Transcript Highlights:

• We are currently in the project development phase, which is the first phase of that grant.
• We are currently in the project development phase, which is the first phase of that grant process, and
• They're developed by our Stantec team, who you'll hear from in a moment, and they're based on annual
• In addition to the traffic data itself, we also had a sub-consultant develop independent forecasts of
• compared against the estimates that the progressive design builder is developing.

Committee: Joint Joint Oregon-Washington Legislative Action Committee

Summary: The Joint Committee on Interstate 5 Bridge met remotely with Washington legislative members to receive updates on the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program, including environmental review, cost and funding, tolling, and procurement for construction. Program staff said the final supplemental environmental impact statement was published in April 2026, with a federal record of decision expected in early summer. They described the recommended design as a single-level fixed-span bridge, centered I-5 alignment, C Street ramps, one auxiliary lane in each direction, and dispersed park-and-ride parking. Members raised concerns about transparency, the closed chat function, and the decision not to include two auxiliary lanes; staff said the one-lane option was recommended through consultation with partner agencies and analysis, but the final decision would come with the record of decision. Staff also said the diversion analysis projected less than 3% traffic diversion to I-205 in 2045, though members from Oregon and Washington expressed concern about impacts to their communities and asked for more detail on mitigation and decision-making. The committee also reviewed a major cost update. Staff said the full five-mile program is now estimated at $13.5 billion to $15.2 billion, with a likely cost of $14.4 billion, up from a 2022 estimate of $5 billion to $7.5 billion, citing inflation, schedule delays, scope changes, and more detailed risk modeling. They said the first funded phase has been reduced to a $5.68 billion package focused on the Columbia River bridge replacement, connections to I-5, Hayden Island and SR-14, bridge demolition, tolling infrastructure, and advancing light rail design. Funding for that phase was described as $5.69 billion, including $2.1 billion federal funds, $1 billion from each state, and $1.5 billion in projected toll revenue. Members asked what would happen if costs rise further; staff said the estimate includes substantial contingency, the project will use progressive design-build to manage risk, and the team will continue updating the finance plan annually. A separate tolling and traffic-revenue presentation explained that four toll scenarios were analyzed using regional travel demand modeling, a toll diversion model, and a post-processing review. All scenarios assume pre-completion tolling beginning July 1, 2028, a 50% low-income discount for eligible users, and exemptions for tribal preemptions, emergency vehicles, maintenance vehicles, and organized militia. Staff said the low-income discount would affect about 4% to 6% of annual transactions and reduce annual revenues by roughly 2% to 3%. They said Scenario 2 was used for the financial analysis and is sufficient to support the $1.5 billion toll contribution in the funded phase. Members asked about toll collection costs, revenue impacts of the discount, and how the scenarios differed; staff said collection costs are expected to be in line with other WSDOT toll facilities, but exact costs are not yet set because toll rates are not final. Finally, WSDOT staff outlined procurement and delivery steps for construction. They said WSDOT will be the lead contracting agency, using progressive design-build, with a request for qualifications targeted for early July 2026, a request for proposals in October, contractor selection in April 2027, construction starting in 2028, and tolling beginning in 2028. Staff said the approach is intended to consolidate scope, reduce interface risk, and allow transparent negotiation with an independent cost estimator, while preserving an off-ramp if a fair price cannot be reached. Members asked for more detail on timing, cost allocation, and the share of the first phase funded by tolls; staff estimated tolls account for about 26% of the first phase cost.

Transcript Highlights:

• access to capital funds for their development.
• Do we have any conditional clause prohibiting such a thing, developing?
• They will not be for commercial development of the property. Good. Thank you.
• So is there any—did I miss any amount set aside for water development, water storage development?
• As a result of the bond, is there any feasible area reservoir development plan under planning?

