Transcript Highlights:

• There's a change made so that in the event there are vouchers that weren't able to be placed in an area
• There was a building in Hopkins, for example, that had the correct number of stories but, in terms of
• There was a building in requirements.
• </c> of motans that live in public housing. of motans that live in public housing.
• </c> they could do both and that they are in they could do both and that they are in fact<00:04:51.280

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• It just seems fair, especially in times when we don't have money coming out of our ears, that they either
• It just seems fair, especially in times when we don't have money coming out of our ears, that they either
• 00:30:28.640><c> the</c> in the base in the the fiscal or in the in the base in the the fiscal or in
• And it's also not fair when the legislature appropriates, in one case, I know a $10 million grant in
• and it's also not fair when the legislature<00:54:49.839><c> appropriates</c><00:54:50.640><c> in</c

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Because the reality is people invest in Massachusetts and companies invest in Massachusetts in ways that
• Maybe I'll chime in and then other colleagues can weigh in.
• most in need.
• I'm in Medicaid.
• in Boston, where I remained in the ICU. ...where I remained in the ICU for a week with diabetic ketoacidosis

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Financial Services

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee held a lengthy hearing on a large docket of pharmacy and drug-pricing bills, with most testimony focused on PBM reform, 340B drug discount program protections, specialty medication access, and medication adherence. Chair James Murphy and Senator Paul Feeney opened the hearing and took testimony from legislators, patient advocates, pharmacists, health center leaders, industry representatives, and policy groups. Several speakers described delays, denials, high out-of-pocket costs, and pharmacy closures tied to PBM practices, while others emphasized the importance of community health centers and independent pharmacies in serving patients. On the 340B program, supporters including Senator Eldridge, Senator Payano, Community Care Cooperative, Fenway Health, the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, and several community health center leaders argued that bills such as H. 1107 and S. 819 would stop discriminatory PBM and manufacturer practices, preserve contract pharmacy access, and protect safety-net providers that say they reinvest savings into care, pharmacy expansion, interpreter services, behavioral health, and other services. Opponents including PhRMA, the Community Liver Alliance, and a public policy analyst argued the program lacks transparency and accountability, has grown beyond its original purpose, and may benefit large hospitals and for-profit entities more than low-income patients. They urged more reporting and oversight rather than expanding protections. On PBM reform, testimony supported bills including H. 1157, H. 1234, S. 724, S. 831, and related measures that would require rebate pass-through, ban spread pricing, limit steering to PBM-owned pharmacies, and improve reimbursement for community pharmacies. Independent pharmacists and patients said current PBM practices raise costs, create administrative burdens, and threaten access to local pharmacies. PCMA, representing PBMs, opposed the reforms, arguing PBMs lower costs, that plan sponsors choose to contract with them, and that the Health Policy Commission and CHIA should complete their ongoing study before new mandates are adopted. The committee also heard support for H. 1322 and S. 734 on specialty medications, and for H. 781 and H. 1305 on medication synchronization to improve adherence. No votes or formal actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• And if you so desire, as working in conference, working in the Comptroller's bill pattern in that dollar
• amount, basically the bill goes in with that in mind.
• For seven years in a row, our growth in new taxable value has been eclipsed by the increase in the DV
• And so in that case, it's based in Switzerland.
• And so in that case, it's based in Switzerland.

Bills: HB42

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: special prosecutor, state law, criminal justice, accountability, law enforcement

