general register
• Um, so House File 601 is an appropriation for fiscal year 25, addressing the issue right now that the
• Seeing none, I renew my motion that House File 601 be placed on the general register.

Bills: HF601

Committee: House Ways and Means

Keywords: agriculture, depredation compensation, livestock, crop damage, elk, wolves, wildlife management, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair, that is my intention to move House File 2027 and ask it to be before the committee and to
• </c><00:01:01.920><c> to</c><00:01:02.079><c> move</c><00:01:02.239><c> House</c><00:01:02.480><c> File
• </c> that is my intention to move House File that is my intention to move House File 2027<00:01:04.000
• But members, we have a bill, House File 901.
• But members, we have a bill, House File 901.

Keywords: 1183, house