Transcript Highlights:

• And so this is a response to feedback as I've gotten more and more feedback from members of the legislature
• And so this is a response to feedback as I've gotten more and more feedback from members of the legislature
• And so this is a response to feedback as I've gotten more and more feedback from members of the legislature
• I we have to find a mechanism to do that. So, and I don't think this bill will do it.
• We have to find a mechanism to do that. So, and I don't think this bill will do it.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that people helping me with the feedback that people helping me with the kids<00:24:16.559><c> not</
• I mean, I don't know if they're going back into history in terms of these mechanisms in place, and I
• can't really speak to those mechanisms.
• I can't really speak to those mechanisms I can't really speak to those mechanisms but<01:41:21.360><c
• I just wanted to get their feedback.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures, beginning with SB 48 SD2 HD1 relating to combat sports. The Attorney General offered a technical comment on the bill’s effective date, and several testifiers from the combat sports community strongly supported the measure with amendments. They argued that boxing and MMA should be treated separately, that the current regulatory structure has made events too costly and reduced opportunities, and that more local oversight would help revive the sport and give youth a constructive outlet. Committee members questioned whether the bill’s medical staffing requirements would apply to boxing, MMA, or both, and whether the added requirements would increase costs and reduce access. The witness from the combat sports community said amateur boxing is already regulated through USA Boxing, that the DCCA should focus on professional boxing, and that for safety he would support two physicians and one ambulance for boxing and MMA events. The committee then took up SB 117 SD2 HD1 relating to transportation. The Department of Transportation and the Ulon Initiative testified in support, and the bicycling community was listed as supporting as well. Members focused on the bill’s rebate program for electric transportation devices, asking how successful it had been and whether removing the rebate would affect use. DOT said the program began in February 2023 and had issued about 500 rebates totaling roughly $166,000, aimed at helping people without vehicles access transportation options. The department explained that the bill would broaden access and increase the rebate amount, including additional assistance for low-income applicants. Finally, the committee heard SB 897 SD3 HD1 relating to energy and wildfire liability. The Division of Consumer Advocacy, the Public Utilities Commission, the Attorney General, Clearway Energy Group, Ulon Initiative, Kawai K, IBEW Local 1260, and Hawaiian Electric all testified in support, while the Hawaii Association for Justice was listed as opposed but not present. Supporters said the bill would help finance wildfire mitigation and infrastructure improvements through securitization, reduce wildfire risk, and address utility cost and credit concerns. Hawaiian Electric emphasized that the bill is forward-looking, would help protect customers from future wildfire-related cost increases, and requested amendments including a study on a future wildfire recovery fund. In questioning, members pressed Hawaiian Electric on the liability cap, asking whether it would have applied to the Maui wildfires and whether it would cover personal injury or wrongful death; the witness and company counsel clarified that the aggregate cap applies only to qualifying property damage, not personal injury or wrongful death, and said they would follow up on how the cap would calculate in a Maui-type event. Hawaiian Electric also said it would seek financing under the bill if enacted and updated members on settlement funding efforts, including raising the first $550 million in equity and divesting assets to help meet its obligations.

Transcript Highlights:

• We do use the phrase funding mechanism.
• We do use the phrase funding mechanism.
• We do use the phrase funding mechanism.
• We do use the phrase funding mechanism.
• We do use the phrase funding mechanism.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The discussion focused on a cannabis legalization/regulation bill and whether it should be retained for further study or moved forward. Members debated the fiscal impact, with one side emphasizing that the bill would cost about $7.1 million in the first two years before generating revenue, while supporters argued the House should make a statement in favor of legalization despite likely opposition from the Senate and governor. There was also disagreement over strategy: some said retaining the bill until closer to the next election would give the issue more visibility, while others said delaying would only avoid sending a bill the Senate was unlikely to take up anyway. A major point of contention was whether cannabis should be regulated by a new cannabis commission or placed under the Liquor Commission. Supporters of the Liquor Commission argued it already has enforcement infrastructure, especially for age restrictions, and could handle cannabis more efficiently without creating a new bureaucracy. Opponents said cannabis is a different industry that would require specialized expertise, and they objected to expanding the Liquor Commission, which they described as unpopular and costly. The committee also discussed past versions of the bill, including concerns about limited licenses and the perception that the earlier approach favored large businesses. Members reviewed specific provisions such as licensing fees, THC limits, and cultivation categories. One member noted a $10,000 fee for retail cannabis stores and cannabis product manufacturers authorized to perform extractions, while a smaller tier-one cultivator fee was described as a lower-cost option for small growers. There was also discussion of whether the bill would allow sales through general retail outlets or only dedicated cannabis stores, and whether plants and seeds were covered. No final vote or action was clearly recorded in the excerpt, but the main procedural question was whether to retain the bill for more work or advance it as written.

