Transcript Highlights:

• So let's also take a deeper dive into fees in rate-supported service systems, because these fees are
• So let's also take a deeper dive into fees in rate-supported service systems, because these fees are
• So you have basically three fees: special building permit, land development fees, and the monthly fee
• development fees, and the monthly fee. development fees, and the monthly fee.
• engineer mentioned. engineer mentioned.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you guys charge origination fees? Do you charge all sorts of other fees on top?
• The other fees we're allowed to charge are enshrined in statute.
• Do you guys charge origination fees? Do you charge all sorts of other fees on top points?
• The other fees were allowed to charge your enshrine in statute.
• It escalates pricing... ...engine and transmission as a part.

Bills: SB1113, SB1117, SB1206, SB1460, SB1802, SB1906, SB1917, SB2340, SB2455, SB2680, SB2690, SB705, SB748

Keywords: SB 1113, converter's license, converter license, motor vehicle dealer, auto dealer, vehicle conversion, converted vehicles, direct sales, retail sales, trailer, semitrailer, manufactured trailer, chassis, manufacturer's statement of origin, MSO, Occupations Code, Transportation Code, Texas Department of Motor Vehicles, dealer licensing, general distinguishing number

Summary: The committee took up pending business first and reported several bills favorably, including SB 2139, SB 2610, SB 1856, SB 2530, SB 2401, SB 2858, and SB 3016, with most of those measures moving out on committee substitutes and being sent to the local and uncontested calendar or to the full Senate. The committee also heard SB 1906 on expanding Chapter 342E consumer lending rates; supporters argued it would modernize Texas law and expand access to safe, regulated credit, while opponents from Texas Appleseed and AARP warned it would raise costs on already expensive loans and worsen debt burdens. SB 1906 was left pending after testimony. The committee also reconsidered and re-voted SB 1856 after a procedural issue, with the substitute ultimately adopted and the bill reported favorably. The committee then heard SB 1113, which would clarify that certain vehicle converters, including a Texarkana business, do not need an additional dealer license to sell converted vehicles. The bill’s supporters described a long-standing business model and said the new metal license plate rules had created problems, while the Texas Automobile Dealers Association opposed the bill in its current form and said it could be resolved through DMV action or narrower changes. DMV said it was still researching a possible administrative fix, and SB 1113 was left pending. The committee also heard SB 2680, a Public Information Act cleanup bill dealing with emergency deadlines, business-day exclusions, and litigation timing; broadcasters and other open-government advocates argued the issues were already addressed by prior law and court rulings, while the Attorney General’s office said the bill would help with catastrophe notices and timing conflicts. SB 2680 was left pending. Other bills heard included SB 1117, which would allow any Texas-licensed dentist to administer botulinum toxin neuromodulators for aesthetic purposes in the oral and maxillofacial region; the author and dental witnesses said it would clarify scope and improve access, and the bill was left pending. SB 2340 would clarify the Attorney General’s investigative authority over Texas corporations, including pre-suit depositions and sworn written questions; opponents raised due process and separation-of-powers concerns, and the bill was left pending. The committee also heard SB 705 and SB 748, both TDLR cleanup bills, and SB 1206, which would impose timelines and notice requirements on municipalities reviewing transmission projects; SB 1206 was supported by an electric cooperative and left pending. SB 1460, creating an ethics violation registry tied to licensing consequences, drew constitutional and due-process objections from several witnesses and was also left pending. After a recess, the committee heard SB 1802 on landlord duties to repair mobility assistance devices like elevators and ramps in rental housing, with the author describing prolonged outages affecting seniors; the bill was left pending. Finally, SB 2455, creating an Energy Waste Advisory Committee to coordinate efficiency and demand-response programs, drew support from energy-efficiency and environmental witnesses and was left pending, and SB 2690, targeting deceptive business-certification solicitations, was laid out and opened to testimony before the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:15:47.279> road<00:15:47.440> and engineers actually owns this road and engineers
• ><00:24:24.720> necessary engineers have performed the necessary engineers have performed the
• Thank you. of engineers and coast guard. The muscle of engineers and coast guard.
• with the Army Corps of Engineers with the Army Corps of Engineers >> and<00:31:35.440>
• > was the ownership ownership fee was the ownership ownership fee was established<00:49:53.440

