Video & Transcript : 'judicial procedures' :

Page 2 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • compensation as well as judicial transparency, accountability, judicial compensation as well as judicial
  • First off, you all have judicial conduct that you can't fight back.
  • As an organization, 100% fully behind increase in judicial pay.
  • On the bill, just so I can be consistent as a judicial officer.
  • I can be consistent as a judicial officer.
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met to hear House Bill 1761, a broad judicial package focused on increasing judicial compensation and adding accountability and efficiency measures. The chair explained that HB 1707 and HB 2100 were withdrawn from the agenda, and that HB 1761 would be taken up first because many judges and stakeholders were present. The committee substitute for HB 1761 proposed a 30% increase in base judicial pay to $182,000, changes to judicial retirement linkage, stronger judicial conduct provisions, and efficiency measures such as targeted reporting for judges not meeting benchmarks, appellate in-person meeting encouragement, and time limits on certain motions. The chair and several supporters said judicial pay had reached “emergency status,” citing Texas’s low national ranking and difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified judges. Witnesses in support included presiding and district judges, the State Bar’s judicial section, business and trial lawyer groups, and prosecutors. They emphasized that many judges work long hours off the bench, handle warrants at night and on weekends, manage heavy dockets, and face recruitment problems in both urban and rural counties. Supporters also said higher pay would help attract experienced lawyers, retain judges, and improve court efficiency. Several witnesses and members discussed judicial accountability, including public reporting of court performance and the role of the Texas Supreme Court and presiding judges in setting benchmarks. Some members raised concerns that raw statistics can be misleading because judges also do substantial off-the-bench work and often help cover other courts’ dockets. There was also testimony and discussion about the bill’s conduct and discipline provisions. A representative of the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed parts of the bill that would tie pay raises to changes affecting judicial independence, warning about subjective bail-related discipline standards and possible chilling effects. The executive director of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct cautioned against civil penalties for complainants, saying it could discourage good-faith complaints and create litigation risks. Other witnesses supported accountability reforms but urged caution about unintended consequences, especially for family and emergency cases and for judges handling warrants and other time-sensitive matters. After testimony, the committee withdrew the committee substitute and left HB 1761 pending, then recessed the committee.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 30th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Before 1939, the rules of civil procedure were basically in statute.
  • The legislature adopted the rules of civil procedure as statute.
  • Law that dealt with civil procedure. That was the intent of the bill.
  • Now it just applies to procedural law, but there's not always a fine line between procedural law and
  • Some bills that certainly dealt directly with procedural law.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 3rd, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I did a procedural error. I'm going to back up just for a second.
  • All the bill would do is put that same procedure in place for election TROs, where they would notify
  • bill doesn't deal with the causes of action or the remedies, all it does is create an additional procedure
  • that they're not a citizen when they get one of our new voter rolls through our voter maintenance procedures
  • counted unless they cure the ballot by verifying their citizenship following currently established procedures
Committee: House Elections
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • prohibit courts from declaring a statute unconstitutional, nor can it prevent individuals from seeking judicial
  • But these efforts to evade judicial review only emphasize how deep... discriminatory this bill is.
  • If you cannot speak with any moral authority, you don't get to choose who and when people get procedures
  • Judicial administration. That's Senate Bill 17. Are there questions from the committee?
Bills: SB6 , SB7 , SB8 , SB11 , SB12 , SB13 , SB15 , SB 6 , SB 7 , SB 8 , SB 11 , SB 12 , SB 13 , SB 15 , SB 17 , SB6 , SB7 , SB8 , SB11 , SB12 , SB13 , SB15 , SB17
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • However, the Code of Criminal Procedure does not currently address this issue. require the trial court
  • I think it may be necessary to be said that criminal justice, criminal procedure, and criminal cases
  • In other words, there's accountability for judicial restraint, but no accountability for judicial excess
  • The bill ensures that sequestration is used judiciously, reducing unnecessary burdens on our courts.
