Transcript Highlights:

• </c> an example I would say in most programs an example I would say in most programs there<00:24:37.760
• <00:31:26.960><c> is</c><00:31:27.200><c> that</c><00:31:28.159><c> you</c> program is that you program
• </c> region and and really build a program region and and really build a program right<01:14:40.760><
• </c><01:20:09.000><c> is</c> program and this Pathways program is program and this Pathways program is
• Our programs are life changing. Our programs are life changing.

Committee: Senate Jobs and Economic Development

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Those programs are provided in group settings, so they're not individual education programs.
• the farmers market program.
• That is for Our Kids B program. It is for our CHIP program, Children's Health Insurance.
• So this is actually diversion programs that juvenile programs...
• Nuclear One program.

Committee: All JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Stanley, as a sponsored research program, a sponsored program meaning external funding.
• As a sponsored research program, a sponsored program meaning external funding, these funds that were
• The Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at UALR reviewed the expenditures per program guidelines
• I mean, the program staff were administering the program per the guidelines that had been approved by
• The sponsored program reviews...

Committee: All LEGISLATIVE JOINT AUDITING

Summary: The committee first adopted prior minutes and then heard several standing committee audit reports. The executive committee report noted audit and special reports scheduled for the month, one outstanding committee-requested report, and a request to gather information on a possible special report for February. The city/county/local report covered delinquent private water and sewer audits, including reinstatement of turn-back funds for 17 entities, 59 of 64 delinquent 2023 entities filing reports, and action on the town of Daisy requiring repayment of misused street funds. The education report filed three higher education audit reports and deferred one Northwest Arkansas Community College report. The state agencies report filed four reports and deferred audits of the Department of Human Services and the Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism for more information on corrective actions. The committee then received a special audit review of the Charles W. Donaldson Scholars Academy at UA Little Rock. Auditors said the program received $10 million in desegregation funding and a $50,000 grant, awarded $1.87 million in scholarships to 379 students, and saw 116 students graduate. The review found many scholarship eligibility exceptions, including awards above the maximum and to students who did not meet GPA, enrollment-hour, or full-time requirements, and numerous disbursement documentation and authorization problems. Committee members sharply questioned the program’s oversight, the role of former staff, the use of funds for travel and cultural activities, and whether any improper spending should be referred for criminal review. UALR representatives said the program was overseen as a sponsored program, that some controls were later strengthened, and that Philander Smith only verified enrollment rather than eligibility. The committee voted to table the report until the next meeting and asked staff to gather the federal court order and additional information. Finally, the committee reviewed the annual report on matters referred to prosecutors and the Attorney General for 2024. Staff said 164 matters were referred, with 28 criminal charges filed, 39 still under review, 3 dismissed, 5 pending in court, and 96 not charged; convictions in 20 cases led to fines, restitution, audit costs, and some bond trust fund payments. Prosecutor representatives explained that many referrals do not become criminal cases because of intent, timing, or other legal limits, and said they generally seek restitution even when charges are not filed. Members asked for more standardized reporting, including whether restitution was recovered and why cases were not prosecuted, and discussed possible training and a checklist for future reports. The committee then voted to file the report and adjourned, with the next meeting set for February 12-13.

Transcript Highlights:

• So the first program is limited in how much they can work, the second program is limited to how much
• Once you're in the program, you're in the program, and depending on which program you're in, you could
• That program is no longer available.
• In the return to work program, I wanted to highlight that the only program that requires return to work
• Program requirements.

Committee: House Investments & Pensions Oversight Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• And we did a lot of really cutting-edge program integrity work with Medicaid and with other programs,
• The program integrity space and focus on foundational pillars such as program integrity are essential
• about what we're doing in the program integrity space and focus on foundational pillars. the program
• I want programs to be sustainable.
• And then on the EES program, that program has reverted And then on the EES program, that program has

Committee: Senate Health and Welfare

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:20:26.559><c> STARS</c><00:20:27.640><c> program</c> of Alternative Programs STARS program of
• program.
• program.
• program.
• </c> cycle as traditional programs. cycle as traditional programs.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:02:53.519><c> Integrity</c> support program Integrity support program Integrity enhancements<
• /c><00:04:42.360><c> program</c><00:04:43.120><c> by</c> start scholarship program by start scholarship
• </c><00:05:19.919><c> when</c><00:05:20.080><c> program</c> actors from public programs when program
• So, um, we have a few more programs to transition over to us, including programs from the Department
• So, um, we have a few more programs to transition over to us, including programs from the Department

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I think starting programs and ending programs over and over again is worse than never even having them
• Funeral program for someone who had passed away and became the local funeral program creator.
• welfare programs.
• Regarding our STEM CMA program is a year-long extensive program.
• in the program.

