Video & Transcript Research : 'testimonials'
Page 288 of 500
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- You have a combined of five minutes for your testimony today. Thank you.
- I want to thank you for being here for your testimony.
- I did listen to some of the testimony earlier today and thank you for that.
- Thank you both for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony. Anyone else in support?
Summary:
The committee first took up SB 1377, a bill on medical exemptions for school immunizations. The author and supporters said the measure was a narrow reform to restore physician discretion and reduce what they described as chilling effects from audits and license discipline; opponents from pediatric, medical, public health, and school groups argued the current system already works, protects against fraudulent exemptions, and should not be weakened. Committee members debated the data, the number of exemptions reviewed or revoked, and the effect of the proposed amendments. The bill was amended in committee, but because there was no quorum it was not formally voted on at that time.
The committee then heard SB 995, the Masuma Khan Justice Act, which would create a statewide inspection and compliance framework for large private detention facilities. The author and supporters described severe conditions in immigration detention, including denial of medication, unsafe food and water, and lack of oversight, and the bill was presented as a response to those abuses. The California Hospital Association raised concerns about duplicative regulation and overlapping standards, but said it was continuing to work on a solution. The committee discussed constitutional and jurisdictional issues, and the bill was moved on a do-pass motion to the Committee on Judiciary with a 5-0 vote placed on call.
Next, SB 1089 was heard, proposing expanded access through CalPERS and CalRX to GLP-1 medications for chronic weight disease and diabetes prevention. The author and supporters from the American Diabetes Association and medical groups argued the drugs are effective tools to prevent type 2 diabetes, reduce long-term costs, and improve health equity, while the author also shared personal experience with weight loss and medication access barriers. There was no opposition testimony. The bill was moved on a do-pass motion to the Committee on Labor, Public Employment, and Retirement with a 5-0 vote placed on call.
Finally, the committee heard SB 1221, dealing with Murphy conservatorships for people found not guilty by reason of insanity or otherwise under criminal-mental health conservatorship. Supporters, including prosecutors and psychiatrists, said the bill addresses a gap created by a court decision and would improve public safety and placement decisions for a small population of high-risk individuals. Opponents from county behavioral health and disability rights groups warned it would turn a civil process into a quasi-criminal one, expand district attorney involvement, and disrupt bed prioritization and least-restrictive-placement principles. The discussion centered on the scope of the bill and its amendments, but no final vote was taken in the portion provided.
MD
Transcript Highlights:
- Some of the committee testimony seems to indicate that it is. Okay.
- Some of the committee some of the testimony<00:21:01.760>
is <00:21:02.080>seems <00:21: - is seems to indicate that it testimony is seems to indicate that it is.<00:21:03.200>
Okay. - My first question is: is there a lot of testimony against that 45-day window?
- Did the county executive of Harford County adjust his testimony, or is he still against?
Summary:
The House convened with 127 members present, heard a prayer, and then recognized 2025 Maryland Blue Ribbon Schools and the Maryland Municipal League on its 90th anniversary. The Blue Ribbon resolution named Baltimore Polytechnic Institute, Diamond Elementary School, Little Flower School, Meyersville Elementary School, St. Louis School, Stoneleigh Elementary School, and Wilson Whims Elementary School, with principals introduced from the gallery. The MML resolution honored the league’s service to Maryland’s cities and towns and invited members to meet municipal officials after the floor session. The clerk also noted a second printing of the 2026 rule book due to a table-of-contents error.
The chamber then took up House Bill 80, the Residential Leases Fee Disclosures bill. Floor debate focused on what fees must be disclosed, what counts as a utility versus a fee, whether the bill applies to oral leases, and how the measure applies to landlords with four or more units. Supporters said the bill is intended to ensure tenants know all upfront fees before signing and to create a clear enforcement pathway; opponents raised concerns about penalties, affordability, and the burden on landlords. The bill passed on third reading by a vote of 95-34.
