Video & Transcript : 'sensitive discussions' :
Page 385 of 500
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Children and Family Law (05/08/2025)
Children and Family Law
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm here today to discuss a serious issue our family has run into.
- So I think we discussed this enough. Uh, this is another one.
- So if you want to discussed in the room.
- I think we discussed it.
- </c> discuss? Nope. All right. We are journ. discuss? Nope. All right. We are journ.
Committee:
Senate Children and Family Law
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session 5/5/25 - Part 2
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> discussion about it uh as we go forward. discussion about it uh as we go forward.
- Any further discussion to the amendment? Representative West: No further discussion.
- Further discussion to the Third reading. Further discussion to the bill.
- Any further discussion?
- Any further discussion to the Speaker. Any further discussion to the amendment?
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session-Day 13, February 24, 2026-AM
Wyoming House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> forward discussion. Thank you Mr. forward discussion. Thank you Mr. Speaker.
- We uh a good discussed yesterday.
- Any discussion on the bill?
- </c><01:46:26.080><c> Discussion</c> Any discussion on the bill?
- Discussion Any discussion on the bill? Discussion on<01:46:26.719><c> the</c><01:46:26.880><c> bill.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Rules and Administration - Subcommittee on Ethical Conduct - Part 1 - 05/05/25
Rules and Administration - Subcommittee on Ethical Conduct
Transcript Highlights:
- So, just as we continue discussions today, there's been a lot of discussion about Senate Rule 56.4, but
- , there's been a lot of discussions today, there's been a lot of discussion<01:05:00.720><c> about</c
- </c> can just kind of focus our discussions can just kind of focus our discussions today<01:05:16.559
- </c><01:28:08.000><c> here,</c> we're getting into discussion here, we're getting into discussion here
- </c><01:37:43.760><c> matters</c> Inc. without having to discuss matters Inc. without having to discuss
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> forward this concept and discussion. forward this concept and discussion.
- A very different uh discussion.
- </c> arguments and discussions about that. arguments and discussions about that.
- But I do appreciate the discussion.
- . discussion. discussion.
Committee:
Senate Taxes
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Any further discussion?
- Any further discussion?
- </c><00:41:33.280><c> tonight</c> look forward to the discussion tonight look forward to the discussion
- <01:47:00.920><c> this</c> discussion this discussion this evening<01:47:03.000><c> I</c><01:47:03.400
- Is there any discussion? Seeing no further discussion, the clerk will take the role. [Music] Role.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Housing and Homelessness Prevention - 02/19/26
Housing and Homelessness Prevention
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:03:02.959><c> how</c> but we are here to hear and discuss how but we are here to hear and discuss
- </c> this moves forward, uh, discussing this moves forward, uh, discussing making<00:21:04.400><c> sure
- </c> before we move to member discussion? before we move to member discussion?
- </c><00:42:55.040><c> this</c><00:42:55.440><c> bill,</c> to discuss this bill, to discuss this bill,
- We were just discussing hard choice.
Committee:
Senate Housing and Homelessness Prevention
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- Any discussion?
- Any<01:40:28.080><c> discussion?</c> Any discussion? Any discussion?
- Further discussion.
- there any discussion?
- Is there any further discussion? discussion? discussion? Representative<01:45:18.320><c> Braden.
Committee:
House Education
Keywords:
education, cell phones, smart devices, school policy, student conduct, school property, rental fees, youth activities, education policy, Wyoming legislature, teacher licensure, teacher mobility, interstate compact, education compact, licensure reciprocity, reciprocal certification, teacher certification, professional teaching standards board, out-of-state teachers, military spouse
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Children and Family Law (05/06/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- But that again, whether they discuss it with their friends or whether they discuss it with an adult,
- those discussions need to be a part of the discussion of the home life.
- </c> discussion of the home life. discussion of the home life.
- </c> discuss or report psychological issues. discuss or report psychological issues.
- Any further discussion? Any further discussion? Representative Raymond.