  • HB 5465 is an omnibus bill as well, and this is for the Texas Judicial Council on Mental Health.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • In 2013, the Texas Legislature enacted Article 11.073 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, commonly referred
  • for all denials, and that only fosters inherent consistency, transparency, and public trust in a judicial
  • Fourth and finally, HB 115 eases procedural bars that prevent courts from considering the merits of these
  • You need judicial authority of a judge who's actually a lawyer unless it's a really small town.
  • You need judicial authority of a judge who's actually a lawyer unless it's a really small reserve for
Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • procedure that every Justice of the Peace court can use in any JP court under our rules of civil procedure
  • So based on procedural grounds, that tenant who has not paid rent...
  • It presents a substantial and concerning departure from fair legal procedure and established state procedural
  • It is one of the oldest judicial proceedings that exists.
  • These procedures in Texas are pretty much in the mainstream.
Bills: HB32 , HB15 , HB171 , HB421 , HB581 , HB644 , HB745 , HB349 , HB917 , HB204 , HB923 , HB15 , HB171 , HB204
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Procedures and deadlines for the jury trial waiver and an independent director of certification.
  • Thank you for allowing me to lay out House Bill 917. 2A.105 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
  • Article 28.105 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that county attorneys shall not be of
Bills: HB32 , HB15 , HB171 , HB421 , HB581 , HB644 , HB745 , HB349 , HB917 , HB204 , HB923 , HB15 , HB171 , HB204
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Jan 21st, 2026

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so, how does this stop judicial activism?
  • 51.520><c> on</c><00:49:52.000><c> pages</c><00:49:52.960><c> page</c><00:49:53.280><c> nine</c> Um, judicial
  • And so, how does<00:52:06.000><c> this</c> does this does this stop stop stop um<00:52:10.480><c> judicial
  • </c><00:52:12.480><c> Because</c><00:52:12.720><c> that's</c><00:52:12.960><c> a</c> um judicial activism
  • Because that's a um judicial activism?
Bills: SB61 , SB8 , SB58 , SB60 , SB167 , SB61 , SB8 , SB58 , SB60 , SB167
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Apr 15th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's 672 pages and not Not really looking at the procedural path, not so much the path for analysts or
  • This is the section that follows, so procedurally, that's why we didn't have to raise any suspension
  • So very much procedurally sound.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • involved will know that every session we have the omnibus courts bill, and that deals with general judicial
  • Because the judicial pay raise bill passed, their pay has increased. ...and said that was too much money
  • For 46 months, there's been a case on appeal just... ...an anti-SLAPP motion, procedural things that
  • with miscarriages claiming lives in numbers much larger than the very few lost due to abortion procedures
  • of us daily and have met our requirements to be licensed in our state, that this is not a medical procedure
Bills: SB10 , SB16 , SB6 , SB 6 , SB 10 , SB 16
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Feb 11th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • 46:09.280><c> that</c> hearings and things that follow that hearings and things that follow that procedure
  • 10.640><c> saying</c><00:46:10.800><c> that</c><00:46:11.040><c> is</c><00:46:11.280><c> there</c> procedure
  • I'm just saying that is there procedure.
  • I want to say, but I think the bar association and the judicial inquiry committee looked at this and
Bills: HB348 , HB106 , HB347 , HB54 , SB118 , SB167 , SB195 , HB260 , HB263 , HB328 , HB348 , HB106 , HB347 , HB54 , SB118 , SB167 , SB195 , HB260 , HB263 , HB328
Committee: Senate Judiciary
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Mar 24th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • There is a lot of judicial abuse.
  • without a valid reason, yet there are many incidents where individuals lose their children due to judicial
  • Because in my incident, judicial abuse was used again and my...
  • be a limitation where this person isn't just holding that basically over their head. abuse in the judicial
  • case, in Boyd, the court stated that the purpose of the statute is to provide an expedited... ...procedure
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 24th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • things that are inappropriate, couldn't She did you know if she filed a complaint with the Office of Judicial
  • I understand that there's all sorts of pressures under our judicial system.
  • So while I don't want to minimize the trauma and abuse and the abuse of procedures to weaponize and hurt
  • Senate Bill 1618 directs each judicial district to utilize the scientifically verified pretrial risk
  • The pretrial risk assessment, there are a few judicial districts that utilize it.
Committee: Senate Judiciary