Transcript Highlights:

• And so I think this thing just really confuses my drive coming in.
• This is basically just drive. We're getting down into a lot of rabbit holes here.
• This is basically just drive and pay attention to what you're doing.
• Just drive. Move over when there's cars behind you. Don't worry about it.
• I thought I'd stand up for the people that do drive slow because that's me.

Transcript Highlights:

• This defeats the purpose of state support, which is intended to drive economic growth and support local
• Texas aviation infrastructure, fostering a safer and more efficient general aviation airport while driving
• This defeats the purpose of state support, which is intended to drive economic growth... and support
• Texas aviation infrastructure, fostering a safer and more efficient general aviation airport while driving
• Today, Texas governments are heavily subsidizing driving.

Bills: HB483 , HB3345 , HB3643 , HB3821 , HB3849 , HB4472 , HB4523 , HB4524 , HB5346 , HB5347 , HB5376

Committee: House S/C on Transportation Funding

Keywords: high-speed rail, Texas Department of Transportation, TxDOT, public-private partnership, comprehensive development agreement, CDA, Interstate 35, I-35 corridor, Dallas, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, intercity passenger rail, rail infrastructure, private entity, transportation infrastructure, rail corridor, passenger rail, infrastructure finance, vehicle registration

Transcript Highlights:

• This is the same number of points assessed for reckless driving and driving over 100 miles an hour.
• Rhonda Campbell with Mothers Against Strong Driving in support.
• Drunk driving is not an accident. It's a choice.
• , and they have to drive to work.
• , and they have to drive to work.

Committee: Senate Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• So, I look, 'If you're going to drive on it, here's a path to drive, but you have to do it with one of
• </c> I'm not an expert on reckless driving I'm not an expert on reckless driving statutes,<01:26:12.920
• </c> supposed to be on it, and you drive supposed to be on it, and you drive anyway,<01:26:50.360><c>
• But most of those were either reckless driving or driving 100 miles an hour or faster.
• </c><01:28:16.520><c> home</c> there's a section in uh, my drive home there's a section in uh, my drive

Bills: HF2354 , HF3621 , HF3429 , HF3483

Committee: House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Keywords: medical assistance, fraud prevention, subpoena authority, criminal penalties, consumer protection, fraud, payment withholding, withheld payments, program integrity, public funds, state agency, program participant, credible allegation of fraud, administrative reconsideration, contested case, chapter 14, data practices, confidential data, protected nonpublic data, anti-fraud

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, members, establishes the distracted driving special plate and distracted driving special plate
• It starts a distracted driving fund to help promote and solve the distracted driving problem.
• The distracted driving plate solves two problems. The distracted driving plate solves two problems.
• Just drive, no distractions, just drive. Okay. So we all hear about distracted driving issues.
• Drive safe. That’s a very clear message. Yeah, okay.