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 179, through its phase-out mechanism, primarily benefits small and medium-sized businesses.
• , as this mechanism has elements that take into account ability to pay.
• </c> mechanisms, as this mechanism has mechanisms, as this mechanism has elements<00:43:43.160><c> that
• These requests align with feedback that we've received from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency.
• These requests<01:02:29.200><c> align</c><01:02:29.480><c> with</c><01:02:29.600><c> feedback</c><01:

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , it may be, you know, any be mechanics, it may be, you know, any type<00:47:05.760><c> of</c><00:47:
• Um, the feedback from school psychologists is that they're swamped, and there are districts with only
• So, we've gotten quite a bit of feedback and support for the initial bill. Chair.
• from the Kentucky Department of feedback from the Kentucky Department of Education<01:27:53.679><c>
• and support um for the initial feedback and support um for the initial bill. bill. bill.

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's necessary because of the funding mechanism.
• </c><00:03:18.239><c> It's</c> because of the funding mechanism.
• It's because of the funding mechanism.
• from all kinds of different stakeholders and incorporate that feedback.
• Certainly, all of the feedback.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Based off of the stakeholder feedback we've received, I'll start with Southwest.
• Based off of the stakeholder feedback we've received, I'll start with Southwest.
• , and take that feedback and present you an implementation plan at your September Water Topics Overview
• , The goal would be, after we go through the basin-hosted meetings and all the public feedback, that
• That would be an implementation plan for the September Water Topics, get your feedback there, and then

Summary: The Water Topics Overview Committee met to receive interim status updates on several water-related studies and Department of Water Resources projects. The committee approved the March 26, 2026 minutes, observed a moment of silence for the late Representative Conmy, and then heard updates on the watershed management study and the stormwater/wastewater study. Staff reported that the committee had already received the testimony contemplated in the study plans, including input from state agencies, local governments, and out-of-state entities, and that any further action would be at the committee’s discretion. The Department of Water Resources then provided project and budget updates on NAWS and the Southwest Pipeline Project. Reese reported NAWS is expected to serve about 81,000 users, with a total projected cost of about $571 million and about $96 million remaining, while the Southwest Pipeline Project is estimated at $1.06 billion total with about $409 million remaining. Members asked about funding sources, capacity needs, and whether current and future construction is being designed for increased demand; department staff said current work is designed for ultimate capacity, but some future components may need redesign based on new requests. The committee also discussed local cost shares, Minot’s role in NAWS funding, and whether the system is adequate for peak demand. A major portion of the meeting focused on the department’s cash management, carryover, and long-term water funding outlook. The department said Resources Trust Fund revenues are tied to oil extraction taxes and are affected by stripper well exemptions and future oil price declines. Members expressed concern about large carryover balances and whether the state is obligating more money than can realistically be spent in a biennium. The department reported about $340.6 million in remaining carryover and said it is trying to reduce that through a two-tier pre-construction/construction process and closer project vetting. The department also summarized the Deloitte studies on regional governance and finance and on cost-share policy. Stakeholders generally favored keeping the current governance structures for NAWS and Southwest with improvements, while Red River stakeholders leaned toward a different option; the department said it will bring an implementation plan back in September. On cost share, Deloitte’s recommendations would reduce some percentages, prioritize projects differently, and use other measures to close a projected long-term funding gap. Members debated affordability, local burden, deferred maintenance, and whether statutory changes may be needed to allow the commission more flexibility in prioritizing and funding projects. No formal votes or final actions were taken beyond approving the minutes and receiving the updates.

Transcript Highlights:

• I've given them our complete feedback regarding the bill, but in the interest of time, I'll try to hit
• Candidates receive. hands-on practice and real-time feedback.
• And I think the beauty of this bill is this really does provide a fund mechanism.
• A funding mechanism and a pathway to really meet this moment.
• Teachers have equally glowing feedback.

