Video & Transcript Research : 'interest cap'

Page 2 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Aug 22nd, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's no cap on that.
  • So when you cap or cut us, you're not...
  • Interesting.
  • This bill caps the rate at which...
  • Capping further reduces the cap that cities and counties are allowing.
Bills: HB17, HB23, SB 10
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:02:56.879> around aligning the various interests around aligning the various interests
  • should be amended to put this lower cap should be amended to put this lower cap so<00:08:26.960>
  • <00:09:18.000> With next year, a more restrictive cap.
  • With next year, a more restrictive cap.
  • have shorter terms and higher interest have shorter terms and higher interest rates.<00:42:08.800
Bills: HF4234, HF484, HF483, HF2614
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on Disease Prevention & Women's & Children's Health Mar 20th, 2025

S/C on Disease Prevention & Women's & Children's Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so it's just any interest because it was 3% if you own that much of a food company, that is a whole
  • rather than the best interests of the people for the people.
  • How do we keep, if we do it in Texas, how do we prevent those conflicts of interest?
  • That really goes to the depths of the conflicts of interest on all of this.
  • This is why I have it here and it's, this is what I'm talking about with the conflicts of interest.
Bills: HB25, HB38
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/11/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • We'd like to uh testify on interesting.
  • > federally<00:34:27.040> also business interest changes federally also business interest
  • related to how the business interest related to how the business interest deduction<00:34:45.440
  • in taxation EBIT to earnings interest in taxation EBIT to earnings before<00:38:51.040> interest<
  • 30% limit on business interest. 30% limit on business interest.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • those watching at home, the Intergovernmental Affairs bills for discussion today: For all those interested
  • Now, when we're talking about 4% and 9% tax credits, 60% AMI is the cap.
  • There's no rent growth; it's capped.
  • I actually was interested, and obviously you believe that the program helped you.
  • The substitute also removes the cause of action in the interest of time. ...legislation.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 22nd, 2025

State Affairs

Bills: HB223
Summary: The Committee on State Affairs heard several House bills, with most measures left pending after testimony and later taken up in a batch of votes. Early in the meeting, HB 5624 on liability protections for motocross/off-road vehicle tracks, HB 223 on requiring competitive procurement for municipal lobbying contracts, HB 3709 on post-election audit procedures, and HB 5081 on protecting personal information of judicial officers and court staff were all discussed and left pending after testimony. Witnesses on HB 223 supported greater transparency in municipal lobbying contracts. HB 3709 drew sharp opposition from an election integrity advocate who argued the bill would reduce precinct-level granularity and make it harder to detect ballot errors, while a Secretary of State resource witness said the bill would simplify and standardize the audit process by location. HB 5081 received strong support from court administration and a district judge who described prior threats and an attack tied to publicly available personal information. The committee also heard HB 3546 on allowing school districts to move elections to November, HB 493 on barring certain felony offenders from serving as poll watchers, HB 5115 on increasing penalties for election fraud and related conduct, HB 4081 on trade secret filing procedures, HB 3909 on limiting restrictions on wireless devices at polling places, HB 2702 on limiting gubernatorial closure authority for certain veterans organizations during pandemics, HB 119 on foreign adversary lobbying, and HB 5138 on the Attorney General’s authority to prosecute election crimes. Several of these bills were explained with committee substitutes and then left pending before final action. Testimony on HB 493 and HB 5115 came from an election integrity advocate who supported both bills, saying the poll watcher restriction was appropriately narrowed and that the election fraud bill would help address invalid votes and refusal to count valid votes. Later, the committee took up pending business and voted out a large number of bills, generally along party lines or with broad support. HB 186 on minors’ social media use, HB 229, HB 2885, HB 3909 as substituted, HB 4285, HB 1661, HB 2820, HB 3181, HB 4157, HB 223, HB 521, HB 640, HB 1234, HB 2253, HB 2294, HB 3053, HB 3697 as substituted, HB 4281, HB 4463, HB 4995, HB 5081 as substituted, HB 5624 as substituted, HB 119 as substituted, HB 3225, HB 5138 as substituted, HB 5115, HB 481 as substituted, HB 3546, HB 493, and HB 4145 were reported favorably to the full Senate, with several also placed on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted committee substitutes for multiple bills, including HB 3909, HB 5081, HB 5624, HB 119, HB 5138, and HB 481. At the end, the chair noted another committee meeting would likely be needed before deadlines, possibly on a weekend, and recessed the committee subject to the call of the chair.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Transportation Apr 3rd, 2025 at 10:00 am

