Transcript Highlights:

• Each month we feature performers from a different community.
• In 2021, some of you may have seen the performance of Amanda Gorman at the inauguration.
• In 2021, some of you may have seen the performance of Amanda Gorman at the inauguration.
• In 2021, some of you may have seen the performance of Amanda Gorman at the inauguration.
• In 2021, some of you may have seen the performance of Amanda Gorman at the inauguration.

Committee: House Legacy Finance

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We have upward of 28 employees, and we employ over 500 performers a year.
• It has become a real hub for out-of-town performers and a destination spot for tourists.
• So, you know, we're all working so hard—not just me, my business partners, the staff, the performers,
• So a really healthy mix of like... ...food-led spaces, live music, arts and performance, for example,
• It's restaurants, live performances, arts and culture, museums, hotels, It's restaurants, live performances

Summary: The Select Committee on Downtown Recovery held a hearing titled “Revitalizing California’s Downtowns Through the Nightlife Economy,” focused on how nightlife, arts, entertainment, and late-night transportation can support downtown recovery after the pandemic. Chair Matt Haney framed nightlife as a major economic and cultural sector and said the committee hopes to produce policy, budget, and legislative proposals, building on last year’s downtown recovery bills. The hearing included three panels: nightlife policy experts and a venue owner; representatives from entertainment, tourism, and rideshare; and remote witnesses from London, Philadelphia, and New York discussing how other cities manage 24-hour economies. Witnesses on the first panel emphasized that nightlife is an ecosystem that includes workers, venues, transportation, and public safety. Michael Fishman described the growth of night managers and argued that zoning, licensing, and land costs can either support or choke off creative venues; he also said extending hours can reduce congestion and unsafe spillover if done in a regulated way. Ben Van Houten highlighted San Francisco’s entertainment zones, hospitality zone liquor licenses, Type 90 music venue licenses, and other local reforms, while urging more state coordination and possible tax and licensing changes. Darcy Drolinger of Oasis said independent venues are operating on thin margins, have faced repeated near-closures, and need tools such as extended alcohol service hours to remain viable and preserve community and LGBTQ+ cultural spaces. The second panel focused on tourism, major events, and transportation. Another Planet Entertainment’s Mary Condi said festivals and venues like Outside Lands, the Castro Theatre, and the Fox and Greek theaters draw large numbers of visitors, support hotels and restaurants, and require close coordination with city agencies; she also raised concerns about unexpected possessory interest tax bills and the burden of secondary ticketing and cannabis taxes. Amelia Zamani of Cal Travel said travel and tourism remain a major economic engine and argued that nightlife is central to attracting international visitors, conventions, and major events, especially if California wants to compete with cities that allow later alcohol service. Lyft’s Nicholas Johnson said late-night rides serve workers as well as patrons, reduce DUI risk, and are essential for safe access to downtowns and event venues. In the final panel, officials from London and Philadelphia described their nighttime governance models. London witnesses said the city created a 24-hour city strategy, a night czar, and a nightlife commission, and found that nightlife supports economic activity, workforce retention, and safer, more diverse districts when paired with flexible licensing and better transit. Philadelphia’s Rahim Manning said his city treats the nighttime economy as a major industry, with a $26.2 billion annual impact, and stressed that it includes manufacturing, logistics, health care, transportation, food service, arts, and sports—not just bars and clubs. No votes were taken; the hearing was informational, with committee members asking questions about extended hours, transportation, family-friendly programming, cannabis activation, ticketing, and how California can better support a safe and competitive nighttime economy.

Transcript Highlights:

• is that the Environment Department and the Economic Development Department must establish clear performance
• You know, that's a calculation when you're performing, when you're doing a performer, That's a calculation
• whether or not you're, you know, when you're performing, when you're doing a performer in a building

