Video & Transcript Research : 'course levels'

Page 2 of 500
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

TRS-LBT, TRS Public Hearings 03-19-2026

Transportation

Summary: The joint hearing of the Transportation and Labor and Technology committees considered HB 2097, which would allow administrative driver’s license revocation hearings to be held by interactive conference technology such as Zoom and permit electronic exchange of evidence. DOT and the Administrative Driver’s License Revocation Office supported the bill, saying Zoom hearings have worked well since 2021 and save time and money. Both committees passed HB 2097 with technical and nonsubstantive amendments. The Transportation Committee then heard HB 1163 on commercial driver licensing, HB 2113 on funding vegetation removal from the Kaola Stream drainage way, HB 2283 on port pilotage, HB 1588 on a noise detection camera program, and HB 2333 on airport special districts and aeronautics penalties. DOT asked for HB 1163 to use “non-domiciled” language to match federal rules, and the committee passed it with amendments. For HB 2113, the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity said the project would likely need about $1 million, and the committee passed the bill with amendments while noting the funding would be reflected in the committee report rather than the measure itself. HB 2283 drew broad support from maritime and labor interests, but the committee deferred it, saying the Senate version was already moving and would be used instead. HB 1588 received support from DOT and several community and health-related testifiers who said noise from traffic is a serious problem, but the committee expressed concern about enforcement language and re-referred the bill to Judiciary/Ways and Means while still passing it forward. HB 2333 was supported by DOT and airline interests; after questions about airport loitering and sleeping rules, the committee passed it as is. In the final decision-making, the committee adopted the chair’s recommendations on HB 1163, HB 2113, HB 1588, and HB 2333, and deferred HB 2283.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education 2ND REVISED Apr 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • It was dealt with at the site level. I could believe that. Further questions?
  • We wanted to give school districts the flexibility to allow at the local level approved courses... that
  • That curriculum has very high-level math and science in it.
  • or you can't approve that course.'
  • , just at the school district level.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2025-04-02

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Of course, I will say, as I said yesterday, that Members are going in and out with other places they
  • Most of those changes relate to ensuring the same level of protection that exists for tribal medical
  • What is my course of action to protect my health and my happiness in my apartment?
  • This also clarifies how Commerce shares summary-level information publicly while confirming that if individual
  • Section two outlines the classification of company data under chapter 13 and allows for summary-level
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 4/2/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • What is my course of action to protect my health and my happiness in my apartment?
  • What is my course of action to protect my health and my happiness in my apartment?
  • What is my course of action to protect my health and my happiness in my apartment?
  • What is my course of action to protect my health and my happiness in my apartment?
  • What is my course of action to protect my health and my happiness in my apartment?
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • polarizing, controversial topic for parents, athletes, coaches, and administrators at the high school level
  • There are, of course, corrosive aspects of money being introduced in proximity to athletes. ...introduced
  • adopted by our membership, we must ensure we avoid the mistakes that are being made at the collegiate level
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

House in Session Apr 16th, 2025

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • HAPPENING ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL RIGHT NOW.
  • That is important to many others, but of course, they are also economic drivers.
  • Members, if we could keep the noise level down a little bit.
  • A DISASTER AND CREATING COMPLETE CHAOS AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.
  • And retain the power at the local level. Representative, you are recognized.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 16th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And that income level is capped.
  • What is the maximum income level?
  • And, of course, star tests.
  • HB number 1022 by Morales of Maverick relating to the... course levels offered at Sul Ross State University
  • Yes, of course. She does. Freshman Fairway, does this bill... create nanny state? Of course not.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Finance May 27th, 2026

