Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> know</c><00:32:02.919><c> that</c><00:32:03.200><c> youth</c><00:32:03.519><c> of</c><00:32:03.760
• 32:31.559><c> will</c><00:32:31.760><c> need</c><00:32:31.919><c> to</c><00:32:32.080><c> be</c><00:32
• c> how</c><00:32:39.559><c> are</c><00:32:39.639><c> we</c><00:32:39.799><c> doing</c><00:32:40.000><
• approach<00:32:42.039><c> this</c><00:32:42.159><c> is</c><00:32:42.480><c> this</c><00:32:42.600><c
• 00:32:57.399><c> the</c><00:32:57.480><c> Metro</c><00:32:58.080><c> area</c><00:32:58.919><c> as</c>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• school<00:32:35.920><c> board</c><00:32:36.120><c> meeting</c><00:32:36.840><c> or</c><00:32:37.000><
• :32:39.360><c> I</c><00:32:39.440><c> think</c><00:32:39.680><c> that</c><00:32:39.840><c> concludes<
• 24 24<00:32:51.120><c> hours</c><00:32:51.440><c> under</c><00:32:51.600><c> the</c><00:32:51.680><c>
• </c><00:32:53.640><c> has</c><00:32:53.800><c> to</c><00:32:53.880><c> be</c><00:32:54.000><c> posted
• :55.920><c> of</c><00:32:56.000><c> which</c><00:32:56.200><c> may</c><00:32:56.320><c> be</c><00:32:

Committee: Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:05.440><c> talk</c><00:32:05.679><c> about</c><00:32:06.000><c> high</c><00:32:06.320><c>
• ><c> for</c><00:32:07.440><c> a</c><00:32:07.760><c> portion</c><00:32:08.399><c> of</c><00:32:09.200
• is an<00:32:13.440><c> essential</c><00:32:13.760><c> mode</c><00:32:14.000><c> in</c><00:32:14.240>
• So this is<00:32:15.200><c> not</c><00:32:15.360><c> a</c><00:32:15.519><c> report</c><00:32:15.840><
• </c><00:32:18.480><c> quite</c><00:32:18.720><c> the</c><00:32:18.960><c> contrary,</c><00:32:19.360>

Committee: House Transportation Finance and Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:02.000><c> to</c><00:32:02.640><c> um</c><00:32:03.360><c> scam</c><00:32:03.760><c> this<
• > um</c><00:32:05.760><c> using</c><00:32:06.080><c> some</c><00:32:06.320><c> of</c><00:32:06.399><c
• would use<00:32:08.880><c> today</c><00:32:09.360><c> to</c><00:32:09.600><c> make</c><00:32:09.760>
• </c><00:32:12.640><c> I</c><00:32:12.880><c> mean,</c><00:32:13.760><c> is</c><00:32:13.919><c> it</c
• /c><00:32:15.279><c> them</c><00:32:15.519><c> just</c><00:32:15.760><c> I</c><00:32:15.919><c> mean,

Committee: Senate Higher Education

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:06.120><c> Um</c><00:32:06.440><c> and</c><00:32:06.600><c> so,</c><00:32:06.880><c> there
• wildlife, energy.<00:32:15.320><c> Um</c><00:32:15.480><c> and</c><00:32:15.640><c> so,</c><00:32:15.760
• ><c> County,</c><00:32:21.920><c> which</c><00:32:22.120><c> is</c><00:32:22.240><c> looking</c><00:32
• about</c><00:32:32.440><c> uh</c><00:32:32.600><c> solid</c><00:32:33.000><c> waste,</c><00:32:33.400
• </c><00:32:36.680><c> But</c><00:32:36.800><c> I</c><00:32:36.880><c> really</c><00:32:37.120><c> do<

Committee: House Ways and Means

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:32:00.720><c> we</c><00:32:00.960><c> can</c><00:32:01.279><c> address</c><00:32:02.159><c> the</
• fraud um<00:32:03.279><c> but</c><00:32:03.519><c> also</c><00:32:03.840><c> ensure</c><00:32:04.159
• </c><00:32:12.880><c> So,</c><00:32:13.120><c> looking</c><00:32:13.360><c> forward</c><00:32:13.600>
• 32:45.279><c> restore</c><00:32:45.679><c> that</c><00:32:45.919><c> funding</c><00:32:46.640><c> to<
• veterans</c><00:32:50.799><c> in</c><00:32:51.360><c> the</c><00:32:52.000><c> um</c><00:32:52.240><c