Committee: Senate Senate Conservation

Summary: The committee heard House Bill 153, a proposal focused on industrial decarbonization and manufacturing. The bill would create a voluntary, market-based framework with three main parts: an Environmental Product Declaration program to help manufacturers measure and certify product carbon footprints, an industrial carbon reduction incentive and capital grant program to support lower-carbon production, and a rebate program to encourage purchase of low-carbon construction materials. Supporters said the bill would reduce emissions, strengthen supply chains, create jobs, and help New Mexico attract and grow low-carbon manufacturing. Members raised concerns about the anti-donation clause, whether the program would actually benefit New Mexico companies, the availability of in-state supply, the cost to the state, and whether a sunset should be added. Sponsors and agency representatives responded that the programs are voluntary, would be implemented through rules with performance and verification requirements, and are backed by a finite appropriation and reporting requirements. They also said the bill is intended to build both supply and demand, with examples cited such as low-carbon cement and engineered wood projects that could reduce emissions and create jobs. After discussion, the committee moved to a vote on House Bill 153. The motion to do pass was approved, with Senator Scott voting no and several members excused. House Bill 254, which had also been on the agenda, was not heard because the committee was called to the floor.

Transcript Highlights:

• So they performed very loudly. I'm not angry with them.
• </c><03:04:36.960><c> ever</c><03:04:37.680><c> for</c> seeing the worst performance ever for seeing
• </c><03:05:19.040><c> in</c><03:05:19.279><c> a</c> achievement in order to perform in a achievement
• in order to perform in a diametrically<03:05:20.240><c> different</c><03:05:20.479><c> way</c><03:05:
• </c> stories when it comes to high performing stories when it comes to high performing charter<03:09:

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Friday, September 19, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It being 10:00, I'd like to open the Legislative Performance Audit and Oversight Committee meeting, and
• With me is Jay Henry, performance audit supervisor.
• </c><00:02:54.879><c> audit</c> With me is Jay Henry, performance audit With me is Jay Henry, performance
• uh performance on special education. education. education. question. question. question.
• </c> group of auditors on the performance group of auditors on the performance audit<00:55:00.480><c>

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Legislative Performance Audit and Oversight Committee met to accept prior minutes and receive updates on ongoing audits. Audit staff reported progress on three education-related reviews: special education (34 of 71 observations completed, draft expected in the second quarter and final in the summer), education freedom accounts (22 of 41 observations completed, draft expected in the second quarter and final in the summer), and the doorway program (5 of 13 observations completed, draft expected by the end of February and final by April or May). No committee questions were raised on the audit status update. The committee then discussed possible future oversight topics, beginning with SNAP and concerns about fraud and work requirements. Members suggested inviting DHS officials and contract administrators to explain program operations and compliance, and also discussed whether the Department of Justice Medicaid fraud unit or other experienced officials could provide useful context. Members noted New Hampshire’s existing oversight layers, including the Executive Council and the joint HHS oversight committee, while also expressing interest in hearing more directly from department staff about staffing and contract management capacity. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on whether to pursue an audit of special education at the local school level. Members debated whether to wait for the ongoing statewide special education review and a legislative study commission report, or to begin scoping a local audit now so work could start sooner. Supporters argued that local-level spending, identification rates, and effectiveness vary widely by district and that an audit should examine both costs and outcomes; others cautioned that the scope would need to be manageable given limited audit staff and that the statewide report may help narrow the focus. The committee also briefly discussed a potential audit of the Bureau of Elderly and Adult Services, but no decision was made on that item.

Transcript Highlights:

• Optometry students also train in administering oral, topical, and injectable medications and perform
• Our current scope of practice limits us from performing these procedures in a clinical setting at this
• Optometrists routinely perform procedures that align very closely with those being proposed.
• Expanding the scope for optometrists to perform these minor eyelid procedures will ease this burden and

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> Although um when we're not performing Although um when we're not performing well<00:10:13.279><c
• ways we can perform have been pretty explicitly stated.
• ways we can perform have been pretty explicitly stated.
• ways we can perform have been pretty explicitly stated.
• can perform have been pretty ways we can perform have been pretty explicitly<00:54:12.800><c> stated

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:00:20 CRISP Shared Services 00:01:39 Rural Health Transformation Plan 00:30:55, 958, all

