Video & Transcript : 'taxi technology fee' :

Page 3 of 500
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Mar 2nd, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • Those are not autonomous technologies.
  • Like you mentioned, if you're going to be taking a look at AVs who are doing a robo-taxi or a robo-taxi
  • We're not anti-technology.
  • First and foremost, I believe in the promise of AV technology, a technology that can perform the entirety
  • First and foremost, I believe in the promise of AD technology, a technology that can perform the entirety
Summary: The committee held a work session on autonomous vehicles, beginning with an overview from the Washington State Transportation Commission on the state’s five-year AV work group. The commission described its 2018 legislative mandate, the 35-member executive committee and seven subcommittees, and the resulting 29 recommendations and “roadmap to the future.” The presentation emphasized six policy “building blocks” for Washington: agency readiness, public outreach, equity, safety, testing and pilots, and a path to deployment. It also noted current Washington law requires AV testing companies to self-certify with the Department of Licensing, carry $5 million in liability insurance, report collisions and violations, and notify local law enforcement before testing; three companies are currently certified. State regulators from California and Arizona then outlined their AV frameworks. California described its long-running permit system for testing with and without a safety driver and for commercial deployment, its current rulemaking to expand use cases to heavy-duty trucks and passenger shuttles, and new requirements for mileage, operational assessments, and more detailed crash and incident reporting. California also said it is creating a new enforcement tool allowing citations to be issued to manufacturers for moving violations by AVs. Arizona described its executive-order-based approach, later codified by statute, which allows testing and driverless operations through self-certification, law enforcement interaction plans, quarterly meetings with companies, and reporting of crashes or near misses; Arizona also said it tracks crashes monthly and has not recorded fatalities attributed to AVs. Industry representatives from Waymo, Zoox, and the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association argued that AVs can improve safety, accessibility, and mobility while creating jobs. They described extensive sensor systems, community outreach, first-responder engagement, and current operations in multiple cities. Waymo cited more than 127 million rider-only miles and said its data show large reductions in injury-causing and pedestrian crashes; Zoox said it operates in Las Vegas, San Francisco, and Seattle and stressed its purpose-built electric robotaxi and local jobs; AVIA said its members have driven more than 145 million autonomous miles and that 26 states now expressly authorize driverless operations. Members asked about public education, crash and fatality tracking, enforcement, weather, school zones, first-responder interactions, and labor impacts. Labor and public-safety witnesses from the Teamsters, firefighters, and driver unions opposed commercial AV deployment without stronger safeguards. They argued Washington should not be an unregulated testing ground, especially for heavy trucks and hazardous materials, and warned of job losses for drivers, taxi and rideshare workers, and related occupations. Firefighters and driver representatives raised concerns about AVs interfering with emergency scenes, blocking responders, and creating risks in dynamic roadway incidents. Committee members also asked for comparisons to human-driven vehicles, data on citations and crashes, and more information on how AVs interact with pedestrians, first responders, and workers.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Transportation - 03/25/26

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • fee that we pay in, and that money is used to offset taxi license fees for those who provide more disability
  • The money is used to offset taxi license fees for those who provide more disability transportation than
  • Pay fee here, pay fee there.
  • on fee after fee, and like we're adding on fee after fee, and uh,<01:40:48.120><c> you</c><01:40:48.200
  • </c> unproven technology. unproven technology.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • There is also a fee that is charged.
  • Our recent partnership with taxi services, particularly ramp taxis, offers a promising path forward to
  • Do you separately list out, like Uber does, the booking fee, which is the insurance fee?
  • Do you separately list out like Uber does the booking fee, which is the insurance fee?
  • “Do you separately list out, like Uber does, the booking fee, which is the insurance fee, on Lyft?”
Summary: The hearing focused on transportation network companies in California, with the chair framing it as an informational hearing on the history, regulation, safety, climate, accessibility, and data issues surrounding Uber, Lyft, and smaller or autonomous TNC services. The CPUC described its decade-long regulatory role, including safety rules, background checks, insurance requirements, reporting obligations, and two major legislative programs from 2018: the Clean Miles Standard and the Access for All program. Members asked about complaint trends, data collection and disclosure, program implementation, and how the CPUC uses annual reports for policymaking, compliance, and program oversight. Uber and Lyft said the statewide framework has supported growth while providing safety and access benefits, but both companies emphasized that insurance is a major cost driver and argued that California’s UM/UIM requirement is unusually high compared with other vehicles. They said the Clean Miles Standard is pushing electrification but faces headwinds from EV affordability and charging infrastructure, while Access for All has expanded wheelchair-accessible service but still needs continued support. They also discussed transit partnerships, wildfire response, and the potential role of autonomous vehicles, with both companies saying human drivers will remain important and that future regulation should account for new technology. The final panel, including the San Francisco County Transportation Authority and UC Berkeley researchers, presented evidence that TNCs have increased congestion and reduced transit ridership, especially in dense urban areas. They described prior research showing TNCs contributed to congestion growth in San Francisco and noted that this work helped spur local taxes on ride-hailing trips to fund safety and transit improvements. The panel also discussed the CPUC’s evolving data-disclosure decisions, arguing that public access to TNC trip data is important for understanding transportation impacts and informing local policy.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans Jan 20th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans

Transcript Highlights:
  • Welcome to the meeting of the Technology, Economic Development and Veterans Committee.
  • House Bill 2446 relates to developing the quantum technology industry.
  • Other states are moving aggressively to attract this emerging technology.
  • But I also know that, just like every other technology, it has... ...with quantum.
  • My name is Laura Ruderman, and I am the CEO of the Technology Alliance, a nonpartisan...
Bills: HB2357 , HB2365 , HB2446
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Technology and Telecommunications REVISED Feb 19th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Technology and Telecommunications

Transcript Highlights:
  • We just have a problem with the technology transfer.
  • So, the current technology transfer was written in 1989.
  • But what we don't have is a great technology Transfer.
  • Technology.
  • My research from places like the Center for Democracy and Technology indicates that Technology indicates
Bills: SB1670 , SB1716 , SB1521
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Insurance Apr 8th, 2026

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's also much fewer taxi cabs, like you said. There's not as many.
  • You can see a taxi cab and what they look like if they're pulled over.
  • Uber is a technology platform. They are outside of Louisiana.
  • What did the taxis have? Do taxis have UM? No. Taxis face other types of insurance.
  • So we specifically control the risk that taxi cab companies put on the road.
Committee: House Insurance
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Rules Committee Feb 4th, 2026 at 01:15 pm

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • I disagree that pushing back on the use of technology, which can help make us more efficient, safer,
  • employer-integrated earned wage access that will be overseen by DFI, and then it puts some limits on fees
  • And, you know, that was a long time ago when they were driving taxis in Uber.
  • I recall there being doctors saying they were driving taxis because they couldn't get licenses here.
  • And, you know, that was a long time ago when they were driving taxis in Uber.
Committee: Senate Rules
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Communications and Conveyance Committee Jun 18th, 2025

Communications and Conveyance

Transcript Highlights:
  • There is also a fee that is charged.
  • Our recent partnership with taxi services, particularly ramp taxis, offer a promising path forward to
  • Do you separately list out, like Uber does, the... booking fee, which is the insurance fee, on Lyft?
  • So how is it, the insurance fee, currently?
  • standard fee, but these are pennies compared to insurance.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Insurance Apr 8th, 2026

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's also much fewer taxi cabs, like you said. There's not as many.
  • You can see a taxi cab and what they look like if they're pulled over.
  • Uber is a technology platform. They are outside of Louisiana.
  • What did the taxis have? Do taxis have UM? No, taxis face other types of insurance.
  • So we specifically control the risk that taxi cab companies put on the road.
Committee: House Insurance
Summary: The committee first took up HB 774, which would extend required hearing-aid coverage for certain individuals up to age 26. Representative Boyer said the bill helps young adults maintain access to hearing aids during school and early work years. The Louisiana Academy of Audiology supported the measure, and the committee adopted technical amendments and reported the bill favorably as amended. The committee then heard extensive testimony on HB 702, which would require transportation network companies to provide uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Representative Landry and supporters argued that current law and court rulings have left injured drivers and passengers without meaningful coverage in some cases, especially for riders who do not own cars and therefore lack personal UM coverage. Insurance agents and legal witnesses said they cannot currently find a product to cover the driver in certain ride-share phases, while Uber representatives opposed the bill, warning it would raise fares and noting that drivers already have optional occupational accident coverage and that passengers’ own UM coverage would generally apply. After debate over costs, coverage gaps, and whether the issue should instead be studied further, the committee voted to voluntarily defer the bill. The committee next considered HB 477, as substituted, which would require coverage for prosthetic and custom orthotic devices and associated services. Representative Ebert and witnesses described the bill as a modernization of existing coverage rules so people with limb loss can obtain more than one medically necessary device, including activity-specific prosthetics. Testimony from amputees and a physical therapist emphasized the impact on mobility, work, sports, and quality of life. The committee adopted the substitute and reported the bill favorably by substitute. The committee also reported HB 76, which updates oral anti-cancer medication parity rules, by adopting amendments that clarify applicability and exempt certain limited-benefit and ERISA self-funded plans. HB 903, which increases the commissioner of insurance’s fine authority, was amended to set higher aggregate caps and then reported favorably. Finally, HB 291, which would prohibit health plans from penalizing hospitals when a member of the care team is out of network, drew support from the sponsor and the Louisiana Hospital Association as a preventative measure against insurer pressure tactics; Louisiana Blue opposed it, citing cost concerns and questioning the need for the bill. The transcript ends during that bill’s hearing, before final action is shown.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House State Government Committee Feb 26th, 2025

State Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, if y'all have government technology fever, I have the bill for you. It is HB207.
  • I got to know Secretary Kart, who heads up the Office of Information Technology for the State.
  • In 2017, it was updated to actually run technology.
  • It also creates a technology quality assurance board, which serves as a clearinghouse between the various
  • departments to discuss technology and to stay on the same page.
Bills: HB320 , HB207 , HB208 , HB290
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Apr 27th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 1250 creates the public safety technology revolving fund to be used by the office of the attorney
  • fund grants to local law enforcement divisions to cover some of the costs associated with using technology
  • This is available for local law enforcement to help them with their technology needs.
  • And I don't see any definitions around the technology that would be covered through this grant process
  • The measure provides a spouse and child or children of Goldar recipients with free tuition, fees, and
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 12th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • 'defense' to the list of industries that this bill is guiding or pushing guidance of transfer. technology
  • President, members, Senate Bill 1670 requires the state regents to update technology transfer guidance
Bills: SB1696 , SB1670 , SB1687 , SB1975
TX
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Swipe cap or fee caps.
  • those fees every single time.
  • Where do those fees come from?
  • We're talking about the calculation of fees in the course of... A transaction using technology.
  • Fee caps aren't the answer.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Jan 29th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Technologies are definitely emerging.
  • Our goal was to select a technology that could be deployed quickly.
  • the recommendation is to create a technology marketplace.
  • technology, that's something we definitely see further down the road.
  • technology. of higher accuracy, perhaps using your vehicles on board technology.
Bills: HB2347 , HB2410
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 5th, 2026 at 04:07 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • It updates certain agriculture fees every so often.
  • This gives a list of the fees, a list of where we're at, all the different things.
  • These will, in case you don't know, these fees will go through a board.
  • And so we never have the wherewithal to raise fees.
  • There's a lot of fees in here.
Bills: SB145 , SB143
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Transportation Feb 27th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • It provides that the first $25 of the documentary service fee, instead of 50% of the $50 fee increase
  • We can use parking fees and taxes as well through this legislation.
  • A fiscal note reveals estimated enforcement fee revenue from the fee increase to be around $5.2 million
  • How do you feel about other zero-emission technologies?
  • I don't know what other technologies you may refer to.
Summary: The committee first held an executive session on several transportation measures heard earlier in the session, including bills on rounding cash transactions to eliminate pennies, vehicle title transfers to insurers, a memorial bridge naming, BAT lane access for private employer transportation services, oil tanker escort requirements, Traffic Safety Commission authority, fifth-wheel trailer length, electric vehicle sales and funding, and vehicle loads on public highways. Most of the measures were advanced with due pass recommendations to the Rules Committee, and the committee adopted amendments on the penny-rounding bill, the EV funding bill, and the vehicle-loads bill. Members noted some opposition or reservations on a few items, including the penny-rounding proposal and the vehicle-loads amendment, but the motions carried. The committee then returned to public hearing on several bills. Substitute House Bill 2323 would create a blue envelope program for neurodiverse drivers to help communicate with law enforcement during traffic stops; the Department of Licensing and State Patrol fiscal notes were described, and the bill drew strong support in signed-in testimony. Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2588 would expand county ferry district authority to include vehicle ferries and require voter approval for new taxes after the effective date; testimony was mixed, with Whatcom County officials and ferry users supporting the bill as a funding tool, while one opponent criticized the tax and timing provisions. The committee also heard public testimony on Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2172, which would change the route jurisdiction transfer and abandonment process for state highways by requiring agreements or legislative review for longer abandonments or bridge transfers; cities, counties, the Transportation Commission, and the TIB supported the bill as a more transparent process. Additional public hearings covered Substitute House Bill 2203, creating reckless interference with emergency operations for drivers who bypass emergency road closures; a defense-lawyer witness opposed the mandatory license suspension, while the sponsor described the bill as a response to flood and fire rescues. Substitute House Bill 2410 would create a Commercial Truck Safety and Education Council and raise the commercial vehicle safety enforcement fee from $16 to $32 per vehicle; the trucking industry and business groups supported it as a safety and training investment. The committee also heard a staff briefing and sponsor testimony on Second Substitute House Bill 1923, the Mosquito Fleet Act, which would expand passenger-only ferry district options and was presented as a local tool to improve ferry access and relieve Washington State Ferries congestion.