Transcript Highlights:

• studies show that access to parks and open space can reduce stress in children, improve academic performance
• Just Monday, we kicked off a workshop to start an evaluation of the existing wolf livestock compensation
• They need to be evaluated to ensure that, maybe not decontaminated, but they need to be inspected to

Summary: The Senate Budget Subcommittee on Resources, Environmental Protection, and Energy convened for its first hearing and heard an overview from the Legislative Analyst’s Office and the Natural Resources Agency. The LAO emphasized California’s strong current revenues but warned of a structural budget problem, projected out-year deficits, and the need for a high bar on new spending. It generally supported the administration’s Proposition 4 spending plan as reasonable and consistent with bond requirements, while urging legislative oversight and caution about using special funds and adding ongoing commitments. Secretary Wade Crowfoot responded with an overview of climate, wildfire, water, coastal, and conservation challenges and highlighted progress under the Newsom administration, including clean energy growth, wildfire resilience investments, land conservation, tribal co-management, and outdoor access initiatives. He also discussed federal staffing cuts affecting California’s response capacity and said the state has had to fill gaps in flood forecasting, land management, and park access. Members then questioned the secretary about the Delta conveyance tunnel and broader water reliability issues. Crowfoot said the project remains important, is being pursued as a beneficiary-pays project, and is moving through the State Water Resources Control Board’s permitting process, while also stressing that it is only one part of a broader water strategy that includes levee strengthening, subsidence, groundwater storage, recycling, and conservation. Senators also raised concerns about permitting delays, invasive species, and the impact of position cuts on agency capacity; Crowfoot said streamlining is needed but that staffing remains essential. The committee then moved to the Department of Parks and Recreation, where Director Armando Quintero described the state park system, tribal agreements, wildfire and deferred maintenance work, and outdoor access programs such as the State Library Park Pass and Adventure Pass. The LAO recommended rejecting the proposed ongoing $6.75 million General Fund transfer for the library park pass, arguing it did not meet the high bar for new ongoing spending, but several senators strongly supported the program as a low-cost way to expand access. Members also pressed Parks on reservation system problems and campsite no-shows. Department staff said they are updating website guidance, working with the reservation vendor, and implementing new no-show and reservation-modification rules effective July 1, including penalties for repeated no-shows and immediate reopening of vacant sites. The committee then heard a low-cost accommodations proposal, which Parks said would fund planning and construction at several sites using Proposition 68, reimbursements, and donations; the LAO said it had no concerns. Finally, the new director of the Department of Fish and Wildlife, Megan Hurdle, introduced herself and outlined the department’s mission, staffing, service-based budgeting, and Proposition 4 requests, including funding for salmon genetic tagging, hatchery repairs, and public access improvements. She said the department is focused on biodiversity, permitting streamlining, law enforcement, and human-wildlife conflict prevention, and noted that the agency is still updating its service-based budgeting analysis to identify gaps and priorities.

Transcript Highlights:

• studies show that access to parks and open space can reduce stress in children, improve academic performance
• Just Monday, we kicked off a workshop to start an evaluation of the existing wolf livestock compensation
• Just Monday, we kicked off a workshop to start an evaluation of the existing wolf lifestyle compensation

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• the discussions that were had with the Pro Tem's office and the Senate Education Committee, they evaluated
• I know that there were, that is part of the Senate Education Committee, they evaluated a number of offices
• education implementation, that will house the Office of Civil Rights that is intended to kind of perform

Summary: The Assembly Education Committee held an informational hearing on AB 715, followed by discussion of SB 48. AB 715 was presented by Assembly Members Zbur and Addis as a response to rising anti-Semitism in California schools. They described incidents involving harassment, swastikas, biased classroom materials, and students feeling unsafe, and said the bill would create an Office of Civil Rights with coordinators to address anti-Semitism and other forms of discrimination, provide prevention resources, and support school districts. Witnesses in support, including a rabbi and a student who described personal experiences with anti-Semitic harassment, urged immediate action to protect Jewish students. Opposition testimony came from the California Teachers Association, county superintendents, school board groups, labor organizations, civil liberties advocates, ethnic studies educators, and many community members. Their main concerns were that the bill was rushed, had not been fully vetted in the Assembly Education Committee, and could chill classroom speech or create constitutional problems, especially around language requiring instruction and materials to be “factually accurate” and not based on advocacy, bias, or partisanship. Several opponents argued that anti-Semitism should be addressed through education, training, and restorative practices rather than new statutory restrictions. Some witnesses also raised concerns about the bill’s impact on ethnic studies and free speech. Committee members then debated the bill’s process and substance at length. The authors said the bill had been narrowed through negotiations with education stakeholders and the Senate, that some disputed provisions would be revisited in cleanup language, and that the urgency of anti-Semitic incidents required action now. Several members expressed support for the bill’s goal but criticized the late release of the final language and the lack of consultation with the Assembly committee. Others emphasized the need to protect Jewish students immediately and argued the bill was a necessary response to a real crisis. The transcript does not show a final vote on AB 715 in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• They can perform other duties, and certainly anybody who's an armed guard, you know, they should meet
• Well, a school district usually needs one Spanish-language evaluation.
• Well, a school district evaluations.
• They don't need some some evaluation.
• </c> to come and evaluate the student. to come and evaluate the student. that<02:51:40.640><c> p</c><

