Transcript Highlights:

• members, Senate Bill 1161 exempts the fiscal year 2026 appropriation of $750,000 to DPS for the Yuma County
• The other primary concern to the counties is cost.
• My name is Cody Esri, and I'm here to represent the Cochise County Sheriff's Office.
• My name is Cody Esri, and I'm here to represent the Cochise County Sheriff's Office.
• Pinal County is currently participating with this data sharing program.

Summary: The committee heard and advanced several public safety and corrections measures. SB 1161 would prevent $750,000 appropriated to DPS for Yuma County’s Amberly’s Place Family Advocacy Center from lapsing; testimony emphasized that the bill preserves existing funding for crisis response and victim services. The committee also advanced SB 1215, which clarifies the cancer list tied to the occupational disease presumption for firefighters and peace officers and adds retroactivity to June 30, 2021. SB 1270, aimed at retention for Tier 3 corrections employees, would allow optional employer supplemental contributions to defined contribution accounts at specified service intervals, with an amendment capping annual contributions at $5,000 and requiring employer policies; members discussed retention, vesting, and whether the incentive could simply be taken and left after the waiting period. Both SB 1161 and SB 1215 received due pass recommendations, as did SB 1270 after one no vote and several members noting the need for better retention tools. The committee then considered SB 1400, which authorizes law enforcement wellness and crisis response programs and sets confidentiality rules for information shared in those programs. Supporters said the bill would expand access to peer and professional support while preserving public records and misconduct investigation access, but members raised concerns that the privilege language could be too broad for licensed therapists; the sponsor indicated openness to an amendment, and the bill was advanced with members reserving the right to change their votes if the language is not tightened. SB 1538, as a strike-everything amendment, would require workers’ compensation coverage for PTSD treatment for firefighters and peace officers and could include one course of MDMA treatment if federal approval and DEA rescheduling occur by the stated deadline. Supporters described promising clinical trial results and argued the bill is a conditional authorization, while counties opposed the mandate and raised cost concerns; after debate over whether the bill is permissive or mandatory, the committee adopted the strike-everything amendment and gave the bill a due pass recommendation. The committee also passed SB 1537, which renames the Peace Officer Training Equipment Fund as the Public Safety De-escalation and Life Safety Fund and repeals the advisory commission. Supporters said the new name better reflects the fund’s use for de-escalation and less-lethal equipment, while some members opposed the change and preferred the money be used for raises. Finally, the committee began hearing SB 1580, which would appropriate funds for fire incident management support hardware and software and, under a chairman’s amendment, redirect money from the Peace Officer Training Equipment Fund to additional public safety technology and retention/recruitment purposes; testimony focused on regional data-sharing systems and the need for accountability and clarity on how the funds would be spent.

Transcript Highlights:

• I have the counties of Lac qui Parle, Yellow Medicine, and Lyon County, just as well as a sliver of Chippewa
• I have the counties of Lac qui Parle, Yellow Medicine, and Lyon County, just as well as a sliver of Chippewa
• I have the counties of Lac qui Parle, Yellow Medicine, and Lyon County, just as well as a sliver of Chippewa
• </c><00:05:03.560><c> my</c> Ottertail in Western Douglas County my Ottertail in Western Douglas County
• I had a conversation with a county commissioner in Douglas County, and he was talking about the real

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• I'd like to call this hearing of the Assembly Select Committee on Regulatory Authority to order.
• Builders often cite examples where the number and specificity of regulatory authority add significant
• Most land use regulatory authority rests in California with local governments.
• And she said nothing, because that is not within our authority to address.
• Our authority is grounded in the Health and Safety Code and our mandate.

