Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal analysis'

Page 2 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Health and Welfare May 26th, 2026

Health and Welfare

Transcript Highlights:
  • Everyone, please remember this analysis... All right, members, thank you for being here.
  • So there would still be a fiscal note of roughly $500,000 to this.
  • So there would still be a fiscal note of roughly $500,000 to this.
  • financial accounting, the cost-benefit analysis, and all of the description.
  • And just so everyone realizes, too, there is a fiscal note.
Bills: HR290, HR298, SB405, SCR61, HR318
NV

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections May 29th, 2025 at 01:00 pm

Legislative Operations and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • My question is not fiscal, but I am going to use a fiscal note for clarification on the 3rd... ...not
  • fiscal, but I am going to use a fiscal note for clarification on the explanation of DMV's fiscal note
  • We're neutral on this bill, but we do have a fiscal note on it, as mentioned.
  • So that's primarily what our fiscal note is about.
  • We have a zero-impact fiscal note on the DMV. We are neutral on SB 74.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 8th, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • year billion during fiscal year billion during fiscal year 2024.
  • flight school, and we're going civilian flight school, and we're going to make it flight schoolwide in fiscal
  • to make it flight schoolwide in fiscal to make it flight schoolwide in fiscal year 26. year 26. year
  • new and is projected to welcome 120 new and is projected to welcome 120 new warrants by the end of fiscal
  • year 25, a warrants by the end of fiscal year 25, a warrants by the end of fiscal year 25, a first since
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 8th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • You can look at the fiscal note of almost $10 million. And in fact, it grows the bureaucracy.
  • El Paso electric was going to go forward and do this that they We would undertake a cost-benefit analysis
  • So the amendment makes that cost-benefit analysis something they have to do, not something they can't
  • make sure that... we're going to do our due diligence to make sure that there's a good cost-benefit analysis
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 8th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Additionally, this change has no fiscal impact.
  • The term "analysis" is not defined in...
  • I just need an analysis—blow on the phone, blow on a piece of paper.
  • There were some questions asked earlier about the type analysis.
  • House Bill 2282 is about fairness, fiscal responsibility, and public... ...safety.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • We provide analysis of how programs are performing, whether they're performing the way that you intend
  • We provide analysis<00:22:28.960> of<00:22:29.120> how<00:22:29.360> programs<00
  • :22:29.840> are<00:22:30.000> performing, analysis of how programs are performing, analysis
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This did not come with a fiscal note.
  • Yes, your neighbor, fiscally conservative.
  • For fiscal responsibility, and I am here in support of House Bill 46.
  • year and the current fiscal year.
  • We've received awards for fiscal responsibility.
Bills: HB26, HB73, SB 14, HB46
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Ways & Means