The House next considered House Bill 153, which requires air conditioning in newly constructed residential rental units and units undergoing specified substantial renovations, with the standard that habitable spaces be kept at 80 degrees or lower. Members asked whether window units would satisfy the requirement, how the bill interacts with older buildings and ongoing renovations, whether it applies retroactively, how enforcement would work, and whether it references federal refrigerant rules; the sponsor said it does not require central air and is prospective only. Supporters argued it reflects existing practice in Montgomery and Prince George’s counties and clarifies habitability standards, while opponents cited costs and concerns about older homes. The transcript ends during debate on this bill, before a final vote is recorded.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- You may begin your testimony. >> Thank you. >> Great. Thanks.
- your testimony. your testimony.
- . >> Thank you so much for your testimony.
- >> Seeing none, thank you so much for your testimony.
- Please introduce yourselves for the record and you may begin your testimony.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- Angela's testimony, I felt compelled.
- And I I testimony, I I felt compelled.
- And I thank you for taking my testimony. >> Thank you, Miss Manfield. Any questions?
- you for taking my testimony. you for taking my testimony.
- and the hearing testimony and the hearing testimony that<01:18:50.880>
the <01:18:51.199><
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- Addis: The anti-hemorrhaging medications, I think you briefly touched on that in your testimony.
- Addis, the anti-hemorrhaging medications, I think you briefly touched on that in your testimony.
- As I mentioned during my testimony last session, the data match On the bill.
- As I mentioned during my testimony last session, the data match As I mentioned during my testimony last
- Jaffrey for her testimony today. What you said today really hit home.
Keywords:
physician assistants, licensure compact, medical services, multistate practice, patient care access, healthcare workforce, military families, adverse actions, dementia care, telementoring, healthcare education, rural communities, grant funding, HB 2233, rural health transformation, rural health transformation program, AHCCCS, Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, Joint Legislative Budget Committee, JLBC
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Artificial Intelligence Task Force 2025 (8-14-25) - Reupload
Transcript Highlights:
- So, um, if you will please just introduce yourself and um then you can proceed with your testimony.
- So, um, if you will please just introduce yourself and um then you can proceed with your testimony.
- If you'll just introduce yourself for the record and then you can begin your testimony. >> Yes.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony. All right. Thank you for your testimony.
Keywords:
Meeting Start - 00:00
Roll Call – 00:15
Approval of Minutes of the July 15, 2025, Meeting 00:55
Helping Power Kentucky’s Growth – 01:25
Powering and Deploying AI – 41:00
Fueling America’s Intelligence – 56:12
Adjournment – 01:10:37, 958, all
Summary:
The Artificial Intelligence Task Force met with a quorum, adopted prior meeting minutes, and then focused on energy policy and economic development as they relate to AI and data centers. John Bevington of LG&E and KU, introduced by Caroline Clark of LG&E/KU and PPL, described the utility’s Kentucky-only service territory, vertically integrated system, 1.3 million customers, and about 7.5 gigawatts of generating capacity. He said the company has supported 76 Kentucky projects in 2024 totaling about $3 billion in announced investment and roughly 3,000 jobs, with a large share of statewide announcements occurring in its service area.
Bevington said LG&E and KU’s current project pipeline is unusually strong, totaling about 170 projects and 8.5 gigawatts of requested power, with data centers accounting for about two-thirds of that demand. He broke the pipeline into existing customer expansions, new-to-Kentucky projects, and 20 data center projects representing about 5.6 gigawatts of potential load. He highlighted a Louisville data center project by PO Development Company and Powerhouse Data Centers that has announced a 400-megawatt facility and may expand to 525 megawatts, estimating that such a project could represent about $4 billion in investment. He also explained that large data centers generally must locate near transmission lines and that utilities must conduct studies, order long-lead equipment, and secure reimbursement commitments before proceeding so other customers are not harmed.