Transportation

Bills: HB1053
Summary: The committee took up House Bill 1298 and first discussed an amendment from Senator Paulson that would add variable electronic speed limit signs to the bill while leaving the 80-mile-an-hour provision unchanged. Members said the signs would be used on interstates I-29 and I-94 in selected problem areas, based on weather or accident conditions, and that the proposal would not require a fiscal note. The discussion then broadened to Senator Rummel’s concerns about related bills, especially 2243, 1250, and 1229. He argued that the House changes were removing municipal authority to double fines, lowering or eliminating points for serious traffic violations, and undoing prior Senate positions. Several members said they were willing to use HB 1298 as the vehicle to restore the earlier fine and point provisions, including the 29 violations previously assigned three points, and to avoid concurring with the House versions. Members did not take final action on the amendments or the bill. Instead, they agreed more work was needed and asked Legislative Council to prepare a combined amendment and options for the next meeting. The committee recessed and scheduled further discussion for the next morning.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • cap at 105,000 cases, and I don't really understand why.
  • The caps are the problem. That's the issue with it. I'm sorry.
  • That says we've got to put a cap on that. But we have the other part here.
  • The caps then are a little bit different concept, of course.
  • I just don't think we can achieve that with a single cap. ...anguish.
Bills: HB223
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Tax, Business and Transportation Feb 5th, 2026 at 04:18 pm

Senate Tax, Business & Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • With respect to the interest rate cap, again, that interest can be carried forward.
  • We're open to the cap.
  • The credit, as proposed, has a cap of $500,000 per taxpayer per year, and an aggregate annual cap of
  • The credit, as proposed, has a cap of $500,000 per taxpayer per year, and an aggregate annual cap of
  • An aggregate annual cap of $10 million.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 4th, 2026 at 10:04 am

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Okay, interesting. So our statute for MRAs requires, Mr. Chair, that they be in full form.
  • There's no fiscal impact, because when we set up the statute, we put 30 million a year as a cap.
  • we still won't reach that cap.
  • We had a cap of 6,000 a year for individuals to receive, and we moved that to 15,000.
  • I don't know if there's one in the House, but I'm still interested in this.
Bills: SB101, SB58, SB55
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development Committee Feb 4th, 2026

Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • What we did last year, we added $2 million to the existing $20 million cap, and that $2 million is held
  • Plus, my information was already on my husband's economic interest form with the exception, of course
  • Plus, my information was already on my husband's economic interest form with the exception, of course
  • Plus, my information was already on my husband's economic interest form with the exception, of course
  • In 1993, municipal candidates did not have to file an economic interest statement.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Commerce Committee Meeting - 2025-03-27

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first is around a defunct mortgage maximum interest rate.
  • The maximum interest rate is the maximum interest rate that the government can charge for certain types
  • is the maximum interest rate that...
  • Oh, there is a maximum interest rate, and under the setup right here, that interest rate is a prime alpha
  • This is really an interesting bill.
TX

Texas 89th 1st C.S.

Local Government Aug 1st, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I just thought that was interesting.
  • I just thought that was interesting.
  • And the cap is 20,000 above that.
  • All right, well, we'd be well above your cap. Okay, all right. All right. Interesting.
  • It's not a hard cap.
Bills: SB9
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met to hear Senate Bill 9, which would lower the voter-approval tax rate for certain local taxing units from 3.5% to 2.5%. Sen. Bettencourt, the bill author, argued the change would continue the state’s property tax reforms begun in 2019, slow local levy growth, and give voters more say over larger tax increases. He and supporters cited data showing property tax levies have grown faster than population plus inflation, and said the bill would help protect taxpayers while preserving the state’s broader investments in school tax relief, water, rural law enforcement, and ambulance funding. Supporters included the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, the Texas Association of Business, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the Texas Association of Manufacturers. They said the bill would improve transparency, encourage more disciplined budgeting, and create certainty for homeowners and businesses. They argued that lower tax-rate growth would help attract and retain employers and investment, and that voters would still be able to approve higher rates when needed. Local officials and other opponents said the bill would constrain cities and counties facing rapid growth, inflation, infrastructure needs, and public safety costs. Testimony from county judges, city finance officials, firefighters, and urban county representatives emphasized pressures from jail operations, roads, water, EMS, police and fire staffing, and unfunded mandates. Several witnesses asked for carve-outs or exemptions for public safety and disaster-related costs, warning that a one-size-fits-all cap could force service cuts or shift costs elsewhere. The committee heard extensive questioning but no final vote or disposition on the bill was taken in the portion provided.