Transcript Highlights:

• Previously, the plans that that we administered, the benefit was calculated based on years of service
• combination of years of service and as well as your age are entitled to this benefit, and that benefit is calculated
• Now, in the calculations that you did...
• That highest average salary is usually calculated over a period of years. done over a longer or shorter

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Great calculation, because in this in this latest art in incarnation, this reading assessment is not
• whether that's demonstrating a passing score motion of 4th grade meeting graduation requirements and calculating
• that must be used in teacher evaluation systems so that so the value got a model or BAM has been calculated
• remains that the end of the year assessments remains most appropriate data point for for the use of calculating

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So I'm just curious if we're still calculating based on this $6 or $7 discount, or is there really another
• I'm just curious if we're still calculating based on this $6 or $7 discount, or is there really another
• This was based on a rough interest calculation through the end of September 2025.
• PRC application, versus spending a longer period of time to produce their income figures, do the calculations
• So there's no order in terms of the calculations.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So I'm just curious if we're still calculating based on this six or seven-dollar...
• I'm just curious if we're still calculating based on this $6 or $7 discount, or is there really another
• This was based on a rough interest calculation through the end of September 2025.
• PRC application, versus spending a longer period of time to produce their income figures, do the calculations
• So there's no order in terms of the calculations.

Summary: The Budget Section approved the March 18 minutes and received an OMB update showing the general fund is still ahead of the budgeted starting point, but revenues through May are now about $76 million below the legislative forecast, driven mainly by individual income tax and sales tax shortfalls. OMB also reported the budget stabilization fund is above its cap, meaning a transfer to the general fund is expected, and reviewed oil price/production assumptions, noting continued volatility. Members asked about the income tax netting process, the sales tax decline, oil price discounts/premiums, natural gas taxation, and when the executive branch would present its revenue forecast. The committee then acted on several Emergency Commission requests. It approved, as a group, requests for federal mine reclamation funds for the Public Service Commission, an additional criminal investigator FTE and funding for the Attorney General’s office, and a DPI transfer for bridge software costs. It separately approved DPI request 2164 for $500,000 to support the food vendor program after debate over whether the program’s savings were known and whether the money was simply a pass-through. OMB also reported on federal grants, fiscal irregularities, tobacco settlement proceeds, budget guidelines for agencies, FTE pool usage, vacancy savings, and the DAPL settlement, noting the settlement funds had been deposited and that a deficiency appropriation may be needed later to cover remaining accrued interest. Tax Commissioner Brian Kroshus presented on the primary residence credit program, saying participation has grown sharply and that the current biennium will likely need about $431 million, roughly $22 million above the appropriation. He explained how the credit interacts with homestead and disabled veteran benefits, how the 3% property tax cap works, and why county valuations and mill rates vary. The committee also received a Legacy Fund/Budget Stabilization Fund report showing strong returns, and DOT Director Ron Henke received approval for two Flex Fund highway projects on ND 49 and ND 31. Henke also explained remaining Highway 85 funding and said the department is exploring uses for leftover state dollars. Finally, the Department of Mineral Resources reported on abandoned well plugging and site restoration, noting North Dakota remains in relatively strong shape compared with other states, and DPI began a presentation on gap funding tied to the 3% levy cap, reporting 24 districts received $1.8 million in the first year and projecting higher future needs.

Transcript Highlights:

• actually got rid of GILTI, replaced it with a new concept that changed how what is now called NCTI is calculated
• would we in Massachusetts continue to include just 5% of these shifted profits in our state tax calculations
• before you would require multinational corporations to include in their Massachusetts state tax calculations
• a corporation's workforce or its capital investments in Massachusetts have no connection to the calculation
• obstacle to Massachusetts including more of these corporate profits in the Commonwealth's tax calculations