Committee: House House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• as the program of last resort.
• benefits, and eligibility requirements of each of the programs, program infrastructure.
• So, as I mentioned, with these programs declining in enrollment, a number of programs have limited the
• as the program of last resort.
• with these programs declining in enrollment number of programs have limited the networks that provide

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Program, or CFAP.
• were on the federal program.
• this program.
• and the Commodity Supplemental Food Program, also known as CSFP or the Senior Food Program.
• Our staff do multiple programs. So the workload is also keeping the right programs. Graham.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a program where we.
• With just under $10 million, we recently launched a new program called the ZIP program, Zero Interest
• Development Program.
• program, our Destination Forward program, and our Clean and Beautiful program.
• : the Events Program, the Destination Forward Program, and Clean and Beautiful.

Transcript Highlights:

• I don't think any of us would disagree that you have to streamline programs, you have to make programs
• Program, or CFAP.
• For farm safety net programs, it provides appropriations for many of the farm safety net programs that
• Program.
• . programs.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And there is a great program.
• And there is a great program.
• , and our school-age programs.
• , program type 2 family child care, and program type 3 center child care?
• to continue with the program.

Committee: Joint Human Services Committee

Summary: The committee first approved the February 11, 2026 minutes and then received an update from the North Dakota Housing Finance Agency on the interagency council on homelessness and continuum of care funding. Testimony described rising homelessness tied to tight housing markets, low incomes, aging homelessness, barriers to rental assistance and public benefits, and limited shelter and case-management capacity. Members discussed the need for more affordable housing, continued one-time funding for the North Dakota Homeless Grant and Housing Incentive Fund, better coordination with Health and Human Services on economic assistance and human service zones, landlord engagement, recovery housing, and reentry housing. The committee also heard that federal continuum of care funding remains uncertain, with possible shifts away from permanent supportive housing and housing-first models; members asked for a future update on the impact if federal rules reduce the share available for permanent housing. The committee then took testimony on accessibility of government services for people who are blind or visually impaired. Paul Olson of North Dakota Vision Services School for the Blind described current screening and service delivery, including infant referrals, regional staff, short-term programs, and collaboration with vocational rehabilitation. He said the targeted screening system is working, recommended maintaining the current model, and noted ongoing challenges with staffing, public awareness, and accessible state websites and documents. Public testimony from a visually impaired resident and a deaf resident emphasized barriers such as CAPTCHAs, inaccessible PDFs, employment forms that screen out applicants based on driver’s license status, shortages of interpreters, and the need for video remote interpreting and video relay services, along with training for users and agencies. Finally, the committee heard a final report on the study of child care provider licensing from HHS Early Childhood Director Kay Larson. The report summarized provider input and committee discussion on simplifying North Dakota’s child care licensing structure, reducing administrative burden, and balancing that with health and safety standards. Key topics included licensing categories, child care assistance eligibility, food program sponsorship, staff qualifications, training requirements, ratios and group size, age bands, and preschool exemptions. The committee’s recommendations included streamlining to three provider types plus a preschool designation, revising ratio and age-band rules, and carrying forward certain preschool outdoor-space exemptions. Larson noted that any changes would require statutory changes, rulemaking, and a transition period before new licensing rules could take effect.

Transcript Highlights:

• PROGRAM REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PERFORMANCE MEASURING PROGRAM WITH SECRETARY DIXON.
• SO AS IT RELATES TO PROGRAMS WE KNOW THAT IF WE INVOLVE INDIVIDUALS IN EDUCATION PROGRAMMING THEY HAD
• OTHER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES.
• WITH THEIR PROGRAM THERE.
• THOSE ARE PROGRAMMING SERVICES.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So the breakfast program, the food program, the milk program, there's all separate programs that have
• food program the milk program the food program the milk program<00:22:36.799><c> there's</c><00:22:37.080
• </c> nutrition program is a program about nutrition program is a program about reimbursing<00:43:52.760
• program or plan education program program or plan program<00:54:04.160><c> program</c><00:54:04.839>
• program um IND education program program program um IND education program and<00:54:07.079><c> then<

