Transcript Highlights:

• The Student Academic Success Subcommittee will come to order.
• In my personal experience, I was a student in leadership advocacy.
• I met founders of nonprofits, and I'm among students with ideas, and I met students with dreams who were
• ENVIRONMENTS FOR STUDENTS WITH AUTISM.
• I worked alongside students on the autism spectrum every single day.

Summary: The Student Academic Success Subcommittee met with a quorum and considered two PCS bills. PCS for HB 1059, by Rep. Booth, would designate the first week of November as Florida Speech and Debate Week to recognize speech and debate programs and the educators, coaches, judges, and school districts that support them. Supporters, including students and advocates, testified that speech and debate builds critical thinking, civics knowledge, confidence, and respectful civil discourse, and several members praised the students’ testimony and the program’s value. The bill was reported favorably by a 14-0 vote. The committee then heard PCS for HB 851, by Rep. Long, which requires each school district’s professional learning system to include at least one annual autism-specific training opportunity for teachers and school-based administrators, developed with the Center for Autism and grounded in evidence-based practices. The sponsor said the bill is intended to give educators practical tools to support students with autism, while members asked questions about scope, virtual training, charter schools, and the relationship to existing law. Public testimony and member debate largely supported the bill, with speakers emphasizing the need for better educator preparation and inclusion for students with autism. The bill also passed unanimously, 14-0, and was reported favorably. At the end of the meeting, members and the chair offered brief closing remarks thanking colleagues and staff and reflecting on the committee’s work, with the chair noting it may have been the committee’s last meeting of the session.

Transcript Highlights:

• Those online students in those districts are funded the same exact way as in-person students are funded
• Students.
• Receiving funding for those virtual students that they had last year, even though those students aren't
• That actually serves the students; i.e., Gallup receives the funding, not the district in which the students
• The SEG has three factors in it for homeschool students and for... charter school students who want to

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you know how much it costs to educate a student in Weare per student?
• Do you know how much it costs to educate a student in Weare per student?
• student in where per student? student in where per student?
• school students presently. school students presently.
• when a when a student le one student um when a when a student le one student um either<03:10:12.479

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• for all students in for all students in Minnesota<00:06:55.160> hello<00:06:55.479> my<
• <01:03:46.880> have students 46,000 of these students have students 46,000 of these students
• Twenty-eight percent of our students are students of color.
• It is simply discriminatory against nonpublic students, not schools, but students.
• We admit all students who apply.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So regardless of where the students are located Proviso language, that it's a per-student funding model
• Because if I serve 10 students or 50 students, I've got to have a base amount of money to have a teacher
• So the model generates the activity that the students are actually enrolled in, and not all students
• You know, one student took it, one student passed, and they have 100% passage rate, and then the money
• So they could, hypothetically, that 100% passage rate could be just one student took it, one student

Summary: The Higher Education Budget Subcommittee met to review funding models for the Florida College System and district workforce education programs, with an emphasis on how new dollars are allocated in the program fund and how performance and targeted funding are incorporated. Chancellor Hebda explained the Florida College System model, including base program funding, student success and pipeline funds, performance incentives for industry certifications, and the 2022 president-developed formula that weights enrollment, workforce enrollment, completions, small-college factors, and regional cost differences, plus a targeted funding floor for colleges below a minimum per-FTE level. Vice Chancellor Goodman then outlined the district workforce model, which uses lagged enrollment, program cost weights, local revenue offsets, small-district adjustments, and unmet-need calculations to distribute lump-sum appropriations to school districts offering workforce education. The department also provided updates on several grant programs and funding delays. Goodman said the Workforce Development Incentive Grant, Pathways to Career Opportunities Grant, Graduation Alternative to Traditional Education Startup Grant, and teacher apprenticeship/mentor bonus programs all involve multi-year awards and often require reversions and reappropriations because projects are delayed, extended, or not fully obligated by year-end. She said the department is moving toward an electronic grants system and had already adjusted internal deadlines to speed awards, while acknowledging some reimbursement delays and explaining that mentor bonuses for teacher apprentices will not be paid until the first cohort reaches the statutory timing requirement. Members asked about tracking whether CTE students work in their trained fields, how Xello is used to inform students about career pathways, how FTE is calculated, whether the funding formulas could encourage growth over quality, and how students with disabilities are counted in workforce funding. Questions also focused on tuition, enrollment trends, and the gap between college and university funding. The committee heard that tuition has remained flat for more than a decade, enrollment has rebounded from COVID and is projected to exceed pre-pandemic levels, and the college system’s funding per FTE varies widely. Valencia College President Kathleen Plinsky testified in support of the proposed formula and an additional $200 million for the Florida College System, saying Valencia is the second-largest college in the state but ranks last in per-FTE funding, which has made it difficult to recruit and retain faculty and admit qualified students in high-demand programs like nursing. The committee took no vote and adjourned after the presentations and questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• AND THEY SEE A MULTITUDE OF STUDENTS.
• SOME STUDENT YOU MAY HAVE ONE THAT IF YOU DO NOT KNOW THE STUDENT YOU WOULD THINK THERE WAS THREATENING
• IT WAS AT THE STUDENT UNION.
• WE HAD A STUDENT THAT OPENED FIRE AT THE STUDENT UNION AND IF YOU GO BACK AND LOOK AT THE RESPONSE YOU
• ARE YOU TALK ABOUT FLORIDA STUDENTS?