Summary: The Budget Review Subcommittee on Health and Family Services opened its first meeting of the 2026 interim session, took roll, and moved directly into presentations. The main presentation was from Ryan Bramble of Crisp Shared Services, who described the organization’s health information exchange and health data utility model in Kentucky and other states. He emphasized that Crisp is a nonprofit, that data ownership remains with providers, and that governance is local. He also outlined the technical infrastructure, including a master patient index, cloud-based data lake, support for modern standards like FHIR and USCDI as well as older formats, and data quality tools used to normalize and standardize information. Bramble said the model is intended to reduce duplication, lower costs, and support rural providers and future use cases such as reporting, analytics, and AI-enabled decision support. Members asked how the state can ensure the data is actually used and who should drive priorities for health care improvement. Bramble said Crisp can provide tools, expertise, and examples from other states, but local teams such as KHI and state stakeholders must tailor and lead utilization efforts. In response to questions about ownership and coordination, he stressed that successful HIE governance requires a multistakeholder body that includes hospitals, health plans, government, and other interests, with a unified approach rather than multiple competing directives. He also said the Commonwealth has an opportunity to convene those stakeholders and set clear priorities. A senator raised concerns that responsibility for Medicaid and broader health policy has become fragmented and suggested a stronger central role for the state, possibly through the Department of Public Health, to coordinate health priorities. Bramble agreed that a single convening authority and multistakeholder governance are important, and noted that local governance should determine what data is shared and how it is used. No votes or formal actions were taken during this portion of the meeting. After Bramble’s presentation and questions, the committee was told that Secretary Stack from the cabinet would testify next on the rural health transformation plan.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:29:35.320><c> and</c> will donate their time to perform and will donate their time to perform
• </c><00:34:41.960><c> at</c> participants that have performed at participants that have performed at
• ><c> have</c> Videos of these performances have Videos of these performances have traveled<00:34:51.960
• </c> those 45 performances. those 45 performances.
• And we collaborate with more than 100 artists and performers.

Committee: House Legacy Finance

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• This includes energy performance contracts, which fall under RSA 21-I:19-d.
• This includes energy performance contracts, which fall under RSA 21-I:19-d.
• This includes energy performance contracts, which fall under RSA 21-I:19-d.
• If we look at the definition of an energy performance contract, the energy performance contract is set
• If we look at the definition of an energy performance contract, the energy performance contract is set

Committee: House Municipal and County Government

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:03:29.520><c> where</c><01:03:29.760><c> the</c><01:03:30.000><c> drug</c> increase in evaluations
• where the drug increase in evaluations where the drug recognition<01:03:30.799><c> expert</c><01:03:
• lab so they could see firsthand what we would do, especially as part of drug recognition expert evaluation
• lab so they could see firsthand what we would do, especially as part of drug recognition expert evaluation
• Especially as part of drug recognition expert evaluation.

Bills: HB1974 , HB1853 , HB1973 , HB1574 , HB2619 , HB1966 , HB1643 , HB1671 , HB2558 , HB1854 , HB2173 , HB1575 , HB2229 , HB1535 , HB1978 , HB2508 , HB1549 , HB2187 , HB1550 , HB1977 , HB2314 , HB1871 , HB2319 , HB1591 , HB1858 , HB1898 , HB2372 , HB1765 , HB2012 , HB1706 , HB1962 , HB1963 , HB1975 , HB2009 , HB2083 , HB2224 , HB1877 , HB1959 , HB1626 , HB1665 , HB2488 , HB2456 , HB2548 , HB2207 , HB1832 , HB2079 , HB1985 , HB1618 , HB2486 , HB2242 , HB2045 , HB1703 , HB2236 , HB2480 , HB1976 , HB2287 , HB2288 , HB1777 , HB276 , HB1660 , HB1676 , HB1605 , HB1751 , HB1967 , HB2383 , HB2340 , HB1946 , HB2268 , HB1950 , HB2156 , HB2118 , HB1859 , HB1863 , HB1996 , HB2114 , HB2423 , HB2429 , HB2475 , HB2534 , HB2545 , HB1813 , HB1941 , HB2474 , HB2583 , HB1576 , HB1886 , HB1939 , HB2540 , HB2590 , HB2000 , HB2163 , HB2386 , HB1691 , HB1680 , HB2516 , HB1993 , HB2442 , HB1510 , HB1958 , HB1692

Keywords: HB1974, hearing loss, audiology, audiologist, hearing screening, hearing aids, cochlear implants, tele-audiology, communication access, assistive technology, speech-language pathology, deafness, hard of hearing, public health, kupuna, keiki, dementia, cognitive decline, fall prevention, State Health Planning and Development Agency