Summary: The Assembly Select Committee on Regulatory Authority held its first hearing to examine how California’s regulatory framework affects housing production, affordability, and timelines. Chair Pacheco and Assemblymember Haney framed the discussion around the state’s housing shortage and the need to reduce costs while maintaining environmental, safety, and community protections. The first panel featured housing experts and industry representatives who argued that state regulations, code complexity, utility constraints, and agency review processes add substantial cost and delay to development. Bill Fulton described overlapping state and local land-use authorities and the tension among housing, coastal protection, climate, and wildfire goals. CBIA’s Chris Ochoa and California Apartment Association representative Bob Raymer said building codes, energy mandates, and agency processes have materially increased per-home costs, and they urged more centralized affordability analysis and greater scrutiny of regulatory impacts. The Bay Area Council’s Louis Marante called for a statewide cost target for housing and stronger timelines and accountability for state agency reviews. The second panel brought in state agencies to explain their roles. HCD said its housing element enforcement, streamlining laws, and technical assistance have helped increase production, shorten entitlement timelines, and improve compliance by local governments. CARB said SB 375 is a planning law that does not directly regulate land use, and argued that regional housing assumptions in sustainable communities strategies are not being fully implemented on the ground. The Coastal Commission said it works with local governments to balance coastal protection, sea-level-rise risk, and housing, and noted recent guidance and pilot efforts to streamline housing approvals in the coastal zone. The Energy Commission said its building energy standards are designed to be cost-effective and save consumers money over time, though they can add some design and documentation complexity. Fish and Wildlife and DTSC both emphasized early engagement and collaboration to reduce delays while protecting natural resources and public health; DTSC said it is refining vapor intrusion guidance and using brownfield grants to support redevelopment. The State Water Resources Control Board said it uses general orders and basin planning to provide predictable permitting while balancing water quality, water rights, and housing needs, and noted billions in grants and loans for water infrastructure and site remediation that can support housing affordability. In response to questions from Assemblymember Haney, several agencies described ongoing coordination across departments, including regular meetings among HCD, CARB, the Coastal Commission, and transportation agencies, as well as broader interagency efforts to reduce redundancies and identify pinch points in project delivery. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken during the hearing; the main outcome was informational testimony and discussion of possible future reforms to improve coordination, predictability, and affordability in state regulatory processes.

Transcript Highlights:

• So it would remove that authority language for their appropriation.
• This would authorize the continuation of the unspent federal funds appropriation authority into the 2025
• And then the county veteran service officers paid 44% more.
• I don't believe that an unelected body should have that authority.
• Subsection 2 of Section 14 authorizes the continuation of unspent federal fund appropriation authority

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The committee took up Senate Bill 2025, the Veterans Home/Veterans Affairs budget, and worked through the long sheet line by line. Members discussed base payroll, salary and health insurance increases, FTE pool adjustments, IT rate increases, operating expenses, transportation grants, the PTSD service dog program, salary equity requests, temporary help/intern funding, a Veterans Benefit Specialist FTE, accrued leave, and several one-time or carryover items including the Fisher House, document scanning, and veterans medical transportation. The committee also reviewed proposed policy language that would shift governance authority for the Veterans Home and Department of Veterans Affairs from the Administrative Committee on Veterans Affairs to the governor, and would remove board authority over salary-setting and related hiring powers. A major portion of the meeting focused on clarifying the commissioner salary equity line and how the agency had shifted operating dollars to fund the commissioner’s current salary increase. After discussion with agency staff and Lonnie, the committee voted to remove the separate commissioner salary equity increase line and instead restore operating funding, ultimately setting the operating line at $50,000 above the prior amount rather than fully funding the executive request. The committee also approved funding for the Veterans Benefit Specialist FTE, approved a carryforward/exemption for accrued leave, approved authority to accept $200,000 in federal transportation grant funds, approved the $500,000 transfers related to veterans homelessness, and approved the exemption language for certain federal/state fiscal recovery funds after discussing whether the funds were properly obligated. On the governance amendment, members expressed concern about making a major policy change in an appropriations bill, but also frustration over the board’s salary actions. After debate, the committee adopted the amendment transferring governance authority to the governor by a 7-1 vote. The committee also approved a smaller amount for veteran service officer salary equity than requested, and rejected funding for temporary salaries and an intern. The chair then directed staff to prepare the amended bill for further action, with the committee planning to revisit it once the revised version was ready.

