Video & Transcript : 'campaign planning' :

Page 310 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 17th, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Regulated health plans.
  • HB 2516 requires insurers that already... offer Medigap plans to those 65 and older to offer plans at
  • a plan.
  • Right now, the only supplemental plan that someone under 65 is offered is Plan A. ...doesn't pay for
  • All the other plans are lettered plans. I think A through M or N.
Committee: House Insurance
AR

Arkansas 2026 Regular Session

ALC-PEER Mar 17th, 2026

ALC-PEER

Transcript Highlights:
  • What is your plan since you're not approved here?
  • And we've allowed them to budget pay plan and their annual operating plan.
  • So what's the plan?
  • But getting to my question, before the pay plan, we had a thing at the HDCs, a differential pay plan.
  • So prior to the pay plan, So prior to the pay plan being implemented this last July, we were essentially
Committee: All ALC-PEER
Keywords: 1204, all
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 9th, 2026 at 01:40 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Do they have a plan? There was no plan. Just be honest. I mean, we're going to try to help you.
  • to put together an economic recovery plan or assistance plan?
  • or assistance plan?
  • and site readiness plans.
  • and site readiness plans.
Keywords: 996, all
ND

North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session

Government Finance Committee Jun 25th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Government Finance Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • What is their plan there?
  • 2020 plan.
  • And we presented a plan. They asked for a five-year plan. Well, five-year plan means two sessions.
  • About what the plan is.
  • Plan reviews.
Keywords: 908, all
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations and Budget Education Subcommittee Jan 22nd, 2026 at 09:00 am

A&B Education Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that added to the liabilities of the plan.
  • Plans actually removed the cola assumption from the calculation, which improved the health of the plan
  • You know, that's the defined benefit plan Really, it's the employer who bears the plan sponsor's risk
  • The reason it's important to build it into the plan design is because then we can plan for it, then we
  • That second bullet point: if we could, I think a cola is a sustainable plan design if you can plan for
Keywords: 914, all
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement Apr 28th, 2026

Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement

Transcript Highlights:
  • plan.
  • Moving to who participates in the plan on page three.
  • That is the most recent snapshot of the plan.
  • for the 2011 plan.
  • We are a mature pension plan, and that’s not uncommon for a plan— and I say mature, we have more retirees
Summary: The Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement held an informational hearing on the Missouri State Employees’ Retirement System (MOSERS) to review its long-term financial condition, funding status, investment performance, experience study results, and possible legislation. MOSERS staff explained that the plan is a statutorily created defined benefit system covering state employees, several colleges and quasi-governmental entities, with an 11-member board and outside actuarial and investment consultants. They reported the June 30, 2025 valuation showed a funded ratio of 55.4%, assets of about $9.6 billion, liabilities of about $17.4 billion, and a FY27 actuarial employer rate of 27.44%, which the board raised to a 32% minimum contribution rate under a policy adopted in 2023. MOSERS attributed the funding decline over time to several factors: reductions in the assumed investment return from 8.5% to 6.95%, mortality assumption updates, a move from open to closed amortization, and especially weak payroll growth and a shrinking active workforce. Staff said the minimum contribution policy is intended to accelerate UAL paydown and could bring the plan to 80% funded by 2037 rather than 2041, assuming all assumptions are met. The committee also discussed the recent experience study, which kept the investment return assumption at 6.95% and made only modest assumption changes, and a proposed 2026 bill package (SB 1557 and SB 1054) that would automatically refund small balances under $1,000 to terminated non-vested members and add auto-escalation to the deferred compensation plan. A substantial portion of the hearing focused on investment strategy and why MOSERS has lagged some peers. The investment consultant said historical underperformance was driven mainly by asset allocation choices that emphasized a more risk-balanced, diversified portfolio with less public equity exposure than peers during a period when equities performed very strongly. He said the board adopted a more equity-oriented allocation in 2024 and is phasing it in over eight quarters, with recent short-term results improving and the portfolio outperforming its policy benchmark. Members also asked about the effect of inactive members, the rationale for the higher employer contribution, and whether the current board should be held responsible for past decisions; MOSERS officials emphasized that the current board is trying to correct course and that pension funding changes take time. The hearing also touched on ongoing litigation against a former private equity manager, Catalyst Capital, with MOSERS saying it has spent about $20 million in legal fees so far and that the case remains on appeal. The committee took no formal vote and adjourned after the informational presentation and questions.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee Jan 15th, 2026