Transcript Highlights:

• that is included in Senator Carol's bill, and it's going to allow the hospital to do a clinical evaluation
• c> of</c><00:45:48.640><c> a</c><00:45:48.800><c> high</c><00:45:49.119><c> acuity</c> clinical evaluation
• of a high acuity clinical evaluation of a high acuity youth<00:45:50.000><c> before</c><00:45:50.400
• We need to have a process on the front end so that those evaluations can occur and the patient gets to
• the youth are brought to the hospital, but the hospital needs to be able to have that clinical evaluation

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:05 25 RS HB 534 - AN ACT relating to actions for forcible entry and detainer: 00:01:45 25 RS SB 111 - AN ACT relating to juvenile justice: 00:23:46 Children's Advocacy Centers of Kentucky: 01:13:26 Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Treatment in State and County Correctional Facilities: 01:25:28, 958, all

Summary: The committee approved the September 18 minutes and then heard testimony on House Bill 534, which would automatically seal dismissed eviction filings and protect youth from public disclosure in forcible detainer cases. Rep. Susan Tyler Whitten and George Ecklan of the Coalition for the Homeless said the bill is aimed at reducing housing barriers for Kentuckians, especially those with dismissed cases, while preserving landlords’ rights to pursue rent, collections, damages, and other legal remedies. They said the proposal was developed with input from landlords, clerks, judges, AOC, and service providers, and noted that similar laws exist in other states. Several members, including Sen. Neimes, Rep. Deetsz, Rep. Cole Carney, and Sen. Thomas, expressed support while emphasizing that the bill is narrowly tailored to dismissed cases and should not affect legitimate landlord claims; Sen. Wheeler raised concerns about cases involving settlements or delays and whether future landlords should know about them. The sponsors responded that the bill only covers dismissed actions, that dismissals require a judge’s order, and that the goal is to remove barriers created by records that remain publicly visible even when a case is resolved. The committee then took up Senate Bill 111 on juvenile justice. Commissioner Randy White, Kentucky Hospital Association President Nancy Galvanny, and Dr. Clark Lester of the University of Kentucky said the bill would require a secure state-run facility for youth with high-acuity mental health needs in detention and, until that is built, create a process with incentives for private hospitals to provide inpatient treatment with safeguards and increased compensation. They argued that detention is not an appropriate setting for severely mentally ill, violent youth and that private psychiatric hospitals often refuse these referrals or discharge them early. Dr. Lester cited recent referral data showing high denial rates for juvenile justice youth in private hospitals in August and September, often due to aggression, and described a case in which repeated placement attempts failed because of violent and self-harming behavior. The presenters said the bill is intended to fill a service gap and improve safety and outcomes for youth, staff, and hospitals, but no vote or final action on the bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So again, you know, when you have comparative data, you're able to evaluate as lay people.
• So again, you know, when you have comparative data, you're able to evaluate as lay people.
• So again, you know, when you have comparative data, you're able to evaluate as lay people.
• Again, when you have comparative data, you're able to evaluate as lay people.
• </c> required and they'd never been evaluated required and they'd never been evaluated and<01:25:45.040

Committee: Senate Human Services

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• are required to attend and participate in this program, and they do this for the screening and evaluation
• are required to attend and participate in this program, and they do this for the screening and evaluation
• </c><01:23:50.880><c> as</c><01:23:51.040><c> well</c><01:23:51.320><c> since</c> people are re-evaluated
• as well since people are re-evaluated as well since often<01:23:52.080><c> times</c><01:23:52.520><c
• </c> sure that screening and evaluation sure that screening and evaluation happen<01:24:02.040><c> in

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So if people aren't properly trained and licensed, the actual staff performing those services, how are
• It talks about who can perform an ultrasound and who can interpret an ultrasound.
• First of all, I want to point out to you that it was an informational audit and not a performance audit
• I’m just curious, was this a performance audit or was this a review?
• Such as like providing ultrasounds, prescribing medications, and performing STI testing.