Summary: The committee heard Senator Flores lay out the committee substitute for HB 2894, which would expand state reimbursement eligibility for local governments disproportionately affected by the disabled veterans homestead exemption. Flores said the bill would add certain municipalities in Bell, Coryell, and Lampasas counties if lost ad valorem tax revenue equals or exceeds 10% of general revenue, while existing recipients would remain under the current 2% threshold. Lampasas and Bell County officials and the City of Killeen testified in support, describing significant revenue losses and urging adequate funding. One witness, Howard Avery, argued any reimbursement should be counted as property tax revenue for voter-approval rate purposes to avoid a windfall. The committee later adopted the substitute and reported the bill favorably, with one nay. The committee also heard SB 782, which would create a temporary severance tax exemption for restimulated inactive oil and gas wells, intended to encourage investment in mature wells. The Comptroller explained the revised fiscal note as effectively zero because the wells are currently marginal and not generating meaningful tax revenue, while industry witnesses said the bill could extend well life, support local economies, and reduce orphan-well liabilities. Public testimony was supportive, and the bill was left pending. Members then heard HB 3033, a DPS-related grant program funded by voluntary $3 donations on driver’s license and ID applications to support nonprofits aiding injured or fallen DPS officers and their families, including memorial highway signs. The DPS Officers Association supported the bill, citing existing foundation assistance and the need for a steady funding stream. The committee later reported the bill favorably. The committee also considered SB 524, which would permanently extend the franchise tax and fee exemption for qualifying veteran-owned businesses for their first five years; testimony from a veteran business owner and veterans advocates supported the measure, and the committee adopted the substitute and reported it favorably. Additional measures were laid out and left pending or voted out: HB 3594, a local San Antonio retiree health care fund bill with agreed changes for contributions, spouse benefits, and remarriage rules, was supported by stakeholders and reported favorably; HB 4738 would repeal small administrative fees tied to certain loans and was reported favorably; HB 42 on HEAF funding and HB 5246 on the Texas Space Commission were heard and left pending. The committee also reported HB 3474, a cleanup bill for the Pension Review Board’s investment performance review schedule, and HB 2802, the Austin firefighter retirement fund bill, both favorably. Finally, the committee took up HB 1056, which would allow gold and silver held in the Texas Bullion Depository to function as legal tender through debit-card transactions. Supporters framed it as a way to use hard assets and expand financial options, while bankers and some senators raised major operational, consumer-protection, tax, and constitutional questions; the bill remained under discussion as testimony began.

Transcript Highlights:

• For example, in Houston County, in the corner of the state, we have the only pharmacy in the county.
• </c> seen some increases in in losses um and seen some increases in in losses um and it<01:04:26.720>
• > the</c> is in is structured in a way that the is in is structured in a way that the assessments<01:
• a broad in a broad way we need sooner in a broad in a broad way we need to<01:14:02.800><c> pass</c>
• </c><01:14:18.280><c> both</c> are in place around the country in both are in place around the country

Committee: House Health Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• in their area.
• If you look in line three in the in the in the title it says to establish a code of conduct.
• And so we're now saying that we're in this economic boom in the state of Louisiana, we're in this industrial
• It's not fair to them. It's really not fair for us either.
• Yes, that's prohibited in the bill and in the amendment set.

Summary: The House Natural Resources Committee met on April 29, 2026, with a quorum present and took up several bills related to property rights, expropriation, renewable energy recycling, and local permitting. Representative Domangue first presented HCR 80 on private property rights, using it to highlight the 2025 landman code of conduct and the need for stronger guardrails in expropriation negotiations. She then deferred the resolution in order to allow Chairman Geymann to present HB 841, which was described as establishing a code of conduct for landmen and expropriation-related negotiations. The committee heard testimony and watched video examples from landowners describing intimidation, inadequate compensation offers, and the need for fair treatment. Amendments were adopted to broaden the bill to all certificate holders, prohibit threats about court costs and attorney fees, shorten response times, and add graduated fines and public posting for violations. HB 841 was reported favorably as amended, with no opposition cards recorded. The committee then considered HB 621 by Representative Coates, which would require recycling of decommissioned renewable energy infrastructure to the extent practical. After discussion with DEQ, the bill was amended to clarify that existing universal waste rules apply and to remove language that would have required the renewable facility owner to pay decommissioning costs in that section; the effective date was set for January 1, 2027. Testimony from renewable energy industry representatives supported the measure and explained that solar panels and related components can be recycled at high rates, with established markets for recovered materials. The committee adopted the amendments and reported HB 621 favorably. Next, Representative Jacob Landry presented HB 595, aimed at preventing local governments from unreasonably delaying or impeding energy projects through permit requirements, especially road permits affecting Haynesville Shale operations. After amendment, the bill required timely action on local road permits and deemed them approved if not acted on within 30 days. Supporters emphasized the economic importance of the Haynesville and the need for predictable permitting, while opponents argued the bill could further erode local authority, particularly regarding carbon capture and sequestration. The committee reported HB 595 favorably. Landry then presented HB 1191, creating a certificate of compliance process for oilfield and exploration and production sites to provide a cleaner path for cleanup, finality, and future investment. The bill drew technical and substantive amendments, including changes to definitions, confidentiality, and the role of DEQ; discussion continued over whether the bill should be deferred to allow more time to work through the remaining issues.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um if in fact in the state of Minnesota.
• I was in that queue. I was in at 2 seconds. You actually got into a second queue once you got in.
• I was in that queue. I it used to be. I was in that queue.
• I</c><00:32:36.240><c> couldn't</c> clicked in in two seconds, I couldn't clicked in in two seconds,
• in here.

