Transcript Highlights:

• Sandoval mentioned the pension situation with H.R. 1, because, I'm being honest, the bill isn't beautiful
• With H.R. 1, the tax deduction for seniors is for all seniors.
• The other thing I've heard is a lot of complaining about H.R. 1. That's... The U.S.

Summary: The House convened, approved the journal, recognized the Doctor of the Day, and welcomed several guest groups, including JAG students and students from Heila Ben High School. The chamber then moved into Committee of the Whole to consider HB 2153, the annual tax conformity bill, which was described by supporters as aligning Arizona tax law with recent federal changes and providing relief through no tax on tips and overtime, a larger child tax credit, a new child care expense deduction, and a deduction for certain retirement income. Opponents argued the measure would primarily benefit wealthy individuals and corporations, reduce state revenue, and leave some seniors out because the retirement-income deduction is tied to retirement accounts. Members also discussed the Department of Revenue’s already-issued tax forms and the need for certainty for filers. After extended debate, the Committee of the Whole gave HB 2153 a do pass recommendation by a vote of 31-26, and the House adopted the report and sent the bill to engrossing. The House then took up the Senate mirror bill, SB 1106, substituted for HB 2153, and after floor explanations of vote, passed it 31-27 with 2 not voting. Supporters said the bill would help working families, seniors, and small businesses and prevent filing confusion, while opponents repeated concerns about cost, fairness, and impacts on public services. The bill was transmitted to the Senate. Following the tax vote, members made several announcements, including birthday wishes and a tribute to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and committee chairs announced upcoming cancellations. The House then recessed and reconvened for first reading and referral of a long list of new bills covering topics such as elections, health care, education, transportation, public safety, taxation, housing, and appropriations. The session ended with a motion to adjourn until the next scheduled meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Providing for consideration of the bill H.R. 8464 to amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize
• Discharge Calendar No. 7, House Resolution 1140, resolution providing for consideration of the bill H.R
• I rise to make a motion to discharge H.R. 5408, the Faster Labor Contracts Act.
• Discharge Calendar No. 7, House Resolution 1140, resolution providing for consideration of the bill H.R
• Section 2, clause 1(c) of rule 19 and clause 8 of rule 20 shall not apply to the consideration of H.R

Bills: HB7892 , HR1352 , HB5408 , HR1140 , SB2 , HR1345

Keywords: identity fraud, FAFSA, higher education, financial aid, verification system, labor union, collective bargaining, first contract, initial contract, union certification, union recognition, National Labor Relations Act, NLRA, workplace organizing, labor arbitration, mediation, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, FMCS, binding arbitration, labor relations

Transcript Highlights:

• H.R. 2240, to require the Attorney General to develop reports relating to violent attacks against law
• . 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255.
• So far this Congress, we have passed legislation to secure our elections, H.R. 22, the SAVE Act; hold
• rogue activist judges accountable, H.R. 1526; bring transparency to institutes of higher education,
• Westerman, to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 2215, on which the yeas and nays are ordered.

Bills: HCR24 , HR352 , HB2243 , HR405 , HB2215

Keywords: Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage Week, antisemitism, anti-Jewish hate, Jewish Americans, Jewish community, Hamas, October 7, Israel, hate crimes, civil rights, religious freedom, campus antisemitism, synagogues, public education, heritage month, diversity, inclusion, Holocaust remembrance, community safety

Transcript Highlights:

• I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 875. I too take DUIs extremely seriously.
• Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 275.
• Votes will be taken in the following order: passage of H.R. 875 and passage of H.R. 275.
• Speaker, I hereby remove my name as co-sponsor of H.R. 1329. The clerk will report the change.
• Modification to H.R. 275 offered by Ms.

