Video & Transcript : 'sensitive discussions' :

Page 311 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session - 04/13/26

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, please vote. other discussion before we vote on final other discussion before we vote on final
  • Any other discussion before we vote on House File 3802?
  • Any other discussion before we vote on House File 3802?
  • Any other discussion before we vote on House File 3802?
  • Any other discussion before we vote on House File 3802?
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

04/07/2026 - House Floor Session

Arizona House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any discussion? No, sir.
  • Any discussion? No, sir.
  • Any further discussion?
  • Any discussion? Seeing none, SB 1372, as amended, do pass. Any discussion?
  • Any discussion?
Summary: The House convened, opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, approved the prior journal, and recognized the Doctor of the Day, Dr. Sarah Coles. Members also introduced a number of guests in the gallery, including representatives from the Arizona LEND Program, Friends of the Salt River Wild Horses, and other visitors. The House then received communications from the Governor and moved into Committee of the Whole to consider Calendar One. In Committee of the Whole, members debated SB 1280, a bill concerning Mexican gray wolves and the use of public funds to transport them. An amendment offered by Representative Gutierrez, nicknamed the “Cruella DeVille Act,” was adopted after extended discussion about wolf conservation, ecosystem impacts, and whether the bill would interfere with wildlife recovery efforts. The underlying bill then received a due pass recommendation. The committee also recommended due pass for SB 1418 and SB 1785, and the House later adopted the Committee of the Whole report, placing SB 1280, SB 1418, and SB 1785 on third reading while retaining SB 1200 on the calendar. The House then considered Calendar Two. SB 1053, dealing with concealed carry permit fees, drew debate over whether the fee reduction was revenue-neutral and whether the bill should instead focus on training requirements; it received a due pass recommendation. SB 1259 also received due pass without debate. SB 1372, relating to health care provider recruitment and anesthesia access, was amended and then recommended do pass. SB 1475, which would bar students convicted of certain serious offenses from participating in interscholastic activities, prompted strong debate over student discipline versus second chances, and it too received a due pass recommendation. SB 1478 received a technical floor amendment changing its effective date and was then recommended do pass as amended. The House adopted the committee report, sending SB 1053, SB 1259, and SB 1475 to third reading and properly engrossing SB 1372 and SB 1478. On third reading, the House passed SB 1078, SB 1107, SB 1123, and SB 1142. SB 1142, a federal education tax credit bill, generated the most debate, with opponents arguing it would divert resources from public schools and primarily benefit wealthier families, while supporters said it would not affect state revenues and would allow Arizona families to benefit from an existing federal credit. The final vote on SB 1142 was 33 ayes to 26 nays, and the House then adjourned until 10 a.m. on Wednesday, April 8, 2026.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:03:14.879><c> Madam</c> second no further discussion Madam second no further discussion Madam
  • </c><00:05:25.120><c> on</c> that out uh if there's any discussion on that out uh if there's any discussion
  • Any further discussion? Any questions?
  • </c><00:12:15.880><c> any</c> any further discussion any any further discussion any questions<00:12:18.360
  • I've had numerous discussions with the bill sponsor.
Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture met with a quorum and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call. The committee first considered House Bill 216, which would correct a conflict created when an office was moved into the Department of Agriculture by restoring grant and loan eligibility for Department of Agriculture employees while keeping the prohibition in place for employees of the office of policy. The bill was approved unanimously and sent on to the Senate floor. The committee then revisited Senate Bill 122 after concerns from the prior meeting. Members adopted a committee substitute that clarified local governments may regulate the covered businesses but not ban them outright, and that fines and fees go back to the local authorities doing the regulating. During final consideration, Senator Deneen, Senator Reed, and Senator Richardson voted no, citing concerns about enforcement, inspection, and potential bad actors, while Senator Webb supported the bill as a needed regulatory scheme. The motion passed and the bill advanced. House Bill 391, dealing with Kentucky honey production, was also approved. Representative Jason Nemes and industry witnesses said the bill would raise the threshold for requiring a certified honey house from 150 gallons to 500 gallons, add language requiring “pure and unadulterated” Kentucky-produced honey, and support local beekeepers without creating additional public health risk. Members discussed whether the limit should be removed entirely, the cost of honey houses, and concerns about imported or adulterated honey. The committee passed the bill to the Senate floor. Senator Yates later registered a no vote on Senate Bill 122 and yes votes on House Bill 216 and Senate Bill 171, though Senate Bill 171 was passed over for further work and not heard that day.
NY

