Transcript Highlights:

• The governor justified his veto of the repeal bill by claiming that free kill families can still sue
• Last session, a clean repeal passed both chambers because there isn't one.
• Last session, a clean repeal passed both chambers with overwhelming bipartisan support until, in the
• A further disproportionate increase in the frequency of these high-severity claims and the resulting
• medical malpractice claim takes 4.3 years to resolve, the full impact of this policy change may not

Summary: The Judiciary Committee met to consider HB 6003, a bill to repeal Florida’s “free kill” law that limits certain survivors’ ability to recover non-economic damages in medical negligence wrongful death cases. The sponsor, Rep. Trabulsy, said the bill would restore access to the courts for a small class of families and noted the measure passed both chambers last year before being vetoed by the governor. She and supporters framed the bill as a fairness and constitutional issue, while opponents argued repeal would increase malpractice exposure, insurance costs, and pressure on physician access, especially in high-risk specialties and rural areas. Public testimony was sharply divided. Supporters included family members who described deaths they said were caused by medical negligence and who argued the current law denies accountability and equal treatment based on marital status or whether a decedent had minor children. Opponents included the Florida Hospital Association, Florida Medical Association, Florida Chamber, U.S. Chamber, Florida Insurance Council, and other health care and business groups, who warned that repeal could worsen already high malpractice premiums, contribute to physician shortages, and destabilize access to care. Several speakers on both sides discussed possible caps on non-economic damages as a compromise, though the bill itself was presented as a clean repealer with no amendments. During debate, several members spoke in support, emphasizing equal access to the courts and rejecting the idea that the law should treat some families differently from others. Opponents of the bill argued that the current system helps preserve market stability and that liability concerns, not the free kill law, are driving provider departures. After closing remarks from the sponsor, the committee voted 15 yeas and 1 nay to report HB 6003 favorably.

Transcript Highlights:

• These claims are largely unfounded.
• It should also exempt purely illustrative or thematic figures that make no claim about the product.
• We'd love to see it cleaned up and hopefully more conversations are held.
• It just got cleaned up recently. I mean, they didn't even clean it up quickly.
• And, frankly, with respect to the cleanup, I mean, who else should clean up the park?

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills, beginning with SB 16, which would require county behavioral health directors to create clear pathways for clinicians to be authorized to initiate 5150 involuntary holds. The author and supporters argued the bill would reduce reliance on law enforcement and create more consistent crisis response standards statewide, while county behavioral health directors opposed it as an unfunded mandate that could increase law enforcement involvement and create implementation burdens. Members raised questions about county costs and funding, but the author emphasized the bill’s role in building a more clinical response system. SB 561 would require public guardians to acknowledge conservatorship referrals, make determinations within a reasonable time, and provide status updates on request. Supporters said the bill would reduce delays that leave vulnerable adults in limbo, while the opposition from public guardian representatives was removed after amendments. SB 381 drew extensive public testimony in support; it would allow California-born adoptees, and descendants of deceased adoptees, access to original birth certificates, with a nonbinding contact preference form for birth parents. Supporters framed the bill as a matter of dignity, identity, and health, and there was no formal opposition on the record. The committee also discussed SB 880, which would give tenants and prospective owner-occupants notice and a first opportunity to make an offer when institutional investors sell certain homes. Supporters said it would expand homeownership opportunities and preserve neighborhood stability, while opponents warned about conflicts with federal law, bundled-sale restrictions, and impacts on build-to-rent and affordable housing projects. Members and the author discussed possible amendments to address those concerns. SB 1238 would impose a duty of care and additional transparency requirements on HOA managers and boards; supporters said it would protect homeowners from mismanagement, while the main opposition argued the duty should remain contractual and could increase litigation. Finally, SB 423 would require disclosure of emergency-service records related to private detention facilities, and SB 28 would make changes to the CARE Court process, including a statewide ombudsperson and expanded oversight; both drew support and opposition, with concerns focused on transparency, privacy, implementation, and the balance between treatment and coercion. SB 574, discussed at the end, would require disclosure and human oversight for AI use in courts and legal practice and create a complaint process for ADR providers, with the State Bar noting requested amendments related to complaint handling and confidentiality.