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Revenue, chaired by Senator James Eldridge and Representative Adrian Madaro, opened its hearing with a moment of silence for the late Lowell State Senator Ed Kennedy and reviewed hearing procedures and deadlines. The committee then took testimony on several corporate tax bills, including S. 2033/H. 3110 on offshore tax avoidance, H. 3248 on a manufacturing tax exemption, H. 3057 on a tiered corporate minimum tax, and S. 2041 on a corporate tax haven blacklist, along with a separate business interest deduction bill. No votes were taken during the hearing. Supporters of S. 2033/H. 3110, including labor unions, health care workers, educators, public health advocates, seniors, and several legislators, argued that Massachusetts needs new revenue to offset federal cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, health care, education, and other services. They said the bill would raise roughly $400 million annually by increasing the share of offshore profits included in the state tax base from 5% to 50%, and they framed it as a fairness measure that would require large multinational corporations to pay more while leaving most local businesses and workers unaffected. Testimony emphasized risks to MassHealth, PCA services, adult dental care, hospitals, schools, and public health programs if new revenue is not raised. Opponents, including the Mass Taxpayers Foundation and the Council on State Taxation, argued the proposal is poor tax policy and likely unconstitutional because it would tax foreign-source income without allowing foreign tax credits or a comparable apportionment method. They said Massachusetts should take a broader, coordinated approach to federal tax changes rather than a standalone bill, and warned of litigation risk and possible double taxation. Supporters such as MassBudget and former tax counsel Don Griswold countered that the bill is a reasonable rough-justice approach, consistent with federal and neighboring-state treatment, and that it would primarily affect a small number of very large multinationals. On S. 2041, the Global Business Alliance opposed the proposed tax haven blacklist, while supporting a separate bill allowing business interest deductibility.

Transcript Highlights:

• second finding was for the Division of Workforce Services, or DWS, which changed its methodology for calculating
• DWS changed the methodology for its calculations for both the total receivable due back from the overpayments
• We recommend the state work to improve its controls over documentation and related calculations required
• DWS Workforce Services changed its methodology for calculating the year-end estimates, allowing uncollectable
• And based on our calculations, that did not seem like it was a good estimate.

Summary: The Legislative Joint Auditing Committee met on June 5 and first adopted prior minutes and several committee reports. The executive committee report noted adoption of its minutes, staff updates on scheduled audits, approval of an annual financial audit for the City of Horseshoe Bend, and an update on the intern program. The Counties and Municipalities report covered delinquent private water and sewer audits, compliance follow-up with towns including Denning, Gum Springs, Omer, Fargo, Jericho, and Haynes, and review of current and deferred reports; the committee filed most current reports but deferred several and referred some matters to prosecutors and the Attorney General. The Educational Institutions report said 103 education audits were reviewed, most with no findings, while several school districts had findings and one Booneville School District finding was referred to law enforcement. The State Agencies report included findings at the Department of Finance and Administration and a deferred Department of Health report, and the committee filed 13 reports. The committee then received lengthy presentations on the State of Arkansas annual comprehensive financial report and the state single audit for fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Legislative Audit issued unmodified opinions on the state financial statements, but identified two material weaknesses: insufficient internal controls at the Office of State Technology to monitor threats and unauthorized access, and improper methodology changes and documentation issues at the Division of Workforce Services affecting year-end estimates for unemployment-related accounts. The single audit covered $12.4 billion in federal awards across 469 programs, with 16 major programs reviewed. Auditors reported 33 findings overall, including 31 federal findings, $12.9 million in outstanding questioned costs, and qualified opinions for the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer program, the Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund, and the Child Care Development Fund cluster. Committee members questioned DHS, the broadband office, OST, DFA, Education, and Workforce Services about the findings, corrective actions, cyber protections, federal drawdowns, child care reporting, and accounting methodology changes. Several agencies described corrective steps. DHS said it had changed how it draws Summer EBT funds, addressed provider revalidation and incarceration-related Medicaid issues, and updated internal processes and staffing. The broadband office said the questioned costs reflected invoice documentation disputes rather than missing payments and expected Treasury review to resolve the issue. OST said it was expanding logging, endpoint detection, and enterprise monitoring, and described broader cybersecurity investments, training, and a roadmap. DFA and Workforce Services addressed the workers’ compensation and unemployment accounting issues, with Workforce Services saying it had updated its policy and submitted the methodology to DFA. After discussion, the committee voted to hold the two statewide audit reports over until the August meeting, with members asked to submit specific questions in advance so only needed agencies would return. The final item was a special report on the Hot Spring County Solid Waste Authority for January 1, 2023 through June 30, 2025. The audit reviewed compliance with laws, board procedures, bidding, payroll, permits, inspections, and cash handling. It noted prior private audit findings on segregation of duties, that recent private audit reports had not been obtained for 2023 through 2025, and that the current administrator said prior office staff and bookkeeping contractors resigned when he was hired. The authority’s operations and revenue sources were described, and the report was presented for committee review.