Committee: House Health and Welfare

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 611 by Rep. Freeman, which would require pregnancy-related service centers that provide health care services to be licensed or, as amended, to clearly disclose that they are not a licensed medical facility regulated by the Louisiana Department of Health. Rep. Freeman and supporting witnesses argued the bill was prompted by a legislative auditor report and concerns that some centers provide ultrasounds, STI testing, pregnancy tests, and related services without clear medical oversight. The Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners’ executive director testified that interpreting ultrasounds and performing certain tests can constitute the practice of medicine, while opponents argued the centers already operate under medical directors and that the disclosure requirement was unconstitutional under the NIFLA case. The committee adopted an amendment, but after debate on the amended bill, a motion to report favorably failed on a roll call vote, and the bill was voluntarily deferred. The committee then heard House Bill 902 by Rep. Marcelle, which directs the Louisiana Department of Health to develop trauma-informed training. Supporters said the bill grew out of a task force on student behavior, mental health, and discipline, and that educators need a more consistent, evidence-based trauma-informed curriculum than what is currently available online. Some members raised concerns about cost and whether the bill would mandate new school obligations, while a witness from the Louisiana Baptist Convention opposed the measure as mission creep and argued trauma-informed care is too specialized for general teacher training. Other members supported the bill as a way to help educators identify and respond to children facing trauma. The bill was amended with technical changes and then discussed further, but the transcript ends before a final vote on HB 902 is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:34:49.919><c> by</c><00:34:50.079><c> a</c> portraying a sexual performance by a portraying a
• sexual performance by a minor,<00:34:50.560><c> but</c><00:34:50.720><c> I</c><00:34:50.879><c> don't
• Um, yes, we have possession, viewing, manner portraying a sexual performance by a minor, and then we
• </c><00:38:56.720><c> and</c><00:38:57.040><c> what's</c><00:38:57.280><c> added</c> performance by a
• by a minor and then sexual performance by a minor and then we<00:39:54.880><c> have</c><00:39:55.440

Committee: House Judiciary

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But we do take disciplining and performance managing our employees seriously.
• </c><00:18:40.640><c> is</c><00:18:40.840><c> not</c><00:18:41.240><c> meeting</c> where their performance
• is not meeting where their performance is not meeting our our our expectations<00:18:43.919><c> Mr</
• If an employee is having repeat performance issues, the what progressive discipline means is that it
• issues the what Progressive Performance issues the what Progressive discipline<00:21:35.440><c> means

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I just wanted to know that in this bill, it changes the university's performance-based metrics related
• In the bill on lines 252, it starts that the State University System Performance-Based Incentives shall
• , shall be awarded to the state using performance-based metrics adopted by the Board of Governors.
• My bill does not address performance-based funding. The 95% addresses preeminent funding.
• Speech and debate—I don't think I told people I had a school for the performing arts.

Committee: House Education & Employment Committee

Summary: The committee first took up PCS for CS for HB 1279, a higher education bill focused on Florida’s preeminent universities. The sponsor said the measure would increase access for Florida students, strengthen accountability and transparency, update accreditation references, adjust performance metrics, and address issues such as GPA weighting, engineering credit-hour differences, and certain fee-waiver and dental-program provisions. Members raised questions about the 95% Florida-resident enrollment target, possible funding impacts, Pell Grant metrics, and whether the bill would affect community college pathways; the sponsor said the bill was aimed at first-time-in-college students and that the 95% standard would be measured on a three-year rolling average. After an amendment removing an adjustment to the four-year graduation metric was adopted, the bill was reported favorably by a 17-2 vote. The committee then heard PCS for CS for HB 1059, which would strengthen speech and debate education by designating the Florida Debate Initiative as the statewide organization, supporting coach and judge training, statewide data collection, tournaments, and a Florida Speech and Debate Week. The sponsor and several students and advocates testified that speech and debate builds confidence, civics knowledge, leadership, and opportunities for English learners and other students, with multiple speakers describing how the program changed their lives. Members from both parties spoke strongly in support, and the bill was reported favorably without opposition. Finally, the committee considered PCS for HB 725 on political activity at public institutions of higher education. The sponsor said the bill would standardize campus policies, require notice to students and employees about free-expression and political-campaign rules, and align state practice with federal guidelines while preserving free speech and nonpartisan voter engagement. An opponent argued the bill could create barriers to civic engagement and student organizing, while supporters said it would clarify existing rules and prevent institutions from favoring one viewpoint over another. The sponsor closed by emphasizing that the bill was about information and neutrality rather than restricting speech.