Summary: The committee met to hear and vote on a series of appropriations and transportation-related bills, beginning with SB 1550, which would fund a Queen Creek police pilot program focused on runaway youth prevention, at-risk youth protection, and anti-trafficking work. Supporters said the town and local facilities already contribute personnel and administrative support, while some members urged Queen Creek to add local matching funds. The bill received a due pass recommendation on a 7-2 vote. The committee then considered SB 1156 and SB 1157, both $20 million border-related reimbursement bills sponsored by Senator Rogers. SB 1156 would reimburse cities, towns, and counties for short-term detention hold costs for unauthorized non-citizens, and SB 1157 would reimburse local governments for supplemental fencing or bollard walls in high-crossing border areas. Both bills drew strong opposition from public commenters who described them as funding detention and border enforcement at the expense of other needs, while supporters framed them as backfilling local costs already incurred. SB 1156 passed 5-3, and SB 1157 passed 5-3. The committee also approved SB 1245, which would fund pavement replacement on Rodeo Road in Williams, and SB 1707, which would provide $5 million for AI-related border security at DPS. SB 1245 passed 6-3, with some members objecting that the state highway user revenue fund is underfunded and local contributions should be required. SB 1707 passed 6-4 after testimony split between supporters who favored using AI and surveillance tools for border security and opponents who said the bill was too vague, too expensive, or inappropriate given other state priorities. Later, the committee advanced SB 1273, funding pavement rehabilitation on Ogle Frontage Road between Bowie and San Simon, and SB 1811, which would clarify that school districts and charter schools may allow wireless device use in the case of an emergency rather than during an emergency. SB 1273 passed 6-4 amid debate over state versus local funding responsibility, and SB 1811 passed 8-1 after testimony that the change would give schools more flexibility and avoid practical problems during emergencies. The committee also heard SB 1088, a cybersecurity appropriation for DHS, and SB 1332, which would require ADOT to study light rail expansion in Maricopa County versus autonomous or semi-autonomous transit options. SB 1088 passed 6-4 despite concerns that the appropriation was vendor-driven and not requested by the department. SB 1332 drew extensive testimony from small business owners along Indian School Road who said light rail construction had harmed access and sales, while Phoenix/Valley Metro opposed the bill and questioned ADOT’s role; the discussion continued as the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• recklessly are not driving their own vehicle.
• We did not launch the Drive Right, Save Lives campaign to punish anyone.
• When I was 19, I lost two friends to a reckless driving incident on June 19, 2003.
• I mean, this reckless driving does not look at race, the color of your skin.
• I mean, this reckless driving does not look at race, the color of your skin.

Committee: House Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• that actually is driving, you know, the cause.
• We also know that Canada has stronger impaired driving laws than the United States.
• this year looked at factors underlying that rise in impaired driving fatalities.
• And we know that when speed limits go up, people tend to drive faster.
• Like the purpose of the trip is not in question for driving.

Committee: Senate Transportation

Summary: The committee began with a transportation budget and revenue overview from Haley Gamble and Brian Moore. They reviewed the 2025-27 adopted transportation budget, noting $15.5 billion in expenditures, with the Department of Transportation making up the largest share. They said the 2025 session’s new revenues, including the fuel tax increase and other fee changes, allowed the committee to move from projected structural deficits to a balanced four-year plan, while preserving major programs such as culverts, ferry timing adjustments, highway preservation, and local maintenance funding. They also discussed updated revenue forecasts, including a modest downward revision in fuel consumption and uncertainty around some revenue sources, but said overall revenues remain stronger than previously projected. Committee members asked for more detail on dedicated funds, regional fuel tax patterns, and whether preservation needs could be supported through bonding. The committee then heard a remote presentation from Dr. Jessica Chichino of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety on traffic safety trends and countermeasures. She described the group’s “30 by 30” goal to reduce traffic fatalities 30% by 2030, citing increases in deaths for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists, and comparing U.S. fatality rates unfavorably with other high-income countries. Her presentation emphasized speed management, impaired driving enforcement, safer roadway design, and pedestrian protections such as lower speed limits, speed cameras, traffic calming, roundabouts, better lighting, and pedestrian beacons. She also highlighted research showing that larger vehicles increase pedestrian risk and discussed Bellevue pilot projects using smart signal technology that reduced near misses. No action was taken on the presentation. In the final work session item, Barb Chamberlain of WSDOT and Justin Leighton of the Washington State Transit Association discussed potential transit and active transportation grant programs that had been proposed but not enacted in 2025. Chamberlain explained how new grant programs require runway time, staff capacity, and clear program design, and contrasted “projects first, funding after” with “funding first, projects after” approaches. She addressed the proposed Senior Transportation Emphasis Program and regional trails/cycle highways concepts, noting questions about eligibility, scoring, and how such projects would fit with existing active transportation and preservation work. Leighton reviewed the state’s transit grant portfolio and argued that a transit safety and security grant could help agencies fund operator barriers, lighting, shelters, behavioral health support, and non-uniformed security staff. He also raised concerns about sales tax treatment of security contracts, staffing shortages, federal uncertainty, CDL non-domicile issues, and long procurement timelines for buses. The committee asked questions about definitions, program purpose, and implementation challenges, but did not take any votes or formal action.