Bills: HCR39 , HR275 , HR875

Keywords: social work, mental health, community health, social justice, addiction support, veteran assistance, child welfare, disability rights, intellectual disabilities, inclusion, The Arc, community support

Transcript Highlights:

• California and the impact. ...providing health care for Californians here in California and the impact of H.R
• These Section 530A accounts were created under the federal H.R. 1 and enacted in July 2025.
• I mean, there's so many other needs, not even counting the challenges that we're facing from H.R. 1,
• I mean, there's so many other needs, not even counting the challenges that we're facing from H.R. 1,
• I mean, there's so many other needs, not even counting the challenges that we're facing from H.R. 1,

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, the rule provides for H.R. 5184, the Affordable Homes Act.
• H.R. 5184 would be considered under a closed rule.
• Turning next to H.R. 4593, the Shower Act.
• Res. 6938, the combined rule for the consideration of H.R. 4593, H.R. 5184, and 6983. Mr.
• Speaker, I urge the support of H.R. 4593, and so should you.

Bills: HB4593 , HR780 , HR977 , HR979 , HR978

Keywords: showerhead, regulation, energy policy, consumer protection, overregulation, gridlock, policy priorities, House resolution, legislative process, procedural motion, committee, House of Representatives, Mr. Knott, ethics, membership, Doug LaMalfa, memorial resolution, condolence, death of a member, adjournment in honor

Transcript Highlights:

• When the president signed H.R. 1 into law on July 4 of last year, Planned Parenthood health centers were
• We also recognize that H.R. 1 includes many other devastating impacts to health care programs across
• And because of H.R. 1 and the budget challenges that the state is facing, we really need to make sure
• staffing shortages, reduced capacity to meet the dramatic needs, and that's only going to get worse once H.R

Committee: House Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:

• Between the federal tax changes and the national fiscal uncertainty, mainly the impacts of H.R. 1 on
• H.R. 1 has done a number on where our general budget revenues are going to go.
• Between the federal tax changes and the national fiscal uncertainty, mainly the impacts of H.R. 1 on
• H.R. 1 has done a number on where our general budget revenues are going to go.

Summary: The committee heard several public safety measures. HCR 2059, a resolution reaffirming support for county sheriffs and recognizing their constitutional authority, drew debate over language describing sheriffs’ authority as “supreme” or “supreme constitutional.” Supporters said it was a tribute to sheriffs’ work, especially in rural areas, while opponents objected to the phrasing as tied to fringe legal theories. The resolution passed with a do-pass recommendation, 8-3. HB 2811 was presented as closing a gap in Arizona law by making interference with a lawful arrest involving violence or threats of violence a felony under obstructing governmental operations. Supporters said it would clarify the law and align it more closely with federal standards; opponents argued the conduct was already covered by existing resisting-arrest and hindering statutes and that the bill was duplicative and confusing. The bill received a do-pass recommendation, 8-4. HB 4129 would create a Department of Public Safety mental health and wellness program for law enforcement officers and appropriate $15 million for confidential counseling, peer support, family counseling, telehealth, and related services, with some funding reserved for smaller agencies. The sponsor and supporters emphasized officer trauma and suicide prevention, while opponents said similar services already exist and raised cost concerns. Before a final vote, the sponsor requested the bill be held for further work, and the committee agreed. The committee also advanced HB 2270, which expands protections for county seals, logos, insignia, and related identifiers and gives sheriffs exclusive authority over naming and dissolving posses. Sheriffs and county officials said the bill was needed after disputes over posse names and branding; critics warned the language was too broad and could raise First Amendment and due process concerns. The bill passed 12-1. HB 2416, appropriating $20 million for local border support and law enforcement costs related to drug trafficking, smuggling, prosecution, detention, and equipment, also passed after testimony both for and against the funding, 7-5. HB 4018, a strike-everything amendment clarifying sheriffs’ authority over volunteer posses and reserves, passed 10-0 after testimony from sheriffs’ office staff and a member of the public who opposed expanded use of armed volunteers. HB 2253, barring retaliation against employees who testify in law-enforcement disciplinary appeal proceedings, passed unanimously after an amendment removed language voiding restrictive policies. The committee then began hearing HB 4044, which would create a Public Safety Parity Fund using investment earnings from the state rainy day fund to pay DPS and corrections salaries, with the sponsor saying he intended to remove the forfeiture component before floor consideration.

Transcript Highlights:

• H.R. 1 alone is projected to be billions of dollars in added or shifted costs to counties.
• clear and prime opportunity here, in light of all the different cuts that we're seeing as a result of H.R
• When policies like H.R. 1 reduce access to these certifications, When policies like H.R. 1 reduce access

Transcript Highlights:

• We've seen federal funding and policy changes, particularly through the H.R. 1 reconciliation bill that
• briefly about some of the impacts that you will see added cost to the state as a result of particularly H.R
• We added costs to the state as a result of particularly H.R. 1.
• We support and encourage the $155 million spend to address H.R.-1 impacts.

