Transcript Highlights:

• Athar Hasibullah of the Nevada ACLU is also here.
• For the record, Athar Hasibullah, ACLU of Nevada.
• In Nevada, all Nevada voters deserve to be able to take part in our democracy safely and without intimidation
• For the record, Athar Hasibullah, ACLU of Nevada.
• For the record, Atara, I see Boulet, ACLU of Nevada.

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There's a new phone number that we have here at the Nevada Legislature.
• the Nevada Legislature, where I won the Outstanding Intern Award in 2013.
• First, there is no algorithmic switching of votes in Nevada or anywhere else in the country.
• There has never been widespread voter fraud in the state of Nevada or across the country.
• So education and elections are the places that Nevada is not doing very well.

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Assemblymember Gray went with us as well, and I brought a photo to show you where we presented the Nevada
• This is a no-cost opportunity for the state of Nevada.
• In work session before the committee today, it's Assembly Bill 160, which creates the Nevada Ireland
• Housing Authority and Rural Nevada Housing Authority.
• Rural Nevada Housing Authority.

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do we know what the number of Nevada Gold Star spouses are in Nevada that would be beneficiaries of this
• There's no actual ability to reach the transaction until a consumer gets by from the state of Nevada,
• Here in Nevada, Here in Nevada, we have worked with the department for the past two sessions.
• I don't have those numbers off the top of my head for Nevada.
• Hopefully, when we draft these—and I will say this year in Nevada, it absolutely has been.

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So we'll first be taking a peek at Nevada.
• And there's just a few facts on the right-hand side of this slide about Nevada.
• For structural changes in Nevada, as I mentioned, they also meet biennially.
• And Nevada utilizes bill draft request limits for both... ...type work.
• Unlike Nevada, orientation is not required, but it is encouraged by leaders.

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The Legislative Procedure and Arrangements Committee met with a quorum, approved the previous meeting minutes, and heard an update from Garty Consulting on the interim study of legislative term limits. The consultants outlined their research plan and preliminary themes, including loss of institutional knowledge, shifts in power toward executive agencies and lobbyists, reduced long-term policy capacity, faster leadership turnover, and recruitment/support challenges. They also described possible recommendation categories ranging from constitutional and statutory changes to procedural and cultural adjustments. Committee members asked about how other states repealed term limits, how the public survey would address perceptions of term limits, and how stakeholder focus groups would be selected. The committee also heard a presentation from NCSL on term limits in other states, including examples from Nevada, Montana, and Colorado, with discussion of training programs, staffing changes, annual-session debates, bill limits, and impacts on decorum and leadership continuity. Several members requested follow-up data on part-time versus full-time legislatures, taxpayer costs, and nonpartisan staff devoted to oversight. The committee then considered revisions to the legislature’s workplace harassment policy and related forms. Legislative Council explained changes that clarified the definition of harassment, added captions for readability, extended several deadlines, allowed informal resolution before a review panel is appointed, clarified the role of Legislative Council in intake and documentation, and updated confidentiality/open-records language. Members, especially Senator Hogan, said the revisions better formalize the role of counsel and provide a less intimidating path for resolving complaints. The committee adopted the revised policy and forms by roll call vote. Finally, the committee approved a motion to enter executive session at 1:00 p.m. to review the results of a capital threat assessment and discuss legislator security, citing the applicable open-meetings exemptions. Members were instructed to limit discussion to the stated purpose and not take final action until returning to open session.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill that I filed requests to qualify his service to the Nevada system of higher education to be
• But in the state of Nevada, the law and policy has been changed there prior to my arrival so that any
• new employee in the Nevada system of higher education is now required to enter a defined contribution
• But in the state of Nevada, the law and policy has been changed there prior to my arrival so that any
• new employee in the Nevada system of higher education is now required to enter a defined contribution