Transcript Highlights:

• In Catron County and Hidalgo County, what non-profits are functioning at the level of providing that
• It's really spread out among the counties.
• Out of all the counties here, are these 33 counties?
• Center in Bernalillo County.
• It said that you worked with shelters in these various counties, but in my county, Sandoval, we have

Transcript Highlights:

• Since this authority has been provided, the state has given UC authority to finance $4 billion in projects
• We bought eight hospitals last year alone, four in Orange County.
• Orange County.
• I represent 11 very rural counties that don't have a media market.
• For example, in Modoc County, we're partnering quite frequently with Modoc County.

Summary: The committee’s first major discussion focused on higher education facilities across UC, CSU, and the community colleges, with Chair Alvarez framing the issue as a final budget hearing before the May Revise. The LAO presented findings that campuses have grown substantially in buildings and square footage, while classroom and lab utilization remains below legislative standards and deferred maintenance backlogs continue to rise. The LAO also emphasized that the state and segments lack comprehensive data on capital renewal spending and recommended better reporting, clearer funding targets, and long-term planning for renewal and maintenance. UC, CSU, and community college representatives each described large five-year capital plans, aging facilities, seismic and deferred maintenance needs, and the role of student housing, while noting that construction costs are rising faster than inflation. Members questioned the segments about debt service, utilization rates, and how projects are prioritized. UC said its debt service tied to state support is about $665 million annually and described a $30 billion five-year capital financial plan, including housing, medical centers, and building renewal. CSU said it has about $31 billion in five-year needs and more than $8 billion in deferred maintenance, with funding coming from a mix of state-related and one-time sources since the state shifted capital responsibility to CSU. Community colleges said their unmet facilities needs total about $33.5 billion and explained their use of a scoring matrix and FUSION system to rank projects. The chair and members pressed all three systems to better distinguish between projects that are truly shovel-ready and those that are long-term needs, and discussed whether facilities condition data, total cost of ownership, and more standardized metrics should guide future bond proposals. The committee then turned to Proposition 2 and the Governor’s proposed community college capital outlay projects. The Department of Finance said Prop. 2 provides $1.5 billion for community colleges and that the Governor’s budget proposes 29 projects, with two continuing Prop. 51 projects also included. The LAO supported the overall use of the funds but raised concerns about the current 65/35 split between modernization and growth, the unusually large share of gymnasium projects, and some scoring metrics that favor larger campuses and certain regions. Community college officials said the scoring system was developed through participatory governance and would take one to two years to revise, but they supported the funding and agreed to follow up on questions about project categories and the rationale for the weighting. Members also suggested giving more weight to modernization, regional access, and intersegmental or collaborative projects. A final item addressed the CalKids program. The Department of Finance proposed $56,000 ongoing General Fund for three positions, while the LAO recommended approving two positions but rejecting a manager position until the current $7.5 million marketing campaign is evaluated. ScholarShare’s executive director said CalKids has enrolled more than 5 million children, with nearly 600,000 claims and over $45 million distributed, and argued that additional staff and outreach are needed to reach a goal of 1 million claimed scholarships by the end of 2025 and to implement AB 2808. Members asked about marketing effectiveness, data sharing, and eligibility rules, and the program said it is expanding partnerships with Cradle to Career and CSAC. No final vote was taken in the hearing, and the chair indicated the facilities item would be held open.

Transcript Highlights:

• Medina from the County of Los Angeles. Thank you so much. negotiated.
• Medina from the County of Los Angeles. Thank you so much. From Ms.
• Now, the SoCal-REN works in 13 counties.
• So although I'm a local government employee of the County of L.A., through the fiduciary duty and authority
• I also implement BayREN programs for Solano County.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Utilities and Energy held a hearing on how California Public Utilities Commission energy efficiency programs are budgeted, evaluated, and measured for cost-effectiveness. The chair framed the issue as not whether energy efficiency works, but how to ensure ratepayer-funded programs continue to deliver value as the portfolio has shifted from simple measures like lighting to more complex retrofits, electrification, workforce, and equity programs. CPUC staff outlined the statutory framework, the four-year budget cycle, recent spending of about $795 million in 2025, and the use of total system benefit (TSB) and the total resource cost (TRC) test, noting that some programs are exempt from cost-effectiveness requirements at the individual program level but not at the resource acquisition portfolio level. Utility, regional network, implementer, and advocacy witnesses offered differing views on the current metrics. PG&E described its portfolio as cost-effective overall and argued that cost-effectiveness should remain at the portfolio level to allow innovation and multi-year program flexibility. SoCalREN and the Energy Coalition emphasized the value of local government delivery, equity-focused programs, and the need to credit programs for broader benefits such as workforce development, market transformation, and electrification. The Public Advocates Office argued that ratepayer-funded programs should produce benefits greater than costs and raised concerns about the growing share of budgets going to programs that have not met cost-effectiveness thresholds. Several witnesses said the current math is too complicated and that different program types may need different metrics. Committee members repeatedly pressed witnesses on the complexity of the TRC and TSB calculations, the treatment of participant costs, and whether the state should use a simpler or more transparent framework. CPUC staff said the relevant issues are already being addressed in two open proceedings, with one budget application proceeding expected to conclude in roughly the second or third quarter of next year and a broader policy rulemaking ongoing. No votes were taken and no formal action was reported; the hearing functioned as an informational discussion and policy review.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm Representative John Banderrata from District 22, which is here in Ada County.
• For the record, my name is Jordan Redmond, representing District 3 in Kootenai County.
• What I think we're trying to do is restore the authority back to the legislature.
• For the record, my name is Jordan Redmond, representing District 3 in Kootenai County.
• For the record, my name is Jordan Redmond, representing District 3 in Kootenai County.

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:14:26.000><c> Senator</c> Mutual Insurance Authority. Senator Mutual Insurance Authority.
• House Bill County community. as well.
• </c><04:05:25.359><c> pro</c><04:05:25.680><c> prior</c> prior authoration pro prior prior authoration
• ><04:05:28.319><c> will</c><04:05:28.560><c> make</c> authorization process and it will make authorization
• </c> Insurance Authority. Senator McDaniel. Insurance Authority. Senator McDaniel.

Bills: HB567, HB776, HB2, HB568, HB619

Keywords: open records, public access, transparency, government accountability, public agency, dental practice, licensing, administrative regulations, dental assistants, supervision, Medicaid, community engagement, healthcare, managed care, eligibility, public assistance, insurance, public adjuster, claim process, contract requirements

Transcript Highlights:

• Josh Wheeler, representing District 35, which is Teton, Bear Lake, Caribou, Bannock, and Bonneville counties
• He asks what authority exists for firing the person and whether that authority remains with the mayor
• He adds that the city council should have authority to weigh in on employees just as much as the mayor
• Lance Sayers says city council should have authority to weigh in on employees just as much as the mayor
• He says his son Joe is a lieutenant with the Fremont County Sheriff’s Office, and after he appointed

Summary: The committee first removed RS 33446 from the agenda by unanimous consent because Representative McCann was not ready to present it. It then considered RS 33570, a revised candidate residency bill from Representative Raibold. He explained the changes were made in response to prior floor debate and discussions with Representative Scott, including an exemption from the fixed habitation requirement for active military service or a religious mission and an enactment date of January 1, 2027. The committee voted to introduce RS 33570 and send it directly to the second reading calendar. The main item was House Bill 686, sponsored by Representative Wheeler, which would create a narrow nepotism exemption for small cities under 10,000 residents. Wheeler said the bill would not repeal anti-nepotism, bribery, or corruption laws, but would allow hiring relatives only under strict conditions: the job must require specific qualifications, be posted for 45 days, involve documented good-faith recruitment of other applicants, be publicly disclosed, and be approved in an open council meeting, with the related official barred from supervising the employee. Members questioned how the public could challenge violations and whether the bill should expressly address interviewing applicants and firing authority; Wheeler said the bill’s guardrails were intended to cover those issues and was open to minor clarifying language. Testimony largely supported the bill from the perspective of small cities. Lance Sayers of the Association of Idaho Cities said the measure responded to repeated requests from dozens of cities and that city councils should have authority over these hires. Mayor Donald Powell of St. Anthony described examples where qualified relatives could not be hired even when no other applicants existed, and Mayor Robert Berlin of Roberts said small towns sometimes simply go without needed work because of the restriction. Supporters emphasized that the bill was aimed at very small communities with limited labor pools. The committee then voted to send HB 686 to the House floor with a due-pass recommendation, and the motion carried without opposition.

