Transcript Highlights:

• ,<00:48:54.240> private, data of any classification, private, data of any classification,
• <00:53:03.839> Classification agency? I I missed that. Classification agency?
• > automatically data classification would automatically data classification would automatically
• So, first, for example, classification.
• 1.14 to 1.17 removes data classification 1.14 to 1.17 removes data classification language<01:14

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Item G is a request for continuation of an OPM differential for classifications at Disability Determination
• Item M is a request for continuation of classifications tied to grant positions provided by the American
• Items 1, 2, and 3 are continuations of classifications tied to Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
• The classifications include an extra help position at Commerce, a grants coordinator at Emergency Management

Summary: The committee reviewed several personnel and appropriation requests. Item C was a two-for-two position swap with no net increase in authorized positions and was approved. Item D, for South Arkansas College, added three net positions through a mix of growth and swap pool positions, including food service, public safety, housing, and compliance support roles, and was approved. Item E moved positions and $3 million in salary and match appropriation within Workforce Services to consolidate shared services, with no net change in positions, and was approved. The committee then considered a group of continuation items for FY27, covering previously approved growth and surrender pool positions, various differentials, hard-to-fill and on-call pay, a labor market adjustment for crime lab medical examiners, and continuation of grant-funded classifications tied to ARPA and IIJA grants across several agencies. These items were reviewed together and approved. Reports on the agenda required no action and were simply reviewed. On the supplemental agenda, the committee suspended the rules and approved OPM’s request for salary increases for 92 employees whose merit raises would place them over their grade maximums. Senator Dotson asked about several public safety medical examiner positions listed on the salary schedule, and staff indicated they were likely crime lab medical examiner roles. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Item G is a request for continuation of an OPM differential for classifications at Disability Determination
• Item M is a request for continuation of classifications tied to grant positions provided by the American
• Items 1, 2, and 3 are continuations of classifications tied to Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
• The classifications include an extra help position at Commerce, a grants coordinator at Emergency Management

Summary: The committee reviewed several personnel and appropriation items, including Item C, which involved a two-for-two position swap with no net increase in authorized positions and was approved after motion. Item D for South Arkansas College added three net positions through a mix of growth and swap pool requests, including food service, public safety, housing support, and compliance-related roles; it was also approved. Item E moved positions and $3 million in salary and match appropriation within Workforce Services to consolidate shared services, with no net change in positions, and was approved. The committee then took up Items F through O as continuation requests for previously approved or reviewed positions and differentials to carry into FY27. These included growth and surrender pool positions at several agencies, various pay differentials such as second-language, on-call, hard-to-fill, certification, and labor market adjustments, as well as continuation of grant-funded classifications tied to ARPA and IIJA grants and other federal grants. After no questions, the committee approved the continuations in a single motion. Under the supplemental agenda, the committee suspended the rules and approved Item A-1, which authorized salary increases above grade maximums for 92 employees due to merit increases. A senator asked about several public safety classifications listed as Med 14, 16, 14, and 15, and staff indicated they were likely crime lab medical examiner positions. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• serves a broader public health matter versus specific benefits for students of UH, which is what the tuition
• <00:08:53.120> and<00:08:53.200> fees UH, which is what the tuition and fees UH, which
• is what the tuition and fees special<00:08:53.640> fund<00:08:53.800> is<00:08:53.920>
• But again, going back to the endowment, going back to the University of Hawaii tuition and fees fund.
• <00:26:07.000> and<00:26:07.240> fees<00:26:08.080> um tuition and fees um tuition

Bills: SB2876, SB3253, SB2125, SB2781, HB549, HB1768, SB2053, SB2494, SB2851, SB3073, HB1678, HB1721, HB2475, HB2246, HB1667, HB1516, SB2532, SB3131, SB3154, HB2297, HB1737, SB2143, SB2398, SB2623, HB1740, HB1920, HB1682, SB2153, SB3140, HB1515, SB2835, HB2282, SB3083, SB2031, SB2519, SB2667, SB2140, SB2544, SB2069, SB2697, SB874, SB2043, SB888, SB2721, HB2152, HB1334, HB2385, HB1643, HB2314, HB1688, HB1692, SB2568, SB2983, SB2108, SB3136, HB1959, SB3156, HB1511, HB1753, HB1824, HB2137, HB1810, HB2279, HB2309, HB1548, HB2078, HB2293, SB3262, SB2169, SB2607, SB2964, SB3255, HB2576, HB1481, HB1864, HB1550, SB2818, SB3067, SB2061, HB1728, HB1881, HB2361, HB2395, HB1823, SB2050, SB2397, SB2175, SB2852, SB847, SB3001

