Video & Transcript : 'prompt pay' :
Page 307 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- So, you still have to register and you still pay the fee.
- Actually, they still pay that fee.
- OK, so it says in the bill you still have to register and you still have to pay the, and you still pay
- They just pay it.
- It could be that or just people not paying attention right now with our technology.
Bills:
HB 767, HB 1242, HB 1373, HB 1404, HB 1708, HB 1936, HB 2041, HB 2198, HB 2270, HB 2315, HB 2415, HB 2427, HB 2455, HB 2457, HB 2522, HB 2523, HB 2686, HB 2763, HB 2775, HB 2944, HB 3034, HB 1683, HB 1695
Keywords:
highway designation, memorial, Montgomery County, Paul P. Mendes, transportation, HB 1242, Texas Transportation Code, U.S. Highway 281, Brooks County, Ernesto Soliz Cantu, memorial highway, road naming, TxDOT, road signage, commemorative resolution, memorial markers, county road 304, Huppergate Road, Los Robles Trail, Farm-to-Market Road
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, some interpretations are, even if they pay you, you know, even if they leave you with very little
- So if you closed your doors and, uh, and they might pay you for so many years, so that's what that bill
- did was they allowed the payment schedule, the actual amortization of the value, uh, where they can pay
- Yes, there is that possibility, and we always have to pay for, we've always had to pay fair market value
- I mean they have to pay for it if they wanted to do that, right, and they have to pay them what, what
Bills:
HB24
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> know it sounds like a lot to have to pay know it sounds like a lot to have to pay out<02:56:31.560
- The tourism industry, which everybody has question about, right, they pay payroll. They pay G.
- They pay payroll. They pay G.
- Cruise ships do pay some in the docking fees, but they could pay more. Thank you so much.
- </c><03:45:36.279><c> both</c> to re-evaluate who pays both to re-evaluate who pays both metaphorically
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (03/03/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- And so you are still going to pay because the local EFA is not going to pay all of that tuition, right
- </c><00:32:43.720><c> for</c><00:32:43.919><c> it</c> choice you pay for it choice you pay for it correct
- because the local EFA is not going pay because the local EFA is not going to<00:33:11.200><c> pay</c
- I know what I'm paying for. But the school voucher money? Yeah, I do not know what I'm paying for.
- </c> expense the towns will have to to pay expense the towns will have to to pay because<01:21:50.120
Summary:
The Education Policy Committee opened a hearing on HB 748, which would establish a local education freedom account (EFA) program. The prime sponsor, Rep. Kevin Verville, described the bill as enabling legislation that would let local voters decide whether to create a local EFA program by petition and ballot vote, with a 60% threshold to approve or repeal it. He argued that public education is about funding rather than a specific school building, said the proposal would expand parental choice, and cited Deerfield’s move from a single high school option to multiple tuitioned options as an example of local flexibility.
Verville said the local EFA would be funded at twice the state adequacy amount, with the district matching the state portion, while other aid categories such as free and reduced meals, English language learner, and special education aid would not be doubled. He said students using a local EFA would still count in average daily membership, that unspent EFA funds would revert to the district, and that the bill would prohibit double-dipping with other scholarship or EFA programs. He also said special education services would remain under district discretion and that local EFA participants would still take statewide assessments for accountability.
Committee members pressed him on several issues, especially special education, transportation, and fairness. Rep. Woodcock and Rep. Murray asked whether districts would still have to provide special education and transportation services if a student used a local EFA; Verville responded that special education would remain in the local district at district discretion, while transportation would generally become the family’s responsibility unless already required in an IEP. Rep. Cornell raised an equity concern about no income eligibility cap, asking whether higher-income families should receive the same public support; Verville replied that New Hampshire does not means-test public education and that the local EFA is a public funding mechanism, not a tuition subsidy that would cover full private-school costs. No vote or committee action was taken in the portion provided.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Elder Affairs Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am
Transcript Highlights:
- Our association gets at least two inquiries a week from people looking to open a private-pay home care
- a standard to require proper training for employees, have liability insurance, guaranteed overtime pay
- a standard to require proper training for employees, have liability insurance, guaranteed overtime pay
- In terms of purely private pay home care agencies, again, we have no idea.