Transcript Highlights:

• Charles County for a point of personal privilege. Gentleman from St. Charles County.
• It affects Jefferson County only, a charter county with two or more water districts in the county.
• In the county.
• Louis County, cities in St. Louis County, and Kansas City. And I've heard you say that before.
• Louis County. Well, Mr.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I think we have an author present. We have an author on committee, at least.
• So I applaud the author.
• So I applaud the author.
• AB 1237, which will authorize the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, L.A.
• Chris McKaley, on behalf of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, proud to be

Summary: The committee heard AB 749, which would create a blue ribbon commission to study equitable access to youth sports and recommend a statewide framework, including coaching standards, PE modernization, and funding models to reduce barriers for families. The author and supporters, including youth sports advocates, educators, coaches, and former athletes, argued that sports improve health, school engagement, and long-term opportunity, while noting racial and income disparities in participation. One member raised concerns that a new commission could add cost and regulatory burdens, but the bill was framed as a study measure rather than immediate regulation. The committee also took up AB 549, aimed at coordinating state and local security planning for major upcoming sporting events such as the FIFA World Cup, Super Bowl, and Olympic and Paralympic Games. Supporters said the bill would improve interagency coordination, protect visitors and communities, and help prevent human trafficking and discrimination during mega-events. Members discussed the need to avoid over-policing and to center community values, but the bill advanced on a due pass recommendation to Appropriations. AB 1291 addressed ticket purchasing for concerts, sports, and other live events by requiring electronic proof of purchase and allowing it to be used for entry if a ticket cannot be accessed through no fault of the buyer. Supporters said the measure would give consumers more certainty and help address problems in a monopolized ticketing market, while opponents from venues, sports teams, and entertainment groups warned it could undermine anti-scalping tools, create security problems, and burden venues with duplicate or fraudulent proofs of purchase. The committee approved the bill on a due pass as amended basis to Privacy and Consumer Protection, with the roll held open for absent members. The consent calendar item, AB 644, was also approved.

Transcript Highlights:

• I also want to specifically thank Representative Jim Nash and Senator Zach Duckworth for authorizing
• I serve in District 48A, Central Carver County, and I'm the author in the House of a wildly popular bill
• ,</c><00:02:46.720><c> and</c> District 48A, Central Carver County, and District 48A, Central Carver
• County, and I'm<00:02:47.959><c> the</c><00:02:48.200><c> author</c><00:02:48.520><c> in</c><00:02:48.640
• in the in the house of a I'm the author in the in the house of a wildly<00:02:51.080><c> popular</c>

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The meeting was a press event and advocacy push for HF 4090 and SF 4515, bills that would modernize Minnesota’s charitable meat raffle rules. Speakers, including Amanda Jackson of Allied Charities, Rep. Jim Nash, Sen. Judy Seeberger, and Sen. Zach Duckworth, argued that the current ticket and prize limits are decades old and no longer reflect inflation or current meat prices. They said raising the ticket cap to $5 and the prize limit to $200 would help charitable organizations keep raffles attractive and financially viable without expanding gambling overall. Testimony from representatives of the American Legion and a youth wrestling club emphasized that meat raffles help fund veterans’ programs, youth sports, scholarships, travel costs, and other local needs. Speakers also said the events support bars, restaurants, and local meat markets, and that the money stays in the community. Several lawmakers described the proposal as bipartisan and noncontroversial, while also criticizing efforts to tie it to other legislative disputes. One speaker said the Senate had just taken a procedural step to bring the bill directly to the floor, and another said the conference committee report had failed but could still be revived. The event concluded with a mock meat raffle demonstration and a call for a clean vote on the legislation. No formal committee vote on the bill was taken during the transcript, but the speakers said the measure remained alive procedurally and positioned for further action in the Senate and House.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:37:53.359><c> and</c> million pounds, serving 26 counties and million pounds, serving 26 counties
• ,</c><01:20:09.679><c> or</c> to be the largest in Delta County, or to be the largest in Delta County
• Today, Gran lives across Mesa County.
• He loved Bucks County.
• And he lived his loved Bucks County.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It can be adapted by cities and counties.
• It can be adapted by cities and counties.
• I'm a township supervisor, and we recently saw a lot of the local authority that the townships and counties
• So if... it comes down to townships and even counties.
• Mercer County just lifted their moratorium.