Bills: SB451, SB762, SB1490, SB1262, SB1459, SB1750, SB1962, SB2252, SB2253, SB2365

Keywords: instructional materials, public schools, Education Code, adoption, rejected materials, local funds, open educational resources, Texas Education Code, school districts, open enrollment charter schools, funding restrictions, environmental regulation, business compliance, local authority, economic development, state preemption, local control, open education resources, SB 762, Texas public schools

Transcript Highlights:

• We'd like to have more feedback.
• You can't keep giving us feedback. You can't give us the information.
• What would be a practical way for us to get the feedback?
• But how do we get that feedback?
• And I may need to be educated on what those applications. grants are and how that mechanism for them

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:09:20.800><c> for</c><00:09:21.079><c> responding</c> Title 9 and a mechanism for responding
• We also just wanted to make sure we had as much of the institutional feedback and stakeholder feedback
• We also wanted to make sure we had as much of the institutional feedback and stakeholder feedback implemented
• We wanted to make sure we had as much of the institutional feedback and stakeholder feedback implemented
• So I appreciate the feedback. I appreciate that.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Any instant... ...reactions to that feedback?
• This is because students are not taught basic coping mechanisms, not taught how to manage time effectively
• The first phase will also be an opportunity for student and parent feedback to further improve the program
• state can achieve mental health literacy through the proper introduction of life skills and coping mechanisms
• So to address the rubric comment, I mean, thank you so much for your feedback.

Summary: The joint Senate and Assembly Education Committee hearing featured opening remarks from legislators welcoming students from the California Association of Student Councils and SABLE, with members emphasizing student voice and noting that several past student proposals had become law. The hearing then moved through multiple student panels presenting policy ideas, with members responding in a mix of support, technical questions, and cautions about cost, implementation, and tradeoffs in instructional time. The first panel proposed an annual civic engagement day for grades 7-12 to increase civic literacy and participation through flexible school-based activities. Members asked about costs, flexibility for sixth grade, voter registration, and how the proposal would fit within existing curriculum and standards. The second panel proposed amending Education Code Section 35012 to require at least one student board member in every unified and high school district, with added motioning rights and training on budgeting and LCAPs; members raised concerns about mandate costs, board size, and the scope of motioning authority. The third panel proposed middle school financial literacy instruction, potentially embedded in existing classes like math, with a 10-year phase-in for teacher training and curriculum updates; members questioned whether the state should wait for the already-approved high school financial literacy course to be implemented first. The fourth panel proposed expanding restorative justice by creating a CDE task force and authorizing PPS-certified staff to use restorative justice materials in discipline processes; members discussed prior legislation, confidentiality in expulsion hearings, and the likely cost of a state task force. The fifth panel proposed short, twice-a-semester mental health and life-skills sessions for grades 7-12, but members expressed skepticism that brief classroom sessions could meaningfully address mental health needs and suggested wellness centers or student-led awareness efforts instead. The hearing then began panel six on AI implementation in classrooms, with students arguing that districts need clearer guidance on AI use and that education must adapt rather than ignore the technology.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any instant reactions to that feedback? Yeah.
• This is because students are not taught basic coping mechanisms, not taught how to manage time effectively
• The first phase will also be an opportunity for student and parent feedback to further improve the program
• state can achieve mental health literacy through the proper introduction of life skills and coping mechanisms
• So to address the rubric comment, I mean, thank you so much for your feedback.