Committee: House Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We started this in the 1990s, and we've continued to grow and perfect the tools, continue to evaluate
• And I will also share that... ...we have been able to get the evaluation for this waiver at no cost.
• The University of Pennsylvania is going to complete our evaluation at no cost using grant funds that
• I think we will definitely be doing the evaluation.
• And our evaluation also has a control state, so there is a study and a survey going on in that state

Committee: All JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE

Summary: The committee reviewed three DHS service contracts: a $690,000-plus sole-source contract for DCFS with Evident Change for maintenance and operation of the Child Welfare Structured Decision-Making Assessment tools; a $1.2 million contract with Sifter Solutions for a SNAP waiver compliance solution and related app; and a $156,000 contract with Samaritan Integrative Services for psychiatric services at the Southeast Arkansas Human Development Center. Staff said the Evident Change contract was needed to keep daily safety risk assessments, case planning, and reunification tools functioning, and that the vendor’s proprietary system made it sole source. Members questioned DHS about reliance on the vendor, the lack of an off-ramp, whether the state was paying more or less annually, and why the contracts were not aligned on the same cycle. DHS and the vendor said the new Evident Change contract was limited to maintenance and operations, that no additional services or employees were being added, and that the broader CQI/review contract would come up separately later. For the SNAP waiver contract, DHS explained that the waiver is intended to exclude certain unhealthy foods from SNAP purchases to improve nutritional value, and that Sifter Solutions would provide a dynamic list for retailers and an app for clients to check products by barcode. DHS said the contract is sole source because it is tied to the waiver implementation and because the vendor can provide the needed dynamic list and education features. Staff said the contract would be funded with remaining federal SNAP Nutrition Education dollars that would otherwise revert to the federal government, and that the University of Pennsylvania would conduct the evaluation at no cost. Members asked about the public benefit, future renewals, and whether the state would own the application; DHS said the two-year term was designed to match the waiver period and allow time to reassess future procurement options. Members also asked about the nutrition education component, and DHS said it is developing videos with a nutritionist on preparing budget-friendly healthy meals and plans to link them to the app and website. After discussion, no objections were raised, and the items were reported as reviewed. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> It clarifies the credentials of a member of the solid waste site evaluation committee to ensure
• </c> language from the energy site evaluation language from the energy site evaluation committee<00:36
• And finally, it clarifies that the solid waste site evaluation committee can only issue a certificate
• it would seem to me that the evaluation it would seem to me that on<00:41:14.960><c> page</c><00:41:
• </c> evaluation procedure. Same words. evaluation procedure. Same words.

Committee: Senate Finance

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , and the admissibility of a child custody evaluation under certain circumstances.
• as evidence in court proceedings unless evaluators met the training requirements.
• My family was subject to a child custody evaluation done by a domestic relations office.
• To my house to do the evaluation.
• The child that was subject to the evaluation had Down syndrome; she's my stepdaughter.