Keywords: natural hair braiding, hair braiding, braids, braider, braiding license, cosmetology, barbering, barber board, Board of Barbering and Cosmetology, registration, licensure exemption, sanitation training, health and safety, hair extensions, cornrows, twists, locks, protective hairstyles, beauty industry, occupational licensing

Transcript Highlights:

• Tuition is, 75% of that tuition comes back to the program to be able to create all of the important services
• students, the regular tuition.
• Tuition and then this is the fee that is for the program per semester.
• What is the tuition? Our tuition for the entire three-year program is $27,135.
• Our tuition for the entire three-year program is $27,135. It's $5,700 a semester.

Summary: The meeting opened with routine business, including approval of the January 13, 2026 minutes, and a brief recognition of Autism Awareness Month. The task force then heard a presentation from the University of Arkansas College of Education and Health Professions on two student support programs: the Empower Program for non-degree-seeking students ages 18–24 with mild intellectual disabilities, and the Autism Support Program for degree-seeking students with autism. Speakers described academic coaching, peer and career coaching, residential supports, person-centered planning, internships, and scholarship/fee structures, noting that both programs charge a $5,000 per-semester fee and rely on scholarships and fundraising to offset costs. Members asked about dorm arrangements, individualized plans, and how students transition in and out of supports; presenters explained that Empower students remain in the program throughout, while Autism Support Program students may enter or leave services as needed. The committee next heard from Pulaski Technical College’s 3D program, a three-year transition and post-secondary program for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities focused on culinary, baking, and hospitality training. Presenters outlined integrated classes with traditional students, faded support over time, internships, and outcomes such as 97 students enrolled since the program began, 57 graduates, strong completion rates, and many graduates obtaining and retaining jobs in the food service industry. Members asked about how success is measured, why rates are not 100 percent, the role of integrated classes, tuition, and community partnerships; staff explained that grading includes technical and professional skills, tuition is $5,700 per semester, and scholarships such as GETS and FAFSA help reduce costs. They also noted plans to expand offerings and pursue accreditation through the Inclusive Higher Education Accreditation Council. Finally, the task force received a presentation from SLS Community, a Fayetteville nonprofit serving neurodivergent adults through residential supports, supported employment, community activities, and advocacy. Leaders described a long-term vision tied to the Cato Springs mixed-use development, where housing, jobs, clinical services, and community amenities would be integrated in a “live, work, play” model. They discussed a residential program, a new vocational program called Program Forge, community events, and the challenges of the “services cliff” after age 21, especially for adults with complex support needs. Members and parents spoke about the importance of trained direct support professionals, ABA-based supports, and the need for better funding and service models for adults. The meeting ended with announcements about upcoming autism-related events and a request for future discussion on task force appointments and broader issues around ABA oversight and misuse.

Transcript Highlights:

• . proven leader with deep expertise in workforce planning, labor relations, compensation, and classification
• I do believe that there will be a little bit more standardization of classifications across agencies,
• , because they took the job classification System from, I don't know the numbers right off, but about
• 1,200 classifications, maybe more than that, down to about Less than 800, I think, is what they did.
• She was A voting member when we did modernize our classification and compensation system.

Bills: SM13, SM14

Keywords: land grant, Las Vegas, governance, self-governance, judicial management, forced sterilization, coerced sterilization, Indigenous women, Native American women, women of color, reproductive justice, reproductive sovereignty, truth and reconciliation commission, memorial, trauma-informed care, reparative justice, human rights, bodily autonomy, Indian Health Service, Indian affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• you're as a student and looking at the interaction between A-BOR and the student and the cost of tuition
• From the student perspective, tuition and cost of attendance is a big concern for students.
• From my experience, tuition is a lot of money for families and students.
• enough to go to ASU with the support of a scholarship, and I appreciated that when I attended, my tuition
• Additionally, the board administers the Student Tuition Recovery Fund to compensate students who are

