Video & Transcript Research : 'fee phaseout'

Page 3 of 415
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, this bill relates to student access to certain academic records, authorizing a fee.
  • Our Health Sciences Centers, if you look... at the overall makeup of their budget from tuition and fees
  • We've been working very hard to hold tuition and fees. steady now, I believe this is the third session
  • College application fees alone can be a deterrent. current for prospective students.
  • Research shows that application fees, even modest ones, can discourage students from applying to malls
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The fee has not changed since 1980, number one.
  • where the fee is.
  • But fee-wise, it would be in line with university fees. Thank you. Yes, sir. Okay.
  • Do they see in their tuition and fees as compared to a resident of Texas?
  • They would see the same increase because it would be a mandatory fee.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Transportation, Highways and Public Works May 14th, 2026

Transportation, Highways & Public Works

Transcript Highlights:
  • And a license is reinstated once all the fees are paid? Witness: Yes.
  • Witness: There isn't a fiscal note, but of course there were fees for the first three late fees, so there
  • I'll ask you online here: is that, I mean, we're raising fees on one.
  • I'm interested in putting a voluntary fee on for litter abatement.
  • So this is all a convenience fee. Somebody agrees to pay this voluntarily.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • And for the banking department, it's been 20 years since they've had a fee increase.
  • So to adjust for inflation, the fee goes from $3,000 to $4,000 for an original license, and then the
  • The 10,000-foot view of the picture of what we're trying to solve is charging a fee for services already
  • I think that was the intent of the original statute back in the 2013 pass that prohibited response fees
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, this just kind of explains that the key here is that the phaseout begins at about $120,000 income
  • So, this just kind of explains that the key here is that the phaseout begins at about $120,000 income
  • So, this just kind of explains that the key here is that the phaseout begins at about $120,000 income
  • So, this just kind of explains that the key here is that the phaseout begins at about $120,000 income
  • individuals will have their legal fees individuals will have their legal fees taxed<00:29:33.520
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on House File 5055, the governor’s supplemental tax budget. Commissioner of Revenue Paul Marquart outlined the proposal as a balanced budget package that would leave a positive bottom line in the current biennium and beyond. He emphasized family-focused tax relief, especially a new refundable young child credit for children ages 0 to 4, which would provide up to $3,000 for one child or $6,000 for two or more, benefit about 104,000 families, and phase out at higher incomes. He also described federal conformity changes, including updates to business interest deductions, dependent care credits, and Section 179 expensing, along with omitted federal items such as research expensing and opportunity zones due to cost and policy concerns. Marquart also defended broader tax modernization proposals, including expanding the sales tax to selected consumer services such as accounting, banking, brokerage, and legal services while lowering the statewide sales tax rate, and creating a social media tax on consumer data collection that would fund an AI readiness special revenue fund rather than the general fund. He said these changes would make the sales tax less regressive and better aligned with the modern economy. Additional provisions mentioned included a gun-related gross receipts tax on firearms and ammunition, cannabis tax technical changes, historic structure rehabilitation conformity, and added auditors for tax compliance. Testimony from outside groups was mixed. Nan Madden of the Minnesota Budget Project supported the governor’s approach as a response to federal tax and spending changes, praised the decision not to conform to opportunity zones or federal no-tax-on-tips/overtime provisions, and urged even stronger revenue measures. Brian Lake of the Minnesota State Bar Association strongly opposed the proposed sales tax on consumer legal services, arguing it would burden low- and middle-income people in sensitive cases and create unfairness when individuals litigate against the state. Tanner Fritsinger of the Minnesota Association of Professional Employees supported the sales tax base expansion and the social media tax as ways to broaden revenue without raising the base rate. The committee chair thanked the commissioner and then began hearing public testimony, with additional testifiers queued up.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Tax, Business and Transportation Jan 29th, 2026 at 02:36 pm

Senate Tax, Business & Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • So what this bill did in 2020 is create a $100 fee on large pet food manufacturers.
  • This whole question about whether this is a tax or a fee is something that's been in federal court.
  • So that's how it works; it's just a hundred dollar fee. Again, in fairness, Mr.
  • How do the fee structures work to ensure that it's really fair? Just introduce yourself.
  • What is the typical fee for a neuter?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Transportation Funding Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on Transportation Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • medical care Like other segments of SH-130, segments 5 and 6 require veterans to pay the full toll fees
  • Authority a transportation authority with reasonable fees under current law municipalities that choose
  • to do so through a citizen vote face significant challenges exit fees are calculated Not based on the
  • Second, it bases exit... fees on actual value, not a population-based share of debt, which makes much
  • And third, it requires annual public disclosure of each city's estimated exit fee.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Transportation Funding Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on Transportation Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • local spending, we spend over $10 billion a year from general taxpayer funds, not gas taxes or vehicle fees
  • , to build and maintain our roads, on top of another $10 billion or so that comes from user fees.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • They would have to have exempt plates not to be charged a fee.
  • It just exempts the fee, as we have done for as long as the DMV has been in existence.
  • I was under the opinion that this was no longer to be a fee associated with the overall bond.
  • I think the intent here is to be clear: you get the permit, you just don't have to pay the fee.
  • Just like you could either pay the fee if you were not a government entity, and then you'd be exempt.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 4/15/26