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Public Service heard testimony on a range of retirement-related bills, with several witnesses and advocates focusing on pension equity, veteran benefits, and recognition for public safety workers. Representative Dennis Gallagher and Mass Retirees supported legislation to increase the long-standing veterans’ bonus from $15 to $50 per year of service, up to $1,000 annually, and described it as a modest, overdue adjustment with minimal fiscal impact. Mass Retirees also backed bills to raise the minimum survivor allowance for public retirees and to address inequities in Option B and Option C survivor benefits for retirees whose pensions were calculated under older mortality tables. The committee also heard a personal bill from Representative Jim Arceiro and Nathan McKinnon seeking creditable service for McKinnon’s years in the Nevada higher education system, which he said should count toward his Massachusetts retirement. Another individual bill was presented by Roberta Wollins, supported by Senator Keenan, to remedy what she described as misleading retirement advice from UMass Boston that affected her ability to buy back prior service and made her retirement planning inaccurate. Senator Keenan and others framed both cases as unique fairness issues rather than broad policy changes. A large panel from police, fire, corrections, EMS, and related organizations testified in favor of a COVID-19 retirement credit proposal and a study bill, arguing that essential workers who reported in person throughout the pandemic should receive recognition and a time-based retirement credit. Witnesses described exposure risks, illness, deaths, staffing strain, and long-term effects from COVID-19, and several committee members voiced support and appreciation for their service. The hearing concluded with no votes taken on the bills and a motion to adjourn, which was approved.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there anybody from the Nevada Department of Education in the room?
• A.V.H., is there anyone on the line from the Nevada Department of Education?
• The hardest working committee in the Nevada State Legislature.
• Austin Daley on behalf of the University of Nevada, Reno, for the record.
• Susan Kima, for the record, I represent the Nevada Association of School Superintendents, and we're in

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• For the record, my name is Doug Ferris, and I serve as the deputy director for the Nevada Department
• Having these folks out in rural Nevada is going to limit the amount of fees that that mobile processing
• I’m the president of Nevada Farm Bureau. Nevada Farm Bureau strongly supports this change.
• So, long story short, Nevada Farm Bureau strongly supports this.
• For the record, my name is Joelle Gutman-Dotson with Northern Nevada Public Health.

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Nevada was the first state to offer casinos, doing it in the depths of the Great Depression in 1931.
• Nevada was the first state to offer casinos, doing it in the depths of the Great Depression in 1931.
• The number of companies in Nevada who were operating for years did not meet the test.
• And one thing I've learned, it's interesting: New Jersey was the first state outside Nevada to offer
• I don't, but surely Nevada would be the highest.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• of Nevada Reno.
• Las Vegas and the University of Nevada Las Vegas and the University of Nevada<00:32:22.159> Reno.
• Um I actually started Nevada Reno.
• <01:21:36.960> or California or Washington or Nevada or California or Washington or Nevada
• We track them in Nevada.

Bills: HB1952, HB1951, HB1929, HB2497, HB2208, HB2572, HB1953, HB2551, HB2549, HB1737, HB1628, HB1769, HB2493, HB2264, HB1997, HB2168, HB2427, HB1805, HB2180, HB2184, HB2219, HB2469, HB2233, HB2519, HB2141, HB1904, HB2201, HB2410, HB2007, HB2385, HB2444, HB2349, HB2235, HB1872, HB2416, HB2291, HB2292, HB2263, HB2359, HB2455, HB1509, HB1514, HB1515, HB1648, HB2164, HB2323, HB1825, HB2172, HB1888, HB2005, HB2387, HB2358, HB2119, HB2276, HB2472, HB1714, HB2325, HB1541, HB1960, HB2140, HB2315, HB2367, HB2388, HB1696, HB2333, HB2138, HB2332, HB2283, HB2059, HB2057, HB2589, HB2417, HB2337, HB1588, HB2217, HB2020, HB1915, HB1742, HB2026, HB1965, HB1546, HB2360, HB1563, HB1749, HB2614, HB1511, HB1753, HB1849, HB1641, HB2161, HB2194, HB1721, HB2284, HB2188, HB1897, HB1880, HB1573, HB1876, HB20, HB2137