Transcript Highlights:

• Certainly, people who choose to drive for Uber and Lyft also can't access that.
• Lyft aims to ensure every self-driving car is seamlessly integrated and Lyft-ready.
• And about 82% drive less than 20 hours a week.
• So that flexibility and that ability... ...about 82% drive less than 20 hours a week.
• You're not, like, it's not my own car that I'm driving and I'm driving my friends or family, right?

Summary: The hearing focused on transportation network companies in California, with the chair framing it as an informational hearing on the history, regulation, safety, climate, accessibility, and data issues surrounding Uber, Lyft, and smaller or autonomous TNC services. The CPUC described its decade-long regulatory role, including safety rules, background checks, insurance requirements, reporting obligations, and two major legislative programs from 2018: the Clean Miles Standard and the Access for All program. Members asked about complaint trends, data collection and disclosure, program implementation, and how the CPUC uses annual reports for policymaking, compliance, and program oversight. Uber and Lyft said the statewide framework has supported growth while providing safety and access benefits, but both companies emphasized that insurance is a major cost driver and argued that California’s UM/UIM requirement is unusually high compared with other vehicles. They said the Clean Miles Standard is pushing electrification but faces headwinds from EV affordability and charging infrastructure, while Access for All has expanded wheelchair-accessible service but still needs continued support. They also discussed transit partnerships, wildfire response, and the potential role of autonomous vehicles, with both companies saying human drivers will remain important and that future regulation should account for new technology. The final panel, including the San Francisco County Transportation Authority and UC Berkeley researchers, presented evidence that TNCs have increased congestion and reduced transit ridership, especially in dense urban areas. They described prior research showing TNCs contributed to congestion growth in San Francisco and noted that this work helped spur local taxes on ride-hailing trips to fund safety and transit improvements. The panel also discussed the CPUC’s evolving data-disclosure decisions, arguing that public access to TNC trip data is important for understanding transportation impacts and informing local policy.

Transcript Highlights:

• Louis Park plead drunk driving in St.
• </c> into the safe driving into the safe driving category.<00:19:56.640><c> Um</c><00:19:57.360><c> it
• </c> experience uh drinking and driving. experience uh drinking and driving.
• </c> they're not supposed to drink and drive. they're not supposed to drink and drive. they're<00:30:
• </c><00:32:44.080><c> If</c> driving without valid license. If driving without valid license.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:19:34.720><c> The</c><00:19:34.800><c> good</c> YWCA Dress for Success drive.
• The good YWCA Dress for Success drive.
• to raise awareness on drunk driving, underage drinking, and alcohol abuse.
• ><c> driving,</c><00:22:05.000><c> underage</c><00:22:05.480><c> drinking,</c><00:22:06.080><c> and</
• c> on drunk driving, underage drinking, and on drunk driving, underage drinking, and alcohol<00:22:06.840

Bills: SCR48 , SCR28 , SCR74 , SCR62 , SCR60 , SCR89 , SCR147 , SCR179 , SCR182 , SCR59 , SCR54 , SCR180

Transcript Highlights:

• I also see semi-trucks in the left lane driving normally.
• You can drive it from Vegas to kind of Phoenix, and then it turns you around and drives you back.
• You can drive it from Vegas to kind of Phoenix, and then it turns you around and drives you back.
• I drive up to Kingman and drive down from Kingman every two weeks.
• So I drive to Sedona. I drive through these areas.

Bills: HB2067 , HB2068 , HB2127 , HB2164 , HB2200 , HB2201 , HB2242 , HB2283 , HB2284 , HB2285 , HB2286 , HB2287 , HB2304 , HB2306 , HB2399 , HB2601 , HB2609 , HB2760 , HB2761 , HB2859 , HB2887 , HB2892 , HB2893 , HB2894 , HB2978 , HB4027 , HCM2012 , HCM2016

Committee: House Transportation & Infrastructure

Keywords: appropriation, transportation, infrastructure, Apache Junction, funding, Show Low, road extension, special license plates, nonprofits, charitable contributions, Reay Lane, Graham County, HB 2200, State Route 89, SR 89, Chino Valley, Arizona Department of Transportation, ADOT, road widening, highway expansion

Transcript Highlights:

• So, you know, it's something that I dream about: to be able to drive and charge some way, someday.
• Those really can help drive us forward.
• One recommendation was to continue driving private investment.
• An estimated 17% of county employees who drive to work at our regulated work sites are already driving
• For the drivers, it's a better driving experience. It's a cleaner truck, a safer truck.