Transcript Highlights:

• But doing the calculation, um, the CEO of CenterPoint makes 108.3 times more than the average lineman
• appreciate you bringing this bill forward, and I'm sorry for nerding out on numbers and doing calculations
• for nerding out on numbers<00:28:52.960> and<00:28:53.200> doing<00:28:53.440> calculations
• ,<00:28:54.080> but numbers and doing calculations, but numbers and doing calculations, but

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee heard House File 76, as amended by the adopted A1 amendment, and the chair moved the bill to be re-referred to the general register. The bill would limit the amount investor-owned utilities can charge ratepayers for executive compensation, capping recoverable pay for the top 10 executives at the governor’s salary. Representative Greenman argued the measure would protect customers from paying for lavish executive pay and said it would not affect what executives are paid, only what can be recovered from ratepayers. She cited recent Public Utilities Commission action and ongoing rate cases as evidence the issue is real and recurring. Supportive testimony came from a Minneapolis resident describing financial hardship and rising utility bills, a local worker who said customers have no choice of utility provider and should not fund monopoly executive pay, and advocates from the Energy and Policy Institute and Utility Reform Now, who said ratepayers should not subsidize excessive compensation and that the bill is a targeted reform. Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy opposed the bill’s premise by defending the current regulatory process. Their representatives said the PUC already reviews executive compensation in rate cases, generally allows only limited recovery, and has used that process for decades. Xcel also emphasized its affordability programs and said executives help secure savings and investments for customers. Members discussed whether the legislature should set a bright-line rule or leave the issue to the PUC. Representative Greenman said the bill is needed because the PUC process can take years and the legislature should establish a clear standard for all investor-owned utilities. Some members supported the bill as a response to an affordability crisis and the lack of consumer choice, while others said the legislature should focus on broader energy-cost issues and existing regulatory tools. The committee did not take a final vote on the bill in the portion of the meeting provided, but the amendment was adopted and the bill was moved for re-referral to the general register.

Transcript Highlights:

• So 4-year graduation rates are calculated using SAUs or Shared Accountability units, and I don't know
• And so when you are looking at calculating a 4-year graduation rate for an alternative school.
• And this is because of the way we calculate graduation rate based on SAUs.
• And, and that should send the message that we need to change the way that we calculate those SAUs for
• I am reteaching a lot of the algebra with simple, uh, calculations and, and everything else.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's a per-unit calculation that's lower than a house, but when you multiply it by all the units in multifamily
• question about apartment building, it's a much larger meter to that apartment, and so the cost is calculated
• question about apartment building, it's a much larger meter to that apartment, and so the cost is calculated
• question about an apartment building, it's a much larger meter to that apartment, and so the cost is calculated
• the size of the pipe, and then you can do individual meters on the homes, but that number that's calculated

Bills: HB5489, HB5695, HB5699, SB291, SB292

Keywords: impact fee, moratorium, local government, Texas legislation, infrastructure funding, municipal utility district, eminent domain, bonds, assessments, infrastructure, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Harris County, Municipal Utility District, territory exclusion, debt service taxes, property taxation, condemnation, property acquisition, real property, appraisal reports

Transcript Highlights:

• Using these calculations, Waterville Valley would have to send $54,200 of so-called excess SWEP to the
• And in some places, for instance in Hail's location, my calculations based on DOE data and DRA data is
• 33.440> my in for instance in in Hail's location my in for instance in in Hail's location my calculations
• 34.720> DOE<00:35:35.119> data<00:35:35.280> and<00:35:35.520> DRA calculations
• based on DOE data and DRA calculations based on DOE data and DRA data<00:35:36.720> uh<00:35:

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• three students received both the North Star Promise Plus award and the base award, depending on the calculation
• There are students who are eligible for both, depending on the calculation, and that is the number that
• 00:11:40.720> depending<00:11:41.040> on<00:11:41.160> the<00:11:41.360> calculation
• <00:11:42.360> so uh depending on the calculation so uh depending on the calculation so that's

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The state has already launched a Safe Home, Save Our Homes property tax savings calculator before the
• The state-funded calculator shows a homeowner savings, but not the corresponding loss of local services
• I thought that in the piece of legislation, it referred to covering the cost for a cost calculator.
• I thought that in the piece of legislation, it referred to covering the cost for a cost calculator.
• calculator. But wasn't that already done? So what, do you know what money source paid for that?

