Video & Transcript Research : 'contested case hearing'

Page 3 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety REVISED Feb 24th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • The same process as is currently the case with nonmedical parole cases.
  • So that would be part of that file that's parole board would look at for this case, as is the case with
  • any case that they get.
  • I think that would be a case-by-case basis that I don't think would be fair for me to make a blanket
  • I'm sorry, I couldn't hear the question.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2025-04-02

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'd like to call to order this hearing of the Judiciary, Finance and Civil Law Committee today.
  • That's how these cases should be venued, and we believe that in this case there should be similar provisions
  • So I hear you on that. I don't know.
  • I'm making it through a hearing relatively speedily, which is great.
  • proceeds to the administrative contested case process.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 4/2/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • proceeds through the administrative contested case process.
  • is issued and a case proceeds through the<01:17:17.280> administrative<01:17:17.920> contested
  • <01:17:18.400> case the administrative contested case the administrative contested case process
  • <01:17:27.040> case<01:17:27.360> process by the time the contested case process by
  • the time the contested case process were<01:17:28.000> complete,<01:17:28.880> uh<01:17
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee Apr 16th, 2025

Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • And it only applies in civil cases.
  • Um, you know, that would have to really be part of a case presented to a grand jury in determination.
  • Criminal cases could likely take...
  • I've seen cases that have lasted a year or two, but typically not longer than that. lasted a year or
  • In our court system, they take years, especially on cases like this.
Bills: HB411, HB559
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • case management.
  • case managers.
  • my case manager.
  • For example, in case management, did you know you can have two case managers?
  • contracted case managers, families. contracted case managers, families.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • back into session for the hearing for Dr.
  • This is the hearing for Dr. Oz to be the...
  • It is, I have to say, a refreshing moment to hear hear somebody in the Finance Committee hearing room
  • That's not the case.
  • Here that's not the case.
Summary: The committee convened to discuss critical issues surrounding the nomination of Michael Falkender for the position of Deputy Secretary of the Treasury. This meeting included a series of remarks from committee members who expressed divergent views on Falkender's qualifications and the implications of his appointment. Senator Wyden voiced strong opposition, arguing that Falkender represents harmful policies expected to be perpetuated under the current administration, especially concerning taxpayer privacy and IRS tactics. Meanwhile, other members defended Falkender, noting his extensive experience, including a commitment to transparency in government operations if confirmed.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 4/15/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is the case management working group.
  • cases involving the state.
  • waiver case management. waiver case management.
  • cases involving the state.
  • which they do in our cases. which they do in our cases.
Bills: HF4207, HF4338
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • And I hope to hear about their experience with your business as well. Thank you.
  • Chairman and thank you so much for holding this critical hearing today.
  • Thank you for inviting us to join you today for this hearing.
  • Thank you. this joint hearing today on such a critical issue.
  • We are almost ready to close our hearing. I want to thank everybody.
Summary: In this joint hearing of the House Committee on Small Business and the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, the primary focus was on the importance of making the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) permanent. The chair emphasized that small businesses are crucial for the nation's economic recovery, especially in the wake of current federal policies perceived as detrimental. Witnesses shared their experiences and highlighted how the tax cuts facilitated job creation and business expansion, stressing the need for continued support through ongoing tax relief measures. The meeting included discussions about the economic implications of the TCJA's potential expiration, with members voicing their concerns regarding how this could impact small businesses and the broader economy.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • And in three hearings, or two hearings, I've only had one person abuse that.
  • Jack Smith's lawfare cases.
  • That doesn't mean every case should go federal. To the contrary, most cases should not.
  • That working group is gonna look at the January 6th cases and the Mar-a-Lago case, the cases you worked
  • , the Mar-a-Lago case, and the Alvin Bragg case?
Summary: The meeting focused on the nominations of Todd Blanch and Gail Slater for the positions of Deputy Attorney General and Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, respectively. The committee considered the qualifications of both nominees, with opening statements provided by the nominees themselves. There was an evident emphasis on the rigorous vetting process that nominees undergo before their selection, highlighting the importance of the roles within the Department of Justice. Members of the committee engaged in a structured question-and-answer session to further evaluate the nominees' capabilities and fit for the positions they were nominated for, with each member allotted seven minutes to pose questions.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • What can you tell us about your involvement in that case and what your involvement in that case sort
  • In a way that goes beyond the parties to the case, but applies nationwide or in some cases universally
  • case.
  • from him in some committee hearings sometime soon, too.
  • With that, this hearing is adjourned. Thank you.
Summary: The committee meeting primarily involved discussions around key nominations and pressing legal issues pertaining to the Department of Justice. Notable discussions included the nomination of John Eisenberg for assistant attorney general for national security, where concerns over the revival of the China Initiative were raised. Senators expressed significant apprehensions regarding previous actions taken under this initiative and its implications for national security. Additionally, there were critiques of the broader implications of executive actions that challenge judicial authority, aligning with ongoing dialogues about the integrity of the judiciary and executive oversight.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Welcome to the Senate Intelligence Committee Annual Worldwide Threats Hearing.
  • Attorney to throw the book at the person disrupting. the hearing.
  • That was not the case.
  • Because of the nature of this hearing? Because of the nature.
  • The hearing is adjourned.
Summary: The Senate Intelligence Committee convened for a significant meeting focused on the Annual Worldwide Threats Hearing. Prominent officials from various intelligence agencies presented their insights on emerging national security threats, including concerns over increasing cyber threats, particularly from China and non-state actors. A major discussion point included the balance between national security and civil liberties, as evidenced by conversations surrounding Section 702 of FISA and its implications for privacy protection. The challenges posed by cartels and transnational criminal organizations, especially related to narcotics trafficking, were emphasized as pressing issues necessitating coordinated responses from federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. This meeting underscored the necessity of public-private partnerships to tackle these multifaceted threats effectively.