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh and for academic the students.
• We do not hire these students.
• them goes right back to the students. them goes right back to the students.
• . students. students.
• students serving for academic purposes. students serving for academic purposes.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The House Standing Committee on Primary and Secondary Education met and first considered House Bill 141, which would make type 1 diabetes information available to students through KDE, school district websites, and school locations such as youth service centers, front offices, and nursing stations. The sponsor explained that a committee substitute removed a requirement that districts distribute the information annually to students, in response to concerns about teacher workload. Members spoke in support, citing the value of helping schools recognize the signs of type 1 diabetes and the usefulness of the information for families. The committee adopted the substitute and passed the bill favorably with the substitute attached. The committee then heard House Bill 415, described as a cleanup measure to House Bill 300, the teacher due process law. The sponsor said the substitute would improve communication between the Education Professional Standards Board and superintendents, remove a requirement that teachers meet with EPSB when a complaint is filed, and move appeal hearings from EPSB to the Attorney General’s office effective July 1, 2027. Members discussed the changes and the bill passed favorably with the committee substitute attached. Finally, the committee took up House Bill 555, which would define student-based enterprises and allow local school boards to decide whether to permit them. The sponsor and a Taylor County High School business teacher described student-run businesses as hands-on learning opportunities that build workforce skills, generate funds for student scholarships and activities, and operate under local control. Members asked about red book compliance, tax and business issues, and how the enterprises relate to programs like DECA and Junior Achievement. The committee passed the bill favorably, and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• being a high school student. being a high school student.
• <01:34:46.880> doesn't students. students can say it doesn't students. students can say it
• on students freedom of speech. on students freedom of speech.
• . students. students.
• students from bullying?

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• > may student enrollment because students may student enrollment because students may not<00:29
• Students who are low-income, students of color, first-generation students, students with disabilities
• Students who are low-income, students of color, first-generation students, students with disabilities
• , students of color, low-income students, students of color, students<01:13:48.800> first<01:13
• , students with students first generation, students with disabilities,<01:13:51.920> all<01:13

Keywords: Call to Order and Roll Call: 0:00:00 Approval of Minutes: 0:01:45 Federal Education Updates 0:02:12 Dual Credit Updates: 0:43:38 Kentucky State University's Doctoral Program Request: 01:27:08 Postsecondary Accreditation: 1:49:05 Consideration of Referred Administrative Regulations: 2:14:48 Adjournment 2:16:31, 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the previous meeting minutes, and heard a presentation from Austin Reid of the National Conference of State Legislatures on education-related provisions in the federal One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1). Reid said the law is projected to increase the federal deficit over 10 years, with major savings coming from Medicaid, student loan changes, and SNAP. He focused on how those changes could affect schools, including possible effects on free and reduced-price meal certification, state funding formulas that use SNAP as a proxy for low-income status, and Medicaid-funded school services for students with disabilities. Reid also outlined the new federal scholarship tax credit, which gives a dollar-for-dollar credit for donations to qualifying scholarship-granting organizations. He said families up to 300% of area median income may benefit, the program begins in 2027, and states must opt in and designate eligible organizations. He noted unresolved questions about whether states can add their own criteria and said Treasury regulations will be important. He also described the expansion of 529 plans to cover more K-12 and postsecondary expenses. On higher education, Reid explained a new workforce Pell grant option for short-term programs, with states and governors playing a role in determining eligible programs. He said the programs must meet placement, completion, and earnings measures and that implementation is expected to be tight before the July 1, 2026 effective date. He also reviewed student loan changes, including lower institutional loan limits, prorated borrowing for part-time enrollment, new caps on graduate and Parent PLUS loans, and a new earnings-based accountability standard that could make some programs ineligible for student loans if graduates earn too little. No votes were taken beyond approval of the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• and all students across students and all students across Minnesota.<01:18:16.320> Beginning<01
• <01:20:43.040> students academic supports our students students academic supports our students
• Public charter school students are public school students.
• students are public school students. students are public school students.
• our students and staff. our students and staff.