Summary: The Senate Education Committee met, approved the March 25, 2026 minutes, and considered two executive nominations. First, the committee heard testimony from Aidan Kane Vaux, nominated as a student regent for the Arizona Board of Regents. Vaux described his background as an ASU biomedical engineering graduate student and researcher, his teaching and mentoring experience, and his interest in representing students. Senators asked about how his engineering training would inform board service, student concerns about tuition and cost transparency, expanding STEM and health care education, mental health resources, and improving educational access in rural Arizona. Vaux said he would bring a problem-solving, data-driven perspective and emphasized affordability, student support, rural outreach, and broader access to research and health-related opportunities. The committee voted 6-0, with one member not voting, to recommend his confirmation to the full Senate. The committee then heard from Andrea Marasota Snow, nominated to the Arizona State Board for Private Post-Secondary Education. Snow said she serves as Chief Legal and Government Affairs Officer at Pima Medical Institute and would use her legal and regulatory experience to help the board with licensing, complaint review, compliance, and student protections. She emphasized balancing institutional growth with oversight and protecting students through the Student Tuition Recovery Fund and other safeguards. The committee voted 6-0, with one member not voting, to recommend her confirmation to the full Senate. Before adjourning, members thanked staff and nominees, and the chair noted Senator Diaz’s birthday. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• These programs help students save on tuition, increase affordability, and allow institutions to make
• In academic year 2024-25, WUE helped over 49,000 students across the West save on tuition.
• Beyond tuition savings, WUE delivers strategic benefits.
• costs, higher ed tuition costs.
• Millions of dollars every year in tuition costs, higher ed tuition costs.

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The Education Committee met as a committee of reference to complete required sunset reviews and hear a performance audit. Members and staff introduced themselves at the start of the session, and the chair outlined committee procedures, including limits on public testimony and the goal of adjournment by 5 p.m. The committee then heard the sunset review of the Credit Enhancement Eligibility Board. A governor’s office representative explained that the board was created in 2016 to help qualifying schools, mostly charter schools, lower borrowing costs through a credit enhancement fund. He said the board has approved 15 projects, has no dedicated staff or budget, and is now at its statutory leverage limit, so it is mainly monitoring existing obligations. Members voiced support, and the committee voted by voice vote to recommend continuation of the board for 10 years, until July 1, 2036. The committee next reviewed the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE). WICHE leadership described the interstate compact, its student exchange programs for undergraduate, graduate, and professional health care education, and related cost-savings and workforce benefits for Arizona. Testimony emphasized tuition savings for Arizona students, the return of many professional students to practice in Arizona, and the role of the compact in supporting higher education access and workforce needs. Commissioners from Arizona’s Board of Regents and Eastern Arizona College also spoke in support. The committee then voted by voice vote to recommend continuation of WICHE for 10 years, until July 1, 2036. The committee also received the Arizona Auditor General’s performance audit of the Arizona Department of Education school safety program. The audit found that while the program has grown substantially and now funds more than 1,000 school safety positions, ADE did not ensure many sampled schools complied with requirements such as operational plans, safety teams, annual training, activity logs, and expenditure documentation. The Auditor General said the department relied too heavily on written attestations and reduced monitoring as the program expanded, and recommended stronger oversight, written procedures, and better reimbursement controls. ADE’s school safety director responded that the department accepts the findings, has already begun improving monitoring, and is moving to require uploaded documentation and more risk-based reviews; he also said the department will seek additional staffing and will meet with the Auditor General and ASU to strengthen evaluation of the program. Finally, the committee took up House Bill 2142, which would establish a school safety center within ADE, assign it responsibility for administering the school safety program and providing technical assistance, and allow up to 10% of program appropriations for administration. Members discussed whether the bill should also require monitoring of emergency operations plan compliance, better address students with disabilities, and clarify coordination with other state agencies. The sponsor said he planned to offer a floor amendment to make monitoring expectations clearer. The bill was discussed but no final committee action was recorded in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• for a metro district that might have one apprentice, they would get the funding times one on that tuition
• for a metro district that might have one apprentice, they would get the funding times one on that tuition
• for a metro district that might have one apprentice, they would get the funding times one on that tuition
• spring semester to help with the tuition spring semester to help with the tuition but<00:35:24.240
• and the wages so it'd be the tuition and the wages so it'd be much<00:35:30.920> appreci<00:35