Keywords: 00:01 Call to Order and Roll Call 00:47 Approval of Minutes 01:07 Airport Projects 12:17 Riverport Projects 38:27 Electric Vehicle Charging Program 54:10 Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The Budget Review Subcommittee on Transportation met on July 15, 2025, approved the June 4 minutes, and heard updates on aviation and riverport funding programs. Commissioner Mark Carter of the Kentucky Department of Aviation reported on the $200,000 grants for general aviation airports included in House Bill 1, saying the money is being used mainly for hangar projects, fuel trucks, parking lot resurfacing, airport equipment, crew cars, and public education efforts. He said about 25 hangar-related projects were reported, with an estimated 60 T-hangars and four or five box hangars supported, and noted that the grants are often used to match federal funds. He also said the state’s jet fuel tax revenue generates about $23 million annually, up from about $19 million in 2021, and that most airports are now compliant with the ADS-B/VOR-related reporting system required in budget language, which has improved reported operations and may help airports qualify for FAA grants. Members asked about the pace of airport projects, the limited number of contractors for hangar construction, and whether airports could finance hangars themselves. Carter said timing has generally been good, though federal projects have slowed somewhat and contractor capacity remains a challenge, and he said there is no statute preventing airports from financing part or all of a hangar project. Questions also focused on the long-term need for hangars and the effect of the jet fuel cap, with Carter saying general aviation airports still have significant hangar demand and rely on state assistance because hangars are a key revenue source. Jeremy Edgeworth of the Transportation Cabinet and Brian Wright of the Kentucky Association of Riverports then reviewed riverport projects funded through House Bill 265 and House Bill 1. Edgeworth said the cabinet’s riverport grant program awarded $500,000 in each of fiscal years 2025 and 2026 for 13 projects under an 80/20 match, and that House Bill 1 provided $7.5 million per year for public riverports with no local match. He described completed or underway projects at multiple ports, including equipment replacements, dock and road repairs, material handling upgrades, mooring cell rehabilitation, and a waterline loop at Owensboro. He said $12.6 million of the KPRCM funds had been awarded across 20 projects, with about $2.4 million still to be awarded later in the fall. Wright said the riverport investments are helping ports replace aging assets, expand capacity, and match federal dollars, but he also said the statewide capital need remains large, with the current list of top projects already in the $90 million range and longer-term needs still estimated at $60 million to $90 million. Members asked about timelines and future needs, and Edgeworth said many of the larger projects will take two to five years because of permitting and coordination with the Army Corps of Engineers. No additional votes or formal actions were taken beyond approving the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• , if they don't cut the fees they can charge for these.
• So I wonder what that was included in regards to the fees.
• how the fees are calculated.
• But we are working way to approach on those fees going back.
• Chair in reference to 2 the fees.

Transcript Highlights:

• Does the Army Corps of Engineers have a- The Army Corps of Engineers operates under a federal paradigm
• I have two engineering degrees, two from the University of Texas. at Austin, one in aerospace engineering
• and the other in civil engineering.
• Corps of Engineers.
• Item number 11, voter education fees.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• might need uh what are called gas fees might need uh what are called gas fees on<01:16:20.719>
• c> less<01:22:07.199> fraud, less fees and less fraud, less fees and less fraud, why<01:22
• > fee?
• Again, talking about the fees, the other thing they found was that the fees were 20% or more for these
• 03:00:16.800> specifies if a structural engineer specifies if a structural engineer specifies

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• At the bottom of page 13, the report reviews Eastern's rising architectural and engineering fees.
• They provide recommended fees, and these are outlined in table 12.
• Eastern's engineering or architectural fees went from $799,000 to $3.5 million.
• And the engineers won't cover it, the architects won't cover it.
• So we're providing - we've hired engineers.