Summary: The joint informational hearing of the Select Committee on Electric Vehicles and Charging Infrastructure focused on California’s EV market, charging infrastructure, and the effects of recent federal actions. The chair opened by emphasizing California’s progress on EV adoption and charging reliability, but also noted ongoing challenges with affordability, access, interoperability, heavy-duty electrification, and federal headwinds. She highlighted interest in technologies such as inductive charging and thanked host organizations and staff before moving to the first panel. State agency witnesses from Go-Biz, CARB, and the California Energy Commission described current programs and priorities. Go-Biz outlined its role in coordinating agencies, supporting permitting, and advancing the state’s ZEV market development strategy and equity action plan. CARB discussed federal attacks on its clean vehicle regulations, litigation to defend waiver authority, and the importance of incentives and regulatory programs such as Advanced Clean Trucks, Advanced Clean Fleets, Clean Truck Check, HVIP, and Clean Cars for All. The CEC detailed its funding and regulatory work on charging and fueling infrastructure, charger reliability, payment methods, roaming, and statewide planning, while stressing the need for more charging in multifamily housing and more public DC fast charging. All three agencies said federal rollbacks and permitting delays are major obstacles, but that California remains committed to expanding ZEV adoption. The second panel featured advocates, local government, utility, and research perspectives. CalETC urged continuous state funding through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and emphasized the low-carbon fuel standard, multifamily charging, and managed charging. An EV advocacy group proposed a conquest-style state incentive for new and used EV buyers and argued that multifamily housing is a major untapped market, while also favoring Level 2 charging over Level 1 for most home and apartment settings. Los Angeles County and LADWP described large-scale local deployment of chargers, fleet electrification, workforce training, and the need for sustained funding, agency coordination, and streamlined permitting and grid interconnection. UCS recommended prioritizing replacement of older high-emitting vehicles, using fuel policy revenues to support cleaner cars, and expanding bidirectional charging. The chair closed by asking for more discussion on Level 1 versus Level 2 charging and noted the importance of education, affordability, and practical deployment strategies.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> Hampshire people who drink and drive Hampshire people who drink and drive actually<01:13:16.640>
• </c> are in a private vehicle and not driving are in a private vehicle and not driving a<01:18:08.239
• <01:18:14.480><c> while</c><01:18:14.800><c> intoxicated,</c> driving while intoxicated, driving while
• If somebody who is driving a CDL vehicle or driving their passenger vehicle and they happen to be a CDL
• </c><01:46:55.520><c> uh</c> AAA has made uh impaired driving uh AAA has made uh impaired driving uh

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• We drive one-ton trucks.
• And when that happens, there's more supply, which will, I believe, drive prices down.
• Distracted driving, fatigued driving, speeding, and following too closely are significant issues we face
• I believe it'll help drive down the cost of insurance. That's a no. Thank you.
• I drive myself.

Bills: HB4806

Committee: House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Keywords: civil action, damages, health care services, noneconomic damages, negligence, legal standards

Transcript Highlights:

• They drive down that road that you and I walked, and they drive all the way down to Lookin.
• So we don't know why it continued to drive in this level of water, but we do know that he Drive in this
• And at 2:37, he drives them, drives them. Did I hear you say that correctly? That's correct.
• And at 237, he drives them, drives them. Did I? It's four inches.
• And at 237, he drives them, drives them. Did I hear you? Say that correct? That's correct.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is the same number of points assessed for reckless driving and driving over 100 miles an hour.
• Rhonda Campbell with Mothers Against Drunk Driving in support.
• Drunk driving is not an accident. It's a choice.
• , and they have to drive to work.
• This junk driving crap needs to be reeled in, and we're not doing it.