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Finance Committee Division II met with the New Hampshire Department of Education to review school nutrition programs and related funding. Department staff Melissa White and Kelly Rambo walked through a packet covering the National School Lunch Program, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, Community Eligibility (CEP), After School Snack Program, Child and Adult Care Food Program, and Summer Food Service Program, explaining that these are federally funded USDA programs, with some state supplemental funding in certain areas. They also reviewed reimbursement rates for lunch, breakfast, child/adult care, and summer meals, noting that summer rates follow calendar-year timing while most others follow the state fiscal year. Members asked several questions about how the funding works, especially the difference between federal reimbursements and the state match. Staff explained that the state lunch line in the budget is a fixed match amount tied to federal participation, while breakfast funding is broken out by meal type and reimbursement category. They also discussed why FY 2022 federal spending was much higher during COVID, when USDA covered meals at the free rate for all students, and why FY 2023 and FY 2024 dropped as normal income-eligibility rules returned. A committee member also asked about the “severe need lunch” two-cent rate, and staff said they did not know USDA’s formula. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on summer meals and the distinction between the Summer Food Service Program and Summer EBT. Staff explained that SFSP provides meals at approved sites, which can be open or closed sites, while Summer EBT is a separate DHHS-operated benefit program that provides funds to families. They said some schools or sites may not qualify under USDA rules, but eligible children can often use another nearby open site, and the department posts an interactive map and phone line to help families find locations. The committee also discussed the Community Eligibility Provision. Staff said New Hampshire currently has three CEP schools, that the eligibility threshold had recently been lowered from 40% to 25% identified students, and that the program allows participating schools to offer free meals to all students while the local district covers the non-federal share. Members asked whether any districts in the 25% to 40% range had joined; staff said no. The department offered to provide the eligibility report in Excel and noted that the CEP intent is to reduce application burden, though the lower threshold can make the local cost share harder for some districts to absorb.

Transcript Highlights:

• We know that this program works.
• We estimate the program will cost $88 million.
• My concern is mainly for arts programs.
• know that there's necessarily a large number Of arts programs or music programs in those.
• You know, the program at this point has been basically an income-based program based on the adjusted

Committee: House Appropriations and Budget

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh this is a competitive grant program at DEED to fund nonprofit vehicle programs offering affordable
• Getting to Work grant program.
• So, this is a great program.
• program, or is this separate?
• </c> our program. our program.

Committee: Senate Jobs and Economic Development

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , grantees forfeit their grants from the specialty dental clinic grant program, which is a grant program
• program authorized by H.R. 1 under CMS's direction.
• to participating grantees across all of the program components.
• The program is designed to complement, not duplicate, existing state and federal programs, targeting
• And that's just the nature of the program.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Health heard updates on five health-related budget items. First, members reviewed state support for distressed hospitals and health facilities. The California Health Facilities Financing Authority and HCAI described the Distressed Hospital Loan Program as a lifeline for 16 hospitals, many of which remain financially strained and are expected to seek loan forgiveness rather than repayment. Speakers cited reduced contract labor, new service lines, strategic partnerships, and the reopening of Madera Hospital as signs of progress, but also warned that federal policy changes under H.R. 1 will likely increase uncompensated care and pressure emergency departments. Public commenters from hospital, dental, and consumer groups supported additional funding, including a request to refresh the program with another $300 million. The committee then heard HCAI’s update on the California Rural Health Transformation Program, a five-year federal initiative funded at $233.6 million for California. HCAI said the program will focus on rural care models, workforce development, and health technology, with grants to be rolled out on a fast timeline and all funds obligated by October 30, 2026. Members raised concerns about rural provider capacity to apply for grants, and HCAI said it will use a third-party administrator, a technical assistance center, webinars, and other supports to help applicants. HCAI also presented its budget request for the health care payments database, seeking ongoing non-General Fund support to continue operations and expand data, including pharmacy benefit manager data. The Emergency Medical Services Authority presented three budget change proposals: funding to replace disaster medical services fleet vehicles, funding for IT security work, and additional positions for HR, enforcement, and legal workload. A member also raised concern that EMSA has not yet completed the annual ambulance rate reporting required by AB 716, and EMSA said it remains committed to the requirement but lost prior funding through later budget reductions. Covered California reported that it is still finalizing its own budget, but expects a lower operating budget due to efforts to reduce baseline costs and align spending with actual expenditures; it also projected enrollment declines tied to the expiration of enhanced premium tax credits, H.R. 1, and federal rule changes, while noting that revenues may still rise because premiums are expected to increase. Finally, the Department of Managed Health Care outlined budget proposals tied to menopause coverage and education, PBM licensure and enforcement under AB 116 and SB 41, credentialing reforms under AB 1041, and prior authorization reporting under SB 306. Public testimony generally supported the menopause and PBM proposals, while also urging clearer language and attention to Medi-Cal parity. The hearing concluded after public comment, including additional advocacy for sickle cell services and rural health workforce funding.

Transcript Highlights:

• Program.
• can be a robotics program.
• Sorry, program.
• program.
• My question is, on the virtual programs, online programs, are all these programs only for New Mexico

Committee: Senate Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:

• We started out with one program, which was our first-time homebuyer program.
• Since that start of that one program, we've grown to administering over 40 programs.
• I will note there are some other states that fund different programs Monitor a program for a program
• The funding We have two different program models for our Homeowner Rehab Program.
• program.

Committee: House Mortgage Finance Authority Act Oversight Committee