Committee: Senate Transportation

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have to make sure that our elections are fair in this state, and knowing that there were 20 ballots
• ><c> and</c><00:08:28.759><c> we</c> that is in question um in and and we that is in question um in and
• </c> elections are fair in this state and elections are fair in this state and knowing<00:08:38.839><
• <c> um</c><00:18:34.600><c> your</c> any anybody in your in your um your any anybody in your in your
• </c><00:20:09.400><c> the</c> who's in the majority who's not in the who's in the majority who's not

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: House Republican leaders, led by Speaker-designate Lisa Demuth and Majority Leader Harry Niska, outlined their priorities for the upcoming Minnesota House session and said they intend to use an organizational majority to advance their agenda. They said their focus will be on stopping fraud, making government more accountable, reducing taxes and fees, and addressing affordability, energy costs, public safety, education, and permitting reform. Specific proposals mentioned included repealing the tax on Social Security benefits, rolling back automatic gas tax increases, repealing the nuclear moratorium, and changing state programs they said should be limited to people in the country legally. A central theme was the creation of a new House committee on fraud and agency oversight, which Republicans said will have subpoena power and be chaired by Rep. Kristin Robbins. They said the committee will investigate known fraud, review agency internal controls, and press agencies for information on staffing, office space, and cost savings. Rep. Jim Nash also described a proposed “fraud note” scoring system to rate agencies on whether they have implemented Office of the Auditor’s recommendations, with the goal of informing appropriations decisions. On education and public safety, Niska said Republicans want fewer mandates and higher standards in schools, citing low reading and math proficiency, and leaders said they want stronger accountability for repeat and juvenile offenders. They also said they expect committee chairs to be Republican, may reduce Democratic committee seats if Democrats do not show up, and are not planning a power-sharing agreement unless the chamber returns to a true tie. They discussed the pending court case involving Rep. Brad Tabke, a possible recall process for absent legislators, remote voting rules, and a special election timeline, while insisting they expect Democrats to appear on the first day of session and that they will proceed with organizing the House and electing a speaker on January 14.

Transcript Highlights:

• So<00:06:20.479><c> in</c><00:06:20.880><c> 2023,</c> So in 2023, So in 2023, 21,500 21,500 21,500 was
• </c> behind in support. behind in support.
• :13:23.200><c> a</c> in the bill in terms of if it's in a in the bill in terms of if it's in a commercial
• in the in the bill and that has been in in the in the bill and that has been in<00:14:01.600><c> the
• c> in</c><00:21:53.440><c> creating</c><00:21:53.760><c> this</c> Vang because in in creating this Vang

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We do have representatives from the Fair Board in attendance today, but I think that most of you have
• seen the Fair Board personnel over the course of either the interim or since we've been in here in session
• and</c><00:02:42.360><c> you'll</c> been in here in session and you'll been in here in session and you'll
• Something doesn't smack fair to me in this process. I'm concerned about that.
• to me in something doesn't smack fair to me in this<00:07:14.240><c> process</c><00:07:15.240><c> I'm