Summary: The subcommittee heard an overview of the May Revision from the Department of Finance and the Legislative Analyst’s Office, focused on resources, environmental protection, energy, and related budget issues. Finance said the May Revision keeps the budget balanced in 2026-27 and 2027-28, narrows the structural deficit, and proposes major investments in natural resources, including Proposition 4 bond funding for the Golden Gate Fields acquisition, wildlife refuge and wetland projects, Fort Ord Dunes campground operations, Healthy Rivers and Landscapes, wildfire-human coexistence, and beverage container recycling. The LAO praised stronger-than-expected revenues but argued the state still has a structural deficit and is relying too heavily on reserves, recommending more reserve deposits and fewer new discretionary expenditures. Members questioned several proposals, especially the Golden Gate Fields purchase and the Healthy Rivers and Landscapes Program. Agency officials said the Golden Gate Fields site is a time-limited opportunity, would be remediated by the current owner, transferred to East Bay Regional Park District after closing, and restricted to park/open-space uses rather than commercial development. On Healthy Rivers and Landscapes, Finance and the Natural Resources Agency said the $25 million request would help launch year one of the program, support scientific monitoring, and maintain commitments to environmental flows and habitat restoration; the LAO said the request was premature because the Bay-Delta plan has not yet been formally adopted and the state’s total funding commitment remains unclear. Officials also discussed water storage, subsidence, and the need for ongoing investments in aquifer recharge, aqueduct repairs, and recycling. The committee also reviewed a proposed $1 million shift for the Coexisting with Wildlife Initiative. Fish and Wildlife and the Cattlemen’s Association said the money would support limited-term staffing, deterrence tools, and livestock-loss compensation, while acknowledging the amount is modest compared with the need. Members emphasized the growing human-wildlife conflict problem and the importance of nonlethal deterrence and public education. The discussion then turned to greenhouse gas reduction fund revenues and transit; members warned that lower auction revenues and possible CARB rule changes could leave little or nothing for Tier 3 programs such as transit, clean water, and air-quality programs. Finance and the LAO said the Legislature should plan for multiple revenue scenarios and consider whether the existing cap-and-invest spending framework still matches current revenue expectations and priorities.

Transcript Highlights:

• Eligible organizations are limited to nonprofit developers, for-profit developers, public housing authorities
• by allowing participating jurisdictions to provide those qualified developers with sales and use tax
• We also appreciate the flexibility that developers..."
• in their community, and Habitat for Humanity is one of those affordable housing developers who would
• in their community, and Habitat for Humanity is one of those affordable housing developers who would

Bills: SB5808 , HB2254 , HB2385 , SB6006 , SB6351 , SB6198 , SB6260 , SB6353 , SB5949 , SB6129 , SB6228 , SB6231 , SB6229 , SB6173

Committee: Senate Ways & Means

Keywords: health insurance, premium assistance, funding, healthcare access, state budget, HB 2254, Washington, Health Care Authority, partnership access line, psychiatric consultation line, first approach skills training, behavioral health, mental health, assessment, administrative costs, health carriers, self-funded plans, multiple employer welfare arrangement, MEWA, employers

Transcript Highlights:

• group, requires a report to the legislature, and requires the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development
• <00:03:59.040><c> to</c><00:03:59.360><c> provide</c><00:03:59.840><c> administrative</c> development
• to provide administrative development to provide administrative support<00:04:00.959><c> to</c><00:04
• As in Hawaii, as we struggle to develop effective strategies to stem the growing tide of gun violence
• need to cross-disciplinary data policy development to serve as a basis for a proactive gun violence

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 3040, which would create an Office of Gun Violence Prevention. Supporters, including Moms Demand Action and a crime-victim advocate, argued the office would improve data collection, research, and coordination to help reduce gun violence. Opponents, including several gun-rights advocates, said the proposal was duplicative, lacked oversight, and would exclude the firearms community. The chair noted 41 testimonies in support and 77 in opposition, but no vote was taken on the bill in the portion provided. The committee then moved through a series of decision-making items and adopted the chair’s recommendations on several measures. SB 17 on wildfire mitigation passed with amendments from multiple agencies and a report date shifted to the 2028 session. SB 2730 on criminal justice reform passed with a defective effective date amendment, SB 2749 on sentencing passed with a defective effective date, SB 2688 on compassionate release passed with amendments narrowing eligibility and adding notification and funding language, and SB 2798 on law enforcement passed with a defective effective date to make the agricultural enforcement pilot program permanent. SB 2645, a short-form bill, was amended to insert substantive provisions and recommitted to the committee. SB 2383, which would have provided a $15,000 retention bonus for sworn law enforcement officers, was reconsidered and held in committee because it was identified as a duplicate. The committee also passed SB 2575, relating to firearms, with amendments adopting a proposed SD1 that would establish minimum mandatory prison terms for certain class A firearm felonies and add clarifying language. SB 2720, which would create a Hawaii firearm injury restitution fund funded by firearm manufacturer licenses, also passed with amendments clarifying the fund’s scope and eligible injuries. Later, the committee began hearing SB 3107 on parole eligibility. The Office of the Public Defender and the Hawaii Paroling Authority supported language allowing the parole board to waive certain program requirements, while the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission opposed the bill, warning it could keep people incarcerated longer if program access remains limited. The Department of Corrections said it is working on classification changes and a pilot project to move inmates through the system faster.

