Transcript Highlights:

• The only thing that might be considered an actuarial analysis, but at this time there is not, and I honestly
• You should have your packet and actuarial analysis that just came out this morning, and I will read one
• short paragraph from the actuarial analysis.
• that just came out this actal Analysis that just came out this morning<00:10:03.279> and<00:10
• <00:10:07.399> uh paragraph from the actal analysis uh paragraph from the actal analysis uh

Keywords: Consideration of HB 73 02:23 Consideration of HB 441 07:24 Consideration of HB 462 18:44, 958, all

Summary: The House State Government Committee met with a quorum and considered three bills. House Bill 73, as amended by committee substitute, added We Lead CS to the list of agencies participating in the Teachers’ Retirement System administrative provisions. The sponsor explained the bill corrects an oversight involving a computer science education service provider established in 2022. A question about fiscal impact was answered with no expected fiscal note or actuarial impact. The committee adopted the substitute and passed HB 73 19-0 with favorable expression. House Bill 441 addressed teacher shortages by expanding the number of retired teachers and critical-shortage-area teachers school districts may hire. The sponsor said districts could hire retired teachers up to 10% of staff and critical shortage area teachers up to 10%, replacing lower current limits and a temporary COVID-era provision that had expired. Members asked about work limits, salary rules, and how often shortage areas are identified; the sponsor said retired teachers remain subject to existing earnings limits, critical shortage teachers are paid at least a rank-two, 10-year salary, and shortage areas are identified annually by the Commissioner of Education. Supportive comments noted the bill was a stopgap and that long-term solutions should include recruitment, retention, and pay. The committee passed HB 441 19-0 with favorable expression. House Bill 462 would allow county clerks to correct marriage applications or licenses by affidavit, without requiring a lawsuit in circuit court, when there are obvious errors or omissions. The Kenton County clerk and another clerk testified that the change would help people who need corrected records for Social Security, Real ID, inheritance, and other legal purposes, while still preserving data needed by Vital Statistics. Members described the bill as a practical efficiency measure. The committee passed HB 462 19-0 with favorable expression, and the meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• One is the economic analysis that was relied upon by the department to determine that a statement of
• Before I get into the economic analysis, I'd like to provide you with some background information.
• We had to do the exact same analysis as part of the CFWI legislation.
• We had to do the exact same analysis as part of the CFI, CFWI legislation.
• It also hinges upon going through and providing sort of an analysis of pre-imposed conditions.

Summary: The Joint Administrative Procedures Committee met on February 3, 2025, with a quorum present and took up three main items. First, the committee considered a large set of recommended objections to Agency for Health Care Administration rules, all centered on sunset provisions stating the rules would expire after five years. AHCA asked for another deferral while it reviewed the rules, arguing the sunset language was a form of self-restraint rather than an invalid exercise of rulemaking authority. Committee leadership disagreed that further delay would resolve the issue and moved to a single vote covering all objections. The motion passed by roll call, and the committee informed AHCA that an objection would be filed unless the agency amended the rules within 30 days. The committee then heard an informational briefing from the Department of Environmental Protection on its Outstanding Florida Springs rule and stormwater rule. DEP explained that it did not prepare a statement of estimated regulatory cost for the springs rule because the proposed standards largely mirror existing water management district rules and the Central Florida Water Initiative framework, so DEP said there was no new regulatory burden. Members asked about permit authority, costs, and whether the rules were functionally different from prior rules. DEP maintained the rules set minimum standards and did not add costs beyond what regulated parties were already doing. DEP also described implementation of the stormwater rule adopted under the 2020 Clean Waterways Act and later ratified by the Legislature in 2024. DEP said the rule was the product of years of workshops and technical advisory committee meetings, and that the final version included lower-cost alternatives, grandfathering, and phased implementation. DEP estimated the rule’s cost at about $2,600 per acre in the revised CERC, while industry witnesses said the real cost could be much higher, especially if land costs are included. A home builders representative argued the estimate understated impacts, while a stormwater engineer said the rule gives more flexible, performance-based tools and could become more cost-effective over time. Finally, Senator Graal presented proposed Chapter 120 changes in SB 108, aimed at tightening and modernizing rulemaking. The proposal would require five-year rule reviews, annual agency reporting, faster notice of proposed rulemaking after authorizing legislation, electronic filing, public access to incorporated materials, clearer tracking of technical changes, and limits on how long rules can remain pending ratification. Members discussed whether the Legislature should be more specific in statutes about rulemaking deadlines and whether agencies should be more accountable when rules stall. No formal action was taken on the Chapter 120 proposals, and the committee adjourned after discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• Number 20 is DHS with UAMS for financial reporting and analysis for Medicaid programs.
• Number 20, DHS with UAMS for financial reporting and analysis for Medicaid programs, Number 20, DHS with
• UAMS, is for financial reporting and analysis for Medicaid programs, waivers, and grants.
• This is a sustainability benchmarking analysis project.
• validation for the Arkansas State Crime Lab's forensic toxicology section, including qualitative analysis