Transcript Highlights:

• We no longer collect the host fee.
• The ESMC program has played an fee.
• And I know come out a delivery fee.
• <00:42:37.839> is heard the delivery fee is heard the delivery fee is underperforming.<00:
• and ultimately the the engineer on this. and ultimately the the engineer on this.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• There are other fees beyond the out of state fee that were also defined in statute.
• There's a desire for a new fee.
• Here's a listing of the fees that are thought to exist and statute there are over 40 fees, fines and
• So that's an overview of on tuition and fees.
• . 4 out of state students in terms of tuition and fee collections.

Transcript Highlights:

• or gain these fees.
• While I understand there are fees and that I have to pay fees, the duplicate fees are a issue in this
• Lower fees.
• Or is this just fee on top of fee on top of fee that goes to the general fund that just... you know,
• We need to have less fees. What would I do if I had less fees?

Bills: SB264, SB542, SB924, SB1008, SB1029, SB1036, SB1057, SB1058, SB1185, SB1202, SB1358, SB1364, SB1376, SB1569, SB1664, SB1697, SJR50

Keywords: SB 264, Texas Workers' Compensation Act, group self-insurance, self-insured groups, workers' compensation, Texas Department of Insurance, commissioner of insurance, certificate of approval, guaranty fund, trust fund, wind down, dissolution, labor code, insurance regulation, employer coverage, risk pool, business and commerce, trade workforce economic development, property owners' association, water conservation

Transcript Highlights:

• We are still working on our engines.
• You're talking about in a truck or an actual fire engine. Itself fire engine, yes sir.
• Those single-engine air tankers are, uh, an air tractor.
• We even have an engine shop for the RJ 85s that we can do engine repairs, which is, uh, a little bit
• Pole attachment fees.

Transcript Highlights:

• We want to know that the water and sewer tap fees, the sewer fees, the stormwater runoff fees, those
• Impact fees. Impact fees! Wow.
• And so they are charged, it's called a GRP fee, a Groundwater Reduction Program fee.
• On the wastewater side, you see your wastewater fee, your surface water fee, your storm water fee, and
• Army Corps of Engineers.

Summary: During the meeting, legislative members discussed the practice of municipalities diverting water and sewer revenues to their general funds, which impacts infrastructure maintenance and project delays. Vice Chair Sparks proposed limiting public testimony to two minutes, which was adopted without objection. The committee heard from various witnesses, including Perry Fowler from the Texas Water Infrastructure Network, who emphasized that utility revenues should primarily support water services and that transfers should be transparent and justified. He noted that many utilities face financial pressures that could hinder infrastructure projects. Larry French from the Texas Public Policy Foundation highlighted the significant financial impact of water loss and general fund transfers, estimating the annual loss at $1.5 billion. He argued that these transfers can create disincentives for municipalities to address water loss issues. Brian Butcher, Assistant City Manager of Sugar Land, defended the city's cost allocation model for general fund transfers, asserting that they are necessary for equitable service provision and operational efficiency. The committee also discussed the implications of rising construction costs and the need for better procurement processes to ensure effective use of taxpayer dollars. The second part of the meeting focused on the New World Screwworm and the state's preparedness to manage potential infestations. Dudley Hoskins from the USDA outlined the federal response efforts and the importance of collaboration with state agencies. He emphasized the need for ongoing surveillance and the production of sterile flies to combat the pest. Dr. Philip Kaufman from Texas A&M discussed the historical context of the screwworm and the challenges posed by its potential reintroduction, urging proactive management strategies among livestock producers. The committee acknowledged the need for increased resources and research to effectively address the threat of the screwworm.