Transcript Highlights:

• collegiate event that involves a college located within Washington is permitted, but wagering on the performance
• or non-performance of an individual athlete that is enrolled in a college is prohibited.
• ... ...on individual prop betting, so wagering on a specific player's performance remains in the bill
• We also track relative to lodging performance, international tourism, and jobs.
• It has performed well, delivered... ...and the industry-supported self-assessment.

Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 6137 on sports wagering. Staff explained that the bill would allow wagering on collegiate events involving Washington colleges, but would continue to prohibit bets on the performance of individual college athletes. Tribal representatives from the Jamestown S’Klallam, Puyallup, and Kalispel tribes testified in support, saying the bill would keep wagering within the regulated tribal marketplace, protect integrity, and help smaller tribal casinos participate through a hub-and-spoke model. University of Washington and Washington State University representatives supported the ban on individual prop bets and emphasized student-athlete safety, while WSU also argued the bill would expand exposure to harassment and online abuse. No vote was taken. The committee then heard Senate Bill 6079, which would create the Strengthen Washington Homes wildfire mitigation grant program. Staff said the bill would fund grants for wildfire-hardening homes to IBHS standards, authorize pilot projects, and prohibit insurers from using wildfire risk to disqualify homes that meet the standards. Insurance Commissioner Patty Kuder and Senator Marcus Riccelli supported the bill, arguing that wildfire losses and non-renewals are increasing and that upfront mitigation is cheaper than recovery. Local officials and advocates from Medical Lake, Washington Realtors, and climate and wildfire groups also supported the measure. Insurance industry representatives supported the mitigation goals but objected to the bill’s requirement that insurers provide coverage based on IBHS designation and to using the commissioner’s regulatory account as a funding source, saying underwriting still needs to consider broader risk factors. No action was taken. The committee next held a work session and public hearing on Senate Bill 6061, which would create a tourism self-supported assessment program. State of Washington Tourism, the Washington Wine Commission, the Washington Hospitality Association, the Brewers Guild, the Port of Seattle, and rural economic development representatives said the state’s tourism program is underfunded and that an industry-led assessment could provide a stable, competitive funding source. They said the model would be governed by a ratepayer oversight board, subject to ratification, and could generate significant visitor spending and tax revenue over time. Some testimony raised concerns about the scope of eligible businesses and the bill’s references to other industries, but supporters said friendly amendments would refine those details. The committee then heard Senate Bill 5844 on self-storage rental agreements, which would allow electronic agreements, clarify acceptance by continued occupancy, and create a uniform process for termination or nonrenewal for nonpayment or nonmonetary defaults. Self-storage operators supported the bill as a modernization measure that would improve safety and consistency, and no vote was taken on any of the bills heard.

Transcript Highlights:

• So it's not just about getting the personnel to perform the tox analysis and being able to testify to
• When testing is performed by an out-of-state laboratory private clinic that refuses to participate in
• Miriam Gordon continued: “I have performed the court-appointed duties of court visitor and guardian ad
• We haven't heard today about our local law enforcement officers performing tactics in this manner.
• We haven't heard today about our local law enforcement officers performing tactics in this manner.

Bills: SB5865 , SB5880 , SB5912 , SB5837 , SB5855

Committee: Senate Law & Justice

Keywords: garnishment, debt, form standardization, financial protection, legal processes, toxicology testing, laboratories, accreditation, public health, standards, indigent defense, task force, criminal justice, legal aid, public defense, guardianship, conservatorship, protective arrangement, protective arrangements, supported decision-making

Transcript Highlights:

• It's about performance and fairness and good governance.
• Mississippi performs best when every qualified citizen has a fair opportunity to participate in state
• It's about performance<00:13:43.200><c> and</c><00:13:43.440><c> fairness</c><00:13:43.839><c> and</c
• ><00:13:44.160><c> good</c> performance and fairness and good performance and fairness and good governance
• Mississippi performs best governance.

Keywords: MS Senate Floor - 13 February, 2026; 9:00 AM, 925, all