Summary: The House took up the special order calendar for a proposed constitutional amendment on property taxes, CS/HJR 1F, which would create a new homestead exemption for non-school taxes, lower the annual assessment cap on non-homestead property, and restrict how counties and municipalities may use ad valorem tax revenue. The sponsor, Rep. Overdorf, said the measure would give homeowners tax relief and argued local governments could adjust spending or use other revenue sources. Opponents repeatedly questioned the ballot language, the lack of a fiscal estimate or backfill, and the potential impact on local services, public safety, and debt obligations. The House adopted the special order report and then debated the resolution and a series of amendments. Several amendments were offered to carve out or protect specific services from the tax changes. Rep. Bartleman’s amendment to protect Children’s Services Councils and Children’s Trusts was supported by members who said those entities fund early learning, mental health, aftercare, and other services for children and working families, but it failed 25-74. Rep. Cross offered an amendment to include water management districts in allowable ad valorem uses, warning of impacts on flood control, water quality, Everglades restoration, and water supply; that amendment also failed. Rep. Eskamani offered an amendment requiring the Legislature to backfill public safety funding if local revenues fall, arguing police and fire services, staffing, and response times would be at risk; it failed 25-71. The chamber then rejected Rep. Woodson’s amendment to require state backfill for senior services, with supporters citing Meals on Wheels, transportation, adult day care, and other local senior programs, and opponents saying the proposal was outside the bill’s scope. Finally, Rep. Gant offered an amendment to protect veteran services, saying local governments fund housing, mental health, transition, and family support programs for veterans; debate emphasized the importance of honoring veterans and avoiding cuts to those services. The transcript cuts off during debate on that amendment, before a final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• And there would be an interest calculation.
• an Another option under statute, like a single lump sum payment, and there would be an interest calculation
• No matter how you do it, you have to figure in an interest rate calculation because otherwise it's not
• and a lump sum payment would too, no matter how you do it, you have to figure in an interest rate calculation
• The system makes the calculation.

Summary: The House opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and approval of the House Journal for the prior day by a vote of 118-1. The rest of the session was dominated by points of personal privilege, including farewell remarks from several outgoing members. Those speeches focused on service, family, staff, veterans, law enforcement, integrity, and concerns about lobbyist influence, with members also thanking legislative assistants and recognizing guests and family members in the chamber. The chamber then took up several bills. Senate Bill 1019, dealing with hospital finance and investment authority, was amended to align workplace violence, telehealth, prior authorization, physician licensure, and Lyme disease language, then passed 110-31. Senate Bill 1572, a pensions bill affecting police retirement, MOSERS, EMPERS, and related board provisions, drew extended debate over how to handle retirement overpayments; amendments were adopted to address technical and policy issues, and the bill passed 129-14. Senate Substitute for Senate Bill 1196, concerning workforce diploma programs, Fast Track Workforce Incentive Grants, workforce Pell Grants, higher education funding, and university board residency rules, was amended and passed 115-20, but its emergency clause failed 2-132. The House also granted further conference on Senate Bill 1020. Committee reports were read on several other measures, including bills recommended to pass by Fiscal Review. Later, the House began considering Senate amendments to House Bill 2508, an LLC-related bill involving certificates of good standing, court dissolution of LLCs in limited circumstances, and a St. Louis County property-management affidavit process for repeated ordinance violations.