Summary: The committee met to review a supplemental agenda item, procurement rule revisions, methods of finance, discretionary grants, contracts, reports, and a member disclosure. The supplemental agenda was accepted, and the Office of State Procurement’s rule revisions were approved after Jessica Patterson explained they were driven by 2025 legislative changes, including Act 782, CASO Consulting recommendations, and updates to sole source, bid, protest, and debarment provisions. The methods of finance and discretionary grants were also approved, covering a range of university capital projects, health and human services grants, historic preservation awards, and tobacco prevention and cessation programs. The committee then reviewed RFQs and six ratifications. The ratifications included a Workforce Connections payment to ACT WorkKeys for services provided during a contract gap, a Department of Health ratification for water-leak repairs, a large Department of Public Safety ratification for Motorola’s Arkansas Wireless Information Network upgrade, a Veterans Affairs HVAC ratification, an ADFA medical services ratification, and a UA Little Rock painting contract ratification. Members questioned the Public Safety ratification at length about why the expired Motorola contract was not caught sooner and why it took months after discovery to come forward; agency officials said the work was tied to bond funding and was not tracked in ASIS, and the chair urged agencies to develop better monitoring procedures. The committee approved a large slate of construction, intergovernmental, out-of-state, and in-state contracts, including many recurring service agreements for DHS, higher education institutions, corrections, health agencies, and state support functions. Several members asked about specific contracts, including aerial application services for correctional farms and a Southern Arkansas University custodial contract, and staff or agency representatives provided brief explanations. The meeting concluded with review of reports and approval of a member disclosure involving Representative Andrew Collins’ investment interest in a company leasing property to Arkansas Rehabilitation Services.

Transcript Highlights:

• Number 20, DHS with UAMS for financial reporting and analysis for Medicaid programs, waivers, and grants
• number 12 Arkansas Center for Health Improvement to continue performing data analysis.
• Number 20, DHS with UAMS for financial reporting and analysis for Medicaid programs, waivers, and grants
• This is for lab services, including qualitative and quantitative analysis of major drugs of abuse and
• This is a sustainability benchmarking analysis project. 74, UAFS with OHO Corporation.

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We perform the same analysis. Could you please introduce yourself? All right.
• So, we perform the same analysis. Same studies, virtually identical.
• So, we do have a similar analysis on here.
• That was the analysis as of last year.
• I was trying to do a quick analysis on my own with regards to the target number that you're using for

Transcript Highlights:

• Our analysis of Ecology's data showed that the vast majority of cleanup sites are managed by independent
• Our data analysis found that of third-party-managed sites, 212 were ranked by Ecology as high-risk or
• Our data analysis found that of third-party-managed sites, 212 were ranked by Ecology as high-risk or
• As a note, in our analysis, we did not evaluate which of these high- and moderate-high-risk sites are
• As a note, in our analysis, we did not evaluate which of these high- and moderate-high-risk sites are

