Video & Transcript Research : 'bond database'

Page 36 of 340
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WLA-EDU, EDU Public Hearings 02-18-2026

Water, Land, Culture and the Arts

Transcript Highlights:
  • Otherwise, the property tax holders and bond issue won't approve it.
  • Otherwise, the property tax holders and bond issue won't approve it.
  • Otherwise, the property tax holders and bond issue won't approve it.
  • with, you know, in short-term bonds versus just saying no can, right?
  • with, you know, in short-term bonds versus just saying no can, right?
Bills: SB2003
Summary: The joint committees on Water, Land, Culture, and the Arts and Education heard testimony and discussed SB 20003, which would require the auditor’s report under Act 255 to include a recommendation on whether the Monarch Stewardship and Oversight Authority is fit to continue managing Monaca lands. Testimony focused on the bill’s reversion language, the role of the auditor, and whether the measure gave the auditor too much discretion without clear criteria. The Office of the Auditor’s position, read into the record, was that it had strong reservations because the bill did not provide standards for assessing fitness and asked that the requirement be held or amended. Other testimony suggested a work group with relevant agencies and Hawaiian practitioners to manage the transition and reduce conflict. Committee members debated whether the bill should simply restore the original reversion language or also require an audit-based fitness determination. Several members questioned the need for a 2031 audit when Act 255 already provides for a performance and financial audit in 2031 and noted that the bill could shift authority away from the legislature. In response, the committee chair explained that the measure was intended to restore language removed during conference and to address the transition back to the University of Hawaii if the authority was not meeting the act’s purpose. The committees ultimately recommended SB 20003 be passed with amendments. The amendments would strike the auditor/audit section, add language addressing timelines by providing a 10-year lease extension and sublease extension, and make technical changes including a defective date. The committees voted to adopt the amended measure and send it forward as an SD1. The transcript also included a separate Education Committee hearing on SB 3286, which would require the University of Hawaii to develop a facilities and student housing master plan and report to the legislature. University of Hawaii testimony said the system supports the intent but that the bill’s requirements are a heavy lift across 10 campuses and should follow development of a broader academic strategy. Members raised concerns about deferred maintenance, shifting priorities, and the lack of a systemwide plan, while the university said it already has a six-year capital improvement plan but acknowledged it does not fully incorporate the broader academic and housing strategy the bill contemplates.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Administrative Rules Jan 21st, 2026 at 12:00 pm

Administrative Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • It goes into an aggregate database, and we look at... Systems level issues.
  • So, with that, does this particular board have its own database?
  • that you Do your own checks and balances with regard to the national database?
  • So, I don't know about a national database. I can tell you the state of Oklahoma.
  • So, when they're licensed through LEAT, they have a Database. It's almost like a police officer.
Keywords: 914, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 02/10/25

Judiciary and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • These are all the criminal history background checks for the state of Minnesota, forward-facing databases
  • :18:53.240> a<00:18:53.360> missing<00:18:53.720> person's<00:18:54.159> database
  • would build a missing person's database would build a missing person's database for<00:18:54.760
  • is no way and no federal database is no way and no federal database currently<00:20:31.120> available
  • committee and I want to the bonding committee and I want to thank<00:26:01.000> uh<00:26:01.120
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 03/02/26

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Second, we want to thank Chair or Vice Chair Kupec for leading a bill to renew bonding authority for
  • And so to that end, one of the things that MFMA is working on is building a database that would help
  • And within that geographic information systems database that we are fielding, we are going to be using
  • building a database that would, um,<00:32:04.159> help<00:32:04.399> us<00:32:04.799><
  • geographic information systems database geographic information systems database that<00:32:19.679
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Mar 19, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Summary: The Committee on Water and Land heard testimony on SB 5253 SD2 relating to conservation and SB 2401 relating to regional shoreline mitigation district, with the chair emphasizing short testimony limits and the need to finish before session. On SB 5253, DLNR said it stood on its written testimony and answered questions about the bill’s proposed nonprofit endangered species sanctuary. Members asked whether existing entities or agreements, such as land trusts, private landowners, and DLNR safe harbor agreements, could accomplish similar conservation goals without creating a new entity. DLNR said similar work already exists, but it was not aware of a comparable sanctuary model in the state. A member also questioned language suggesting for-profit businesses in the sanctuary, and DLNR said the intent appeared to be sales of outreach or similar materials, though it agreed that such activities could be handled by a nonprofit. The bulk of the hearing focused on SB 2401, which would create a regional shoreline adaptation/mitigation framework. The Department of the Attorney General said it had concerns about inconsistent use of the terms “mitigation” and “adaptation,” warning of possible title-subject issues. DLNR said it was neutral on the terminology and more concerned with the substance, and noted that the bill would not waive permits; any plan would still require environmental review and applicable state and county permits. DLNR also supported OHA’s recommendation to consider impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during regional planning, and said the bill’s language on temporary shoreline protection measures could help address the gap between emergency permits and longer-term planning while avoiding a hardening-only approach. The Office of Planning supported the regional planning concept but noted it is not a regulatory agency and would need to work with DLNR and the Land Board. OHA supported the bill’s planning-based approach but recommended amendments to require assessment of impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during plan development and to clarify that environmental review would still apply at the project level. Testifiers from the Ka‘anapali Steering Committee strongly supported the bill, saying it would provide a regional framework for ongoing erosion problems while preserving full regulatory authority and normal permitting, and they proposed amendments to standardize terminology, create a limited pathway for temporary shoreline protection, and address ownership and maintenance responsibilities. Members discussed the meaning of “mitigation” versus “adaptation,” the scope of shoreline hardening, and whether the bill would help the legislature take a broader, more holistic view of shoreline decisions. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