Keywords: HB1952, Hawaii agriculture, University of Hawaii, CTAHR, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resilience, Kauai, agricultural research station, extension station, capital improvements, general obligation bonds, GO bonds, appropriation, ADA compliance, Americans with Disabilities Act, certified kitchen, greenhouse, laboratory, field research, cesspool decommissioning, invasive species

Transcript Highlights:

• educators—asking them, if we were going to have better outdoor education or more outdoor education in Nevada
• this work for the past year and a half, so that we can make sure we have more outdoor education in Nevada
• So this is a great piece of legislation and an opportunity to do something here in Nevada collectively
• Jane Amon, and I'm the Nevada External Affairs Director for the Nature Conservancy.
• Michael Flores, on behalf of the University of Nevada, Reno, Madam Chair, members of the committee, I

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• again in Nevada.
• I'm going to move on quickly to something else in Nevada.
• in Nevada.
• It's going to connect all of Nevada. We're in the top ten largest states.
• So can you commit that Nevada will not have to restart?

Transcript Highlights:

• I'll give you just a few examples: Nevada did the same.
• You said Nevada, and that was one of my examples.
• Nevada noted that there was no noticeable change in rates.
• I think it was even 40% in Nevada.
• Nevada noted that there was no noticeable change due to the birthday rule.

Bills: SB101, SB21, HM52, HB132, SB14, SB20

Keywords: SB 101, Health Care Delivery and Access Act, repeal of repeal, sunset repeal, delayed repeal, health care, healthcare, access to care, medical services, provider regulation, state health law, New Mexico, SB 21, Medicare supplement, Medigap, open enrollment, guaranteed issue, birthday month enrollment, health insurance, insurance regulation

Transcript Highlights:

• You know the Nevada test site now known as the Nevada National Security Site, NNSS, but we really still
• call it the test site Nevada so I'll defer to that.
• Anyway, the Nevada test sites played a critical role in nuclear weapons development.
• What we're doing in Nevada is working.
• risk severe economic and environmental impacts not just in Nevada but primarily in Nevada placing more

Keywords: national security, nuclear energy, Department of Defense, military readiness, public commentary, nominations

Summary: The meeting convened with a focus on the scrutiny of various nominations and their implications for national security. Mr. Brandon Williams was nominated as the Undersecretary of Energy for Nuclear Security, drawing attention to the pressing need to modernize the U.S. nuclear arsenal amid growing threats from other countries. This was echoed in discussions led by committee members who expressed concern over military readiness and the management of military installations, with emphasis on ensuring accountability within the Department of Defense. Public commentary was notably supportive of the nominations, although some concerns were raised regarding the administration's broader strategies.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so, Brittany, you're here from Sierra Nevada? Can I grab that? Thank you.
• I'm with the Sierra Nevada. Good morning, Chair Bennett. Brittany Covich.
• I'm with the Sierra Nevada Conservancy. I'm the Policy and Outreach Division Chief.
• So good example of this is a Sierra Nevada Conservancy received great, very, very gratefully, the Nevada
• And as was said by Sierra Nevada Conservancy earlier, we have...