Transcript Highlights:

• State-only claiming adjustments.
• that the state has had to pay costs for these claims.
• Clean, they will be looking to Medi-Cal.
• Clean, a non-union company, began operating in the stores and offered to rehire Mr.
• Clean, they will be looking to Medi-Cal.

Summary: The subcommittee heard a lengthy Department of Health Care Services presentation on the governor’s Medi-Cal budget, including a $229.1 billion total-funds proposal, projected Medi-Cal enrollment declines as redeterminations continue, and several major cost drivers such as managed care growth, Medicare-related costs, pharmacy spending, and changes tied to federal policy. Members focused heavily on the elimination of Prop. 56 dental supplemental payments beginning July 1, 2026, questioning the likely impact on provider participation and utilization. DHCS said it is completing the required rate reduction/access analysis for CMS, has been holding stakeholder meetings and issuing provider bulletins, but could not yet quantify the real-world effect. The committee also discussed a $50 million savings proposal tied to new hospice utilization management authority and asked about possible effects on emergency dental care and provider participation. The hearing then moved through the November 2025 family health estimate and several county and program administration issues, including CCS, GHPP, and Every Woman Counts. DHCS said family health costs are rising despite slight caseload declines because of higher utilization and medical costs, and members raised concerns about CCS website accessibility, county administrative funding, and the transition of youth aging out of CCS. The department said most CCS beneficiaries are also on Medi-Cal, that counties have long raised funding concerns, and that it had clarified use of maintenance-and-operations dollars to address some county workload issues. Members also asked about Every Woman Counts potentially seeing higher demand as Medi-Cal changes take effect; DHCS said that is possible and that the program has multiple funding sources including General Fund. A major portion of the hearing focused on provider taxes and federal changes under H.R. 1, especially the Medi-Cal managed care organization tax and the hospital quality assurance fee. DHCS explained that H.R. 1 restricts new or increased health care-related taxes, phases down allowable tax levels over time, and tightens “generally redistributive” rules, which could sharply reduce the state’s ability to use the MCO tax for Medi-Cal financing. Members asked whether the Legislature could amend Prop. 35 or whether voters would need to act; DHCS said a three-fourths legislative amendment may be possible if it aligns with the measure’s purpose, but the department is still evaluating options. The committee also discussed hospital financing, with DHCS describing recent increases in state-directed payments and the effect of H.R. 1 in capping those payments at Medicare levels, and the LAO noting the tradeoff between preserving provider taxes and maintaining Medi-Cal funding. The subcommittee also reviewed a series of DHCS budget change proposals and trailer bill items, including managed care final-rule implementation, managed care operations, a hospital value strategy, a one-year extension of skilled nursing facility financing, long-term care payment transparency, and interoperability/prior authorization requirements. Members repeatedly questioned the use of limited-term versus permanent positions, the overlap among proposals, and the timing of new financing reforms. DHCS said the SNF extension would preserve current workforce standards, sanctions, growth limits, and the SNF quality assurance fee while the department develops a broader 2027-28 redesign. No votes were taken; items were repeatedly held open for later action. Covered California then presented on the expiration of the federal enhanced premium tax credit and the resulting affordability crisis. The agency said Californians will lose about $2.5 billion in premium assistance for 2026, average premiums could nearly double for many enrollees, and as many as 400,000 people could eventually leave marketplace coverage. Open enrollment ended with 1.9 million sign-ups, down 3% from the prior year, with especially steep declines among middle-income consumers and increased movement into bronze plans. Covered California said the state’s $190 million affordability subsidy is helping lower-income enrollees retain coverage, but cannot fully replace the lost federal assistance. Members also asked about the Health Care Affordability Reserve Fund, repayment of loans from that fund, the status of federal review of California’s essential health benefits benchmark, and implementation of the new gender-affirming care benefit under AB 144.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:59:18.800><c> asylum</c> is when you come here and claim asylum is when you come here and claim
• We're talking about people you say they got here and they claimed asylum.
• We're talking about people you say they got here and they claimed asylum.
• We're talking about people you say they got here and they claimed asylum.
• We're talking about people you say they got here and they claimed asylum.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• made as expenses are incurred, limiting the availability of punitive damages in medical malpractice claims
• , limiting attorney fees in malpractice claims.
• title, is ordered not printed, and referred to the House Rules Committee. and an alleged squatter, claim
• of Article 2 to provide the people of the state with environmental rights, including the right to clean
• of Article 2 to provide the people of the state with environmental rights, including the right to clean

