Video & Transcript Research : 'absentee voting'

Page 3 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 15th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • event, including early voting, mail-in voting, and in-person voting.
  • You need to have the whole state go to countywide voting or early voting.
  • Number ten, the ballots voted...
  • Vote in 15 days, you probably weren't going to vote anyway. Thanks. Thank you, sir.
  • , all early votes twice.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • voting system is a ballot Vote universal voting system is a ballot marking<00:51:15.680> device
  • Vote.
  • The Express Vote like the Express Vote.
  • >> their vote? Okay. >> their vote? Okay.
  • We go through the opening, the voting, and closing of the voting equipment.
Summary: The committee met to approve the October 21 minutes and then took up BR 25 for the 2026 regular session, a proposal relating to prohibited uses of tax dollars and public resources. The sponsors said the bill is intended to strengthen existing law by adding civil and criminal penalties for taxpayer-funded advocacy on ballot questions, especially in light of controversies during the 2024 election over school officials and districts using public resources to oppose a constitutional amendment. They also described related concerns about school districts hiring third-party lobbyists and public relations firms, particularly in Fayette County, and said the proposal was meant to keep tax dollars focused on public services rather than political persuasion. Committee members raised several concerns about scope and drafting. Some asked whether the bill should specifically mention schools, school boards, and school employees, and the sponsors said they would add that language. Others questioned whether the measure would also affect local government lobbying through groups like KLC and KCO, and the sponsors said they intended to focus narrowly on schools while exempting certain advocacy organizations and internal government lobbyists. Members also asked whether public employees could still speak as private individuals, and the sponsors said yes. Several members suggested splitting the lobbying and ballot-advocacy issues into separate bills, and the sponsors said they would consider that. Members also pressed for clarification on how the bill would apply in practice, including whether it would cover legal challenges to petition drives or only advocacy after a question is on the ballot. Counsel for the sponsors said the bill would not cover some petition-related litigation as drafted, though they believed it should. The sponsors and supporters argued the proposal was needed to give the existing prohibition real enforcement, while some members warned that the language could unintentionally limit legitimate public representation or be too broad if not carefully drafted. No final vote was taken during the discussion.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • It shouldn't happen for people saying vote no. It shouldn't happen for people saying vote yes.
  • Express Vote like the Express Vote, the Express Vote ballot<00:53:04.319> card.
  • Where all do these votes configuration? Where all do these votes go<01:01:39.520> to?
  • But there are so many other aspects to a secure voting system and voting ecosystem.
  • system and voting secure voting system and voting ecosystem. ecosystem. ecosystem.
Summary: The committee met, approved the October 21 minutes, and then took up BR 25 for the 2026 regular session, a proposal to prohibit the use of tax dollars and public resources to advocate for or against ballot questions, including constitutional amendments. Senator Rawlings and the other presenters argued the current law already bars such advocacy but lacks meaningful enforcement, citing the 2024 school choice amendment campaign and other examples where public officials and school systems allegedly used taxpayer-funded resources to influence voters. They said the bill would add civil and criminal penalties, while preserving First Amendment rights for public employees acting in their personal capacities. Much of the discussion focused on whether the bill should be limited to school districts or broadened to cover other public entities, and on how to define terms such as “advocating in impartial terms.” Members raised concerns about possible effects on county and city lobbying through groups like KLC and KCO, on legitimate factual explanations by public officials, and on whether the bill could unintentionally restrict needed representation for local governments. The sponsors said the measure was intended to be narrow, would be vetted further, and would not bar individuals from speaking on their own behalf. Several members suggested revisions. Representative Lockett asked that schools and school employees be specifically named, and suggested separating the lobbying restrictions from the ballot-measure provisions into different bills. Representative Layman questioned the meaning of the bill’s language and whether it would cover factual testimony by officials. Representative Heen asked about a Jefferson County example involving legal fees used to challenge petition signatures; counsel said that situation would likely be allowable under the bill as drafted, though some members thought it should be covered. No final vote was taken on BR 25 during this discussion.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Roberts votes ai. Representative Guy votes iii. Leer Munson votes i.
  • Chairman Cadwellrey votes ii. Representative Townley votes i.
  • Representative De votes 'aye'. Representative Rowe votes 'aye'. Representative Chapman votes 'aye'.
  • Proto more votes 'aye'. Representative Doriinsky votes 'aye'. Representative Miller votes 'aye'.
  • Resin, iller, otai, Representative Sneed, he care to vote Members wishing to vote to change their vote
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • voting locations.
  • They will get to vote no. And then there won't be precinct voting.
  • Well, we're in the vote. We'll cover it up for a vote. Representative Hernandez?
  • voting or whether they want to allow use of the vote center model.
  • With your vote of...
Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 2348, which would appropriate state general fund money in FY 2027 for Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs projects including wireless networking at training centers, a reimbursement program for service members without government computers, lodging and kind for service members, and HVAC upgrades and maintenance. Two amendments were considered: the Marquez Amendment, which filled in dollar amounts for the appropriations, failed; and the Gillette Amendment, which restricted certain networking equipment for national security reasons, removed the reimbursement program, revised the lodging language, and tied some funding intentions to compliance, passed. After extensive testimony from the sponsor and several Army Reserve and National Guard witnesses about lack of Wi-Fi, inadequate lodging, safety concerns from long drives, and poor HVAC at joint facilities, the committee approved HB 2348 as amended on a 4-3 vote. The committee then considered HCR 2016, a ballot referral that would cap precinct size at 2,500 voters and eliminate county authority to use vote centers, emergency voting centers, and certain on-site early voting options. The sponsor said the measure was intended to restore precinct-based voting and let voters decide. County officials and election advocates opposed it, arguing that vote centers and early voting provide flexibility, are more cost-effective in many counties, and are necessary where geography, staffing, and facility availability make precinct voting difficult. After debate over local control, voter choice, and the practicality of precincting, the committee gave HCR 2016 a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 2165, which exempts veterans from Arizona State Parks admission fees, and adopted the Marquez Amendment to extend the exemption to active military members, National Guard members, and reserve-unit members, with alternative ID options. Arizona State Parks testified in neutral, saying it supports veterans but is concerned about revenue losses; it estimated that even a modest share of veteran visits could reduce revenue by about $1.8 million annually. The sponsor said the bill was prompted by constituent requests and was meant to help veterans enjoy outdoor recreation and therapeutic opportunities. The committee then approved HB 2165 as amended on a vote of 4-0, with some members absent or not voting.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Voting is a personal responsibility for civil committed individuals.
  • <00:45:52.319> rights equal access to their voting rights equal access to their voting rights
  • district representative race, which was elected by just over 400 votes.
  • If those civil committed were to cooperate on their votes and vote together, the results would have come
  • > the on their votes and vote together the on their votes and vote together the results<00:47:04.559
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions, February 18, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

