Transcript Highlights:

• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Wednesday, March 5, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact]
• [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact
• ] [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact
• ] [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact
• ] [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact] [inaudible / transcript artifact

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Housing Committee met on March 19 for a brief public hearing on two bills. SB 79 SD1, relating to historic preservation reviews, drew support from HHFDC, DLNR/SHIPY, and NAOP Hawaiʻi, with NAOP recommending a technical amendment to ensure applications submitted to the department are complete and accurate. No opposition or questions were raised during the hearing. The committee also heard SB 170 SD2 HD1, relating to the expeditious redevelopment and development of affordable rental housing. Testimony was generally supportive, including from HHFDC, Hal Māhu, Pacific Commercial Realty, KCOM Corporation, the Green Party of Hawaiʻi, the Maui Chamber of Commerce, and several individuals, with one person testifying in opposition. Supporters emphasized the need to speed affordable housing redevelopment, especially for Lahaina fire victims, displaced residents, workers, and people experiencing homelessness. A KCOM representative described proposed technical amendments to avoid special-law concerns and to clarify that a permit in process with the county should be sufficient if an emergency proclamation expires before completion. In decision-making, the committee voted to pass SB 79 SD1 with amendments and to pass SB 170 SD2 HD1 with substantial amendments. For SB 170, the chair described amendments to incorporate Pacific Commercial Realty’s proposed changes, clarify application-completeness requirements, exclude shoreline- and erosion-impacted parcels, remove references to flooding and tsunami, clarify an exemption from HRS 343 for certain permanently affordable multifamily projects in the SMA on historic properties, and move the bill’s provisions into statute. Representatives Cochran, Kagawa, and Peric were excused on the vote. The hearing then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.] [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.]
• [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.] [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.]
• [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.] [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.]
• [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.] [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.]
• [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.] [No discernible speech; transcription artifact.]

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Finance Division 2 hearing took testimony from the director of New Hampshire Police Standards and Training on the agency’s budget request and operations. He described the agency’s role in setting hiring, education, certification, and discipline standards for police, corrections, probation and parole, and court security officers, and noted that the agency runs the full-time, part-time, corrections, and court security training programs. He also outlined the agency’s staffing, facility, and budget request for FY 2026-27, including a request to keep funding level with the governor’s recommendation while shifting funds to support an IT manager position by defunding a vacant administrative slot. The agency requested several statutory changes in Chapter 106, including clarifying the definition of police misconduct, allowing a temporary member on the Conduct Review Committee, clarifying reporting requirements for misconduct allegations, and codifying the Law Enforcement Accreditation Commission. The director also reviewed new responsibilities added in recent years, including crisis intervention training, statewide accreditation, the Conduct Review Committee, and increased annual in-service training requirements. He explained that crisis intervention funding is carried in a continuously appropriated, non-lapsing account and that some budget lines were reclassified, including software and janitorial services, to reflect actual spending needs. Members asked about national standards, the different academy tracks, crisis intervention funding, maintenance and contract changes, temporary positions, and the court security training program. The agency said it coordinates with national peers through IADLEST, that the part-time and corrections academies are longstanding programs, and that the new court security academy can be delivered either as a full academy or as in-service training depending on resources. The director also said the agency has been running extra full-time academies because of high vacancy rates, but expects to return to three full-time academies this year, with two corrections academies and one or possibly two part-time academies. He also explained the current approach to misconduct records and public disclosure, saying sustained findings under RSA 106-L are heard by the council and published, replacing the older, less standardized exculpatory list process.

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 749, which would require high schools to provide at least one hour of instruction on the nature and history of communism. The prime sponsor said the bill was prompted by concerns that students lack basic historical knowledge about communism and its effects, and argued that a short, flexible requirement could be embedded in an existing course without creating a new full class. He described communism as a totalitarian ideology and cited historical examples including the Soviet Union, Cambodia, Vietnam, the Cold War, and current events involving Russia, Ukraine, and Taiwan as reasons students should understand the topic. Members asked whether the subject is already covered in current social studies standards, whether one hour is enough, and whether the bill would apply to public, private, parochial, and charter schools. The sponsor said he did not believe communism is specifically required in current standards, that he would prefer a full course but was proposing a minimal requirement, and that he intended the bill to apply broadly to schools under the Department of Education’s umbrella, though he acknowledged the wording may need clarification for charter schools. He also said the proposal was both reactive and proactive, based on anecdotal concerns and his teaching experience. A second supporter testified that he was born in the Soviet Union and favored the bill, but suggested the instruction should emphasize critical thinking and explain both why communism can appeal to some people and why it can have harmful consequences. No vote or final committee action was taken during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
• artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
• artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
• artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
• artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible / empty transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible / empty transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible
• / empty transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible / empty transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible /
• empty transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible / empty transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible / empty
• transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible / empty transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible / empty transcript
• : "e"] [Unintelligible / empty transcript segment: "e"] [Unintelligible / empty transcript segment: "

