Transcript Highlights:

• Current vote is four ayes and no nays, with the chair and vice chair voting, Senators Cortese, Gonzalez
• Current vote is four ayes and no nays, with the chair and vice chair voting aye.
• Current vote is four ayes and no nays, with the chair and vice chair voting aye.
• There is not a public vote at all. There isn't a vote from which they could recuse themselves.
• I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you. Like to close. I respectfully ask for an aye vote.

Committee: Senate Education

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Respectfully, I ask for your aye vote.
• And I respectfully ask for an aye vote.
• Five votes will keep the roll open for absent members.
• Five votes will keep the roll open for absent members.
• I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you.

Committee: House Labor and Employment

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The right to vote is also the right not to vote. But there are countries that do.
• </c> pro-voting culture. pro-voting culture.
• We call it Students Vote.
• for the Voting Rights Act.
• </c> they all voted for the Voting Rights they all voted for the Voting Rights Act.

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The committee held a joint hearing recognizing the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and focusing on civic education, free speech, voting, and Minnesota’s America 250 commemorations. Opening remarks emphasized the importance of education, Indigenous land acknowledgement, and the idea that democracy depends on informed and engaged citizens. The chair then invited student debaters from the Minnesota High School League to testify about how debate, free speech, and evidence-based reasoning have shaped their education and civic participation. The students argued that debate teaches critical thinking, helps young people engage with difficult issues, and should be protected as part of a healthy democracy; one also urged lawmakers to move beyond empty promises and take action on issues such as eviction moratoriums, ICE collaboration, and protest protections. Commissioner Willie Jett of the Minnesota Department of Education testified that public education is where citizenship first becomes real, and that schools, libraries, and educators help students learn to listen, question, debate respectfully, and understand both the ideals and failures of American history. He said democracy is something each generation must learn and strengthen, and thanked the committee for convening the hearing. Former students Sarah Griffin and Charlie Crocker then offered tributes to Senator Swedzinski, describing how his teaching encouraged civic engagement, disagreement, and action, and how his classroom shaped their lives and public service. Their remarks emphasized that democracy is not a spectator sport and that ordinary people build it through small, courageous acts. Secretary of State Steve Simon followed with testimony on Minnesota’s civic culture and voter participation. He said Minnesota has long ranked near the top nationally in voter turnout, including youth turnout, and attributed that to a combination of good election laws and a strong pro-voting culture. He highlighted school-based civic education efforts such as pre-registration for 16- and 17-year-olds and the Students Vote mock election program, and noted that Minnesota’s congressional delegation was unanimous in supporting the Voting Rights Act in 1965 as an example of the state coming together on major moral questions. The Minnesota Historical Society then began its presentation on America 250, with Kent Whitworth describing the organization’s role, the new edition of the Northern Lights curriculum, and broader commemorative activities; Dr. Bill Convery introduced historical context about how Americans have celebrated independence and how the semiquincentennial can leave a legacy for future generations.

Transcript Highlights:

• The chair then asked for public comments on the vote. Hearing none, the committee voted.
• The chair called for a vote. The motion failed.
• So with that, I would have to recommend a no vote and encourage the committee to do a no vote on this
• and encourage the committee to do a vote and encourage the committee to do a no<00:43:04.640><c> vote
• She urged a yes vote on the bill.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee heard House File 1987, the Minnesota Starter Home Act, and first adopted the A1 author’s amendment, which made minor cleanup changes, removed sections two and three, adjusted ADU language, and tweaked density language. The bill authors described the measure as a bipartisan effort to address Minnesota’s housing shortage by allowing more starter homes, duplexes, townhomes, and accessory dwelling units, while also limiting some local zoning barriers and preserving city protections in certain sensitive areas. They emphasized that the state has a large housing gap, rising home prices, and that the bill is intended as one part of a broader housing package. Supportive testimony came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, Housing First Minnesota, Habitat for Humanity, AARP Minnesota, and Americans for Prosperity. These witnesses argued that workforce and starter-home shortages are hurting families, employers, and economic growth; that restrictive zoning and lengthy approval processes raise costs; and that more middle housing and ADUs would expand options for older adults, caregivers, working families, and people seeking homeownership. Several supporters said the bill would reduce regulatory barriers, lower development costs, and help communities add needed housing supply. Opposition or cautionary testimony came from city and municipal representatives, including officials from Cambridge, Eagan, and Mankato, as well as the League of Minnesota Cities and related groups. They argued that local governments already are approving substantial housing growth and need flexibility to manage zoning, parking, infrastructure, stormwater, and community input. They warned the bill could weaken local control, remove practical standards, and create unintended impacts such as more rental conversion in some neighborhoods or development without adequate infrastructure. No final vote on the bill itself was shown in the transcript beyond adoption of the A1 amendment.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> to vote yes on this file. to vote yes on this file.
• He urged members to vote yes, saying a yes vote supports kids, families, and educators, while a no vote
• A vote what what a vote on this bill is.
• Voting<01:10:21.360><c> no.</c> Voting no. Voting no.
• </c> to all vote in affirmative. to all vote in affirmative.

Bills: HF3435 , HF3409

Committee: House Education Policy

Keywords: school access, school site, school district, charter school, federal agents, DHS, Department of Homeland Security, ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CBP, Customs and Border Protection, USCIS, immigration enforcement, judicial warrant, student privacy, school safety, sanctuary schools, warrant requirement, federal warrant, school grounds

Transcript Highlights:

• The members will vote. Vote yes to table. Vote no. The motion's been tabled. Thank you, sir.
• &gt;&gt; Vote yes to table. Vote no. &gt;&gt; Vote yes to table. Vote no.
• "Vote I to not table the amendment. Vote nay." Clerk will unlock the machine. "Members will vote."
• "Please vote yes." amendment vote I to not table the amendment vote I to not table the amendment<02:04
• The members shall vote. The members shall vote. Record the votes: 99 yeas, zero nays.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Senator.
• Thank you, and we respectfully ask for an aye vote on SCR 127.
• He said, 'Some things are more important than votes.'
• With that, I ask for an aye vote. Thank you.
• I urge an aye vote. Thank you, Senator. Thank you, Senator.

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, offered prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, and then recognized several guest groups, including representatives of the National Council of Negro Women, students from Santa Clarita Christian School, and the Coachella Valley High School girls soccer team. The chamber also marked Senator Allen’s birthday and later took up a memorial adjournment in memory of Dr. William Ma, offered by Senator Wiener. On the floor, the Senate confirmed three gubernatorial appointments: Andy Nakahata as executive director of the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, Richard Stein to the California Arts Council, and Nick Hardiman to the California Housing Finance Agency Board of Directors. Each confirmation passed unanimously or near-unanimously after brief supportive remarks about the appointees’ experience and qualifications. The Senate also adopted several resolutions. SCR 127 designated December as Multi-Faith Heritage Month, SCR 110 recognized Women’s Military History Week, SCR 137 proclaimed March 15 as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Day, and SR 85 marked Multiple Sclerosis Awareness Week. Members spoke in support of each measure, emphasizing interfaith understanding, women’s military service, Ginsburg’s legacy on equality, and the need for MS awareness and research. All of the resolutions passed by unanimous roll call, and the special consent calendar items were also approved 33-0. The session concluded with committee announcements for upcoming budget subcommittee meetings and a select committee meeting on California’s wine industry, followed by recess and notice of the next Senate session.

