Video & Transcript Research : 'meat processing training'

Page 40 of 500
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sorry, I was muted. current uh slow fragmented process is current uh slow fragmented process is really
  • Um, in terms of Kahana Bay process.
  • a process basically. a process basically.
  • <00:51:40.640> Our Erosion is a natural process. Our Erosion is a natural process.
  • So we have a shoreline processes.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1846, relating to shoreline mitigation districts. DLNR and the Office of Planning opposed the bill, arguing it would improperly shift regulatory roles between the agencies and prioritize private land interests over public trust and natural and historic resources. Supporters, including the Shoreline Preservation Coalition, Kahana Bay residents, and Hawaii Realtors, said regional planning is needed to address severe erosion, especially in Kahana, and that better coordination between state and county agencies could help move stalled projects forward. Testifiers emphasized that shoreline conditions vary by area and that science-based, region-specific solutions are needed. Members asked questions about whether existing law already allows regional planning and emergency shoreline responses. DLNR said it already has authority to process regional projects and cited an existing draft EIS for Kahana Bay that would proceed through normal permitting and public hearing channels. Supporters responded that the bill would provide a clearer regional planning framework and help communities facing urgent erosion impacts. No vote was taken on HB 1846 in the portion provided. The committee then took up HB 2205, relating to emergency erosion mitigation. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it already has authority to issue emergency permits and had recently done so quickly for a collapsed sidewalk at Queen Surf Beach, and warning that the bill’s language could weaken Act 16 by changing a prohibition on shoreline hardening to a requirement to merely minimize it. Kahana Bay representatives and other supporters argued the bill would create a limited, regulated short-term pathway for emergency shoreline solutions while long-term plans are developed, and said current permits have expired or stalled, leaving dangerous sandbags and no practical relief. Additional testimony from a private homeowner stressed that erosion is threatening homes and that private owners are often bearing the cost of protecting public shoreline access. The discussion remained focused on balancing emergency protection, public access, and long-term shoreline management, and no final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 14th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • Doing so would reduce duplication in educational training and streamline the process, allowing individuals
  • But do you learn diagnostic techniques or training? Are you trained in diagnostics?
  • What I'm trained to do, right?
  • In the medical training model, it's a much more robust preparation and training.
  • Once selected, the three-year education and training process continues with rigorous didactic education
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 14th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm a family medicine physician by training.
  • We deserve well-trained physicians too.
  • And until there are thousands and thousands of hours of practice and training... training under you,
  • ...been trained to perform services?
  • A trained crisis counselor answers the phone.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • get to the meat of meat of our meeting. get to the meat of meat of our meeting.
  • It just, we just don't take action. process of of this. Well that's said and process of of this.
  • Your process is going to move forward. Your process is going to move forward.
  • <01:44:30.960> I who can do homelessness training. I who can do homelessness training.
  • training training homeless homelessness training training for<01:44:42.320> people<01:44:42.800
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The Government Contract Committee met with a quorum, observed a moment of silence for Representative McCool after the death of his sister, and approved the April 14 minutes. The committee then reviewed a large agenda of contracts and amendments, beginning with a deferred Office of the Controller procurement involving broker services. Members questioned why a contract that had previously been handled for about $300,000 annually was now priced at about $1 million, and why the procurement was limited to one year. Office of the Controller staff said the prior vendor had held the work for more than 20 years, the work had previously been treated as not practical to bid, and the new RFP was intended to increase competition. They said the technical evaluation was scored before cost was considered, that past performance was not scored because it was seen as unreliable, and that AON received the highest technical score despite not being the lowest bidder. After discussion, the committee voted to take no action and let the contract proceed to the Finance Cabinet, with members noting continuing concerns about the pricing and process. The committee next considered a DCBS memorandum of agreement amendment for language services. DCBS representatives said the additional funding did not come from a new cut elsewhere, but from reduced spending on interpreter services because commonly used forms had been translated into other languages, freeing up funds for the contract. The committee approved the item unanimously. The final major item discussed was an initial contract for the Board of Hairdressers and Cosmetologists for legal services. Board staff said the board had been without a permanent general counsel since March 2024 and had relied on special and conflict counsel because of unusually heavy litigation, including 11 active cases, plus broader disciplinary and licensing changes tied to recent legislation and an oversight report. They said the contract was a not-to-exceed amount funded entirely by agency fees and that the board was currently running a surplus. Senator Thomas urged support, citing prior legislation and oversight findings about problems at the board and saying the contract was needed to help the board address ongoing litigation and corrective work. The committee approved the contract and then approved the remaining agenda items without objection, sending them forward.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce, Consumer Protection and International Affairs May 13th, 2026

Commerce, Consumer Protection, and International Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're developing the pellet process right now.