Utilities and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • What is the plan to move forward?
  • planning.
  • It's recognized in the state's climate action plans. Climate action plans.
  • I can start with that from a transmission planning perspective.
  • planning being led by the Public Utilities Commission.
Keywords: 988, house, all
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Select Committee on School Finance Recalibration, January 22, 2026 - AM

Select Committee on School Finance Recalibration

Transcript Highlights:
  • plans.
  • Z premium insurance plan. That'd be Z premium insurance plan.
  • So that the state plan state plan.
  • So, just plan or a WSBA sponsored plan.
  • I've read the entire state plan. I've read the entire Whisbait plan. I've read the entire web plan.
Keywords: 916, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • water plan or the state water plan because it does not protect. ...our natural resources of the state
  • I'm sure you're aware there's planned developments and concept plans in every city across the North
  • It's a smaller portion of our plan.
  • Of state water planning projects under the existing law, just keeping that separation between planning
  • It's a 50,000 square foot plan. It's long-term, high-level planning.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Pension Funding Council Oct 8th, 2025

Pension Funding Council

Transcript Highlights:
  • Also want to point out that, short of a plan merger, assets from one plan can't be used to pay for benefits
  • of another plan.
  • And as of the 2024 measurement date, all open plans, which are the plans that still allow new entrants
  • They vary by plan.
  • and the actual experience for the plan.
Summary: The Pension Funding Council met on October 8 with introductions from council members and staff, then received a detailed presentation from the Office of the State Actuary on long-term economic assumptions and the state pension systems’ financial condition. OSA reported that the combined pension systems are currently 100% funded on a smoothed basis, with open plans above 95% funded, and that legacy Plan 1 systems remain on a path toward full funding under current policy. The actuaries recommended updating assumptions to 3% inflation, 3.5% general salary growth, and a 7.25% investment return, while keeping Plan 1 membership growth at 1%. They also explained asset smoothing, the role of recent strong investment returns, and the expected budget impacts of the recommended changes. Representatives from the Economic and Revenue Forecast Council and the State Investment Board offered supporting perspectives, generally describing the assumptions as reasonable and consistent with their own outlooks. The council also heard an overview of the Long-Term Services and Supports Trust Program (WACares) from DSHS and OSA. Program staff described the program’s social insurance structure, premium collection, benefit eligibility, and upcoming implementation milestones. OSA reported that the program’s first actuarial valuation showed a positive actuarial balance under the base scenario and recommended no change to the current 0.58% premium rate during the program’s early learning phase, noting that future changes would depend on experience and the program’s risk-management framework. OSA also said the recommendation would remain the same regardless of the outcome of the pending ballot measure affecting investment options. During public comment, a representative of the Washington State School Retirees Association urged continued work on Plan 1 funding and related legislation, while the Association of Washington Cities cautioned against increasing pension assumptions in a way that could raise future employer costs and reduce flexibility for current local government services. In action, the council adopted a motion to maintain the current long-term economic assumptions by a 4-2 vote, adopted the recommendation to keep the WACares premium rate at 0.58% by a 6-0 vote, and then elected Katie Chapman as council chair by unanimous vote. The meeting then adjourned.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • I maintenance plan available for that.
  • Um, I'm looking especially at subparagraph 2, capital project plan required and certification of plan
  • required and certification project plan required and certification of<00:08:48.640><c> plan.
  • So the use of commissioners of plan.
  • </c><00:09:51.440><c> that</c> information and the same plan that information and the same plan that