Bills: HB1

Keywords: feed bill, legislative appropriations, legislative branch, New Mexico Legislature, general fund, legislative council service, legislative finance committee, legislative education study committee, house chief clerk, senate chief clerk, per diem, mileage, session expenses, interim committees, district staff, capitol complex, capital outlay data system, legislative processing system, redistricting, census redistricting

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill seems to me like an attempt to clean up a mess, which will no doubt cost taxpayers.
• I'm in the trenches working with clients to document claims.
• This client had not used their PIP claim in over a year.
• This client had not used their PIP claim in over a year.
• PIP claim over a year. This is real work that takes real time, time away from patient care.

Bills: HB1496, HB2182, HB2196, HB2242

Keywords: patients' rights, healthcare information, medical confidentiality, health data security, healthcare access, abortion, medications, reproductive health, access, healthcare, PANDA, PANS, treatment access, mental health, legislation, preventive services, state authority, definitions clarification, public health, 904

Summary: The committee heard House Bill 1496, which would cap charges for electronically stored medical records at $50 for certain recipients, including patients, their representatives, attorneys, and some advocates, while changing attorney-fee language to apply to a prevailing patient. The sponsor and supporters said current law allows excessive per-page charges that can run into thousands of dollars and create barriers to justice, especially when patients need records for legal claims or disability-related matters. Opponents, including hospitals, home care providers, and records vendors, argued that third-party record requests are labor-intensive, privacy-sensitive, and often involve decades of records, and that a $50 cap would not cover costs and could burden smaller providers. The bill remained under public hearing with testimony continuing when the transcript ended. House Bill 2182 would change how the Department of Corrections handles a stockpile of mifepristone and misoprostol by removing the requirement that the medications be sold at cost plus a $5 fee, allowing payment to be optional, directing DOC to coordinate with the Department of Health, and broadening the language to cover the full spectrum of reproductive care. Supporters, including the prime sponsor, the governor’s office, DOH, the Women’s Commission, clinicians, and abortion-rights advocates, said the bill would help Washington distribute existing stockpiled medication before expiration and reduce barriers to abortion and miscarriage care, especially given federal litigation and access challenges. Opponents objected on moral, fiscal, and legal grounds, arguing the state should not facilitate abortion drugs or shift costs to taxpayers. Public testimony on the bill was then closed. House Bill 2196 would require fully insured private health plans to cover IVIG for PANS and PANDAS under specified conditions, beginning with plans issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2027, and would bar denials based on prior treatment, age, out-of-state care when unavailable in Washington, or coverage limits inconsistent with treatment guidelines. The sponsor and families testified that children with these conditions are often misdiagnosed, suffer severe symptoms, and can improve dramatically with IVIG after other treatments fail; physicians said the therapy can be life-changing and is already covered by Medicaid. Health plan representatives opposed the mandate, warning that IVIG is expensive and that new benefit requirements add to already rising premiums. Public testimony was closed after hearing from both sides. House Bill 2242 would shift immunization recommendations and related preventive-service coverage from federal entities to the Washington Department of Health, while preserving no-cost coverage for preventive services and vaccines in state-regulated plans and updating the date used for coverage standards. Supporters included the governor, insurance commissioner, DOH, public health officials, pediatricians, family physicians, and health plans, who said the bill would preserve access to vaccines and other preventive care amid federal instability, maintain transparency, and protect coverage for services such as screenings and immunizations. They emphasized rising vaccine-preventable diseases and said the bill does not create new vaccine mandates. A question from a legislator about implications for schools and daycares was answered by staff and the governor’s office, who said existing school vaccine rules and opt-outs would not change. Public testimony on HB 2242 was then closed.

Transcript Highlights:

• as automatically, we call them a clean claim, a claim that can go through the automated process without
• of automatically, we call them a clean claim, a claim that can go through the automated process without
• claim.
• Now, 83% of PFL claims are filed online.
• The effort known as the Integrated Claims Management System will make it easier to manage claims, share

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So that TOR claim that TOR claim act.
• </c> governed by the TOR Claim Act. governed by the TOR Claim Act.
• </c> can be governed by the TOR Claim Act. can be governed by the TOR Claim Act.
• </c><00:20:43.440><c> So</c> claims act. So claims act.
• </c> Claims Act. Claims Act.