Transcript Highlights:

• I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Senator.
• Thank you, and we respectfully ask for an aye vote on SCR 127.
• With that, I ask for an I vote. Thank you.
• I urge an aye vote. Thank you, Senator.
• With that, I urge an aye vote. Thank you. Thank you, Senator.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It is two separate votes, so there will be a motion on that. All right, it is two separate votes.
• So how can we vote on this? There was a motion to deny, so we are going to take a vote.
• So if you want the motion to pass to deny it, you vote yes. A vote no is to approve. Okay. Okay.
• A vote no is to approve. Okay? All right. Thank you. Senator Price? No, y'all are voting already.
• The House side is voting. We do not have a vote on this side because there was no objection.

Summary: The joint Senate and House Transportation, Highways, and Public Works committees met on March 3, 2026, and first considered several requests for approval to use the construction manager at risk (CMAR) method for local projects. The first item, Caddo Parish’s proposed $9.6 million pickleball park, drew extended questioning about whether the project was truly complex, whether CMAR would save money versus public bid, the project’s location and accessibility, and whether it fit the statute’s timing and risk criteria. The House initially voted to deny the request, while the Senate had moved to approve; after discussion about the statute and CMAR policy, the House motion was reconsidered and the Caddo project was ultimately approved. The committee then approved CMAR requests for an Ascension Parish Sheriff’s Office indoor shooting range, a Calcasieu drainage district pump station rehabilitation/replacement project, St. Tammany Parish Hospital District No. 2’s Slidell Memorial emergency department expansion, St. Charles Parish Hospital’s entry registration/PACU renovation, and the Port of Vinton dock project in Calcasieu Parish. Testimony on the approved projects emphasized complexity, operational continuity, and schedule concerns. The Ascension Parish shooting range was described as involving bullet protection, ventilation and lead-control systems, and multiple training configurations; the drainage district project was presented as critical infrastructure serving much of Lake Charles and requiring staged construction to maintain flood protection; the hospital projects were justified by work inside operating facilities and the need to avoid disrupting patient care; and the Port of Vinton project was tied to an LED-related deadline and the need to keep port operations running during construction. Members generally supported these projects, with motions to approve made on both sides and no objections recorded. The meeting also featured a broader policy discussion about CMAR use. Several members, especially Representative Fontenot, questioned whether the committee had been too permissive in approving CMARs for projects that did not appear especially complex, and raised concerns about public bidding, taxpayer savings, and impacts on minority contractors. Senator Price said future legislation may tighten CMAR requirements, while Senator McMath and Senator Carter noted that the statute’s listed factors are not exhaustive and cautioned against abruptly changing practice for pending projects. The committee recessed after completing the CMAR agenda and planned to hear a DOTD presentation afterward.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, may I explain my vote? Yes, Representative.
• I vote aye. Vice Chair Peña? Chair Rivero? Aye.
• I’ll explain my vote, members. I... Did you vote for me? I did. Okay. Did you vote? I did.
• Chair Weninger, would you like to vote again? No, I’m not. I just didn’t remember my vote.
• And with that, I vote aye.

Bills: HB2746 , HB2751 , HB2752 , HB2753

Committee: House International Trade

Keywords: trade offices, committee, Arizona commerce authority, stakeholder input, efficiency, Arizona competes fund, economic development, fund repeal, state finances, state appropriations, Arizona Commerce Authority, job creation, business incentives, commerce authority, public-private partnership, business regulation, Arizona governance, 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill passes, members, by our vote. Was reported favorably. Congratulations.
• So I will be voting down on this bill. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
• We should be incredibly honored. to be able to vote up on this bill.
• The bill harms voting Floridians like me.
• All our representatives vote for us to represent them.

Committee: House Commerce Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• so the recording system will pick up your votes and motions.
• Uh, when explaining your vote, first cast your vote, then explain.
• Uh, when explaining your vote, first cast your vote, then explain.
• Uh, when explaining your vote, first cast your vote, then explain.
• "Explain my vote, Mr. Chair." "Yes, please. I vote aye.