Transcript Highlights:

• This year alone, I personally sent 200 Missourians to work as operating engineers on these projects.
• , the reduction fees, the reduction fees.
• Guarantees, the collateral payments, the termination fees, the reduction fees, all of those things, the
• We've done the engineering studies.
• So when I was a very young engineer, which goes back about 45 years ago, So when I was a very young engineer

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Air tankers, helicopters, single engines, single engine scoopers, air tanks. and multi-mission aircraft
• We are still working on our engines. So if we have a diesel engine.
• You're talking about in a truck or actually. fire engine itself. Fire engine, yes sir.
• We even have an engine shop for the RG85. that we can do engine repairs, which is a little bit unique
• L, engine replacements, all the things that.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It creates a fee on qualified large-scale data centers that goes into the energy and conservation account
• Engineers, technicians, electricians, construction workers, and again, we have a lot of competition,
• Engineers, technicians, electricians, construction workers, and again, we have a lot of competition,
• Engineers, technicians, electricians, construction workers, and again, we have a lot of competition,
• Engineers, technicians, electricians, construction workers, and again, we have a lot of competition,

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Vessel registration amends voter registration fees and their distribution.
• Up, we set it up for a $5 fee to be added to the registration.
• Um right now it is the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers to maintain the channel.
• Um right now it is the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers to maintain the channel.
• responsibility of the core of engineers responsibility of the core of engineers to<00:18:20.960>

Bills: HB66, HB79, SB35, HB255, SB134, HB159, HB181

Keywords: elder abuse, financial exploitation, inheritance, joint tenancy, conviction effects, off-label, pharmacists, medical treatment, state board of pharmacy, employment protection, sexual extortion, criminal law, felony, threat, blackmail, HB255, Employees' Retirement System of Alabama, ERSA, State Police Tier II Plan, annual leave

Transcript Highlights:

• for you know what we call the green fees for you know what we call the green fees bill<00:30:21.320
• focus on the engine itself.
• operation of the engine, that would be it.
• of the engine the maintenance operation of the engine the maintenance and<00:49:55.319> so<00
• <00:51:36.400> then that does not affect the engine then that does not affect the engine then

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 1077, a governor’s administration bill to increase transient accommodations tax revenue and split it between two new special funds: a climate mitigation and resiliency special fund and an economic development and revitalization special fund for tourism/resort areas. Supporters, including the Governor’s Office, recovery and resilience staff, climate and conservation groups, and several state agencies, said the bill would create a dedicated, more reliable funding stream for wildfire mitigation, coastal resilience, land clearing, infrastructure, and community-led projects. Some supporters also urged changes to the bill, including moving the fund to DLNR, adding DHHL and OHA representation, clarifying community grants, and ensuring the fund can support both state-led and community-led resilience work. The Attorney General’s office flagged a drafting issue, noting that the bill references fees deposited into the new fund even though the new chapter does not authorize fee collection, and recommended deleting that language or adding fee authority. The Climate Advisory Team representative also suggested adding DHHL to the decision-making body and requiring at-large members to have climate, resilience, conservation, or infrastructure expertise. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii and the Kohala Coast Resort Association opposed the measure, arguing that the special fund structure does not meet statutory criteria, that the bill functions as a tax increase, and that the transient accommodations tax is not being collected equitably across all lodging types before any increase is imposed. Other opponents, including tourism and lodging interests, warned that hotels and timeshares already bear most of the tax burden and that raising the TAT could hurt an already struggling visitor industry and drive tourists away. Supporters countered that current funding is far short of what is needed and that a dedicated revenue stream is necessary to address climate impacts now. Committee members questioned why the Legislature should cede spending decisions to a separate executive-branch process, and the administration responded that the bill is intended to create a transparent, recurring mechanism for funding priorities that can be adjusted over time. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• If we're doing that, is the COGs holding out an administrative fee when they work our money?
• And when we're holding out administrative fees, it sure gets into it.
• Some are getting charged an administrative fee and others are not.
• You have to the State Engineer, $10 million for the Indian Water Rights Settlement Fund.
• Then down to the next one for the State Engineer. This would be recurring.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• not including connection fees, which could have...
• Over $10 million of impact fees, not including connection fees, which could have gone to mitigate some
• We have code officials, structural engineers, mechanical engineers, the disabled community, residential
• We have code officials, structural engineers, mechanical engineers, the disabled community, residential
• I ran DCI Engineers, a structural engineering firm, for about 15 years.