Bills: HB2289

Committee: House Appropriations

Keywords: appropriations, budget, fiscal matters, state spending, general fund, supplemental budget, biennial budget, substitute bill, public defense, civil legal aid, courts, judicial branch, homelessness, supportive housing, affordable housing, behavioral health, juvenile rehabilitation, youth services, child welfare, foster care

Transcript Highlights:

• H.R. number 671 by Howard, recognizing March 14th. 2026 as Texas Women in STEM Day.
• H.R. 459 by Lambert recognizing April 2020. as Parkinson's Awareness Month.
• I move to suspend all necessary rules, take up and consider H.R. 761. the motion.
• H.R. 196 by Dutton proposing constitution may require in the periodic review state and local tax preferences

Bills: HB9 , HB22 , HB908 , HB1392

Keywords: property tax, ad valorem tax, tangible personal property, income-producing property, business personal property, tax exemption, local government finance, appraisal district, chief appraiser, rendition statement, property tax relief, small business, commercial property, leased property, related business entity, unified business enterprise, tax situs, Texas Tax Code, local taxing unit, constitutional amendment

Transcript Highlights:

• budget, specifically focusing on changes made at both the congressional level through the passage of H.R
• year, as you all have heard about over the course of this committee, the federal government passed H.R
• So folks here are aware, I'm sure, that on July 4th President Trump signed H.R. 1 into law.
• A few of the changes that H.R. 1 made established work requirements for adults without dependents, sort
• </c><00:21:08.720><c> So</c><00:21:09.440><c> on</c><00:21:09.679><c> total</c> We estimate that H.R.

Summary: The Senate Rules and Administration Select Subcommittee on Federal Impacts on Minnesotans and Economic Stability met on February 20, 2026, to hear from Minnesota Management and Budget State Budget Director Anna Mingi about federal funding changes affecting the state budget. Before testimony began, Senator Rasmusson objected to a draft committee report that had been prepared in advance of the hearing, arguing it was inappropriate to summarize testimony before it occurred. The chair responded that nonpartisan staff had prepared the draft from Mingi’s submitted presentation and could revise it after the hearing if needed. Director Mingi explained that federal dollars make up more than one-third of state spending and support about 650 federal awards totaling over $23 billion this year, with more than $15 billion supporting state entitlement programs. She said the federal funding environment had changed significantly since January 2025 through executive orders, pauses, terminations, new grant conditions, delayed awards, and the July 2025 passage of H.R. 1, the federal reconciliation bill. Her main focus was H.R. 1’s effects on health care and food assistance, including work requirements for some adults, changes to eligibility for legal non-citizens, limits on retroactive Medicaid coverage and directed payments, new limits on provider taxes, and SNAP changes that shift some benefit and administrative costs to the state and counties. She estimated H.R. 1 would reduce federal funds to state-administered programs by about $327 million in the current biennium and $1.6 billion in the next, with additional costs to hospitals, counties, and other partners beyond the budget horizon. Members asked follow-up questions about whether the estimates were relative to the forecast and whether federal Medicaid funding would still rise over time. Mingi said the estimates were based on the November forecast baseline and that Medicaid federal dollars would likely continue growing overall, though the law still creates significant losses relative to prior projections. Senator Rasmusson emphasized that point in remarks to the committee. The discussion then shifted to federal grant pauses and cancellations: MMB’s tracker showed about six awards on hold totaling roughly $491 million, 13 confirmed cancellations across areas including clean energy, education, food assistance, and public health, and additional threatened or litigated cuts not included in those totals. Mingi identified two canceled violence-prevention-related grants, including a FEMA public safety grant and a justice reinvestment grant, and noted that CDC had recently moved to cancel or seek cancellation of several Minnesota public health grants, including a $65 million public health infrastructure award.