Transcript Highlights:

• And second, to answer your question on that second piece of the question, there is a calculation that
• There is a calculation that is done at the local level.
• What this bill does is it takes out the housing component of it and then allows them to calculate the
• So that's how we ensure that we don't mess up calculations from laws that we've seen in the past.
• So that's how we ensure that we don't mess up calculations from laws that we've seen in the past.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Committee held an informational hearing on the final three-party budget agreement and related trailer bills, with the Department of Finance outlining the major budget bill and omnibus measures. Finance described a package built around balancing the state budget amid economic uncertainty, preserving core health and safety-net programs, and making significant ongoing reductions in some state programs. The budget bill included major items such as shifting $1 billion from the General Fund to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for Cal Fire, funding universal transitional kindergarten, deferring some UC and CSU funding, supporting foster care and homelessness programs, providing Proposition 36 implementation funding, and achieving Medi-Cal savings through changes to benefits and eligibility. The committee also heard that votes on the budget bills were expected later in the week and the following Monday. Finance then walked through the trailer bills, including health, human services, early learning, education, resources, energy, transportation, labor, housing, tax, public safety, courts, general government, cannabis, and energy-related measures. Notable provisions included a Medi-Cal enrollment freeze for certain adults, new premiums and benefit changes for some immigrants, child care COLA changes, education funding for literacy, teacher support, universal meals, and community college student support, as well as resource and climate measures affecting Cal Fire staffing and energy permitting. The housing trailer bill drew the most discussion, with provisions on CEQA streamlining, a vehicle miles traveled mitigation banking program, a renters’ credit trigger, and a six-year moratorium on new residential building standards. Members also discussed a film tax credit expansion, cannabis enforcement funding, a tribal police pilot program, and changes to tax policy, including military retirement income exclusions and wildfire settlement payment exclusions. Committee members largely praised the staff and the budget process, but several raised concerns and asked detailed questions, especially about the housing trailer bill’s new wage standards, tribal consultation provisions, and possible effects on prevailing wage protections. Finance explained that the housing language was intended to set wage floors for market-rate projects receiving CEQA streamlining, with different county-based tiers and a notwithstanding clause preserving existing prevailing wage laws. Members also questioned the size and timing of funding for the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative, Clean Cars for All, Proposition 36, and the film tax credit expansion. Other members highlighted support for public safety, veterans’ tax relief, child care providers, housing production, and higher education, while some expressed concern that the budget’s policy changes were being negotiated too quickly or without enough stakeholder input.

Transcript Highlights:

• In fact, we're going back now and calculating a return on investment for each of the activities so we
• In fact, we're going back now and calculating a return on investment for each of the activities so we
• In fact, we're going back now and calculating a return on investment for each of the activities so we
• In fact, we're going back now and calculating a return on investment for each of the activities so we
• In fact, we're going back now and calculating a return on investment for each of the activities so we

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:00:20 CRISP Shared Services 00:01:39 Rural Health Transformation Plan 00:30:55, 958, all

Summary: The Budget Review Subcommittee on Health and Family Services opened its first meeting of the 2026 interim session, took roll, and moved directly into presentations. The main presentation was from Ryan Bramble of Crisp Shared Services, who described the organization’s health information exchange and health data utility model in Kentucky and other states. He emphasized that Crisp is a nonprofit, that data ownership remains with providers, and that governance is local. He also outlined the technical infrastructure, including a master patient index, cloud-based data lake, support for modern standards like FHIR and USCDI as well as older formats, and data quality tools used to normalize and standardize information. Bramble said the model is intended to reduce duplication, lower costs, and support rural providers and future use cases such as reporting, analytics, and AI-enabled decision support. Members asked how the state can ensure the data is actually used and who should drive priorities for health care improvement. Bramble said Crisp can provide tools, expertise, and examples from other states, but local teams such as KHI and state stakeholders must tailor and lead utilization efforts. In response to questions about ownership and coordination, he stressed that successful HIE governance requires a multistakeholder body that includes hospitals, health plans, government, and other interests, with a unified approach rather than multiple competing directives. He also said the Commonwealth has an opportunity to convene those stakeholders and set clear priorities. A senator raised concerns that responsibility for Medicaid and broader health policy has become fragmented and suggested a stronger central role for the state, possibly through the Department of Public Health, to coordinate health priorities. Bramble agreed that a single convening authority and multistakeholder governance are important, and noted that local governance should determine what data is shared and how it is used. No votes or formal actions were taken during this portion of the meeting. After Bramble’s presentation and questions, the committee was told that Secretary Stack from the cabinet would testify next on the rural health transformation plan.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, when you run the calculated outcome for the quadratic equation, your answer's going to be wrong.
• So, when you run the calculated outcome for the quadratic equation, your answer's going to be wrong.
• So, when you run the calculated outcome for the quadratic equation, your answer's going to be wrong.
• So, when you run the calculated outcome for the quadratic equation, your answer's going to be wrong.
• Next up we'll move to Representative Howard. run the calculated uh outcome for the run the calculated