  • We have the process, but we're in the process of looking at sites, and yes, we want to build two to three
  • Maybe help with training.
  • I mean, we are going to use a chemical process in ours to “Used.
  • There is a dispute process. It's a dispute process that goes between the Motor Vehicle Commission.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Apr 27th, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • We currently have a training that's in place for teachers to offer the training for the, I'm sorry, for
  • Foster parents go through an extensive process; it’s like a nine-month process.
  • They will see the training, and those that are more equipped to do the training would then have that
  • Hall mentioned, ethics training, and certain trainings related to sexual harassment.
  • This is sort of an ongoing process.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education 3RD REVISED Feb 24th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Level because this would be state-coordinated training.
  • what potentially this training looks like.
  • I think that we talked a lot today about training.
  • And there is some training, but I think more importantly, if this new principals training academy, or
  • to train, we have to improve.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • This sets up the process to manage outpatient treatment for individuals that are in the Criminal Justice
  • This sets up the process for community-based outpatient restoration treatment. Yield for questions.
  • What this bill does is allow for the use of electronic arrest warrants, and by mirroring the process
  • What we’re doing here is we’re trying to clean up the court fines and fees collection process, make it
  • In these program houses, there is accountability, training, and support for a successful transition.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • But I have relied on legal counsel throughout this process.
  • I was just curious, when did you begin this process?
  • A process upon which to base maps. Okay.
  • Yes, about the process.
  • This whole process is a sham.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I haven't inquired as to the process and who all was involved in that.
  • Nothing to do with HB4, nothing to do with our redistricting process.
  • I knew that he was involved in the redistricting process and I called him.
  • There is nothing that is not transparent in this process.
  • Non-confusing process, like with hundreds of bills in our regular session.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, this process in this... map, no matter what has been said.
  • To the election process.
  • The process typically takes a couple of years.
  • process.
  • The process from population, and instead it ties it to political expedience.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Also, there are concerns about the enforcement process.
  • Trainings be listed on the agency's website.
  • So, y'all already have training programs?
  • So that is another huge reason for this training. Ms.
  • The sunset process, but we're really grateful for this huge step forward.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill is again a result of a similar process.
  • Additionally, the lack of required training contributes to a general mistrust in the notarization process
  • . training and exam during working hours. 2.
  • process.
  • To bring a case earlier on in the process.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • If you will, a process.
  • During the Sunset process... process, they identified individuals who had been voted for parole but had
  • You're properly trained, you properly use it.
  • Their training or inside of their training.
  • Then there's a Field Training Officer (FTO) process after that, where you'll run about 30 exams.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Who's going to train them on the nuanced requirements particular to each visa category?
  • Federal immigration judges receive training to determine if a person has violated the terms of their
  • So we had to develop training for officers over this.
  • I have been threatened by poorly trained law enforcement officers more times than I can recall.
  • Additionally, we conduct training and education programs for officers to help them track metal theft.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice (Part II) Apr 8th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Who's going to train them on the nuanced requirements particular to each visa category?
  • Federal immigration judges receive training to determine if a person has violated the terms of their
  • We developed training for officers over this.
  • I have been threatened by poorly trained LEOs more times than I can recall.
