Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal responsibility'

Page 2 of 500
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Apr 22nd, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, House Bill 2189 by Representative Howard is in response to our growing healthcare workforce
  • The goal is to ensure students understand what government government bodies do, who's responsible for
Bills: HB178
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Curran, this is one-time money that doesn't go into the tails and trying to be fiscally responsible,
  • <00:36:23.359> responsible<00:36:24.560> and<00:36:24.800> so trying to be fiscally
  • responsible and so trying to be fiscally responsible and so that's<00:36:25.680> one<00:36:25.920
  • <01:05:03.760> fiscal<01:05:04.160> note maybe lessening the fiscal fiscal note maybe
  • of the fiscal note has not said that. of the fiscal note has not said that.
Bills: HF3874, HF962
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EEP Public Hearing - Tue Feb 3, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Energy & Environmental Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • um, you know, we call palo money, and the crumbs can play a crucial role in the environmentally responsible
  • um, you know, we call palo money, and the crumbs can play a crucial role in the environmentally responsible
  • um, you know, we call palo money, and the crumbs can play a crucial role in the environmentally responsible
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures related to waste, recycling, and environmental review. On HB 1924, which would establish a mattress stewardship program, the Department of Health said it stood on written testimony and offered comments, while Hawaii Reef and Ocean Coalition and one individual supported the bill and the International Sleep Products Association opposed it. No questions were raised and the committee moved on. A large portion of the hearing focused on HB 2121, which would prohibit the sale of disposable vapes in Hawaii. The Department of Health supported the measure but suggested the bill may be better placed in a different part of state law because the cited waste-management section regulates products after consumption, while still praising the effort to remove disposable vapes from the market and environment. Testimony in strong support came from the Coalition for Tobacco Free Hawaii Youth Council, Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii COPD Coalition, Hawaii Health and Harm Reduction Center, the City and County of Honolulu, and many individuals; supporters emphasized youth vaping, toxic waste, lithium battery fire risks, and environmental harm. There was at least one opposing individual and the International Sleep Products Association was listed in opposition. The committee noted there were many written testimonies and no immediate vote was taken. The committee also heard HB 1928 on the deposit beverage container recycling program. The Department of Health stood on written testimony. The Solid Waste Task Force of Hawaii Environmental Change Agents and Upstream supported the bill but urged amendments to better integrate reuse and reusables, strengthen enforcement, clarify definitions, and protect existing redemption centers. The Hawaii Food Industry Association supported the concept of a backdrop program but preferred strengthening the existing program and raised concerns about undefined fees, existing infrastructure, and future audit costs. The Chamber of Commerce Hawaii supported the bill, and the chair said the measure needs work and that decision-making would occur in a few days. Finally, the committee took up HB 979 on environmental review and HB 1650 on environmental assessments. For HB 979, OPSD offered amendments, HCDA supported the bill but suggested clarifying the affordable-housing definition, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative supported it, and Earthjustice was asked about the court process for environmental challenges; the chair asked about shortening the challenge period and the relationship between environmental court, the intermediate court of appeals, and the Supreme Court. For HB 1650, OPSD and the State Historic Preservation Division stood on written testimony, OHA asked to retain historic sites, and several groups and individuals testified in support or opposition. Opponents argued that removing Wiki special district and historic sites from Chapter 343 trigger language would weaken environmental review and risk impacts to iwi kūpuna and historic resources.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Phoenix certainly hasn't been on a budget diet either; from fiscal year 23 to 26, Phoenix's total all-funds
  • The example he's asking you about, which I would like a response to, is the exact reason why this bill
  • But that responsibility belongs to individuals themselves and to parents.
  • It will really, it will be, it will make government less responsive and less accountable to citizens.
  • I don't know if there's been a fiscal note, but we deeply need to consider that issue.
Summary: The committee approved the February 4, 2026 minutes and held SB 1571 until the following week. It then heard and advanced several measures, beginning with SB 1745, which would cap transaction privilege/excise tax rates in the state’s largest cities at 2.5% per classification unless approved by voters, and would allow enforcement through the attorney general and state-shared revenue withholding. Supporters argued it would protect taxpayers and restrain municipal tax increases; the bill received a technical amendment and a due pass recommendation. The committee also advanced SB 1686, renaming Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza as the Wesley Bolin and Charlie Kirk Freedom Plaza and authorizing memorial placements for Don Bowles and Charlie Kirk, after brief supportive discussion and no substantive opposition testimony. The committee spent substantial time on SB 1567 and SB 1435, both aimed at restricting public entities, schools, and libraries from exposing minors to sexually explicit materials and from using public facilities for sexually explicit filming or access. Supporters framed the bills as child-protection measures and cited examples of explicit books and materials in libraries and schools; opponents, including the ACLU, warned the definitions were broad, could chill speech, and could criminalize librarians and educators for handling constitutionally protected literature or sex-education materials. Both bills were amended and passed on 4-3 votes, with supporters emphasizing existing obscenity standards and opponents stressing First Amendment concerns and implementation problems. The committee also advanced SB 1433 and SB 1434, which would redraw Maricopa County boundaries and, in the latter bill, create three new counties with a transition board and staggered elections. The sponsor argued Maricopa County had become too large and politically dominant, making government less representative and less responsive; opponents called the proposals expensive, disruptive, and politically motivated, citing concerns about debt division, duplicated county systems, and fiscal impacts. Both bills received due pass recommendations on 4-3 votes. Finally, the committee approved SCR 1024, requiring legislators to live in their district for one year before election, and SCR 1025, moving the legislative session start date from the second Monday to the fourth Monday in January; both resolutions passed unanimously or near-unanimously after sponsor testimony that they would modernize outdated rules and improve use of time.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

State Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, as many of you know, our main role is fiscal oversight.
  • Chair and members, Helen Roberts from the House fiscal staff.
  • I have not requested a fiscal note on this bill.
  • I can only speak from my experience, but I think for fiscal analysts, we will request a fiscal note for
  • So we request fiscal notes in advance.
Bills: HF627, HF474, HF361, HF1837
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, so as many of you know, our main role is fiscal oversight.
  • that a committee chair can request a fiscal note.
  • this<00:53:56.760> bill requested a fiscal note on on this bill requested a fiscal note
  • > for that we will request a fiscal note for that we will request a fiscal note for any<00:54:
  • <00:54:15.319> note any member that requests a fiscal note any member that requests a fiscal
Bills: HF627, HF474, HF361, HF1837
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Juvenile Justice Mar 26th, 2025

S/C on Juvenile Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Texas is one of only three states that treats 17-year-olds as adults for criminal responsibility.
  • The fiscal notes that have been attempted to look at this in the past have been significant.
  • Later, in 2019, the fiscal impact of Representative Dutton's previous bill was projected to be over $74
  • I have thousands of cases that I am responsible for, oftentimes involving a 17-year-old.
  • House Bill 2234, as you know, addresses the age of criminal responsibility.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Juvenile Justice Mar 26th, 2025

S/C on Juvenile Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • probation departments, are having to travel a significant amount of time while often being the agency responsible
  • without facilities, are having to travel a significant amount of time while often being the agency responsible
  • Representative Louderback, in response to your question, I'm not aware that the judges have taken a position
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • The House is not responsible for your spotty internet connection.
  • c><00:19:20.960> House<00:19:21.120> is<00:19:21.280> not<00:19:21.440> responsible
  • Uh the House is not responsible permits.
  • Uh the House is not responsible for<00:19:22.160> your<00:19:22.480> spotty<00:19:22.880
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'd love for you to teach a fiscal responsibility class to some of these other cities. Thank you.
  • The chair here calls Andrew McVeigh, testifying himself, taking his fiscal responsibility.
  • For fiscal responsibility, and I am here in support of House Bill 46.
  • Standing within the guidelines that have been set forth, we are very fiscally responsible.
  • We've received awards for fiscal responsibility.
Bills: HB26, HB73, SB 14, HB46
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/5/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • response responses or the individual response responses or the individual judge<00:14:24.079>
  • have likely reduced hours of investigation and a faster threat response.
  • <00:19:29.039> until investigations uh resp uh response until investigations uh resp uh response
  • faster threat response. faster threat response.
  • component to this as well, and the fiscal component doesn't get discussed.
Bills: HF3874, HF3875, HF3378
Summary: The committee approved the March 3 minutes and then heard a presentation from the Minnesota Judicial Branch on House File 3874, which was laid over for possible inclusion in a finance bill. State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba and Chief Judge Michael Fritz testified in support of a supplemental funding request focused on judicial branch safety and security, along with funding to cover the employer share of Minnesota Paid Leave costs. Shorba said the branch is seeking help because it did not receive funding for paid leave in the last session and is having to hold positions open to absorb the cost. The safety and security request included five parts: personal data protection for judges and court administrators, home security, two additional staff positions for threat assessment and coordination, security for the chief justice at public events, and a revived courthouse security grant program for counties. Testimony emphasized rising threats and incidents involving judges and court staff, including examples of doxing, home surveillance, and threats involving litigants, and cited increases in reported incidents, threats, and disturbances. Fritz said the branch’s current response system is stretched and that more law-enforcement-trained staff would improve coordination and response. Members questioned why the judicial branch should receive state funding for paid leave when private employers must absorb the cost, and Shorba responded that the branch was excluded from end-of-session funding decisions and that the mandate should be funded for all branches of government. Members also asked about the threat-response process and whether local law enforcement should be used more directly. Another concern raised was whether State Patrol troopers assigned to judicial security would have the training needed for criminal-code enforcement, and Shorba said the branch is discussing that issue with the State Patrol. No vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.