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:05 HB 545Discussion 00:00:40 HB 545 Vote 00:01:35 HJR 54 Discussion 00:02:25 HJR 54 Vote 00:03:10 HB 694 Discussion 00:03:42 HB 694 Vote 00:28:25, 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and first took up House Bill 545, a routine claims bill. Representative Tim Truett explained it as a measure to pay debts the Commonwealth owes. The bill received a motion, a second, and a roll call vote, and passed with favorable expression and no nay votes. Members then considered House Joint Resolution 54, which related to the Kentucky State Fair Board’s expansion plan. The chair explained that the resolution simply acknowledged receipt and approval of the plan so previously appropriated funds could be released. The resolution passed by roll call with no nay votes and was reported favorably to the floor. The main discussion centered on House Bill 694, concerning the Kentucky Teachers Retirement System medical insurance fund and the 2010 “shared responsibility” agreement. The bill would redirect employer contributions from local districts from the health side to the pension side once the plan reaches 100% funded. The chair and Senator Givens argued the bill was a continuation of the state’s long-term commitment to TRS and taxpayer responsibility, while Senator Neal raised concerns about fairness, the timing of the change, and whether the original agreement and statutory trigger for TRS board recommendations had been honored. Testimony from KEA President Eddie Campbell and former Jefferson County Teachers Association president Brent McMahan supported the 2010 agreement but urged the committee to pause the bill, saying the parties should return to the table and that the current proposal could conflict with the original understanding, create actuarial and legal issues, and potentially affect school district finances and bond ratings. Despite those concerns, the committee voted 8-1 to pass House Bill 694 with favorable expression, with Senator Neal voting no and explaining his objection as a process and good-faith concern.

Transcript Highlights:

• It unfortunately died in the killing fields that is known as the Appropriation suspense file in the Assembly
• in 2021, by Assemblyman Gallagher in 2023, then Assemblyman Anderson in 2010, just to name a few.
• I think the senator, are there any, anyone in the audience that wishes to stand up in support of the
• Seeing none, are there any witnesses or folks in the audience that wish to speak in opposition of the
• puts the folks in and requiring them to get it done in a certain very short time frame.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and heard SB 1053 by Senator Nilo, which would let county boards of supervisors in counties affected by a governor-declared disaster on or after January 1, 2026, extend by up to three years the five-year deadline for transferring a property tax base-year value to replacement property. The author said the bill is needed because recent wildfires and other disasters make the current five-year rebuilding window too short, and several members supported the measure as a common-sense local-control response to disaster recovery. There was no opposition, and the committee voted 5-0 to send SB 1053 to the Committee on Appropriations. The committee then heard SB 888 by Senator Seyarto, as amended in committee, which would exclude VA service-connected disability compensation from household income when determining eligibility for the low-income disabled veterans’ property tax exemption. The author argued the current law creates a catch-22 for disabled veterans whose benefits can push them over the income limit despite fixed incomes and high medical costs. Members from both parties praised the bill as fair and supportive of veterans, and there was no opposition testimony. The committee voted 5-0 to pass SB 888 as amended to the Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs. Afterward, the committee adopted a consent calendar containing SB 999, SB 1073, and SB 881. The roll was called on the consent items and the calendar was adopted. The meeting concluded with SB 1053 being called again for final action, where it was reported out on a 5-0 vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• They get $12,000 in their contingency fee.
• confidence in knowing that they can engage with companies that will want to service their needs in a
• And I don't think that's fair. I'll pass this around, too.
• Then you turn them in.
• If that's in order? Yes. All right, thank you.

Summary: The committee first approved the March 9 minutes without objection. It then took up Senate Bill 1286, which would establish Idaho consumer protection standards for paid assistance to veterans seeking federal benefits claims help. The bill was described as prohibiting upfront fees, limiting compensation to contingent and reasonable amounts, and banning misleading advertising, guaranteed outcomes, direct solicitation, overseas call centers, and use of medical professionals to influence claims. Representative Hill said the measure was needed to protect veterans from predatory claims companies, citing his own experience with high upfront fee offers. Testimony was uniformly supportive. Peter O’Rourke of the National Association for Veterans Rights said the bill would give veterans safety, security, and confidence through clear guardrails. Daniel Murphy, a veteran and DAV member, explained the basic VA claims process and argued that free veterans service organizations can help with the paperwork, while some private firms charge excessive fees for little work. John Blumstrom, representing a veterans-related organization, said his group supports transparency, disclosure of free services, and the bill’s restrictions on predatory practices. He also noted that veterans with mental health issues, TBI, PTSD, or MST may need tailored help navigating the process. Representative Bruce moved to send Senate Bill 1286 to the floor with a do pass recommendation. Members spoke in favor, saying the claims process can be confusing and burdensome and that the bill would help veterans who need assistance while preserving free service options. The committee approved the motion by voice vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• They get $12,000 in their contingency fee. Upgraded to 100%.
• They get $12,000 in their contingency fee. So that's ridiculous.
• in knowing that they can engage with companies that will want to service their needs in a safe and transparent
• Then you turn them in.
• It ensures that you have to act in the best interest of the veterans.