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• and and to really<00:32:12.159><c> I</c><00:32:12.399><c> don't</c><00:32:12.480><c> know</c><00:32:
• I I don't<00:32:20.960><c> know</c><00:32:21.200><c> if</c><00:32:21.440><c> we</c><00:32:21.600><c>
• can</c><00:32:21.760><c> peel</c><00:32:22.080><c> back</c><00:32:22.320><c> the</c><00:32:22.480><c>
• we</c><00:32:28.159><c> need</c><00:32:28.320><c> that</c><00:32:28.720><c> to</c><00:32:28.880><c>
• Um<00:32:37.039><c> I</c><00:32:37.200><c> I</c><00:32:37.600><c> think</c><00:32:37.760><c> that's</

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Medicaid Oversight Advisory Board’s fourth meeting focused primarily on a presentation from University of Kentucky and University of Louisville health leaders about the state university directed payment program. Mark Birdwhistle and Ken Marshall described the program as a long-running, value-based Medicaid arrangement that began in 2019, uses university-provided matching funds rather than provider taxes, and ties a portion of payments to quality outcomes. They said the program has improved measures such as tobacco cessation, diabetes control, depression screening, and cancer screening, while supporting access to specialty care, medical education, and workforce training. They also emphasized that Kentucky’s model is nationally notable and has helped improve health rankings and generate cost savings. A major topic was the federal reconciliation bill signed July 4, which the presenters said will reduce directed payments by 10% annually for 10 years beginning in 2028. UL Health estimated a first-year loss of about $75 million and a cumulative loss of about $600 million over the decade; UK estimated about $100 million in the first year, for a combined first-year impact of roughly $175 million. Both speakers warned the cuts could affect access to care, training capacity, and the sustainability of Kentucky’s value-based model, though they expressed hope that congressional action could alter or delay the changes. They also noted that 340B drug pricing changes could further strain already thin operating margins, but did not provide exact figures during the meeting. Committee members responded positively to the program’s reported outcomes and the institutions’ role in Kentucky health care. Senator Berg praised the quality of care and shared a personal example of being advised to stay at UofL for breast cancer treatment. Representative Moer highlighted Kentucky’s strong cancer-control score and asked for more explanation of the value-based payment structure; the presenters said the system is built around ongoing measurement, accountability, and collaboration with the Cabinet for Health and Family Services. No votes or formal actions were taken beyond approving the amended August 27 minutes by voice vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• 01:32:05.840><c> write</c><01:32:06.159><c> a</c><01:32:06.400><c> new</c><01:32:06.560><c> bill</c><
• Well,<01:32:08.719><c> I</c><01:32:08.960><c> guess</c><01:32:09.120><c> I</c><01:32:09.760><c> I</c>
• <01:32:10.159><c> mean</c><01:32:10.239><c> I</c><01:32:10.480><c> I</c><01:32:10.639><c> I</c><01:32
• /c><01:32:12.080><c> I'm</c><01:32:12.400><c> I</c><01:32:12.400><c> I</c><01:32:12.480><c> I</c><01:
• 32:40.399><c> have</c><04:32:40.560><c> OCD,</c><04:32:41.040><c> I</c><04:32:41.279><c> can</c><04:32

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Judiciary Committee opened a hearing on Senate Bill 146, which would remove the requirement that a medical examiner physically view a body before issuing a cremation certificate. The prime sponsor, Sen. Suprentice, and Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Jenny Duval explained that the bill would not change the death certificate process or the existing waiting period before cremation; it would only eliminate the in-person viewing step. They said the current review of death certificates already catches the vast majority of cases that should be reported to the medical examiner, and that the physical view changes outcomes in less than 1% of cremation cases. The witnesses emphasized that the bill is intended to improve efficiency and reduce delays for families and funeral homes, while freeing deputy medical examiners to focus on homicides, suicides, accidents, and unexpected natural deaths. Dr. Duval cited an example where review of a death certificate, not the body, uncovered a long-ago strangulation-related homicide, arguing that the key safeguard is review of records and cause of death, not the physical view. She also said the change would save travel time and some costs for the department. Committee members asked about how death certificates list primary and contributing causes of death, whether the low percentage of findings means the current process has a deterrent effect, why cremation is treated differently from burial, and whether identification concerns are adequately addressed. The sponsors responded that identification is handled earlier by hospitals, families, and funeral directors, and that any questionable identification would already fall under medical examiner jurisdiction. They also said the bill would not alter the two-day cremation delay or other existing safeguards. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:23.840><c> going</c><00:32:23.960><c> to</c><00:32:24.080><c> be</c><00:32:24.200><c> a</c
• > can</c><00:32:26.120><c> allow</c><00:32:26.799><c> uh</c><00:32:27.960><c> instead</c><00:32:28.240
• expenditure perhaps<00:32:31.200><c> the</c><00:32:31.360><c> bill</c><00:32:31.600><c> can</c><00:32
• ><00:32:34.440><c> I</c><00:32:34.519><c> think</c><00:32:34.679><c> it's</c><00:32:35.000><c> 4-9</c
• ><c> chair</c> sure<00:32:49.559><c> Senator</c><00:32:50.799><c> so</c><00:32:51.799><c> I</c><00:32