Summary:
The committee met in executive session on Senate Bill 72, a parental rights in education measure, and considered an amendment offered by Representative Raymond. Raymond explained that his changes were intended to narrow the bill so it would not force schools to act as “surveillance operatives” for parents, especially regarding older students, and to avoid requiring teachers to disclose private family matters such as a student’s sexual orientation or pronouns. He also struck the bill’s “clear and convincing” standard and replaced it with a lower “evidence” standard, arguing teachers should have some basis for concern but not a burden equivalent to terminating parental rights. He said the amendment was meant to preserve due process, avoid weaponizing the bill in civil disputes, and reduce the risk of lawsuits.
Members then debated the scope of the bill and amendment. Supporters said schools should not withhold information about a child’s health, school environment, behavior, bullying, self-harm, or criminal conduct, and argued that parents have a right to know about serious issues such as mental health concerns, sexual assault, drug use, or other misconduct. Several members emphasized that teachers do not diagnose mental illness, but should report observable concerns and involve school administrators or counselors when necessary. Opponents argued the bill would chill communication between students and trusted adults at school, especially for children from dysfunctional or unsafe homes, and said it could force outing of gay or trans students and increase the risk of harm or self-harm. One member cited the Department of Education’s trusted-adult approach and said teachers are not covered by formal confidentiality rules in the same way as lawyers or doctors.
The discussion included examples and hypotheticals about bullying, sexual assault, drug use, self-harm, gender dysphoria, and whether a teacher would have to tell parents if a student used different pronouns or a nickname. Raymond and supporters said the bill would require disclosure of serious safety concerns but not compel teachers to diagnose or pry into private matters. Opponents argued the bill’s language still sweeps too broadly and could force disclosure in situations where a student fears abuse or being kicked out at home. The transcript does not show a final vote on the amendment or bill in the excerpt provided.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
CPN-EIG, CPN Public Hearings 03-20-2025
Commerce and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh discussions.
- Members, any discussion? I have a discussion. Yes, yeah.
- Oh, I have a discussion. Yes. Yeah. Oh, I have a discussion. Yes. Yeah.
- Any further<01:31:03.920><c> discussion?</c> further discussion? further discussion?
- Any other discussion?
Committee:
Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection
Summary:
The joint Senate committees heard HB 108 HD2, which would allow direct shipment of beer and distilled spirits by certain licensees and require liquor commissions to adopt rules. Most testimony came from craft brewers and distillers in support, who said the bill would help small and fragile producers reach customers, move limited or specialty products that wholesalers do not carry, and maintain relationships with visitors after they leave Hawaii. Supporters also argued that direct-to-consumer shipping would not meaningfully increase underage access because common carriers age-gate deliveries and require adult signatures, and that the measure would supplement rather than replace the three-tier system.
Opposition came from the Hawaii Food Industry Association and the Hawaii Liquor Wholesalers Association, which said the bill could create problems with minor access and tax revenue and would allow out-of-state manufacturers to ship directly to Hawaii households. Supporters responded that similar concerns were raised when wine direct shipping was adopted and said the existing shipping and reporting systems can track and tax these sales. Several witnesses, including Maui Brewing, Ola Brew, Koloa Rum, Hana Rum, Koulana Rumworks, Koval Distillery, and the Brewers Association, described their small-batch operations, limited distribution options, and the potential for direct shipping to expand sales and jobs.
Committee members questioned witnesses about underage access, tax collection, and the impact on the three-tier system. One witness discussed efforts to protect and potentially scale the Hawaiian spirit Okolehao through geographic and sourcing rules. The transcript does not show a final vote or disposition on HB 108 HD2 in the excerpt provided.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Gubernatorial term limits proposed 3/9/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anyone wishing to have discussion?
- It is fairly technical, so seeing no discussion, all in favor of the amendment say aye; opposed, nay.
- Is there anyone wishing to have discussion? It is fairly technical, so seeing no discussion...
- You're not things that you know that, you know, when we get to discussion on the bill, we'll probably
- If you want to talk about term limits for the legislature, I'm open to that discussion.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor and Transportation May 7th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Also, whether you're comfortable with what's being discussed in terms of borrowing and potentially a
- On a different subject that we've also discussed is the kinds of jobs that would be created, could be
- We are talking and discussing with their planning departments.