Transcript Highlights:

• And whereas in 1979, Washington State Congressman Mike Lowry introduced H.R. 5977 to provide reparations
• And whereas in 1979, Washington State Congressman Mike Lowry introduced H.R. 5977 to provide reparations

Summary: The Senate first handled routine business, including approving the previous day’s journal, receiving House messages transmitting House Bill 73 and Second Substitute House Bill 1784, and referring Senate Bill 6353 to the Committee on State Government, Tribal Affairs, and Elections. It then moved to resolutions. Senate Resolution 8687, commemorating the 84th anniversary of Executive Order 9066 and acknowledging the incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II, drew extensive remarks in support from several senators. Speakers emphasized the injustice of the internment, the contributions of Japanese American veterans and civil rights activists, the importance of remembrance, and the need to prevent similar abuses in the future. The resolution was adopted by voice vote. The Senate also considered Senate Resolution 8688, recognizing Washington’s dairy farms and the role of dairy producers in the state’s economy and communities. Senators shared personal ties to dairy farming and praised the hard work of family farms, dairy workers, and industry representatives. The resolution was adopted by voice vote, and visiting members of the Washington State Dairy Council, Dairy Women’s Organization, and Dairy Ambassadors were recognized in the gallery. At the close of business, the Senate agreed to adjourn until 12:30 p.m. on Thursday, February 19, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• The federal state match is changing due to H.R. 1, but that's not with this bill.
• About $26 million for the administrative cost, and that's for every state in the country due to H.R.

Committee: House A&B Human Services Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:

• The federal match is changing due to H.R. 1, but that's not with this bill.
• About $26 million for the administrative cost, and that's for every state in the country due to H.R.

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 2949, as amended by a PCS, which would relax child care staffing ratios in an effort to improve the economics of day care centers and expand availability. Representative Tedford said the bill came from an interim study on child care deserts and that he was open to further changes, including tightening the infant ratio back to 4:1 and possibly reducing the toddler ratio. Members raised concerns about safety, learning, and the lack of data on how the changes would affect staffing and children. After discussion, the committee vote ended 2-2, and the bill did not pass. The committee then heard House Bill 3052, the Sir Major White Bullock Child Protection and Family Notification Act, which would require a more structured DHS response when there are repeat fentanyl-related births, including broader family notification and earlier involvement of extended family. Representative Stewart emphasized that the bill was narrowly focused on fentanyl, did not criminalize mothers, and did not mandate automatic removal. Members discussed whether the bill should also address drug dealers or other drugs, but Stewart said separate legislation would address penalties for fentanyl suppliers. The bill passed unanimously, 5-0. Finally, the committee considered House Bill 3638, with a PCS, to create a summer EBT program and revolving fund to help provide food support for children during the summer months when school meals are unavailable. Vice Chair Guys said the program would supplement existing SNAP benefits and summer meal efforts, and would be funded through a mix of public and private sources. Members asked about overlap with food pantries and school meal programs, and about federal matching and administrative costs. The committee approved the bill 5-0. The meeting then adjourned after all House bills were heard.

Transcript Highlights:

• I ask for your support for H.R. 12. Would you like the first roll to be open for co-authors?
• So I stand as a proud co-author with many of you on H.R. 11 and respectfully ask for an aye vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• H.R. 1, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, increased child tax credits to $2,200 per qualifying
• Speaker, rising to ask for a no vote on this amendment, it's great to hear a little bit about H.R. 1,
• H.R. 1 does expand the child tax credit, and again, Mr.
• Speaker, let me remind you that the reforms of H.R. 1, they don't go into effect for another year.
• H.R. 1, they don't go into effect for another year. Mr.

Bills: HB2720 , HB2073 , SB5816 , SB5919 , SB5831 , SB6244 , SB6044 , SB5109 , SB5877 , SB6258

Keywords: behavioral health, emergency services, health insurance, provider access, mental health funding, premium assistance, funding, healthcare, subsidies, juice grapes, agriculture, commerce, state regulation, market access, fire safety, insurance incentives, best practices, community protection, voluntary measures, mortgage modification

Transcript Highlights:

• H.R. 1, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, increased child tax credits to $2,200 per qualifying
• It's great to hear a little bit about H.R. 1, because that's such a big part of why we're here today.
• H.R. 1 does expand the child tax credit, and again, Mr.
• Speaker, let me remind you that the reforms of H.R. 1, they don't go into effect for another year.
• H.R. 1, they don't go into effect for another year. Mr.