Summary: The I-900 Subcommittee held a public hearing on the State Auditor’s performance audit, Community Engagement During Contaminated Site Cleanups. Auditors said Ecology directly conducts or supervises cleanup at only about 8% of active contaminated sites, while most sites are handled by third parties or have no cleanup plan yet. The audit found that Ecology generally met legal requirements at the sites it oversees, but community engagement varied, was not consistently tailored to local needs, and lacked a systematic “lessons learned” process. Auditors also found inconsistent coordination between Ecology and the Department of Health, and limited guidance for staff on when to collaborate. Tribal feedback was mixed: some tribes said engagement met their needs, while others wanted earlier and more tailored outreach. Committee members pressed the auditors on why many third-party-managed sites appeared to have little or no public involvement, and whether Ecology has broader authority to require public engagement and oversight. The auditors responded that their review focused on community engagement requirements, not the full cleanup permitting process, and said the gap they identified was the lack of required oversight for third-party engagement. Members also asked about tribal engagement, exposure scenarios, and the meaning of “active” and “planless” sites. Ecology officials said they agreed with many of the findings, were already taking steps to improve community research, lessons-learned reviews, tribal guidance, and coordination with Health, and had recently launched a public email notification system for site status changes. They also said some recommendations would require additional funding or staff resources. Public testimony supported stronger community engagement and more resources for Ecology. Washington Conservation Action said contaminated sites disproportionately affect communities of color and low-income communities, praised the audit for highlighting the need for better site-specific engagement, and urged full funding for MTCA-related work. The hearing ended with the chair inviting written comments and adjourning the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• algorithm that could look at applicants for a job and just by doing a sort of background internet analysis
• algorithm that could look at applicants for a job and just by doing a sort of background internet analysis
• algorithm that could look at applicants for a job and just by doing a sort of background internet analysis
• those<00:08:56.959> applicants<00:08:57.760> they<00:08:57.880> can analysis
• of those applicants they can analysis of those applicants they can predict<00:08:58.880> which

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm reading the bill analysis on page... Thank you, President Gates.
• I'm reading the bill analysis on page three, and it says the bill specifies that all subsidiaries must
• So could you explain, is the bill analysis correct, I guess is the question?
• I'm reading the bill analysis on page, Thank you, President Gates.
• So could you explain, is the bill analysis correct, I guess is the question?

Summary: The Committee on Education Postsecondary heard a presentation on Florida’s maritime and ocean economy from Florida Atlantic University, the College of the Florida Keys, and Star Center. Speakers emphasized the importance of maritime industries such as aquaculture, marine engineering, shipbuilding, transportation, coastal resilience, and offshore renewable energy, and described workforce programs, certifications, and partnerships designed to train students and workers for these fields. They also highlighted federal and state initiatives supporting ocean economy research and commercialization, including tech hubs and innovation programs. The committee then considered SB 312 relating to the Florida Institute of Human and Machine Cognition. Senator Gates explained that the bill would allow IHMC to create a subsidiary to commercialize research, similar to Moffitt Cancer Center. Senator Fine offered and the committee adopted a friendly amendment addressing board membership concerns tied to a University of West Florida trustee. However, after questions arose about whether the bill and analysis aligned on whether subsidiaries would be for-profit or not-for-profit, the bill was tabled. Finally, the committee took up SB 270 on the Bright Futures Scholarship Program. The bill would extend eligibility for students in certain military/public-service family situations, giving families more time to establish Florida residency after returning to the state. Senator Fine’s amendment was adopted to add AP Capstone Diploma students to the automatic Bright Futures eligibility provisions, alongside IB and Cambridge AICE students. The committee then reported the bill favorably as amended by a vote of 7-0, and adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• legislative offices: the Office of the Auditor General and OPPAGA, the Office of Program Policy Analysis
• And then methodology has the capability of doing some pretty sophisticated data analysis work for us.
• We also conduct policy analysis either before or after a policy is implemented, and we're looking to
• I noticed OPAGA mentioned about the use of data analysis. We use that more than ever.
• That information includes the management's discussion and analysis, the budgetary comparison schedule