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Agriculture and Environment hearing on January 27, 2025, took up multiple measures, beginning with a proposed constitutional amendment, HB 559, to recognize a right to clean water and air, a healthful environment, climate, native ecosystems, and beaches. The Attorney General’s Office testified with concerns that the amendment’s broad language could create challenges for future legislatures and environmental enforcement, while the Climate Commission and DLNR supported it. Environmental and advocacy groups, including Climate Protectors Hawaii, 350 Hawaii, Greenpeace Hawaii, and others, strongly supported the measure, arguing it would strengthen decision-making and protect Hawaii’s natural resources. Committee members raised questions about how the amendment would interact with existing constitutional protections and recent litigation, and the AG’s office said the proposal could lead to broad judicial interpretation and possible liability issues. The hearing then moved on without a recorded vote on this bill. The committee next heard SB 552, which would establish a healthy soils program in the Department of Agriculture and require annual reporting and funding. The Climate Change Commission supported the bill, and the Department of Agriculture said it stood on its submitted testimony but noted existing commissions and the greenhouse gas sequestration task force already address similar objectives, suggesting SB 552 may duplicate current efforts. Agricultural and environmental advocates, including the Hawaii Farmers Union, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and others, supported the concept of a consolidated healthy soils program, saying it would better organize existing efforts, improve access for producers, and support conservation practices. The Agribusiness Development Corporation said it would support either DOA or ADC administering the program, and committee discussion focused on implementation, program overlap, and whether the bill should better integrate existing compost reimbursement and related efforts. The final measure discussed in the excerpt was SB 678, which would create an Agricultural Development Food Security Special Fund, dedicate a portion of the environmental response, energy, and food security tax to it, and appropriate funds equal to 3% of the state budget for agriculture. The Department of Agriculture strongly supported the bill, saying the funding would align with its goals and help support farmers and ranchers. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii and the Department of Budget and Finance raised concerns that the proposed special fund may not meet statutory criteria. Farm and industry groups generally supported the measure but suggested changes, including adding uses related to local food sourcing, distribution, and biosecurity. Committee members questioned the scale of the appropriation, noting it could amount to roughly $250 million and a major increase in DOA’s budget, and discussed whether the department could realistically implement such a large program. The hearing ended with testimony counts noted for the measures heard, and the chair indicated the committee would reconvene later for any unfinished business.

Transcript Highlights:

• , and investigate<00:32:31.760><c> the</c><00:32:32.000><c> cause</c><00:32:32.320><c> of</c><00:32:32.480
• 00:32:36.880><c> Hampshire</c><00:32:37.279><c> First.
• </c> Turning<00:32:41.519><c> to</c><00:32:41.760><c> page</c><00:32:42.159><c> eight,</c><00:32:42.880
• ><c> and</c><00:32:46.640><c> document</c><00:32:47.120><c> a</c><00:32:47.440><c> formal</c><00:32:47.840
• And<00:32:58.880><c> that</c><00:32:59.120><c> the</c><00:32:59.440><c> commission</c><00:32:59.840><

