Video & Transcript Research : 'utility tariffs'

Page 28 of 476
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

February State Budget and Economic Forecast - 03/06/25

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • , a 20% tariff on China, and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports.
  • tariff has been stayed apparently for one month, along with substantial retaliatory tariffs in place
  • higher tariffs including<00:09:08.560> tariffs<00:09:09.120> on<00:09:09.640> Canadian
  • <00:10:30.800> I've addition to the recent tariffs I've addition to the recent tariffs I've
  • currently has doesn't factor in tariffs currently has doesn't factor in tariffs or<00:49:07.319>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • However, the tariffs that the Trump administration has just announced will quickly demonstrate how change
  • Supply chains are shifting rapidly due to tariffs and geopolitics as relationships between brands and
  • With rising tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and inflation, AB 405's added burdens come at the worst
  • With rising tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and inflation, AB 405's added burdens come at the worst
  • My name is Andrea Abregell with the California Municipal Utilities Association.
Summary: The committee heard several environmental and consumer-safety bills. AB 405, the Fashion Act, would require fashion companies to disclose and manage toxic chemicals in their supply chains; supporters said it would reduce worker and consumer exposure and align with existing industry frameworks, while retailers and business groups argued it would duplicate existing laws and raise costs. After questions about DTSC workload, international standards, and affordability, the bill was moved on a due-pass-as-amended motion to Natural Resources and held on call with three votes. AB 762 would ban the sale and distribution of disposable vape devices; supporters emphasized battery-fire risks, recycling contamination, and waste impacts, while cannabis and convenience-store interests warned it would push consumers to illicit markets and harm legal businesses. The bill passed on a due-pass motion to Business and Professions with three votes and was held on call. The committee also adopted the consent calendar with six votes. AB 794 would direct California to keep in place the federal PFAS drinking-water standard if federal protections are weakened, with supporters citing health risks and the need for certainty, and water agencies opposing the emergency-rulemaking authority and potential costs. Members debated whether the bill was too broad and whether federal funds would cover implementation; the bill passed on a due-pass-as-amended motion to Appropriations with four votes and was held open. AB 1148, the Safer Food Packaging Act, would restrict certain chemicals in food packaging; supporters cited cancer and reproductive-health concerns, while chemical, beverage, and manufacturing groups argued the bill should go through existing regulatory processes and that some chemicals lacked feasible alternatives. The author said she would remove antimony trioxide later in the process after hearing opposition concerns; the bill passed on a due-pass motion to Judiciary with four votes and was held open. Finally, AB 1338 would allow local air districts to recover costs for implementing fence-line air monitoring at metal shredding facilities, building on prior legislation and local air district efforts in AB 617 communities. The author said the bill would preserve local control and improve efficiency, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District testified in support. The transcript ends as the district witness begins testimony, with no vote yet taken on AB 1338.
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Thursday, February 12, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So the question on its face is not about whether tariffs are good or bad.
  • It's not even about whether tariffs are a valid emergency power.
  • It's not even about whether tariffs are a valid emergency power.
  • Now, I would argue course the tariffs.
  • in terms of the tariffs and the retal<03:49:04.080> retaliatory<03:49:04.800> tariffs<
MD

Maryland 2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session, 2/6/2026 #1