Summary: The committee heard first from Ferndale city officials and a representative of FutureWise on annexation planning. Ferndale described its “annexation blueprint” or phased annexation plan as a way to tie urban growth area planning, capital facilities, and eventual annexation together earlier in the process. Speakers argued that counties often allow incremental development in urban growth areas without city-level standards, impact fees, or coordinated infrastructure planning, which can leave cities and taxpayers with higher future costs and make annexation less likely. Members raised questions about fire districts, county revenue loss, and whether annexation incentives or interlocal revenue-sharing agreements could help. FutureWise supported requiring annexation phasing in countywide planning policies, using pre-annexation agreements, and applying city standards in urban growth areas to make annexation more predictable and less contentious. The committee then received a primer and update from the State Building Code Council (SBCC). Staff explained the council’s composition, standing committees, technical advisory groups, and rulemaking process, including normal, expedited, and emergency rulemaking. They described the ongoing 2024 code cycle and the separate work underway on Senate Bill 5491 and related legislation concerning single-stair residential buildings and multiplex housing. Members discussed how the legislature can better direct the SBCC, the difference between prescriptive and performance-based code approaches, and the importance of involving technical experts early. The SBCC also addressed concerns about the wildfire urban interface code, noting that problems arose when code language and maps were developed on different timelines and applied to urban areas in ways that were not anticipated. Several members asked about regional differences, especially energy code impacts in eastern Washington and the role of natural gas. SBCC representatives said the council can use climate zones and appendices for some regional variation, but statewide statutory targets still constrain the energy code. They emphasized that the council is largely reactive to legislative direction and public proposals, and that clearer legislative intent would help avoid ambiguity in future code development. No votes were taken during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• traffic or engineering studies are done. traffic or engineering studies are done.
• have engineering on staff.
• their own engineers to do them as well. their own engineers to do them as well.
• <01:15:53.200> on engineer if they have engineering on engineer if they have engineering on
• . fees. fees.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: House Transportation opened public hearings on three Senate bills and discussed a fourth scheduling issue. On SB 499, which would change Traffic Safety Commission reporting requirements, the sponsor’s representative said the bill would require annual aggregated data on the causes of traffic collisions in New Hampshire and recommendations to address them. Members asked about the added Trauma Medical Review Committee seat, and a representative explained that it is a longstanding state board of emergency and trauma professionals; the bill had already been amended and passed unanimously earlier in the process. On SB 500, concerning restroom access for certain commercial motor vehicle operators, the sponsor and trucking-industry supporters said the measure arose from concerns raised by female truck drivers and was intended to require larger commercial facilities with available public or employee restrooms to allow truck drivers to use them when there are no public safety concerns. Supporters from the New Hampshire Motor Transport Association said driver shortages make it important to recruit and retain women, and that lack of bathroom access is a significant barrier. Committee members asked about the scope of the problem and whether the issue affected male and female drivers differently. The committee then heard SB 559, which would reduce the minimum allowable speed limit on locally controlled roads. Supporters, including bicyclists and the Bike-Walk Alliance, testified that lower speeds improve safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers, citing personal crash experiences and national guidance supporting lower urban speed limits where warranted by traffic or engineering studies. They emphasized the bill would not mandate lower limits statewide but would give towns local discretion. Members questioned whether the group would support 15 mph limits and how congestion and travel-time concerns were weighed. A Department of Transportation official testified neutrally, saying the agency had no formal position but had concerns about public perception and possible spillover to unnumbered state roads. The chair also noted an earlier scheduling problem that prevented immediate executive action on a bill until later in the day.