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Legislative Management Committee met on Wednesday, February 5 at 2 p.m. and heard testimony on four bills. HB 640, relating to child welfare, received testimony from State Ombudsman Robin Matsunaga, who stood on written testimony. HB 792, relating to government services, HB 875, relating to tourism, and HB 1425, relating to the legislature, had no additional in-person or Zoom testimony beyond submitted support or comments. In decision-making, the committee amended and advanced HB 640, removing funding and training requirements, keeping reporting requirements with a clarified definition of the complaint relationship, retaining notice to families of the right to complain to the Ombudsman, and deleting the appropriation. HB 792 was also amended, with the date deferred, and passed with the chair’s recommendation adopted. HB 1425 received technical amendments for clarity, consistency, and style, along with a deferred date, and was passed with amendments. HB 875 was not advanced; the chair said the measure was well-intended but that a different approach was needed to restore tour guides at the state capitol, and announced it would be deferred indefinitely. For the measures that were voted on, the chair and vice chair voted aye, no nays or reservations were recorded, and the committee adjourned after adopting the recommendations.

Transcript Highlights:

• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard a presentation from the University System of New Hampshire chancellor on the system’s budget, enrollment, finances, workforce role, and response to federal policy changes. The chancellor said the governor’s recommended budget would reduce university system funding by about $16.5 million over the biennium, or roughly 8.3%, and asked that state funding be held at the governor’s level. She described planned cost reductions already underway, including lower headcount, reduced benefits and retirement contributions, property sales, and lease reductions, and said the system expects to remove about $20 million from its cost structure in fiscal year 2026. A large portion of the discussion focused on enrollment and finances. The chancellor said fall 2024 enrollment was about 23,000, with New Hampshire enrollment increasing for the first time since 2013, and noted that the system remains a major workforce pipeline, with about 3,000 graduates entering the state workforce each year. She explained that net tuition has fallen over time because of declining enrollment and increased financial aid, while research grants and contracts have grown significantly. She also walked through endowment funding, explaining that payouts are based on a 12-quarter rolling average and are intentionally smoothed to reduce volatility; members asked for follow-up information on payout comparisons, administrative salaries, headcounts, and compensation per student. Members questioned the university about the relationship between state support, tuition, endowments, and research spending. The chancellor said the system has used state capital support to leverage major investments, including the UNH Life Sciences building, Plymouth’s Hyde Hall, and the Olson Advanced Manufacturing Center, and described partnerships with businesses such as Lonza and regional manufacturers. She also explained a long-running New Hampshire 529-related revenue stream that has built endowment support for scholarships, and said the system’s endowment now totals about $988 million. In response to questions about possible cuts, she said the system is considering academic program sharing, consolidation of specialties, online delivery, AI-assisted administrative efficiencies, and footprint reductions, but declined to name specific programs. The committee also discussed DEI-related issues and federal grants. The chancellor said the system is reviewing executive orders and a U.S. Department of Education Dear Colleague letter, and that general counsel is working through websites, programs, and more than 1,200 federal grants to ensure compliance. She said the system spends about $3 million on what it calls DEI-related offices and services, but emphasized that these services include disability support, veteran support, Title IX, ADA, and employment-law compliance, and that the system does not have race-based programs, separate housing, or separate graduation ceremonies. She reported that the system had received stop-work orders on four federal grants totaling about $700,000 and warned that reductions in federal direct or indirect costs could affect research, jobs, and innovation.

Transcript Highlights:

• [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
• artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
• artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
• artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
• artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [No audible speech; transcript artifact.] [No audible speech; transcript artifact.]
• [No audible speech; transcript artifact.] [No audible speech; transcript artifact.]
• [No audible speech; transcript artifact.] [No audible speech; transcript artifact.]
• [No audible speech; transcript artifact.] [No audible speech; transcript artifact.]
• [No audible speech; transcript artifact.] [No audible speech; transcript artifact.]