Summary: The Joint Legislative Auditing Committee met to receive annual overviews of its oversight responsibilities and the work of the Auditor General and OPAGA. Committee staff reviewed the committee’s authority over state and local governments, enforcement of audit-report filing requirements, repeated audit findings, Transparency Florida reporting, and lobbying compensation audits. Auditor General Cheryl Norman described her office’s independence, audit standards, quality control, and major audit areas, including the state’s annual financial and single audits, school district and university audits, operational and performance audits, and attestation work. She also noted staffing shortages, recruitment efforts, and a request for carry-forward funds to study salaries. Members asked about whether audits can quantify recoverable dollars, how school district spending comparisons are handled, and how to raise concerns about DCF-related audits or a local city audit that has been pending for years. Norman said her office can quantify findings when possible, sometimes compares costs across districts in operational audits, and that members can bring specific concerns to the appropriate deputy auditor general or the committee. She also explained that citizen or local-government audit requests may require payment of audit costs. OPAGA Coordinator Kara Collins-Gomez outlined OPAGA’s role as a legislative research unit that conducts studies directed by law, the presiding officers, or the committee, and described its policy areas, methodologies, contract monitoring, and recurring statutory reports. Deputy Auditor General Matthew Tracy explained how to read operational audit reports, including findings, criteria, condition, cause, effect, recommendations, and management responses. Deputy Auditor General Greg Senators explained financial audit reports, including audit opinions, required supplementary information, internal control and compliance findings, federal program compliance, and management letters. The meeting concluded with thanks to the presenters and a motion to adjourn, which passed without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• So routes in that analysis are compared by route type.
• So uh this is using the analysis.
• ><00:04:31.680> by<00:04:31.919> route that analysis are compared by route that analysis
• 25:26.880> these<00:25:27.120> numbers good analysis of what these numbers good analysis
• <00:34:35.040> uh therefore were part of the analysis uh therefore were part of the analysis

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee heard a Met Council report from Charles Carlson on high-subsidy transit route analysis required by the transportation bill. Carlson explained that the study uses per-passenger operating subsidy, compares routes by type and service day, and is intended to help providers improve cost-effectiveness while recognizing transit’s importance for access, affordability, safety, and the region’s economy. He noted that routes more than 60% above peer averages are considered the highest-subsidy tier, and that the report also estimates the cost of Metro Mobility associated with those routes. Members asked several questions about why contracted service can cost less than directly operated service, whether contracting affects wages, union membership, or service quality, and why the Met Council targets about 20% of regular route service for contracting. Carlson said contracted service can be cheaper because of lower overhead and other market factors, that the council sets minimum wage and service-quality requirements in contracts, and that customers should not notice a quality difference. He also said the 20% target is meant to balance cost-effective service, geography, and a mix of providers, and that some routes may become more cost-effective with more frequent service depending on local demand. Carlson reported that in 2024, 206 of 264 routes met guidelines, 16 were in the lowest intervention tier, 14 in the middle tier, and 28 were in the highest-subsidy tier. He said the regional share of high-subsidy service was about 4.1%, but the share varied widely by provider, with some at 0% and others much higher. He estimated that discontinuing the highest-subsidy routes would save about $23 million annually and up to $72 million in capital costs. For Metro Mobility, he said the cost associated with trips tied to high-subsidy routes rose from about $368,000 in 2023 to about $6.1 million in 2024, largely because the mix of routes triggering federally mandated paratransit service changed, especially in the Shakopee area.

Transcript Highlights:

• asked them to do a thorough analysis asked them to do a thorough analysis uh<00:29:21.279> of
• So there was some analysis behind it. It wasn't like we just plucked the number out of thin air.
• So, there was some analysis behind Okay.
• analysis on how they arrived at that. analysis on how they arrived at that.
• <00:40:36.480> Another the analysis is complete. Another the analysis is complete.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are also accepting amendments C and D in the analysis to limit the size of units to a net average
• We've done analysis by MapCraft, the consulting firm. They've looked at sites across the state.
• Yeah, on page 14 of the analysis under number 10 summarizes six amendments that we had proposed to the
• Quintana, there was a technical amendment, comment five of the analysis.
• I also want to commend and thank the Senate analysis as well.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But the latest budget analysis and where we are, and maybe where finance is and where money is and all
• This budget is a product of a lot of research and analysis and collaboration with PED, with LESC, and
• I think that your analysis is actually, analysis is actually... that we adapt this?
• I think that your analysis is actually, analysis is actually I think that your analysis is actually a
• Chairman, we do have it in the analysis.