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The committee first approved the June 20, 2025 minutes, with several members abstaining, and then adopted the consent calendar after removing items 223 and 224 under tab five, item 222 under tab six, and item 231 under tab seven. The committee also noted that an old business item related to YDC claims administration would be removed at a future meeting because the fiscal year had closed and no further committee action was needed. The main substantive discussion centered on Department of Health and Human Services requests. Item FIS-223 would fund a shared database between the Department of Education and HHS to identify children eligible for the summer EBT program; members asked whether it could also help with Medicaid or school reimbursement tracking, but the witness said the item was specifically for summer EBT and that broader integration questions would need follow-up with Education and Medicaid staff. The committee then adopted the item, with Representative Mooney voting no. Item FIS-224 concerned the phrase "high quality services" in child care-related funding; HHS said the standards come from the federal Office of Child Care, and the committee adopted the item. Item FIS-222 related to Money Follows the Person; HHS explained it is a 100% federally funded program that supports transitions from institutions to community living with services such as housing navigation, furnishings, and case management. Members questioned the scale and cost of the program, and HHS said the initial federal award was $5 million, with additional federal IT funding later approved; the committee adopted the item, again with Representative Mooney voting no. Under tab seven, the committee discussed item 231 involving ARPA funds and the YDC project. The Department of Administrative Services explained that recent Treasury guidance allows leftover ARPA dollars from approved projects to be repurposed only for additional work on already approved projects, not new projects. Members asked about whether the project was over budget and whether some items had been in the original plan; officials said the work reflected add alternates from the original bid and that the project was on track to meet the deadline. The committee adopted the item. The meeting then moved to the audit presentation on the New Hampshire Liquor Commission’s fiscal year 2024 management letter, which identified 13 internal control comments, including two material weaknesses, largely tied to the new NextG system. Recommendations included strengthening controls, formal risk assessment, reconciliations to New Hampshire First, cash receipt controls, subsidiary ledgers, SOC reports for vendors, internal audit functions, lease accounting, gift card breakage reporting, and IT security and access controls. The Liquor Commission said it concurred with most findings, described the system transition as successful overall, and said remediation would continue; committee members asked for estimated completion dates for audit findings and discussed the need for more regular follow-up on audit issues and budget monitoring.

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> summary,</c><00:32:03.760><c> it</c><00:32:04.000><c> would</c><00:32:04.159><c> look</c><00:32:
• </c><00:32:09.760><c> I</c><00:32:10.240><c> anticipate</c><00:32:10.960><c> that</c><00:32:11.200><c
• </c><00:32:24.240><c> in</c><00:32:24.480><c> a</c><00:32:24.640><c> variety</c><00:32:24.960><c> of<
• </c><00:32:25.760><c> I</c><00:32:25.919><c> I</c><00:32:26.080><c> believe</c><00:32:26.240><c> they
• I believe<00:32:28.880><c> they</c><00:32:29.120><c> have</c><00:32:29.279><c> that</c><00:32:29.919>

Committee: Joint Appropriations

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• and almost<00:32:02.559><c> 20%</c><00:32:03.080><c> of</c><00:32:03.240><c> students</c><00:32:04.279
• via direct admissions<00:32:08.760><c> um</c><00:32:08.919><c> I</c><00:32:09.000><c> think</c><00:32
• </c><00:32:46.480><c> Uh</c><00:32:46.639><c> current</c><00:32:47.000><c> cohort</c><00:32:47.960><c
• 32:49.039><c> here</c><00:32:49.159><c> at</c><00:32:49.399><c> this</c><00:32:49.600><c> time</c> next
• ><c> um</c><00:32:56.679><c> so</c><00:32:56.799><c> you</c><00:32:56.919><c> can</c><00:32:57.039><c

Committee: Senate Higher Education

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:12.159><c> I</c><00:32:12.399><c> do</c><00:32:12.559><c> not</c><00:32:12.720><c> believe
• ><c> that</c><00:32:18.640><c> will</c><00:32:18.880><c> increase</c><00:32:19.279><c> costs</c><00:32
• database<00:32:32.159><c> on</c><00:32:32.880><c> uh</c><00:32:33.120><c> paying</c><00:32:33.600><c
• , the bill directs<00:32:42.240><c> ANR</c><00:32:42.640><c> and</c><00:32:42.880><c> DEEC</c><00:32:
• expand monitoring<00:32:45.919><c> rule</c><00:32:46.240><c> making</c><00:32:46.640><c> and</c><00:32

