Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial district'

Page 2 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence (Part I) Apr 9th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judges from 8 years to 6 years prevent visiting judges from practicing in their assigned judicial region
  • If it's uncontested, if it's contested, then it can go into the district court free.
  • Senate Bill 1734 creates a legal process allowing property owners to seek judicial determination that
  • the citizens because there's no filing fee to have it, have the to have this petition heard by a district
  • Consult with our county or district attorney, but in a lot of instances you have someone in a lot of
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Finance May 11th, 2026

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Right now, the rate increase on average will be around $4,000 a judicial district.
  • And then I have a few registrars of voters here from my district and from other districts.
  • Fisher, HB 559, increases court costs for the Fourth Judicial District. Good morning.
  • Fisher, HB 559, increases court costs for the Fourth Judicial District.
  • Increases court costs for the Fourth Judicial District. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We are opposed to some middle ground solutions the Texas Judicial Council has proposed.
  • And so in 2020, the Texas Judicial Council had a recommendation to the legislature to adopt some kind
  • App, Houston, 14th District, 2015.
  • Lifts appointed by certain district courts in Webb County.
  • Only two of the four district courts in Webb County can appoint their respective full-time bailiffs.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I've been in Chairman Meyer's district for 30 years.
  • What this bill would do is allow district and county attorneys.
  • To the county attorney and district attorney.
  • criminal district attorneys to report relevant information to the Council.
  • It asks for a collaborative process for the Texas Judicial Council to work.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • the writing assignment, and then give districts the ability to.
  • Meaning, right now districts have to formally request a re-score.
  • So when almost 30% of districts or students that are rescored at a price to the district have scores
  • Districts have to pay $50 for that rescore. It's a demonstration.
  • What the bill sets up, districts will no longer have to request rescores.
Bills: HB8
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because I saw your districts over...
  • A lot of districts do. Not exclusively, but a lot of districts can use D.A.R.
  • What we have now are districts—some whole districts, giant districts—choosing to keep their kids either
  • I'm looking at the largest districts.
  • that have either the entire district or parts of their district...
Bills: HB8
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So when almost 30% of districts or students that are re-scored at a price to the district have scores
  • Districts have to pay $50 for that re-score.
  • Districts have to pay $50 for that re-score.
  • That's the of the, so 400 districts choose.
  • What would have happened to those school districts?
Bills: HB8
Summary: The House Committee on Public Education met to hear House Bill 8, which would replace STAAR with a new assessment and accountability system beginning in the 2027-28 school year. The chair described the bill as reducing testing time, limiting benchmark tests, adding beginning-, middle-, and end-of-year assessments, requiring faster score turnaround, involving Texas teachers in test development, and tightening accountability timelines and transparency rules. Members also discussed provisions on A-F ratings, cut scores, CCMR, local accountability plans, and TEA reporting requirements. Committee members and invited witnesses split sharply on the bill’s approach. Supporters, including the chair, TEA Commissioner Mike Morath, and Ed Trust’s Nicholas Munyon Penny, argued the bill would reduce high-stakes pressure, provide quicker and more actionable data, limit over-testing, and better align assessments to Texas standards while preserving criterion-referenced accountability. They said the new system would help teachers and parents intervene sooner and would improve transparency, including parent access to student responses and automatic rescoring in some writing cases. Opponents, including Rep. Hinojosa and student witness Ella Moran, argued the bill still increases testing and replaces one high-stakes test with multiple TEA-created tests. Moran testified that STAAR creates anxiety, disrupts instruction, and does not reflect real learning, while Hinojosa said the House had previously passed a better bill based on a nationally norm-referenced model and criticized the new proposal as a concession to the Senate. Questions also focused on AI scoring of writing, rescoring rates, and whether the bill’s new accountability rules would be reliable and fair. The committee did not take a final vote during the portion provided, but the chair said a vote on HB 8 would be called after public testimony later in the day.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • judges from eight years to six years, prevent visiting judges from practicing in their assigned judicial
  • If it's uncontested, if it's contested, then it can go into the district court free.