Transcript Highlights:

• There were over 12,000 different PFAS developed.
• There were over 12,000 different PFAS developed.
• </c> &gt;&gt; Um Agra Development Corporation. &gt;&gt; Um Agra Development Corporation.
• And you know, I think Development Corp.
• Our office stands on our Development.

Bills: SB2093 , SB2095 , SB2046 , SB2096 , SB2127 , SB2155 , SB2243

Committee: Senate Agriculture and Environment

Keywords: fuel tank, environmental impact, groundwater, health and safety, military facilities, local communication, advisory committee, Hawaii legislation, PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, forever chemicals, toxic chemicals, environmental contamination, water pollution, drinking water, surface water, soil contamination, fish consumption, food safety, public health

Summary: The joint Senate Agriculture and Environment and Health and Human Services hearing opened with SB 2093, which would require the fuel tank advisory committee to meet at least quarterly and provide funding. The Department of Health offered written testimony, and multiple supporters, including the Honolulu Board of Water Supply, Sierra Club, and a public member of the advisory committee, said more frequent meetings were needed to keep Red Hill cleanup, water testing, and public engagement front and center. Senators asked about public participation and whether the bill should also require meetings outside business hours; testifiers urged at least one evening or weekend meeting to improve access. No vote was taken during the discussion shown. The committee then heard SB 2095, creating a PFAS working group within the Department of Health to study PFAS and related chemicals and report to the Legislature. DOH supported the concept but requested amendments and funding, while the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity deferred to DOH. The Board of Water Supply supported the measure and asked to be included in the working group. Members asked about the bill’s reference to “other residuals,” and DOH explained it could refer to remaining PFAS components in soil, water, or other media. The discussion emphasized the widespread and long-lasting nature of PFAS contamination. Next, the committee considered SB 2046 on underground storage tanks and Red Hill-related cleanup. DOH and the Board of Water Supply testified, and a long list of community and environmental groups supported the bill. Testifiers argued the Navy caused the problem and should be held accountable for cleanup, while one witness said the bill was necessary because the Navy had delayed meaningful remediation. Senators asked whether the bill’s “large landowner” language could include the state or counties under existing statutes; DOH said it would check and later explained that cleanup responsibility generally falls first on the responsible party, then on large landowners if no responsible party exists, with the Navy currently understood to own Red Hill. The hearing then moved to SB 2096 on wastewater management, which the Department of Land and Natural Resources supported, noting PFAS can harm marine resources, and DOH’s wastewater branch offered comments. SB 2127 on water pollution drew support from Agra Business Development Corporation and opposition from the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and others. The main debate centered on runoff, NPDES permitting, and whether the bill could unfairly affect agricultural and public entities; senators and witnesses discussed how heavy rainfall, cesspools, and mixed land uses complicate responsibility and compliance. The transcript ends with the committee still in discussion on SB 2127, with no final votes or actions shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• That to sort of develop that. But it's not an immediate overnight solution type of thing.
• So they're starting to develop this, and after that, we will continue it.
• You talked about the professional development or the staff qualifications.
• We're doing the study, we're going to develop this. You know, we've LIDAR.
• We're looking at how they are developing those relationships with their caregiver.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• DictaFlood would require a model, which is being developed, I understand.
• When it's developed? So the application it's not developed yet?
• So it was initially developed there.
• Water Development Board, who do you give your data to?
• Guthrie Text Disorder Development Board.