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So today it takes about 45 minutes to an hour or an hour and a half for correction officer of classification
• We also because we have our own classification and personal system are able to be nimble and address
• , hearing officers and they were for many years in the same general, administrative assistant classification
• So being able to respond and be focused, it's one of the benefits of having our own classification pay
• We did a major classification and compensation study called the evergreen study that looked at all of

Transcript Highlights:

• On to Senate Bill 1567, Senate Draft 1, House Draft 1, relating to classification and compensation systems
• Up next, we have Senate Bill 1567, Senate Draft 1, House Draft 1, relating to classification and compensation
• On to Senate Bill 1567, Senate Draft 1, House Draft 1, relating to classification and compensation systems
• draft 1, 1567, Senate draft, House draft 1, relating<00:10:20.880> to<00:10:21.120> classification
• <00:10:21.760> and relating to classification and relating to classification and compensation

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Item 5, state tuition assistance. 1,500 service members per semester, and this will allow for an increase
• Tuition for what? Haley, do you want to go ahead and then I'll jump in?
• Most of the members. that use state tuition assistance are a part of the National Guard, and then there's
• No, it's for their semester, their tuition, like they can be getting an education.
• While they're also serving in the National Guard, this will reimburse them for that tuition.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:33:15.960> of um the commercial classification of um the commercial classification of
• of properties in their classifications of properties in their jurisdictions<00:43:50.920> Market<
• <01:01:01.599> quite that particular classification quite that particular classification quite
• classification.
• The 1C classification and the commercial resort classification, and within those, they received a particular

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• fees and books after accounting tuition fees and books after accounting for<00:24:01.280> other
• And what the Minnesota National Guard's approach to scholarship or tuition help was this: You go to a
• And what the Minnesota National Guard's approach to scholarship or tuition help was this: You go to a
• And what the Minnesota National Guard's approach to scholarship or tuition help was this: You go to a
• to scholarship or tuition help was this. to scholarship or tuition help was this.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And we noticed that it focuses pretty primarily on tuition assistance, and non-tuition costs of attendance
• And at CSUs alone, housing is double the cost of tuition.
• And at CSU's alone, housing is double the cost of tuition.
• And I'm asking that because we know that housing is not a part of the tuition itself.
• The student's eligibility for in-state tuition...

Summary: The committee heard several higher education bills. It first approved the consent calendar, which included SB 67 and SB 619. The main discussion centered on SB 437, which would direct the CSU system to develop a fair, evidence-based process for verifying whether someone is a descendant of a person enslaved in the United States, as part of the state’s reparations work. Supporters said the bill fills a gap left by the Reparations Task Force and would create a transparent, credible lineage-verification process; opponents argued genealogy methods already exist, the bill would waste money and delay action, and some raised constitutional concerns. The committee took a vote on SB 437, but the roll was left open after the initial tally showed three ayes and three noes. The committee then heard SB 790, which would allow California to join the interstate reciprocity agreement for online postsecondary education. The author and supporters said the bill would improve consumer protections for California students taking out-of-state online courses and help California institutions compete more effectively by reducing the burden of seeking separate state approvals. Opponents, including University of Phoenix and other groups, argued the bill conflicted with the existing reciprocity framework, could exclude some institutions, and might not actually secure California’s entry into the agreement. The committee voted 3-1 to pass SB 790 as amended to the Business and Professions Committee, with the roll left open. The committee also heard SB 391, which would authorize the Community College Chancellor’s Office to charge fees for research partners seeking access to data. Supporters said the office is absorbing significant unfunded workload from data requests and that fees would help recover costs; opponents, including the California Teachers Association community college association, warned the fees could create barriers for faculty and smaller researchers. Members discussed possible exemptions and implementation details. The committee voted 5-1 to pass SB 391 as amended to the Appropriations Committee, with the roll left open. Finally, the committee heard SB 685, a pilot program to provide cost-of-attendance assistance at four CSU campuses for students who experienced homelessness in high school. Supporters said it would help students cover housing, food, and transportation costs and reduce dropout risk; members asked about eligibility and implementation, and the author explained the bill would use McKinney-Vento homelessness designations and target students at risk of “summer melt” and college homelessness.