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Standing Committee on Housing, Construction, and Community Development - 05/04/2026

Housing, Construction, and Community Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any questions or discussion? The bill. We've got a motion to report to the floor.
  • Any questions or discussion?
  • Any questions or discussion? The bill.
  • Any questions or discussion? The bill is reported.
  • Any questions or discussion?
Keywords: 993, senate, all
Summary: The New York State Senate Committee on Housing, Construction, and Community Development met on May 4 under Chair Brian Kavanagh and considered an eight-bill agenda, much of it consisting of measures previously sponsored by former Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and now carried by other senators. Kavanagh noted the committee was in the first full week of May, with 32 days left in session and ongoing budget negotiations that include housing issues. The committee moved through the agenda without substantive debate on most bills. The committee reported several bills to the floor, including S.6263 (requiring certain out-of-state affordable housing owners to maintain escrow accounts for New York affordable units), S.8956 (transferring the Potsdam Housing Authority to the Canton Housing Authority), S.9571 (allowing multiple transfers of low-income housing tax credits), S.9677 (the City of Buffalo Historic Preservation Receivership Act), S.9716 (expanding the definition of family members in public housing law), S.9907 (marshals’ filing requirements for eviction notices), S.9908 (calculating rent reductions from the date services were actually diminished), and S.9914 (requiring replacement units to retain the same protected status after demolition or major renovation). Several of these bills had previously passed the Senate in earlier sessions. Most measures were advanced by motion and second, with some recorded negative votes or votes to advance without recommendation from minority members, but no bill was defeated. The transcript includes some repetition of bill readings, but the final action on each listed bill was reporting it out of committee, generally to the floor and, for S.9914, to Cities 1.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 13th, 2026

Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any discussion? I have an amendment ending in number when a...
  • Any discussion? Representative Walsh Moore. Thank you.
  • Any further discussion?
  • Any discussion? Seeing none, I have a substitute ending in point... Any discussion?
  • Any discussion? Representative Walsh Moore? Thank you to comment.
Keywords: 959, house, all
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Insurance REVISED: SB1592 - Removed Apr 7th, 2026

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Seeing a due pass and a second, will there be any discussion or debate?
  • Will there be any discussion or debate?
  • Seeing a due pass and a second, whether there be any discussion or debate.
  • Let's think another discussion in debate.
  • Will there be any discussion or debate?
Summary: The committee considered several bills and moved each one forward without opposition. Senate Bill 1684, presented by Representative Bayshore, would require highway remediation companies to carry at least $3 million in liability insurance before entering roadways to protect the public; it passed 6-0 and was recommended to the next committee. Senate Bill 378, also presented by Bayshore, would modernize the multi-county bail bonds statute by adding flexibility in writing capacity and strengthening financial oversight and transparency; it passed 6-0 and was recommended for the floor. Senate Bill 1447, presented by Representative Marti, would change requirements for the RFP for the state employee prescription drug plan. Marti used the presentation to sharply criticize the State Chamber and outside messaging about the bill, arguing the legislation would not raise drug costs and that similar laws in other states have produced savings; the bill passed 6-0. Senate Bill 1920, presented by Representative Tedford, would raise the salvage title threshold for autos from 60% to 70% to align more closely with neighboring states and avoid prematurely totaling vehicles; it passed 6-0 and was sent to the next committee. After a brief suspension, the committee took up Senate Bill 1443, presented by Representative Sneed on behalf of Chairman Chad Caldwell, which concerns anesthesia services. No questions or debate were raised, and the bill passed 6-0. The meeting then adjourned.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