- It shouldn't matter what the payer is, whether it's private pay or Medicaid or Medicare; the consumer
Summary:
The Joint Committee on Aging and Independence held a hearing on several bills, led by Chair Tom Stanley and Senate Chair Patricia Jehlen. The committee first heard testimony on H. 765/S. 487, an act relative to councils on aging, which would update outdated statutory language and allow directors of councils on aging to make staffing decisions when a council is structured as an advisory body. Representative Donahue and Betsy Connell of the Massachusetts Association of Councils on Aging said the change reflects how most councils now operate and would resolve conflicts like the one that arose in Sherborn. Members asked about whether the bill would affect town managers, volunteer roles, and whether the language should more clearly exempt informal volunteer help; supporters said the bill is aimed at municipal staffing structures, not unpaid volunteer assistance.
The committee then took extensive testimony on H. 789/S. 470, an act to improve Massachusetts home care, which would create a statewide licensure system for non-medical home care agencies and entities. Julie Watt, Jay Krillovich, Betsy Krimmins, Lisa Gargoni, Tim Foley, and several providers and advocates supported the bill, arguing that licensure would establish baseline standards for background checks, training, service plans, insurance, complaint procedures, and labor-law compliance, while helping consumers identify legitimate providers and reducing fraud and abuse. Several witnesses described problems with unlicensed or poorly supervised providers, and family members and dementia advocates emphasized the need for dementia-specific training and better oversight for vulnerable clients. Tim Foley also raised concerns about private equity’s growing role in home care and said stronger regulation is needed to protect consumers and workers.
Committee members focused on practical questions about the bill’s scope, including whether it would reach informal paid helpers, volunteers, or people doing occasional household tasks, and what agency would enforce the rules. Supporters said the bill is intended to cover entities advertising home care services, not unpaid volunteer help, though they acknowledged regulators would need to work out details. John Sneeth of Tribute Home Care offered a more cautious view, saying licensure should not unduly burden smaller providers or reduce competition, and that enforcement would be key. The hearing also included testimony from the Alzheimer’s Association and family caregivers, who strongly supported the bill’s dementia-training provisions and described how trained caregivers improved safety and quality of life for people living with Alzheimer’s and dementia. At the end of the hearing, the committee also heard support for H. 778/S. 473, regarding the Commission on LGBTQ Aging, with Lisa Krinsky urging funding for a full-time director and continued support for the commission’s strategic plan. After public testimony concluded, the committee adjourned the hearing by motion and voice vote.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- The maximum Cal Grant B Access Award that helps students pay for non-tuition college essentials such
- for college. ...which unfortunately includes me borrowing loans that I had to take out to pay for my
- opportunities that could further my career and my academics because I may not have enough money to pay
- myself, at the Gardens, Carlos Park, and at Sac State, I see the effects of students struggling to pay
- ... ...on their board and prevents a company from paying a UC official, a UC executive, to serve the
Summary:
The Senate Education Committee heard several bills focused on school nutrition, campus safety, college affordability, and UC contracting ethics. SB 1058 by Senator McNerney would remove price as the primary factor in school nutrition procurement, allowing districts more flexibility to prioritize meal quality, cultural appropriateness, local sourcing, and sustainability. Support came from school nutrition officials, education agencies, and school business groups; there was no opposition. Members raised questions about vendor selection and safeguards against favoritism, and the bill was ultimately moved forward on a due pass motion.
SB 1140 by Senator Ashby, sponsored by the California Federation of Teachers, would require school safety plans to address access control during construction, maintenance, and repair projects by limiting unattended entry points such as open doors and gates. Supporters included Brady Campaign, Moms Demand Action, school employees, labor groups, and Prism. Members discussed how the bill would apply to both new construction and ongoing maintenance, and the measure advanced on a due pass motion. SB 959 was taken up on consent and also moved forward.
SB 1006 by Senator Padilla would raise the Cal Grant B Access Award to a new minimum and tie future increases to inflation, with related supplemental awards for student parents and former foster youth also indexed. Support came from higher education advocates, CSU, student groups, and public advocacy organizations, with testimony from a Sac State student describing housing, transportation, and food insecurity. Members generally supported the bill, though questions were raised about fiscal impact; the author estimated about $21 million in first-year costs. The bill passed the committee on a due pass motion.