Committee: House Commerce and Human Resources

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And what I did in my structure, and then Representative Renetti...
• still stay here, though, in the offseason, in our winters, even with the bad weather, because they don't
• But again, I'm not sure in the current fiscal environment.
• Yeah, and I see the fairness argument too in the public, private.
• Maybe we need to put that in the limits then.

Committee: House Local Government, Elections and Pensions

Summary: The Committee on Pensions heard House Bill 1762 and House Bill 2059 together because both addressed the same issue: expanding Missouri’s tax deduction for private pensions. The sponsors explained that current law allows a limited deduction for private pension income only for taxpayers below certain income thresholds, and their bills would double both the deduction amount and the income limits. They said the proposal is intended to make private pension treatment more comparable to public pension treatment and to help retirees, self-employed people, and small business owners who saved through IRAs, SIMPLEs, or SEPs. One sponsor noted the bill was a scaled-back version of a prior proposal that would have fully eliminated the tax, in part to reduce the fiscal impact. Committee members asked several questions about who would benefit and how the limits work. The sponsors said the deduction would apply only to taxpayers under the income thresholds, would not help higher-income taxpayers, and would not apply to Roth accounts because the plans must be deferred. Members raised concerns about the fiscal note, which was discussed as roughly $135 million to $140 million, and about whether the income test could still allow some relatively wealthy taxpayers to qualify because Missouri adjusted gross income can differ from broader measures of income. The sponsors defended the bill as a fairness issue and noted that similar treatment already exists for public pensions. No witnesses testified in support, opposition, or for informational purposes. The committee did not take any vote or other action before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• still stay here, though, in the offseason, in our winters, even with the bad weather, because they don't
• But in terms of...
• But again, I'm not sure in the current fiscal environment.
• Yeah, and I see the fairness argument too in the public-private.
• Maybe we need to put that in the limits in.

Committee: House Pensions

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• While they were once rare, today 82% of new homes in the marketplace are in an HOA, with nearly one in
• ><c> in</c> with nearly one in four motans living in with nearly one in four motans living in an<00:04
• of</c><00:25:12.840><c> these</c> decreasing in density in some of these decreasing in density in some
• The challenge is to do it in a fair way following due process, and that is something that we do promote
• </c><00:54:07.520><c> due</c> to do it in a Fair Way following due to do it in a Fair Way following due

Committee: House Housing Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Testimony can be provided here in person in Carson City, via video conference in Las Vegas, or over the
• Testimony can be provided here in person in Carson City via video conference in Las Vegas or over the
• We know that in Nevada, in 2016, Everytown for Gun Safety, funded by Bloomberg, spent $20 million in
• In May of 2023, in New York, a 15-year-old girl In May of 2023, in New York, a 15-year-old girl murdered
• in Nevada since I was seven years old. ...in Las Vegas and Nevada and hunting in Nevada since I was

Bills: SB156

Committee: Assembly Government Affairs

Keywords: gun violence, firearm safety, special counsel, data collection, community initiatives, grants, Attorney General, public safety, suicide prevention, 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, in terms of how we determine people's success in the community.
• in.
• In their communities.
• That's in the future; it comes up in March.
• structure, in options, in programming, and in just custodial type of issues.