Maryland House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Not tariffs today. Oh, no, wait. Not tariffs. Tariffs today. No tariffs tomorrow.
  • No, not tariffs today. Yes, we want tariffs. That is not predictability. Wind today.
  • utilities when they don't set the rates. utilities when they don't set the rates.
  • utility bills that people are getting. utility bills that people are getting.
  • people at the utilities for a dollar. people at the utilities for a dollar.
Summary: The House convened with 117 members present, then 123 after a quorum call, and proceeded through routine introductions and referrals, including introductory House bills 959 through 1018, House Joint Resolution 8, House Simple Resolution 1, several Senate bills, and bond initiatives referred to Appropriations. The main floor item was House Bill 1, concerning investor-owned electric and gas utility cost recovery limitations, which was on third reading and final passage. Debate on HB 1 focused on whether the bill would meaningfully lower utility bills and whether it was necessary given existing Public Service Commission authority. Supporters argued the bill would prevent ratepayers from bearing the cost of executive bonuses and other compensation above $250,000, saying utilities can still pay those costs from shareholder profits and that the measure would save money for customers, even if only modestly. Opponents argued the PSC already has authority to review executive compensation, warned the bill could be largely symbolic or misleading, and said it might encourage utilities to shift bonuses into base salaries or harm recruitment and service quality. Several members also argued the bill did not address other drivers of high bills, such as riders and program costs, and one member said the General Assembly itself was responsible for rising energy costs. No final vote on HB 1 was shown in the transcript excerpt, but members on both sides stated their intended positions, with supporters urging a yes vote and opponents indicating they would vote no. The discussion ended with another member beginning remarks about taking on concentrated corporate power and standing with working people.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Session (Full Formal with Calendar) Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Massachusetts Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Moore: tariff pricing transparency on goods transported into the United States.
  • This amendment, if adopted, would require any tariff or import costs to be itemized, separate from the
  • It ultimately started a tariff war.
  • These tariffs mean that we are already paying high costs of living, which will grow for our everyday
  • These tariffs are essentially a national sales tax.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Senate took up Senate House No. 4010, a fiscal year 2025 supplemental appropriations bill funded largely by surplus Fair Share revenues. The Ways and Means chair described the bill as a $1.28 billion package, with major investments in education and transportation, including special education circuit breaker aid, higher education deferred maintenance, career technical education capital grants, school construction relief, high-dosage tutoring, English language learning grants, MBTA reserve replenishment and safety training, commuter rail maintenance, Chapter 90 local road aid, regional transit authority support, ferry and micro-transit funding, and a small World Cup transportation appropriation. Members from both parties generally praised the bill’s one-time, regionally balanced approach while emphasizing fiscal discipline and the limited, surplus-based funding source. The minority leader and others questioned the fund balances and the use of the education and transportation innovation and capital fund, the Student Opportunity Act trust fund, and the transitional escrow account; the chair said the bill would zero out the innovation and capital fund, leave about $430 million in the SOA trust, and about $200 million in the escrow account. Several members highlighted specific priorities. Senator Cronin and Senator Feeney strongly supported the $100 million career technical education investment, arguing it would expand vocational opportunities in comprehensive high schools and help meet workforce needs. Senator Feeney also emphasized MBTA funding, special education, local road repairs, English language learning tied to workforce needs, and World Cup preparations in Foxborough. Senator Comerford praised the bill’s regional equity, higher education maintenance funding, special education support, and transportation investments, while also noting the need for broader future work on Chapter 70 and school finance. Senator Tarr supported the bill but repeatedly stressed that the spending was a unique one-time opportunity and that the Commonwealth should preserve fiscal reserves and continue to address school funding inequities and MBTA finances more broadly. The chamber then considered numerous amendments. Amendment 1 on tariff pricing transparency was withdrawn after brief remarks, and Amendment 14, proposing a DESE study on educational outcomes for young men and boys, was rejected. Amendment 182, funding Worcester Regional Transit Authority capital expenses, was adopted. Amendment 228, adding $500,000 for Free Period to expand access to menstrual products in schools, was adopted. Amendment 257, funding Springfield Public Schools communication and safety systems, was also adopted. Other amendments, including Tarr amendments on supplemental district aid, MBTA reporting, and the Foundation Budget Review Commission, were rejected. Amendment 308 concerning MBTA Communities and Milton was withdrawn, after which Senator Driscoll began a presentation arguing Milton was being misclassified under the MBTA Communities Act and should be treated fairly under the law.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Good afternoon, and welcome to today's hearing of the Assembly Committee on Utilities and Energy.
  • Madam Chair, Member Scott Weston, on behalf of the California Coalition of Utility Employees, the State
  • And that's not even taking into consideration the impacts of tariffs.
  • My name is Adriya Tinnon, Director of Race Equity and Legislative Policy at TURN, the Utility Reform
  • It applies to all, you know, of the utility... ...guidelines.
Summary: The Assembly Committee on Utilities and Energy heard several bills focused on grid reliability, affordability, clean energy infrastructure, and industrial decarbonization. AB 222, by Assemblymember Bauer-Kahan, would require more data reporting on data centers and aim to prevent ratepayers from bearing related grid costs; supporters said better information is needed to plan for rapidly growing electricity demand from AI and data centers, while opponents warned about privacy, security, trade-secret, and cost-shifting concerns. The bill passed the committee on a 13-4 vote, with the roll left open for absent members. AB 941, by Assemblymember Bonta, would impose a 270-day timeline for CPUC review of priority transmission projects to speed clean-energy infrastructure buildout. Supporters argued that transmission delays are slowing California’s climate goals and raising costs, while opponents raised concerns about CEQA process, staffing, and prioritization. The bill passed 15-0. AB 1191, by Assemblymember Tangipa, would make existing large hydroelectric facilities eligible for the Renewable Portfolio Standard; supporters framed it as a way to lower rates and ease affordability pressures, while opponents said it would undermine the purpose of the RPS by substituting existing resources for new renewable development. That bill failed on a 4-11 vote. AB 1280, by Assemblymember Garcia, would expand state grant programs to support thermal energy storage projects for industrial decarbonization. Supporters said it would help modernize manufacturing, cut pollution in disadvantaged communities, and preserve jobs, with broad support from environmental and clean manufacturing groups and no opposition testimony. The bill passed 17-0. AB 1117, by Assemblymember Schultz, would require the CPUC to offer optional dynamic electricity rate tariffs for customers to shift usage away from peak periods; supporters said it could lower bills and improve grid efficiency, while utilities said they were not opposed to the concept but wanted more flexibility and time in the regulatory process. That bill passed 14-0. The committee also approved its consent calendar and other noncontroversial items, with several measures moving forward unanimously.
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • makes it a good bill, and hopefully this will lead to significant savings for our county, cities, utilities
  • makes it a good bill, and hopefully this will lead to significant savings for our county, cities, utilities
  • There are some ADUs out there that could be utilized for housing.
  • And in rural Nevada, there are a lot of ranches that might have an ADU that could be utilized for families
  • That is dependent upon our utilization, and, you know, ...those rebates also contribute to the general
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