Summary: The committee began without a quorum and heard several bills in subcommittee format. AB 1546, which would increase penalties for repeat DUI offenders by allowing a third DUI within 10 years to be charged as a wobbler, requiring a fifth DUI to be a felony, and lengthening ignition interlock and license revocation periods, drew strong support from law enforcement and district attorney groups and opposition from public defenders and reform advocates who argued the bill would further criminalize substance use and mental health issues. No vote was taken because there was no quorum at the time. AB 1595, aimed at standardizing post-conviction procedures for wrongful conviction claims and clarifying courts’ authority to consider new evidence, was supported by innocence and public defender organizations and opposed by district attorneys, who said existing habeas law is already clear and that the bill would add complexity and burden courts. AB 292, which would impose mandatory jail time for repeat felony domestic violence offenders within seven years, was supported by sheriffs, prosecutors, probation officers, and local governments, but opposed by domestic violence survivor advocates and public defender groups who warned it would not deter abuse and could criminalize survivors and divert resources from services. AB 1816, allowing courts to extend probation up to one additional year for sex offenders who have not completed required treatment, drew support from probation and law enforcement groups and opposition from public defenders and civil liberties advocates concerned about longer supervision, technical violations, and barriers such as poverty and treatment access; the committee later took a roll call and passed the bill 3-1, with one member not voting, sending it to Appropriations. After quorum was established, the committee also passed AB 1627, which would bar people with misconduct in immigration enforcement from becoming California peace officers, and AB 1927, which would create a misdemeanor for falsely impersonating a bail agent to solicit bail, both on due pass motions to Judiciary/Appropriations as amended. AB 1854, a shield-law measure expanding protections for reproductive and gender-affirming health care providers, patients, and related businesses from out-of-state legal process, was supported by the Attorney General’s office and reproductive rights groups and opposed by anti-abortion and family policy organizations; it was moved on a due pass motion to Judiciary. The committee then heard AB 1872, which would make repeat adult swatting offenses a felony/wobbler and require restitution for property damage, with support from law enforcement, prosecutors, and civil liberties advocates and opposition from public defenders and justice reform groups who argued the bill would not deter conduct and could disproportionately affect people with mental illness or undocumented status. A motion to advance AB 1872 was made, but the transcript cuts off before any final vote on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• down the road in Alabama and driving down the road in Alabama and driving down the road in Alabama and
• the vehicle you can't vehicle and drive the vehicle you can't vehicle and drive the vehicle you can't
• criminals somebody could just be driving criminals somebody could just be driving through the state
• through I may not know just driving through I may not know just driving through I may not know about
• whatever uh you won't be able to drive whatever uh you won't be able to drive through Alabama I will

Bills: SB82 , SB78 , SB4 , SB6 , SB62 , SB66 , SB77 , SB63 , SB79 , SB53 , SB55 , HB14

Committee: Senate County and Municipal Government

Keywords: SB82, warrant recall, outstanding warrants, stale warrants, misdemeanor warrants, Class B misdemeanor, Class C misdemeanor, municipal magistrate, circuit court clerk, criminal procedure, court administration, docket cleanup, warrant audit, law enforcement notification, domestic violence, sex offense, weapons offense, deadly weapon, dangerous instrument, felony-related charges

Transcript Highlights:

• But what we're trying to do with Bentley and Mason's Law is this: You can't drive drunk or be under the
• of that, though, is if you know anything about Missouri, we have a huge amount of people who are driving
• We have a huge amount of people who are driving uninsured or very much underinsured at this point.
• The figures I saw last were just alarmingly high of the people who are driving under that circumstance
• She was driving home from a get-together. Seat belt, speed limit, no alcohol, just innocent.