SB 1141 by Senator Wahab would bar businesses from contracting with the University of California if a UC executive is paid by, or has been paid by, that business within the prior year, aiming to address conflicts of interest in UC contracting. AFSCME and UC workers supported the bill, citing examples of executives serving on corporate boards while their institutions contract with those companies. UC and business groups opposed it, arguing it was overly broad, could capture ordinary dividends or unpaid advisory roles, and could disrupt essential contracts and operations. After extensive debate over existing conflict-of-interest laws and whether the bill would create practical problems, the committee approved SB 1141 on a 4-3 vote and then reported the remaining bills out 7-0 as calls were lifted, concluding the agenda.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Education Committee Mar 25th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- opportunities that could further my career and my academics because I may not have enough money to pay
- myself, at the Gardens, Carlos Park, and at Sac State, I see the effects of students struggling to pay
- myself, at the Gardens, Carlos Park, and at Sac State, I see the effects of students struggling to pay
- ... ...on their board and prevents a company from paying a UC official, a UC executive, to serve the
- Not only have they been caught up in a pay-to-play scheme, their spouse or their partner or something
Summary:
The Senate Education Committee heard several bills related to school nutrition, campus safety, college financial aid, and UC contracting ethics. SB 1058 by Senator McNerney would remove price as the primary factor in school nutrition procurement grants, allowing districts more flexibility to prioritize quality, local sourcing, cultural responsiveness, and healthier meals. Supporters from school nutrition and education groups said it would help districts better serve students and local farmers without increasing state costs. After questions about vendor selection and safeguards against favoritism, the bill was moved do pass and later approved 7-0.
SB 1140 by Senator Ashby, sponsored by the California Federation of Teachers, would require school safety plans to address access control during construction, maintenance, and repair projects. Supporters said the bill closes a gap that can leave gates or doors unsecured and could help prevent unauthorized access to campuses. There was no opposition, and the committee approved the bill unanimously. SB 959 was also taken up on consent and passed.
SB 1006 by Senator Padilla would raise the Cal Grant B Access Award and tie future increases to inflation using the California Consumer Price Index. Supporters said the current award has lost most of its value and does not cover basic needs like housing, food, transportation, and books, affecting hundreds of thousands of students. Members discussed the fiscal impact and the need to keep aid aligned with rising costs; the bill was moved forward and later approved 7-0. SB 1141 by Senator Wahab would bar UC contracts with businesses that pay UC executives or where executives serve in paid roles, aiming to prevent conflicts of interest. UC and the Chamber of Commerce opposed the bill as too broad and potentially disruptive to operations, while supporters argued existing rules are insufficient because many contracting decisions happen outside public view. After extended debate over recusal, transparency, and the scope of the restrictions, the committee passed the bill 4-2 and then finalized all bills on the agenda before adjourning.
AR
Arkansas 2026 Regular Session
LEGISLATIVE JOINT AUDITING-COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES Mar 12th, 2026
LEGISLATIVE JOINT AUDITING-COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES
Transcript Highlights:
- The city utilizes solid waste funds to pay monthly dumpster rental fees on behalf of five private businesses
- Yes, we are in the process of doing the projects that loan is going to be paying on.
- How do you feel about paying for that water? I understand. I understand totally.
- I submit a pay request when the contractor submits a pay request. They send me the money.
- So, again, And you can't get the water there if you ain't got somebody to pay for it.
Summary:
The committee approved the February 12 minutes and received updates on delinquent municipal water and sewer reports for 2022 and 2023, noting continued progress toward compliance and reinstatement of turnback funds for several cities. It also deferred several matters to the June 4 meeting, including Fargo’s municipal accounting noncompliance report, Jericho’s street-fund misuse issue, Biggers and Holly Grove deferred reports, and a group of private water and sewer reports lacking proper responses.
Members then heard and filed a detailed report on the City of Strong, which involved repeat findings on undeposited receipts, improper use of solid waste funds, unsupported spending, late payroll tax payments, accounting control problems, and fund balance issues. Mayor Darrell Howell described corrective steps, including new internal controls, outside CPA assistance, repayment of misapplied funds, budget amendments, and efforts to address the findings; the committee commended the city’s efforts and filed the report. The committee also filed reports on Thornton Waterworks, Calhoun County, Salem, Briarcliffe, Compton Water Association, Montgomery County Regional Public Water Authority, Camden, Johnson County, and Sparkman, while deferring several private water reports and other unresolved items.