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee heard House File 2418 from Representative Tabke, a policy bill focused on requiring local governments seeking state bonding support to show whether they have a capital maintenance or preservation plan for the project. The bill was described as a continuation of work with Chair Lee and others to ensure that when the state invests in local capital projects, the local jurisdiction has a plan to maintain the asset over time rather than returning later for additional state funding. Representative Tabke emphasized that the proposal is not intended to block projects, but to provide information to the capital investment process and encourage responsible long-term planning. Members asked several questions about how the requirement would work in practice, including whether a “no” answer on the maintenance-plan checkbox would disqualify projects, how the rule would apply to small communities, and whether major infrastructure such as wastewater or sewer projects would be exempt. Tabke clarified that the intent is informational and that projects without a maintenance plan should raise concerns, but that the proposal would not apply to major utility projects with separate funding mechanisms. He also explained that the earlier draft had been simplified after input from MMB, and that the adopted DE4 amendment adds the requirement through section 16A.86 for political subdivisions submitting bonding requests. Chair Lee and other members supported the concept as a way to ensure state-funded assets are maintained locally and not repeatedly returned to the state for repairs decades later. One member requested clarifying language to make sure the bill does not apply to water treatment or sewer projects, and Tabke agreed that such language could be added. Tabke said the language had been developed with stakeholders including the League of Minnesota Cities, Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, and small cities, and that they had agreed on the approach. The committee adopted the DE4 amendment and then laid House File 2418 over for possible future consideration.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Transportation Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • came in and said, 'When's my road going to be on the plan?
  • allow us to execute that plan, thank you.
  • I'm here on behalf of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, which is the regional planning agency for
  • But our plan is to pay until we run out of money.
  • I do like that this, ...to stay on top of our maintenance plan.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on Transportation held its first hearing of the session on H. 53, Governor Healey’s Chapter 90 proposal to increase state funding for municipal roads, bridges, sidewalks, and culverts. Committee chairs outlined the hybrid hearing process and invited testimony from municipal officials, labor groups, regional planning organizations, contractors, and administration officials. Across the hearing, speakers consistently supported the bill, emphasizing long-deferred maintenance, inflation in construction costs, climate-related flooding, and the need for more predictable, multi-year funding so cities and towns can plan projects and take advantage of the construction season. The administration described H. 53 as part of a broader $8 billion transportation package, proposing to raise annual Chapter 90 funding from $200 million to $300 million for five years, with the additional $100 million distributed by road mileage to better support rural and small communities. They also highlighted $200 million for culverts and small bridges, plus other transportation investments, and said the five-year authorization would provide certainty for municipal capital planning. Municipal witnesses from places including Carlisle, Beverly, Granby, Hatfield, Newton, Nahant, Gardner, Beckett, and Yarmouth described local road and culvert backlogs, rising asphalt costs, and the difficulty of maintaining infrastructure on limited local budgets. Labor and industry witnesses from the AFL-CIO and MAPA said the bill would support good-paying jobs and provide stability for contractors and producers. The MBTA Advisory Board and regional planning representatives also backed the proposal, noting the connection between local roads and the broader transportation system. Committee members asked questions about the road-mile formula, culvert needs, asphalt costs, and the rationale for a five-year authorization. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the committee adjourned after testimony concluded.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Creating the Educator Group Insurance Program (Part 2) 2/26/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> year depending on the selected plan. year depending on the selected plan.
  • </c> EGP plan would be done through an LMC. EGP plan would be done through an LMC.
  • Um, it would become a multi-employer plan, just a different type of health plan.
  • Um, it would become a multi-employer plan, just a different type of health plan.
  • </c> having a Cadillac plan. having a Cadillac plan.
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Gov. Walz capital investment package 2/19/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • funding for that plan.
  • funding for that plan.
  • </c> funds for the from the governor's plan. funds for the from the governor's plan.
  • And the governor's plan since 2020.
  • governor's plan prioritizes The governor's plan prioritizes investments<00:10:31.360><c> in</c><00:10
Keywords: 1183, house
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