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing and work session on House Bill 25/25A, the capital improvements budget. Representative David Mills introduced HB 25A, which makes appropriations for capital improvements for the biennium and extends certain lapses from prior appropriations, noting it is based on Governor Ayotte’s budget. The hearing then focused on requests to add or restore funding for several projects, including community college capital needs, Veterans Home ADA and safety upgrades, career and technical education renovations in Milford, and airport infrastructure funding. Shannon Reed of the Community College System of New Hampshire asked for an additional $2.6 million for IT infrastructure, critical maintenance, and energy management systems, citing failing boilers, roof work, cybersecurity needs, and a recent costly water damage incident at Lakes Region Community College. John Graham, representing the New Hampshire Veterans Home, requested $1.5 million for ADA compliance and safety improvements such as floor replacement and wider doors, saying the work would help the home before an upcoming VA inspection and protect federal funding. Lance Whitehead testified for Milford CTE, asking the committee to keep $9.9 million in the budget for a scaled-down renovation; members discussed the town’s failed vote, the need for local matching funds, and the possibility of another vote next year. Tim Thompson of Concord and Margaret Burns of NHMA urged restoration of airport matching funds, arguing that about $3.6 million in state money would leverage roughly $62 million to $65 million in federal FAA funds for safety and infrastructure projects. Trisha Lambert and Andrew Pomroy of the Bureau of Aeronautics and airport management association explained the airport program, the 12 federally funded airports, and how projects are selected through airport master plans and a capital improvement program. After public testimony, the committee closed the hearing on HB 25A. In the work session that followed, staff distributed supporting documents, including cost breakdowns and comparison sheets. The chair indicated the committee would work from the governor’s $143 million capital budget as a baseline and proposed reducing it by about $10 million, largely by removing the Milford CTE item because both towns had voted it down and would not have another vote for a year. The chair said the goal was to bring the overall budget to about $133 million and then repurpose the remaining funds through straw polls and further committee action.

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The meeting included a joint public hearing of the House Housing and Transportation committees, followed by a Transportation Committee hearing. In the joint hearing, members considered SB 662 SD1, which concerned transportation and included two parts: transferring certain streets to the city and clarifying police authority on state streets. The chair recommended moving the bill out as an HD1 with Part One removed, explaining that the street-transfer issue should be worked out by the county and state and that removing it would improve the bill’s chances. The committees voted to pass the measure with amendments, and the recommendation was adopted. The Transportation Committee then heard several bills. SB 1095, relating to license plates, would increase decal size restrictions for special number plates; the Department of Transportation offered written comments, with testimony split between two individuals in opposition and one in support, and no questions were raised. SB 344 would require skateboard users under 16 to wear helmets; DOT supported the bill, as did TRIAA Hawaii, the Injury Prevention Coalition, and other individuals, while two individuals opposed it. SB 30 would require all moped riders to wear helmets regardless of age; DOT supported it, but Moped Doctors and Hawaiian Style Rentals and Sales opposed it, arguing the bill was overreaching, could be hard to enforce, and should be more narrowly targeted or replaced with education efforts. The committee also heard SB 1216, which would tighten noisy muffler and exhaust enforcement by conditioning inspection certificates, adding inspection-station penalties, increasing fines, and prohibiting repair or installation of noisy systems. DOT supported the measure, and Waiʻanae Neighborhood Board testified in support, while Moped Doctors and the Motorcycle Industry Council opposed it, saying the bill would burden inspection stations, create liability concerns, and raise questions about insurance-related language as applied to mopeds. The hearing included discussion of enforcement, inspection burdens, and whether the bill’s insurance references applied to mopeds. No final vote was taken on the Transportation Committee bills in the portion provided, and the hearing adjourned after testimony and discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held an orientation for new and returning members of the House committee on agencies and administration, with introductions from members and staff. Chair Carol Maguire outlined her expectations for hearings: keep questions focused on the bill, be respectful to witnesses, and use the committee’s orientation opportunities to learn about the jail staff, retirement system, and Office of Professional Licensure. Members also discussed related assignments on other bodies, including the Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules and the Joint Committee on Employee Classification, and noted that some members already serve on those panels. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on the State Building Code and the committee’s upcoming workload. Members explained how the state code is intended to provide a common baseline while allowing limited local options, and why municipalities must formally adopt and publish any local amendments. They reviewed several anticipated bills: a consolidation bill to gather building-code enforcement materials in one place, a bill to update the state energy code, a bill to restrict municipal adoption of building-code changes, and a bill to update the electrical code. Members also discussed how building codes apply to older homes and commercial buildings, and why code updates are important for safety and clarity. The chair said the committee had 36 bills currently scheduled, including many early bills that must move by March 6 because they will be heard by two committees. She said the committee would use subcommittees for harder bills, with three subcommittees this year: pensions, licensing, and likely state building code. She also outlined the hearing schedule, including lighter bills on February 12 and the expectation of executive sessions later in the month. No votes were taken during the orientation, but members were told that public hearings do not require a quorum and that hard copies of bills would be distributed by committee staff.

