Video & Transcript : 'campaign planning' :
Page 306 of 500
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Nov 5th, 2025
Legislative Health & Human Services Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- are submitting their plans.
- Once all of those plan development phases are completed, plan submission will occur.
- of those plans.
- If submitted, we could get 13 regional plans with five priorities in each regional plan, and they would
- , and then a contingency plan to the contingency plans, as well as dealing with SNAP benefits—all of
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Health Policy Oct 7th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- AND THE NONEMERGENT CARE ACCESS PLAN.
- DO WE HAVE PLANS? I HEARD LOTS OF PROBLEMS WITH HIE. ARE THERE PLANS TO UPDATE THIS?
- COULD YOU IDENTIFIED THAT PLAN IF YOU KNOW IT OR THE PLANS?
- >> Chair: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> WHEN I SPOKE ABOUT THE PLANS IT IS THE NONEMERGENT ACCESS CARE PLANS
- NOT THEIR MEDICAID PLAN.
MO
Transcript Highlights:
- And the building plans, the complete set of building plans, will have been provided to the municipality
- So SSOIO can say, we want you to offer certain standard plans and certain non-standard plans, and they
- or that you want in a plan, or allowing insurers greater flexibility to offer different plans.
- group plan as much as it would.
- An emergency action plan.
Committee:
House Government Efficiency
Summary:
The committee met in executive session first and took up House Bill 2330, reconsidering a prior due-pass vote and then voting the House Committee Substitute due pass by roll call. It then considered House Bill 2291, where an amendment meant to clarify municipal building-code and zoning authority was discussed at length and ultimately withdrawn after members raised concerns that it would undercut the bill’s purpose; the bill itself then received a due-pass recommendation. House Bill 2336, dealing with state property conveyances and title issues, also drew questions about unclear title and the status of several properties, but the committee adopted the House Committee Substitute and voted the bill do pass. The committee then moved into public hearing on House Bill 3136, which would remove the state prohibition on creating a Missouri-based health insurance exchange; the sponsor and a witness argued it could save money, keep exchange fees in-state, and give Missouri more control, while several members objected that it would reverse the 2012 voter-approved prohibition and could entrench federal health-care policy. No action was taken on that bill in the hearing.
The committee next heard House Bill 1833, which would let certain state employees opt out of the state health plan and receive a partial cash payout if they have other coverage. The sponsor argued it could be cost-neutral or save money and give employees more flexibility, while members and the Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan raised concerns about fiscal impact, adverse selection, administrative burden, and whether the proposal turns a benefit into an entitlement. The witness for the plan said the fiscal note was based on about 4,112 active employees who already opt out, warned the stipend would be taxable and could create a new benefit that is hard to remove, and said proof of outside coverage would need to be maintained. The hearing then moved to House Bill 2506, which would require DESE to post QR-code placards at licensed child care facilities linking parents to existing inspection and complaint records; supporters said it would help parents make safer choices at no fiscal cost, while DESE explained the portal already exists and complaints are investigated quickly, and a witness described serious problems at one facility to illustrate why the information matters.
Finally, the committee opened public hearing on House Bill 1758, a proposal to move Missouri to permanent daylight saving time once federal law allows it. The sponsor argued it would improve safety, boost economic activity, and avoid the inconvenience of changing clocks twice a year, while members raised concerns about darker mornings for schoolchildren and commuters and questioned whether the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. The hearing was still underway when the transcript ended, and no final committee action on House Bill 3136, 1833, 2506, or 1758 was recorded in the excerpt.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- So let's talk about the Fair Plan.
- So let's talk about the Fair Plan.
- How many folks are now moving over to the Fair Plan versus staying on original plans that they had?
- No, there's, so for that Fair Plan policy, that's the risk score for the Fair Plan policy.
- And so that's the plan.
Committee:
House Insurance
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
October 8, 2025 - 10:30 AM
Transcript Highlights:
- So what plans have you made?
- So what plans have you made to deal with that deficit?
- Chair just a quick plan. How will AHCA measure Bibi's Medicaid provisions?
- What's our plan for the applications?
- or not or plans pearl.
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- One difference is the state provided funding for the schools to join the plan.
- I was also told the schools joining the plan had a negligible effect on the plan when it happened.
- The cities are given the option to join the plan.
- sure that they won't impact the plan on a mass basis negatively.
- already exist within the plan.
