Transcript Highlights:

• for instance, reduce the cost of electric vehicles.
• Use electric vehicles, for instance.
• vehicles, which is intended to... that could be a metric.
• vehicles registered in the state.
• So early in this year, we saw a spike in things like vehicle sales.

Committee: House Finance

Keywords: 904, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There is collateral that—ammetry, if we can call it that—from other vehicles in the crossing.
• So it's already illegal to shoot into an occupied vehicle.
• Who is prohibited specifically from shooting into a vehicle? Assuming everybody? Yeah.
• It prohibits governmental entities from adopting 100% EV vehicle and appliance purchasing programs.
• For example, mandating that your fleet be 100 EVs, electric vehicles, regardless of the objective there

Transcript Highlights:

• And so there may be better options to outfit some of the fleet vehicles. I'm not sure.
• , because emergency vehicles are exempted, but that's per state law, what is defined as an emergency
• and also hydrogen-powered vehicles.
• We've got to work, we've got to use... ...vehicles.
• We've got to work, we've got to use. vehicles.

Summary: The committee first established quorum and then approved several governor’s appointments and procedural items, including appointments to the Civil Rights Council, Board of Barbering and Cosmetology, UC College of the Law, San Francisco Board of Directors, bill referrals, and floor acknowledgments. Most of these items passed unanimously, while the Civil Rights Council appointment of Indira Cameron Banks passed 3-2. The bulk of the meeting focused on confirmations to the California Air Resources Board. Supervisor Linda Hopkins and Mayor Patricia Locke Dawson, both nominated to CARB, described their backgrounds and emphasized balancing climate and air-quality goals with economic impacts, community engagement, and practical implementation. Senators raised concerns about cap-and-trade costs, leakage, warehouse and truck traffic impacts, agricultural burdens, emergency vehicle and fleet electrification challenges, natural gas appliance rules, hydrogen, nuclear energy, and the need for socioeconomic analysis. Both nominees said they favored open-door engagement, listening to affected communities, and using data and technology-neutral approaches. Public commenters largely supported both nominees, and the committee voted to advance Hopkins 4-0 and Locke Dawson 5-0 to the full Senate. The committee also heard the appointment of Andrew Rakestraw as chair of the Board of Environmental Safety. Rakestraw, who previously worked in U.S. climate and legal roles, said he would focus on transparency, accountability, fiscal stability, and community responsiveness at DTSC. Senators questioned him about DTSC reform, community engagement in places like the Hinkley/Herupah Valley and Exide cleanup areas, fee-setting and fiscal stability, the hazardous waste management plan, and coordination with the Environmental Justice Advisory Council. He said the board should go beyond brief public comment periods, engage communities directly, and ensure community concerns are reflected in outcomes. Supporters from environmental justice and waste-management groups testified in favor, no opposition was offered, and the committee moved his nomination forward to the Senate floor, with one member abstaining.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 1424 will allow zero-emission vehicle Senate Bill 1424 will allow zero-emission vehicle fueling
• In particular, our zero-emission vehicle incentives have disappeared, our infrastructure incentives to
• the tune of over a billion dollars have disappeared, our vehicle emissions standards have been rolled
• today and those who are going to buy zero-emission vehicles in the future, For those who have vehicles
• today and those who are going to buy zero-emission vehicles in the future, at the very least, let's

