Video & Transcript Research : 'bond cap'

Page 3 of 424
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Mar 3rd, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, contractors on public works projects must take out surety bonds, including payment
  • bonds and performance bonds, for contracts in excess of certain sums of money in order to mitigate risk
  • Current state law requires payment bonds for contracts in excess of $25,000 and performance bonds for
  • Performance bonds guarantee that a contractor will complete a project according to the terms outlined
  • bonds from $100,000 to $150,000.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

HOU Public Hearing 01-27-2026

Housing

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, if a home buyer wanted to sell their unit in three years, they could, but their price would be capped
  • >> I don't know if they're not requesting any funding, but we're removing the cap of the funding, right
  • <00:42:49.119> we're<00:42:49.359> removing<00:42:49.680> the<00:42:49.920> cap
  • any funding, but we're removing the cap any funding, but we're removing the cap of<00:42:51.119>
Summary: The committee heard five housing measures, with the chair announcing that SB 2060, SB 2063, SB 2062, and SB 2069 were works in progress and that decision-making would be deferred to February 3. SB 2060 would allow HHFDC, with Finance approval, to transfer money within the rental housing revolving fund and its subaccounts without further legislative authorization, including a transfer to the mixed-income subaccount for FY 2026-2027. HHFDC and other supporters said the change would give the agency more flexibility to move projects forward, while Catholic Charities Hawaii and a testifier from Roars and Cares supported the bill but warned that shifting money away from lower-income housing could weaken efforts to serve households under 80% of area median income and people at risk of homelessness. HHFDC said the fund’s uncommitted balance was about $100 million and that demand exceeded available resources. SB 2063 would revise the mixed-income subaccount by changing project priorities, adding new criteria, allowing transfers within the subaccount without legislative approval, and directing conveyance tax revenues into the subaccount. HHFDC, OPSD, LURF, Hawaii Appleseed, Housing Hawaii’s Future, Stanford Carr Development, and Roars and Cares supported the measure, while Catholic Charities urged the committee to keep rental and for-sale housing policy separate and to use other mechanisms for homeownership. Catholic Charities said the rental housing revolving fund should remain focused on rentals, and that for-sale initiatives should be addressed separately. The chair indicated an intent to defer the bill for further edits. SB 2062 would make the dwelling unit revolving fund equity pilot a permanent HHFDC program, allowing the agency to buy equity in for-sale developments to lower initial purchase prices and require repayment through shared appreciation. HHFDC said the pilot had been successful, with 83 units committed and $7.6 million of the $10 million program cap already committed, and said permanence would let the agency pair the program with DERF loans earlier in project financing. The chair said SB 2069 would be used as the vehicle for amendments to the DERF equity program and related changes. SB 2069 would authorize HHFDC to use existing dwelling unit revolving fund balances for the equity pilot; it drew support from HHFDC and several housing organizations. SB 2070 would create a permanently affordable for-sale housing program by replacing the current 10-year buyback restriction with a resale price cap tied to an appreciation index, which HHFDC said would preserve affordability while allowing owners to build equity. In questioning, senators pressed HHFDC on whether the bill was necessary, whether it would remove first-time homebuyer and other ownership restrictions, and whether the new program was truly “permanently affordable” if not tied to AMI. HHFDC said the current statutory restrictions limit flexibility, that the proposal would expand access to local residents, and that the price cap would be based on about 4.5% annual appreciation. Supporters said the approach would help buyers move up the housing ladder, while some senators expressed concern that it could open the program to owners of multiple properties and that the committee should see sales-velocity data on existing restricted units before proceeding.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/7/26

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • your bonding tour visiting Woodbury. your bonding tour visiting Woodbury.
  • It doesn't just come up in bonding.
  • It doesn't just come up in bonding.
  • It doesn't just come up in bonding.
  • It doesn't just come up in bonding.
TX

Texas 89th 1st C.S.