Bills: SB1538 , SB2883 , HB1734 , HB2340 , HB2350 , HB3376

Committee: Senate Jurisprudence

Keywords: digital court reporting, court reporting, court reporter, electronic recording, audio recording, video recording, transcription, verbatim record, judicial administration, Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial System, courts, depositions, grand jury, referee, court commissioner, court technology, courtroom technology, access to justice, accuracy

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, those rank lists are developed through the advisory committee evaluation and scoring process.
• We do some of our evaluations online now.
• We do some that are written evaluations.
• And then we schedule a day where each sponsor has time so that if the evaluators have questions, they
• When you're evaluating the grants, how are we making sure that the grants are being... gotten to the

Summary: The committee held public hearings on several capital-related bills. HB 2353 would raise the pre-design threshold for state-funded capital projects from $10 million to $15 million and index it to inflation beginning in 2027. The sponsor and a testifier said the change would reduce delays and save money on projects by avoiding costly pre-design work for mid-sized projects; staff noted the bill could reduce future capital budget costs. HB 2420 would increase the Small Works roster contract cap in stages from $350,000 to $650,000 by 2030, with a proposed substitute shifting the first increase from July 2026 to January 2027 to allow time for rulemaking. Testimony from universities, cities, ports, counties, and water/sewer districts supported the bill as a way to reduce administrative burden, speed projects, and help small and diverse contractors. The committee also heard HB 2470, which would change how the School Construction Assistance Program treats school facilities on military bases. Staff explained the bill would exclude on-base instructional space from a district’s available-space calculation and adjust state assistance to account for federal funding, potentially increasing eligibility for affected districts such as Clover Park and Medical Lake. The sponsor and supporters said current rules unfairly reduce state support for districts serving military families; OSPI testified in support but said the bill would need amendment to avoid federal-law issues and was working on a revised approach that would increase the SCAP funding assistance percentage instead of directly referencing federal funds. Clover Park School District and the Veterans Legislative Coalition also supported the measure. In executive session, the committee moved HB 2338, which expands the low-income weatherization program to include community-scaled projects, out of committee with a do-pass recommendation by a vote of 17 ayes and 2 excused. The committee then held a work session with the Recreation and Conservation Office on its competitive grant programs, including Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program accounts, youth athletic facilities, community forests, aquatic lands, boating, off-road vehicle, firearms and archery, and federal grant programs. Members asked about demand, ADA compliance, geographic distribution, and technical assistance; RCO said demand is high in several programs and that it uses scoring criteria, regional allocations, and outreach to improve access statewide.

Transcript Highlights:

• Additionally, the language from the trailer bill, which addresses the siting evaluation committee, was
• I think it's really important that the moratorium and the site evaluation committee, as we've talked
• I think it's really important that the moratorium and the site evaluation committee, as we've talked
• I think it's really important that the moratorium and the site evaluation committee, as we've talked
• And as for the site evaluation committee, I think it's really critical that we have that in a separate

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee met in executive session on SB 302, a bill requiring background checks for solid waste and hazardous waste facility owners. Members discussed and adopted amendment 2025-2219H, which incorporated language from prior Senate and House amendments, including provisions related to the siting evaluation committee and changes affecting landfill expansions and additional cells. The amendment also folded in language from HB 616, the animal cruelty/due process bill, which members said clarifies probable cause, imminent danger, temporary protective custody, and the role of the state veterinarian or designee in animal seizure decisions. Several members emphasized that the bill does not bar seizure of animals in emergencies or prevent nonprofits from fundraising, and that the changes are intended to strengthen due process and reduce conflicts of interest. The committee voted 12-0 to adopt the amendment. It then voted 12-0 to give SB 302 an OTPA recommendation with the amendment included. After the vote, the director raised a concern that the amendment appeared to eliminate the waste management council and related appeal provisions in the governing statutes; members acknowledged the issue and said it was intentional or at least acceptable to address later in committee of conference, where they expected further changes. The committee then agreed to place the bill on the consent calendar. After concluding the executive session, the committee discussed an afternoon field trip to research farms in Lee and Durham. They also accepted an invitation to visit a farm in Fremont on May 30 at 10:00 a.m., with the address provided as 63 South Road, Fremont, New Hampshire.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:44:50.880><c> a</c><00:44:51.119><c> Medicaid</c><00:44:51.920><c> uh</c> order to evaluate a
• Medicaid uh order to evaluate a Medicaid uh application.<00:44:53.520><c> So,</c><00:44:53.760><c> I
• So maybe it is worth a little performative anger, quote unquote, to address properly. Thank you.
• ><01:32:09.120><c> always</c><01:32:09.600><c> hard</c><01:32:09.840><c> to</c><01:32:10.080><c> evaluate
• </c> because it's always hard to evaluate because it's always hard to evaluate your<01:32:10.960><c>