Summary: The Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee held a final hearing on a series of Senate bills, with the chair explaining the committee’s suspense-file process and then taking up measures in regular order and later from suspense. SB 1329 on solar property tax assessment drew the most extensive testimony: the author and industry supporters said it would create statewide assessment standards, exclude intangibles, and provide certainty for solar development, while county assessors and county representatives opposed it as a statutory formula that would undercut fair market value and reduce local revenue. The bill was sent to suspense during the first portion of the hearing and later passed suspense 5-2 after amendments. SB 661, dealing with airport funding and aviation fuel tax revenues, also generated support from airport and local government representatives but opposition from airlines over the proposed distribution formula; it was referred to suspense and later passed 7-0 with amendments. SB 1172, which places guardrails on tax-sharing agreements, was supported by local governments and retailers; after the author accepted committee amendments, opposition was withdrawn and the bill passed 4-2 to the floor. SB 9-1-1, a wildfire safety measure using the Preliminary Change of Ownership Report to notify fire agencies about defensible-space compliance, was supported by fire chiefs and wildfire-safety advocates but opposed by assessors; it passed 5-2 to Appropriations. SB 1408, authorizing Contra Costa County to place a transportation sales tax on the ballot, passed 4-2 to the floor. SB 1072, the housing omnibus bill, passed 7-0, and SB 1424, expanding a sales tax exemption for zero-emission vehicle fueling equipment, was held in committee after support from hydrogen and electric transportation advocates and no opposition. In suspense-file action, the committee also passed SB 1435, SB 288, SB 296, SB 420, SB 881, SB 888, SB 1053, SB 1406, and SB 1407, while SB 353 and SB 1249 were held. The chair closed by thanking members, staff, stakeholders, and a retiring consultant, and adjourned the committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><03:11:58.279><c> could</c> section and that if one license could section and that if one license
• licenses people still operated here you licenses people still operated here you didn't<03:26:46.800><
• They're not licensed plumbers, with the notion of having a plumbers board without a single licensed plumber
• And in fact, licensed plumbers who oppose licensing sit on the licensing board for plumbers.
• And in fact, licensed plumbers who oppose licensing sit on the licensing board for plumbers.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The hearing focused on House Bill 610, which would fold the Office of the Consumer Advocate into the Department of Energy rather than fully eliminate consumer advocacy functions. The prime sponsor argued the current office is small, funded by a special assessment on ratepayers, and duplicative of DOE work. He said moving the function to DOE would streamline energy policy review, reduce bureaucracy, and better focus the larger agency on lowering residential energy costs. He also disputed claims that the Consumer Advocate is independent, saying the office is appointed through a political process similar to DOE leadership. Committee members and the sponsor discussed whether the bill would actually relocate existing positions or replace them, and whether the Department of Energy would absorb the cost of the transferred staff. The sponsor said the fiscal note shows roughly a million-dollar reduction in both revenue assessment and spending, and that the bill would effectively reduce the office from five positions to three. He also defended his cost estimates for energy-code-related housing impacts and said the Consumer Advocate has sometimes supported policies he считает increase costs, such as energy-efficiency measures and building code changes. He argued the office should focus more on energy supply and generation, including natural gas and nuclear, rather than efficiency alone. Representative Wendy Thomas testified in opposition, saying the Consumer Advocate is an important, fair, and impartial voice for ratepayers and warning that the bill was fiscally irresponsible because the incumbent could still be owed salary and benefits if the office were repealed. She also said the bill’s drafting was confusing and that the Consumer Advocate’s role is to push back on utilities on behalf of consumers. Other members raised questions about whether the DOE would simply inherit the same political appointment structure and whether the bill would meaningfully lower bills. No vote was taken in the excerpt; the chair indicated additional testimony would follow, and the Department of Energy was present to answer questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• For example, the fee for a tobacco products retailer license or a vapor product retailer license would
• And the license for a cigarette wholesaler or tobacco product distributor license would be increased
• And I do have to say that the license fees are exorbitant.
• for each producer, processor, and retail license.
• And we have a way for the DOL, Department of Licensing, before they issue that fuel distributor license

Bills: HB2675 , HB2681 , HB2714 , HB2688 , HB2481 , HB2116 , HB1408

Committee: House Appropriations

Keywords: accounts, finance, business regulation, transparency, audits, cannabis, license fees, regulatory framework, revenue generation, legalization, HB 2714, caseload forecasting, food assistance, SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, state food assistance, budget forecasting, caseload forecast council, caseload forecast supervisor, Washington State

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> passenger motor vehicle inspections. passenger motor vehicle inspections.
• Considering that you at least have motor vehicle fees as well as motor vehicle inspection fees part of
• fees as well as motor motor vehicle fees as well as motor vehicle<00:50:07.200><c> inspection</c><00
• That's on copies of motor vehicle records, the fee charged to insurance.
• </c> That's on copies of motor vehicle That's on copies of motor vehicle records,<04:35:15.279><c> the