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The group agreed that the dental fee The group agreed that the dental fee schedule<00:02:55.720>
  • stated, uh Minnesota's fee-for-service stated, uh Minnesota's fee-for-service dental<00:04:55.520
  • dividing up simply the fee-for-service. dividing up simply the fee-for-service.
  • language about newborn screening fee language about newborn screening fee exception. exception.
  • . registration fee.
Bills: HF4401, HF4466
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • another park in my district, I recently learned of a resident who gets charged $25 per week as a late fee
  • week<01:02:19.839> as<01:02:20.079> a<01:02:20.240> late<01:02:20.480> fee
  • <01:02:21.119> on charged $25 per week as a late fee on charged $25 per week as a late fee
Bills: HF3403, HF2687, HF2381
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services May 13th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 1522 also provides needed clarity to other areas of the Act, such as how entrance fees are escrowed
  • when a CCRC undergoes expansion and when entrance fees need to be returned to a prospective resident
  • Members, group home consultants receive referral fees for directing potential residents to group homes
  • are advertising on national TV, and they are used by franchises as referral systems, so they do get a fee
  • are advertising on national TV, and they are used by franchises as referral systems, so they do get a fee
Summary: The Committee on Human Services met with a quorum and first voted out Senate Bill 1589, relating to contract requirements between a single-source continuum contractor and DFPS. The motion to report the bill favorably to the full House with a recommendation that it do pass and be printed prevailed on a 7-0 vote. The committee then heard Senate Bill 500, which would set deadlines for providing foster care adoption records, including health, social, educational, and genetic history reports, to speed adoptions. The bill’s author and witnesses from Addie’s Hope Social Services supported it, saying delays in redacted files can take months, slow permanency for children, and increase costs to the state. Members asked about redactions and sibling/family information, and witnesses explained the bill would mainly speed the preliminary file used to decide whether to proceed with placement. SB 500 was left pending. Members also heard Senate Bill 1266, which would require regular reevaluation of the Medicaid provider support team and add written notice of provider disenrollment at least 30 days in advance. There were no witnesses, no questions, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1522, concerning continuing care retirement communities, was then laid out and supported by LeadingAge Texas and counsel, who said it updates outdated definitions, clarifies licensing and disclosure rules, and strengthens consumer protections for seniors. It was also left pending. After a brief recess, the committee heard Senate Bill 1137, which would prohibit group home consultants from referring people to unlicensed or unpermitted group homes except in limited circumstances, require disclosure of complaints, and create a Class B misdemeanor for violations. Members discussed whether consultants are regulated and noted concerns about unlicensed referral practices. The bill was left pending, and the committee adjourned after completing its agenda.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/10/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Transcript Highlights:
  • Groundwater withdrawal fee structure.
  • 2026 withdrawal fee collection.
  • 2932 groundwater transportation fee website and post.
  • groundwater transportation fees that are already in law.
  • The bill also outlines accounting and usage requirements for the collected fee and states...
Summary: The committee on Natural Resources, Energy and Water heard and advanced several bills and memorials focused on water policy, mining, environmental regulation, and professional licensing. HB 2260, a veterinary board measure, HB 2986, an ADEQ cleanup/omnibus bill, and HB 2827, which extends Pinal AMA groundwater fee authority and related fund deadlines, all received due pass recommendations on unanimous 10-0 votes. HB 2078, clarifying that public notice for new aggregate mine reclamation plans applies only to new plans and can be satisfied by certain local notices, also passed 9-1 after testimony from the sponsor and mining industry representatives. HCM 2009, urging Congress to amend the Antiquities Act, address split estate mineral rights, and streamline mining permits, passed 5-4 along party lines and drew support from mining interests and opposition from members concerned about federal land protection and monuments. HCR 2038, supporting a seven-state Colorado River agreement, passed 9-1 with testimony emphasizing the importance of a negotiated river settlement to Arizona’s economy, food supply, and national security. The committee then took up a series of water-management bills that generated more extensive debate. HB 2026, which narrows how ADWR evaluates water availability by focusing on proposed dedicated supplies even if commingled in delivery systems, passed 6-4 despite concerns that it echoed previously vetoed language and could weaken water security. HB 2027, as amended, would limit application of Pinal AMA-style rules in the Phoenix AMA and alter physical-availability review for applicants enrolled in the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District; it passed 6-4 after strong opposition from CAP, municipal water users, and ADWR, who warned it could undermine assured water supply designations and CAGRD obligations, while home builders argued it was a fairness issue for development. HB 2028, removing ADWR’s exemption from appealable administrative-completeness determinations, passed 6-4 over agency concerns that it would turn deficiency letters into formal appeals and add workload, while supporters said it would give applicants the same legal rights as other regulated parties. The committee also approved HB 2031, an emergency measure setting a deadline for filing grandfathered groundwater rights in the Wilcox AMA, on a 5-4 vote, and HB 2094, which would require ADWR to re-review certain assured water supply determinations and retroactively validate some applications using specified models, also on a 5-4 vote; both were described as similar to previously vetoed measures. The transcript ends as the committee begins HB 2095, which would expand the factors ADWR considers in determining groundwater depth and physical availability for assured water supply applications, with an amendment being explained but no final action captured in the excerpt.