Committee:
House State Affairs
Summary:
The committee first approved the minutes from Thursday, March 12, and then held House Joint Memorial 19 subject to the call of the chair because Superintendent Critchfield was unavailable. The main item of business was House Bill 725, which would allow Idaho cities to apply to join the state employee health insurance pool through the Office of Group Insurance. Representative Cheatham said the bill is intended to give cities an option to seek lower and more predictable health insurance costs, with all expenses paid by the participating cities. Supporters, including the mayors of Pocatello and Idaho Falls and an Idaho Falls firefighters representative, said rising premiums are straining city budgets, and that joining a larger pool could improve predictability, recruitment, and retention. Committee members questioned whether the bill would shift costs to state taxpayers or attract only higher-risk groups; the Office of Group Insurance administrator said cities would pay 100% of costs, the state general fund would not be affected, and each city would undergo an actuarial review. The committee then voted to send HB 725 to the floor with a do pass recommendation.
The committee next considered RS 33618, a draft bill from Representative Crane to prohibit foreign persons, foreign corporations, foreign governments, foreign REITs, and certain SEC-registered companies from purchasing single-family homes in Idaho. Crane said the measure was meant to prioritize Idahoans in the housing market and limit purchases by large outside entities. Members raised concerns about the breadth of the proposal and how it would affect noncitizens, temporary workers, foreign-owned businesses, and people tied to mining or other industries. The Office of Group Insurance administrator was not involved in this item, but the discussion focused on definitions, enforcement, and whether the bill could be too broad. After debate, the committee voted to introduce RS 33618 with a technical change on page 2, line 13, changing “and” to “or.”
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Environmental Quality Committee Apr 8th, 2026
Environmental Quality
Transcript Highlights:
- plan after plan, sustainable communities plan after plan, and they've been ...sustainable communities
- plan after plan after plan, and they've worked hard with the California Air Resources Board in order
- Let's put a plan in place before the gates close. Thank you.
- And one of the policy fixes that were, were, planning.
- And recognizing the ...to do planning.
Committee:
Senate Environmental Quality
LA
Transcript Highlights:
- The bill in this posture is what my plan does now as an ERISA plan.
- There's ERISA-covered plans, so self-funded plans and union plans.
- There's ERISA-covered plans, so self-funded plans and union plans.
- There's ERISA covered plans, so self-funded plans and union plans.
- So the plan picks up the difference? The plan does.
Committee:
Senate Insurance
Keywords:
family leave, insurance, paid leave, employment benefits, caregiver support, liability insurance, coverage defenses, direct action, judgment enforcement, legal procedures, insurance referrals, compensation, non-licensed agents, consumer protection, insurance products, HB 870, Act 907, Louisiana insurance, health insurance, prescription drugs
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection - 01/30/25
Commerce and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- for plan year 2024.
- for plan year 2024.
- for plan year 2024.
- for plan year 2024.
- </c><00:52:59.079><c> that</c> plan and the premium security plan that plan and the premium security
Committee:
Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement - 04/22/25
Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> recommended by the plan actuary. recommended by the plan actuary.
- because this plan provides a richer plan because this plan provides a richer benefit<00:15:39.519><c
- </c> added to the correctional plan. added to the correctional plan.
- plan they were with.
- This plan is the correctional plan COLA.
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
Health Care Affordability, Select May 1st, 2026
Health Care Affordability, Select
Transcript Highlights:
- It's an insurance plan.
- The plan has to allow it. The plan has to allow it. The parent is not forced to do it.
- The plan will be in a premium. The plan is required to allow it, which increases the price.
- No, I've never seen a plan like that. Yeah. But. No, I've never seen a plan like that.
- Just the Medicare Advantage plan. Just the Medicare Advantage plan.
Committee:
House Health Care Affordability, Select
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Public Works and Highways (01/20/2026)
Public Works and Highways
Transcript Highlights:
- . plan. plan.
- </c> draft plan. draft plan.
- </c><04:08:24.479><c> for</c> in the plan, but it's in the plan for in the plan, but it's in the plan
- Uh the plan the project was plan.
- Planning. Planning.
Committee:
House Public Works and Highways
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee Feb 4th, 2026
Budget and Fiscal Review
Transcript Highlights:
- And that data is from Planned Parenthood themselves?
- And that data is from Planned Parenthood themselves?
- Defund Planned Parenthood by name, specifically, defund Planned Parenthood.