Committee: House Children and Families

Transcript Highlights:

• But what we're trying to do with Bentley and Mason's Law is this: you can't drive drunk or be under the
• of that, though, is if you know anything about Missouri, we have a huge amount of people who are driving
• We have a huge amount of people who are driving uninsured or very much underinsured at this point.
• The figures I saw last were just alarmingly high for the people who are driving under that circumstance
• My name is Heather Elder, and I’m a Victim Services Specialist with Mothers Against Drunk Driving in

Committee: House Children and Families

Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 1135, “Bentley and Mason’s Law,” which would require a person convicted of driving drunk or otherwise impaired and causing the death of a parent or parents to pay child support-like maintenance to the victim’s children until age 18, or 21 if in college. The sponsor explained that the amount would be determined through a clerk and court process similar to child support, based on the offender’s finances and the children’s prior standard of living. The bill also includes a provision intended to avoid “double dipping” by barring the maintenance claim if the family has already pursued a civil case against the insurance company, and it allows a one-year grace period after release from prison before payments begin. Committee members asked about the amount, whether health care or FAFSA would be affected, and whether penalties would apply for nonpayment; the sponsor said those issues were not fully specified and could be strengthened later. Members also raised concerns about enforceability and bankruptcy, while others supported the bill but suggested possible amendments. Public testimony was strongly in favor. Brooke Stewart described how her husband was killed by a drunk driver in Tennessee and said Bentley’s Law has provided her children with restitution that will help support them through adulthood, including college. She said the offender had prior DUI-related arrests and that the law gave her family relief and accountability. Heather Elder of Mothers Against Drunk Driving testified for the bill and said Missouri should pass it without amendment, noting that similar laws exist in other states and territories. She said the bill was created in response to Cecilia Williams’ family tragedy and that Bentley and Mason, the children named in the bill, have been attending hearings and understand what the legislation means. Witnesses also referenced related impaired-driving and social-host bills as broader prevention efforts. No one testified in opposition, and the committee took no vote, ending the hearing after the public testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• The school bus driver, an employee of Pasco County School Board, failed to drive safely, leading to the
• Senators, this amendment enhances penalties related to the Florida ban on texting while driving law.
• The amendment changes texting while driving from a non-moving violation to a moving violation, including
• Senators, this amendment enhances penalties related to the Florida ban on texting while driving law.
• Going to very soon have a young man driving or with a learner's license, and anything that helps keep

Summary: The Senate opened with a prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, doctor and gallery introductions, and several recognitions, including USF Day at the Capitol and visitors from Miami Gardens, Teach For America Florida, and Pathways to Prosperity. The chamber then moved to the special order calendar and considered a series of bills, with several measures temporarily postponed and others passed after debate and roll call votes. The Senate unanimously passed several Open Government Sunset Review bills, including SB 7010 and SB 7008, which preserve public records exemptions related to insolvent insurance company receiverships and financial technology sandbox applications. It also passed SB 1430 on post-judgment execution proceedings for terrorism victims, SB 910 on veterans benefits assistance, SB 796 on general permits for distributed wastewater treatment systems, SB 28 and SB 22 as claims bills involving South Broward Hospital District, SB 8 for relief related to a Pasco County School Board accident, SB 1718 preserving a public records exemption for minors seeking abortions without parental consent, and SB 994 on driver’s license education requirements. SB 832 on former phosphate mining lands also passed, but with two amendments and some opposition. A major portion of the meeting focused on SB 700, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services bill, which included technical updates, restrictions on certain additives in public water systems, limits on ESG practices in farm lending, drone-related penalties, truth-in-labeling provisions for meat, milk, poultry, and eggs, charity registration requirements, agricultural worker housing, and support for FFA and 4-H. The most contentious debate centered on fluoride provisions in the bill: multiple amendments by Senators Berman and Polsky to remove the fluoride language, require targeted fluoride assistance, or order an OPAGA study were all defeated, while a technical amendment by Senator Truenow was adopted. The bill remained on the calendar for third reading after extensive debate and questioning. At the end of the session, the Senate adopted motions to certify passed bills to the House, retain postponed bills on the special order calendar, and return CS for SB 7016 to second reading, then adjourned until April 16.