  • If it's contested, then it can go into the district court free.
  • Senate Bill 1734 creates a legal process allowing property owners to seek judicial determination that
  • Albeit, we do have the ability to consult with our county or district attorney, but in a lot of instances
Summary: The committee heard several probate, family law, judicial, property, and contract-related bills. Senate Bill 1335, relating to decedents’ estates, would remove outdated references to a clerk’s certificate, allow courts to remove personal representatives on their own motion with notice by qualified delivery method, and add independent administrators to provisions that referenced only independent executors; an estate-planning attorney testified in support, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1760, concerning guardianship transfer fees and procedures, was described as setting a $45 filing fee for transferred guardianship cases and clarifying completion and dismissal procedures; it received no testimony and was left pending. Senate Bill 2127 would shorten the eligibility period for retired judges to serve as visiting judges from eight years to six, restrict practice in their assigned region for two years, and require conflict-related certification; it also was left pending without testimony. Senate Bill 302 would shift the cost of a traveling probate judge to the requesting estate or parties rather than the county; one witness registered in favor, no one testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then considered a committee substitute for Senate Bill 252, which would clarify the parental presumption in conservatorship cases, require non-parents seeking relief against a parent to file an affidavit showing significant impairment to the child if relief is denied, require courts to state specific findings when overcoming the presumption, confirm the clear-and-convincing standard, and clarify that agreed prior orders do not defeat the presumption. The substitute was explained as consensus language from a work group, public testimony was reopened, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1734, on deed fraud, would create a streamlined ex parte process for property owners to have fraudulent deeds declared void, modeled on the fraudulent lien statute; county clerk and title association representatives testified that it would provide a low-cost self-help remedy for a growing problem, and the bill was left pending subject to the chair. Senate Bill 1975 would prevent Texas contractors from being forced to litigate disputes in foreign jurisdictions and require disputes to be handled in the county where the project is located; it was presented as a repeat of a previously vetoed bill and was left pending. Finally, the committee took up a substitute for Senate Bill 1940, concerning transfer-on-death style beneficiary designations for manufactured homes. The substitute would allow one or more beneficiaries instead of only one, transfer the interest to surviving designated beneficiaries who survive by 120 hours, extend the application period for transfer to 365 days, void the designation if not timely filed, and require mailing by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested. The substitute was adopted without objection. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Ways & Means Mar 10th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Local school districts and how much will be sent back to the state and recapture.
  • Districts and how much money is going back to the state in the recapture payments.
  • name for local school district operations.
  • The school district adds all of the information under that school district currently. Perfect.
  • It could be a form they ask the school district to submit.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 21st, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Board prior to the issuance of permits or permit amendments by certain groundwater conservation districts
  • Additionally, SB1 mandates districts to post, update, and maintain a website listing youth camps with
  • Counties in my district, members, Southeast Travis County, Caldwell, and Guadalupe County were impacted
Bills: SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, SB 1, HB4, HB4, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, SB1, SB2, SB5
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 29th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • districts.
  • It before on the earlier bill, they are not the same across all of these judicial districts.
  • The Orleans judges and the number of judges per capita is still fewer than 12 other judicial district
  • I have about 10 historic districts in my district alone.
  • I have about 10 historic districts in my district alone.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I think it can be everything from a district, to a transportation district, to a water district, to an
  • District 33?
  • districts and communities of interest to Republican districts.
  • District 13.
  • Senate District 18, Senate District 9 was cracked.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • in that district could have been.
  • We talked about it earlier when you said you didn't know whether which district or what other district
  • is a packed district.
  • District number, is it? This would be Congressional District 27. I'd have to look and see.
  • My Your senatorial district? Yes. Your senatorial district.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Three of those districts are Congressional Districts 28, 15, and 34. are drawn in a way that makes them
  • A majority in one district in which Hispanic voters constitute a majority to target these districts,
  • National District 29, which has stood as a performing Latino majority district, is dismantled.
  • This mid-districting, or this re-districting, it's just a tactic and another assault.
  • Once again, you're re-districting.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5