Local Government Aug 1st, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the cap is 20,000 above that.
  • that sales tax to pay off all the bonds and not borrow anymore.
  • Let me get this straight, because it's not a revenue cap.
  • So if your voters approved a bond, the state law allows you to collect taxes to pay off those bonds.
  • It's not a hard cap.
Bills: SB9
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met to hear Senate Bill 9, which would lower the voter-approval tax rate for certain local taxing units from 3.5% to 2.5%. Sen. Bettencourt, the bill author, argued the change would continue the state’s property tax reforms begun in 2019, slow local levy growth, and give voters more say over larger tax increases. He and supporters cited data showing property tax levies have grown faster than population plus inflation, and said the bill would help protect taxpayers while preserving the state’s broader investments in school tax relief, water, rural law enforcement, and ambulance funding. Supporters included the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, the Texas Association of Business, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the Texas Association of Manufacturers. They said the bill would improve transparency, encourage more disciplined budgeting, and create certainty for homeowners and businesses. They argued that lower tax-rate growth would help attract and retain employers and investment, and that voters would still be able to approve higher rates when needed. Local officials and other opponents said the bill would constrain cities and counties facing rapid growth, inflation, infrastructure needs, and public safety costs. Testimony from county judges, city finance officials, firefighters, and urban county representatives emphasized pressures from jail operations, roads, water, EMS, police and fire staffing, and unfunded mandates. Several witnesses asked for carve-outs or exemptions for public safety and disaster-related costs, warning that a one-size-fits-all cap could force service cuts or shift costs elsewhere. The committee heard extensive questioning but no final vote or disposition on the bill was taken in the portion provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 16th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Guillen relating to public utility agencies providing authority to issue bills. ...bonds
  • This maximum civil penalty cap, which has not been increased by the legislature in almost a quarter of
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's capped.
  • I don't have tax credits, bonds.
  • And there was no bonds, there was no tax credits.
  • These bonds are already used for seaports and airports.
  • They make determinations regarding bonds and the issuance of bonds and all those types of things that
Bills: HB21, HB211, HB223
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/10/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Transcript Highlights:
  • putting in pipes, and building infrastructure, primarily understanding that we were going to lose our CAP
  • keep that water or that tax for another three years in order to get them to 2030. 2030 was when the CAP
  • You might know that the CAP operates the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District.
  • We have some serious concerns as to why, at this time, there's so much unknown about the CAP and our
  • cities with CAP water to get designated.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Cap Committee Meeting - 2025-04-23

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • General obligation bonds keep us in compliance with the state constitution.
  • The bonding tours have been down there in the past.
  • Bonding funds would be used to build out a five-acre.
  • There are bonds that need to be deceased for 1.3 million dollars.
  • This bill was already introduced and included in the bonding bill last biennium.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/23/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • present House File 3125, a bonding present House File 3125, a bonding request<00:10:36.640> for
  • They bonding tours have been down there in the past.
  • They bonding tours have been down there in the past.
  • With that, I'll turn bonding request.
  • <01:16:12.800> bill relate to this um budget or bonding bill relate to this um budget or bonding
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services May 19th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • General obligation bonds can be used for three things: the specific purpose for which the bond was marketed
  • of the original bond.
  • That it would "repurpose" bond funds from the district's 2018 bond program.
  • A little bit quicker, and that's why we see the next bond election, you know, a no tax increase bond
  • Tara, did the Houston bond issue pass? It did not. Thank you. Who put the bond issue to the voters?
Bills: SB414, SB621, SB2395
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Commerce and Economic Development Oversight Apr 14th, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Commerce & Economic Development Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 378 modernizes the Oklahoma multi-county bond bail has been statute by controlling flexibility
  • Senate Bill 378 modernizes the Oklahoma multi-county bond bail bonds statute by controlling flexibility
  • This is not 12 times the amount that somebody arrested has to put up to bond out.
  • That somebody arrested has to put up to bond out, this is the bondsman.
  • And there is a bond necessary for the that is commensurate with the level of the crime.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/16/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now you remove the cap, then you put in a new cap, or is it just unlimited?
  • then you put in a now you remove the cap then you put in a new<00:58:59.960> cap new cap new
  • <01:01:24.720> Uh there's no cap to this. Uh there's no cap to this.
  • The to the bond repayment limited.
  • How does that fit within the kind of cap How does that fit within the kind of cap that<01:44:58.560><
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 378 modernizes Oklahoma's multicounty bail bonds and statute by controlled flexibility and
  • guardrails and enhancing oversight and transparency, and preventing disruption to courts and outstanding bonds
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Mar 17th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • bond in lieu of that.
  • You mentioned performance bonds. I mean, clearly cash bonds are...
  • up to a $1,000,000 bond.
  • And if the company decides the bond shouldn't be used, the bond should be used.
  • bond for that purpose, you have to... give that bond back, it may leave the problem that the bond was
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Transportation and Energy Committee Apr 2nd, 2026

Transportation and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We put a cap of road or bridge projects.
  • The cap on this to give to the other.
  • And there is a cap. There's a $500,000 cap per project over the 250. There is no cap under the 250.
  • And there is a cap. There's a $500,000 cap per project over the 250. There is no cap under the 250.
  • And there is a cap. There's a $500,000 cap per project over the 250. There is no cap under the 250.
Bills: HB542
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Of a proposition for the issuance of general obligation bonds to voters, law requires 60% of the governing
  • Taxpayers raised concerns that tax units re-propose bond propositions and...
  • Obligation proposition requiring 80% of the governing body's union to propose a general obligation bond
  • 2529 to increase the hurdle that governing bodies need for approval of issuing general obligation bonds
  • legislature's... ...responsibility, but they've decided they're going to put their own type of appraisal caps