Committee: House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• grant award cap of $20,000 for centers and $115,000 for licensed family child care applications were evaluated
• child care for licensed family child care applications<01:16:51.520><c> were</c><01:16:51.840><c> evaluated
• c><01:16:52.600><c> based</c><01:16:52.880><c> on</c><01:16:53.120><c> how</c> applications were evaluated
• based on how applications were evaluated based on how much<01:16:53.520><c> the</c><01:16:53.600><c>
• Senate File 1898 is to perform a transparent, independent external analysis of the complex streams of

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Their performance reflects the dedication of their teachers and the support of the Wellsboro community
• Their performance<02:08:37.119><c> reflects</c><02:08:37.520><c> the</c><02:08:37.679><c> dedication<
• /c><02:08:38.159><c> of</c> performance reflects the dedication of performance reflects the dedication
• Since 2018, it has also been authorized to perform reviews of land purchases near sensitive government
• these transactions is more evaluate these transactions is more important<04:11:19.120><c> than</c><04

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, June 23, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• a remedy for them to move as they should move across the career ladder as they improve on their evaluations
• They're stuck for up to four years, where they have to have a proficient or better evaluation in their
• professional evaluation.
• So in the meantime, while other colleagues of theirs... ...professional evaluation.
• , they would be allowed to move after one year of proficient evaluation.

Committee: House Education

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 24, 25, and 26 by voice vote. It then heard a bill from Representative Galavis concerning transportation reimbursement for one Idaho charter school, Answer Charter School. Galavis explained that the school’s reimbursement is being calculated from an old, limited bus use rather than from its current full transportation program, leaving it reimbursed at about 50% instead of the 70–90% typical for other districts and charters. Members raised questions about where the $40,000 fiscal impact would come from and whether it would affect other transportation reimbursements; those questions were deferred for further explanation at a later hearing. The committee voted to introduce RS 33-448. The committee also discussed RS 33-448, described as a fix for career ladder placement for career technical education professionals and qualified pupil service staff. Supporters said the proposal would allow industry professionals such as welders and electricians, as well as school psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists, to move more fairly through the career ladder after demonstrating proficiency, rather than being stuck for up to four years. They said the fiscal note is difficult to estimate because the number of affected employees could vary, but the overall impact was expected to be low. Members asked whether the proposal overlapped with other legislation on employee classification, and sponsors said it did not because it addresses career ladder placement rather than job definitions. Representative Pickett then moved to introduce RS 33-433, which was also supported as a way to help attract experienced tradespeople into classrooms. He and others argued that the state needs more flexibility to bring in people with deep industry experience without forcing them through unnecessary recertification barriers. The committee approved RS 33-433 by voice vote. The chair concluded by noting that the committee would meet earlier the next day to hear several difficult RSs and that there would likely be many questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• a remedy for them to move as they should move across the career ladder as they improve on their evaluations
• But they're stuck for up to four years, where they have to have a proficient or better evaluation in
• their professional evaluation.
• So in the meantime, while other colleagues of theirs... ...professional evaluation.
• , they would be allowed to move after one year of proficient evaluation.

Committee: House Education

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We'll cover that in Jennifer's evaluation in the excellent.
• We'll cover that in Jennifer's evaluation in the exact. Excellent. I think I should be fired.
• There's another evaluation. Okay. Moving on in this public forum, advisory opinions.
• I assume you still meant we will always evaluate it based on these.
• So my question is, do you need to unretire... ...always evaluate it based on these.

Summary: The meeting opened with attendance and technical setup, including bringing a remote member into the session. The chair also made brief remarks about public service in light of recent violence against public officials, and a member shared condolences related to a colleague’s death. The committee then approved the minutes and noted no employment disclosure forms were filed. The main business was an update on digitizing committee files. Staff reported that the archival scanning estimate had been reduced and that a DocuSign contract would be sent for the chair’s signature. Members also discussed whether the work could be completed before the end of the biennium and whether existing funds could be used or prepaid. The committee then reviewed a long list of remaining advisory opinions and, on motion, approved staff recommendations to retain some opinions and retire or partially retire others based on changes in law or usefulness of the opinions. Topics included special privileges, frequent flyer miles, state contracts involving legislators, tours sponsored by lobbying entities, conflicts of interest, confidentiality of drafting requests, election-year brochures, and recusal/firewall issues. After a separate discussion about an older election-related outreach opinion, members agreed they likely still intended to apply the same factors outside the election-year context and asked staff to revisit whether that opinion should be unretired or revised. The public portion of the meeting was then adjourned, with the committee preparing to move into executive session.