04/01/2026 - Senate Floor Session

Arizona Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any discussion?
  • Any discussion?
  • Any discussion?
  • All right, any discussion?
  • Any discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. All those opposed say nay.
Keywords: 1182, all
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 13 (1-23-26)

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is there any discussion?
  • Is there any discussion? House Bill 312. Is there any discussion?
  • </c> for discussion in the matter. for discussion in the matter.
  • Chair recognizes a lady from Fyet 93 for discussion of the matter.
  • </c> for discussion of the matter. for discussion of the matter.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

04/16/2026 - Senate Floor Session

Arizona Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any discussion on the amendment?
  • Any discussion?
  • Any discussion? Any discussion on the amendment?
  • Any discussion on the Angius floor amendment?
  • Any discussion on the amendment?
Keywords: 1182, all
MD

Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session, 3/23/2026 #3

Maryland Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:07:58.280><c> Without</c> discussion? Any objections? Without discussion? Any objections?
  • Any discussion?
  • </c><00:09:58.640><c> Any</c><00:09:58.760><c> discussion?
  • If not, clerk will further discussion?
  • Any discussion?
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Agenda Feb 17th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any discussion on that motion? ...601-2501 to July 1, 2026. Any discussion on that motion?
  • Any discussion on that motion?
  • There's been discussion of dentistry moving into the dental.
  • Any discussion on that motion? I think they liked it.
  • So any further discussion on the motion?
Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee met to consider a series of temporary and pending administrative rules, mostly from the Division of Occupational and Professional Licenses (DOPL) for health-related boards. Early actions focused on fee reductions or fee flexibility for the Idaho Boards of Midwifery and Nursing, and the Board of Dentistry, with members asking about cash balances, why refund language was removed in one rule, and how merged boards and fee holidays might affect future rates. The committee voted to extend the temporary rules to July 1, 2026 and then approved the corresponding final rules for midwifery, dentistry, and nursing. Members also discussed a nursing reinstatement fee set at $35 to align with Idaho Code and standardize fees across boards. The committee then considered a proposed fee increase for the Occupational Therapy Board, which DOPL said was needed because the board’s cash balance was below statutory limits and projected to go negative without action. Testimony described prior cost-cutting efforts, including reduced staff time, travel, and meetings, but several members objected to the increase as a tax-like burden and questioned whether other budget changes or board mergers could solve the problem. The Senate had already rejected the docket, and the House committee ultimately voted to reject it as well. Members also raised concerns about whether DOPL consolidation has increased costs for smaller boards and whether the board’s public safety role justified licensure. The committee approved a new Speech, Hearing, and Communication Services rule creating a video remote interpreting provider license authorized by House Bill 311, with a $150 fee for up to five interpreters at a business. DOPL said the license is new nationally, had no public comments, would not affect the general fund, and would be the lowest fee of its kind in the country. Finally, the committee considered a Physical Therapy Licensure Board fee increase from $25 to $40, which DOPL said was needed because the board’s cash balance was low and projected to decline further despite cost reductions and modernization through the online licensure system. Members debated the impact of DOPL consolidation and fee disparities across professions, but after a substitute motion, the committee voted to reject that docket as well. The meeting concluded with announcements about visiting physicians from the WHAMMY program and then adjournment.
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Agenda Feb 4th, 2026