Keywords: Judiciary, Division A - Room 216, 29 January, 2026; 3:00 PM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So do we claim the land that is on with the Spirit Lake Casino?
• They've cleaned it out one time, the cattails.
• You guys should be able to clean it out.
• So claim to the lake bed. How did the state come to claim the lake bed in Devil's Lake?
• Its claim to the inundated patent parcels.

Summary: The committee opened its third interim meeting with roll call, approved the November 13, 2025 minutes, and the chair reviewed prior committee work, including a denied request for a fertilizer-capacity study and a planned later discussion of the Union Pacific/Norfolk Southern merger issue. Commissioner Doug Goring then presented Department of Agriculture updates on uncrewed aerial systems grants to detect noxious weeds, the state’s irrigation potential, the low-carbon fuels program for ethanol plants, the Environmental Impact Mitigation Fund, model zoning ordinances for animal feeding operations, and fertilizer production and supply in North Dakota. Members asked about funding sources, fertilizer storage and availability, natural gas and water needs for future fertilizer plants, and how the model zoning website would help counties and townships apply setback and odor tools. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on the Department of Water Resources’ economic analysis tool for water conveyance and flood-related projects. Dr. Dwayne Poole explained that the department is proposing changes to better account for end-of-useful-life conditions and updated hydrologic data, while still limiting the model to direct, demonstrable costs and benefits. He said the goal is to make the analysis more realistic and consistent without changing statute, and he provided examples of how project benefits could change as drains age or as rainfall and flood data evolve. Committee members and water-user representatives generally supported continued work on the proposal, while raising concerns about downstream impacts, closed-basin projects, and whether the changes would meaningfully affect project approvals. The committee then heard from John Paskowski, state engineer, on Devil’s Lake, the West End and East End outlets, and the Tolna Coulee control structure. He reviewed lake history, outlet capacities, sulfate and downstream flow limits, and explained that the control structure is intended to prevent a catastrophic uncontrolled release by slowing erosion and head cutting. Members asked about water quality trends, the length of the downstream flow constraint, and whether the Tolna Coulee area had been studied for possible natural overflow or silt buildup. The discussion emphasized ongoing flooding concerns, mitigation for affected landowners, and the need to balance outlet operations with downstream water quality and infrastructure protection.

Transcript Highlights:

• This has increased from $612 per claim in 2020.
• with emergency room claims rose 15%.
• claims process with regard to screenings or the claims process in general.
• leading to rushed decisions or inadequate claim evaluations.
• It's those kinds of cases, but all of these claims are negligence claims.

Summary: The Budget Committee met with a quorum and took up several bills. HB 677, relating to state-covered fertility preservation for employees undergoing cancer treatment, was introduced as coverage for egg and sperm preservation for up to three years, with an estimated fiscal impact of about $813,000. After brief questions and no public testimony or amendments, the bill passed unanimously and was reported favorably. The committee then considered CS/HB 59, which would reform Florida’s wrongful incarceration compensation process by extending the filing deadline from 90 days to two years, removing the clean-hands requirement, and allowing exonerees to choose between the state compensation process and a civil lawsuit; it was supported by the City of Flagler Beach and passed unanimously. CS/HB 1313, which recreates the Resilient Florida Trust Fund in the Department of Environmental Protection before its scheduled termination in 2025, also passed unanimously after supportive testimony from advocacy groups. The committee received a lengthy presentation from the Department of Management Services on the State Group Insurance Program and the recent Revenue Estimating Conference. The presentation covered enrollment, revenues and expenditures, rising medical and pharmacy costs, emergency room utilization, GLP-1 drug spending, and options for tighter formulary and utilization management. Members asked about ER cost growth, GLP-1 coverage and copays, PBM oversight and potential conflicts, avoidable ER visits, cancer screening claims, dental and vision costs, specialty drug biosimilars, and possible savings from more restrictive pharmacy models. DMS said it would follow up on several questions and noted ongoing work on cancer coordination, preventive screening, biomarker testing, and a proposed member-facing benefits platform. The committee also heard extensive testimony on HB 301, which would raise sovereign immunity caps from $200,000 per person and $300,000 per incident to $1 million and $3 million, align limitations periods with private claims, and allow government entities to settle above the caps without a claims bill. Local governments, school-related entities, and county and city associations opposed the bill, warning of major fiscal impacts, higher insurance costs, and pressure on services; several speakers urged smaller increases or a tiered approach. Proponents, including families affected by catastrophic injury or death, argued the current caps are too low and the claims bill process is inefficient and unfair. After debate, the bill passed on a recorded vote, with some members voting no, and was reported favorably.