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So,<00:32:20.799><c> one</c><00:32:20.960><c> thing</c><00:32:21.039><c> I</c><00:32:21.279><c> will<
• </c><00:32:24.080><c> uh</c><00:32:24.799><c> uh</c><00:32:25.200><c> focus</c><00:32:25.519><c> on</
• </c><00:32:27.679><c> And</c><00:32:27.919><c> one</c><00:32:28.159><c> of</c><00:32:28.240><c> the</
• :32:32.720><c> up</c><00:32:33.120><c> being</c><00:32:33.440><c> packaged</c><00:32:33.840><c> with<
• :32:40.080><c> it's</c><00:32:40.399><c> because</c><00:32:40.559><c> you</c><00:32:40.799><c> you're

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:35.279><c> this</c><00:32:35.440><c> wet</c><00:32:35.840><c> signature</c><00:32:36.320><
• </c><00:32:40.000><c> form</c><00:32:40.240><c> that</c><00:32:40.399><c> would</c><00:32:40.559><c>
• > Um,</c><00:32:44.799><c> and</c><00:32:45.039><c> it</c><00:32:45.279><c> just</c><00:32:45.440><c>
• </c><00:32:48.880><c> And</c><00:32:49.039><c> as</c><00:32:49.200><c> I</c><00:32:49.360><c> opened<
• ><c> I</c><00:32:52.720><c> had</c><00:32:52.880><c> a</c><00:32:53.039><c> lot</c><00:32:53.120><c>

Committee: House Executive Departments and Administration

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first held a public hearing and then an executive session on Senate Bill 401, which DHHS described as a cleanup bill. Testimony from the department explained that the bill would repeal obsolete reporting requirements tied to a repealed municipal reimbursement program and to the now-repealed commission on demographic trends. No one testified in opposition, and the committee voted 12-0 ought to pass, placing the bill on the consent calendar. The committee then heard Senate Bill 402, which would eliminate certain non-compete agreements for physician associates going forward. Senator Gray introduced the bill, and a representative of the New Hampshire Society of Physician Associates said it would improve workforce recruitment and access to care without changing scope of practice or affecting existing agreements. Committee members asked about the length of current restrictions and whether the change would make New Hampshire more attractive to PAs. The committee voted 12-0 ought to pass and sent the bill to the consent calendar. Next, the committee took up Senate Bill 426, which would repeal the permissible fireworks committee. Senator Uler and the deputy state fire marshal said the committee’s original purpose had been overtaken by later changes adopting federal fireworks standards, and that the fire marshal now has the necessary authority. The committee voted 12-0 ought to pass and placed the bill on the consent calendar. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 469, a DMV modernization bill allowing electronic signatures in place of wet signatures for certain motor vehicle title and registration processes. Senator Lang, Carvana, the New Hampshire Auto Dealers Association, Copart, and DMV staff all supported the measure, saying it would reduce delays, errors, and paperwork burdens. Members asked about AI, consumer protections, costs, and how electronic signatures would work in practice, including in cases involving deceased owners. The transcript cuts off during that hearing before any committee action on SB 469.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:00.720><c> The</c><00:32:01.120><c> Nobles</c><00:32:01.600><c> County,</c><00:32:02.480><
• </c><00:32:03.519><c> expenses</c><00:32:04.080><c> in</c><00:32:04.320><c> front</c><00:32:04.399><c
• ><c> uh</c><00:32:05.840><c> much</c><00:32:06.080><c> of</c><00:32:06.240><c> it</c><00:32:06.480><c
• > is</c><00:32:06.960><c> have</c><00:32:07.120><c> have</c><00:32:07.679><c> come</c><00:32:07.840><
• ><c> the</c><00:32:08.960><c> last</c><00:32:09.519><c> uh</c><00:32:10.320><c> uh</c><00:32:10.559><

Bills: HF3700 , HF3982 , HF3927 , HF3933 , HF3949 , HF4238 , HF4275 , HF4476 , HF4504

Committee: House Capital Investment

Keywords: Duluth, Lake Superior Zoo, capital improvements, funding, bonds, appropriations, capital investment, port development, grant caps, state assistance, navigation facilities, Dakota County, state bonds, park improvements, infrastructure, transportation, safety, congestion, water infrastructure, bond issuance

