Video & Transcript Research : 'candidate ethics'

Page 3 of 268
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please bring them ethics committee.
  • They just think it's one candidate banging the head of another candidate when they look at it.
  • the head of it's one candidate banging the head of another<01:39:40.000> candidate<01:39:40.480
  • another candidate when they look at it. another candidate when they look at it.
  • to don't support or oppose a candidate to don't support or oppose a candidate or<01:42:13.840>
Bills: HF4133, HF3419
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • While a candidate is not allowed to advance, there has been a scenario where an ineligible candidate
  • He cannot be the candidate. in November when you file for tea parties.
  • And It cost the candidates a huge amount of money.
  • We need to stop blaming the candidates for runoffs. We are responsible for that.
  • If a candidate is willing to meet all legal requirements, such as paying filing fees, which this candidate
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Paul Parker, our candidate representative for a school board candidate, arrived at the election department
  • With respect to elections, I've been a a candidate, an election watcher, and a statistical analyst.
  • They provide for and enable candidates, voters, and election officials. to detect and prevent fraud.
  • A person may have an ethical stance.
  • There are many reasons to support this legislation, including ethical and practical concerns.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JDC Public Hearing 02-06-2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • "Morning again." publish any responses provided by a publish any responses provided by a candidate<00
  • on its website and in a candidate on its website and in a digital<00:22:35.840> digital<00:22
  • Because you're already—there's already a candidate statement that they're allowed to make. Correct.
  • issues to which candidates may respond. issues to which candidates may respond.
  • or you were a candidate. or you were a candidate.
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on several bills. SB 2444 would raise the real property exemption amount for attachment or execution, which the Attorney General said could create vague retroactivity language and litigation risk; the committee noted the exemption had last been adjusted around 1978. SB 2446 would add a seventh associate judge to the Intermediate Court of Appeals. Judiciary staff testified in opposition, saying recent internal restructuring and a pending vacancy had improved output and that it would be prudent to wait and see the effect before adding another judge. The Public Defender supported the goal of faster appellate resolution but said it would defer to the court’s assessment and had no objection to revisiting the issue later. The committee also discussed current appellate timelines, with staff saying at least 225 days is built into the process before a case reaches a merit panel, and that a two-year delay from panel assignment was realistic under the current structure. The committee then heard SB 2450, which would establish a presidential preference primary for the 2028 cycle. The Chief Election Officer said the election would cost about $4 million, less if combined with the regular primary. Several opponents argued the bill would add bureaucracy, duplicate or undermine party-run processes, and waste taxpayer money; one speaker estimated the total cost could be closer to $6 million when county costs are included. Supporters and committee members discussed that the measure would not require parties to use the results and that Hawaii remains one of the few states still using caucuses. The committee also asked whether counties could staff the election and whether the results would be useful given Hawaii’s current primary timing. SB 2453 would require the Office of Elections to include a notice with each ballot that a digital and printed voter information guide is available, with the notice in 32-point font as a separate insert. The Chief Election Officer said the insert would cost about $90,000 and asked for an effective date of January 1, 2027 because mailing preparations for the primary would already be underway. The Disability and Communications Access Board, League of Women Voters, National Federation of the Blind of Hawaii, and others supported the bill. The committee also began hearing SB 2461, which would have the Office of Elections prepare a questionnaire for candidates and publish responses online and in the voter guide; the Chief Election Officer said the office did not think it should be the agency to shape campaign questions, though he said it could work if the questions were specified in statute. Finally, the committee heard SB 2457, which would require a criminal conviction before seized property could be forfeited. The Attorney General and Honolulu Police Department opposed the bill, arguing it would prolong cases, increase storage costs, and make forfeiture less effective against crime, especially where owners flee, die, or hide assets through shell companies. The Public Defender strongly supported the measure, saying forfeiture should be tied to convictions and that people challenging forfeiture often lack counsel. The Honolulu Prosecutor also opposed the bill, but said it supported transparency, due process, and even a right to counsel; it argued conviction-only forfeiture would fail in cases involving fugitives, deceased suspects, or hidden ownership structures. The committee questioned what would happen to property if an owner could not be found, and the prosecutor said the outcome would depend on the type of property and could involve abandonment or interpleader proceedings.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/3/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • would require uh legislative candidates would require uh legislative candidates to<00:42:00.920>
  • is an oral amendment on line 1.21 of the DE1 to delete the phrase “area to be represented by the candidate
  • :50:58.240> the phrase area to be represented by the phrase area to be represented by the candidate
  • and insert state so so the candidate and insert state so so the effect<00:51:02.240> of<00:51
  • <00:59:07.039> um<00:59:07.319> 80% candidate um 80% candidate um 80% were<00:59:10.160
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Elections Aug 25th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • So then why are we bypassing the Texas Ethics Commission instead of using the existing Title 15 framework
  • What do you, why, why do you say it's bypassing the ethics commissions.
  • far as making a determination whether there was a violation of this proposed statute, but the Texas Ethics
  • But if members misuse campaign funds that belongs within the Texas Ethics Commission, not the courts.
  • Not only did the quorum breaking really affect me because I'm a candidate for United States Congress,
Bills: HB18
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/26