A major portion of the meeting focused on the Pulaski County Regional Solid Waste Management District and other regional solid waste districts. The audit found issues in Pulaski County involving unapproved payroll items, missing credit card documentation, unapproved contracts, vehicle and cell phone documentation problems, lack of competitive bidding, and weak internal controls; members questioned the district’s practices and deferred the report to June while requesting district representatives appear. The committee also reviewed a statewide report on six regional solid waste management districts, with findings in Pulaski, Faulkner, and Benton counties and no findings in three others; that report was likewise deferred for Pulaski County questions. The meeting ended after a lengthy discussion with Cross County Rural Water System about overdue audit posting, water quality problems, grant-funded improvements, board notice practices, and the broader challenges facing rural water systems, after which the committee filed the report and adjourned.
MO
Transcript Highlights:
- And I think that's the real point here: who pays for this at the end? Taxpayers.
- And I think that's the real point here: who pays for this at the end is the taxpayers.
- This is how much we're paying for public safety. What are areas around us paying for public safety?
- And they also changed our pay structure and the pay scale with that as well in July.
- We realize they don't have the money to pay like at Wentzville or St.
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
Government Efficiency Feb 12th, 2026 at 08:00 am
Government Efficiency
Transcript Highlights:
- Do you know who's paying for that? No. Would you be surprised if I told you it was the airport?
- Louis County and City pay. Don't get me wrong, I love the zoo. I'm glad it's there.
- You know, I'm certainly paying a water bill or a sewer bill or something like that.
- So the answer is, is why the state, why the region has an interest is because the people paying those
- What taxes are we paying that are covered under this?
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Higher Education & Workforce Development Jan 29th, 2026 at 01:30 pm
Higher Education & Workforce Development
Transcript Highlights:
- And that became a conversation about whether the business community was willing to tax itself to pay
- one of the things that, you know, the sort of agreement at that time was this is a dedicated fund to pay
- It would consist of the taxpayers who are paying into this fund.
- And that is something that I just ask you all to pay attention to.
- Like they're not going to pay for light bills for the legislative building.
Keywords:
medical school, medical education, letter grades, grading system, pass/fail, tiered grading, student assessment, curriculum, University of Washington, Washington State University, School of Medicine, physician training, academic standards, coursework evaluation, RCW 28B, SB 6259, Washington, state financial aid, higher education, public college
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Health Care & Wellness Jan 21st, 2026 at 01:30 pm
Health Care & Wellness
Transcript Highlights:
- It ensures insurers are delivering what people believe they're paying for: health care.
- People pay their health insurance premiums so that their insurer will pay for their medical bills when
- People pay their health insurance premiums so that their insurer will pay for their medical bills when
- I pay $1,600 a month for my family of four, and we still have an $8,000 deductible.
- , i.e., a bigger percentage of my premium goes to pay for the health care services that I need.
Keywords:
healthcare, transparency, patient communication, credentials, professional standards, medical loss ratio, insurance, health plans, cost management, nursing delegation, registered nurse, RN, home care aide, nursing assistant, certified nursing assistant, CNA, medical assistant, home health, hospice, community-based care
FL
Florida 2026 4th Special Session
January 14, 2026 - 08:00 AM
Transcript Highlights:
- What the state pay you guys to do this analysis.
- But I want to your question, how much money are we going to be having to pay? I connect.
- your peak card purchases to pay your rent on your district offices.
- So in your previous presentation from APD they pay and we we will to also we pay the vendor to maintain
- And and we're paying more because the vendor wasn't ready, correct.
VT
Transcript Highlights:
- Year after year, we pay more to provide less.
- It<00:21:53.360><c> also</c><00:21:53.679><c> means</c><00:21:54.320><c> paying</c><00:21:54.640><c>
- attention</c><00:21:55.120><c> to</c> It also means paying attention to It also means paying attention
- lowest-paying supervisory union.
- For teachers, it means equitable pay, professional development, and more time to teach.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Indian Affairs Nov 14th, 2025
House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- We need to definitely pay attention to those and see how we can increase the funding.
- And in some cases, a funding agent may say that we don't pay for indirect costs.
- So we can't back pay the contractor.
- ,' because the rules say that the state rules are we don't pay.
- We only pay prospectively. Pay. We only pay fully, prospectively.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- But another reason I support this bill is because it's not a good use of public funds to pay for abortions
- Uh, to stop cities from paying for abortions directly.