- And so this was a direct attack on Planned Parenthood as an organization to say no, even though Planned
- I want to echo the comments of Planned Parenthood.
Committee:
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Local Government Committee Apr 15th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- care plan.
- by planning for child care.
- or other planning documents.
- family planning.
- So general plans are hard.
Summary:
The committee heard several local government-related bills, with testimony focused on permitting, transportation funding, EV infrastructure, and commercial revitalization. AB 1578 by Assembly Member Jackson would require elected local and state officials to take anti-hate speech training through existing sexual harassment training. Supporters said elected officials should understand the impact of their words on hate and democracy; opponents argued the bill lacked a definition of hate speech and could chill protected speech, especially around sex-based issues.
AB 2083, also by Jackson, would authorize a regional child care special district serving Moreno Valley and Paris to expand child care facilities and programs for five years. The California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions opposed the bill’s mechanism but said it was working with the author. AB 1693 by Assembly Member Suber would streamline retail tenant improvement permits by extending a process similar to a prior restaurant permitting law, with qualified professional certification and tighter local review timelines. It drew broad support from retail, business, and property groups and no opposition.
Assembly Member Gonzalez presented AB 1679, which would create a temporary commercial activation permit for pop-up businesses to operate in vacant storefronts for up to 120 days. Supporters said it would help fill vacancies and lower barriers for small businesses; there was no opposition, and the bill advanced. Gonzalez also presented AB 2418, which would set timelines for nonresidential plan checks and inspections and allow private plan checkers after excessive delay. Business groups supported it as a way to reduce costly delays, while local government groups had no position but continued discussions with the author; the bill advanced with amendments.
Assembly Member Shevlin presented AB 1820, which would cap local permit fees for EV charging installations and create a statewide fee schedule. Supporters said fees vary too widely and can deter charger deployment, while cities and counties argued existing law already requires reasonable cost recovery and that the bill could undercut local budgets and public safety review. Assembly Member DeMaio presented AB 1783, which would prohibit state and local mileage taxes or road user charges. Supporters framed it as a defense against a new tax burden, while opponents said studying road user charges is necessary to address declining gas tax revenue and future transportation funding needs. AB 1693, AB 1679, and AB 2418 were moved forward with motions and roll calls; AB 1783 was taken up with a motion and roll call left open, and AB 1820 remained under discussion at the end of the excerpt.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee Apr 8th, 2026
Housing and Community Development
Transcript Highlights:
- So plan check comes back. It takes like six weeks, you know... ...paying for.
- So plan check comes back. It takes like six weeks.
- Housing for all starts with good plans, and good plans require funding, staffing, and technical capacity
- Lauren De Valencia, representing the American Planning Association, in support.
- I know that the planning is essential, and so I would support this bill. Ms. Wilson.
Committee:
House Housing and Community Development
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Hearing Utilities and Energy Committee and Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee Jan 28th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- First, planning uncertainty.
- And so we can't, we can't plan— More integrated, and so we can't, we can't plan out in pieces because
- The planning forecast supports resource adequacy and integrated resource planning, as well as system-level
- system planning.
- system planning.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- I certainly support preparation of plans. I mean, my background is in urban planning.
- So, I certainly see and understand the need for plans, but also understand that plans have to be realistic
- </c><00:04:17.359><c> to</c> that you know HHFDC prepare a plan to that you know HHFDC prepare a plan
- </c> certainly support preparation of plans. certainly support preparation of plans.
- I wor as a planner for many planning.
Committee:
House Housing
Summary:
The Committee on Housing heard two resolutions. STR 48 SD 1 called for a comprehensive strategy to adopt updated building codes, with testimony listed from several groups but no one appeared to testify. The committee later deferred the measure, noting it was very similar to House Concurrent Resolution 67 House Draft 1.
The committee then took up STR 6D1, which urges the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation to develop a plan to produce enough housing to meet state demand. HHFDC testified that the resolution misstated the scope of low-income housing tax credit units and emphasized that the state’s housing need is much larger than previously cited, with a recent study showing about 33,000 units needed for households at or below 60% AMI statewide. HHFDC supported planning but said any plan must be realistic and account for private land constraints. A member raised concerns about rising leasehold costs and affordability for homeowners, and HHFDC responded that rental affordability can be maintained more readily than for-sale housing.