GVO DEFER, AEN-GVO Public Hearings 02-12-2026

Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, we're going to require forfeiture of half the bond amount, not full, as written on page two, line
  • forfeite of So, we're going to require forfeite of half<00:07:21.360> the<00:07:21.599> bond
  • > amount,<00:07:22.319> not<00:07:22.560> full,<00:07:22.800> as half the bond
  • amount, not full, as half the bond amount, not full, as written<00:07:23.360> on<00:07:23.520
Summary: The committee met on February 12, 2026, to take decision-making on measures previously heard earlier in the month. Several bills were deferred indefinitely or set for later discussion, including SB 2064 on the Office of the State Architect, SB 3068 on procurement, and SB 3216 after its contents were moved into another measure. SB 2862 on gubernatorial appointments, SB 2781, and SB 315 were all deferred to Tuesday, February 17 at 3 p.m. in Room 225 for further work. The committee also noted that if technical problems interrupted the meeting, it would reconvene later for outstanding decision-making. The committee passed SB 2343 on the Legislature with amendments incorporating language from SB 3216, technical changes, and a defective date of 2525. SB 2075 was advanced as a Senate draft 1 after amendments responding to constitutional concerns raised by the attorney general and SPO. SB 2927 on procurement was also passed with amendments clarifying debriefing requirements and adding technical changes, and SB 2938 on search and rescue was amended to place the position in Hima rather than the Governor’s office before being adopted. SB 3249 on procurement protests was amended to remove the term "frivolous," reduce the forfeiture to half the bond amount, and note unresolved issues, then adopted. The committee also took up SB 3332 on state-funded travel, amending it to remove certain lines, report travel by position number to protect confidentiality, remove subsection G, and add a defective date of 2525; it was adopted. SB 2929 on public notice was amended into a pilot project for counties with populations between 100,000 and 175,000, with a year-end report to the Legislature, and was adopted. Later, the committee returned to SB 2094 on environmental action levels, heard testimony from the Department of Health in support of its current scientific process and from an environmental caucus witness in strong support of the bill’s transparency and petition provisions, and then deferred decision-making to February 17 at 3 p.m. in Room 225. In the joint hearing portion, SB 3233 on agricultural workforce housing drew generally supportive testimony from ADC, the Farm Bureau, the Chamber of Commerce, the Hawaii Farmers Union, and the State Procurement Office, with concerns focused on clarity, flexibility for smaller farms, and avoiding concentration of benefits in one large operation. The committee ultimately recommended passing SB 3233 with the State Procurement Office’s clarifying amendments and the Hawaii Farmers Union’s amendment to ensure workforce housing incentives benefit multiple farmers, and the measure was adopted.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 9th, 2026 at 06:43 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 165 allows projects that use industrial revenue bonds to also access C-PACE financing.
  • important clarification to ensure that commercial properties operating under an industrial revenue bond
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • from imposing taxes or exercising eminent domain, and it would continue to be authorized to issue bonds
  • In addition, the bill clarifies the authority of these entities to issue revenue bonds to fund these
  • Also, one of them wishes to issue some revenue bonds, and we needed some clarification that they could
  • For their revenue bonds. Okay, is there any questions?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation Apr 24th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • We are bond counsel to the...
  • and not issue new bonds for capital improvements or refunding bonds for savings.
  • Your bond? Were you talking about going through your bond money?
  • of that bond.
  • Two violations of bond covenants which affect all of the bonds if any Texas city has a bond out there
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 15th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Local tools like bond financing assessments.
  • When bond financing is available, just like for water and sewer infrastructure, we can build. these systems
  • The downgrade of Austin's bond rating reflects continued employee pension challenges and expenditure
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 15th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, how much do bonds factor into? Um, let's start with the right.
  • If you were going to divide the rate between the bonds...
  • Can you divide the dollar between the bonds?
  • Okay, again I want to go back to the bonds. Let's do the spending side.
  • I can't say general revenue, just the maintenance and operation versus the bonds of the city.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • When the PUA was first founded, it did not have a great bond rating at its inception.
  • As we've had to upgrade our facilities, we do so by going to the bond market, but we have to manage our
  • After the first five years, I can tell you that that bond rating went up substantially.
  • Since I've been on the board, we've gone to bond once and gotten a whole lot better rates than my county
  • It will be funded solely through the sale of water and wastewater services and may issue bonds for infrastructure
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • comply with school safety mandates this also doesn't include the 2.7 million a year we play pay in our bond
  • Bill 1750 is so important, and like an ISD, I can't call for a bond vote if I need more space for more
  • Charter schools can pledge with their bonds against the Permanent School Fund.
  • There's no local. to tax locally, you can't issue tax-backed bonds like ISDs can, so you've got your