Summary: The committee first heard a detailed staff presentation on the LESC FY27 public school support recommendation. Staff reviewed the budget structure and explained that, despite a downward revision in state revenue estimates, the recommendation still relied on recurring and non-recurring revenue to support educator compensation, insurance, transportation, literacy, math, special education, and other school programs. Major recurring items included a 3% compensation increase, funding for an 80-20 health insurance cost share, insurance premium growth, and transportation adequacy funding. Staff also flagged a possible supplemental need of up to $35 million for virtual education tied to rapid enrollment growth in Chama and Santa Rosa, and members raised concerns about the quality, accountability, and funding model for virtual programs. Members asked questions about transportation for rural districts, the Martinez-Yazzie lawsuit fees, the treatment of enrollment declines in the school funding formula, and whether the word “average” in salary language should remain in the budget. Staff explained that the SEG should remain whole, that the insurance and transportation recommendations applied to all public school employees but not contractors, and that the budget included multiple math-related investments spread across several lines rather than one single appropriation. There was also discussion of out-of-school learning grants, school meals, literacy center operations, special education training, and the Public Education Reform Fund, including the use of multi-year, evaluation-based appropriations for high-impact tutoring and community schools. After discussion, the committee adopted the LESC budget recommendation. The committee then moved to endorsed legislation proposals. It endorsed a bill allowing the secretary to suspend an individual school board member, with notice and appeal procedures clarified, and a bill creating an 80-20 health insurance cost-share requirement for public school employees, along with a study of the sustainability of public school insurance programs. It also endorsed a bill on attendance provisions for students with severe medical conditions, which would keep those students from being classified as excessively absent. Finally, the committee discussed a teacher residency bill that would raise stipend levels, allow residents to complete service anywhere in New Mexico, and remove the requirement that sponsoring schools must hire them, though the bill did not include an appropriation. Members also raised questions about bilingual, Hispanic, and Black education funding, cultural and linguistic supports in teacher preparation, and where various programs should be placed in the budget or PERF framework.

Transcript Highlights:

• It was in the DPS analysis that they would have to have additional investments.
• I believe you talked about the OSI's analysis of it not raising premiums.
• It's weird because I don't see that on the OSI analysis. It's like a blank document.
• Speaker, gentle lady, and I understand that, but I don't see that in the FIR or in any analysis.
• Speaker, gentleman, I don't know why the OSI analysis was blank. They have a ton of information.

Transcript Highlights:

• for your analysis? for your analysis?
• involved in their analysis. involved in their analysis.
• , or we could do a sua sponte analysis, or we could do a sua sponte analysis, but<00:36:59.760>
• I want to know whether or not they did any kind of analysis.
• substitute for Hawaii-specific analysis substitute for Hawaii-specific analysis and<01:23:33.600

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Finally, we respectfully request dedicated state implementation funding and a formal fiscal analysis
• Your committee's own analysis recognizes this bill as a reimbursable state-mandated local program and
• Your comments for fiscal analysis and recognizes that SB 675 creates a reimbursable state mandate and
• The analysis also recognizes that if these mandates are determined to be reimbursable, those costs could
• We respectfully request a comprehensive fiscal analysis, dedicated state implementation funding, and

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Finally, we respectfully request dedicated state implementation funding and a formal fiscal analysis
• Your committee's own analysis recognizes this bill as a reimbursable state-mandated local program and
• The analysis also recognizes that these costs could ultimately become part of the state General Fund.
• We respectfully request a comprehensive fiscal analysis, dedicated state implementation funding, and
• We respectfully request a comprehensive fiscal analysis, dedicated state implementation, funding, and

Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee met on July 1, 2026, and first heard SB 1055 by Senator Laird, which would authorize additional construction procurement methods for the Pajaro River levee/flood control project to speed delivery, improve quality control, and reduce costs after prior flooding and evacuations. The Nature Conservancy testified in support, and there was no opposition or committee questioning. The bill was later moved out of committee, with Republicans not voting and Assemblymembers Dixon and Tangipa voting no. The committee also heard SB 1000 by Senator Becker, a follow-up to California’s AI Transparency Act. The bill would update content provenance and disclosure rules for AI-generated and non-synthetic content, remove a user threshold for covered systems, add privacy protections, and create guardrails for third-party licenses, with the goal of aligning California’s rules with international standards. Adobe and Google supported the measure, and it was sent out on a roll call with Mr. Ta not voting. SB 1229, presented on behalf of Senator Allen, would limit an existing Coastal Act disaster-rebuild exemption to prevent speculative development from using the exemption to reduce public access to the coast. The Nature Conservancy supported the bill, there was no opposition, and it was moved out of committee. The committee also approved several bills on the consent and suspense calendars, and public comment included Imperial County concerns about SB 675, including board representation, implementation timing, county administrative control, and funding for mandated changes.

