Video & Transcript Research : 'transitional justice'

Page 2 of 500
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • I've said many times that the Department of Justice Justice is at an inflection point.
  • Many Americans feel like the justice system isn't working for them.
  • The Department of Justice stands for justice for all Americans.
  • Thank you for going to the Department of Justice.
  • Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh.
Summary: The meeting covered important discussions surrounding key nominations in the Department of Justice, specifically for the roles of Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights and the Office of Legal Policy. Various committee members took turns to express their views on the nominees, emphasizing the implications of their potential confirmation on civil rights enforcement in the country. Alongside the committee discussion, the nominees provided insights into their professional backgrounds and how their experiences align with the responsibilities of the positions for which they have been nominated.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

State of the Judiciary Address 01-23-2025

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members of the Hawaii Supreme Court: Associate Justice Sabrina McKenna, Associate Justice Todd Eddins
  • , Associate Justice Lisa Ginoza, Associate Justice Vladimir Devens, former Associate Justice Paula Nakayama
  • , former Associate Justice Michael Wilson, former Associate Justice Richard Pollock and Mrs.
  • Second, access to justice.
  • > posed Justice justices answer questions posed Justice justices answer questions posed by<00:
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections Apr 30th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am representing myself and Lioness Justice Impacted Women's Alliance.
  • I'm with the Texas Center for Justice and Equity.
  • I'm the Youth Justice Policy Director, and I strongly support HB 3618.
  • I am with the Alliance for Safety and Justice, representing them and myself.
  • And that's It's not justice; it's punishment beyond what the law already imposed.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 11th, 2026 at 05:25 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Oh, the third-party administration transition.
  • Justice should not expire before someone is ready to speak.
  • Justice should never expire. And I hand it over to my expert. Mr.
  • It also includes persons involved in the juvenile justice or criminal justice system who are at least
  • It proceeds through the criminal justice system.
Bills: SB41, SB153, SB165, SB261, SB264
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections Mar 26th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Registered as Justin Martinez, the Latino Justice, PRLDEF.
  • I'm the Justice Advocate Coordinator for the Southwest Region with Latino Justice.
  • I respect and hear their call for justice and accountability and the need for solutions to prevent future
  • Nelson and help them fight for justice when individuals commit horrific acts like this and take people's
  • HB2341 simply authorizes the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to grant the diligent participation
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections Mar 26th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chief of Operations, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, as a resource witness.
  • House Bill 2017 will help victims like the Davis family seek justice by establishing...
  • Registered as Justin Martinez, Latino Justice, PRLDEF, and yourself.
  • I am the Justice Advocate Coordinator for the Southwest Region with Latino Justice PRLDEF.
  • for a family that can't otherwise get that justice.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 2/24/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • She asked how much of the fiscal impact noted on the materials is assumed to transition to county responsibility
  • assumed<01:14:39.840> that<01:14:40.080> it<01:14:40.239> will<01:14:40.560> transition
  • <01:14:41.120> down<01:14:41.920> to assumed that it will transition down to assumed
  • that it will transition down to the<01:14:42.320> county's<01:14:42.719> responsibility
Bills: HR1
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm pleased to support both. and think that they'll be excellent in their role in the Department of Justice
  • We find in some instances people that have been around the Department of Justice for decades are the
  • behavior that is incompatible with the responsibilities of a U.S. attorney, a role meant to uphold justice
Summary: The committee meeting was focused on the nominations of Brett Shumate and John Eisenberg for significant positions within the Department of Justice. Notable discussions arose over recent public disclosures that questioned the integrity of the nomination process, particularly surrounding Mr. Martin, a candidate whose past comments and associations have raised concerns among committee members. Tensions flared as members addressed potential biases and the implications of Martin’s statements regarding law enforcement and political groups. The meeting concluded with several committee members advocating for more thorough scrutiny of nominations to ensure the integrity of the process.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Bills: HB42, HB125
Summary: The Committee on Higher Education met to hear several bills and first corrected the minutes from its April 1, 2025 meeting to reflect that a committee substitute for HB 271 had been adopted before the bill was reported favorably. The committee then heard HB 3326, which would help Texas higher education employees, especially adjunct faculty, qualify for federal Public Service Loan Forgiveness by counting classroom hours toward full-time status, requiring institutions to verify employment within 60 days, and requiring annual notice to eligible employees. No witnesses testified against the bill, and it was left pending. Members then heard HB 2853, authorizing UTEP to phase in a student union fee increase to fund demolition and reconstruction of its aging student union. Representative Perez and UTEP student and university witnesses said the current facility is outdated and insufficient for a campus of more than 25,000 students, while some members raised concerns about the size of the fee increase and its impact on low-income students. UTEP representatives said most students receive aid, the fee would be phased in over time, and the project was student-approved; the bill was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4066, a one-line bill to abolish the Texas Research Incentive Program after the state cleared its backlog of matching obligations, with the author saying the program was no longer needed in light of newer research funding approaches. The bill was left pending. The committee spent substantial time on HB 125, which would create the Tarleton State University College of Osteopathic Medicine. Supporters, including Tarleton leadership, the founding dean, a rural hospital CEO, and a feasibility consultant, argued the school would address severe rural physician shortages by recruiting Texas and rural students, training them in rural settings, and developing new residency slots rather than competing for existing ones. Members asked about affordability, residency placement, and whether the school would draw students from rural Texas; Tarleton said it would seek to keep tuition and debt low, had already raised private donations, and would request $25 million in state support over the biennium. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard HB 42, which would increase the annual Higher Education Fund appropriation and adjust its allocation methodology. The chair and university witnesses described rising deferred maintenance, inflation, cybersecurity needs, and enrollment growth at HEAF-eligible institutions, with witnesses from Texas Tech, Sam Houston State, and UNT saying the additional funding would help address aging facilities and technology needs. After testimony, the committee left HB 42 pending and recessed.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • The motto of the United States Department of Justice is in Latin, but it says for who Lady Justice prosecutes
  • I love the Department of Justice.
  • Department of Justice stood by and let that happen.
  • While you were at the Department of Justice, you received a Department of Justice Award for superior
  • two tiers of justice.
Summary: The meeting focused on the nominations of Todd Blanch and Gail Slater for the positions of Deputy Attorney General and Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, respectively. The committee considered the qualifications of both nominees, with opening statements provided by the nominees themselves. There was an evident emphasis on the rigorous vetting process that nominees undergo before their selection, highlighting the importance of the roles within the Department of Justice. Members of the committee engaged in a structured question-and-answer session to further evaluate the nominees' capabilities and fit for the positions they were nominated for, with each member allotted seven minutes to pose questions.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice (Part II) Feb 12th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Committee of Criminal Justice will now come, it will be reopened.
  • Good Social Science and criminal justice pre-law at St. Edward's University.
  • So what truly is justice?
  • As a student, we learned that justice should be impartial, fair, and should do no harm.
  • What happened to the presumption of innocence that our justice system is built on?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections Apr 30th, 2025 at 08:04 am