Transportation and Defense

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is there discussion on that motion?
  • Is there any discussion on that motion?
  • Is there any discussion on that motion? Seeing no discussion, all in favor signify by saying aye.
  • Is there any discussion on the motion?
  • Is there any discussion on the motion?
Keywords: 989, all
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Agenda Feb 2nd, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • We met with DOPL back in October of 2025 and discussed this with them.
  • Is there any discussion on the motion? Senator Lenny: “Thank you, Mr. Chair.
  • I would encourage you to work with your legal counsel to discuss that.
  • Is there any more discussion on docket 24-0601-2501?
  • Any more discussion on the substitute motion?
Summary: The Senate Health and Welfare Committee approved the January 20, 2026 minutes and then took up several DOPL administrative fee and rule dockets. The first major item was the Physical Therapy Licensure Board fee rule, where DOPL said the board’s cash balance had fallen below statutory targets because of higher overhead, the move to the Chinden campus, and the transition to the OASIS licensing system, while licensee numbers were also declining. The Idaho Physical Therapy Association supported the increase to preserve an independent board. Some senators argued the committee needed a fuller cost-benefit analysis and objected to raising fees instead of using cross-subsidization or broader restructuring, but the committee ultimately approved the rule on a roll call vote. The committee then reconsidered the Occupational Therapy Licensure Board fee rule after a prior tie vote. DOPL said the board’s reserves were down to about 20% of expenditures and would be exhausted by fiscal year 2027, even after personnel and travel cuts, and proposed doubling several fees. Committee counsel explained that a rejection requires findings of fact under Idaho Code, which prompted discussion about the proper procedure for rule rejection. After debate, the committee voted to reject the fee increase and then approved the rest of the rule package. Next, the committee reviewed the Drinking Water and Wastewater Professionals rules, which included several technical licensing changes and a fee increase intended to restore the board’s cash balance to at least 30%. A senator raised concerns about federal versus state control in water regulation, but the committee approved the docket with the fee section excluded. Finally, the committee revisited the Acupuncture Board fee rule, where DOPL proposed a 100% to 150% fee increase to address financial shortfalls. Testimony included a board official’s explanation that the board needed the increase to remain solvent and a senator’s anecdotal support from South Dakota practitioners, but other senators argued the increase was excessive and unsupported. A motion to reject the acupuncture fee increase failed, and the committee then approved the docket, with the meeting adjourned afterward.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/21/2026 - Senate Public Safety

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any further discussion? Seeing none? Seeing none? Please move the bill.
  • Members, any discussion on the bill? Quite a bunch today.
  • All right, well, seeing no discussion, is that our Farnsworth...
  • Any further discussion? Seeing none, I move the bill.
  • So you try to stay—and we had a discussion at that time, it was with Mr.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Jobs and Economic Development - 04/15/26

Jobs and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, any discussion on on Finance. Members, any discussion on that<00:31:16.080><c> motion?
  • Members, any discussion? amendment. Members, any discussion?
  • </c> member discussion and amendments. member discussion and amendments.
  • Uh<01:09:38.880><c> no</c><01:09:39.000><c> discussion.</c> Uh no discussion. Uh no discussion.
  • </c> discussion on that motion? discussion on that motion?
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Education (04/14/2026)

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Second. >> Any discussion on it? >> See no discussion.
  • I think we have some discussion. Just discussion. We do have discussion. Thank you, Madam Chair.
  • Discussion.
  • Discussion.
  • Discussion.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Labor, Health & Social Services Committee, March 2, 2026

Labor, Health & Social Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • We require... discuss that here or discuss on the discuss that here or discuss on the floor<00:48:35.920
  • Additional discussion or &gt;&gt; committee. Additional discussion or amendments?
  • Discussion on the amendment.
  • </c> Discussion on the amendment. Discussion on the amendment. &gt;&gt; Question. Okay, Mr.
  • Any further discussion Okay.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session-Day 5, February 13, 2026-AM

