Video & Transcript Research : 'runoff election'

Page 2 of 447
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Many of you have seen me here before testifying on election integrity bills. and I'll be here for the
  • them, for one thing, they teach me a lot of things. to be the canary in the cave when it comes to election
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 13th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Many of you have seen me here before testifying on election integrity bills, and I'll be here for the
  • For one thing, they tend to be the canary in the cave when it comes to election integrity bills.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 1596, which would remove short-barreled rifles from the list of prohibited weapons in the Texas Penal Code. The author, Sen. Hagenbuch, said the bill would align state law with federal realities and argued that the current prohibition is arbitrary and unnecessary. Supporters, including representatives from Gun Owners of America and Texas Gun Rights, said the bill would reduce confusion, protect lawful gun owners, and preserve the ability to use shorter firearms for self-defense, hunting, and for smaller shooters. One supporter also described a recent case in which an AR pistol was mistaken for a short-barreled rifle and led to a state charge that was later dismissed. Public testimony was split. Supporters said stabilizing braces and shorter firearms can improve accuracy, safety, and accessibility for women, children, and smaller-statured shooters. Opponents, including Texas Gun Sense and two Santa Fe shooting survivors, argued that short-barreled firearms are more concealable and dangerous, and pointed to the 2018 Santa Fe High School shooting as evidence of the risks of easier access. They urged the committee to keep the existing restrictions in place to protect public safety. After public testimony closed, the committee took up pending business. Senate Bill 1505, relating to the Compassionate Use Program, was reported favorably to the full Senate on an 8-0 vote. Senate Bill 17, relating to the acquisition of real property by certain aliens or foreign entities, was first amended by adopting a committee substitute and then reported favorably to the full Senate by a 7-1 vote. The committee then recessed until after the Senate’s adjournment or final recess.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Constitution, Campaigns and Elections Committee Feb 18th, 2026

Constitution, Campaigns and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • They chose to do a runoff election and one candidate received more votes than the other one.
  • So, if there were no other runoff election, this would be a runoff this particular... if it ended in
  • So, if there were no other runoff election, this would be a runoff. >> There would be a runoff this particular
  • That's my bad. >> They ended up going to a runoff and it didn't... the second election did not end in
  • That's my bad. >> They ended up going to a runoff and it didn't... the second election did not end in
Bills: SB42, SB166, SB42, SB166
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 30th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • after federal Election Day to be received up to five business days after election day.
  • I think you have the conclusion of the election on Election Day.
  • day after Election Day.
  • midnight on election night.
  • election, this...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 30th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • He was re-elected in November without an opposing candidate.
  • These are not elections.
  • step towards free and fair elections.
  • Texas Election Code, Chapter 181.061, Parts C and D.
  • They elect at a county convention and then a state convention.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 17th, 2025 at 10:04 am

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • You have the primary, which is in March, and then you have the May election, and then you have the runoff
  • So for that, we had to move the May elections or the runoff elections, which used to be in April, to
  • or any election between those elections.
  • The sub allows voters to use a RID once and a second time only in a runoff election.
  • The sub allows voters to use a RID once and a second time only in a runoff election.
Summary: The committee first voted out two previously heard Senate bills without amendment: SB 688, relating to the date of the meeting of presidential electors, and SB 914, relating to authorizing certain cities to change the date of their general election for officers. Both motions passed on 8-0 votes with one member absent. The committee then heard HB 3909, which would change the current prohibition on wireless device use from a 100-foot boundary around a voting station to only inside the room where voting is taking place, with a committee substitute also adding state-prescribed signage. The author and supporters said the change would reduce confusion and make enforcement easier for election workers, while opponents argued the existing 100-foot rule helps prevent electioneering, recording, and possible technical interference with election equipment. The bill was left pending. Members also heard HB 1968, which would repeal a provision that requires counties to provide election services to certain political subdivisions in odd-numbered years but not even-numbered years, making county-provided election services consistent across years. Supporters said it would improve consistency for smaller cities and school districts, while opponents warned it could strain county equipment and staffing during heavy election cycles. The bill was left pending. HB 2279 would require voter registrars to remove a person from the rolls if the person swears under oath during jury service that they are not a U.S. citizen; supporters said this would streamline removal of ineligible voters, while opponents raised concerns about mistaken identity and loss of due process. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard HB 2803, which would require a presiding judge to give a poll watcher a signed statement explaining any removal from service. Supporters said this would improve documentation and accountability, and one witness asked for clarification that improper removal would remain a criminal offense; the author said he would consider a floor amendment and further discussion. The committee also heard HB 4253, which would create a more uniform voter-roll maintenance process based on inactivity, sending confirmation notices to voters who have not voted in the prior 25 months and eventually removing those who do not respond after multiple election cycles. Supporters said it would clean up outdated records and help keep voters registered where they actually live, while opponents argued it could wrongly remove eligible voters who simply do not vote regularly. HB 4253 was left pending as well.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 17th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • runoff was.
  • So for that, we had to move the May elections or the runoff.
  • . elections or any election between those elections.
  • election security.
  • in our election system.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, whether anything happens or not, I mean, we're, we're inflicting a penalty on the entire elected
  • sessions during certain periods, for example, 60 days after a regular session, 60 days before an election
  • You may recall 2217 was a was a bill that dealt with how we report election results and how procedures
  • They get within the 30 day window before the election. They're already registered to vote.
  • The election administrators brought this to the house because the law was kind of fuzzy before.
Bills: SB 53, SB 54, HB16, SB 19
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 9th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • the election.
  • elections.
  • So you've followed elections, the election process?
  • of election staff, election judges, and election clerks.
  • The election officials and the election...
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, we're inflicting a penalty on the entire elected body by doing this.
  • Rules that the judges are when they run for election or reelection.
  • For example, 60 days after a regular session, or 60 days before an election.
  • It was a bill that dealt with how we report election results and how procedures are conducted.
  • The election administrators brought this to the House because the law was kind of fuzzy before.
Bills: SB 53, SB 54, HB16, SB 19
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Senate Judiciary and Elections Committee is called to order.
  • To prohibit it from influencing elections and election officials. Okay, thanks. Madam Chair? Yes.
  • They don't consider it an election, essentially.
  • the weekend before Election Day.
  • The causal factor of both findings to the 2020 presidential election, when a Republican election denier
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations May 26th, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 202 by Senator Klein-Peter provides for the increase of parish board of election supervisor
  • SB 202, what this does is it adds one additional day for the parish board of election supervisors in
  • In preparation for and in supervising elections, what it will do is increase the maximum number of days
  • for presidential or regularly scheduled or special congressional primary or general elections.
  • I just want to compliment the folks that were working at the polls in this last election.