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Committee of Conference on HB 1 and HB 2 met to review revenue estimates and begin working through the HB 1 detail change sheet. New Hampshire Lottery Director Charlie McIntyre reported stronger-than-expected lottery performance, raising the current-year return estimate to $27 million and the next biennium estimate to $200 million, with the increase attributed to improved scratch ticket sales and sports betting not hurting revenue as much as expected. Members questioned the assumptions behind the higher estimates, including the impact of $50 scratch tickets and whether the figures accounted for future conversion from historical horse racing (HHR) machines to video lottery terminals (VLTs). McIntyre and committee members discussed machine counts, per-day revenue assumptions, and the likelihood that VLT conversion would increase revenues over time, though the timing and pace of conversion remained an open question. The committee also discussed several gaming-related policy items in HB 2, including changes to kino hours and local option games of chance, and noted that the Senate and House differed on how gaming revenues would be allocated between charities, education, and general funds. Members emphasized that revenue projections should remain conservative because operators, not the state, would control the pace of machine conversion. Representative Sweeney noted that operators could earn more per machine under the VLT model, and McIntyre said the new facilities and expansions were largely concentrated near the Massachusetts border. The committee then moved to the HB 1 detail change sheet. It agreed to Senate position on the Department of Safety’s road toll bureau and international registration program changes, which were described as a zero-cost realignment of positions, and held the Department of Corrections section for later discussion. On the judicial side, members approved a technical footnote fix, but held a new contract counsel item for involuntary mental health admissions and deferred discussion of the public defender program increase. The committee also noted no change for the PE development authority, moved safety rest area funding from HB 2 into HB 1 with no additional cost, and flagged the tourism development fund and other judicial items as issues that may depend on overall available revenue.

Transcript Highlights:

• Bill 2032A is for a previously owned zero-emission vehicle rebate program, up to $2,000 for a used Tesla
• No, I think this is to encourage a secondary market for electric vehicles, right?
• That secondary market, because these vehicles are so new, hasn’t really developed.
• Would there be any prohibition on a second pot of money when you resell that vehicle?
• They currently have a new vehicle rebate program, so it will just attach onto that. Thanks.

Committee: Senate Energy And Telecommunications

Keywords: 993, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Energy and Telecommunications, chaired by Senator Kevin Parker, considered a lengthy agenda of energy- and utility-related bills. The committee discussed measures on utility outage penalties for combination utilities, a NYSERDA-backed electric landscaping rebate program, stronger utility storm response compliance, a study on utility reporting of late payments to credit agencies, a used zero-emission vehicle rebate program, alternative fuels along the New York State Thruway, a property tax exemption for energy-related utility real property, a NYSERDA pilot microgrid at Glenwood Houses, a prohibition on PSC approval of certain utility rate increases, a sustainable aviation fuel tax credit, a usage monitoring program, and a bill on denial of increased utility rates and charges. Several bills prompted questions about who would pay for the programs or penalties, with sponsors and staff repeatedly stating that fines would be paid by utilities and that many programs would be funded through NYSERDA or existing appropriations, though members raised concerns about whether ratepayer funds or system benefits charges could be used. The electric landscaping rebate bill drew extended debate over whether its equipment definitions could allow companies to use battery equipment charged by generators, while the microgrid pilot and used EV rebate bills were defended as investments to improve reliability, lower peak costs, and build a secondary EV market. Senator May spoke in support of the Glenwood Houses microgrid and the related investment rationale. Most bills were advanced after motions and votes, often with some no votes or without-recommendation votes. The committee reported several measures to third reading, including the utility outage penalties bill, the utility storm response bill, the utility rate increase restriction bill, the usage monitoring program, and the denial of increased utility rates and charges bill. Other bills were advanced to the Finance Committee, Budget and Revenue Committee, or Local Government Committee, including the electric landscaping rebate program, the used EV rebate program, the alternative fuels bill, the tax exemption bill, the Glenwood Houses microgrid pilot, and the sustainable aviation fuel tax credit.

Transcript Highlights:

• , or recreational vehicles.
• The reason why we established safe parking sites was so that for the people who are using the vehicles
• , it's not like suddenly their vehicle is gone in a trash dump or something like that.
• The reason why we established safe parking sites was so that for the people who are using the vehicles
• , it's not like suddenly their vehicle, you know, is gone in a trash dump or something like that. like

