Video & Transcript Research : 'union representation'

Page 3 of 330
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/29/2026 - House Rural Economic Development

Rural Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Bill 2258 adds La Paz County to Area 4 of the six geographical planning areas of Arizona for representation
  • Representative Biasiucci, could this be colloquially known as the 'No taxation without tourism representation
Summary: The Committee on Rural Economic Development met briefly, adopted its committee rules, and heard several bills focused largely on Apache Junction, La Paz County, broadband, transportation, and rural economic development. HB 2258 would add La Paz County to Area 4 for representation on the Tourism Advisory Council and was described as correcting an omission; it passed unanimously 7-0. HB 2065 appropriates $9.5 million for Apache Junction housing infrastructure, rehabilitation, and blight abatement; members discussed statewide housing shortages and the need for targeted rural-adjacent investment, and the bill passed 6-1. The committee then considered HB 2066, which appropriates $8 million for broadband and fiber optic expansion in Apache Junction. The sponsor emphasized rural connectivity and safety concerns, especially for the Navajo Nation and students, and expressed openness to federal BEAD funding and amendments; the bill passed 6-1. HB 2106, an emergency measure to direct undistributed county transportation excise tax revenues to ADOT for Pinal County road projects, was explained as a way to use escrowed funds for the voters’ intended purpose after litigation over the tax; it passed unanimously 7-0. Finally, HB 2071 would appropriate $15.5 million for a rural business and workforce hub, infrastructure revitalization, and a rural health and community services facility in Apache Junction. Members discussed whether the proposal should be broadened to other rural areas and the need for accountability and possible amendments, including for the Navajo Nation; it passed 6-1. The chair noted that one remaining bill would be held for the next agenda, and the committee adjourned.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It would require that if indigency is shown and the appointed attorney is not part of a public representation
  • I am the director of family protection representation at the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and I'm
  • criminal indigent defense fee schedules when we've asked them to submit their family protection representation
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Legal representation would truly change that.
  • people who claim they feel like a lost child, and a lot of research shows that when there is legal representation
  • 01:40:36.000> legal that there is when there is legal that there is when there is legal representation
  • > given<01:40:37.360> it<01:40:37.520> has<01:40:37.760> impacted representation
  • given it has impacted representation given it has impacted many<01:40:38.480> children's<01:40
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/03/2026 - Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Bills: HB2148, HB2993
Summary: The Committee on Appropriations, Transportation and Technology heard a presentation on advanced air mobility, featuring video and remarks about new aircraft technologies, including drones and electric vertical takeoff and landing craft. The presentation emphasized potential uses such as medical delivery, rescue operations, passenger and cargo transport, quieter flight profiles, and the need for coordination among industry, government, NASA, the FAA, and other partners. Members also noted an upcoming display of a Pivotal aircraft on the Senate lawn. The committee then considered House Bill 2148, which would grant the legislature authority to appropriate non-constitutional federal monies and require the legislature to specify the purposes for which those funds are spent, with a delayed effective date of January 1, 2027. Supporters described it as a transparency and separation-of-powers measure, while opponents argued it would interfere with existing federal funding structures and state programs. The bill received a do-pass recommendation on a 6-4 vote. House Bill 2993 was also heard. It would appropriate $6.4 million from the Consumer Protection/Consumer Fraud Revolving Fund to the Department of Public Safety for FY 2026 and exempt DPS from the statutory restriction on employing legal counsel without approval. Testimony from the Arizona State Troopers Association supported the funding as an emergency need to avoid cuts to recruit classes, overtime, and patrol car purchases, but several members objected to combining the appropriation with the outside-counsel policy change. The committee approved the bill on a 6-4 do-pass vote. The meeting concluded with announcements about upcoming committee events and adjournment.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • getting into how we make a Minnesota-specific strategy, I'd like to invite up my first testifier. unions
  • and miners is oftentimes unions and miners is oftentimes unethical<00:35:49.080> standards.