Bills: HF3279, HF1879, HF1417, HF2462

Keywords: housing, sales tax, homeownership, rent assistance, community stability, education, counseling, financial assistance, housing development, culturally appropriate services, HF1417, manufactured home parks, manufactured housing, mobile home parks, housing development fund, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, MHFA, infrastructure grants, infrastructure loans, affordable housing

Transcript Highlights:

• It's very similar to what we're experiencing with the calculations around ERAF.
• It's very similar to what we're experiencing with the calculations around ERAF.
• So I wasn't part of that calculation; it predates me. But there are two important factors.
• We would have to go to the I-Bank and look at that calculation from 2013.
• That is the I-Bank's job in statute, where they're assigned to do that calculation.

Summary: The Assembly Education Committee heard AB 84, a charter school accountability measure focused on non-classroom-based charter schools and fraud prevention. The author and supporters said the bill was intended to respond to the A3 charter fraud case and related scandals by strengthening audits, transparency, authorizer oversight, and funding determination rules, while ensuring public education dollars are used for public education. Supporters included FCMAT, CSEA, CTA, and CSBA, who argued the bill would improve oversight and protect taxpayers. Opponents, including the California Charter Schools Association, Green Dot, many charter parents, educators, and charter operators, said the bill was too broad, would impose major new costs and bureaucracy on all charter schools, and could reduce options for families, especially those using flexible, homeschool, or special-needs charter programs. After extensive testimony and committee discussion, the bill passed on a 5-1 vote and was sent to Appropriations, with the item left open for additional votes. The committee then approved a consent calendar of 11 education bills, including AB 542, AB 563, AB 731, AB 753, AB 784, AB 964, AB 988, AB 1034, AB 1233, AB 1255, and AB 1381, all moving to Appropriations. The consent calendar passed unanimously. Later, the committee heard AB 1454, a literacy and reading instruction bill authored by Assembly Members Rubio and Revis. The bill would require the state to create professional development resources for evidence-based literacy instruction, update English language arts and English language development instructional materials, and revise administrator preparation standards to include literacy training. The authors and a broad coalition of supporters, including CTA, EdVoice, Families in Schools, Decoding Dyslexia, school administrators, and parent advocates, described the measure as a compromise aimed at improving reading outcomes and addressing California’s literacy crisis. There was no opposition testimony at the hearing, and members voiced strong support for the bill and its collaborative approach.

Transcript Highlights:

• protection and uh even<00:19:53.280> a<00:19:53.400> rudimentary<00:19:54.240> calculation
• <00:19:54.799> shows even a rudimentary calculation shows even a rudimentary calculation shows
• We don’t even really count that in our calculations, so if a farmer decides to do a project where they
• so if a a that in our calculations so if a a farmer<00:58:47.920> decides<00:58:48.319> to
• state folks and our local partners use everything from LAR to something we call PTM App to help calculate

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We utilize a cost allocation model to calculate costs of actual services provided to the utility by the
• a mix of industry standards and practices as well as, where available, actual work measured, to calculate
• Cities reported a range of calculation methods, including percentage-based, cost allocation, and fixed
• About half calculate GFTs with a hybrid of those.
• But even regionally, the water supply itself can change how the water bill is calculated.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• savings of $3 million with a calculated savings of $3 million annually.<00:20:22.080> It<00:20
• based on the current calculated based on the current structure<00:21:36.559> of<00:21:36.720>
• So, are they calculating an increase in insurance premium tax from the managed care contracts?
• So, are they they they calculating<00:26:19.120> an<00:26:20.039> increase<00:26:21.039
• > in<00:26:21.360> insurance calculating an increase in insurance calculating an increase

Keywords: 1191, senate, all