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, however, TOPS is only for full-time students, which is, of course, anything above 12 hours
  • It could be one course. Yes, ma'am.
  • It would be, however, the cost would be based on the credit hours, of course. Okay.
  • even people that have the intention to do it with the full load are not always able to stay at that level
  • And of course, it would be hard to come here.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 24th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It allows that, upon sentencing, inmates become level two and can only earn 22 credits per month.
  • Upon sentencing, if they become Level 4, they can earn 44 credits per month, and upon reception, have
  • This bill would allow, upon a sentencing, the inmates to come in at level 4.
  • What does It counts as far as benefits and eligibility for parole if it goes to level 4.
  • But if we want to, I'll ask LC to come in and list the levels of credits, Mr. Chairman.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education May 6th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So these associate-level practitioners are just by.
  • The responsibilities properly lay at that level.
  • It's creating more levels of authority?
  • and very well in other courses.
  • . courses.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • more information, like an AIS or an RLS, or an archaeological inventory survey or a reconnaissance-level
  • I think we feel that the state needs both for-sale housing and, of course, rental housing.
Summary: The committee first took up HB 2611, which would prohibit algorithmic price-setting in Hawaii’s rental market, require public education by the Attorney General, and establish fines and penalties. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill, saying its language was too unclear and could expose landlords and agents to criminal and civil liability for ordinary rent-setting practices based on public information or assistance from property professionals. Members asked about antitrust standards, tacit agreement, and whether using county-published affordable-rent schedules would be unlawful; the AG said that would not be unlawful if based on public information and without collusion. Testimony was mixed, with the chair noting support from the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, Hawaii Realtors with comments, 50501 Hawaii and General Strike Hawaii, Haloha Project, 13 individuals, and one opponent. The committee then heard HB 2102, which clarifies that residential projects involving ground disturbance in high-risk areas remain subject to state historic preservation review and removes an exemption for lands presumed nominally sensitive. The Office of Planning and Sustainable Development and the Department of Planning and Permitting supported the measure, saying it would improve clarity and ensure review focuses on projects most likely to affect historic properties or iwi kupuna, while also urging language refinements to better define sensitive sandy-soil areas and balance preservation with housing timelines. NAP Hawaii opposed the bill, arguing it would undo progress made last session and that the current process already includes protections for inadvertent discoveries and efficiency for lower-risk areas. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs strongly supported HB 2102, explaining it was responding to beneficiary complaints about late-added language in last year’s law and saying the nominally sensitive-area language should be removed because it was adopted without sufficient stakeholder input and could be harmful to iwi kupuna protections. Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation and several individuals also supported the bill. Committee discussion focused on how “nominally sensitive” areas are determined, whether project proponents could self-certify areas as exempt, and how high-density residential projects should be treated; SHPD said it uses survey and monitoring data to map sensitivity, that highly sensitive areas like Kīauea are not nominally sensitive, and that some high-density projects should remain exempt if they do not involve new ground disturbance. The hearing included no final vote in the portion provided, but the chair noted 48 individuals in support and continued questioning on the bill’s definitions and implementation.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • The language, of course, as we We're speaking, it's limited to you have to have five facilities to qualify
  • I can't actually speak to why it's in this title, but of course, just from an anecdotal perspective,
  • to committee or were in the oversight committee, we talked about should we raise the cap to another level
  • there are some tests that are available that can at least help in some instances to determine what the level
  • After that brilliant poetic display from the sultan of sunsets, who has leveled up in so many ways, are
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Of course, we all understand sovereign immunity.
  • And of course, you know the commission has seven members, right? And they're different types.
  • Wouldn't there be a more national push at the corporate level to be doing this?
  • We are already regulated, as you guys have discussed, at the federal level and at the state level by
  • Senator Kolkhorst, of course, is already back.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • that were discussed and agreed to in a stakeholder process in a stuffy room in the basement over the course
  • Uh, how have they leveled the playing field? Sure.
  • So the question that we have at a higher level is what is this bill trying to solve?
  • It's an industry that is heavily regulated at both the state and national levels.
  • And then at the state and local level, or at state and national level too, you can't ignore the impact
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce (Part II) Apr 1st, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • How have they leveled the playing field?
  • So the question that we have at a higher level is: what is this bill trying to solve?