Committee: Senate State & Local Government

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:07 Attendance Roll Call: 00:14 SB 68 Discussion 01:21 SB 68 Vote 04:40 SB 20 Discussion 05:34 SB 20 Vote 08:12 Adjournment: 09:15, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This reflects all of your votes.
• The vote is 14 to 1.
• The vote is 14 to 1. Amendment 1474H to House Bill 1A is adopted. The vote is 14 to 1.
• You voted on both the amendments.
• The vote is 14 to 1.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Finance Committee met for final approval of HB 1 and HB 2, with legislative budget staff Michael Kain reviewing the final amendment documents and surplus statements. Kain explained that HB 1474H and HB 1484H incorporated the committee’s prior votes and the Governor’s recommended sections, and he walked through the budget math for the general fund, education trust fund, Highway Fund, and Fish and Game Fund. He said the committee’s proposal remained balanced overall, though the current-year general fund showed a projected deficit that HB 2 would address by allowing a possible rainy day fund transfer if needed. He also noted that the committee’s revenue estimates were below the Governor’s, requiring reductions and adjustments to appropriations and lapse assumptions. Members discussed the rainy day fund provisions, including a section in HB 2 that suspends existing restrictions so a transfer can be made if the deficit materializes. Kain said the committee’s approach differed from the Governor’s because the state was not below the overall revenue plan, and the fiscal committee would retain a role in determining any transfer. He also summarized that the Highway Fund would end with about a $13 million balance and Fish and Game with about $3 million, both without additional general fund support. The committee then adopted two amendments to HB 2 unanimously: Amendment 1473H, a technical cleanup to the Group 2 retirement seven-year rule, and Amendment 1482H, a technical correction to the recreational services language. Amendment 1484H, which incorporated those changes into HB 2, was adopted on a 14-1 vote after minority members objected to the bill’s broader cuts and policy changes, including reductions to state agencies, health and human services, and education-related provisions. The committee also adopted Amendment 1474H to HB 1A on a 14-1 vote after similar debate over budget reductions, vacancies, university funding, and school spending limits. Finally, the committee voted 14-1 to report HB 1A and HB 2 as amended as ought to pass, with the minority voting no and the committee planning a full House presentation the following week.

Transcript Highlights:

• I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you.
• I respectfully ask for your aye vote.
• Respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you.
• I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you.
• We respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you.

Committee: Senate Health

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They will be voted on as a group.
• We urge an aye vote.
• Mary Succi not voting. Mr. Hoover, aye. Addis? Not voting. Mayor Succi, not voting. Hoover, aye.
• Adis not voting. Alvarez aye. Bonta not voting. Castillo aye. Garcia aye. Garcia no.
• Lowenthal not voting. Patel, not voting. I have an obligation. Okay.

Summary: The Assembly Education Committee heard AB 84, a charter school accountability measure focused on non-classroom-based charter schools and fraud prevention. The author and supporters said the bill was intended to respond to the A3 charter fraud case and related scandals by strengthening audits, transparency, authorizer oversight, and funding determination rules, while ensuring public education dollars are used for public education. Supporters included FCMAT, CSEA, CTA, and CSBA, who argued the bill would improve oversight and protect taxpayers. Opponents, including the California Charter Schools Association, Green Dot, many charter parents, educators, and charter operators, said the bill was too broad, would impose major new costs and bureaucracy on all charter schools, and could reduce options for families, especially those using flexible, homeschool, or special-needs charter programs. After extensive testimony and committee discussion, the bill passed on a 5-1 vote and was sent to Appropriations, with the item left open for additional votes. The committee then approved a consent calendar of 11 education bills, including AB 542, AB 563, AB 731, AB 753, AB 784, AB 964, AB 988, AB 1034, AB 1233, AB 1255, and AB 1381, all moving to Appropriations. The consent calendar passed unanimously. Later, the committee heard AB 1454, a literacy and reading instruction bill authored by Assembly Members Rubio and Revis. The bill would require the state to create professional development resources for evidence-based literacy instruction, update English language arts and English language development instructional materials, and revise administrator preparation standards to include literacy training. The authors and a broad coalition of supporters, including CTA, EdVoice, Families in Schools, Decoding Dyslexia, school administrators, and parent advocates, described the measure as a compromise aimed at improving reading outcomes and addressing California’s literacy crisis. There was no opposition testimony at the hearing, and members voiced strong support for the bill and its collaborative approach.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:01:47.200><c> on</c> vote thank you chair uh voting on vote thank you chair uh voting on sb125
• </c><01:02:07.119><c> unless</c> this vote and any further votes unless this vote and any further votes
• Seeing none, Vice Chair, for the vote. Voting on SB 1099 HD1.
• Seeing none, Vice Chair, for the vote. Voting on SB 1582.
• Representative Loen votes aye. Representative Peruso votes aye. Representative Quinlan votes aye.