- And there could be discussions of changing the amounts that come in, not necessarily maybe the total
- So I anticipate that you're going to be having those discussions.
Summary:
The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 5 heard an update from the California High-Speed Rail Authority on its draft 2026 business plan and related budget proposals. The Authority reported continued Central Valley construction progress, including completion of 59 of 92 major structures, 80 of 119 miles of guideway under construction, 93% utility relocation completion, and plans to begin track laying and electrification soon. It said the revised goal remains completing the Merced-to-Bakersfield early operating segment by 2032-33, while also pursuing ancillary revenue opportunities, a private partner through a co-development procurement, and two budget change proposals to reappropriate $423 million for Link Union Station and $246 million in federal trust funds before they expire.
The Legislative Analyst’s Office said it had no specific concerns with the budget change proposals but raised major concerns about the draft business plan and the project’s broader fiscal outlook. LAO said the plan appears incomplete in several respects, that funding is likely insufficient to complete the revised initial operating segment and would leave a larger gap for expansion beyond the Central Valley, and that borrowing costs, optimistic assumptions, and uncertainty around future greenhouse gas reduction fund revenues could worsen the outlook. LAO suggested the Legislature could wait for a finalized business plan and highlighted unresolved questions about the scope of the project, borrowing, public-private partnerships, and proposed statutory changes.
Members focused on whether the project can be delivered on time and what financial obligations the state could face. Senators questioned the need for tax increment financing, value capture, and other legislative changes, with concerns about impacts on local governments and school districts. The Authority said utility relocation authority is its top legislative priority and that value capture is a longer-term tool that would not affect civil construction of Merced-to-Bakersfield, but could affect payback timing. It also said the state’s $1 billion annual cap-and-invest funding through 2045 is currently assumed to cover the Central Valley segment, while private partners could either finance against that state commitment or invest additional capital in other segments. Public testimony was mixed: building trades and labor groups supported the project and the Authority’s request, while local government and special district representatives opposed tax increment proposals and urged consent from affected agencies; environmental and rail advocates supported the project and urged action on utility relocation. No votes were taken, and the hearing adjourned after public comment.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- Any discussion?
- Any<00:19:07.600><c> discussion?
- Chair votes I Any discussion?
- Any discussion?
- Any discussion?
Committee:
Senate Agriculture and Environment
Keywords:
cesspool, wastewater systems, public health, environmental protection, affordable upgrades, coral reefs, water quality, Hawaii legislation, cesspools, wastewater, environment, pollution, Hawaii, sustainable development, sewerage system, real estate, disclosure, environmental impact, wastewater management, housing
Summary:
The committee heard several agriculture-related bills. HB 1953 would create a two-year conservation and environmental stewardship pilot program in the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity (DAB); testimony from Agriculture Stewardship Hawaii supported investing in conservation agriculture and farm practices that protect waterways and native species. HB 248 would establish a climate-resilient food systems grant program, with DAB explaining the types of equipment and processing investments such grants could support, such as coffee roasting, packaging, harvesting equipment, and other value-added infrastructure. HB 2246 would create a grant administration program and revolving fund to help DAB manage grants; DAB said the bill would help leverage federal, state, county, and private funding by retaining part of the indirect cost recovery to meet matching requirements. HB 2549 would create a clean plant program to produce and distribute disease-free plant material, and reforestation advocates said it would support large-scale reforestation efforts. HB 2551 would fund an area fruit fly suppression program; DAB described sterile fruit fly technology and said the program could help reduce fruit fly populations statewide. HB 2216 would authorize DAB to package and sell part of its loan portfolio to third parties, and HB 2152 would clarify liability and penalties for dog attacks on livestock, with the Hawaii Sheep and Goat Association discussing proposed language and the Hawaiian Humane Society’s suggested amendment on euthanasia procedures.