Bills: HF3492, HF3493, HF3494, HF3495, HF3602

Keywords: school safety, grants, education funding, Northern Lights Express, security improvements, rural schools, safe schools, charter schools, nonpublic schools, Tribal education, funding increase, safe schools aid, school security, mental health support, Tribal schools, cybersecurity, funding, mental health, evidence-based plans, public safety

Transcript Highlights:

• And finally, about the money following the student.
• And one of the three students, one of three students in my district is an English language learner.
• But this bill is not for low-income Texas students.
• Integrated students and diverse student outcomes better.
• Yeah, less than 2% of public school students served.

Bills: SB2, SJR36, SB2, SB2, SR29, SB2

Keywords: Maverick County, recognition, economic development, Texas Senate, community celebration, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• SOME INTERVENTIONS THAT THE STUDENT RECEIVES.
• WE MONITOR AND TRACK THE STUDENTS READING LEVELS AND WE ARE ABLE TO SEE THE READING LEVELS OF THE STUDENTS
• WE WANT OUR SCHOOLS TO BE ABLE TO ACCELERATE THOSE STUDENTS AND GET THE STUDENTS IN ADVANCED COURSES
• OUR STUDENTS IN EVERY AREA.
• IN YOUR CASE, STUDENTS.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• their status as a student of USF.
• So current USF students would still be USF students, and current New College students would still be
• New College students.
• students.
• That is 556 FTIC students total and 291 transfer students. 34% of all undergraduates.

Transcript Highlights:

• and Native students.
• and Native students.
• um Leech Lake students and and Native<00:05:29.319> students Native students Native students
• For students who are enrolled, we get a different funding level than students who are not enrolled.
• /c><01:22:24.080> students American Indian students American Indian students and<01:22:26.520>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And along with that act is, again, evaluating students a little more often and catching those students
• to student to student um<00:05:31.120> some<00:05:31.280> of<00:05:31.479> the<
• um parents are really those students um parents are really those students Champions<00:09:56.600
• and students with disabilities.
• That really advocate for the special ed students and students with disabilities.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's also helping us lift up that student experience and make sure those students are retained and they
• Student success means recruiting more students than other programs.
• But 93 students have come back.
• So it's not just recent students. These students go back a ways.
• So it's not just recent students. These students go back a ways.

Summary: The committee met at NDSU and approved the April 9 minutes. The main purpose of the meeting was an informational presentation from NDSU President David Stewart and university leaders on the university’s priorities, including enrollment, student success, research, commercialization, and use of New Horizons funding. Stewart emphasized a “One NDSU” approach, thanked legislators for past support, and said the university will focus on recruitment and retention, a new strategic plan, and growing research and tech transfer while serving North Dakota’s workforce needs. University leaders said NDSU is using tuition waivers more strategically and will work to reduce them over time through scholarship optimization. Provost Sherry Vale described academic portfolio reviews, program closures or consolidations, strategic hiring, and workload policies aimed at aligning resources with demand. They also highlighted student outcomes, including high completion rates, strong employment placement, and NDSU’s role in producing a large share of the state’s engineers, nurses, and agriculture graduates. Several students testified about how NDSU’s mentoring, internships, research, and support services helped them succeed. The committee also heard from partners on New Horizons-related collaborations: Gateway to Science described K-12 STEM outreach in rural and tribal areas, and Sanford Research discussed joint research efforts, including COBRE-related work, obesity and GLP-1 studies, and a joint biostatistics hire. Later speakers highlighted Governor’s School and NDSU’s research and commercialization efforts, including growth in research expenditures and invention disclosures. No additional votes or formal actions were taken beyond approving the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• , conduct in-person interviews with students during those visits, aligned with the students' IEPs, to
• Nonetheless, all students need access.
• SB 414 puts students first, particularly students who have often been left behind, students with specific
• We serve a diverse student population where the majority of students are not on track to graduate.
• I'm very focused on students and student outcomes and all of this.