Summary: The Senate and Assembly Education Committees held their annual joint hearing with the California Association of Student Councils and SABLE, where student delegates presented policy ideas developed over two days. Committee members repeatedly praised student voice and noted that several past student proposals had become law. The hearing began with opening remarks from legislators and student organizers, who emphasized the importance of civic participation and the value of hearing directly from students. The chair also reviewed hearing rules and explained that the panels would be treated as peers in a formal policy discussion. The first panel proposed an annual civic engagement day for grades 7-12, with flexible activities such as mock elections, civic fairs, Socratic seminars, and public comment practice. Members asked about costs, grade-level flexibility, voter registration, and how the proposal would fit within existing curriculum time. The second panel proposed amending Education Code Section 35012 to require at least one student board member in every unified and high school district, with expanded training and motion rights. Legislators supported the concept but raised technical concerns about fiscal impact, the need for odd-numbered boards, the scope of motioning authority, and whether districts would need reimbursement if the mandate became statewide. A third panel proposed adding middle school financial literacy instruction by embedding it into existing classes, with curriculum and teacher training developed over time by state agencies. Members questioned how it would fit into adopted materials and whether the state should wait until the new high school financial literacy course is fully implemented before designing middle school instruction. The fourth panel proposed expanding restorative justice by creating a CDE task force and authorizing PPS-certified staff to use restorative justice training materials in discipline processes. Senators discussed prior legislation, confidentiality concerns in closed-session hearings, and the fiscal cost of a state task force, while expressing support for stronger restorative practices. The final panel proposed more active mental health education through short, twice-semester classroom sessions for grades 7-12 focused on coping skills, time management, and awareness of resources. Assemblymember Castillo and Senator Cortese questioned whether teachers and counselors could effectively deliver the program, whether it would duplicate or overburden existing efforts, and whether wellness centers or student-led awareness efforts might be more effective. Committee members generally agreed the topic was important but were skeptical that another curriculum mandate was the best solution, and no votes or formal actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any instant reactions to that feedback? that schedule to come online in two years.
• This is because students are not taught basic coping mechanisms, not taught how to manage time effectively
• The first phase will also be an opportunity for student and parent feedback to further improve the program
• state can achieve mental health literacy through the proper introduction of life skills and coping mechanisms
• So to address the rubric comment, I mean, thank you so much for your feedback.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The joint Senate and Assembly Education Committees held their annual hearing with the California Association of Student Councils and SABLE, featuring student-led policy proposals. Opening remarks from legislators emphasized the importance of student voice and noted that student ideas have previously become law. Committee members also explained hearing procedures and framed the students as peers in a formal policy discussion. The first panel proposed an annual civic engagement day for schools, with flexible activities by grade level to build civic literacy, discussion skills, and participation in voting and local government. Members asked about cost, flexibility for sixth grade, possible voter registration components, and how to measure effectiveness. The second panel proposed requiring at least one student board member in every unified and high school district, with added training and motioning rights. Legislators raised concerns about whether districts would need additional board seats, the fiscal impact of making the requirement statewide, and how to define student motioning authority. The third panel proposed expanding financial literacy into middle school, potentially by embedding it into existing classes such as math, with teacher training and curriculum updates over a 10-year timeline. Members questioned how the content would fit into existing courses and whether the state should wait for the new high school financial literacy course to be fully implemented before designing middle school instruction. The fourth panel proposed strengthening restorative justice by creating a CDE task force and authorizing PPS-certified staff to use restorative justice training materials and participate in discipline processes; Senator Cortese discussed prior legislation, confidentiality concerns, and the likely cost of a state task force. The fifth panel proposed short, twice-a-semester mental health and life-skills sessions for grades 7-12. Members, including a licensed therapist and other legislators, questioned whether brief classroom lessons could effectively address mental health needs, suggested wellness centers and student-led awareness efforts as alternatives, and expressed skepticism that the proposal would achieve its intended outcomes as a state mandate.

Transcript Highlights:

• Any instant reactions to that feedback?
• This is because students are not taught basic coping mechanisms, not taught how to manage time effectively
• The first phase will also be an opportunity for student and parent feedback to further improve the program
• state can achieve mental health literacy through the proper introduction of life skills and coping mechanisms
• So to address the rubric comment, I mean, thank you so much for your feedback.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But the experimental mechanism allows the PSC to have the ability to conduct limited-scope pilot programs
• It's my understanding... ...for through the experimental mechanism. Thank you for that question.
• Appreciate your feedback and your debate and your words.
• Appreciate your feedback and your debate and your words.
• Michelle, please call the roll and see us for SB 612. it, but I really appreciate the feedback and ask