LBT/LAB Joint Info Briefing - Tue Aug 19, 2025 @ 10:00 AM HST

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • plan.
  • The plan has goals outlined in the plan.
  • The plan plan that OCS has put together.
  • The plan is vital.
  • The plan um is vital. It is um Services. The plan um is vital.
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: A joint informational briefing of the House Committee on Labor and the Senate Committee on Labor and Technology was held on August 19, 2025, to hear testimony on the Office of Community Services’ proposed Community Services Block Grant state plan for federal fiscal years 2026 and 2027. Ray Domingo of OCS explained that the plan is intended to maintain federal CSBG funding and focuses on compliance monitoring, coordination among community action agencies and state agencies, and strengthening partnerships. He also reviewed the program structure, noting that Hawaii’s four CAAs serve low-income residents, that the state must pass through at least 90% of the grant to CAAs, and that Hawaii received about $3.8 million in FFY 2025, with allocations to HCAP, Hawaii County Economic Opportunity Council, Kauai Economic Opportunity, and Maui Economic Opportunity. He said statewide CAAs reported serving 40,980 individuals in FFY 2024. Representatives from each CAA testified in support of the plan and described how CSBG functions as flexible “glue” funding that supports overhead, fills gaps, and helps leverage other public and private resources. HCAP’s Robert Piper said the grant helps sustain its broad service network, including Head Start, job training, weatherization, shelter, food assistance, and energy programs, and emphasized its tripartite board structure and annual service to about 20,000 people. Hawaii County’s Chad Hosigal highlighted support for senior farmers market coupons, Meals on Wheels, and transportation services. Kauai Economic Opportunity’s Mabel Fujiuchi said the agency fully supports the plan and described CSBG as nucleus funding that helps support shelter, Meals on Wheels, weatherization, mediation, and other services, including assistance for homeless families and special needs items such as dentures and hearing aids. Maui Economic Opportunity’s Gay Sabonga described CSBG’s role in disaster response after the 2023 wildfires, including shelter transitions, document recovery, housing and utility assistance, bridge grants for small businesses, youth prevention programs, and employment services. Committee members asked about the stability of future federal funding, the frequency of federal assessments, and how satisfaction scores in the state plan were measured. OCS said federal funding information has been mixed and uncertain, that communication with federal partners has been limited and informal, and that the federal assessment website appears outdated; staff said assessments are done every two years. On the satisfaction metric, OCS said the score was 92 out of 100 and believed it reflected participant responses, though they offered to follow up with more detail. No votes or formal actions were taken at the informational briefing.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> talking about uh for the health plan. talking about uh for the health plan.
  • </c> unusual uh compared to some state plans unusual uh compared to some state plans in<00:05:12.479>
  • The plan, um, all of whom are submitting total premiums into the plan trust.
  • And then, further, um, uh, Kentucky Employees Health Plan is a self-funded cafeteria plan where we're
  • We are seeing increased plan.
Summary: The committee met on November 5, 2025, and first approved the minutes after a moment of silence for the UPS airport tragedy. The main presentation was from the Personnel Cabinet on the state health insurance plans and executive branch salary schedule adjustments. Officials said the health plan covers roughly 265,000 active members and up to about 300,000 across all benefit offerings, including school board employees, retirees, and other eligible groups. They described rising claims and expenditures, especially from high-cost claimants and pharmacy spending, and said recent premium and benefit changes were intended to balance costs while preserving recruitment and retention efforts. They also explained that employee premiums had not increased for several years, while employer contributions rose sharply in recent years, and projected a 10% employer increase and 3% employee increase going forward based on actuarial analysis. Committee members asked about deductibles, GLP-1 drug costs, claims validation, and the causes of cost growth; officials said the plan uses multiple payment-integrity vendors and that the increases reflect utilization, drug trends, and high-cost cases rather than a change in coverage. The committee also discussed executive branch salary schedule adjustments. Personnel and budget officials explained that when the legislature approves annual pay increases, the salary schedule is adjusted by the same percentage through executive order so the minimum and midpoint stay aligned with approved compensation levels. They said the 2025 adjustment was a 3% match effective September 16 and that the change was costless because salaries had already been increased. Members raised concerns about salary compression, noting that new hires can sometimes be paid near the level of long-serving employees. Officials said the adjustment helps prevent compression from worsening but does not solve it, and they acknowledged prior RFP efforts to address