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, things like cleanings and x-rays are available through Medicaid.
• It's a 53 percent increase in the number of claims we've processed over that time.
• claims.
• We enjoy that fight, and we self-monitor ourselves on that timeliness of claims.
• That's added to the number of claims we're able to process.

Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services heard a base budget overview for the 2025-26 fiscal year, which was presented as a $46.8 billion starting point for the silo. Staff explained that HHS accounts for about half of the state base budget and roughly 36% of general revenue, with AHCA and Medicaid making up the largest share. The committee then reviewed the PACE program for the elderly, including its eligibility, service model, growth in applications, slot funding and reversions, and the agency’s plan to move from the federal three-way agreement to a more detailed two-party contract to improve accountability, transparency, and reporting. Members raised concerns about unfilled slots, reversions, rural access, and the need for clearer return-on-investment data; the agency said it would follow up on some of those questions. The committee also heard from the Agency for Persons with Disabilities on its statewide dental program. APD described its history of appropriations, the failed January 2024 solicitation, and a new up-to-$11.5 million solicitation focused on preventive care, community partnerships, teledentistry, and coordination with other services. Members questioned overlap with Medicaid dental coverage, the effect of Medicaid unwinding on APD clients, and whether state dollars were duplicating federally supported services; APD said it tries to act as payer of last resort and that services would continue during procurement. Public testimony from an APD stakeholder and the Florida Dental Association emphasized Medicaid eligibility problems for waiver recipients, low reimbursement rates, limited access to anesthesia and hospital-based dental care, and concerns that proposed Medicaid changes could reduce access for special-needs patients. The Department of Veterans’ Affairs then presented on state veterans service officers and benefits assistance. FDVA highlighted its role in helping veterans access federal benefits, reporting about $27.9 billion in federal dollars flowing into Florida and a high return on state investment. The department said it has increased outreach, claims processing, and services, and has trained staff to identify mental health concerns through its Overwatch program. In response to questions, FDVA discussed plans to expand adult day health care at a new veterans nursing home and possibly at existing locations with additional state funding. At the end of the meeting, the committee completed its presentations and adjourned without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• from renewable generators who don't claim their renewable energy certificates.
• </c> utilities are able to claim utilities are able to claim the the the renewable<00:03:42.720><c> energy
• </c> renewable generators who don't claim renewable generators who don't claim their<00:03:53.840><c>
• I'm Sam Evans Brown, executive director of Clean Energy New Hampshire.
• We've been Clean Energy New Hampshire.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 219, which would revise the renewable portfolio standard by changing several class definitions, eliminating Class 2, lowering the utility obligation for Class 1 thermal renewable energy certificates from 2.2% to 1.7%, and adjusting alternative compliance payments. Representative Vose said the bill would save ratepayers an estimated $5.7 million annually, arguing that Class 2 is already saturated and that the changes would not materially affect renewable energy development. Members questioned the fiscal impact, with an amended fiscal note cited as showing a $1.2 million reduction in general fund revenue, and some members raised concerns that the bill could weaken one of the remaining incentives for renewable investment. The committee also reviewed the bill’s history, including that it had been added to HB 2 and then removed in conference committee. No vote was taken in the work session. The committee then heard House Bill 164, concerning local records retention and the creation of a local records manager position. Secretary of State David Scanlan testified that the position has existed in statute for years but has never been funded, and said the need has grown as records management has become more digital and ADA accessibility has become more important. He described the bill as a way to help towns preserve and digitize records, especially for smaller communities with limited resources, while keeping records locally when possible. Members asked about the fiscal note, the potential cost of a public website and storage system, and whether the state could start by funding the position alone; the secretary said the staffing cost estimate remained accurate but that storage costs could rise over time. Several members expressed support and suggested further discussion with the Department of Information or other agencies. The work session was then closed without action. Finally, the committee opened House Bill 365, which would provide proof of U.S. citizenship assistance for indigent voters. Secretary Scanlan said the bill is intended to help voters comply with the new voter registration documentation requirements by allowing the state to verify eligibility through federal, private, and other state databases, and by providing vouchers to cover the cost of obtaining documents such as birth certificates. He compared the proposal to the earlier voter ID law, which he said was successfully implemented with accommodations for voters lacking acceptable ID. Members asked how “indigent” would be defined and how the process would work for out-of-state-born applicants; the secretary said indigency would likely be based on a voter’s statement of inability to pay and that the state would help identify where to obtain records and, if necessary, verify them through outside databases. The discussion continued as the transcript ended, with no vote recorded.