Summary: The committee took up a series of criminal justice, health, and public safety bills, with several measures reported favorably after brief sponsor presentations and mostly no opposition. CS for SB 1782 on dangerous excessive speeding, CS for SB 306 on Medicaid provider network access, CS for SB 716 on mandatory minimums for certain sexual offenses by registered offenders, CS for SB 1084 on intimate image dissemination and digitally forged images, and CS for CS for SB 1604 on corrections-related litigation and sentencing changes all passed the committee. Members also approved CS for SB 1838, which increases protections for court officials from tampering, harassment, and retaliation, and CS for SB 1252, which directs FDLE to study a statewide pawn data database. CS for SB 468 on fleeing or eluding, CS for SB 490 on off-duty concealed carry for certain officers, and CS for SB 890 on blood clot screening and treatment also received favorable votes, with SB 890 drawing supportive testimony from the bill sponsor, medical and patient advocates, and family members affected by blood clots. The most extensive debate centered on CS for CS for SB 1804, which would create a capital offense for adults trafficking children under 12 or mentally incapacitated persons for sexual exploitation. Senator Martin defended the bill as a response to especially heinous crimes and argued it fit within constitutional punishment principles, while several members raised concerns about the Eighth Amendment, the risk of lengthy and costly litigation, and the possibility of retraumatizing victims. The Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers testified in opposition, citing moral objections, due process concerns, and constitutional precedent; the bill nevertheless was reported favorably. The committee also approved CS for CS for SB 572, the “Pam Rock Act,” which tightens dangerous-dog rules, adds enclosure, microchip, insurance, and penalty requirements, and allows stronger enforcement actions after serious attacks. The Rock family and animal control supporters testified in favor, describing the bill as a response to fatal dog attacks and urging stronger accountability for owners. For SB 572, members discussed insurance requirements, the role of local authorities in classifying dangerous dogs, and whether the bill would affect ordinary pet insurance or only liability coverage after a serious attack. The sponsor said the measure is not breed-specific and is aimed at dogs that have already caused significant harm. The committee also heard testimony from family members of Pam Rock and other victims, along with supporters from animal control and sheriff’s offices. All of the bills taken up in the meeting that were voted on were reported favorably, and no roll-call votes failed.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so one of the things I've wondered is, should there be a more mechanical way of figuring that out
• Okay, do you want to explain a little bit, mechanically, how that works?
• Okay, do you want to, will you explain a little bit like mechanically how that works?
• On the second question, I love all of that feedback.
• From a state perspective, I think as a sponsor, All of that feedback.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are putting together a key informant stakeholder list, and we will be hosting monthly feedback meetings
• We are putting together a key informant stakeholder list, and we will be hosting monthly feedback meetings
• over the summer to try to, And we will be hosting monthly feedback meetings over the summer to try to
• So just to provide some feedback, we see that problem, and so we're trying to see if we can do something
• I think there are serious opportunities for us to use the mechanisms that you have to keep our small

Summary: The Consumer Protection & Business Committee held public hearings on two bills. House Bill 2616, described as an agriculturally resilient markets act, would create a broad package of agriculture-related policies and appropriations, including a strategy to expand state purchasing of Washington-grown food, temporary packaging and emissions exemptions for certain agricultural uses, changes to labor notice rules for agricultural and dairy layoffs, several grant and study programs, a transfer of cannabis production/processing/testing oversight to the Department of Agriculture, and an appropriation for the tree fruit leadership program. Representative Christine Reeves said the bill was intended as a state-level “farm bill” to address farm losses, food security, and regulatory burdens, and she emphasized stakeholder input and the need to support family farms and farmworker well-being. Testimony on HB 2616 was overwhelmingly supportive, with growers, commodity groups, dairy and potato representatives, and other agricultural stakeholders arguing that Washington farms face low margins, high regulatory and labor costs, refrigeration and processing challenges, and competition from foreign producers. Several speakers said the bill’s exemptions, grants, and studies would help keep farms viable and preserve local food production. Committee members asked about stakeholder outreach, the role of Washington State University and commodity commissions, the impact of federal versus state policy, and possible ways to reduce compliance burdens. The hearing ended without a vote, and the chair noted the bill was after cutoff and would not move this year, but that stakeholder meetings would continue over the summer. The committee then heard House Bill 2721, which would create a registration system for commercial interior designers, expand and rename the Board of Architects, set education, examination, and experience requirements, define the scope of practice, require seals and technical submission attestations, and establish penalties and a fee account. Supporters from interior design organizations said the bill would recognize a profession already performing code- and safety-related work in commercial spaces, align Washington with other states and national model law standards, and remove barriers to ownership and advancement, especially for women. Testifiers also said the bill would clarify responsibility for life safety, accessibility, and non-structural interior construction in schools, health care, and public buildings. The committee heard only supportive testimony, but members raised questions about how the profession compares with architecture, the impact of delaying the bill until 2027, and demographic diversity in the field. The chair closed the hearing noting the bill would not advance this session and that further interim work would be needed.