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so, in any fiscal year where OSPB or JLBC determines that the change to our revenues is going to
  • It just requires the governor to do an analysis, evaluate whether the governor thinks we need to have
  • up: we already have ways to call a special session, and we already can request reports and ask for fiscal
  • do adjust for inflation, we're about collecting as much individual income tax revenue as we did in fiscal
  • So I'm looking at the JLBC monthly fiscal highlights from January 2020, where they themselves note this
Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 2780, a technical cleanup measure related to Arizona’s judicial tax lien foreclosure and excess proceeds process. The sponsor and a witness said the bill clarifies when a court should order a public sale, standardizes distribution of sale proceeds, and corrects inconsistencies left from prior reforms. No opposition was raised, and the committee approved HB 2780 unanimously on a 9-0 do pass vote. The committee then took up House Bill 4029, which would require the Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee to evaluate the revenue impact of federal tax conformity changes earlier in the process, and would require the Department of Revenue to issue tax forms consistent with statute. An amendment was adopted to have OSPB and JLBC each make the evaluation and to require a governor’s report if the impact is $100 million or more, along with new reporting deadlines for DOR. Supporters argued the bill would force earlier action on conformity and prevent tax forms from diverging from statute; opponents said it added bureaucracy and could delay filing. The committee approved HB 4029 as amended by a 5-4 vote. The committee also heard House Bill 4030 and the related HCR 2052, both aimed at limiting local tax and fee increases. HB 4030 would bar municipalities and counties from adopting, imposing, or collecting increased fees, transaction privilege taxes, and utility rates from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2030. The sponsor said the measure was intended to protect taxpayers from inflation and rising local costs. Cities, counties, and utility representatives opposed the bills, warning they would hinder infrastructure financing, water and wastewater projects, road improvements, and public safety services, and could force general fund subsidies or delayed maintenance. Supporters argued local governments have seen substantial revenue growth and should be restrained from further increases. The committee did not reach a final vote on HB 4030 or HCR 2052 in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/5/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • year 27 for salary increases for fiscal year 27 for our<00:04:30.800> staff<00:04:31.120>
  • component to this as well, and the fiscal component doesn't get discussed.
  • So, there's a fiscal and a staffing impact here for us. Thank you for that.
  • <01:18:00.000> Um,<01:18:00.400> this kind of prepayment analysis.
  • Um, this kind of prepayment analysis.
Bills: HF3874, HF3875, HF3378
Summary: The committee approved the March 3 minutes and then heard a presentation from the Minnesota Judicial Branch on House File 3874, which was laid over for possible inclusion in a finance bill. State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba and Chief Judge Michael Fritz testified in support of a supplemental funding request focused on judicial branch safety and security, along with funding to cover the employer share of Minnesota Paid Leave costs. Shorba said the branch is seeking help because it did not receive funding for paid leave in the last session and is having to hold positions open to absorb the cost. The safety and security request included five parts: personal data protection for judges and court administrators, home security, two additional staff positions for threat assessment and coordination, security for the chief justice at public events, and a revived courthouse security grant program for counties. Testimony emphasized rising threats and incidents involving judges and court staff, including examples of doxing, home surveillance, and threats involving litigants, and cited increases in reported incidents, threats, and disturbances. Fritz said the branch’s current response system is stretched and that more law-enforcement-trained staff would improve coordination and response. Members questioned why the judicial branch should receive state funding for paid leave when private employers must absorb the cost, and Shorba responded that the branch was excluded from end-of-session funding decisions and that the mandate should be funded for all branches of government. Members also asked about the threat-response process and whether local law enforcement should be used more directly. Another concern raised was whether State Patrol troopers assigned to judicial security would have the training needed for criminal-code enforcement, and Shorba said the branch is discussing that issue with the State Patrol. No vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26

Higher Education Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, we are process of the fiscal note.
  • Has anybody done the net analysis of what that looks like?"
  • Has anybody done the net analysis of what that looks like?"
  • Has anybody done the net analysis of what that looks like?" "Mr.
  • net analysis of what that looks like? net analysis of what that looks like?
Bills: HF4266
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/02/2026 - House Health & Human Services

Health & Human Services

Summary: The House Committee on Health and Human Services heard and advanced four Senate bills. SB 1242 would allow courts to conduct mental health evaluation and treatment hearings, or specified testimony in those hearings, virtually by telephone or video if the court finds no unfair prejudice; a speaker said it would codify existing practice and help avoid dismissals caused by technical issues. SB 1145 would transfer licensure and regulation of behavior analysts from the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners to the existing Behavior Analyst Committee, with supporters saying it would improve efficiency and eliminate unnecessary board ratification delays. Both bills received due pass recommendations on 11-0 votes, with one member absent. The committee also considered SB 1247, an emergency measure allowing a person who does not receive care services to live with a resident in an assisted living center or home if the facility permits it. Supporters said the bill would clarify a recent statutory interpretation and preserve longstanding arrangements, such as spouses or other companions living together; one member raised concerns about the bill’s broad wording and potential fraud or safety issues, while another noted facilities could still impose background checks or other conditions. SB 1247 passed with a 10-0 recommendation, with one member voting present and one absent. Finally, SB 1023 would set standards for optometrists’ eye examinations, including a recommended one-year exam interval and authority to extend eyeglass prescription validity up to two years depending on patient factors. The Arizona Optometric Association supported the bill as codifying best practices, and one member said a constituent from the blind community had helped bring the issue forward. The committee gave SB 1023 a due pass recommendation on an 11-0 vote, then adjourned.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Healthcare Committee Mar 17th, 2026

Healthcare

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have two separate bills because it's going to transcend two separate fiscal years, and we won't be
  • transcend monies because it's going to transcend two<00:14:02.079> separate<00:14:03.120> fiscal
  • years<00:14:05.279> and<00:14:05.519> and<00:14:05.920> we two separate fiscal
  • years and and we two separate fiscal years and and we won't<00:14:06.399> be<00:14:06.560>
Bills: SB367, SB368, SB350, SB351