Summary: The Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee met with a quorum and announced that SB 340 would be moved to a later hearing. The consent calendar included HR 44, SB 233, and SB 410, which were later approved. The committee then heard several housing-related bills, with testimony largely focused on streamlining accessory dwelling unit (ADU) rules, regional planning, and homelessness response. SB 9 would require local agencies to submit ADU ordinances to HCD within 60 days and respond to HCD findings within 30 days, or the ordinance would become null and void and state standards would apply. Supporters, including California YIMBY, Casita Coalition, UnidosUS, Housing Action Coalition, and Power California, argued the bill would strengthen enforcement of existing ADU law and reduce local barriers. The bill passed 7-0 with two abstentions and was sent to the Assembly Local Government Committee. SB 486 would exempt UC and CSU projects from having to analyze a no-project alternative under CEQA while requiring the universities to share enrollment forecasting data and participate in regional sustainable communities planning. It passed 9-0 and was referred to the Assembly Natural Resources Committee. SB 748, as amended, would expand funding and authority for safe parking sites and related services for people living in RVs or vehicles, using encampment resolution funding and requiring reporting by the California Interagency Council on Homelessness. The City of Compton, the Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association, and the League of California Cities supported the measure, emphasizing public health, neighborhood safety, and humane alternatives to displacement. The committee members discussed the limits of current encampment cleanup approaches and the need for services and temporary shelter; the bill passed 11-0 and was sent to the Assembly Human Services Committee. SB 543, a cleanup bill for ADU and junior ADU law, clarified review timelines, size standards, and consistency with existing ADU statutes; it also passed unanimously and was referred to the Assembly Local Government Committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2217 establishes a grant program to equip law enforcement vehicles with bullet resistance
• , the legislature passed SB 2022, equipping all Texas Department of Public Safety Highway Patrol vehicles
• Today, nearly all DPS vehicles are equipped with this life-saving technology.
• Since 2013, 13 officers were shot through the glass of patrol vehicles.
• legislation aims to enhance officer safety and reduce fatalities caused by gunfire through patrol vehicle

Bills: HB2217

Committee: Senate Criminal Justice

Keywords: law enforcement, bullet-resistant, grant program, safety equipment, peace officers

Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice met and considered two House bills. HB 2217 would create a grant program to help local law enforcement agencies equip patrol vehicles with bullet-resistant components such as windshields, side doors, and windows. Senator Hagenbuch explained that the measure is intended to improve officer safety in light of shootings through patrol car glass, and no invited or public testimony was offered. The committee voted 6-0 to report HB 2217 favorably to the full Senate and also recommended it for the open uncontested calendar. The committee then took up HB 2594, with Senator Creighton explaining that it updates venue rules for cybercrime and related theft cases involving intangible property such as cryptocurrency, online fraud, and intellectual property theft. The bill would allow prosecution in the county where the victim resides, where the defendant is apprehended, or where the defendant is extradited to, giving prosecutors more flexibility when crimes cross county lines. No questions or testimony were offered. The committee voted 6-0 to report HB 2594 favorably to the full Senate. It was also recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. After completing its business, the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• , so we don't have people driving around actual former law enforcement vehicles and pretending to impersonate
• , so we don't have people driving around actual former law enforcement vehicles and pretending to impersonate
• , so we don't have people driving around actual former law enforcement vehicles and pretending to impersonate
• , so we don't have people driving around actual former law enforcement vehicles and pretending to impersonate
• Representative Hewitt has a bill that has a process for law enforcement vehicles to be decommissioned

Committee: House Ways and Means

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• And also, to your point, also mentioned in the analysis with automated vehicles, I think there is going
• to have to be at some point a general revisit on the new technology and vehicles and how we handle issues
• And also, to your point, also mentioned in the analysis with automated vehicles, I think there is going
• to have to be at some point a general revisit on the new technology and vehicles and how we handle issues
• And also, to your point, also mentioned in the analysis with automated vehicles, I think there is going

Summary: The Assembly Judiciary Committee met in a subcommittee setting to hear SB 26, a follow-on bill to last year’s AB 1755 dealing with California’s Song-Beverly “Lemon Law” process. Senator Umberg explained that the measure is intended to preserve the compromise reached last year while allowing automakers to opt out of the new framework and return to the prior law, with the goal of speeding up discovery and helping consumers resolve claims more quickly. Committee members and the author also noted the bill’s connection to concerns about court congestion and the need to revisit the law as vehicle technology evolves. Support came from Consumer Attorneys of California, Toyota, and several automakers and manufacturers, including General Motors, Rivian, Honda, Hyundai, Lucid, Tesla, Kia, Volkswagen Group, and Mercedes. Toyota said the bill gives automakers a five-year opt-in choice and reflects the negotiated deal. In soft opposition, Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety said it preferred more manufacturers opt out, but remained concerned about AB 1755’s reduced statute of limitations and repose, negative equity deductions, and the broader impact on consumers with defective vehicles. After quorum was established, the committee took up the motion and passed SB 26 on a roll call vote, with all members present voting aye. The chair thanked the stakeholders for reaching a compromise and indicated the bill would move forward, with immediate referral anticipated after floor action.