Transcript Highlights:

• tutoring um therapies School tuition tutoring um therapies instructural<00:22:28.159> material
• or in some cases there school tuition or in some cases there are<00:23:07.640> selective<00:23
• The transfer—the average cost of a given district—is the tuition amount allowed to be transferred.
• cost of a given district is the tuition cost of a given district is the tuition amount<01:40:12.960
• tuition and go to that public school, and they'll pay the difference. costs<01:42:02.639> we<

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• my office has been slowed in its effort to complete these reviews by a lack of access to job classifications
• And part of the frustration at the local level and the city level is not understanding a classification
• And part of the frustration at the local level and the city level is not understanding a classification
• And part of the frustration at the local level and the city level is not understanding a classification
• And the reason why I ask is because that's, I guess, the watt classification is what is confusing for

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Agricultural classification of property or other types of classified use, pollution control devices,
• Agricultural classification of property or other types of classified use, pollution control devices,
• It is a classification of property, which is assessed in a certain way.
• what is that classification?
• We are talking about classification.

Summary: The Select Committee on Property Taxes met for an educational session focused on how Florida funds public schools and how property taxes are assessed and levied. Dr. Jim Zengali of the Department of Revenue explained the FEFP school funding formula, noting that it is built on weighted student counts, a base student allocation, and programmatic add-ons such as transportation, exceptional student education, school safety, and mental health. He said school funding is roughly split between state general revenue and local property taxes through required local effort, with additional discretionary and capital outlay millages contributing to total school funding. He also described the Department of Revenue’s role in certifying property rolls at fair market value and reviewing them for substantial compliance, including the so-called “nuclear option” if a roll is not approved. Members asked about trends in millage rates, county-by-county funding differences, the effect of growth and enrollment changes, and how property appraisals are reviewed. Zengali said aggregate millage for school funding has declined over the last decade while revenues have still increased, and he agreed to provide additional data on county trends, parcel strata, student growth, and enrollment impacts. He also clarified that school funding is equalized so students receive similar resources regardless of county wealth, and that federal funding plays only a small role in the FEFP. Amy Baker of the Joint Legislative Office of Economic and Demographic Research then discussed existing homestead benefits. She said about half of Florida’s parcels are homestead properties, most fall in the $250,000 to $500,000 value range, and many seniors without mortgages pay property taxes in lump sums rather than through escrow. Baker explained that Florida’s homestead tax burden is middle-of-the-pack nationally and that the main benefits are Save Our Homes and portability on the differential side, plus the $25,000 homestead exemption and related exemptions on the exemption side. She said these benefits reduce taxable value substantially, with homestead properties receiving a large share of the reductions, and noted that the committee requested follow-up data on exemption usage, portability timing, senior exemptions, and county-level patterns. The final presentation, by Lizette Kelly of the Department of Revenue, covered millage rates and the TRIM process. She reviewed the history of truth-in-millage notices, required taxpayer mailings, public hearing notices, and later changes that tied local millage resets to rollback and majority-vote rates. Kelly explained the difference between proposed and adopted millage, the rollback rate, and the majority-vote rate, and described how taxing authorities include counties, cities, special districts, and MSTUs. She also outlined how county taxable value is calculated from just value through assessment differentials and exemptions, and how certain exemptions, such as the additional senior exemption, apply only to the taxing authority that adopted them. No votes were taken during the meeting, but members requested several follow-up data reports for later discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• But I mean, agricultural homestead land, as you know, is the lowest property tax classification rate,
• But when I speak about the classification rate being one of the lowest, you know, I cited the other two
• But when I speak about the classification rate being one of the lowest, you know, I cited the other two
• But when I speak about the classification rate being one of the lowest, you know, I cited the other two
• But when I speak about the classification rate being one of the lowest, you know, I cited the other two

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So these state funds and tuition, which have not kept pace with inflation, they're not sufficient to
• fill that capital funding gap without decimating the very programs that bring in the tuition and then
• and then provide the the tuition and then provide the graduates<00:48:02.559> to<00:48:02.680
• you're stuck in a catch 22 um tuition you're stuck in a catch 22 um when<00:48:10.559> expenses
• <00:59:30.640> investment amount in terms of tuition investment amount in terms of tuition

Keywords: 1187, senate, all