Testimony was largely supportive across the measures, with DAB, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and other agriculture and conservation groups generally backing the bills. There was some discussion on funding levels and implementation details, including DAB’s estimate of about $750,000 for three clean plant stations and a question about the appropriations needed for the fruit fly suppression program. For HB 2152, the chair noted an amendment incorporating Hawaiian Humane Society language that would require surrender of a dog found to have caused livestock loss or damage for humane euthanasia within 24 hours.
In decision-making, the committee voted to pass all of the measures discussed, most with technical amendments or date-defect amendments to July 1, 2050. HB 1953, HB 2548, HB 2549, HB 2551, HB 2216, and HB 2152 were all adopted unanimously by the members present, and HB 2246 also passed with technical amendments. The chair’s amendment to HB 2152 was specifically adopted to include the humane euthanasia language.
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- Any other discussion?
- They were discussing this and they said, 'Why hasn't this happened?'
- All right, I don't see any other discussion.
- Any discussion on the motion? Mr. Chairman. Go ahead, Senator.
- Any further discussion on the motion?" "Thank you."
Committee:
Senate Judiciary and Rules
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
Corrections and Public Institutions Feb 26th, 2026 at 08:00 am
Corrections and Public Institutions
Transcript Highlights:
- Any discussion? Well, I got a little discussion.
- Any discussion? Seeing none. Well, Representative Terry, you are recognized.
- Any discussion? Seeing none. I do have, I'm sorry, I do have a little discussion.
- Any other discussion? Seeing none.
- Any discussion? Seeing none, Madam Clerk, please call the roll. None.
Committee:
House Corrections and Public Institutions
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
Corrections and Public Institutions Feb 26th, 2026
Corrections and Public Institutions
Transcript Highlights:
- Any discussion? Well, I got a little discussion.
- Any discussion? Seeing none. I do have, I'm sorry, I do have a little discussion.
- I have an amendment ending in 0.01H and I move Have a little discussion.
- Any other discussion? Seeing none.
- Any discussion? Seeing none, Madam Clerk, please call the roll. None.
Committee:
House Corrections and Public Institutions
Summary:
The committee first took up several bills in executive session. House Committee Amendment No. 1 was adopted and rolled into a substitute for House Bills 3292 and 2171, which then received a do pass recommendation by a 10-2 vote. House Bill 2753 also received a committee substitute and was voted do pass 10-2. House Bill 2912 was voted do pass by an 11-1 vote. During this portion, one member criticized the Department of Corrections for not responding to inquiries or attending earlier hearings, and the chair acknowledged the concern.
The committee then heard testimony on House Bills 1616 and 2832, sponsored by Representatives Allen and Collins, which would create an independent corrections oversight structure, including an Office of Corrections and Transparency or ombudsman-style advocate with authority to inspect facilities, investigate complaints, access records, and report publicly. The sponsors argued that DOC currently lacks independent oversight and that internal review is insufficient. They cited deaths, unsafe conditions, medical neglect, and the need for confidential reporting by staff and incarcerated people. Committee members questioned whether the bills would duplicate existing processes, what the fiscal impact would be, and whether the proposal had enough enforcement power; the sponsors said the office would be small, likely around $300,000, and were open to amendments.
Supporters testified that independent oversight is needed because of repeated deaths in custody, lack of trust in internal complaint systems, retaliation concerns for staff, and large taxpayer costs from lawsuits and settlements. Witnesses from Empower Missouri, Missouri Justice Coalition, the NAACP, ACLU of Missouri, and FAMM all supported the bills, with several emphasizing that prisons are closed institutions with inherent power imbalances and that external oversight would improve transparency, safety, and accountability for both incarcerated people and staff. The hearing ended after testimony in support, with no opposition presented and the committee adjourning without taking final action on the oversight bills.
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- And I'm here to discuss Senate Bill 1284, the Dietitian Compact.
- I believe it discusses that. And so that's not part of this discussion today.
- Any discussion on the motion? Senator Burt. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
- Senator Burt: For a motion, if no more discussion is necessary? Motion.
- Seeing none, committee, Chair will entertain further discussion. Seeing none.
Committee:
Senate Commerce and Human Resources
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Resources, Recreation and Development (02/18/2026)
Resources, Recreation and Development
Transcript Highlights:
- I do recognize however the discussion.