Committee: House Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select

Keywords: 997, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are inserting the line, 'approved development plans shall be owned by,' and then it picks up from
• We are inserting the line, 'approved development plans shall be owned by,' and then it picks up from
• And we really would rather just fix the issue for those projects in various phases of development.
• available for historical renovations, many projects started and began and were in various phases of development
• Started and began and were in various phases of development when the Supreme Court changed the law.

Committee: House Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy and the Environment

Summary: The Commerce Committee met in executive session with a quorum present and considered three measures. House Bill 3308 was amended with a committee substitute and a further amendment changing language from “deeded” to “owned” in a provision related to approved development plans; the committee then adopted the substitute and voted the bill do pass unanimously. House Bill 3080, dealing with historic tax credits, was also amended via committee substitute to restore credits for projects already underway after a Supreme Court decision affected the prior law; the committee adopted the substitute and voted the bill do pass by an 8-0 vote with one member present. The committee then took up House Bill 2366, which was described as the “illegal immigrant employee” bill, along with House Bill 2511, which was rolled into the same substitute. The committee substitute made several changes, including replacing “should have known” language with a constructive knowledge standard, requiring cooperation with the attorney general, adding sworn affidavit/perjury provisions, allowing E-Verify as an affirmative defense, limiting suspensions to state licenses and permits after injunction, increasing monetary penalties, authorizing the AG to suspend and punish upon a guilty finding, and granting immunity to contractors who report illegal operators in good faith. After adopting the substitute, the committee voted the combined substitute for House Bills 2366 and 2511 do pass unanimously, then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are inserting the line, 'approved development plans shall be owned by,' and then it picks up from
• We are inserting the line, 'approved development plans shall be owned by,' and then it picks up from
• projects and And we really would rather just fix the issue for those projects in various phases of development
• available for historical renovations, many projects started and began and were in various phases of development
• when the Supreme Court changed. started and began and were in various phases of development when the

Committee: House Commerce

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Sabadosa also filed an amendment for a midwifery workforce development fund to help diversify the midwifery
• filed by Senator Lovely, which unfortunately was not adopted, to support the midwifery workforce development
• Senator Rebecca Rausch for out-of-state resident roof. adopted to support the member free workforce development
• specific amendments that did not get adopted or that were rejected outright that support workforce development
• and on the Senate side by Senator Lovely, neither of which was adopted, was a midwifery workforce development

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The commission met to review the state budget process and discuss maternal and perinatal health funding. Members heard that the House did not adopt several maternal health amendments, including funding for community-based perinatal mental health grants, implementation of maternal health law items, private insurance coverage for midwifery care, a midwifery workforce development fund, birthing center grants, and the Tufts Center for Maternal Health Advancement. On the Senate side, several items were adopted, including funding for the Mass NOW menstrual equity program, $1 million for the Neighborhood Birth Center, and an out-of-state resident reproductive health training pilot; however, proposed funding for a midwifery workforce development fund, a health education trust fund, and the Tufts center was not adopted. Commission members discussed whether to send a letter to the conference committee. Several members emphasized that while the Senate wins were positive, the commission’s core mission is perinatal and postpartum mental health, and that the letter should note the lack of explicit support for perinatal mental health and PMAD-related needs, as well as the importance of infant mental health and the parent-infant relationship. The commission voted unanimously to send a letter to the conference committee highlighting the broader maternal health wins while urging continued investment in perinatal and postpartum supports. The meeting also covered commission vacancies and future planning. Staff reviewed open seats, including a House minority seat, several governor-appointed seats, an optional commissioner seat, and appointments for the Senate and House co-chairs. Members suggested possible representation from the Children’s Trust, families impacted by addiction, and midwifery. The commission also noted that April and June meeting minutes would be circulated for later approval, and that the legislative session is nearing its end with several pending bills related to perinatal mood disorders and postpartum issues. The meeting adjourned after no further new business.