The committee adopted HHFDC’s proposed amendments to STR 6D1, including deleting a clause about overbuilding, revising the shortage figures, and adding language referencing Senate Bill 26 and the affordable housing land inventory task force. The committee also amended the resolution to focus on density and timing of development for projects identified by that task force. The measure passed with amendments, and the meeting adjourned.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee Feb 4th, 2026
Budget and Fiscal Review
Transcript Highlights:
- And that data is from Planned Parenthood themselves?
- And that data is from Planned Parenthood themselves?
- name, specifically, defund, Defund Planned Parenthood by name, specifically, defund Planned Parenthood
- And so this was a direct attack on Planned Parenthood as an organization to say no, even though Planned
- I want to echo the comments of Planned Parenthood.
Committee:
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review
Summary:
The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee heard AB 106, an early-action budget bill providing $90 million one-time General Fund to support reproductive health providers affected by the federal H.R. 1 prohibition on Medicaid funding. Department of Finance staff explained that the money would be administered as grants through the Department of Health Care Access and Information because affected providers can no longer bill Medi-Cal during the federal restriction, which lasts through July 4, 2026. Members also discussed why the amount increased from an earlier $60 million estimate, with Finance saying the figure was updated based on additional claims data and provider information.
The committee debate focused heavily on the policy implications of the funding. Supporters argued the bill is an emergency response to a targeted federal attack on Planned Parenthood and related family planning services, emphasizing that the funding would backfill non-abortion services such as cancer screenings, contraception, STI testing, mammograms, and prenatal care. Opponents questioned the use of General Fund dollars, the grant structure versus loans for other distressed providers, the Public Records Act exemption, and the bill’s priority compared with rural hospitals, developmental services, public safety, and other budget needs. Finance clarified that the federal funds at issue do not pay for abortion services and that the grant program would be open to eligible providers meeting criteria set by the department.
Public testimony was overwhelmingly in support from Planned Parenthood affiliates, Essential Access Health, Western Center on Law and Poverty, the California Medical Association, family physicians, OBGYN groups, and others, while some commenters used the opportunity to raise unrelated budget concerns such as Medi-Cal dental cuts, IHSS, and CalHome funding. After discussion, the committee approved AB 106 on a 12-4 vote and reported it out. The chair also noted that a later hearing would examine broader H.R. 1 impacts in more detail.
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
JLARC I-900 Subcommittee for SAO Performance Audits Jul 16th, 2025
JLARC I-900 Subcommittee for SAO Performance Audits
Transcript Highlights:
- This is me being a growth management act and planning wonk and comprehensive planning...
- This is me being a Growth Management Act and planning wonk and comprehensive plans.
- The GMA and our climate planning guidance, in particular, is a planning effort for the whole of a local
- That would be another level of planning that goes beyond comprehensive planning.
- We call that the implementation planning.
Summary:
The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee I-900 Subcommittee heard JLARC’s annual update on the status of legislative implementation of State Auditor recommendations, followed by two State Auditor performance audits. JLARC staff reported that for the 2024 review period there were three new legislative recommendations and three unresolved older recommendations. They said the legislature did not convene a work group on civil asset forfeiture, and no formal action was taken on two water-use-efficiency recommendations. Two recommendations related to concurrent Medicaid enrollments were addressed in a bill introduced this session, but that bill was not adopted.
The first audit examined how Washington can ensure climate-resilient electricity infrastructure. The State Auditor found the state has opportunities to better adapt new energy infrastructure by using more site-specific climate information, broader collaboration, and vulnerability assessments. The report recommended expanding climate analyses through the University of Washington Climate Impacts Group if funding is available, using forecasted information in DNR wildfire maps, designating a non-regulatory office to coordinate siting and conflict resolution, and expanding vulnerability assessments in Ecology and Commerce processes. Agency witnesses generally agreed resilience is important but emphasized existing efforts, the need to avoid duplicative requirements, the importance of affordability and efficiency, and the role of current forums such as the Clean Energy Siting Council and SEPA processes.
The second audit reviewed fines for human trafficking and related sexual exploitation crimes. Auditors found courts assessed fines inconsistently, collection rates varied, some revenues were sent to the wrong local government, and some jurisdictions did not use the money as required for enforcement, prevention, or survivor services. The audit recommended courts work with prosecutors to improve awareness of mandatory fines, and that King and Pierce County improve coding, templates, and tracking so revenues are routed and used correctly. King County testified that it appreciated the audit and described its existing prevention and survivor-support work. The committee took no votes or formal actions and adjourned after the presentations and testimony.
MN