- This bill focuses on cities giving grants to organizations paying for this.
- Right now, Austin and San Antonio combined have allocated $500,000 to pay for flights, hotels, meals,
- And because this group doesn't pay for the abortion or provide the abortion.
Keywords:
electric power, interconnection, utilities, ERCOT, large load customers, water supply, sewer service, demand management, school prayer, Bible reading, religious text, public schools, Texas Education Code, student prayer, silent prayer, meditation, religious liberty, First Amendment, Establishment Clause, church and state
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- to be a loophole in our law, and they've allocated taxpayer dollars to non-profits specifically to pay
- But another reason I support this bill is because it's not a good use of public funds to pay for abortions
- This bill focuses on cities giving grants to organizations paying for this, and so that... what you're
- More shockingly, the cities of Austin and San Antonio have decided to use their taxpayer funds to pay
- Right now, Austin and San Antonio combined have allocated $500,000 to pay for flights, hotels, meals,
Keywords:
electric power, interconnection, utilities, ERCOT, large load customers, water supply, sewer service, demand management, school prayer, Bible reading, religious text, public schools, Texas Education Code, student prayer, silent prayer, meditation, religious liberty, First Amendment, Establishment Clause, church and state
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- To use that money to pay staff for the overtime they would dedicate to an application, yeah.
- It's just about paying people over time. I think that would make a big difference.
- certainly if staff can pay dollars instead of comp time for work.
- Then on top of that, you got to pay a what's called a franchise fee.
- Someone is paying for it. at franchise tax, that what a franchise tax does is it's.
Keywords:
solid waste management, exclusive contracts, public agency, contract amendment, notification requirements, Texas Health and Safety Code, Texas Emissions Reduction Plan, TERP, air quality, emissions reduction, clean fleet, alternative fuel, natural gas vehicles, hydrogen fuel, hydrogen infrastructure, diesel replacement, fleet grants, TCEQ, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, clean school buses
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
April 10, 2025 - 08:30 AM
Transcript Highlights:
- Then they come in to pay. Countless times. Our certified letter does nothing.
- your taxes, your name goes in the newspaper, and it's really funny how many people go in to pay their
- We do want to contact the person to pay their bill before we sell it.
- , and he... ...had put his tools in the storage unit and then didn't pay, and he had to run a notice.
- All workers deserve a safe workplace, fair pay, and the freedom to prosper. No exceptions.
Summary:
The Civil Justice and Claims Subcommittee heard and voted on four bills. HB 587 on self-storage spaces would let rental agreements include an alternate contact person and allow default notices to be published online instead of only in newspapers, while keeping existing notice timelines and servicemember protections. Newspaper and press witnesses opposed the online-notice change, arguing it could reduce public reach and transparency, especially in rural areas; the sponsor said newspapers could still be used and the bill was only adding another option. The committee adopted an amendment changing the effective date to October 1, 2025, and then reported the bill favorably 12-2.
HB 6033 would repeal the Florida Labor Pool Act. The sponsor argued the act duplicates other state and federal protections, while opponents said it contains unique safeguards for day laborers, including limits on fees, transportation charges, and deductions, and a private right of action. Testimony from labor advocates and workers warned repeal would reduce protections for vulnerable workers; the sponsor and supporters said other laws already cover the issues. The committee reported the bill favorably 11-3.
HB 897, dealing with timeshare plan management, was presented as a clarification of conflicts created by recent condominium legislation and would require faster records responses, more disclosure of contracts, and clearer remedies for mismanagement. Support came from industry groups, and the bill passed unanimously, 14-0. The final measure, PCS for HB 1385, created a civil remedy for parental abduction or unlawful withholding of a child in violation of a timesharing order. Family law attorneys opposed it over concerns about added litigation, child involvement, and overlap with existing remedies, while the sponsors and supporters said it would provide needed deterrence and compensation in serious cases. The committee adopted the PCS and reported it favorably 13-0.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on State Administration Apr 8th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- economic climate that will provide opportunity, continue to inspire entrepreneurship, create good-paying
- Not to pay people to do what they would have done anyway. So I'll give a couple of examples.
- We worked with some partners on the development of the blueprint that shows California pays less per
- Right now, their annual annual is to pay to the state of California is $2,800 a year.
- Any comparison, whether anybody, any other industry pays for it, for that type of service, they pay $100