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I’m with Texas Center for Justice and Equity.
  • I'm the Texas State Director for Alliance for Safety and Justice.
  • And that's not justice, it's punishment beyond what law already imposed.
  • And that's not justice, it's punishment beyond what law already.
  • And that's not justice, it's punishment beyond what law already imposed.
Summary: The Corrections Committee first took up pending business and reported several previously heard bills favorably to the full House, including HB 1515 and SB 2405, the TDCJ Sunset bill and its Senate companion, HB 5639 on the veteran housing program, HB 2854 on hospital visits as a parole or mandatory supervision condition and related hospital liability, and SB 1080 on occupational licenses for people with criminal convictions. The committee also heard and advanced SB 1080 without amendment, then moved into new business. A major portion of the meeting focused on HB 3618, which would limit invasive group strip searches of female inmates in TDCJ facilities. Formerly incarcerated women and advocates testified in support, describing humiliation, trauma, barriers to programming, and arguing that searches were often ineffective and that contraband more often comes from staff. TDCJ’s resource witness said the agency has looked at technology such as millimeter scanners and is in the process of placing them in facilities, while the bill sponsor said the measure would preserve searches in emergencies and require female officers when women are unclothed. HB 3618 was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4515 on expanding orders of nondisclosure, with the author saying the committee substitute would narrow the bill to marijuana possession only; supporters from Alliance for Safety and Justice and Right on Crime argued it would improve reentry and public safety, while members asked about eligibility and related offenses. HB 1826, requiring depression screenings for pregnant and postpartum incarcerated women, drew support from women’s health advocates and formerly incarcerated witnesses; the bill was left pending. HB 1969, to help people leaving prison renew or obtain driver’s licenses, and HB 2708, expanding nondisclosure eligibility for certain misdemeanor convictions, were also laid out and left pending. Later, the committee heard HB 2729, which would bar hearsay evidence in hearings on violations of release conditions, and SB 1021, which would make stalking convictions ineligible for community supervision and add related victim-protection provisions; both were left pending. SB 1610, addressing civil commitment facility safety, sex offender registration, and penalties for assaults on staff, drew strong opposition from civil commitment residents, family members, and civil rights advocates who argued it was punitive and raised due process concerns; the resource witness said assaults had increased and explained the civil commitment process and existing legal safeguards. Finally, HB 4764 would require TDCJ to report detailed annual data on restrictive housing; supporters said the bill would improve transparency around solitary confinement, and the committee left it pending before adjourning.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