Committee: House Agriculture & Food Systems

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Seeing none, chair for the vote. Thank you, members. Voting on STR 32.
• Seeing none, chair for the vote. Members voting on STR 117 SD1 HD1.
• Seeing none, chair recommendation is adopted. vote. Members voting on STR17 SD1 HD1. vote.
• Members voting on STR17 SD1 HD1.
• <00:19:33.520><c> no</c><00:19:33.840><c> with</c> vote no with vote no with reservations?

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Transportation met on Thursday, April 17 at 10:00 a.m. with a short agenda focused on two resolutions. STR 32 requested that the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation work with the Department of Transportation to use inmate work furlough programs for state roadway and highway maintenance. Testimony was received in support from the Department of Transportation, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and an individual, Frank Schultz. No one testified in opposition or with reservations. The committee also heard STR 117 SD1 HD1, which urged the Safe Routes to School Advisory Committee to collaborate with the Department of Education, Department of Transportation, and the County of Hawaii to inventory bus stops on Hawaii Island used by children traveling to school and to develop safety improvements at those locations. Testimony in support came from the Department of Transportation, the Department of Education, and Frank Schultz. Again, there was no opposition or additional public testimony. After taking the measures up, the committee voted to pass both resolutions unamended as is. The chair’s recommendations were adopted, with some members excused from the vote on STR 32. Before adjournment, the chair noted this was the last traditional transportation committee hearing of the session, thanked staff, members, and advocates, and said the committee would move into conference on nearly 45 transportation measures. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Being 11, I vote no, nay votes. The measure passes with favorable expression.
• </c><00:04:40.759><c> no</c><00:04:41.000><c> n</c><00:04:41.199><c> votes</c><00:04:41.520><c> the</
• c><00:04:41.600><c> measure</c> I mean 10 I votes no n votes the measure I mean 10 I votes no n votes
• </c><00:04:55.080><c> no</c><00:04:55.199><c> nay</c><00:04:55.400><c> votes</c> understand being 11
• I votes no nay votes understand being 11 I votes no nay votes measure<00:04:55.960><c> passes</c><00:

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:00 HB 695 Discussion 00:00:25 HB 695 Vote 00:03:50, 958, all

Summary: The Appropriations and Revenue Committee met to consider House Bill 695 and first adopted a committee substitute. The substitute made a number of Medicaid-related changes, including adding the Medicaid Oversight Advisory Board, exempting federally required Medicaid changes from needing separate General Assembly authorization, revising the treatment of University Hospitals payment programs, clarifying that the community engagement program is mandatory, moving the Medicaid pharmaceutical rebate fund to the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, and narrowing reporting requirements. It also removed provisions on Medicaid coverage for psychoeducational services and replaced them with reporting on behavioral health and substance use disorder service utilization and expenditures. The substitute further added language allowing the Medicaid program to be administered through fee-for-service, managed care, or other federally permitted delivery systems, incorporated the Medicaid Oversight and Advisory Bill, authorized a state plan amendment if needed, and made entities that failed to comply with prior Medicaid managed care reporting requirements ineligible for new MCO contracts. It also shifted responsibility for a behavioral health and substance use disorder treatment scorecard from MCOs to the Department for Medicaid Services. The sponsor noted that all language related to long-term managed care in the waiver program had been removed. After the explanation, Senator Richardson moved to adopt the substitute and Senator Nunn seconded. The committee then voted to pass the measure favorably; the transcript reflects a roll call with no nays and the bill reported out with favorable expression.