Summary: The Special Commission on Criminal Justice Reform 3.0 heard a presentation from the Massachusetts Parole Board focused on how parole, probation, the Department of Correction, sheriffs, and community providers coordinate reentry and supervision. Chair Angela Gomez described the board’s mission, its discretionary parole process, and the work of its transitional services, life sentence, victim services, and field services divisions. She highlighted 2024 activity including 2,810 institutional release hearings, 141 life-sentence hearings, 100 victim access release hearings, 18,238 victim notifications, 53 pardon petitions, 70 commutation petitions, 41 early termination applications, and supervision of about 2,993 committed parolees. She also emphasized the board’s shift toward evidence-based practices, individualized conditions, graduated sanctions, and more service-oriented supervision, including GPS guidelines and community-based interventions. Members focused heavily on data questions and the practical overlap among agencies. Senator Brownsberger and others asked for clearer breakdowns of releases, active supervision, average length of supervision, and distinctions between parole, mandatory release, revocations, and interstate compact cases. The board explained that some figures combine in-state and out-of-state cases, that roughly 400-plus people on supervision are lifers, and that annual revocations can remain technically supervised until final hearings. Members also asked for more detailed outcome data on employment, housing, treatment, and program retention, as well as a clearer breakdown of people who refuse parole versus those who decline after a grant. The board said it could provide follow-up data and noted that many refusals are driven by pending cases, desire to avoid supervision, or preference for serving time inside. The discussion also covered collaboration with UMass, including risk assessment research, training on best practices, and real-time support for medication and drug-testing issues through community pathways. The board and commissioners described shared housing and reentry resources such as MASH, community justice resource centers, sheriff-run programs like Rocky Hill and HOPE, and other placements that help stabilize people after release. Several speakers stressed that housing is the biggest gap and that agencies are trying to keep people in the community with employment, benefits, treatment, and safe housing. The commission also received an update on the Mattis-related clemency/parole cohort: 210 individuals were identified, 144 were immediately eligible for hearings, 100 hearings had been completed, 10 were scheduled, and some had postponed or were still being calculated for eligibility. The meeting ended with plans for a March 9 public hearing and a request for follow-up data and continued site visits before the commission moves into recommendations.

Transcript Highlights:

• And keeping in mind, that does not blend in the lifers. That does not blend in the lifers.
• in.
• People in the community.
• That's in the future, if it comes up in March.
• structure, in options, in programming, and in just custodial type of issues.

Keywords: 1212, all

Summary: The Special Commission on Criminal Justice Reform 3.0 heard a presentation from the Massachusetts Parole Board focused on how parole works with the Department of Correction, county houses of correction, sheriffs, probation, and community providers to support reentry and public safety. Chair Angela Gomez described the board’s mission, organizational structure, and 2024 activity, including institutional release hearings, life-sentence hearings, victim-notification events, pardons, commutations, and the supervision of nearly 3,000 committed parolees. She emphasized that the board is increasingly using evidence-based practices, risk assessment tools, and individualized conditions, including more structured GPS use and graduated sanctions, rather than relying on a purely punitive model. Commission members and sheriffs asked for more detailed breakdowns of parole and supervision data, including the difference between releases from Massachusetts custody and all releases under supervision, the average length of supervision, the share of lifers, revocations, and how many people are on dual supervision with probation. The board said it would provide follow-up data on length of stay, housing, employment, treatment participation, and outcomes. Members also discussed why some people refuse parole, noting that refusals can be driven by pending cases, a desire to avoid supervision, or a preference for a shorter custodial sentence over a longer supervised release or treatment placement. A substantial portion of the discussion focused on collaboration and shared resources across agencies, including MASH housing, community justice support centers, CRJ beds, sheriff-run programs such as HOPE and Rocky Hill, and UMass partnerships on risk assessment and community pathways. Speakers said the main gaps are not duplication but limited housing, treatment, and mental health capacity, especially for older people, people with substance use needs, and difficult-to-place populations such as sex offenders and arson offenders. The commission also received an update on the Matus decision: 210 individuals were identified as affected, 144 were immediately parole-eligible, 100 hearings had been completed, 10 were scheduled, and the rest were being processed as eligibility dates were confirmed. The meeting ended with plans for a March 9 public hearing and a request that members who have not toured facilities do so before future votes on correctional policy.

Transcript Highlights:

• say that there are no exemptions in the current proposal, and that's to be fair to every industry and
• I know we're dealing with that in my district, in Branson in particular.
• How many do we have in support? Three. How many in opposition? Three, how many in opposition? Two.
• I don't think it's fair to have a bill to hold us down in Missouri.
• Next up in support. Next up in support.

Committee: House Commerce

Keywords: 959, house, all