Wyoming House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is there any discussion? discussion? discussion?
  • </c> &gt;&gt; Any further discussion? &gt;&gt; Any further discussion?
  • Any further &gt;&gt; Any further discussion? Any further discussion?
  • </c> discuss more then. Any questions? discuss more then. Any questions?
  • Any discussion? discussion? discussion? Absent.<01:48:27.760><c> Any</c><01:48:28.000><c> objection?
Keywords: 916, all
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Agenda Mar 25th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any discussion on that motion? Mr.
  • Is there any discussion on the motion? Senator Robbie. Mr.
  • Is there any discussion on the motion? Senator Robbie. Mr.
  • There was no discussion. All those in favor said aye. Aye. Any opposed?
  • There was no discussion. All those in favor said aye. Aye. Any opposed?
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 897, which revises Idaho’s data center sales tax exemption. The sponsor said the bill adds new eligibility criteria tied to electricity service agreements that fully recapture costs and to efficient water use, narrows the exemption so it applies only to internal server equipment rather than construction materials, limits the exemption to 20 years instead of indefinitely, and requires annual Tax Commission reporting on foregone revenue. He also noted the bill’s property tax provisions may need more work because they could affect existing entities not involved in drafting, and he asked that the bill be sent to the 14th order for possible amendment. The committee agreed and adopted that motion. The committee then heard House Bill 926, which expands the community infrastructure district tool so counties can create CIDs outside a city’s comprehensive plan. The sponsor said the goal is to ensure infrastructure is built before growth and that new development pays its own costs rather than shifting them to existing property owners. A representative from Tamarack Resort testified in support, explaining that the change would allow a large development outside city planning areas to finance roads, utilities, and other off-site improvements through district bonds and special assessments. After questions about how CID financing works and how obligations are allocated over time, the committee voted to send the bill to the floor with a due pass recommendation. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 934, a technical cleanup bill for last year’s education tax credit law. The sponsor explained that the changes clarify student age eligibility, define tutoring as academic instruction, allow curriculum from multiple vendors, prevent families from combining the advance payment with a prior-year look-back credit, and clarify that students participating only in non-credit extracurricular activities such as sports are not considered enrolled for purposes of the credit. Members asked about impacts on public schools and extracurricular fees, and the sponsor said sports fees are not reimbursable under the credit and that the bill is intended to avoid double payment. The committee then voted to send the bill to the floor with a due pass recommendation. Afterward, the committee approved several sets of minutes and thanked its page, Grace Louder, for her service.
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Agenda Feb 24th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any discussion on the motion?
  • Any discussion on the motion?
  • Any discussion on the motion?
  • Any discussion on the motion? Thank you. A due pass recommendation. Any discussion on the motion?
  • Committee, any further discussion on the motion?
Summary: The Senate Commerce Committee first approved the minutes from February 12, 2026, and then voted to send the gubernatorial reappointment of Trent Nate to the Idaho Health Insurance Exchange Board to the full Senate with a recommendation for confirmation. The committee then heard several code-cleanup bills from Senator Todd Lakey. Senate Bill 1274 would remove obsolete references in state law related to the transfer of county public defender employees, comp time, and an employee problem-solving procedure; Senate Bill 1275 would delete outdated provisions concerning veterans’ assets and the North Idaho Veterans Home; and Senate Bill 1273 would repeal several obsolete PERSI-related provisions tied to old retirement and contribution arrangements. Each of those bills drew no testimony or opposition and was sent to the Senate floor with a due-pass recommendation. The committee spent most of the meeting on Senate Bill 1319, the Emergency Care Affordability Act, sponsored by Senator Burt. The bill would create a new chapter in Title 41 governing billing and reimbursement for out-of-network freestanding emergency rooms, requiring them to accept the local in-network allowed amount for emergency services from state-regulated health plans, disclose that they do not accept Medicare, Medicaid, or TRICARE, and allow self-funded plans to opt in. Supporters, including Blue Cross of Idaho and the Association of Health Plans, argued that freestanding ERs are exploiting the federal No Surprises Act and its independent dispute resolution process by sending nearly all claims to arbitration at inflated rates, which they said raises premiums for Idaho consumers and state employee health plans. They said the bill is intended to address a loophole and does not affect hospital ERs or other emergency billing disputes. Committee members raised questions about EMTALA, federal preemption, whether the bill targets one business model, and whether patients are actually being balance-billed. Supporters said EMTALA still requires treatment, but the bill is aimed at billing practices and transparency, not access to emergency care. Some senators expressed concern about singling out one provider type and possible legal issues, while others said the bill was justified because insurers are required to cover emergency care and the current federal dispute process is driving up costs. After discussion, the committee approved Senate Bill 1319 on a 6-3 roll call vote and sent it to the Senate floor with a do-pass recommendation.