Transcript Highlights:

• I won't go anywhere near writing such exemptions, even when they're appropriate, because I'll licensed
• Some of them have voluntarily surrendered their license.
• Two have surrendered their license. Nine went on probation.
• So only two no longer are licensed to practice here in the state of California since 2021.
• can face fines and a forfeiture of a license.

Committee: Senate Health

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• by DHHS in the state of New licensed by DHHS in the state of New Hampshire<00:14:08.000><c> some</c>
• </c> can result in the loss of their license. can result in the loss of their license.
• ,</c><01:18:06.320><c> that</c> saying you could lose your license, that saying you could lose your license
• </c><03:22:45.920><c> So</c> uh get a driver's license at 16. So uh get a driver's license at 16.
• </c> years in school, passing licensing years in school, passing licensing exams,<03:33:38.000><c> and

Committee: House Judiciary

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> Minnesota schools have a licensed Minnesota schools have a licensed library<00:02:16.520><c> media
• </c> licensing problems are the most severe. licensing problems are the most severe.
• current publisher licensing Under current publisher licensing models,<00:04:21.760><c> libraries</c>
• </c><00:58:32.240><c> As</c> Licensing and Standards Board. As Licensing and Standards Board.
• </c> one-time fee for a one-year license. one-time fee for a one-year license.

Committee: Senate State and Local Government

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• are not located on a school campus: any program located on a school campus and funded by an LEA is license-exempt
• But we do know, you know, so I think the system-wide framework here will be the vehicle that will help
• The proof-of-concept fund is intended to catapult promising early-stage research into license-ready technologies
• that can either be licensed to existing companies or support the formation of spin-out companies that
• likely that they’re going to stay and do the rest of their residency and then also stay and become a licensed

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Any program located on a school campus and funded by an LEA is license exempt.
• But we do know, you know— So I think the system-wide framework here will be the vehicle that will help
• The proof-of-concept fund is intended to catapult promising early-stage research into license-ready technologies
• that can either be licensed to existing companies or support the formation of spin-out companies that
• likely that they’re going to stay and do the rest of their residency and then also stay and become a licensed

Summary: The committee heard testimony on three education budget items: the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP), differentiated assistance/statewide system of support, and universal school meals plus kitchen infrastructure grants. For ELOP, the Department of Finance described the Governor’s proposal to provide $4.7 billion ongoing Proposition 98 funding and $62.4 million to set a minimum Tier 2 rate of $1,800 per pupil. The LAO recommended instead fixing the Tier 2 rate at $1,579, and committee members questioned how the rate was determined, how much funding is actually spent, and whether overlapping funding from ELOP, ACEs, and 21st Century programs is being tracked. CDE said ELOP is showing positive attendance and math outcomes, but some requested data will not be available until mid-2027; members also raised concerns about double-funding, transparency, and whether middle and high school students are being equitably served. On differentiated assistance, CCEE outlined the statewide system of support and the various tiers of universal, targeted, supplemental, and intensive assistance. Finance explained the Governor’s proposal to replace the current DA structure with a more stable universal and targeted assistance model, funded at $131.9 million ongoing, with a three-year support cycle aligned to LCAP and ESSA timelines and broader State Board authority to revise eligibility criteria. The LAO objected to considering the proposal before the State Board finalizes the new performance criteria, and committee members expressed concern that moving to a three-year cycle could delay support for LEAs that newly fall into need mid-cycle. There was also discussion about whether the proposal would weaken subgroup-based equity guardrails or give the State Board too much discretion over who qualifies for support. For school meals and kitchen infrastructure, Finance proposed $1.8 billion ongoing for universal meals and an additional $100 million ongoing plus $100 million one-time for a fourth round of kitchen infrastructure and training grants. The LAO recommended rejecting the new kitchen grant round because prior rounds are still being spent and the unmet need is not yet clear. CDE said prior investments have improved meal participation, efficiency, and menu variety, but many schools still lack the facilities for scratch cooking and face construction, electrical, and procurement barriers. Members asked for more data on how prior grants were used, which schools are benefiting, and whether funds could also support lower-cost food access strategies such as pantries, while noting federal restrictions on some meal-service innovations.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate<00:27:40.159><c> bill</c><00:27:40.640><c> 3082,</c> Senate Bill 3082, Motor Vehicle Commission
• The changes in that would be $40,000 to update their current licensing system, $9,000 for operational
• or drug abuse problems so that they could get treatment before they had any repercussions to their license
• 00:41:17.599><c> to</c><00:41:17.839><c> any</c><00:41:18.560><c> um</c><00:41:18.720><c> law</c> license
• or were referred to any um law license or were referred to any um law enforcement.<00:41:19.520><c>