Members asked about how Kentucky compares with other states, the size of data center projects, and whether regulatory reform is needed. Bevington said the 20 projects reflect current Kentucky interest, which he attributed in part to the state’s sales tax exemption for data centers, and noted that states like Ohio have had similar incentives for years. In response to questions from Senator Thomas, he confirmed that data centers can vary in size and said the state should have a regulatory environment that supports economic development, while emphasizing that the benefits would flow to the state, local communities, and schools rather than just the utility. He also cited national and regional data suggesting data centers generate indirect jobs and tax revenue, and said LG&E and KU are investing in transmission, reliability, solar, and gas generation projects, including proposed additional 645-megawatt natural gas units and other system upgrades, to meet expected demand.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25
State Government Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank you for the opportunity to provide very brief testimony on the committee's policy omnibus bill.
- :18:28.760>
provide <01:18:29.199>very <01:18:29.440>brief <01:18:30.000>testimony - <01:18:30.560>
on <01:18:30.719>the to provide very brief testimony on the to provide - very brief testimony on the committee's<01:18:31.440>
policy <01:18:31.920>Omnibus <01: - thank you very much uh next we testimony thank you very much uh next we have<01:19:19.880>
Devin<
Keywords:
HF627, fiscal note, fiscal notes, Minnesota Legislature, state government, committee procedure, ranking minority member, minority party, standing committee, Ways and Means, Finance Committee, legislative process, budget analysis, fiscal impact, Minnesota Statutes 3.98, committee chair, legislative transparency, HF474, Hubert H. Humphrey, Henry Mower Rice
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Before we go to questions, why don’t we go to some testimony here if that’s okay?
- Thank you so much for your testimony. I appreciate any questions for the testifier.
- Okay, thank you so much for your testimony. We appreciate it. We have Mr.
- Hunter Peterson, if you could please come forward and give us your testimony.
- Peterson: Okay, thank you so much for your testimony.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank you for your time today and for hearing our testimony. Questions from the committee?
- Thank you for your time today and for hearing our testimony.
- Thank you for your time today and for hearing our testimony.
- And that is the extent of my testimony.
- And that is the extent of my testimony.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, just some questions I saw in your testimony back in January.
- Being a work session, I did not prepare testimony.
- However, if you like, I could testimony.
- When what you were reading was the Senate testimony, uh, and I'm wondering, I couldn't find anything
- Representative Brier. >> Um, yeah, after hearing some more testimony today and hearing from DOT, um,
Summary:
The work session focused first on SP 492, a bill intended to give the New Hampshire Department of Military Affairs and Veterans Services authority to lease or license property for housing and related uses. Major General David Mikolitis testified that the bill is aimed at addressing affordable housing for junior enlisted service members, especially those assigned to Pease Air National Guard Base who currently face long commutes because of the Seacoast housing shortage. He said the most likely uses would be converting limited barracks space in Pembroke or Stratford into apartment-style or extended-stay housing, and possibly allowing office/co-op space for federal civilians, though he emphasized the primary purpose is housing for junior ranks. He also said any development would likely be done by a private developer through an RFP, with costs borne by the developer rather than the department.
Committee members asked about whether the bill could apply to commercial uses, how taxes would work, whether revenues would go into the general fund, and whether the concept could be expanded statewide. Mikolitis said the intent was housing only, not commercial development like a Starbucks, and that any developed property would be taxable locally rather than remain tax-exempt. He said revenues would go into a dedicated Veteran Services Property Fund and be used for facilities, not the general fund. He also explained that the department has about 20 armories statewide but sees only a few viable locations for this concept, mainly Pembroke, Stratford, and possibly one other site, because the goal is to serve personnel within roughly a 45-minute drive of Pease. He noted that a proposed seven-acre parcel near Pease had already been approved by the Pease Development Authority but still needed FAA approval, and he was not optimistic about using that land for housing because of contamination and redevelopment costs. Committee discussion ended with members indicating support for OTP, but the chair said the vote would have to wait until 11 o'clock and then closed the work session on SP 492.