  • And then at the state and local level, or at state and national level, too, you have to—you can't ignore
  • And then at the state and local level, or at state and national level, too, you have to, you can't ignore
  • that, And then at the state and local level, or at the state and national level, too, you have to—you
Summary: The Senate Committee on Business and Commerce heard Senate Bill 2021 by Senator Johnson, as substituted, on distributed energy resources (DERs). Johnson said the bill was intended to create a regulatory framework for DERs and virtual power plants, address interconnection and registration issues, and prevent regulatory capture as the industry grows. Testimony was split: Texas Electric Cooperatives asked for clarification so co-ops would not be unintentionally excluded from owning or operating DERs; AECT supported the bill as providing needed rules and customer protections; TABA, Texas Solar and Storage Association, Sierra Club, Texas Solar Energy Society, and several others opposed it or raised concerns that it was too utility-centric, imposed red tape, and could burden homeowners and small businesses with registration and interconnection requirements. Johnson repeatedly said the bill was not meant to stop rooftop solar or backup systems and that he was open to specific redlines and further changes. SB 2021 was left pending after testimony. The committee then took up Senate Bill 2330 by Senator Parker, which would end government payroll deduction for dues to certain public employee organizations, while exempting first responders under Chapters 143 and 147 and making other conforming changes in a committee substitute. Parker argued the bill was about government neutrality, transparency, and employee freedom from coercion, and said organizations can collect dues directly using modern payment methods. Supporters from Texas Public Policy Foundation, Texas Business Coalition, Freedom Foundation, ABC Texas, and Texans for Fiscal Responsibility said taxpayer-funded payroll systems should not be used to collect dues for private organizations, especially ones involved in political activity. Opponents, including ATPE, Texas Classroom Teachers Association, Texas Public Employees Association, and correctional employees, said payroll deduction is a convenient, secure service that helps professional associations and employee groups, and argued the bill would burden teachers and other public employees. Several witnesses and senators focused on the bill’s exemptions and whether it treated teachers differently from first responders. Senator Menendez questioned why some public employees were excluded while others were not, and a Houston police union representative said he moved from opposing to supporting the bill after being told the substitute would preserve meet-and-confer deductions under Chapters 143 and 147. Senator Parker closed by saying the bill was not meant to eliminate associations or payroll deduction entirely, only to remove the state as a middleman. SB 2330 was left pending, and the committee then recessed subject to call.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce (Part I) Apr 1st, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Of course, under these one-sided contracts, what happens?
  • Of course, we all understand sovereign immunity.
  • Wouldn't there be a more... ...more national push at the corporate level to be doing this?
  • We are already regulated, as you guys have discussed, at the federal level and at the state level by
  • And this is something that can be done at a municipal level.
Summary: The committee first took up pending business and favorably reported several bills without objection or by recorded vote, including SB 783, SB 1238, SB 1706, SB 1791, SB 458, SB 1644, and SB 1810, with some of them also sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then moved into hearings on additional bills. SB 1968, by Senator Schwertner, would update the Real Estate License Act by repealing subagency, requiring written buyer-agent agreements before showings, and clarifying when a formal buyer representation agreement must be signed. Texas Realtors testified in support, saying the bill modernizes agency rules and increases transparency, while a committee substitute corrected drafting issues. SB 2411, the annual update to the Texas Business Organizations Code, was also laid out and left pending after supportive testimony from the Texas Business Law Foundation and drafting committee representatives. The committee also heard SB 2321, which would codify ERCOT’s current practice of notifying TCEQ when backup generation needs enforcement discretion for grid reliability; Sierra Club and a chamber of commerce witness supported it with suggestions for clearer emissions reporting, and the bill was left pending. SB 2077 would broaden eligibility for the Texas Mutual Insurance Company board by narrowing conflict restrictions tied to insurance-related interests; Texas Mutual supported the change and the bill was left pending. SB 1405, a broadband bill, would align state law with FCC standards and streamline Broadband Development Office processes; it was left pending after supportive testimony. SB 1299, protecting nonprofit donor privacy, drew support from privacy advocates and concerns from one witness about transparency for publicly funded nonprofit operations; it was left pending. The committee then heard SB 776, which would bar government construction contracts from shifting delay damages to contractors when delays are caused solely by the public owner. Contractors, surety representatives, and water infrastructure advocates supported the bill, arguing it would improve fairness and reduce inflated bids, while water utilities and critical infrastructure entities opposed it, warning of more litigation and higher costs; the bill was left pending. Finally, SB 715, which would apply reliability requirements retroactively to all generation resources in ERCOT, drew opposition from renewable and storage groups and support from some critics of renewable subsidies, with witnesses split over whether it would improve reliability or raise costs; testimony was underway when the transcript ended.