Committee: Joint Appropriations

Keywords: Appropriations - Room 216, 18 February, 2026; 11:00 AM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, today we are acting on three vehicle-only bills since we have not reached a joint agreement
• As we know from the MMB debt guidelines overview, there was an assumption of this vehicle.
• Representative Mary Franzen is here to discuss House File 719, Vehicle Bill.
• Members, this is another vehicle bill so we can hopefully get a bonding bill done. Thank you.
• This would just be another vehicle bill.

Bills: HF719 , HF2484 , HF2486

Committee: House Capital Investment

Keywords: safety, school transportation, infrastructure, capital investment, state bonds, library construction, education funding, early childhood, child protection, funding, bonds, education facilities

Transcript Highlights:

• I have Reed Addis from the Electric Vehicle Charging Association as my key witness.
• Reed Addis, on behalf of the Electric Vehicle Charging Association, in strong support here today.
• And by what was 2035, no gasoline vehicles will be allowed to be sold.
• one option: electric vehicles operated by electricity and infrastructure for charging stations.
• Read out on behalf of the Electric Vehicle Charging Association.

Committee: Senate Local Government

Summary: The committee heard a series of housing, local government, and governance bills, with most of the discussion focused on housing production, permitting, and local accountability. SB 1003, by Senator Grayson, would create an Infrastructure Partnership Financing Program to help local jurisdictions and developers jointly fund infill housing infrastructure; it drew support from housing advocates and senior housing groups, while Senator Seyarto questioned whether the state would actually fund another program. The bill was moved on a 3-1 vote and remained on call. SB 1014 would require local jurisdictions to provide good-faith estimates of on-site and off-site improvements within 30 business days of a preliminary application and limit later surprise requirements; Habitat for Humanity, SPUR, and other housing groups supported it, while the City of San Mateo and local government associations raised concerns about accuracy and timing. It passed 4-2 and remained on call. SB 1036, which would require credit under the Mitigation Fee Act for prior site uses when redeveloping a site, passed unanimously to the Senate floor. SB 1145 would streamline CEQA and federal reuse review for qualifying projects at the former Concord Naval Weapons Station; it drew broad labor and local support, but housing and legal advocates sought stronger affordability and enforceability provisions. The bill passed 6-0 to the Committee on Environmental Quality. The committee also considered SB 908, which would streamline permits for energy-code-compliant residential window replacements and limit local design restrictions and HOA barriers. Supporters said the bill would let homeowners and affordable housing providers reduce energy costs, while opponents argued it could override local design standards; it passed 3-1 and remained on call. SB 1172, the Local Tax Savings Act, would add guardrails and transparency to local tax-sharing and consultant agreements; it was supported by the City of Shafter and the League of California Cities and passed 4-0 to Revenue and Taxation, remaining on call. SB 1283 would expand ministerial approval for EV charging stations to include canopies and on-site energy storage systems and require local ordinance updates by 2027; EV industry groups supported it, while cities and counties warned about safety, liability, and local review. Members discussed battery storage safety and litigation concerns, and the bill passed 4-0 to Judiciary, remaining on call. The committee also heard SB 1379, which would separate the Riverside County Sheriff-Coroner offices and create an independent medical examiner in response to in-custody death concerns. Supporters cited high death rates, settlements, and the need for independent investigations, while the sheriff’s association and county representatives argued the change would be costly, duplicate services, and override local control. The bill passed 4-1 to Public Safety and remained on call. Finally, SB 1414 would create an independent redistricting commission for San Bernardino County; supporters said it would improve transparency and remove conflicts of interest, while the county opposed the estimated $2 million cost and noted its existing advisory commission. Members generally supported independent redistricting, and the bill was discussed but no final vote was recorded in the excerpt.