Other - PSCOC Apr 14th, 2025

Public School Capital Outlay Oversight Task Force

Transcript Highlights:
  • So how are we gonna monitor with these tariffs?
  • On page 148 of your document, There's a utilization table.
  • Typically, those are utilization rates we see at the elementary school levels because utilization rates
  • You get a high utilization rate.
  • Diligence and forethought that obviously has been that utilization rate.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 03/05/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:24:14.400> in produced uh or I should say utilized in produced uh or I should say utilized
  • ever Minnesota should be fully utilizing ever Minnesota should be fully utilizing all<00:26:52.279
  • Chair. um maybe a 25% increase in tariffs I I um maybe a 25% increase in tariffs I I just<00:35:33.160
  • <00:36:00.680> sen tariffs sen tariffs sen G<00:36:02.520> thank<00:36:02.680> you
  • Yeah, that is one location we utilize.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Floor Session Aug 21st, 2025

California House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Accountable for tariffs. Thanks.
  • Accountable for tariffs that are driving up our grocery prices every single day.
  • His tariffs have fueled higher prices.
  • One in every five Californians right now can't afford their utility bills.
  • One in every five Californian right now can't afford their utility bills.
Summary: The Assembly met after a quorum call, recess, prayer, and the Pledge of Allegiance, then moved into a highly procedural and contentious floor session centered on redistricting measures. Members debated a point of order raised by Assembly Member DeMaio challenging the constitutionality of SB 280, ACA 8, and AB 604; the Speaker ruled the point not well taken, and the Assembly sustained that ruling on appeal. The body also took up consent-calendar and procedural motions, including suspending rules to adopt late amendments on ACA 8 and to bring the measure up without reference to file. Several motions to re-refer or suspend rules on related measures failed, while the motion to adopt the late amendments on ACA 8 carried. The main substantive item was ACA 8, the Assembly Constitutional Amendment related to redistricting, presented by Assembly Member Berman as a response to mid-decade redistricting efforts in other states, especially Texas. Supporters argued the measure was a temporary, voter-driven response to protect democracy, counter partisan gerrymandering, and address broader threats tied to the Trump administration, including immigration enforcement and health care cuts. Opponents argued ACA 8 would undermine California’s independent citizens redistricting commission, violate the state Constitution, and amount to partisan gerrymandering or a power grab. Members on both sides framed the issue as a defense of democracy, but disagreed sharply over whether the Legislature should act or leave redistricting to voters and the existing commission. No final vote on ACA 8 is shown in the transcript excerpt, but the Assembly did vote on several procedural matters: the appeal of the Speaker’s ruling was sustained 58-18; the motion to adopt late amendments on ACA 8 passed 58-19; a motion to re-refer ACA 8 and SB 280 to Judiciary failed 19-58; and a motion to take up A.J.R. 21 without reference to file failed 19-58. The session remained focused on ACA 8 and related redistricting questions, with extensive floor speeches from both supporters and opponents.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Ways and Means (05/07/2025)

