Video & Transcript Research : 'tort liability'

Page 3 of 259
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • However, due to these companies' concerns about potential liability, especially if the incident occurs
  • on the books to protect someone who stops to read. to someone who needs medical help from legal liability
  • Lastly, the substitute ensures that the liability protection extends to those responding to the emergency
  • Members, the committee substitute extends the liability protection to aggregate production operations
  • That's why we put some of the liability protection ends for the KILNs and the APOs so that they have
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources (Part II) Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources took public testimony on Senate Bill 1757 and its committee substitute, a measure dealing with aggregate production operations and a new permitting option for rock crushers/aggregate facilities. Testimony centered on whether the bill should remain focused on air permitting or also include broader quarry operations such as stormwater, reclamation, monitoring, and public participation requirements. Supporters of the substitute, including representatives of the Texas Aggregate and Concrete Association and Associated General Contractors, said the bill would provide a voluntary third permitting option, preserve existing authorizations, and create a more practical regulatory path for Texas growth. Opponents and critics, including representatives of Texas for Responsible Aggregate Mining, Job Materials, and Public Citizen, argued the bill as written was too weak or too broad in the wrong ways. They said best management practices should be set in statute or through negotiated rulemaking rather than left to TCEQ rulemaking, and they raised concerns about limited monitoring periods, vague air-monitoring standards, public notice procedures, and the inclusion of non-air requirements in an air permit. Several witnesses said the bill should better balance industry needs with neighborhood impacts and public health protections. Chair Birdwell questioned witnesses about ongoing negotiations between industry groups and said the bill was intended to be a practical compromise. After testimony and questions, public testimony was closed. The committee left SB 1757 and its committee substitute pending, with no vote taken.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources (Part II) Mar 12th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • When a well is orphaned, the state assumes the liability of the well in perpetuity.
  • 1146 will allow operators to assist in plugging or replugging orphaned wells without assuming the liability
  • plug a problematic orphan well with allocated public funds or adopt the well and the associated liability
  • well plugger approved by the railroad commission to plug or replug a well without taking on the liability
  • If you could remove that from the surface owner's liability, it might encourage that.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Apr 3rd, 2025 at 02:30 pm

Energy and Natural Resources

Bills: SB2339
Summary: The Energy and Natural Resources Committee continued work on House Bill 1459, which concerns rare earth and critical mineral recovery from North Dakota lignite coal. Testimony from UND researcher Dan Ludo and industry representative David Straely focused on the urgency of developing the process quickly, the technical differences between extracting minerals from coal versus ash, and the potential value of elements such as terbium, dysprosium, gallium, germanium, and synthetic graphite. Straely argued the bill is constitutional, limited to minerals within the coal seam, and needed to avoid years of quiet title litigation and provide certainty for development and compensation to royalty owners. Committee members raised questions about landowner rights, compensation levels, possible amendments from the Department of Trust Lands, and whether the bill should be modified to address constitutional concerns or sunset provisions. No final action was taken on HB 1459; the chair said parties could work on language until Monday before the committee revisits it. The committee then returned to House Bill 1579, a high-load study bill with a possible energy infrastructure investment amendment. Jody Smith of the Retirement and Investment Office presented updated language adding guardrails for in-state infrastructure investing, including requiring approved projects to be underwritten and managed by a qualified investment manager or financial institution and to follow the Legacy Fund investment policy. Members discussed whether the amendment had been shared with the House sponsor and noted that the related bill 1330 was still pending, so HB 1579 was being held for the time being. Finally, the committee took up House Bill 1566, which had an amendment from the Agriculture Commissioner’s office. The committee adopted the amendment 7-0, then passed a due-pass motion on the amended bill and referred it to Appropriations, also by a 7-0 vote. Members discussed the bill’s fiscal impact, including an estimated $580,000 for two FTEs over two years, and clarified that the study component remains in the bill. Senator Gerhardt was assigned to carry the measure.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And eventually it gets to the point where it's sold for the plugging liability only.
  • know, sometimes there's not great behavior and, you know, they sell. the wells for their plug-in liability
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Orphan Wells members are inactive non-commissioned 7 8 9 bringing orphaned wells without assuming the liability
  • plug a problematic orphan well with allocated public funding. or adopt the well and the associated liability
  • Railroad Commission or pay a well plugger approved by the Railroad Commission to plug or replug a well. liability
  • committee substitute will remove section C2 that was added inadvertently and would have complicated liability
  • In reduced language, liability stays with the state as is the case with current state plugging activity
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • substitute and is recognized to explain the substitute and the differences. up to which simply provides liability
  • A 30.06 or a 30.07 sign would be protected from liability because they have allowed their customers to
  • Under the committee substitute, it's civil liability only, and again, we don't say who wins or who loses
  • does the exact opposite, where if you do put up the sign, it directly puts up a little bit more liability
  • Create liability for having a 51% sign.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Transportation May 8th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so from that standpoint, I'm in favor of, but I think the liabilities, uh, should be more clearly
  • This would increase the limit of liability in claims involving textile totaling $10,000 to 100,000 by
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation May 8th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so from that standpoint, I'm in favor, but I think the liabilities should be met.
  • This would increase the limit of liability and claims involving TxDOT totaling $10,000 to $100,000 by
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • a determination, Oklahoma is a contributory negligent state, and so you assign the percentage of liability
  • Well, what about the liability that might be attached to some product they're selling?
  • which by the way is on page 10, if you're looking forward, it's for the purpose of the government tort
  • So that limits what we're really talking about is a tort claim. You're recognized. Thank you, Mr.
  • But I think again, it's just about tort claims. So it's a liability kind of question. They're not.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 21st, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • At the same time, the The bill creates obligations and liability on a wide range of online services,
  • have been discussions that are highly appreciated, like addressing some secondary and intermediary liability
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • With respect to the 90%, what is the best way to avoid criminal liability?
  • So you could insulate yourself from criminal liability for that retainage amount through the same tactic
  • This bill represents a massive expansion of liability for owners, both personal liability and cutting
  • It's very unusual, doesn't happen often, and this bill, by massively expanding on liability, is too big
  • If it was the opposite, I could say, see how that's a massive expansion of liability, but 10% added to