Transcript Highlights:

• testimony on 10 bills concerning voluntary contributions, sales tax, property tax, and economic development
• testimony on 10 bills concerning voluntary contributions, sales tax, property tax, and economic development
• testimony on certain bills related to voluntary contributions, sales tax, property tax, and economic development
• Department of Housing and Urban Development, we finally filed this bill as a means to make use of this
• countries fund, which deals with environmental difficulties in the 17 least developed countries in the

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Revenue

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Revenue held a hybrid hearing on 10 bills covering voluntary contributions, sales tax, property tax, and economic development. Chair Adrian Madaro outlined the process, noted the July 12 reporting deadline for House-filed matters, and explained that written testimony would be accepted through July 7. Testimony was limited to three minutes per speaker, with questions from committee members after each witness. Several local and statewide measures were presented in support. Melrose Mayor Jennifer Grigoratus supported H. 3979, which would authorize Melrose to establish a means-tested senior citizen property tax exemption tied to the state Senior Circuit Breaker credit; she said the program has helped 209 senior households and provides relief of several hundred to about a thousand dollars per household. Michael Memelow of the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination supported H. 3109 and S. 2014, which would create a Massachusetts Against Discrimination Fund allowing voluntary donations, including through tax returns, to help offset uncertainty in federal funding that supports about 20% of MCAD’s operations. Tom Hurley of the Massachusetts Airport Management Association supported H. 3125, which would exempt runway and taxiway infrastructure at privately owned public-use airports from property tax, arguing it would address an economic fairness issue for 10 such airports. Chris Gregory testified in support of H. 3037, a voluntary income tax checkoff for a least developed countries fund administered through Oxfam and the World Bank to support environmental work in the world’s poorest countries. Committee members asked follow-up questions about the number of Melrose households receiving the exemption, the scale and risk of MCAD’s federal funding, dual-filing procedures with the EEOC, the tax burden and local impact of privately owned airports, and the structure and administration of the least developed countries fund. No votes or formal actions were taken during the hearing, and the chair adjourned after testimony concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's a tool that allows for investment into infrastructure that supports development.
• It allows for investment into infrastructure that supports development and that places the cost of that
• development on the actual residents that buy into that development, as opposed to neighbors and cities
• Under this new plan, my understanding of how that would work is that the development team is going to
• be creating this development, this CID, and you would work with that team, and it would be the county

Summary: The House Revenue and Taxation Committee met on March 11, 2026, and heard three bills. House Bill 792, by Rep. Monks, would clarify Idaho’s small seller and occasional seller sales tax exemptions, including how yard sales and other small sales are counted within a calendar year and how taxes apply once sales exceed $5,000 and $7,500. Monks also explained that sellers over $3,000 in annual sales should keep records for four years, though those records are not filed with the Tax Commission. After brief questions about recordkeeping and gun show sales, the committee closed public testimony and advanced the bill to the floor with a due pass recommendation. House Bill 722, by Rep. Ehlers, was presented as a follow-up to last year’s utility tax changes, adjusting timing so utilities do not pay under both the old property-tax system and the new kilowatt-hour tax system. The bill sets six-month reporting and payment periods and addresses how new utility investments are handled for budgeting and tax purposes. After a question from Rep. Cheatham about whether the bill covered non-generation or distribution investments in county buildings, and a response from the Idaho Association of Counties that it could not answer the question, the committee voted to send the bill to the floor with a due pass recommendation. House Bill 811, presented by Chairman Cannon, would expand community infrastructure districts from cities to counties, add a sunset structure for districts and their bonds, and allow a temporary fee to help fund fire protection or emergency medical services. Committee members asked about how unincorporated areas would be included, whether the general plan could be amended, and whether district boundaries could be expanded; attorney Jeremy Piscay explained that amendments and expansions are possible through public notice, hearings, and, where applicable, property owner consent. After discussion of the bill’s dissolution and bond-discharge provisions, the committee approved a motion to send HB 811 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. The committee then adjourned and announced it would meet again the next day at 9 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's a tool that allows for investment into infrastructure that supports development.
• Investment into infrastructure that supports development and that places the cost of that development
• on the actual residents that buy into that development as opposed to neighbors and cities.
• so under this new plan, it would be, I mean, my understanding of how that would work is that the development
• team is going to be creating this development, this CID, and you would work with that team, and it would

Committee: House Revenue and Taxation

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• also agrees to recognize and protect a quantity of water for future state law-based water right development
• also agrees to recognize and protect a quantity of water for future state law-based water right development
• And a pool of that water is specific to municipal development of groundwater, so for St.
• also agrees to recognize and protect a quantity of water for future state law-based water right development
• And a pool of that water is specific to municipal development of groundwater, so for St.