- So there are no further discussions on this. investigations if they deem to do so.
- So there<00:14:55.199><c> no</c><00:14:55.519><c> further</c><00:14:56.079><c> discussions</c><00:14:
- >> Any<00:22:42.799><c> other</c><00:22:43.039><c> discussion</c><00:22:43.440><c> on</c><00:22
- </c> >> Any other discussion on the amendment?
Committee:
House Resources, Recreation and Development
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
Judiciary Feb 11th, 2026
Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there any discussion? Chair, or Representative Dolan. Thank you, Madam Chair.
- There is further discussion on this amendment?
- Is there any discussion in regard to this? Yeah, Representative Smith.
- Further discussion.
- Further discussion?
Summary:
The Judiciary Committee first met in executive session and took up House Bill 2699, which concerns offenses involving the judiciary. The committee adopted a House Committee substitute and two amendments: one adding circuit clerks, deputy circuit clerks, court administrators, division clerks, and municipal clerks, and another adding court reporters who are active participants in courtroom activities. The substitute bill was then voted do pass by a roll call of six ayes, two noes, and two present; one member stated a personal interest and voted present.
The committee then held a public hearing on House Bill 2848, the so-called “mask intimidation” bill sponsored by Representative Dolan. The bill would create a Class C misdemeanor for intentionally harassing, intimidating, or threatening another person while concealing one’s identity with a mask or similar covering, with exceptions for legitimate uses such as medical, religious, holiday, and First Amendment-related activity. Supporters, including the Anti-Defamation League, said the bill would address masked intimidation by extremist groups and protect targeted communities; there was no opposition testimony.
A public hearing followed on House Bill 2765, sponsored by Representative Justice, which would regulate intoxicating hemp beverages through a framework modeled on alcohol’s three-tier system. The bill would set licensing, testing, labeling, packaging, age-21 sales restrictions, and THC limits, and assign oversight to the Department of Health and Senior Services and the Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control. Support came from the Missouri Beer Wholesalers Association, Hemp Beverage Alliance, Missouri Petroleum and Convenience Association, Torch Drinks, Total Wine, and others, who argued the bill would create needed guardrails, keep products away from minors, and preserve a regulated retail market; some witnesses also urged broader regulation of other hemp-derived products. There was no opposition testimony, and the committee concluded its hearing without taking final action on HB 2765.
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- Discussion on that motion. Senator Anthon. I'll speak to the motion.
- I don't see any other discussion.
- We were blamed, and our sexual histories examined, We were not discussed openly.
- Discussion on that motion, Senator Shippy. Oh, Mr.
- I don't see any other discussion.
Committee:
Senate State Affairs
Summary:
The Senate State Affairs Committee approved the February 4, 2026 minutes and advanced the gubernatorial appointment of Ryan Lanham as State Athletic Commissioner to the Senate floor with a recommendation for confirmation. The committee also sent RS 33249 to print, a resolution covering reviewed and approved rules for several state agencies, including Idaho State Police, the Public Safety and Public Utilities Commissions, the Secretary of State, the Department of Administration, and the State Lottery.
Members then considered RS 33252, a joint memorial urging Idaho’s congressional delegation to pursue greater state autonomy over election laws and campaign finance, including possible constitutional changes. The memorial was introduced and sent to print without opposition. The committee next heard SB 1247, which would require E-Verify for state and local government employers and certain larger contractors. Supporters said it would protect taxpayer dollars and align with other states, while opponents argued it was too narrow, left subcontracting loopholes, and could burden employers without fully addressing illegal hiring. After debate, the bill was sent to the floor with a do pass recommendation on a 6-3 vote.
Finally, the committee heard SB 1236, a code cleanup bill to remove the obsolete Idaho Women’s Commission from statute. The sponsor said the commission was defunded years ago and the bill simply removed unused code. Testimony from women’s advocacy groups opposed the bill, arguing the commission could still be reactivated and could address ongoing issues affecting women. Committee members split over whether the commission was still needed, but the bill was ultimately sent to the floor with a do pass recommendation, with Senators Ruchti and Bernt recorded as voting no.