Transcript Highlights:

• 422,200 claims of the marriage credit.
• 422,200 claims of the marriage credit.
• </c> claims for the marriage credit in 2021. claims for the marriage credit in 2021.
• Based on the claims for the residential clean energy credit at the federal level, the LBO estimates that
• Based on the claims for the residential clean energy credit at the federal level, the LBO estimates that

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Okay, this bill is clean up on aisle three.
• If an insurance carrier makes a determination on a presented claim and they have a right to review claims
• It's, um, handling or adjusting claims.
• It's, um, handling or adjusting claims.
• </c> I I think someone who is a claims I I think someone who is a claims adjuster,<03:47:29.600><c> for

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Beyond cleaning up food sources for rodents, a simultaneous step is banning the use of escars in our
• You have a nice clean table. Thank you. Great. Good afternoon. My name is Michelle Grisenden.
• I have personal experience to support this claim.
• So what is the benefit of cleaning this up? Picking up trash and cleaning up...
• The benefit of cleaning this up is that picking up trash and cleaning up properties reduces pest control

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources held a hybrid hearing on a large slate of bills focused on pesticides, pollinators, rodenticides, mosquito control, invasive species, and local authority over pesticide regulation. Chair Becca Rausch set strict two-minute testimony limits due to the very large number of speakers. Early testimony from Senator Moore and Representative Hawkins strongly supported a bill to restrict second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides, citing harms to wildlife, pets, and public health, and noting that California has already adopted a similar model. Testimony also supported a Lowell home rule petition to allow the city to prohibit or restrict these rodenticides, with local officials describing documented raptor poisonings and municipal efforts to phase out use on city property. A major portion of the hearing focused on pollinator protection and neonicotinoid-treated seeds. Witnesses from environmental groups, conservation organizations, academics, and beekeepers argued that neonics harm bees and other beneficial insects, contaminate soil and water, and provide little or no economic benefit in most corn and soybean fields. Several speakers pointed to New York, Vermont, and Quebec as models for restricting treated seeds, and one panel cited research showing only a small percentage of fields benefit economically from the treatments. Support was also voiced for a bill establishing an ecologically based mosquito management program, with advocates criticizing aerial and truck spraying and urging non-chemical, locally tailored approaches. Other testimony supported bills to reform the pesticide board and pesticide regulation process, to give vulnerable municipalities more local control over pesticide use, to protect schoolchildren from pesticides on school grounds, and to respond to invasive species through a centralized state office, coordinator, strategic plan, and trust fund. Many speakers, including representatives from Mass Audubon, MSPCA, the Xerces Society, the Sierra Club, watershed groups, and local wildlife rehabilitators, described impacts on hawks, owls, pets, fish, and broader ecosystems. No votes were taken during the hearing, and committee members generally asked few questions, with the hearing remaining in testimony mode throughout.

Transcript Highlights:

• Under our constitution to clean air, clean water, and clean soil, not just now, but for generations to
• We need clean air to breathe as well and clean soil to grow our food.
• So, Madam Chair, Representative, I'm wondering regarding clean, for example, clean air, clean water.
• air, clean water, and clean lands.
• land, and clean water.