Summary: The committee held its first meeting on artificial intelligence and data centers, establishing its purpose as a study and policy-development body rather than one aimed at producing many bills. Majority Leader Hogue urged members to move quickly, focus on federal and other states’ AI laws, consider possible federal preemption, child protections, and the siting and economic impacts of data centers. Committee leadership echoed that the goal is practical, balanced governance that protects North Dakota while allowing innovation to continue. Legislative Council staff provided a background memo and NCSL presented a detailed overview of AI concepts and the current state legislative landscape. The presentations distinguished narrow AI, generative AI, agentic AI, and theoretical AGI/ASI, and summarized major state policy themes: comprehensive AI laws in states such as Utah, Colorado, Texas, California, and Illinois; targeted laws on deepfakes, chatbots, health, education, notifications, and digital likeness; and growing use of appropriations and agency inventories. Members asked about Colorado’s repeal and reenactment, Texas’s sandbox and training provisions, oversight structures, and whether AI regulation is bipartisan; presenters said most issues cut across party lines, with broad agreement on child safety and deepfakes but more division on broader regulatory approaches. The federal update focused on executive orders, preemption, and congressional activity. NCSL described a White House framework favoring a single federal standard, a DOJ litigation task force, Commerce Department review of state laws, and possible funding conditions tied to state AI policy, though no formal state-law challenge had yet occurred. The presentation also covered a recent executive order creating a voluntary federal vetting process for advanced frontier models after safety concerns, and congressional proposals including a failed 10-year state moratorium, Senator Blackburn’s child-safety bills, the Kids Online Safety Act, a House-passed children’s digital safety package, a Senate data center moratorium proposal, and a House ratepayer/data-center bill. The committee took no formal action beyond receiving testimony and asking questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• Welcome to this week's County and Municipal Government Committee meeting.
• </c> 2008 while renting from a county 2008 while renting from a county commissioner's<00:13:03.839><c
• </c> shall not apply to any county shall not apply to any county &gt;&gt; except<00:28:45.919><c> as<
• And this puts those counties that &gt;&gt; Yes.
• </c><00:29:27.600><c> were</c> Madison, Montgomery, those counties were Madison, Montgomery, those counties

Bills: SB249, SB259, HB67, HB214, SB249, SB259, HB67, HB214

Keywords: municipal tax, license fee, local tax increase, ordinance, public hearing, 30-day notice, municipal notice requirements, city council, town council, Alabama municipalities, Code of Alabama 1975, Section 11-45-2, open meetings website, newspaper publication, local government finance, tax transparency, fee increase, municipal ordinance procedure, University of South Alabama, Board of Trustees

Transcript Highlights:

• No one from Kerr County was on that, correct? We do not believe anybody from Kerr County was on it.
• The county judge was away from the county, and we have no information that Kerr County participated in
• I thought that panel was compelling, which included the Kerr County and Kendall County representatives
• Upper Guadalupe River Authority Board.
• Senator Flores [ID: member_3042], your home county, or one of your counties that you represent.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 655, by the Health and Welfare Committee, an act relating to preceptor prior authorization
• And the question for the author would be, how in the world are you going to provide written notice then
• How precisely is a county or city supposed to know who they can or cannot regulate?
• 32 and 33, it essentially says that you can have nothing that allows for a county or city to be able
• How precisely is a county or city supposed to know who they can or cannot regulate? Thank you, Mr.