  • We conduct training and education programs for officers to help them track metal theft.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice heard testimony on several bills dealing with criminal discovery, crime lab access, controlled substances, community supervision, interference with officers, oilfield theft, and copper theft. On SB 1124, witnesses split over whether the bill clarified discovery law after the Heath decision or rolled back the Michael Morton Act; opponents argued it narrowed disclosure and shifted responsibility away from prosecutors, while supporters said it restored balance, limited harsh sanctions, and preserved exculpatory-disclosure duties. The committee later voted 4-0 to report SB 1124 favorably and place it on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also heard and later reported favorably SB 1372, which resolves a statutory conflict over access to the DPS crime lab portal, and SB 1936, which changes how LSD “abuse units” are defined for testing and charging purposes; both were sent to the local and uncontested calendar. SB 1937, which would require a subject-matter expert from the testing lab to participate in pretrial meetings in capital cases involving biological evidence, was also reported favorably and placed on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then heard SB 552, which would make people defined in the bill as “illegal aliens” ineligible for judge-ordered or jury-recommended community supervision, including deferred adjudication. Supporters said the bill would prevent state-funded early release of people who entered or remained in the country unlawfully, while county officials and immigration advocates warned it would be overbroad, difficult to administer, and costly to local jails and taxpayers. Despite those concerns, the committee voted to report SB 552 favorably, and Senator Huffman requested it be taken to the floor. On SB 1208, which increases interference with a peace officer or public official from a Class B misdemeanor to a state jail felony, law enforcement witnesses said repeat “auditors” and similar actors were creating dangerous confrontations and needed stronger deterrence; opponents argued the bill would chill protected filming and protest activity. The committee voted to report SB 1208 favorably and place it on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also took testimony on SB 1806, a committee substitute addressing oilfield theft and related crimes. Supporters from law enforcement and the oil and gas industry said organized theft of crude, equipment, and related materials is a growing problem and that the bill would strengthen penalties, allow seizure and sale of stolen product, and improve inspection and forensic tools. The committee substitute was adopted and the bill was reported favorably, with placement on the local and uncontested calendar. Finally, the committee heard SB 1646, which targets copper theft and fiber vandalism by increasing penalties, requiring reporting and recordkeeping for certain purchases, and adding training and enforcement tools. Telecommunications, law enforcement, and emergency-network witnesses supported the bill as necessary to protect 9-1-1 and critical infrastructure, while metal recyclers warned the bill could overregulate legitimate businesses and sweep too broadly. The committee later voted to report the committee substitute for SB 1646 favorably as well.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice (Part I) Apr 8th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • , with the person's training.
  • , with the person's training.
  • They followed their training.
  • My position is even if they acted outside of their training or inside of their training, in the case
  • It keeps our examiners sharp because they're heavily involved in that training process for other polygraph
Summary: The committee heard a series of criminal justice bills, beginning with SB 1870 and SB 1727, both of which were adopted as committee substitutes and reported favorably to the full Senate. SB 1870 would bar local governments from adopting policies that decriminalize controlled substances or direct officials not to enforce state drug laws, with civil penalties enforced by the Attorney General for violations. SB 1727 was described as a technical change to make the draft a formal Legislative Council version of a TDCJ-related assault bill; both bills were also sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then took up SB 2405, the major Sunset bill for TDCJ, the Board of Pardons and Paroles, Windham School District, and the Correctional Managed Health Care Committee. Senator Parker explained that the bill continues and modernizes those agencies, requires a 10-year facilities and staffing plan, expands rehabilitation and reentry programming, improves parole-board consistency and training, and codifies various cleanup and inspector general recommendations. Sunset staff and agency witnesses discussed the bill’s data-sharing, program coordination, and projected savings from reducing delays in parole-voted programming; public witnesses generally supported the post-secondary education and reentry provisions, while some urged stronger statutory direction for Windham and more reform to medically recommended intensive supervision. The bill was left pending. SB 1804, SB 1099, SB 2569, and SB 2570 were also heard. SB 1804 would allow restitution for tattoo removal for human trafficking survivors and remove the age restriction so adult survivors can qualify; it was reported favorably and sent to the local calendar. SB 1099 would increase penalties for certain felony offenses when committed by a person determined to be unlawfully present in the country; immigration and civil rights witnesses opposed it as overbroad and difficult to administer, but it was reported favorably. SB 2569 would modernize unmanned aircraft reporting by requiring law enforcement agencies to post reports on public websites; it passed unanimously and was sent to the local calendar. SB 2570 would create a defense to prosecution for peace officers and correctional guards using less-lethal force weapons within the scope of their training; law enforcement witnesses supported it, civil rights and prosecutor witnesses raised concerns that it was too broad and could weaken existing use-of-force standards, and the bill was left pending for further work.