Transcript Highlights:

• Early Literacy Program External Evaluation, $750,000.
• Early Literacy Program External Evaluation, $750,000.
• Energy performance for buildings. Electric vehicle charging station grant.
• </c><04:52:50.000><c> for</c> 4.5 FTE 6 Energy performance for 4.5 FTE 6 Energy performance for 71,300,1300
• Evidence-based policymaking evaluation and support: $150,000.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• benefit after 12 overall all performance benefit after 12 months.<02:52:33.279><c> There</c><02:52:33.439
• Is the coach supposed to be the person who evaluates birth certificates and knows what a legitimate birth
• 03:00:36.800><c> who</c> coach supposed to be the person who coach supposed to be the person who evaluates
• birth certificates and knows evaluates birth certificates and knows what<03:00:39.600><c> a</c><03:00
• a stat C-section or had to performed a stat C-section or had to personally<03:29:59.840><c> scoop</c

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It expands on a report card that our State Department of Education is putting out, but it's to evaluate
• All the tests that they take would be evaluated.
• There's a few other tests that they have to... that they'll evaluate and they'll do.
• It was much so I think for sort of self-evaluation as well from the individual teacher prep programs
• They should have got two toes. for sort of self-evaluation as well from for sort of self-evaluation as

Committee: House Education Policy

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• addresses how we handle children when they've been identified, where we can order a mental health evaluation
• those threats and created the problem, it has a program whereby they can be addressed with a mental evaluation
• They will order a mental evaluation.
• It also establishes minimum requirements for those service agreements, requiring that repairs be performed

Bills: HR72 , HR73 , HR74 , HR75 , HR76 , HR77 , HR78 , HR79 , HR80 , HR81 , HR82 , HR83 , HCR36 , HCR37 , HCR38 , HCR39 , HCR40 , HCR41 , HB368 , HB433 , HB1017 , HB1018 , HB1019 , HB1020 , HB1021 , HB1022 , HB1023 , HB1024 , HB1025 , HB1026 , HB1027 , HB1028 , HB1029 , HB1030 , HB1031 , HB1032 , HB1033 , HB1034 , HB1035 , HB1036 , HB1037 , HB1038 , HB1039 , HB1040 , HB1041 , HB1042 , HB1043 , HB1044 , HB1045 , HB1046 , HB1047 , HB1048 , HB1049 , HB1050 , HB1051 , HB1052 , HB1053 , HB1054 , HB1055 , HB1056 , HB1057 , HB1058 , HB1059 , HB1060 , HB1061 , HB1062 , HB1063 , HB1064 , HB1065 , HB1066 , HB1067 , HB1068 , HB1069 , HB1070 , HB1071 , HB1072 , HB1073 , HB1074 , HB1075 , HB1076 , HB1077 , HB1078 , HB1079 , HB1080 , HB1081 , HB1082 , HB1083 , HB1084 , HR70 , HR71 , HCR35 , HB31 , HB326 , HB1013 , HB1014 , HB1015 , HB1016 , SB192 , SB196 , SB198 , SB203 , SB204 , SB214 , SB216 , SB257 , SB291 , SB383 , HB13 , HB23 , HB25 , HB32 , HB41 , HB42 , HB90 , HB120 , HB121 , HB122 , HB127 , HB138 , HB139 , HB141 , HB179 , HB187 , HB213 , HB247 , HB286 , HB332 , HB344 , HB357 , HB367 , HB370 , HB462 , HB505 , HB527 , HB537 , HB605 , HB680 , HB681 , HB725 , HB780 , HB782 , HB847 , HB892 , HB911 , HB916 , HB1012 , HR15 , HR20 , HCR14 , HB53 , HB57 , HB64 , HB102 , HB106 , HB111 , HB137 , HB152 , HB155 , HB177 , HB238 , HB256 , HB258 , HB337 , HB359 , HB363 , HB386 , HB434 , HB546 , HB557 , HB584 , HB661 , HB697 , HB726 , HB727 , HB747 , HB756 , HB758 , HB759 , HB765 , HB767 , HB825 , HB858 , HB930 , HB941 , HB957 , HB964 , HB58 , HB69 , HB93 , HB166 , HB199 , HB201 , HB202 , HB218 , HB223 , HB224 , HB231 , HB235 , HB246 , HB338 , HB349 , HB352 , HB379 , HB405 , HB429 , HB535 , HB547 , HB577 , HB588 , HB626 , HB636 , HB652 , HB653 , HB669 , HB688 , HB691 , HB721 , HB738 , HB806 , HB851 , HB857 , HB861 , HB889 , HB904 , HB907 , HB908 , HB929 , HB1009 , HB868 , HB119 , HB140 , HB739 , HB842 , HB875 , HB919 , HB61 , HB185 , HB233 , HB613 , HB848 , HB52 , HB228 , HB289 , HB735 , HB796 , HB722 , HB284 , HB301 , HB827 , HB953 , HB901 , HB9 , HB46 , HB193 , HB400 , HB436 , HB468 , HB570 , HB582 , HB733 , HB746 , HB923 , HB952