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • I think with the uncertainty of the economy, consumer demand, tariffs, things like that, and the relatively
  • , things like that, demand, um, tariffs, things like that, and<00:08:41.279> relatively<00:08:
  • Uh, next up is the utility property tax.
  • And on top of that, through all of this, we have uh the utility companies doing improvements on their
  • Utility property tax is taken care of. I propose we just do 363.1 for all of the swept.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Science, Technology and Energy (04/21/2025)

Science, Technology and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • you consult with the Public Utilities you consult with the Public Utilities Commission,<00:08:08.000
  • the transition from the public utilities the transition from the public utilities the<00:12:10.160
  • clearing house. the all the utilities clearing house. the all the utilities collect<00:12:31.839
  • uh the public utilities commission and utilities<00:42:55.920> operating<00:42:56.319> in
  • utilities? I don't see how this works. utilities? I don't see how this works.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

State of the Union Address by the President of the United States (Tuesday, February 24, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I used these tariffs took in hundreds of I used these tariffs took in hundreds of billions<01:11:29.840
  • And as time goes by, I believe<01:13:40.800> the<01:13:41.120> tariffs<01:13:42.159>
  • paid for by foreign believe the tariffs paid for by foreign countries<01:13:44.000> will,<01:
  • We got the money from tariffs and other things. A lot of money we have.
  • the money from tariffs and other things. the money from tariffs and other things.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Do you think that tariffs will impact those cracking macadamias in China?
  • Do you think that tariffs will impact those cracking macadamias in China?
  • It's like a neutral territory in the world, and so it would not be subject to tariffs.
  • Do you think that tariffs will impact those cracking macadamias in China?
  • > impact you think that um tariffs will impact you think that um tariffs will impact those<01:
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The joint House Agriculture and Food Systems and Tourism hearing focused on HB 189 and HB 966, both dealing with agricultural tourism. HB 189 would require counties to adopt ordinances governing review and permitting of agricultural tourism as secondary uses on working farms, require the principal agricultural use to pre-exist any tourism-related permit, and limit ag tourism to land where productive agriculture is occurring. HB 966 would create statewide uniform standards for agricultural tourism, require county registration of activities, require ag tourism to coexist with agricultural activity on a farming operation, and end the tourism use when agricultural activity ceases. Testimony on HB 189 was mixed. The Department of Agriculture and Kualoa Ranch opposed the bill, arguing that the proposed restrictions and income-based limits could burden bona fide farms and ranches, reduce flexibility for counties, and harm food production, jobs, and diversification efforts. Kualoa Ranch said ag tourism supports its food sales and community market and warned the bill could cost more than 350 jobs. The Hawaiʻi Cattlemen’s Council also opposed the measure for similar reasons. The Hawaiʻi Farmers Union supported the bill with suggested amendments, including clearer language around agricultural dedication. The Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau supported the intent of the bill but urged caution, saying ag tourism should remain tied to actual agricultural production and that counties need flexibility to address abuses without imposing overly rigid standards. Members discussed how to define a bona fide agricultural operation and whether property tax agricultural dedication could serve as a clearer qualifier. They also raised concerns about how counties would enforce revenue thresholds or separate accounting for tourism and farm income, and whether state law should better target clearly non-agricultural uses such as gondolas or other abusive developments. The Department of Agriculture and Farm Bureau said counties already have authority to regulate ag tourism through ordinances, but that any new standards should avoid unintended burdens on true farmers and ranchers. HB 966 was then introduced, and initial testimony again reflected support for the bill’s intent from some agricultural groups and opposition or caution from others. Kualoa Ranch said ag tourism can help educate visitors and support agriculture, the Hawaiʻi Farmers Union supported county flexibility, and the Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau reiterated concerns about the bill’s income comparison provisions and the need to distinguish legitimate agricultural tourism from misuse. No votes were taken during the hearing.
ND

