Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial approval'

Page 2 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/5/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • The minutes are approved.
  • and our lease costs at the judicial and our lease costs at the judicial center<00:04:20.320>
  • safety and security for our judicial safety and security for our judicial officers<00:05:14.800>
  • There are five judicial officers.
  • that we make in in the judicial branch. that we make in in the judicial branch.
Bills: HF3874, HF3875, HF3378
Summary: The committee approved the March 3 minutes and then heard a presentation from the Minnesota Judicial Branch on House File 3874, which was laid over for possible inclusion in a finance bill. State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba and Chief Judge Michael Fritz testified in support of a supplemental funding request focused on judicial branch safety and security, along with funding to cover the employer share of Minnesota Paid Leave costs. Shorba said the branch is seeking help because it did not receive funding for paid leave in the last session and is having to hold positions open to absorb the cost. The safety and security request included five parts: personal data protection for judges and court administrators, home security, two additional staff positions for threat assessment and coordination, security for the chief justice at public events, and a revived courthouse security grant program for counties. Testimony emphasized rising threats and incidents involving judges and court staff, including examples of doxing, home surveillance, and threats involving litigants, and cited increases in reported incidents, threats, and disturbances. Fritz said the branch’s current response system is stretched and that more law-enforcement-trained staff would improve coordination and response. Members questioned why the judicial branch should receive state funding for paid leave when private employers must absorb the cost, and Shorba responded that the branch was excluded from end-of-session funding decisions and that the mandate should be funded for all branches of government. Members also asked about the threat-response process and whether local law enforcement should be used more directly. Another concern raised was whether State Patrol troopers assigned to judicial security would have the training needed for criminal-code enforcement, and Shorba said the branch is discussing that issue with the State Patrol. No vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • committee substitute adds current and former employees and commissioners of the State Commission on Judicial
  • I am the general counsel for the Commission on Judicial Conduct.
  • I serve on the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, and I too want to express my appreciation to Senator
  • So that provision allows court staff, or clerk staff, or Judicial Conduct Commission staff to use their
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Bill 383 accomplishes the original intent of the bill without expanding the authority of the PUC to approve
  • The substitute also removes the judicial remedies that require the tenant's rent to be paid into the
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Injunctions and long, drawn-out judicial proceedings are preventing that from happening. ...not attempt
  • A potential solution to counter implicit bias in our judicial system is implicit bias training.
  • Did you just say that the Texas Judicial Council recommends that the implicit bias...
  • Well, we want our judicial system to be fair and impartial.
  • Studies consistently demonstrate that implicit biases affect judicial decisions.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It represents real threats and dangers that are judicially... system and the public face daily.
  • Furlow, here for yourself and the 106th Judicial District, and you are against the bill.
  • Jennifer Lundy I show you as with Texans for judicial accountability and you are against the bill.
  • would they need the approval to file an appeal?
  • It's going to change judicial rules or judicial financial interest or special interest in many . . .
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, February 20, 2026

Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, so, [clears throat], it's rule making for local approval and conditions and revocation, judicial
  • and conditions and revocation approval and conditions and revocation judicial<00:02:34.400> review
  • The county commission approves it.
  • conducted grants its approval. conducted grants its approval.
  • denials or revoke revoking approvals. denials or revoke revoking approvals.
Bills: SF0045, SJ0001
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial Conduct.
  • And then the Attorney General has to approve that contract.
  • General has to approve that contract.
  • Judicial personal identifying information by data brokers.
  • And so the threshold for needing a new court is judicial time.
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial Conduct.
  • And then the Attorney General has to approve that contract.
  • I’m the General Counsel for the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.
  • So the threshold for needing a new court is judicial time.
  • And so the threshold for needing a new court is judicial time.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It came out of, you know, Judicial Council and consultations with a number of these courts.
  • For 2022, we had 57% of our receiverships approved with no action on 31%.
  • For 2023, 45% of our receiverships were approved with no action on 48%.
  • And for 2024, we had 41% of our receiverships approved with no action on 58%.
  • I must approve alternate service.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial salaries have also been an issue that the...
  • Council for the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.
  • This year, I am also the chair of the Judicial Section of the State Bar of Texas.
  • Because the judicial section is an organization encompassed within the.
  • So judicial pay plays into the democratic process and the true cure for our weakness in the judicial
Bills: SB260, SB263, SB293, SJR18
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial education on elder abuse is essential to ensure informed, compassionate, and effective legal
  • determine the proper allocation of funds and specify that statutory probate court judges are paid out of judicial
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Government, Elections And Indian Affairs Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:36 am

House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am a judge at the Second Judicial District Court in the family division.
  • Madam Chair, House Bill 95 is to create a 31st district judge position in the Second Judicial District
  • “If we had a fifth judicial officer to be able to help carry the load and process the cases, I believe
  • “And I think we should have the fifth judicial—excuse me, the fifth judge added for family court.
  • So with that, Madam Chair, I'd just like to make a motion for approval. I'll second it.
Bills: HB70, HB93, HB95, HB139, HB140, HJR4
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • In all 50 states and offer state-approved notary education in many states.
  • It could take up to 270 days to get that approved.
  • This bill addresses the lack of actionable prosecution data by requiring the Texas Judicial Council to
  • It asks for a collaborative process for the Texas Judicial Council to work.
  • A mandate in the bill, it is rather the bill sets up a process by which the Texas Judicial Council will
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Seeing none, Vice Chair Hayes moves that Senate Bill 2052, without amendments, be approved and reported
  • Yes, the Texas Judicial Commission on mental health, chaired by Justice Jane Bland, of which Speaker
  • Members, this SJR deals with the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, which is created to protect. .
  • Thomas, I have you here on behalf of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, registered on the bill
  • I'm the General Counsel for the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judicial Retention - 2025-03-20 - 10:30AM

Vermont Senate Floor Meeting