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:32:14.960><c> Now,</c><00:32:15.279><c> if</c><00:32:15.600><c> something</c><00:32:15.840><c
• ,</c><00:32:17.440><c> if</c><00:32:17.679><c> there</c><00:32:17.840><c> was</c><00:32:17.919><c> a<
• :19.200><c> or</c><00:32:19.600><c> some</c><00:32:19.840><c> sort</c><00:32:20.000><c> of</c><00:32:
• > a</c><00:32:31.279><c> fall</c><00:32:31.679><c> or</c><00:32:31.919><c> something</c><00:32:32.159
• ><c> of</c><00:32:57.279><c> what</c><00:32:57.440><c> are</c><00:32:57.519><c> they</c><00:32:57.760

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Committee to Study Long-Term Managed Care met to approve prior minutes and outline its schedule, with meetings set for September 24 and September 29 ahead of an October 1 report deadline. The chair said the committee would use the first two meetings to digest testimony, likely ask follow-up questions of DHS, and then work toward conclusions and a report format. The minutes from the previous meeting were approved unanimously. The main testimony came from Sharon Alexander of Amera Health, who argued in favor of moving from fee-for-service Medicaid long-term services and supports to a managed LTSS model. She described managed LTSS as a capitated, quality-driven system used in about 26 states, and said it can improve care coordination, accountability, access to home- and community-based services, and budget predictability. She cited Amera Health’s experience in Pennsylvania and Delaware, including care coordination, housing and transportation support, caregiver programs, and quality benchmarks tied to state oversight. She also said nursing facilities would remain an important option for people who need that level of care. Committee members asked about how the programs are administered, how rates are set, how care managers work, and how quality is measured. Alexander said states contract with managed care organizations at actuarially sound capitated rates, with annual contracts, reporting, and oversight. She explained that care managers typically conduct quarterly assessments and follow up after trigger events such as hospitalization, and that housing coordinators may assist with transitions to the community. On quality, she said states use CMS-related and HCBS benchmark measures covering service timeliness, care planning, transitions, and other outcomes, and that New Hampshire could build on existing metrics rather than starting from scratch. She also noted that rural areas face workforce and transportation challenges, which managed care plans try to address through technology and self-direction options.

Transcript Highlights:

• &gt;&gt; I So,<00:32:02.880><c> House</c><00:32:03.120><c> Bill</c><00:32:03.679><c> 188</c><00:32:04.000
• ><c> with</c><00:32:04.240><c> 18</c><00:32:04.640><c> yes</c><00:32:04.880><c> votes</c><00:32:05.120
• </c><00:32:13.600><c> And</c><00:32:13.840><c> the</c><00:32:14.080><c> last</c><00:32:14.320><c> item
• ><c> 143</c><00:32:19.120><c> which</c><00:32:19.360><c> is</c><00:32:19.519><c> an</c><00:32:20.159>
• </c><00:32:22.000><c> So</c><00:32:22.240><c> I'll</c><00:32:22.960><c> turn</c><00:32:23.200><c> the

Committee: House Judiciary

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And<00:32:00.880><c> that's</c><00:32:01.039><c> that's</c><00:32:01.360><c> the</c><00:32:01.600><c>
• Is<00:32:02.720><c> that</c><00:32:03.039><c> somebody</c><00:32:03.360><c> who</c><00:32:03.600><c>
• ><c> in</c><00:32:05.679><c> a</c><00:32:05.840><c> supervisorial</c><00:32:06.559><c> role</c><00:32
• </c><00:32:27.200><c> And</c><00:32:27.679><c> again,</c><00:32:28.000><c> this</c><00:32:28.159><c>
• :32:37.519><c> of</c><00:32:37.760><c> something</c><00:32:38.000><c> as</c><00:32:38.240><c> heinous

Committee: House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• ><00:32:39.240><c> to</c><00:32:39.360><c> use</c><00:32:39.600><c> up</c><00:32:39.799><c> the</c><00
• </c><00:32:45.960><c> so</c><00:32:46.440><c> The</c><00:32:46.600><c> Unofficial</c><00:32:47.320><c
• 32:51.320><c> um</c><00:32:51.440><c> for</c><00:32:51.600><c> fiscal</c><00:32:51.960><c> year</c> is
• </c><00:32:52.880><c> we</c><00:32:52.960><c> are</c><00:32:53.120><c> still</c><00:32:53.360><c> in<
• 01:32:07.119><c> on</c><01:32:07.280><c> the</c><01:32:07.520><c> coasts</c><01:32:08.320><c> east</c

Committee: Senate Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Keywords: 1187, senate, all