Transcript Highlights:
  • , but would be prevented from voting in the upcoming election.
  • , but would be prevented from to vote, but would be prevented from voting<00:03:04.000> in<00:
  • <00:03:06.400> uh voting in the upcoming election. uh voting in the upcoming election. uh
  • In election at which they offer to vote.
  • voting uh in that 14-day lockout period. voting uh in that 14-day lockout period.
Bills: SF0114, SF0102, SF0117
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Hunter voting. I'm Mr. Harris voting aye. Ms. McQueenie voting aye. So Mr. King voting aye.
  • Show the speaker voting aye. Lopez voting aye. Toth voting aye. Swanson voting aye.
  • Have all members voted? Strassler voting aye. Corwin voting aye. King voting aye.
  • Dutton voting no, Zwiener voting no, Oliverson voting aye, Asseep voting aye.
  • Hunter voting aye, Mr. Dutton voting aye, Mr. Basu voting aye, Mr. King voting aye.
Bills: HB4, HB 4
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Congressional Redistricting, Select Aug 1st, 2025

Congressional Redistricting, Select

Transcript Highlights:
  • OK, and did you vote for this plan? No, I did not vote for this plan.
  • People vote for whoever they want to vote for.
  • God bless them for who they vote for, but they get to vote for who they want to vote for.
  • Your vote, but we want to ensure that your vote doesn't count when you do vote.
  • It is about the people's vote. It's what they voted for. It's what this country voted for.
Bills: HB4
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 20th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • first filed the bill, it also did not allow committee chairs and committees to subpoena, required a vote
  • Because the bill would be unconstitutional, I respectfully ask that the committee vote against the bill
  • note that that bill, which completed the important simplification work, squeaked by the Senate by a vote
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs met and heard several bills related to legislative process and court jurisdiction. Senate Bill 1386, by Senator Huffman, would change compelled legislative testimony from blanket transactional immunity to testimonial immunity, allowing compelled statements or documents to be used against a witness in criminal prosecution only if not derived from the compelled testimony, while preserving protection against perjury and false statements and retaining the right to counsel. No public witnesses testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1470, by Chairman Hughes, which would require DPS to share existing data on cross-state driver’s license cancellations with the Secretary of State for voter-roll maintenance. Hughes said the bill does not create new data collection and is intended to improve list maintenance. A DPS resource witness was present, there was no substantive opposition, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1210, also by Hughes, would address conflicts between the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals on constitutional questions by making the Supreme Court the final arbiter in limited circumstances. Chris Hilton supported the bill, but Allen Place, Jack Rohde, and Philip Furlow opposed it, arguing it was unconstitutional, unnecessary, and could create practical problems in criminal post-conviction litigation. The bill was left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 311, which would conform the Government Code to the Texas Constitution by clarifying the Supreme Court’s original writ authority against lower courts and officials other than the governor. Justice Evan Young and Chris Hilton supported the bill as a clarification of existing authority, while no one testified against it; the bill was left pending. The committee then recessed to allow the chamber to rearrange for the Senate session.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate and Governmental Affairs May 12th, 2026

Senate & Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • and absentee voting information can be found on the Secretary of State's website at the conclusion of
  • Prior to early voting starting on May 2, 2026, 131,346 absentee ballots had been requested and sent out
  • Once early voting started, the number of absentee ballots received each day was included in the early
  • Early voting, absentee, and election day votes are counted on election day.
  • Early voting, absentee, and election day votes are counted on election day."
Bills: SB116, SB121, SB130, SB407
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate and Governmental Affairs May 8th, 2026

Senate & Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • For everyone here, we don't plan on voting on any bills today.
  • For everyone here, we don't plan on voting on any bills today.
  • Nobody has come to me and said that they voted. So I don't know.
  • Can you tell me that the votes that have been cast for the congressional elections, are those votes going
  • are those votes going to be discarded?
Bills: SB116, SB121, SB130, SB407
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • to vote.
  • voting.
  • voting.
  • Whether it is 24-hour voting, drive-thru voting, or mass mailers of absentee. ballot request forms, some
  • voting or do you do countywide voting?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • filed the bill it also did not allow committee chairs to to, and committees to, subpoena required a vote
  • Because the bill would... be unconstitutional, I respectfully ask that the committee vote against the
  • I might note that that bill, which completed the important by the Senate by a vote of 31 to 0, and that