Summary: The House debated a series of amendments to a major income tax bill, with repeated arguments over tax fairness, affordability, administrative feasibility, and the role of the Department of Revenue. Early motions to reconsider a failed child care amendment were rejected, and Amendment 2561, which would have restricted data sharing with the IRS, was also defeated after debate over privacy, federal relationships, and whether the proposal was administrable. Amendment 2579, which would have required annual reporting on the tax’s effects on filers, businesses, and charitable donations, likewise failed, with supporters emphasizing transparency and opponents arguing DOR was not the right agency and the report was too speculative. Amendment 2598, proposing to use half of new revenue for a broad sales tax cut, was rejected despite arguments that it would reduce regressivity and provide immediate relief; Amendment 2556, expanding sales tax exemptions for diapers and other child-care essentials to include adult diapers and earlier implementation, also failed after debate over scope and timing.

Transcript Highlights:

• There was a question specifically about the impact of H.R. 1 and how we're thinking about that.
• H.R. 1 and how we're thinking about that.
• So OCA has publicly discussed the impacts of H.R. 1 with the Health Care Affordability Board, which has
• I appreciate the response and then H.R. 1, given that the board mentioned that they're not going to be
• ... ...the response, and then H.R. 1, given that the board mentioned that they're not going to be adjusting

Summary: The hearing began with a stakeholder presentation from Let California Kids Hear urging coverage of pediatric hearing aids for children in the large group market. Advocates described the issue as a long-running developmental emergency, argued that existing state efforts have been inefficient, and said the new proposal would cover about 70% to 80% of affected children without new spending by redirecting existing dollars. Public commenters, including parents, audiologists, and children’s advocates, strongly supported the proposal and emphasized the need for timely access to sound. The chair thanked the group and noted hope for a future fix, including continued work on the exchange market. The Department of Finance then gave a broad budget warning about the state’s more than $20 billion structural deficit and said new investments must be weighed against out-year shortfalls. HCAI followed with an overview of its programs, including CalRx insulin and naloxone, reproductive health grants, the Office of Health Care Affordability, seismic hospital compliance, workforce programs, and the Data Exchange Framework. Members asked about geographic targeting of workforce funds, behavioral health pipeline programs, the status of the 21st Century Nursing Initiative, and future CalRx products such as EpiPens and GLP-1s. HCAI also described its enforcement approach for health care spending targets, saying the board would not change the targets in response to H.R. 1, and outlined the diaper access initiative, which will distribute diapers through hospitals in higher-need areas. Several HCAI budget items were discussed and held open, including additional expenditure authority, the transfer of the Data Exchange Framework and Office of the Patient Advocate, long-term care payment transparency staffing, and reporting on health care worker waiting periods. The department also presented its Behavioral Health Services Act workforce initiative and a proposed $100 million General Fund offset, which both the LAO and the chair questioned as unclear and potentially one-time in nature. HCAI said the final workforce plan would be adjusted after stakeholder consultation if the offset proceeds. The department also described the Rural Health Transformation Program, saying California received $233.6 million in federal funds, had to revise its proposal to satisfy CMS, and must obligate the money by October 30; the program will fund rural care models, workforce development, and technology, with grants rolled out on a phased basis. The Department of Managed Health Care then presented its budget and three legislative implementation requests: SB 41 on PBM reform, SB 306 on prior authorization transparency, and AB 1041 on provider credentialing timelines. Finally, the administration outlined a menopause care proposal requiring coverage and education for menopause-related services, provider training, and an outreach campaign, with DMHC requesting staffing and funding to implement and enforce the new requirements. Throughout the hearing, most items were held open for later action, and no final votes were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• H.R. 1 raises some serious concerns in this context.
• At the same time, though, H.R. 1 gets the federal funding that makes the system possible, leaving youth
• support ends, and that all counties are facing increased demands for resources right now as a result of H.R
• think I'd just like to quickly note, and we've heard a lot about concerns about the federal impacts of H.R
• changes in how the BHSA funds are allocated away from services, and enormous cost pressures because of H.R