PBS Public Hearing - Wed Feb 11, 2026 @ 8:30 AM HST

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Task Force 85 recommended that we bring our people home, and so did the Native Hawaiian Criminal Justice
  • The benefits of requiring substance abuse, mental health, or work programs include a gradual transition
  • First up, we have comments from the Hawaii Association for Justice in person.
  • First up, we have comments from the Hawaii Association for Justice in person. No testimony.
  • While we can appreciate the intent of this bill, which is to transition temporary exempt positions to
Bills: HB1769
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 1769, which would require the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to incrementally reduce the number of people incarcerated in private out-of-state correctional institutions. The DCR director opposed the bill, saying the department does not control overall prison population levels because courts determine admissions, and arguing that Hawaiʻi’s in-state facilities are already over capacity, especially Halawa, which he said is 165% over design capacity. He said only a small portion of the population is under departmental control through furlough programs and argued that bringing people home would require building a new medium-security prison. Supporters, including the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission, the Public Defender’s office, and several individuals, argued the bill creates a phased, accountable path to reduce reliance on mainland prisons and bring people home. Supporters emphasized the harms of separating incarcerated people from ʻohana and culture, the disproportionate impact on Native Hawaiians, and the need for diversion, treatment, re-entry support, and fair sentencing. Several testifiers also said the department has more control than it claimed, pointing to underused furlough options, reclassification, and empty beds at some in-state facilities, while others urged clearer statutory language and guardrails. Members questioned the director about whether people could be reclassified or moved to available beds at facilities such as Kulani and Waiawa, and about whether the department could do more through staffing and contract changes. The director said some proposals had been sent to the Department of Human Resource Development, but that major facility changes would be costly and that minimum-security facilities would need substantial upgrades to house medium-security inmates. After discussion, the chair said the committee would defer HB 1769 to Wednesday, February 18, 2026, at 11:30 a.m. for decision-making and adjourned the meeting.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • While there, you gained an understanding of how the Justice Department works for.
  • I recall when there was a demonstration outside the home of a Supreme Court justice.
  • The disintegration of an independent Justice Department before our very eyes.
  • He clerked for Chief Justice Clarence Thomas from 2003 to 4.
  • The Justice Department is currently defending the Trump administration.
Summary: The committee meeting primarily involved discussions around key nominations and pressing legal issues pertaining to the Department of Justice. Notable discussions included the nomination of John Eisenberg for assistant attorney general for national security, where concerns over the revival of the China Initiative were raised. Senators expressed significant apprehensions regarding previous actions taken under this initiative and its implications for national security. Additionally, there were critiques of the broader implications of executive actions that challenge judicial authority, aligning with ongoing dialogues about the integrity of the judiciary and executive oversight.