The committee then opened a work session on SP 627 and heard testimony from Jim Jelbert, owner of CJ Bus Lines and chair of the legislature’s transportation council, who spoke in support of the bill. Jelbert argued that the measure would allow New Hampshire to raise tolls and generate significant revenue for the 10-year highway plan without directly taxing citizens, and said the money could address congestion and safety problems, including work on I-93 in Manchester and other statewide projects. He estimated the bill could generate substantial revenue over time and said toll credits could help leverage federal matching funds. He also said improved roads would benefit businesses like his by reducing vehicle wear and improving efficiency. The transcript cuts off before any committee action on SP 627 is recorded.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Well, then we'll just go with our verbal testimony.
- So, as go with our our verbal testimony.
- Any testimony from Thank you very much.
- [laughter] Okay, if you could provide your testimony, please.
- Thank you, testimony, please. Okay.
Keywords:
Crosby, local sales tax, bonding authority, community projects, voter approval, Owatonna, use tax, special law, community center, municipal finance, capital project, sales and use tax, local option tax, city tax, public facility, general election, bond referendum, debt limit, levy limit, Minnesota local government
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:43:29.920>
and consideration um of this testimony and consideration um of this testimony - to provide testimony on HB1 1207<01:10:45.920>
this <01:10:46.159>morning. - Appreciate your testimony. Is there anyone else who would like to speak on House Bill 1502?
- Appreciate your<01:32:57.920>
testimony. - Is there anyone else who your testimony.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/26
Human Services Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Please state your name for the record and present your testimony. Good morning, Mr.
- . your testimony.
- And thank you for your testimony.
- Please state your name for the record and provide us with your testimony. Thank you, Mr.
- with your testimony. with your testimony. Thank<01:15:56.000>
you, <01:15:56.080>Mr.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 2/24/26
Energy Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:58:55.920>
Um, <00:58:56.079>and >> Thank you for your testimony. - Um, and >> Thank you for your testimony.
- So that's the end of my testimony. I hope that you can support this bill.
- So that's the end of my testimony. I hope that you can support this bill.
- Thank you. >> Thank you so much for your testimony.
Keywords:
virtual power plant, VPP, distributed energy resources, DER, demand response, load management, grid modernization, peak demand, peak shaving, battery storage, energy storage, solar photovoltaic, solar panels, electric vehicles, smart thermostats, heat pumps, aggregator, public utilities commission, PUC, rate recovery
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs (10/17/2025)
State-federal Relations and Veterans Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, and I was very moved by the testimony of the veterans who showed up and looked me in the eye and
- of the veterans who showed up testimony of the veterans who showed up and<00:58:38.480>
looked - I think that's a testimony to the work that the sponsors and supporters did.
- and I am not pleased with this testimony and I am not pleased with the<01:33:35.040>
manner <01- Even though I am a co-sponsor on this bill because I could relate to the testimony.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/25
Human Services Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Seeing none, public testimony was closed.
- Please state your name for the record and present your testimony. Thank you, Mr.
- <01:11:17.320>
in opportunity to provide testimony in opportunity to provide testimony in - Grabon, for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony, Ms. Harut.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- We will take testimony...
- We will take testimony when we get the bill in shape.
- He also says it takes $7 million from the Blue Line and moves it into this to backfill it. testimony
- oh okay we'll we'll do that testimony oh okay we'll we'll do that when<00:28:39.640>
we <00:28: - The chair then moved to testimony and asked witnesses to state whether they support the bill or not.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- As you know, the federal criminal trial started just last week, with opening statements and testimony
- opening statements and testimony opening statements and testimony starting<00:46:36.000>
yesterday - Sure, Madam Chair, and I just—we had testimony earlier as far as going through the study and report that
- and the uh team for coming the testimony and the uh the<01:02:28.960>
report <01:02:29.400> - before us and I appreciate the testimony before us and I appreciate the testimony you<01:02:44.880
Summary:
The Education Policy Committee met to hear a delayed presentation from the Office of the Legislative Auditor on MDE’s oversight of Feeding Our Future, a report released in June 2024. The chair framed the hearing as an oversight review of how the Minnesota Department of Education handled the nonprofit’s participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program and the Summer Food Service Program, emphasizing that the hearing was not about criminal charges against agency staff. Legislative Auditor Judy Randall and Director of Special Reviews Katherine Tyson explained that their review focused on state oversight, not the underlying federal fraud case, which involved an alleged $250 million scheme and ongoing criminal proceedings.