Transcript Highlights:

• Our objections lie not with the intent of this bill, but with the mechanisms for pursuing it.
• How will this program include community feedback to ensure buy-in for opening a new grocery store, i.e
• ., possible provisions that would give communities the opportunity to provide feedback on what type of
• gro... ...provisions that would give communities the opportunity to provide feedback on what type of
• I want to make sure that we have that community feedback in a way that makes everyone happy.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Agriculture heard three bills. SB 18 by Senator Rubio would create a Food Desert Elimination Grant Program at CDFA to help open or improve grocery stores in food desert communities. Supporters said it would improve access to healthy food, create jobs, and help underserved neighborhoods; opponents argued it could favor large chains, lacked community input and accountability, and should better prioritize tribal, BIPOC-owned, and community-led retail. Committee members raised concerns about population thresholds, community engagement, and long-term commitments, and the author said the bill could be strengthened with guardrails. SB 18 passed 7-0 and was sent to Appropriations. SB 312 by Senator Umberg would require out-of-state shippers of dogs to electronically submit health certificates to CDFA and make them available to buyers and enforcement agencies, aiming to improve consumer protection and traceability in the puppy import pipeline. Supporters from animal welfare and humane organizations said the bill would help stop sick or misrepresented puppies from entering California and give investigators a central record. Members asked about privacy and enforcement, and the author indicated amendments could address consumer privacy concerns. The bill passed unanimously and was sent to Appropriations. SB 493 by Senator Becker would change how compensation is set for secretary managers of district agricultural associations and fairgrounds, shifting salary-setting authority to CDFA and requiring periodic salary surveys. Supporters said fairgrounds are critical emergency-response and community facilities and that the bill would help recruit and retain qualified leaders with fairer pay. Some members expressed concern about local control and appointment delays, but clarified the bill only addressed salary, not appointments. SB 493 also passed unanimously and was sent to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• Accountability mechanisms need further clarity, and consistent community voice and shared decision-making
• And I guess what is the mechanism to get kids all over the state that want to focus?
• Some of the challenges, and again, this is feedback from our members, I'll go to the second bullet point
• I wanted to collect the feedback that has been relevant in the last four months because, as we all know
• To your point about community colleges, there are these mechanisms called articulation agreements, and

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Accountability mechanisms need further clarity, and consistent community voice and shared decision-making
• And I guess what is the mechanism to get kids all over the state that want to focus?
• And this is just some qualitative feedback that we have from our members.
• I wanted to collect the feedback that has been relevant in the last four months because, as we all know
• To your point about community colleges, there are these mechanisms called articulation agreements, and

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Arts, Entertainment, Sports, and Tourism and the Assembly Education Committee held a joint informational hearing on implementation of Proposition 28, the 2022 voter-approved arts education funding measure. Chairs emphasized the goal of understanding how the roughly $900 million to nearly $1.1 billion annual funding stream is being used, whether it is supplementing rather than supplanting existing arts programs, and what reporting or guidance improvements may be needed. The Legislative Analyst’s Office reviewed the basic structure of Prop 28: funds are distributed 70% by enrollment and 30% by low-income student counts, 80% must generally be spent on staffing, districts may use up to 1% for administration, and annual local reports and audits are required. Members pressed the LAO on waivers, spending timelines, and whether smaller or rural districts face different challenges; the LAO said some waivers have been issued and that districts have three years to spend each allocation, but statewide data remain limited. WestEd, Create California, and the California County Superintendents described early implementation findings and concerns. Their testimony said schools are using funds for arts materials, staffing, expanded instruction, and field trips, and that many respondents saw positive effects on student access and engagement. At the same time, they reported confusion about allowable uses, supplement-versus-supplant rules, and the 80/20 staffing requirement, along with shortages of credentialed arts teachers and uneven access across districts. Create California argued that Prop 28 has generated optimism but also uncertainty, especially for community arts organizations that have seen reduced contracts as districts bring services in-house. County superintendents and researchers called for clearer statutory guidance, stronger technical assistance, better statewide data, and more support for teacher credentialing pathways. District and county officials then described local implementation. Long Beach Unified said it moved quickly to full implementation, using Prop 28 to expand elementary and secondary arts offerings, hire 56 certificated staff and more than 120 classified coaches, and develop a five-year arts strategic plan tied to equity goals. Butte County and other rural representatives said Prop 28 has enabled restored or expanded programs, including arts teachers, theater, and music offerings, but rural districts still struggle to recruit credentialed staff and to make small allocations workable across large distances. The California Music Educators Association echoed those themes, saying members report both new positions and supplies as well as confusion, fear of audit findings, and inconsistent district guidance. Committee members asked about arts definitions, credentialing, rural pooling of funds, and out-of-state teacher credentials; witnesses said media arts are included, multiple credential pathways exist, and recent legislation has eased some out-of-state credential barriers. The hearing ended with public comment beginning after the panel discussions.