Summary: The House convened with 68 members present, approved the February 12, 2026 journal, and received messages from the Senate, including referral of House Joint Memorial 10 for enrolling and return of Senate Joint Memorial 107 signed by the Speaker. Standing committee reports advanced several bills: House Bills 607, 528, 530, 519, and 599 were sent to second reading, while House Bills 522 and 570 were placed on general orders. House Concurrent Resolution 27, honoring Idaho civilians who served on Wake Island during World War II, was referred for printing. The House also introduced a large group of new bills, including measures on gold and silver coin, elections and presidential primaries, midwifery, foreign adversary investments, retirement and public safety death benefits, building codes, travel insurance, portable benefits, litigation financing, manufactured homes, anti-cancer medications, interest rates, state sovereignty, big game depredation claims, hunting as the state sport, police dogs, preceptor prior authorization exemptions, student data collection, and charter school admissions; all were referred for printing. On third reading, Senate Bill 1225 was moved to the top of the calendar and passed the House 67-1 after debate describing it as a public records and university presidential search bill that changes the disclosure rule from five finalists to a sole finalist and requires public updates and a 10-day public review period before final selection. House Bill 561 was sent to general orders after discussion of flag displays, including allowing the Basque flag and limiting certain city flagpole displays. House Bill 520, an Office of Administrative Hearings measure standardizing notice requirements in contested cases, passed 66-2 after concerns were raised about proving receipt of mailed notice. House Bill 579, updating justifiable homicide language to broaden who may be defended, passed 68-1. House Bill 580, repealing antiquated or unused criminal statutes, passed 68-1. House Bill 581, creating a formal process for legislative review of Supreme Court rules, passed 65-5. House Bill 583, the short-term rental bill, drew the most extensive debate. Supporters argued it protects private property rights and prevents local governments from effectively banning short-term rentals through restrictive ordinances, while opponents warned it weakens protections for residential neighborhoods and shifts enforcement burdens onto neighbors and local complaints. Several members declared Rule 80 conflicts, including ownership of short-term rentals or related businesses. After debate, the bill passed 54-16 and was sent to the Senate. The House then held the remaining third-reading bills for one legislative day, received the enrolled House Joint Memorial 10 back for the Senate President’s signature, made announcements about committee meetings and events, and adjourned until 11 a.m. on Friday, February 13, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, we then authorize the remainder of those funds once they are available.
• Amanda Kirchner on behalf of the County Welfare Directors Association.
• On behalf of Nourish County, thank you.
• Nicole Wardleman on behalf of the Orange County Board of Supervisors in San Bernardino County.
• We work in both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's the appropriation authority, the permission to spend.
• We have one-time projects that will ask for authority.
• We have one-time projects that will ask for authority.
• So they will ask for the spending authority for the same money that we’re asking for the spending authority
• They will ask for the spending authority for the same money that we’re asking for the spending authority

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee heard budget presentations and questions for the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Office of Species Conservation, and the Office of the Attorney General. Fish and Game’s budget was described as largely dedicated and federal funding with no general fund support, with discussion of ongoing and one-time enhancements for fisheries inflation, habitat projects, Good Neighbor Authority work, depredation claims, chronic wasting disease testing, and communications. Director Jim Fredericks also reviewed the new nonresident tag draw system, access challenges on private lands, and the department’s role in habitat work and species management. Members raised concerns about depredation claim shortfalls, survey and advisory committee processes, predator management, and the overlap between Fish and Game and the Office of Species Conservation on habitat and endangered species work. The Office of Species Conservation presentation focused on its role coordinating state actions for threatened, endangered, and candidate species, mostly through federal and miscellaneous revenue funds. Administrator Mike Edmondson explained that the office often serves as the policy and administrative lead while Fish and Game carries out much of the field work, and he described metrics for sage grouse, salmon and steelhead, and grizzly bear-related efforts. He also said the office has been working with the Department of Energy and Mineral Resources on a possible merger, with some staff reductions under consideration, and answered questions about grizzly bear delisting, wolf litigation, and tribal consultation. Attorney General Raul Labrador then argued that his office has produced significant results without asking for new money, but said the committee’s proposed reductions would force furloughs or position cuts and asked for $980,000 to be restored. He highlighted the ICAC unit’s elimination of a cyber-tip backlog, increased arrests, consumer protection recoveries, and expanded appellate and civil litigation work defending state laws. Members asked about the source of recovered funds, the office’s flexibility to absorb cuts, and whether the state could work on a framework to transfer incarcerated undocumented offenders to federal custody for deportation. The committee ended by noting upcoming budget-setting work and adjourned until the next morning.