Transcript Highlights:

• to</c><00:05:22.440><c> breathe</c> to have clean water clean air to breathe to have clean water clean
• Hearing none. clean environment is much more important clean environment is much more important than<
• </c><00:10:26.040><c> air</c> ensure people's rights to clean air ensure people's rights to clean air
• air and just, for instance, clean air or clean water, because we have it in statute?
• What is theoretically clean air?

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Agriculture and Environment hearing on January 27, 2025, took up multiple measures, beginning with a proposed constitutional amendment, HB 559, to recognize a right to clean water and air, a healthful environment, climate, native ecosystems, and beaches. The Attorney General’s Office testified with concerns that the amendment’s broad language could create challenges for future legislatures and environmental enforcement, while the Climate Commission and DLNR supported it. Environmental and advocacy groups, including Climate Protectors Hawaii, 350 Hawaii, Greenpeace Hawaii, and others, strongly supported the measure, arguing it would strengthen decision-making and protect Hawaii’s natural resources. Committee members raised questions about how the amendment would interact with existing constitutional protections and recent litigation, and the AG’s office said the proposal could lead to broad judicial interpretation and possible liability issues. The hearing then moved on without a recorded vote on this bill. The committee next heard SB 552, which would establish a healthy soils program in the Department of Agriculture and require annual reporting and funding. The Climate Change Commission supported the bill, and the Department of Agriculture said it stood on its submitted testimony but noted existing commissions and the greenhouse gas sequestration task force already address similar objectives, suggesting SB 552 may duplicate current efforts. Agricultural and environmental advocates, including the Hawaii Farmers Union, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and others, supported the concept of a consolidated healthy soils program, saying it would better organize existing efforts, improve access for producers, and support conservation practices. The Agribusiness Development Corporation said it would support either DOA or ADC administering the program, and committee discussion focused on implementation, program overlap, and whether the bill should better integrate existing compost reimbursement and related efforts. The final measure discussed in the excerpt was SB 678, which would create an Agricultural Development Food Security Special Fund, dedicate a portion of the environmental response, energy, and food security tax to it, and appropriate funds equal to 3% of the state budget for agriculture. The Department of Agriculture strongly supported the bill, saying the funding would align with its goals and help support farmers and ranchers. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii and the Department of Budget and Finance raised concerns that the proposed special fund may not meet statutory criteria. Farm and industry groups generally supported the measure but suggested changes, including adding uses related to local food sourcing, distribution, and biosecurity. Committee members questioned the scale of the appropriation, noting it could amount to roughly $250 million and a major increase in DOA’s budget, and discussed whether the department could realistically implement such a large program. The hearing ended with testimony counts noted for the measures heard, and the chair indicated the committee would reconvene later for any unfinished business.

Transcript Highlights:

• SB 1064, Clean Trucks Testing. The motion is do pass. We will substitute the roll call from SB 894.
• SB 1146, Advertisement Claims Health Related Products. The motion is do pass. Roll call vote.
• SB 1049, Health Claims Reimbursement. The motion is due pass.
• The motion is due pass as amended per author to clarify license classification and date of claims.
• The motion is due pass as amended per author to clarify license classification and date of claims.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Some house cleaning: we are going to hold House Bill 2118.
• has long been established but lacked a definition of the term firefighter, leading to a denial of a claim
• House Bill 2138 cleans up the statute and restores its original legislative intent, and we ask for your
• Unfortunately, this was not how the workers' compensation claim played out.
• His claim was denied due to the insurance company His claim was denied due to the insurance company exploiting

Bills: HB2091, HB2118, HB2122, HB2138

Keywords: insurance, financial surveillance, regulations, assessments, Arizona Revised Statutes, mobile food vendors, licensure, food safety, statewide regulations, health standards, zoning, temporary vendors, technical registration, engineering, architect, land surveyor, reciprocity, endorsement, qualification standards, firefighter

Transcript Highlights:

• Trent Lang, president of the California Clean Money Campaign.
• Trent Lang, California Clean Money Campaign. We haven't taken a position on S.J.R. 18 yet.
• Dora Rose, League of Women Voters of California, we have similar concerns to California Clean Money.
• Trent Lang, California Clean Money Campaign, strong support. Good morning. Good morning.
• Trent Lang, California Clean Money Campaign, in strong support.

Keywords: 988, house, all