Transcript Highlights:

• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]
• [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.] [No audible transcript content.]

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription
• : "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription: "e"] [Unintelligible transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Water and Land met on March 18, 2025, and heard testimony on several measures related to state funds, public lands, wastewater, port infrastructure, and other land and water issues. Early in the hearing, SB 1395, relating to state funds and climate mitigation financing, drew support from the Governor’s office, the Hawaii Climate Advisory Team, the State Energy Office, and others, while the Tax Foundation of Hawaii urged the committee not to revert to the original version because of concerns about a special fund and compliance with state statutes. After discussion, the chair said the bill would be deferred because of budget uncertainty and the need to preserve reserves, and members agreed to that recommendation. The committee then took up SB 1393, SB 1669, SB 102, SB 1511, SB 1083, and SB 946, among others. SB 1393 and SB 1669 received support or comments from agencies including the Attorney General’s office, the State Energy Office, and other departments; SB 1669 was sent on with amendments and to Finance for further review. SB 102, concerning a third-party review process, prompted questions about who would select consultants and whether the bill would affect staffing and permitting costs; it was advanced with amendments, with one member noting reservations about the shift to private third-party review. SB 1511, SB 1083, and SB 946 also moved forward, generally with amendments or as amended, and several members noted reservations tied to budget impacts or statutory language. The committee also heard testimony on HB 1393, which involved public lands and school facilities, where the Department of Education sought a change to the deletion language and the School Facilities Authority said it stood on its written comments. For SB 146, relating to the Ali Canal, the University of Hawaiʻi and DLNR supported the measure, and a member asked about the estimated annual cost, which was described as $125,000 per year. On SB 946, members discussed whether removing the term “person” could narrow the law too much; after that discussion, the committee agreed to restore the term and proceed with an HD1. The meeting ended with the committee recessing after completing its agenda and adopting the chair’s recommendations on the measures considered.

Transcript Highlights:

• [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription
• / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription artifact: "e"] [Unintelligible / transcription

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Economic Development and Technology heard testimony on several measures, including HB 671 on Native Hawaiian data tabulation, HB 639 on AI chatbot disclosures and consumer protection, HB 1391 on a proposed Hawaii/Irish trade commission, HB 1361, HB 1384 on an AI advisory council, HB 1292, and HB 1308 on online sports wagering. Testimony on HB 671 focused on clarifying how Native Hawaiian categories should be defined for data purposes, with Eugene Tian noting Census data can tabulate Native Hawaiians alone but not those in combination with other races without special tabulation. HB 639 drew support from DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection, which said the bill should advance but may need amendments to align with existing consumer protection law and preserve OCP enforcement authority. HB 1384 received support from ETS, which said an AI advisory council would help establish governance and standards for state AI use. HB 1391 drew comments in support from DBEDT and one testifier who urged a broader U.S./Hawaii/EU framing rather than a bill focused on Ireland. HB 1361 was heard with no testimony in the excerpt, and HB 1292 received support from the Hawaii Community Development Authority and opposition from HGA, which warned the measure could open the door to privatizing or outsourcing government services. HB 1308 drew extensive testimony both for and against, with supporters arguing legalized online sports betting could generate revenue for education, housing, health care, child care, and problem gambling treatment, while opponents raised concerns about regulation, oversight, and the social impacts of gambling. Supporters included BetMGM, DraftKings, and the Iron Workers Stabilization Fund, while the Department of Taxation and Office of Information Practices also provided comments. The committee then moved into decision-making and adopted the chair’s recommendations to pass HB 671, HB 639, HB 1391, and HB 1384 with amendments, while HB 1361 and HB 1292 were deferred. For HB 1308, the chair outlined a substantial HD1 with changes including limiting the bill to internet-connected mobile or digital wagering platforms, shifting regulatory responsibility from DBED to DCCA, adding confidentiality language tied to UIPA, and using committee notes to reference other states’ tax percentages and agency testimony; members discussed the need for guardrails, and one member changed from a no vote to reservations, but the excerpt ends before the final vote is shown.