Committee: House Resources and Conservation

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• the requirement that the county formally authorize the land bank, establishment advisory boards, development
• the requirement that the county formally authorize the land bank, establishment advisory boards, development
• the authorization for counties to allow middle housing in limited areas of more intensive rural development
• . ...to it, and a lot of things I think will be very helpful for establishing this process as it develops
• But in the same breath, we also know how important that is to the private sector developers who are also

Summary: The House Housing Committee met to executive several bills, with staff outlining proposed substitutes and key changes before members took a caucus break. House Bill 1974, the land bank bill, was described as removing several original provisions such as county authorization requirements, advisory boards, planning strategies, annual audits, surplus-property prioritization, and a grant program, while adding annual reporting and a real estate excise tax exemption. House Bill 2118, which would limit common interest community associations from imposing more restrictive use covenants than those in place when a unit was acquired, had no amendments but was not moved forward at this time. House Bill 2236, dealing with Housing Finance Commission authority, was explained as clarifying that the commission may not act as a retail mortgage lender or make loans for owner-occupied home purchases or refinancing, except for certain down-payment assistance loans, while adding an intent section to emphasize that the commission is not meant to compete with private lenders. Members debated whether removing language about using public funds could create taxpayer risk or a de facto state bank, but supporters said the changes modernize outdated law and clarify the commission’s role. House Bill 2269, concerning middle housing and on-site sewage systems in LAMIRDs, would restore broader county authority for middle housing in LAMIRDs while limiting sewage-system options based on whether the county is rural or non-rural. The committee voted to report House Bill 1974 out with a due pass recommendation by a 10-7 vote, with several members opposing or voting without recommendation over tax concerns. House Bill 2236 also passed out of committee with a due pass recommendation by a 13-4 vote after similar debate over public-funds language. House Bill 2269 passed unanimously by voice vote, and the committee adjourned after completing its executive action.

Transcript Highlights:

• number twenty-two by Bonnen relates to the authority of the Comptroller to provide funding for the development
• Select HB number sixty by Lopez O'Cameron relates to a study by the Texas Water Development Board of
• HB number sixty-eight by Lopez O'Cameron relates to the study by the Texas Water Development Board on
• the cost of developing flood infrastructure in this state for the Committee on Disaster Preparedness
• No. 156 by Bowers relating to the development and implementation of outdoor warning siren activation

Keywords: 997, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, it will update our strategic plan, including leadership development and some coaching support.
• Leadership development has been a big piece along with our strategic plan. Any questions?
• Probably not, although we are continuing to develop at Flag Mountain.
• We have one contract for website and learning management system development with Desert Wing. ...system
• development with Desert Wing.

Keywords: 924, joint, all

Transcript Highlights:

• WE WILL MOVE FIRST TO THE PRESENTATION BY FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SENATOR NETWORK.
• WE WILL HEAR FROM GREG BRITTON STATE DIRECTOR FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESS SENATOR OF DEVELOPMENT TELLING
• OF THE COMMITTEE, AN HONORED TO BE HERE TODAY TO TELL YOU BUT THE FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESS CENTER DEVELOPMENT
• THIS IS A PRIME EXAMPLE OF HOW WE HAVE REALLY TRIED TO COVER RURAL COMMUNITIES DEVELOP THEIR WITH MANY
• GROUP BUT THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP CONNECTING BUSINESSES TO US.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, it it definitely development.
• </c> professional development for literacy. professional development for literacy.
• </c><00:24:29.840><c> for</c> do professional development for do professional development for everybody
• </c> Senate File 124, Economic Development Senate File 124, Economic Development Rodeo<00:57:52.400><
• ><c> and</c><01:08:36.480><c> Senate</c> Development Rodeo Museum, and Senate Development Rodeo Museum

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It really gave the Department of Corrections broad latitude in terms of the creation and development
• We're talking about human beings and how human beings develop. This is complex.
• We're talking about human beings and how human beings develop. This is complex.
• We're talking about human beings and how human beings develop. This is complex.
• We're talking about human beings and how human beings develop. This is complex.

Committee: House Public Safety Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house