Summary: The Assembly Education Committee met without a quorum for much of the hearing and heard several bills out of order. SB 249 by Senator Umberg would move county board of education elections from the primary to the statewide general election. Supporters, including the League of Women Voters and many educators, argued the change would increase turnout and make the electorate more representative. The Orange County Board of Education opposed the bill, saying it would increase costs, reduce local control, and bury education races on crowded general-election ballots. The chair and members discussed turnout, cost, and representation, but the bill was held pending a quorum. Senator Grove presented SB 373, which adds safeguards for California students placed in out-of-state non-public schools through IEPs. The bill would require more robust LEA and CDE oversight, including annual site visits, student interviews, quarterly contact, stronger certification standards, and restrictions on prone, supine, and mechanical restraints. Testimony from a survivor of an out-of-state placement and from advocates emphasized abuse, neglect, and the need for stronger monitoring. There was broad support and no opposition testimony, but the measure was also held pending a quorum. Senator Ashby presented SB 568, the epinephrine in schools modernization act, to clarify and expand requirements for stocked epinephrine so they clearly apply to all public schools, including preschool programs. School nurses and medical experts said the bill would close gaps created by universal preschool and ensure life-saving treatment is available for anaphylaxis. The committee discussed dosing and implementation, and the bill was supported without opposition testimony. The committee also heard SB 414, the Charter School Accountability Act, which would strengthen fiscal oversight, audit standards, and transparency for charter schools and authorizers. Supporters said it responds to fraud and audit findings while preserving charter flexibility; opponents, including school employees and teachers, said it did not go far enough on authorizer accountability and small-district oversight. After discussion, the committee voted 7-0 to pass SB 414 as amended to Appropriations. The committee also briefly heard SB 743 by Senator Cortese, which would create an equalization reserve account to provide additional funding to underfunded school districts and reduce funding inequities tied to ZIP code. The author said the bill would support student achievement and teacher retention over time. The transcript cuts off before testimony or action on SB 743 was completed.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so we saw that the students.
• support and student aid.
• This is, of course, disproportionately impacts adult students, student parents, students that are close
• um students affects our students um students affects our students um significantly<01:58:28.480>
• students face wherever students choose to enroll, as the program has done for many years.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The Higher Education Finance and Policy Conference Committee met publicly to compare House and Senate positions on the higher education budget, with the chairs emphasizing transparency and alternating gavel control. Nonpartisan fiscal staff walked through a spreadsheet of differences across the Office of Higher Education and Minnesota State, including major items such as state grants, childcare grants, work study, tribal college grants, emergency assistance grants, hunger-free campus grants, student parent support, direct admissions, paramedic scholarships, and several medical residency and fellowship programs. The House and Senate also differed on administrative funding, campus sexual assault reporting, and a House FY25 cancellation that would be carried forward. Members discussed several of the larger policy and funding choices. The Senate explained its increase for Minitex as support for operating costs and statewide access to information. The House explained its cuts to student parent support and other items as necessary to work within a zero target and to prioritize direct aid to students, while the Senate said it focused on direct appropriations and access-related programs. On hunger-free campus grants and emergency assistance grants, the Senate said it was changing the distribution method and direct appropriations rather than reducing the overall money, while the House noted differences in whether nonprofit institutions remained included. The committee also reviewed Senate-only additions and reductions in Minnesota State, including free course materials, Lake Superior College remediation, and changes to the Kids on Campus appropriation. A representative from Lake Superior College testified that the PAS remediation funding would help address contamination issues at an emergency training site near Lake Superior and that the money was shifted from the Kids on Campus initiative. No final conference agreement or vote was taken in the portion of the meeting provided; the committee continued discussing differences and testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• Our particular interest is in aligning capstone projects with students' IEPs to ensure that students
• Our particular interest is in aligning capstone projects with students' IEPs to ensure that students
• or students that are in foster care.
• student that receives special education.
• When we looked at student Lexile performance and growth using comparable metrics, New Mexico students

Bills: HB30, HB120, HJR1, SB210, SB306

Keywords: teacher residency, Teacher Residency Act, public schools, teacher preparation, educator pipeline, teacher recruitment, teacher retention, student teachers, apprenticeship, co-teaching, mentor teachers, residency stipend, teacher salary, level one teacher, charter schools, school districts, New Mexico education, teacher workforce, principal stipend, cohort model

Transcript Highlights:

• THE DEPARTMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPPORT MILITARY STUDENTS WITH THE TIMELY TRANSFER OF STUDENT RECORDS
• FOR EXAMPLE STUDENTS OF ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY STUDENT PARENTS TRANSFERRED OR PENDING TRANSFER TO A FLORIDA
• I HAD A HANDFUL OF STUDENTS THAT IT SAW A PORTION OF STUDENTS COMING IN AND OUT AND THEY WERE MILITARY
• WHEN A NEW CHILD COMES IN THIS ANCHOR FOR LIFE, STUDENT FOR STUDENT, THEY WELCOME THE CHILD, THEY GET
• I DID NOT REALIZE WHAT A BIG DEAL IT WAS UNTIL THE STUDENT FROM THEIR STUDENTS FROM HILLSBORO CAME TO