Summary: The subcommittee began by announcing a change in the agenda order, moving item 6 ahead of item 1 and then item 7, and noting there would be no votes taken on any items that day. Item 6 covered a proposed operational efficiencies control section for the Natural Resources Agency that would let multiple departments jointly fund landscape-scale or multi-jurisdictional projects and allow Finance to transfer climate bond funds to a lead state entity. The LAO said the proposal was reasonable but suggested the Legislature consider requiring summary notification on how it is used; Finance said it would consider that request. Item 7 focused on the 2026-27 biodiversity and nature-based solutions spending plan. Finance and the Wildlife Conservation Board described the climate bond funding for habitat restoration, wildlife crossings, public access, tribal nature-based solutions, and related work, including $111 million proposed for WCB and $30 million for Salton Sea habitat and public access projects. The LAO supported the overall approach but flagged the San Andreas Corridor Program as an area where the Legislature may want to specify geographic priorities. Members discussed the pace of Salton Sea work and whether the proposed projects would count toward disadvantaged community goals. Item 8 addressed Cal Fire’s aviation contract and staffing needs for wildfire response. Cal Fire said year-round fire activity, a larger and more complex aircraft fleet, and labor market pressures justified the proposed contract increase, including more mechanics, pilots, and maintenance support. The LAO recommended approval, saying the proposal addressed health and safety concerns. Members asked about contractor staffing, competition in the bidding process, and future technology for early fire detection and suppression. The committee then took up item 1 on golden mussel containment. Fish and Wildlife described the invasive species’ spread in the Delta, the task force and response framework, and a request for eight new positions funded by Prop. 4 to support control plans, outreach, monitoring, research, and coordination with partners and law enforcement. Members pressed the department on whether the state should fund more direct decontamination infrastructure and grants to local water managers, and on the realistic goal of containing the mussel. The chair and several members emphasized the urgency of the threat and requested an itemized breakdown of the $20 million request. The hearing then moved to a broader LAO overview of wildfire prevention and response funding, where the LAO summarized the state’s funding mix and warned that ongoing wildfire resilience funding will likely decline as one-time bond and GGRF funds are exhausted, prompting discussion of long-term funding options and the balance between prevention, suppression, and community hardening.

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, under a compact among the seven states—those four that I mentioned, plus Nevada, California, and
• So a quick schematic here of... those four that I mentioned plus Nevada California and Arizona in 1922
• , remembering Nevada only has 300,000 acre-feet of water. feet of conservation we won't cut you more
• remembering Nevada only has 300,000 acres feet of water 800 acre-feet at Nevada, remembering Nevada
• The rockets that they test in Nevada, you see these bright lights like that.

Bills: HB2042, HB2052, HB2055, HB2056, HB2094, HB2098, HB2185, HB2328, HB2758, HB2798

Keywords: solar radiation management, environment, prohibition, Arizona Revised Statutes, public health, complaint process, Attorney General, groundwater management, water conservation, irrigation, water supply, brackish groundwater, water supply development, desalination, water infrastructure, financial assistance, environmental reviews, brackish water, groundwater, water resources

Summary: The committee first received an update from Arizona Department of Water Resources Director Tom Buschatzky on Colorado River negotiations and post-2026 operating rules. He described the legal framework governing Arizona’s allocation, argued that Arizona and the lower basin have already made substantial conservation cuts, and said the upper basin is pressing positions Arizona views as inconsistent with prior Supreme Court rulings. He emphasized the need to move water from upstream reservoirs to Lake Mead, warned of continued shortage risk, and said the state is seeking an equitable deal through ongoing federal and interstate negotiations. Members asked about outside water use, tourism and recreation impacts, and tribal water rights, including the Navajo-Hopi-San Juan Southern Paiute settlement. Buschatzky said the state’s delegation and bipartisan support have been helpful and urged continued public and legislative backing. The committee then heard House Bill 2758, which would expand McMullen Valley groundwater transportation authority and add related requirements and guardrails, including an amendment increasing the La Paz County transportation cap from 10% to 50% of the annual volume and adding conditions for sales or leases from historically irrigated acres. Supporters, including bill sponsor advocates, the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, and the Home Builders Association, said the bill would create a lawful, regulated transfer option similar to the Harquahala model, support housing growth, and include oversight through hydrologic studies, pumping limits, and monthly reporting to ADWR. Opponents, including La Paz County Supervisor Holly Irwin’s statement, local residents, Sierra Club, and rural advocates, argued the bill would accelerate aquifer depletion, harm private wells and subsidence conditions, and benefit a New York hedge fund at the expense of rural communities. After debate, the committee adopted the Griffin amendment and then passed HB 2758 as amended on a 6-4 due-pass vote. The committee next took up House Bill 2098, which would modify bonding authority and public hearing notice requirements for county water augmentation authorities and allow local repayment agreements with WIFA. Pinal County Supervisor Stephen Miller and other supporters said the bill would clean up statutory language so the Pinal County Water Augmentation Authority can finance future water augmentation and infrastructure projects, including potential Bartlett Dam-related work, and better prepare for future Colorado River uncertainty. The Home Builders Association also supported the bill, saying it included proportionality protections for private utility water charges. The bill was moved for a due-pass recommendation and the committee proceeded to a roll call vote, with the transcript ending before the final vote result was shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• SBA funding because we know small businesses are the key economic drivers in every Nevada community.
• In fact, Nevada is known for our large, obviously, casinos in Las Vegas, but to be honest, 99 percent
• of businesses in Nevada are small businesses.
• Well good, well we might be reaching out to you for some connection with Nevada.
• Iowa, and like Senator Jackie Rosens in Nevada.