  • Gilbertson and I am the Minnesota Policy Organizer for the BlueGreen Alliance, a coalition of labor unions
  • Gilbertson and I am the Minnesota Policy Organizer for the Blue Green Alliance, a coalition of labor unions
  • Gilbertson, and I am the Minnesota Policy Organizer for the BlueGreen Alliance, a coalition of labor unions
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions, February 18, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:12:20.000> banks<00:12:20.320> and<00:12:20.560> credit<00:12:20.959> unions
  • <00:12:21.440> They for banks and credit unions. They for banks and credit unions.
  • Chairman, on behalf of Wyman Credit Unions, we stand in support of this bill.
  • Chairman, on behalf of Wyman Credit<00:22:12.000> Unions,<00:22:12.320> we<00:22:12.559
  • , we we're uh we stand in Credit Unions, we we're uh we stand in support<00:22:13.679> of<00:22
Bills: SF0114, SF0102, SF0117
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • that's in back of this and highly unions that's in back of this and highly supports<00:18:44.320>
  • We got the<00:18:50.080> electrical<00:18:50.559> union,<00:18:51.039> the<00:18
  • other labor unions that are interested in joining as well.
  • So, I'm just curious how that's supposed to work with the private unions.
  • work with the private unions. work with the private unions.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the First Minnesota Volunteer Infantry saved the Union at the Battle of Gettysburg.
  • But what would have happened had the Union caved on that far flank?
  • But what would have happened had the Union caved on that far flank?
  • But what would have happened had the Union caved on that far flank?
  • Their sacrifice, their willingness to go forth and save the Union knowing what was going to happen.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Tue Mar 24, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • /c><01:18:06.360> not ...in jeopardy of losing their nonprofit status, which would include unions
Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2433 SD1 relating to condominiums, which would direct the condominium education trust fund toward educational resources for unit owners and require the Real Estate Commission to ensure owners’ interests are represented in funded activities and related rulemaking. Supporters, including the Hawaii Real Estate Commission and a condominium owner advocate, said owners need a seat at the table in condo governance and education efforts. Committee discussion focused on whether the bill was necessary, with the Real Estate Commission indicating it could already use the trust fund for owner education and that owners are already considered stakeholders, though not through a specific commission seat. No vote was taken during the excerpted discussion. The committee then took up SB 2047 SD2 HD1 on pharmacy benefit managers, which would set requirements for maximum allowable cost reimbursement, allow reverse-and-rebill claims after successful appeals, and authorize fines for violations. The Insurance Division offered comments, the Hawaii Pharmacists Association supported the measure with amendments and suggested future PBM reform funding, and Kaiser Permanente requested a technical amendment. A committee question raised whether the staffing and resource request for implementation was too large for a bill focused only on MAC pricing, and the witness said he would provide more data to the next committee. No final action was shown. Next was SB 2425 SD2 HD1 on health insurance and substance use disorder treatment, requiring insurers to honor written assignments of benefits to SUD providers and prohibiting anti-assignment clauses. Supporters described patients being unable to access treatment because of high out-of-pocket costs and said direct payment would reduce harm for people in recovery. HMSA opposed the bill but said it would begin direct payments to non-participating SUD facilities effective March 27, while continuing to object to the assignment-of-benefits portion because of fraud and balance-billing concerns; the Hawaii Association of Health Plans also opposed. Members questioned HMSA about reimbursement mechanics and why the bill was needed if coverage policies were already changing. Finally, the committee heard SB 3045 SD1 HD1, which would require coverage of continuous glucose monitors and related supplies, including for Medicaid managed care, under certain conditions. DHS and the Insurance Division offered comments, while SHPDA, Hilo Benioff Medical Center Foundation, and others supported the bill, citing inconsistent access and a case in which a woman allegedly died after being denied a CGM. HMSA said it already covers medically necessary CGMs and had updated its policy in 2025 for type 1 and insulin-dependent patients, but it raised concerns about expanding mandated coverage to type 2 and gestational diabetes and about supply impacts. The committee also discussed whether the bill duplicated existing coverage standards and why it had been introduced repeatedly. No votes or final dispositions were included in the excerpt.