The auditors concluded that MDE’s oversight was inadequate and created opportunities for fraud. They said MDE failed to act on warning signs before the pandemic, did not effectively use its authority to hold Feeding Our Future accountable, and was ill prepared to respond to problems. Examples included approving applications despite concerns about internal controls and staffing, failing to follow up on earlier review findings, not adequately investigating at least 30 complaints, and in one case referring a complaint back to Feeding Our Future for resolution rather than conducting an independent investigation. They also said MDE deferred serious deficiencies without enough evidence that problems had been fully corrected and approved meal claims despite records showing major inconsistencies.
Tyson said MDE had made progress on all eight recommendations in the report, though one recommendation to the legislature had not yet been addressed because the session had not convened since the report’s release. The auditors recommended that the legislature establish clearer statutory criteria or give MDE rulemaking authority for sponsor applications, and that MDE strengthen verification of sponsor information, focus more on high-risk sponsors, improve complaint procedures, and emphasize program integrity if waivers reduce oversight in the future. In response to member questions, the auditors said MDE’s reported progress was partial in some areas and that further review would be needed to fully confirm implementation. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the hearing.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- There is nobody in opposition to this bill, so consider that in your testimony in keeping it short.
- Katie, if you want to come up, I have your written testimony as do the other members of the committee
- I will not read from the testimony; I will summarize for you today.
- Yeah, I have concerns based on the testimony that was brought in.
- We did hear testimony that they have concerns.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- We'll give you one to two minutes for your opening testimony.
- And then we will, if in your opening testimony, you can introduce any of your guests you may have here
- You'll have one to two minutes for your opening testimony to committee.
- You're welcome to introduce any of your guests in the opening testimony, and you may begin when you're
- Today, you'll have one to two minutes to provide your opening testimony.
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Rules first established quorum and took up several routine items, including two governor’s appointments to the Court Reporters Board, references of bills to committees, and floor acknowledgments. Heather Lynn Gonzalez’s appointment was approved 3-1, Allison Salton-Sall’s appointment was approved 4-0, and the other routine items were approved 4-0.
The committee then heard testimony on two Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation appointments, Kathleen Ratliff and Joseph Tuggle, both associate directors in the Division of Adult Institutions. Senators focused heavily on the California model, staff safety, prison violence, sexual abuse prevention, retaliation concerns, and visitation. Ratliff and Tuggle said the California model is meant to balance rehabilitation with safety, that CDCR has improved communication and training, and that incidents such as the pepper-spray event at Central California Women’s Facility led to discipline, investigations, retraining, and policy review. They also described PREA reporting systems, anti-retaliation protections, statewide visiting meetings, and efforts to make visiting more family-centered and consistent. Public commenters largely supported both nominees, citing their work on rehabilitation, reentry, and sexual abuse response.
The committee unanimously voted 4-0 to send both Ratliff and Tuggle to the Senate floor for confirmation. It then heard from Jason Johnson, nominated as CDCR Undersecretary of Operations. Senators questioned him about parole supervision, public safety, contraband, prison rape prevention, workplace culture, whistleblower retaliation, and repeated allegations in late-filed opposition letters. Johnson said parole risk is assessed through established scoring and supervision levels, that sex offenders are subject to GPS monitoring and treatment, and that operations use investigations, training, and collaboration with law enforcement to address contraband and misconduct. He emphasized rehabilitation, culture change, accountability, and his commitment to staff and public safety, while acknowledging criticism and the difficulty of leading a large institution. No vote on Johnson was taken in the portion provided.