Keywords: SBIR, STTR, Innovate Act, small business, innovation, legislative reforms, economic growth, funding, technology transfer

Summary: The meeting focused on the Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Programs (SBIR-STTR), emphasizing the critical reforms necessary to enhance their effectiveness. Chair Ernst introduced the Innovate Act to streamline processes, ensuring funding is awarded based on merit and addressing existing abuses within the system. The discussion was robust, with numerous members expressing concerns about phase transitions and the need for targeted funding to support impactful technological innovations. The conversation also highlighted the program's importance in fostering economic growth, particularly for small businesses in rural areas, and the urgency for legislative changes as the program's authorization approaches expiration.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm from Nevada County. I'm on the Grass Valley School Board.
• I'm a member of the Peace and Justice Center of Nevada County, and I'm also affiliated with Nevada County
• I'm a member of the Peace and Justice Center of Nevada County, and I'm also affiliated with Nevada County
• I'm a resident of Nevada County.
• I live in Nevada County. I strongly oppose the bill. My name is Ellen Goodwin.

Summary: The Assembly Education Committee held a special hearing on AB 715, with the authors presenting the bill as a response to rising anti-Semitism in K-12 schools. The authors said the measure is intended to strengthen protections for Jewish students, improve district accountability, expand the uniform complaint process, clarify protections related to religion and nationality, and create a state-level anti-Semitism coordinator. They emphasized that the bill was developed through collaboration with the Black, Latino, AAPI, and Jewish caucuses and argued it is meant to protect all students from hate while preserving legitimate classroom discussion. The hearing included extensive public testimony. Supporters, including students, parents, rabbis, Jewish organizations, and some educators, described harassment, biased curriculum, delayed or ineffective school responses, and fear among Jewish students and families. They urged the committee to act to make schools safer and more responsive. Opponents, including teachers, ethnic studies advocates, civil liberties groups, Palestinian rights advocates, and some Jewish parents, argued the bill was rushed, vague, and could chill academic freedom, censor discussion of Palestine and Israel, and expand complaints against teachers and school districts. Several witnesses said existing complaint and anti-discrimination systems already address these issues. Committee members then questioned the authors and witnesses about implementation, definitions, and possible effects on curriculum and school boards. The authors said the bill is still intent language and that details would be refined in further negotiations with stakeholders. Representatives from the California School Boards Association and California Teachers Association raised concerns about the new language and possible unintended consequences, while ACLU California Action said it had concerns but wanted to keep working on the bill. The transcript does not show a final vote or action taken on AB 715 during this hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Matt Kremens, California-Nevada Conference of Operating Engineers, in support.
• Today, as you know, I have Matt Kremens with the California-Nevada Conference of Operating Engineers.
• Matt Kremens, on behalf of the California-Nevada Conference of Operating Engineers.
• Matt Kremens, California-Nevada Conference of Operating Engineers, strong support.
• Matt Kremens, California Nevada Conference of Offer.