the issue were unsuccessful because no qualified bidder met the requirements. After the health plan and salary discussions, the committee began a presentation from the Cabinet for Health and Family Services on Kentucky’s senior meal program. Secretary Stack explained that the program is a federal-state-local partnership under the Older Americans Act, with area development districts helping deliver services. He outlined eligibility rules, noting that congregate meals at senior centers are available to people age 60 and older, with a spouse of any age allowed to join, and that home-delivered meals have additional homebound and assistance requirements. Members asked whether there was any means test for congregate meals, and the secretary said there is not; the only threshold is age for the center-based meals, while the home-delivered program has additional criteria.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • So </font> <font color="aaaaaa">strategic plan.
  • They must do a student </font> <font color="aaaaaa">success plan.
  • They must do a student </font> <font color="aaaaaa">success plan.
  • Teaching plan </font> <font color="aaaaaa">goals 90%.
  • Teaching plan </font> <font color="aaaaaa">goals 90%.
Keywords: 999, senate, all
AR
Transcript Highlights:
  • One, if you look at our plan, I'd encourage you. If you've not read our plan, please read it.
  • ’t alter the plan.
  • We were talking a while ago about the plan, and you've referenced the plan several times.
  • So again, I think the plan that has been...
  • So again, I think the plan that has been... ...prepared is our plan. Right.
Summary: The committee first heard extensive public testimony from youth and advocates urging stronger restrictions on vaping. Speakers described vaping as a youth-targeted public health problem, citing flavored products, social media marketing, nicotine addiction, brain development concerns, school disruption, and exposure to harmful aerosol. They recommended prohibiting vaping in public indoor spaces and aligning vape rules with smoke-free laws. Committee members praised the speakers and encouraged them to continue building support for future legislation. The main presentation was on Arkansas’s Rural Health Transformation Program, administered through DFA. Secretary Jim Hudson and program director Brad Andi explained that Arkansas received about $209 million in the first year under the federal program, with potential for roughly $1 billion over five years if performance is strong. They emphasized that the program is meant for long-term rural health transformation, not general operating support, debt relief, or new construction. The state’s plan centers on four initiatives: HEART for prevention and community health, PACT for access and provider collaboration, RISE for workforce development, and THRIVE for technology and telehealth. Officials said applications will be handled through upcoming notices of funding opportunity, with a focus on local, shovel-ready projects, regional collaboration, and transparency. Committee members asked how the program would work for hospitals, clinics, nonprofits, schools, faith groups, and urban providers serving rural patients. Officials said eligibility is broad if applicants can show a connection to rural health, and that targeted renovations, mobile units, school-based clinics, farm-to-school or garden projects, EMS equipment, residency expansion, and behavioral health initiatives may fit if they align with the plan. They stressed that the program cannot fund working capital, routine maintenance, or new buildings, but can support repurposing space and collaborative networks. Members also raised concerns about protecting existing rural providers from being displaced, and officials said applications would be reviewed by a state committee with technical assistance and a reimbursement-based process. The committee then reviewed and took no objection to several DHS and Health Department rules. DHS presented a Medicaid/CHIP rule implementing federal requirements for incarcerated youth, including pre- and post-release coverage, care coordination, targeted case management, and screening services, with no public comments received. The Health Department also presented a licensing rule for audiology and speech pathology that implements recent acts and changes the renewal deadline; that rule was likewise reviewed without objection. The meeting adjourned after no further business.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Municipal and County Government (01/20/2026)

Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:08:53.440><c> uh</c><00:08:53.600><c> what's</c> your plan your um plans for uh what's your plan
  • plans.
  • plans.
  • </c> planning and the use of planning grants. planning and the use of planning grants.
  • She said adding flood resilience planning and the use of planning grants to a municipality's master plan
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Health and Mental Health Feb 5th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Health and Mental Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • So they will cost the plans more.
  • This bill would regulate state plans. That's it—state plans.
  • The way that our plan works, we are fully self-funded. We set up the plan however we want.
  • So when we get any of the copay assistance back to our plan, it goes into the plan for every member.
  • The way that our plan works, we are fully self-funded. We set up the plan however we want.
Keywords: 959, house, all