Transcript Highlights:

• Voting on SB 2060 SD 2, the vote.
• Any no votes? Cochran. Any no votes?
• votes?
• Voting Rep. Morikawa's amendments. Voting Rep.
• </c> Voting on SB 2552 SD1. Voting on SB 2552 SD1.

Bills: SB2069 , SB2177 , SB2342 , SB2060 , SB2544 , SB3011 , SB2061 , SB2552

Committee: House Housing

Keywords: SB2069, Hawaii housing, HHFDC, Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation, Dwelling Unit Revolving Fund, equity pilot program, housing affordability, homeownership, first-time homebuyer, for-sale housing, transit-oriented development, TOD, transit-oriented development zone, bus route, bus stop, critical workforce housing, health care workers, educators, law enforcement, correctional officers

Summary: The House Housing Committee opened its Friday morning hearing by noting potentially catastrophic flooding on the island and acknowledging that some members were absent helping their communities, so quorum for voting was uncertain. The committee then heard testimony on several housing-related measures, with most bills drawing support from housing agencies and community organizations and little or no opposition in the room. On SB 2069 SD2, SB 2177 SD2, and SB 2342 SD2, witnesses largely supported the measures. HHFDC supported SB 2069 and SB 2177, and HPHA supported SB 2342. For SB 2342, HHFDC raised concerns that the bill would alter the Qualified Allocation Plan outside the normal open, public process required by federal law and could exclude stakeholders; Kathy Charities echoed those concerns and also objected to changing point allocations in ways that could raise rents and weaken long-term affordability. Members questioned HHFDC about how the QAP is normally updated, the meaning of the point system, and whether a legislative working group could mandate changes; HHFDC said recommendations would still need public hearing and board approval. The committee also heard SB 2060 SD2, which would create a mixed-income subaccount in the rental housing revolving fund. HHFDC said the subaccount would likely use tier-two funds, estimated at about $100 million total, to support mixed-income projects above 60% AMI, citing Front Street Apartments as a possible example. Members asked about project selection and funding needs. On SB 2544 SD2, OHA opposed the bill’s Chapter 6E-related exemptions and mandatory review timelines, arguing that burial review protections should not be weakened and that the SPEED Task Force process was a better venue for streamlining. The sponsor later clarified that the bill was not meant to eliminate the 60-day review process but to make the deadline clearer. For SB 3011 SD1, which concerns public housing and pet ownership, HPHA and several humane organizations supported the measure, saying it would help low-income residents and seniors keep pets and benefit from animal companionship. HPHA explained its existing pet policy, including deposits, monthly fees, and restrictions, and said the requested funding would support ADA-accessible pet areas and related administration. Finally, on SB 2061 SD2, HCDA supported the bill while OHA opposed it unless protections for Hawaiian Crown and Government lands were strengthened. Committee members questioned the project’s 60/40 split between income-restricted and market-rate units, the 10-year owner-occupancy restriction, and the procurement exemption; the sponsor said the exemption was tied to a real estate transaction and that the project would still use 103D-like solicitation procedures. No votes were taken during the hearing, and several items were left for later action because quorum was uncertain.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> tonight or this afternoon or you vote tonight or this afternoon or you vote green<00:15:33.360><
• So please vote green.
• So please vote green. state running.
• The clerk will call the name of the member voting remotely. Fogman. Go ahead. Fogman votes no.
• As you may remember, what we voted on this bill on Monday, we had 109 votes going off the House floor

Keywords: 1183, house