State Government Finance and Policy

TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Aug 25th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • What do you, why do you say it's bypassing the Ethics Commission?
  • Because we're taking the punishment mechanism out of the Texas Ethics Commission and we're moving it
  • I mean, the bill references the per diem amount that's established by the Ethics Commission, and so.
  • But if members misuse campaign funds, that belongs with the Texas Ethics Commission, not the courts.
  • Not only did the quorum breaking really affect me because I'm a candidate for United States Congress,
Bills: HB18
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JDC Public Hearing 02-10-2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • or non-candidate committees, candidates, or any person for any political purposes for the duration of
  • Harris on behalf of the Y State Ethics Harris on behalf of the Y State Ethics Commission.<00:01:
  • <00:03:20.480> or contributing to candidate or contributing to candidate or non-candidate<
  • committee candidates, I'm non-candidate committee candidates, I'm sorry,<00:03:23.280> non-candidate
  • a candidate to me is um overreaching. a candidate to me is um overreaching.
Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on several bills. SB 2248 would expand financial disclosure requirements to certain gubernatorial nominees subject to Senate confirmation. The State Ethics Commission supported the measure, saying disclosures should be filed before confirmation so the public and interested parties can review them in advance. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support, with 22 supporters, no opposition, and one comment. SB 2530 would broaden Hawaii’s campaign contribution ban for state and county contractors to include officers and immediate family members, and would extend the ban to certain grantees and their officers and family members, with specified contract thresholds. The Campaign Spending Commission said the bill is its own proposal and would align the thresholds with procurement guidelines. Testimony was entirely favorable, with 30 in support, no opposition, and two comments. Members asked about conforming amendments and how the existing prohibition on soliciting contributions applies; CSC said the calendar-day language clarifies current practice and that the solicitation ban already applies to contractors, with the bill extending the same standard to officers and immediate family members. SB 2732 would require courts to consider a defendant’s ability to pay when setting bail, including excluding public benefits from income calculations and clarifying the 40-hour affordability benchmark for those above 150% of the federal poverty level. The Office of the Public Defender, the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission, and the ACLU of Hawaii supported the bill, arguing that unaffordable bail creates wealth-based disparities, contributes to jail overcrowding, and can cause severe collateral consequences for people not yet convicted. There was one opposition testimony and 18 supporters. Committee discussion focused on when the 40-hour period should begin, how income would be verified, and whether misrepresentation could affect bail; the Public Defender said the measure should be read to start from initial appearance and that judges could address false statements through existing remedies. SB 2871 would prohibit discrimination based on perceived characteristics, association with someone who has or is perceived to have protected characteristics, and intersectional combinations of characteristics. The Department of Education supported the intent but asked for clear definitions, while the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission said the bill does not add new protected classes and simply codifies the Lamb v. University of Hawaii decision on intersectional discrimination. LGBTQ+, civil rights, ACLU, and other advocacy groups testified in support, with one opposition testimony and a total of 27 in support, two opposed, and one comment. The committee then heard SB 2919, which appropriates funds for one full-time public deputy public defender position. The Public Defender’s Office said the position would provide statewide legal support and a centralized resource on constitutional, appellate, and immigration-related issues; several advocacy groups supported the measure, and committee questions focused on how the new position would complement existing training and keep staff updated on changing law.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Feb 24th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The $1.8 million lottery game amounted to the first crack in the Texas Lottery Ethical Foundation. to
  • It's going to show us how we can put into law ethics, integrity, and responsibility. in the bill and
  • The Texas Ethics Commission Rule 12.23 clearly bypasses the intent and the letter of the law that the
  • We do have a resource witness from the Ethics Commission if we need to.
  • Senator Byrd will you have any questions for the Ethics Commission on this?
Summary: The meeting was a crucial session for discussing several important bills including SB992, which aims to establish a clear time frame for the Attorney General's approval on outside legal counsel for state agencies. Senator Nichols presented the bill, emphasizing its necessity for timely responses to ensure efficient legal processing. Another notable discussion centered around SB523, which seeks to allow parole and probation officers to use a business address on their driver's licenses for safety and security purposes. This bill passed favorably out of the committee, with public testimony supporting the need for such provisions due to the risks these officers face.