Summary: The Assembly Labor and Employment Committee heard and advanced several bills focused on worker protections, training access, wage enforcement, outreach, and workplace safety. SB 513 would require employees to have access to their training and certification records; supporters, including laid-off refinery workers and labor organizations, said employers sometimes withhold records during layoffs, while committee members called the practice unacceptable. The bill passed 5-0 and was re-referred to Appropriations. SB 809 addressed misclassification of construction truck owner-drivers by offering employers amnesty if they reclassify workers as employees and adopt a two-check payment system; labor and construction trades groups supported it, and it passed 5-0 to Judiciary. SB 578 would codify the California Workplace Outreach Program, which funds trusted community organizations to educate workers about their rights. Supporters described the program as a proven way to reach low-wage, immigrant, and hard-to-reach workers, especially amid wage theft, retaliation, and immigration enforcement concerns. The bill passed 5-0 to Appropriations. SB 261 would strengthen collection of wage theft judgments by creating a public list of nonpaying employers and adding penalties after six months of nonpayment; county enforcement officials and labor advocates said it would help workers recover unpaid wages. It passed 6-0 to Judiciary. The committee also approved SB 369, which would require skilled and trained workforce standards for Salton Sea restoration projects, with supporters saying the work is hazardous and should use trained labor; it passed 6-0 to Appropriations. Finally, SB 20 sought to address silicosis in stone countertop fabrication by requiring training and certification protections for workers; supporters said the disease has caused deaths among mostly Latino workers, while industry groups supported the bill with amendments and requested implementation resources. It passed 6-0 to Appropriations. The committee also adopted a consent calendar of four additional bills and adjourned after all listed measures were moved forward.

Transcript Highlights:

• A good example of our ability to develop new network routes is our work in Nevada.
• A good example of our ability to develop new network routes is our work in Nevada.
• is our work in Nevada. is our work in Nevada.
• Zayo has partnered with multiple Nevada Zayo has partnered with multiple Nevada state<00:41:20.440
• Nevada Department of Transportation. Nevada Department of Transportation.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 KCNA Request for Proposal Process 00:00:01 Overview of KWIC Board and Funding of Kentucky Wired Network Refresh 00:18:10 Zayo Network Services 00:34:40 Discussion of Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) Funding 00:57:32, 958, all

Summary: The committee first focused on a disputed KCNA procurement for a statewide network-related RFP. Members questioned why the RFP had been labeled non-technical, whether COT should have reviewed it, and whether the KCNA board could direct that it be withdrawn. Finance and Administration Cabinet counsel Barbie Dickens said the RFP was authorized by KCNA working with procurement services after termination of the prior contract and breach notices, was issued in November 2025, paused during a protest, later resumed, and remained an open procurement. She said the agency—not the board—directs the procurement process, though she acknowledged an agency and OPS could cancel or reissue an RFP if needed. Legislators pushed back, citing KRS 154 and House Bill 314 as evidence that the KCNA board controls contracts and operations, and one member said the board had requested the RFP be withdrawn. Dickens said she could not predict the outcome and was not KCNA’s counsel. The discussion also touched on whether the current director had asked to stop the RFP and whether that request had been denied, with no final action taken during the exchange. The committee then turned to Kentucky Wired Infrastructure Corporation and the Kentucky Wired refresh project. Jim Barnhart described the structure of the nonprofit corporation, the role of Quick and Quack in the financing and operations arrangement, and the board membership, noting that the refresh funding had been approved in the 2024-26 capital budget. He said the equipment upgrade is necessary because of end-of-life hardware and software support issues, and that the refresh would expand capacity, lower risk, and reduce operating costs. Barnhart said some equipment had already been received, the rest would be purchased later, and the project should begin before September and take about a year to complete. When asked about contract disputes involving Ledcor and whether the vendor had an ongoing contract, Barnhart and the authority representative said they had not been notified of any issues and were not directly involved in that contract dispute. Committee members also raised concerns about a prior market test and whether a lower-cost bidder had been blocked from a previous RFP process. Barnhart said he understood Quack could make that decision and that the Commonwealth did not have input so long as the network was maintained, but he was not involved at the time. A legislator then read from the KCNA statute and argued that the board, not agency staff, is supposed to direct KCNA contracts and operations, saying House Bill 314 did not change those duties. The chair agreed the committee’s intent was for the board to control KCNA and direct contracts, and the discussion ended with a transition away from the KCNA dispute toward future testimony, including a presentation from Zayo Networks on open access networks and broadband infrastructure.