North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session

Artificial Intelligence and Data Center Committee Jul 15th, 2026

Artificial Intelligence and Data Center Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • And tariffs play into that.
  • One of the challenges that state utility commissioners have had, utilities have had, as well as you'll
  • One of the challenges that state utility commissioners have had, utilities have had, as well as you'll
  • They are not regulated utilities.
  • by a vertically integrated regulated utility in the case of investor-owned utilities, but a vertically
Summary: The committee held its first meeting on artificial intelligence and data centers, establishing its purpose as a study and policy-development body rather than one aimed at producing many bills. Majority Leader Hogue urged members to move quickly, focus on federal and other states’ AI laws, consider possible federal preemption, child protections, and the siting and economic impacts of data centers. Committee leadership echoed that the goal is practical, balanced governance that protects North Dakota while allowing innovation to continue. Legislative Council staff provided a background memo and NCSL presented a detailed overview of AI concepts and the current state legislative landscape. The presentations distinguished narrow AI, generative AI, agentic AI, and theoretical AGI/ASI, and summarized major state policy themes: comprehensive AI laws in states such as Utah, Colorado, Texas, California, and Illinois; targeted laws on deepfakes, chatbots, health, education, notifications, and digital likeness; and growing use of appropriations and agency inventories. Members asked about Colorado’s repeal and reenactment, Texas’s sandbox and training provisions, oversight structures, and whether AI regulation is bipartisan; presenters said most issues cut across party lines, with broad agreement on child safety and deepfakes but more division on broader regulatory approaches. The federal update focused on executive orders, preemption, and congressional activity. NCSL described a White House framework favoring a single federal standard, a DOJ litigation task force, Commerce Department review of state laws, and possible funding conditions tied to state AI policy, though no formal state-law challenge had yet occurred. The presentation also covered a recent executive order creating a voluntary federal vetting process for advanced frontier models after safety concerns, and congressional proposals including a failed 10-year state moratorium, Senator Blackburn’s child-safety bills, the Kids Online Safety Act, a House-passed children’s digital safety package, a Senate data center moratorium proposal, and a House ratepayer/data-center bill. The committee took no formal action beyond receiving testimony and asking questions.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Delivering for the Northland – Senator Grant Hauschild May 12th, 2025

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hockey Hall of Fame, then let's make sure that state dollars don't get utilized for that move.
  • We don't know what's going to happen with tariffs.
  • 56.639> with don't know what's going to happen with don't know what's going to happen with tariffs
  • :58.400> are<00:07:58.639> folks<00:07:58.960> that<00:07:59.280> are tariffs
  • Um and these are folks that are tariffs.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, July 23, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Why are we putting a 10 or 15 or 20% tariff on food that we can't even grow in the United States?
  • c> that<01:13:17.520> Donald Number one, the tariffs that Donald Number one, the tariffs that
  • Businesses are stymied by President Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs.
  • Taco or not again, off-again tariffs.
  • Debates over the utility and morality of nuclear weapons are as old as the nuclear age.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • So what this harmed by these tariffs.
  • You know, uh we uh from these tariffs.
  • from this president related to tariffs. from this president related to tariffs.
  • on China goods and the uh tariff on China goods and the reciprocal<00:41:25.760> tariffs<00:41
  • for motans are actually being utilized for motans are actually being utilized appropriately.<01:
Keywords: 1183, house
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee Apr 8th, 2025

Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials

Transcript Highlights:
  • However, the tariffs that the Trump administration has just announced will quickly demonstrate how change
  • Supply chains are shifting rapidly due to tariffs and geopolitics, as relationships between brands and
  • These costs will inevitably be passed on to consumers through higher prices with rising tariffs supply
  • Congress recently provided utilities nine billion dollars specifically to address PFAS in the bipartisan
  • My name is Andrea Abergele with the California Municipal Utilities Association.
Keywords: 988, house, all