Transcript Highlights:

• One follow-up, and I see in the bill analysis one of the exceptions where this information is not exempt
• would be, in the last bullet point from the bill analysis, in the case of personal, financial, and health
• I see in the bill analysis, one of the exceptions where this information is not exempt would be, in the
• last bullet point from the bill analysis, in the case of personal, financial, and health information
• vote, and it eliminates the restrictions that limit grant contributions as specified in the staff analysis

Summary: The committee met with a quorum present and temporarily postponed SB 480 before taking up four bills. SB 282, relating to home service warranty association finance requirements, was explained as aligning Florida’s home warranty solvency rules with the framework already adopted for motor vehicle extended warranties. Two amendments were adopted: one correcting a cross-reference tied to the $100 million net worth option and another making a technical title change. A representative of the Florida Service Agreement Association waived in support, and the bill was reported favorably. The committee then considered two proposed committee bills preserving public records exemptions. SB 7008 would continue the exemption for certain records held by the Office of Financial Regulation related to financial technology sandbox applications, with staff explaining the exemption is narrow and intended to protect proprietary information. SPB 7010 would continue the exemption for sensitive records held by the Department of Financial Services when acting as receiver for an insolvent insurer, including policyholder personal information, claim data, and trade secrets; staff said the exemption mirrors existing protections and allows consumers to request their own information. Both measures were moved as committee bills and reported favorably. Finally, SB 592 revising the My Safe Florida Condominium Pilot Program was heard. The bill narrows eligibility to certain condominiums, changes owner approval from unanimous consent to 75%, and clarifies eligible roof mitigation techniques. Two amendments were adopted: one requiring the grant work to match the initial inspection report and comply with inspection requirements, and another limiting grants to work that results in a mitigation discount. Testimony was supportive, including from home inspectors and AARP Florida, and senators praised the program’s benefits for hardening homes and lowering insurance costs. SB 592 was reported favorably, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• collected through the job task analysis collected through the job task analysis for<01:20:46.040
• or benefit analysis, that it would be our agency, DES, that would contract a third party?
• or benefit analysis, that it would be our agency, DES, that would contract a third party?
• The analysis on the first page says the bill creates a criminal penalty for declawing a cat.
• on the first penalty uh the analysis on the first page<03:43:20.279> says<03:43:20.560> the

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 153, which would require two or more law enforcement officers in each county to receive animal cruelty training through the police standards system. Representative Barbara Coma, the sponsor, said the bill was prompted by problems in animal cruelty cases, especially in rural areas without animal control officers, and she described it as a limited training measure. She said an amendment was forthcoming that would add an eight-hour approved course and a two-hour refresher every three years, and she emphasized that the trained officers would serve as resources rather than being required to take action themselves. Members asked about cost, due process, overlap with animal control officers, how trained officers would be identified and notified, and whether veterinarians could fill the role. Coma responded that the bill would not be a heavy financial lift, would not interfere with animal control officers, would apply to livestock as well as companion animals, and would still require law enforcement involvement because veterinarians cannot lawfully remove animals from property. She also said the training could improve due process by helping officers better understand when animal removal is appropriate and how cases should proceed. Sheriff William Wright, speaking for the New Hampshire Sheriffs Association, testified in opposition. He said training itself was acceptable, but the bill went beyond training by creating an obligation for sheriffs and state police to respond to and potentially investigate animal cruelty cases, which he argued would be ambiguous, unfunded, and burdensome for staffing and resources. He said some sheriff’s offices do not have investigative deputies and that the bill could create liability and uncertainty about who would lead investigations. In response to questions, he said the association would likely have no objection if the bill were limited to training, but it opposed the assistance/investigation mandate as written.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, in our analysis using Economic Analysis Division statistics on countywide owner-occupied properties
• So, in our analysis<01:25:52.880> using<01:25:53.360> economic<01:25:53.920> analysis
• analysis using economic analysis analysis using economic analysis division<01:25:55.280> statistics
• So a lot of escrow analysis. Right?
• And if you did an analysis, assumptions.

Keywords: 916, all