Keywords: HR72, House Resolution 72, Sophia Patout, Layla Porter, St. Amant High School, Future Farmers of America, FFA, Coastal Restoration Heroes, coastal restoration, Louisiana coast, coastal land loss, wetlands, saltmarsh, barrier island, West Grand Terre Island, Restore or Retreat Inc., smooth cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora, black mangrove, Avicennia germinans

Transcript Highlights:

• any person who knowingly maintains or commits a public nuisance or knowingly fails or refuses to perform
• probation, if they're in an accident on their way to a probation appointment or a psychosexual evaluation
• Right now, if a violation occurs, a judge can evaluate the full context, whether it is a technical violation
• They simply allow a judge to evaluate progress, risk, and evidence on an individual basis.

Summary: The committee heard and acted on several bills dealing with elections, juvenile representation, paternity, and campaign finance. SB 1489 would require paid petition circulators to disclose their name, residence, and paid status, wear a badge, register in some local petition efforts, and subject local initiatives to stricter compliance and fiscal disclosure rules. Supporters said it would standardize rules and improve transparency; opponents, including the ACLU, argued it would chill core political speech and compel identification. The bill received a do-pass recommendation by a 4-3 vote. SB 1609, an emergency measure restricting political party names from using terms like “independent” or “unaffiliated,” drew support from county election officials who said it would reduce voter confusion, and opposition from the Arizona Independent Party, which called it retroactive and anti-competitive. The committee adopted an amendment and then passed the bill 7-0. SCR 1040, which would raise the mandatory retirement age for judges from 70 to 75 subject to voter approval, was supported as reflecting longer life expectancy and retaining experienced judges, but opposed by some who favored age limits; it passed 5-2. The committee then took up SB 1234, which would change juvenile court representation by requiring a guardian ad litem in dependency and termination cases and allowing, rather than requiring, separate child counsel in some circumstances. Sponsor Senator Werner said the bill was part of a broader child-safety package and was informed by cases involving children who died after alleged system failures. Child welfare attorneys and advocates opposed the bill, warning it would weaken attorney-client privilege and take away children’s independent voice, while DCS said the bill was intended to clarify the GAL role and could work alongside child counsel. The committee adopted an amendment and passed the bill 5-2. SB 1661, allowing child support obligations to be terminated when genetic testing shows a presumed father is not the biological father, received broad support from the sponsor, a fathers’ advocacy group, and a family representative, and passed 6-0. Later, the committee considered election-administration and campaign-finance measures. SB 1392 would give governing bodies canvassing elections access to election-material locations to observe procedures and review records, while protecting privacy and security; county officials supported access but raised concerns about the term “agent,” and the bill passed 4-3. SB 1634 would require ADOT to provide county recorders with applicants’ handwritten signatures collected during voter registration; county officials said it would improve signature verification, and the bill passed 5-2 after some members noted amendment concerns. SB 1743 would redact donors’ employer street addresses and residence addresses from campaign finance reports; supporters framed it as a privacy measure, while opponents said employer information is important for transparency and identifying influence. It passed 5-2. SB 1099, a strike-everything amendment defining defamation standards for public and private figures, was presented as narrowing and clarifying defamation law and passed 4-3. After a recess, the committee heard SB 1535, which would make paying for sexual conduct a prostitution offense and add a $200 assessment to fund anti-human-trafficking services. Survivors, law enforcement, and neighborhood advocates supported stronger penalties aimed at buyers and demand reduction, while criminal-defense and victim-advocacy groups said the bill needed a rebuttable-presumption amendment to better protect trafficking victims. The transcript cuts off before the committee’s final action on SB 1535.